K230343 · Epic Medical Pte. , Ltd. · FPA · Nov 3, 2023 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
K230343
Device Name
ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set
Applicant
Epic Medical Pte. , Ltd.
Product Code
FPA · General Hospital
Decision Date
Nov 3, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 880.5440
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Administration Sets are intravenous administration sets intended for delivery of medications and fluids from a container into a patient's vascular system.
Device Story
ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set is a single-use, disposable, gravity-fed intravenous administration set. Components include a self-sealing injector for container access, drip chamber with 15-um particulate filter, roller clamp, PVC tubing, luer connector, and priming cap with 3-um air filter. Used by trained healthcare professionals or pharmacists in clinical settings to deliver parenteral fluids/medications. The injector allows access up to 5 times in 7 days. Device connects to standard IV therapy components (e.g., luer lock adaptors, extension sets). Output is the controlled delivery of fluids to the patient's vascular system. Benefits include closed-system fluid administration and reduced contamination risk.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Evidence consists of bench testing, including biocompatibility (cytotoxicity, sensitization, reactivity, systemic toxicity, hemolysis, pyrogenicity), particulate matter testing (ISO 8536-4, USP <788>), functional performance (ISO 8536-4, ISO 80369-7/20, ANSI/AAMI CN27), sterility validation (ISO 11135), and shelf-life/shipping validation (ASTM D4169-22, ASTM F88/F88M-21, ASTM 1980-21).
Technological Characteristics
Materials: PP, SUS 304 Steel, TPE, PVC (DEHP-free), ABS, PET, PTFE. Gravity-fed infusion set. Dimensions: 210 cm length, 3.0 mm ID, 4.0 mm OD. 20 gtt/ml drip rate. Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide (SAL 10^-6). Standards: ISO 8536-4, ISO 80369-7, ISO 80369-20, ANSI/AAMI CN27, ANSI/AAMI ST72, ISO 10993-1, ISO 11135, ASTM D4169, ASTM F88, ASTM 1980.
Indications for Use
Indicated for delivery of medications and fluids from a container into a patient's vascular system. Intended for use by adequately trained health care professionals or pharmacists in a clinical setting. Prescription use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intravascular administration set is a device used to administer fluids from a container to a patient's vascular system through a needle or catheter inserted into a vein. The device may include the needle or catheter, tubing, a flow regulator, a drip chamber, an infusion line filter, an I.V. set stopcock, fluid delivery tubing, connectors between parts of the set, a side tube with a cap to serve as an injection site, and a hollow spike to penetrate and connect the tubing to an I.V. bag or other infusion fluid container.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for pharmacy compounding systems within this classification is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Pharmacy Compounding Systems; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Reviewers.” Pharmacy compounding systems classified within the intravascular administration set are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of this part and subject to the limitations in § 880.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo includes the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left. To the right of that is the FDA logo in blue. The words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" are written in blue.
November 3, 2023
Epic Medical Pte. Ltd. Freddie Lee CEO, MD 105 Cecil, 20-01 The Octagon Singapore, Singapore 069534 Singapore
Re: K230343
Trade/Device Name: ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.5440 Regulation Name: Intravascular Administration Set Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FPA Dated: October 3, 2023 Received: October 3, 2023
Dear Freddie Lee:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrb/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review. the OS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.70) and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE(@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
David Walloschek
David Wolloscheck, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT3C: Division of Drug Delivery and General Hospital Devices, and Human Factors OHT3: Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn, General Hospital, and Urology Devices
{2}------------------------------------------------
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K230343
Device Name ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Administration Sets are intravenous administration sets intended for delivery of medications and fluids from a container into a patient's vascular system.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <div> <span>☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </div> | <div> <span>☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </div> |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
### gp10
### K230343 - 510(k) Summary
#### Submitter I.
Epic Medical Pte. Ltd. 105 Cecil Street #20-04, The Octagon, Singapore 069534. Phone: +65 9635 2618 / +66 81 761 5292
Contact Person: Mr. Freddie LEE, Chief Executive Officer/ Managing Director Date Prepared: November 3, 2023
### II. Subject Device
| 510(k) Number: | K230343 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| Proprietary/Trade Name: | ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set |
| Common /Usual Name: | I.V. Administration Set |
| Regulation Name: | Set, Administration, Intravascular |
| Product Code: | FPA |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 880.5440 |
| Device Class: | Class: II |
### III. Predicate Device
| 510(k) Number: | K151151 |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Proprietary/Trade Name: | U & U Intravascular Administration Set |
| Common/Usual Name: | I.V. Administration Set |
| Regulation Name: | Set, Administration, Intravascular |
| Product Code: | FPA |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 880.5440 |
| Device Class: | Class: II |
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for EPIC. The logo is in black and white and features the word "EPIC" in a stylized font. There is a solid line underneath the word "EPIC".
