K223355 · Graphy, Inc. · NXC · Nov 3, 2022 · Dental
Device Facts
Record ID
K223355
Device Name
Tera Harz Clear
Applicant
Graphy, Inc.
Product Code
NXC · Dental
Decision Date
Nov 3, 2022
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 872.5470
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, 3rd-Party Reviewed
Indications for Use
TERA HARZ CLEAR is intended for the treatment of tooth malocclusions in patients with permanent dentition (i.e., all second molars). Utilizing a series of increments, it sequentially positions teeth by way of continuous gentle force. TERA HARZ CLEAR is intended exclusively for professional dental work. Fabrication of aligner with TERA HARZ CLEAR requires an additive manufacturing system (AMS) that includes compatible with the following: [Table of compatible scanners, software, printers, and post-cure units provided in document].
Device Story
TERA HARZ CLEAR is a light-cured, methacrylate-based resin used to 3D print sequential dental aligners. The process begins with a clinician scanning the patient's mouth using an intraoral scanner to generate a digital model. Dental software is used to virtually plan tooth movements and design the aligner sequence as STL files. These files are sent to an additive manufacturing system (3D printer) to fabricate the aligners, which are then cured in a post-cure unit, trimmed, and polished by the clinician. The aligners are worn by the patient for 20-22 hours per day, replaced weekly to apply continuous gentle force for tooth repositioning. The device is used in professional dental settings to treat malocclusions, replacing traditional wires and brackets. It benefits patients by providing a clear, removable orthodontic appliance for dental alignment.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Substantial equivalence is supported by bench testing, including manufacturing validation and physical property testing (flexural strength, flexural modulus, water solubility, water sorption) compared against the predicate device and ISO 20795-2:2013 standards.
Technological Characteristics
Methacrylate-based photo-curable resin; polymerized via 405-412 nm UV laser. Additive manufacturing (3D printing) process; 100 µm layer thickness; 40-90 µm X/Y resolution. Biocompatible per ISO 10993-1, 3, 5, 10, 11 and ISO 7405. Requires specific compatible 3D printers (UNIZ Slash 2, SprintRay Pro 95) and post-cure units (CureM U102H).
Indications for Use
Indicated for treatment of tooth malocclusions in patients with permanent dentition (all second molars).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An orthodontic plastic bracket is a plastic device intended to be bonded to a tooth to apply pressure to a tooth from a flexible orthodontic wire to alter its position.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
November 3, 2022
Graphy Inc. % Dave Yungvirt CEO Third Party Review Group, LLC 25 Independence Blvd Warren, New Jersey 07059
Re: K223355
Trade/Device Name: Tera Harz Clear Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.5470 Regulation Name: Orthodontic plastic bracket Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NXC Dated: October 30, 2022 Received: November 2, 2022
Dear Dave Yungvirt:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Michael E. Adjodha, M.ChE. Assistant Director DHT1B: Division of Dental and ENT Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K-223355
Device Name TERA HARZ CLEAR
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
TERA HARZ CLEAR is intended for the treatment of tooth malocclusions in patients with permanent dentition (i.e., all second molars). Utilizing a series of increments, it sequentially positions teeth by way of continuous gentle force. TERA HARZ CLEAR is intended exclusively for professional dental work. Fabrication of aligner with TERA HARZ CLEAR requires an additive manufacturing system (AMS) that includes compatible with the following:
| | Brand | Type |
|-----------------|----------------|----------------------|
| Design: | | |
| Scanner | 3Shape A/S | TRIOS 3 Basic |
| Design software | 3Shape A/S | 3Shape Ortho System™ |
| Printing: | | |
| 3D Printer | UNIZ | SLASH 2 |
| | SprintRay Inc. | SprintRay Pro 95 |
| Post-Curing: | | |
| Post-cure unit | CureM | U102H |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
|X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# K223355
# 510(k) Summary For TERA HARZ CLEAR
#### l. SUBMISSION SPONSOR
Graphy Inc. #603, #617, Ace Gasan Forhu, 225, Gasan digital 1-ro, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea Office Phone: +82-2-864-3056 Fax: 82-2-864-3057 Contact Person: Mr. Moon Soo Park, Assistant Manager of RA Team
#### II. SUBMISSION CORRESPONDENT
SMB Korea #606, #607, 7, Boramae-ro 5ga-gil, Donjak-gu, Seoul, 07071, Republic of Korea Cell Phone: +82-10-2247-5579 Office Phone: +62-6241-9001 Kyung-hwan Kim, Representative Consultant, QA Contact: Email: info@smbkorea.com
#### III. DATE PREPARED
October 20, 2022
#### IV. DEVICE
| Trade or Proprietary Name: | TERA HARZ CLEAR |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Common or Usual Name: | Sequential Aligner |
| Classification Name: | Orthodontic plastic bracket (872.5470) |
| Regulatory Class: | II |
| Product Code: | NXC |
| Classification Panel: | Dental |
#### V. PREDICATE DEVICE
Primary Predicate Device: K180107, Blue Sky Bio Aligner/ Blue Sky Bio LLC (Class II) Referencee Device Dental LT Clear Resin (V2)/ Formlabs Inc. (Class I)
#### DEVICE DESCRIPTION
TERA HARZ CLEAR is a series of clear aligners that are used to replace traditional
{4}------------------------------------------------
orthodontic wires and brackets for the alignment of maloccluded or misaligned teeth.
