K230243 · Orthosoft D/B/A Zimmer Cas · OLO · Mar 29, 2023 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K230243
Device Name
ROSA® Knee System
Applicant
Orthosoft D/B/A Zimmer Cas
Product Code
OLO · Neurology
Decision Date
Mar 29, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.4560
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The ROSA Knee System, for use with the ROSA® RECON Platform, is indicated as a stereotaxic instrumentation system for total knee replacement (TKA) surgery. It is to assist the surgeon in providing software-defined spatial boundaries for orientation and reference information to identifiable anatomical structures for the accurate of knee implant components. The robotic arm placement is performed relative to anatomical landmarks as recorded using the system intraoperatively, and based on a surgical plan optionally determined pre-operatively using compatible X-ray or MRI based surgical planning tools. It includes a robotic arm, an optical tracking system and accessories, software system, surgical instruments and accessories. The ROSA Knee System is designed for use on skeletally mature patient population. The targeted population has the same characteristics as the population that is suitable for the implants compatible with the ROSA Knee System. The ROSA Knee System is to be used with the following fixed bearing knee replacement systems in accordance with their indications and contraindications: NexGen® CR, NexGen CR-Flex Gender, NexGen LPS, NexGen LPS-Flex, NexGen LPS-Flex Gender, Persona® CR, Persona Ti-Nidium® CR, Persona Ti-Nidium PS, Persona IQ®, Vanguard® CR, and Vanguard PS.
Device Story
ROSA Knee System is a stereotaxic robotic instrumentation system for TKA surgery. Inputs include intraoperative anatomical landmarks (via optical tracking) and optional preoperative surgical plans (from X-ray/MRI). The system uses a robotic arm to provide software-defined spatial boundaries for bone resections and implant positioning. Used in the OR by surgeons; the system assists in determining alignment axes, planning implant location, and positioning cut guides. It integrates with the Zimmer Biomet Drive Portal for case management. Benefits include precise implant placement and soft tissue assessment. The current modification adds sterile-packaged checkpoint screws (13mm, 15mm, 17mm).
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Existing performance testing for the predicate device remains applicable; no new clinical data was required for this modification.
Technological Characteristics
Stereotaxic robotic system comprising a robotic arm, optical tracking system, software, and surgical instruments. Includes new sterile-packaged disposable checkpoint screws (13mm, 15mm, 17mm). Operates via intraoperative landmark registration and preoperative planning. Connectivity via Zimmer Biomet Drive Portal.
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKA) surgery. Contraindicated in patients with significant hip pathology (bone loss, severe dysplasia, limited range of motion), active knee joint infections, or those requiring revision surgery. Also contraindicated if strong infrared sources/reflectors are present or if using incompatible implants.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left, there is a symbol representing the Department of Health & Human Services-USA. To the right, there is the FDA logo in blue, with the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" stacked on top of the word "ADMINISTRATION".
March 29, 2023
Orthosoft d/b/a Zimmer CAS Aura Corredor Regulatory Affairs Associate Specialist 75 Queen Street, Suite 3300 Montreal, OC H3C 2N6 Canada
Re: K230243
Trade/Device Name: ROSA® Knee System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4560 Regulation Name: Stereotaxic Instrument Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OLO Dated: January 27, 2023 Received: January 30, 2023
Dear Aura Corredor:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Shumaya Ali-S
Shumaya Ali, M.P.H. Assistant Director DHT6C: Division of Restorative, Repair and Trauma Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K230243
Device Name ROSA® Knee System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The ROSA Knee System, for use with the ROSA® RECON Platform, is indicated as a stereotaxic instrumentation system for total knee replacement (TKA) surgery. It is to assist the surgeon in providing software-defined spatial boundaries for orientation and reference information to identifiable anatomical structures for the accurate of knee implant components.
The robotic arm placement is performed relative to anatomical landmarks as recorded using the system intraoperatively, and based on a surgical plan optionally determined pre-operatively using compatible X-ray or MRI based surgical planning tools.
It includes a robotic arm, an optical tracking system and accessories, software system, surgical instruments and accessories.
The ROSA Knee System is designed for use on skeletally mature patient population. The targeted population has the same characteristics as the population that is suitable for the implants compatible with the ROSA Knee System.
The ROSA Knee System is to be used with the following fixed bearing knee replacement systems in accordance with their indications and contraindications: NexGen® CR, NexGen CR-Flex Gender, NexGen LPS, NexGen LPS-Flex, NexGen LPS-Flex Gender, Persona® CR, Persona Ti-Nidium® CR, Persona Ti-Nidium PS, Persona IQ®, Vanguard® CR, and Vanguard PS.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span> <td><input checked="" type="checkbox"/>Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </td></span></div> | <input checked="" type="checkbox"/> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) |
| <div> <input type="checkbox"/>Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </div> | |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary
In accordance with 21 CFR §807.92 and the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, the following information is provided for the ROSA® Knee System 510(k) premarket notification. The submission was prepared in accordance with the FDA guidance document, 'Format for Traditional and Abbreviated 510(k)s', issued on September 13, 2019.