### IV. Device Description
The ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set is a single use-, disposable-, intravenousadministration set used to deliver fluids from a container into a patient's vascular system.
The device comprises an injector, a drip chamber* with a 15-um particulate filter, a roller clamp, flexible IV tubings*, a luer connector and a priming cap with a 3-um air filter. ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set may be used in combination with standard IV therapy devices widely used throughout the health care industry, e.g. luer lock adaptor and IV extension sets. ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set is configured to achieve the intended use when used in combination with these aforementioned standard complementary products.
Based on the approved microbial testing in K192075, the ProSeal injector can be accessed/used for up to maximum of 5 times in 7 days.
- * Both the drip chamber and the IV tubings are not made with DEHP (Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)).
### V. Indications for Use Statement
The Administration Sets are intravenous administration sets intended for delivery of medications and fluids from a container into a patient's vascular system.
### VI. Comparison of Technological Characteristics
The ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Sets have the same indications for use, comparable principle of operation and the same fundamental scientific technology as the Predicate device (§III). Both devices are composed of similar component types, and both meet the performance specifications in the relevant FDA Recognized Consensus Standards and ISO standards. The IV tubings in both IV administration sets are of extruded Polyvinylchloride (PVC) without Di (2ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) plasticizer.
Successful completion of biocompatibility laboratory analyses and chemical characterization evaluations per ISO 10993-1 confirmed that differences in materials vs. the Predicate device showed these did not adversely impact the biological or chemical safety of the ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set. Additionally, analytical and functional performance evaluations were conducted to further assure that differences did not adversely affect the substantial equivalence of the Subject device.
An overview table summarizing the comparisons between the Subject ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set and the Predicate U & U Intravascular Administration Set is provided in the table that follows.
{6}------------------------------------------------
### 집합1C
| Technological<br>characteristic<br>compared | Predicate Device<br>U & U Intravascular<br>Administration Set (K151151) | Subject Device<br>ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set<br>(K230343) | Comment/ Discussion |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
| Indications for<br>Use statement | The U&U Intravascular Administration Set<br>is a device used to administer fluids from a<br>container to a patient's<br>vascular system through a needle or catheter<br>inserted into a vein. | The Administration Sets are intravenous<br>administration sets intended for delivery of<br>medications and fluids from a container<br>into a patient's vascular system. | Same |
| Product code<br>and regulation<br>number | FPA<br>21 CFR 880.5440 | FPA<br>21 CFR 880.5440 | Same |
| Intended user<br>population/<br>intended use<br>environment | Adequately trained<br>health care professionals or pharmacists/<br>clinical setting | Adequately trained<br>health care professionals or pharmacists/<br>clinical setting | Same |
| Intended<br>drug type | Parenteral drugs | Parenteral drugs | Same |
| R/<br>Prescription use | R only | R only | Same |
| Mode of IV<br>fluid therapy<br>delivery | Gravity administration | Gravity administration | Same |
| Tubing<br>transparency | The IV tubings are<br>transparent and sufficiently clear<br>so that the interface of air and<br>water during the passage of<br>air bubbles can be observed<br>with normal or corrected vision | The IV tubings are<br>transparent and sufficiently clear<br>so that the interface of air and<br>water during the passage of<br>air bubbles can be observed<br>with normal or corrected vision | Same |
| Technological<br>characteristic<br>compared | Predicate Device<br>U & U Intravascular<br>Administration Set (K151151) | Subject Device<br>ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set<br>(K230343) | Comment/ Discussion |