This series of aligner is intended for the treatment of tooth malocclusions in patients with permanent dentition (i.e., all second molars) by moves the teeth gently, and in small increments, from their original to their final treated position for improved dental alignment. This series of aligner is worn for approximately 1 week of 20 to 22 hours per day after (However, there are to be removed for eating and for cleaning) which it is replaced by the next stage aligners and are designed to be used in a sequence. This is repeated for duration as prescribed by the dental clinician.
TERA HARZ CLEAR is a light-cured, methacrylate-based resin commonly can used in additive manufacturing for the production of dental structures such as sequential aligners.
TERA HARZ CLEAR has stored in a black 1,000 g of HDPE bottle. It contains materials with colors of yellowish. This device is a liquid photo-curable material that is polymerized by UV laser at 405~412 nm. It can be used to make a tooth model with a photo-curable polymer that is cured by ultraviolet light. The liquid UV curing resin is cured at a specific wavelength (395~405 nm) by the photo-initiator contained in the resin. It is typically 100 um in thickness and is output at a resolution of 40 to 90 µm on the x, y axis, and it is possible to produce three-dimensional printed matter by curing lamination step by step a thickness of 100 um.
However, scanner, design software, 3D printer and post-cure unit are not included with the device.
These fabrications of TERA HARZ CLEAR are beginning with the dental clinician prescribing aligners to treat a patient's malocclusion, and decision to use methacrylatebased resins is made by the dental clinician. TERA HARZ CLEAR, an orthodontic appliance such as sequential aligner, is manufactured in a 3D printer that is compatible.
The dental clinician can generate a digital file by scanning the patient's mouth directly using listed with Intraoral scanner under FDA Classification Product Code NOF, regulation 872.3661.
This digital file is a series of CAD files (.stl) for building models that can be used to fabricate aligners. Commonly used standard dental software is used by dental professionals to virtually design a sequential aligner and generate an industry-standard "STL" 3D dataset which reflects the intended shape and contour. The design software used is 3Shape Ortho System™ by 3Shape A/S (K180941). The specialized orthodontic treatment planning software has a 510k clearance for the intended use under FDA
{5}------------------------------------------------
Classification Product Code PNN, regulation 872.5470. This software is used for management of 3D scanned orthodontic models, orthodontic diagnosis by measuring, analyzing, inspecting and visualizing 3D scanned orthodontic models, virtual planning of orthodontic treatments by simulating tooth movements, and design of sequential aligners based on 3D scanned orthodontic models.
Once dental clinic manufacturing unit receive the data that *.stl CAD files of the treatment plan the 3D printer begins additive manufacturing. The dental clinician generates sequential 3D printed models replicating the approved treatment plan. The sequential aligner is 3D printed and cured in a post-cure unit. The fabricated aligners are cut to fit dentition, the cleaned and polished to remove rough edges by the dental clinician. The prescribing physician review and approves the sequential aligners are provides them to the patient the confirming fit and design.
#### VI. INDICATION FOR USE
TERA HARZ CLEAR is intended for the treatment of tooth malocclusions in patients with permanent dentition (i.e., all second molars). Utilizing a series of incremental tooth movements, it sequentially positions teeth by way of continuous gentle force. TERA HARZ CLEAR is intended exclusively for professional dental work. Fabrication of aligner with TERA HARZ CLEAR requires an additive manufacturing system (AMS) that includes compatible with the following:
| | Brand | Type |
|--------------------------------|----------------|-----------------------|
| Design: | | |
| Intraoral scanner | 3Shape A/S | TRIOS 3 Basic |
| Design software | 3Shape A/S | 3Shape Ortho System™™ |
| Additive Manufacturing System: | | |
| 3D Printer | UNIZ | SLASH 2 |
| | SprintRay Inc. | SprintRay Pro 95 |
| Post-Curing: | | |
| Post-cure unit | CureM | U102H |
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### VII. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
The indications for use and mechanism of action of subject device is identical to the predicate device and supports a determination of substantial equivalence.