| Sponsor: | Orthosoft, Inc. d/b/a Zimmer CAS<br>75 Queen St., Suite 3300<br>Montreal, QC, CANADA H3C 2N6<br>Establishment Registration Number: 9617840 | | | |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| Contact Person: | Aura Helena Corredor<br>Regulatory Affairs Associate Specialist<br>Telephone: 514-436-3467 | | | |
| Date: | January 27, 2023 | | | |
| Subject Device: | Trade Name: ROSA® Knee System<br>Common Name: ROSA® Knee System<br>Classification Name:<br>OLO- Orthopedic Stereotaxic Instrument (21 CFR<br>●<br>882.4560) | | | |
| Predicate Device: | Manufacturer | Device Name | 510(k) Number | |
| | Zimmer CAS | ROSA®<br>Knee<br>System | K221928 | |
| Purpose and Device | facilitate implant positioning intra-operatively. | | The ROSA® Knee System for use with the ROSA RECON<br>Platform is used to assist surgeons in performing Total Knee<br>Arthroplasty (TKA) with features to assist with the bone<br>resections as well as assessing the state of the soft tissues to | |
The ROSA® Knee System uses a Non-Device Medical Device Data System (Non-Device MDDS) called the Zimmer Biomet Drive Portal, which manages the creation and tracking of surgical cases. The cases reside on the portal until they are uploaded to the ROSA® RECON Platform before surgeries.
{4}------------------------------------------------
If the case is image-based, a 3D virtual bone model is generated pre-operatively by the PSI systems (X-PSI Knee System or CAS PSI Knee System) to create a 3D model of the patient's femur/tibia and allows the preparation of a preoperative surgical plan. An imageless option is also available where landmarks taken intra-operatively on the patient's bony anatomy are used to create the surgical plan. Accuracy of resections, knee state evaluation, and soft tissue assessment are the same between image-based and imageless options as they are always based on intraoperative landmarks.
The intraoperative workflow and surgical concepts implemented in the system remain close to the conventional TKA workflow. As such, at the time of the surgery, the system mainly assists the surgeon in (1) determining reference alignment axes in relation to anatomical landmarks, (2) planning the orthopedic implants location based on these reference alignment axes and orthopedic implant geometry (planning optionally based on a preoperative plan using pre-operative imaging), and (3) precisely positioning the cut guide relative to the planned orthopedic implant location by using a robotic arm.
The purpose of this submission is to add new disposable instruments: Sterile Checkpoint Screws Size 13mm, Size 15mm and Size 17mm. The modification considered in this 510(k) is to provide the checkpoint screws in sterile packaging to the end user.
Indications for Use: The ROSA® Knee System, for use with the ROSA RECON Platform is indicated as a stereotaxic instrumentation system for total knee replacement (TKA) surgery. It is to assist the surgeon in providing software-defined spatial boundaries for orientation and reference information to identifiable anatomical structures for the accurate placement of knee implant components.
> The robotic arm placement is performed relative to anatomical landmarks as recorded using the system intraoperatively, and based on a surgical plan; optionally determined pre-operatively using compatible X-ray or MRI based surgical planning tools.
{5}------------------------------------------------
It includes a robotic arm, an optical tracking system and accessories, software system, surgical instruments and accessories.
The ROSA Knee System is designed for use on skeletally mature patient population. The targeted population has the same characteristics as the population that is suitable for the implants compatible with the ROSA Knee System.
The ROSA Knee System is to be used with the following fixed bearing knee replacement systems in accordance with their indications and contraindications: NexGen® CR, NexGen CR-Flex, NexGen CR-Flex Gender, NexGen LPS, NexGen LPS-Flex, NexGen LPS-Flex Gender, Persona® CR, Persona PS, Persona Ti-Nidium® CR, Persona Ti-Nidium PS, Persona IQ®, Vanguard® CR, and Vanguard PS.
The ROSA® Knee System may not be suitable for use in case of:
- . hip pathology with significant bone loss (e.g. avascular necrosis of the femoral head with collapse, severe dysplasia of the femoral head or the acetabulum);
- hip pathology severely limiting range of motion (e.g. ● arthrodesis, severe contractures, chronic severe dislocation);
- active infections of the knee joint area; ●
- knee replacement revision surgery; ●
- presence of strong infrared sources or infrared ● reflectors in the vicinity of the trackers;
- contraindications for the implant as given by the ● implant manufacturer;
- implants that are not compatible with the system ●
The rationale for substantial equivalence is based on Summary of Technological Characteristics: consideration of the following characteristics:
- Intended Use: Same as predicate device
- Indications for Use: Same as predicate device
- Technological Characteristics: Same as predicate device
K230243 Page 3 of 4
Contraindications:
{6}------------------------------------------------
- . Principle of Operation: Same as predicate device
- . Instrumentation: Same as predicate device except for the addition of new disposable instruments-Sterile Checkpoint Screws Size 13mm, Size 15mm and Size 17mm which are sold in sterile packaging to end users.
## Summary of Performance Data (Nonclinical and/or Clinical)
#### Non-Clinical Tests: ●
- The existing performance testing that was O performed for the predicate device remains unchanged and is still applicable for the proposed device.
## Substantial Equivalence Conclusion:
Both the proposed device and predicate device have the same intended use and indications for use. The technological characteristics between the proposed device and predicate are identical with differences in the instrumentation where the proposed device checkpoint screws are sold in a sterile packaging to end users. In sum, any differences between the devices do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness and the proposed device is at least as safe and effective as the legally marketed predicate device. However, the information provided herein demonstrates that:
- o Any differences do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness;
- o Verification and Validation activities demonstrate that the proposed device is at least as safe and effective as the legally marketed predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.