| Composition<br>of device sub-<br>assemblies/<br>component parts | Bag Spike - present<br>Injector - not applicable (N.A.)<br>IV tubings – present<br>MLL connector – present<br>Drip chamber - present<br>Needleless Y-Site - present<br>Priming cap - N.A. | Bag Spike - not applicable (N.A.)<br>Injector - present<br>IV tubings - present<br>MLL connector - present<br>Drip chamber - present<br>Needleless Y-Site - absent<br>Priming cap - present | Different, see Comment #1 |
| Composition of<br>fluid -path /<br>-contacting<br>materials | Bag Spike - ABS<br>Injector - N.A.<br>IV tubings - PVC (not made with DEHP)<br>MLL connector – ABS<br>Drip chamber – unknown<br>Needleless Y-Site - unknown<br>Priming cap - N.A. | Bag Spike - N.A.<br>Injector - PP, SUS 304 Steel, TPE<br>IV tubings – PVC (not made with DEHP)<br>MLL connector - ABS<br>Drip chamber – PVC (not made with<br>DEHP), ABS, polyethylene terephthalate<br>(PET)<br>Needleless Y-Site - N.A.<br>Priming cap - PP, Polytetrafluoroethylene<br>(PTFE) | Different, see Comment #2 |
| Dimensions<br>of IV set | Set overall length: Not known<br>PVC tubing:<br>Inner diameter (ID): Not known<br>Outer diameter (OD): Not known | Set overall length: 210 cm<br>PVC tubing:<br>Inner diameter (ID): 3.0 mm<br>Outer diameter (OD): 4.0 mm | Different, see Comment #2 |
| Drops/ml | Not known | 20 gtt/ml | Different, see Comment #2 |
| Priming volume/<br>residual volume | Not known | 11.86 ml | Different, see Comment #2 |
| Technological<br>characteristic<br>compared | Predicate Device<br>U & U Intravascular<br>Administration Set (K151151) | Subject Device<br>ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set<br>(K230343) | Comment/ Discussion |
| Residual volume<br>in needleless Y-<br>site connector | Not known | Not applicable, Subject device does not<br>incorporate a Y-site connector | Different, see Comment #2 |
| Connector type<br>to IV bag spike | Integrated spike | Proximal connector:<br>closed system injector<br>(The injector was 510(k) cleared<br>(K192075).) | Different, see Comment #1 |
| Connector type<br>at distal side of<br>IV admin. set | Distal connector:<br>Male Luer lock tip (ISO 80369-7) | Distal connector:<br>Male Luer lock tip (ISO 80369-7) | Same |
| Biocompatibility | Acceptable biological risks<br>established by demonstrating<br>that the device meets ISO 10993-1 | Acceptable biological risk management and<br>control were established by demonstrating<br>that the Subject device met ISO 10993-1<br>through providing data of laboratory<br>analyses of the final finished device, and<br>of evaluations of biological endpoints<br>specified for – the Nature of Body Contact<br>category - external communicating device,<br>blood path indirect and; Contact Duration<br>type - B - Prolonged (>24h to ≤30d) | Same |
| Particulate<br>contamination | Met contamination index, N<90 according<br>to ISO 8536-4, Infusion Equipment for<br>Medical Use, Part 4: Infusion sets for single<br>use, gravity feed, Annex A, A.2 - Test for<br>particulate contamination | Met contamination index, N<90 according<br>to ISO 8536-4, Infusion Equipment for<br>Medical Use, Part 4: Infusion sets for single<br>use, gravity feed, Annex A, A.2 - Test for<br>particulate contamination<br>and USP <788><br>Particulate Matter in Injections | Same |
| Technological<br>characteristic<br>compared | Predicate Device<br>U & U Intravascular<br>Administration Set (K151151) | Subject Device<br>ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set<br>(K230343) | Comment/ Discussion |
| Primary package<br>top web | Not known | Medical grade paper and medical plastic<br>film, heat sealed | Different, see Comment #3 |
| Sterilization<br>method | Ethylene Oxide, EO, SAL 10-6 | Ethylene Oxide, EO, SAL 10-6 | Same |
| Shelf life | 3 years (36 months) | 3 years (36 months) | Same |
| Reuse<br>or single-use | Single-use only | Single-use only | Same |
| Labeling<br>specifications | Meets the requirements<br>specified in 21 CFR 801 | Meets the requirements<br>specified in 21 CFR 801 | Same |
The overview table hereunder compares the listed parameters between the Subject and Predicate devices.
{7}------------------------------------------------
# @DIC
{8}------------------------------------------------
## 집 1 C
{9}------------------------------------------------
#### Discussion of differences in technological characteristics
#### Comment #1
Subject device uses a self-sealing perforator (the integrated ProSeal injector) to connect to an IV fluid bag, whereas the Predicate connects to the IV fluid bag with its integrated spike includes a priming cap which will be removed after priming.
The evaluation of the difference is one with equivalence. This was because, based on the approved microbial testing in K192075, the ProSeal injector can be accessed/used for up to maximum of 5 times in 7 days, it was found it did not raise any safety or performance issues/ concerns/ new questions.