However, there is a main difference in the predicate device because the materials of use and the manufacturing process are differed.
So, Dental LT Clear Resin (V2) is selected as a reference device to support method of processing and raw material.
So that, TERA HARZ CLEAR performed testing as that of each predicate device. All test results of Flexural Strength, Flexural Modulus,Water Solubility, and Water Sorption was similar to that of the predicate device that meet the requirements of ISO 20795-2:2013. The performance characteristics of the TERA HARZ CLEAR are comparable to those of the predicate device for this particular indication and raise no new or different questions of safety and effectiveness. Therefore, the subject device and the predicate device are substantially equivalent in physical properties.
Any differences in technology characteristics are accompanied by information that demonstrated the device is as safe and as effective as the predicate device and do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness than the predicate.
It was concluded, therefore, that the technological differences do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness.
| | SUBJECT Device | Primary PREDICATE<br>Device (K180107) | REFERENCE Device | Significant Difference |
|-------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Manufacturer | Graphy Inc. | Blue Sky Bio LLC | Formlabs Inc. | - |
| Trade Name | TERA HARZ CLEAR | Blue Sky Bio Aligner | Dental LT Clear Resin<br>(V2) | - |
| Device Classification<br>Name | aligner, sequential | aligner, sequential | MAINTAINER, SPACE<br>PREFORMED,<br>ORTHODONTIC | - |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 872.5470 | 21 CFR 872.5470 | 21 CFR 872.5525 | Predicate device :<br>same<br>Reference device :<br>different |
| Product Code | NXC | NXC | DYT, KMY | Predicate device :<br>same<br>Reference device :<br>different. |
| Class | II | II | | Predicate device :<br>same<br>Reference device :<br>different. |
{7}------------------------------------------------
| | SUBJECT Device | Primary PREDICATE | REFERENCE Device | Significant Difference |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | | Device (K180107) | | |
| Manufacturer | Graphy Inc. | Blue Sky Bio LLC | Formlabs Inc. | – |
| Indications for Use | TERA HARZ CLEAR is<br>intended for the<br>treatment of tooth<br>malocclusions in patients<br>with permanent dentition<br>(i.e., all second molars).<br>Utilizing a series of<br>incremental tooth<br>movements, it<br>sequentially positions<br>teeth by way of<br>continuous gentle force.<br>TERA HARZ CLEAR is<br>intended exclusively for<br>professional dental<br>work. Fabrication of<br>aligner with TERA HARZ<br>CLEAR requires an<br>additive manufacturing<br>system (AMS)<br>that<br>includes compatible with<br>the following: | Blue Sky Bio Aligners<br>are a series of clear,<br>lightweight, plastic<br>appliances indicated for<br>the treatment of tooth<br>malocclusions in<br>patients with permanent<br>dentition<br>(i.e., all second molars).<br>Utilizing a series of<br>incremental tooth<br>movements, it<br>sequentially positions<br>teeth by way of<br>continuous gentle force. | Dental LT Clear Resin<br>(V2) enables dental<br>practices and labs to<br>rapidly manufacture a<br>range of dental products<br>in-house, from<br>biocompatible surgical<br>guides and splints to<br>fixed prosthetic and<br>clear aligner models. | Similarities: Indications<br>for use of the subject<br>device is slightly<br>different from the<br>predicate device in<br>phrase but fundamental<br>indication is the<br>identical. However, the<br>reference device is<br>different. |
| Mechanism of Action | Orthodontic tooth<br>movement occurs<br>through forces applied<br>to the teeth by the<br>appliance to the<br>dentition as each tooth<br>follows the programmed<br>displacement based on<br>a dental health<br>professional's<br>prescription. | The mechanism of<br>action is similar to the<br>predicate devices and<br>supports a<br>determination of<br>substantial equivalence.<br>Orthodontic tooth<br>movement occurs<br>through forces applied<br>to the teeth by the<br>appliance to the<br>dentition as each tooth<br>follows the programmed<br>displacement based on a<br>dental health<br>professional's<br>prescription | Unknown | Similarities:<br>Mechanism of action of<br>the subject device is<br>identical from the<br>predicate device.<br>however, reference<br>device is unknown. |