{10}------------------------------------------------
## cb10
### Comment #2
Even though there was incomplete Predicate device information to perform comparisons for all component parts, the applicant had established equivalence through testing and provided evidence to support the substantial equivalence evaluation - The sterile, single-use, nonpyrogenic ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set described in this Summary were tested and demonstrated to be in conformance with the following ISO and FDA recognized standards:
- · ANSI/AAMI CN27:2021, General requirements for Luer activated valves (LAVs) incorporated into medical devices for intravascular applications
- · ANSI/AAMI ST72/ 2019, Bacterial endotoxins Test methods, routing monitoring, and alternatives to batch testing
- · ISO 8536-4: 2019, Infusion equipment for medical use Part 4: Infusion sets for single use, gravity feed
- · ISO 80369-7: 2016, Small-bore connectors for liquids and gases in healthcare applications-(Part 7: Connectors for intravascular or hypodermic applications)
- · ISO 80369-20: 2015, Small-bore connectors for liquids and gases in healthcare applications (Part 20: Common test methods)
This is also described in §VII. The evaluation of equivalence found it did not raise any safety or performance issues/ concerns, or raised new questions, as the materials used in the Subject device are found to have met specified requirements in the testing conducted.
### Comment #3
- The difference is evaluated insignificant even though Predicate information was unknown. Both the Subject and the Predicate devices use medical grade sterile barrier systems for their unit packaging primary materials that are suited for the EO sterilization process, the same as the applicant's previously cleared device, ProSeal™ CSTD (K192075).
- Moreover, sterile barrier package integrity testing and performance testing on the final finished Subject devices after simulated shipping and distribution per ASTM D4169-22: Standard Practice for Performance Testing of Shipping Containers and Systems were performed and found to have met the specified requirements therein (§VII-C).
### VII. Performance Data Supporting Substantial Equivalence
### A. Functional performance
The sterile, single-use, non-pyrogenic ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set described in this Summary were tested and demonstrated to be in conformance with the following ISO and FDA recognized standards:
- ANSI/AAMI CN27:2021, General requirements for Luer activated valves (LAVs) incorporated ● into medical devices for intravascular applications
- ANSI/AAMI ST72/ 2019, Bacterial endotoxins Test methods, routing monitoring, and . alternatives to batch testing
- ISO 8536-4: 2019, Infusion equipment for medical use Part 4: Infusion sets for single use, . gravity feed
- ISO 80369-7: 2016, Small-bore connectors for liquids and gases in healthcare applications-● (Part 7: Connectors for intravascular or hypodermic applications)
- ISO 80369-20: 2015, Small-bore connectors for liguids and gases in healthcare applications . (Part 20: Common test methods)
{11}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/11/Picture/0 description: The image shows a logo for EPIC. The logo is in black and white and features the word "EPIC" in a stylized font. The "E" is capitalized, and there is a circle above the "P".
#### B. Biocompatibility
In accordance with ISO 10993-1: 2018, the ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set is classified as: Externally Communicating Device, Blood Path Indirect, Prolonged Contact (>24hr to 30d). The following testing were conducted:
- Cytotoxicity ●
- Sensitization
- Intracutaneous Reactivity ●
- Acute Systemic Toxicity ●
- 14-Day Sub Acute Systemic Toxicity ●
- . In-vitro Hemolysis Assessment
- . Material Mediated Pyrogenicity
Particulate matter testing was conducted in accordance with ISO 8536-4: 2019, Infusion equipment for medical use - Part 4: Infusion sets for single use, gravity feed, Annex A.2 and USP <788> Particulate Matter in Injections.
### C. Sterility, Shipping, and Shelf-Life
The Subject device complies with sterilization requirements of ISO 11135: 2014. Sterilization of Health Care Products - Ethylene Oxide - Part 1: Requirements for Development, Validation and Routine Control of a Sterilization Process for Medical Devices.
- Simulated transportation testing per ASTM D4169-22, Standard Practice for Performance . Testing of Shipping Containers and Systems
- Package Integrity Test .
- Sterile Barrier Packaging Testing performed on the proposed device: Seal strength ASTM F88/ ● F88M-21
Shelf-life of 3 years has been validated using the FDA recognized standard, ASTM 1980-21, Standard Guide for Accelerated Aging of Sterile Barrier Systems for Medical Devices.
### VIII. Conclusion
The differences between the Predicate and the Subject device do not raise any new or different questions of safety or effectiveness. The ProSeal™ Closed System Administration Set is substantially equivalent to the Predicate, U & U Intravascular Administration Set, with respect to the indications for use, principles of operation and technological characteristics.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.