| | SUBJECT Device | Primary PREDICATE<br>Device (K180107) | REFERENCE Device | Significant Difference |
| Manufacturer | Graphy Inc. | Blue Sky Bio LLC | Formlabs Inc. | – |
| In Use Duration | Aligners are worn for approximately 1 week<br>of 20-22 hours of wear per day, after which itis<br>replaced by the next stage aligners. This is<br>repeated for duration as prescribed by the<br>dental clinician. | Unknown | Unknown | Difference: Because the predicate device and<br>reference device are unknown, we concluded that the<br>predicate device and the subject device are different. |
| Materials of Use | Methacrylate-based resins | Essix Thermoplastic resins | Methacrylate-based resins | Difference: The predicate device and subject device is<br>different. However reference device is similar in<br>Methacrylate-based resins.<br>so Dental LT Clear Resin(V2) is selected as a reference<br>device to support raw material. |
| Manufacturing<br>Technology | Additive | Thermoforming | Additive | Difference: The predicate device and subject device is<br>different. since there are no products in the market that<br>have the same manufacturing process as our aligners,<br>Dental LT Clear Resin (V2) is selected as a reference<br>device to support manufacturing process. |
| | SUBJECT Device | Primary PREDICATE<br>Device (K180107) | REFERENCE Device | Significant Difference |
| Manufacturer | Graphy Inc. | Blue Sky Bio LLC | Formlabs Inc. | – |
| Design | Image: Subject Device Design | Image: Primary Predicate Device Design | Image: Reference Device Design | Similarities: The arch<br>shape does not<br>introduce any<br>additional safety or<br>efficacy concerns.<br>Dimensions of the arch<br>form are in the same<br>range. |
| Performance Testing | ISO 20795-2:2013 | Does not apply. | ISO and ASTM | Similarities: This does<br>not introduce<br>additional safety or<br>efficacy concerns<br>because subject device<br>and predicate device<br>meet some<br>requirements from ISO<br>20795-2:2013. |
| Surface characteristics | Testing of 5 samples,<br>same lot with 2 kind of<br>3d printer(UNIZ Slash2 ,<br>SprintRay pro95)<br>The surface of the<br>sample was smooth,<br>hard and glossy; | The surface of the<br>sample was smooth,<br>hard and glossy. | Unknown | Similarities:<br>The specifications of<br>predicate device are in<br>the same range. This<br>minor variance does not<br>introduce additional<br>safety or efficacy<br>concerns because both<br>devices meet<br>requirements from ISO<br>20795-2:2013. |
| | SUBJECT Device | Primary PREDICATE | REFERENCE Device | Significant Difference |
| | | Device (K180107) | | |
| Manufacturer | Graphy Inc. | Blue Sky Bio LLC | Formlabs Inc. | - |
| Shape capability | Testing of 5 samples,<br>same lot with 2 kinds of<br>3d printer (UNIZ Slash2 ,<br>SprintRay pro95)<br><br>Sample edges<br>were<br>reproduced; | Sample edges<br>were<br>reproduced. | Unknown | Similarities:<br>The specifications of<br>predicate device are in<br>the same range. This<br>minor variance does<br>not introduce<br>additional safety or<br>efficacy concerns<br>because both devices<br>meetrequirements<br>from ISO 20795-<br>2:2013. |
| Colour | Testing of 5 samples,<br>same lot with 2 kind of<br>3d printer (UNIZ Slash2 ,<br>SprintRay pro95)<br><br>The color was<br>expressed<br>transparently<br>without changing; | The color was<br>expressed<br>transparently<br>without changing. | Unknown | Similarities:<br>The specifications of<br>predicate device are in<br>the same range. This<br>minor variance does<br>not introduce<br>additional safety or<br>efficacy concerns<br>because both devices<br>meetrequirements<br>from ISO 20795-<br>2:2013. |
{8}------------------------------------------------
{9}------------------------------------------------
{10}------------------------------------------------
{11}------------------------------------------------
| | SUBJECT Device | Primary PREDICATE<br>Device (K180107) | REFERENCE Device | Significant Difference |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Manufacturer | Graphy Inc. | Blue Sky Bio LLC | Formlabs Inc. | – |
| Freedom from porosity | Testing of 5 samples,<br>same lot with 2 kind of<br>3d printer (UNIZ Slash2,<br>SprintRay pro95)<br><br>There is no porosity; | There is no porosity. | Unknown. | Similarities:<br>The specifications of<br>predicate device are in<br>the same range. This<br>minor variance does<br>not introduce<br>additional safety or<br>efficacy concerns<br>because both devices<br>meet requirements<br>from ISO 20795-<br>2:2013. |
| Ultimate Flexural Strength<br>(≥5 MPa) | Testing of 5 samples,<br>same lot with 2 kind of<br>3d printer (UNIZ Slash2,<br>SprintRay pro95)<br><br>Uniz<br>Avg. 5.91 MPa;<br><br>SprintRay pro 95<br>Avg. 6.04 MPa | Avg. 5.17 MPa | Unknown | Similarities:<br>The ultimate flexural<br>strength of subject<br>device is equivalent to<br>or better than the<br>predicate device<br>because the average<br>value of the subject<br>device' ultimate<br>flexural strength was<br>statistically significantly<br>higher than that of the<br>predicate device.<br>This minor variance<br>does not introduce<br>additionalsafety or<br>efficacy concerns<br>because both devices<br>meet requirements<br>from ISO 20795-<br>2:2013. |
{12}------------------------------------------------
| | SUBJECT Device | Primary PREDICATE<br>Device (K180107) | REFERENCE Device | Significant Difference |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Manufacturer | Graphy Inc. | Blue Sky Bio LLC | Formlabs Inc. | – |
| Flexural modulus<br>(≥50 MPa) | Testing of 5 samples,<br>same lot with 2 3d<br>printer (UNIZSlash2,<br>SprintRay pro 95)<br>Uniz<br>Avg. 69.10 MPa;<br>SprintRay pro 95<br>Avg. 72.37 MPa | Avg. 56.26 MPa | Unknown | Similarities:<br>The ultimate flexural<br>strength of subject<br>device is equivalent to<br>or better than the<br>predicate because the<br>average value of the<br>subject device'<br>ultimate flexural<br>strength was<br>statistically significantly<br>higher than that of<br>the predicate device.<br>This minor variance<br>does not introduce<br>additional safety or<br>efficacy concerns<br>because both devices<br>meet requirements<br>from ISO 20795-2:2013. |
{13}------------------------------------------------
| | SUBJECT Device | Primary PREDICATE<br>Device (K180107) | REFERENCE Device | Significant Difference |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Manufacturer | Graphy Inc. | Blue Sky Bio LLC | Formlabs Inc. | – |
| Solubility<br>(≤5 µg/mm3) | Testing of 5 samples,<br>same lot with 2 kind of<br>3d printer(UNIZ Slash2 ,<br>SprintRay pro95)<br>Uniz<br>Avg. 1.53 µg/mm3;<br>SprintRay pro 95<br>Avg. 1.55 µg/mm3 | Avg. 1.67 µg/mm3 | Unknown | Similarities:<br>The specifications of<br>predicate device are in<br>the same range.<br>This minor variance<br>does not introduce<br>additional safety or<br>efficacy concerns<br>because both devices<br>meet requirements<br>from ISO 20795-2:2013. |
| Water sorption<br>(≤32 µg/mm3) | Testing of 5 samples,<br>same lot with 2 kind of<br>3d printer(UNIZ Slash2 ,<br>SprintRay pro95)<br>Uniz<br>Avg. 17.44 µg/mm3;<br>SprintRay pro 95<br>Avg. 17.02 µg/mm3 | Avg. 17.51 µg/mm3 | Unknown | Similarities:<br>The specifications of<br>predicate device are in<br>the same range.<br>This minor variance<br>does not introduce<br>additional safety or<br>efficacy concerns<br>because both devices<br>meet requirements<br>from ISO 20795-2:2013. |
{14}------------------------------------------------
| | SUBJECT Device | Primary PREDICATE<br>Device (K180107) | REFERENCE Device<br>(K203000) | Significant Difference |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Manufacturer | Graphy Inc. | Blue Sky Bio LLC | Formlabs Inc. | – |
| Appearance | Testing of 5 samples, same lot with 2 kind of 3d printer(UNIZ Slash2 , SprintRay pro95)<br>No evidence of foreign materials, contaminations,or any other defects that should be hazardous uponthe usage. | No evidence of foreign materials, contaminations, or any other defects that should be hazardous upon the usage. | Unknown | No difference. |
| Precision<br>(The standard deviation<br>is less than 0.150) | Testing of 5 samples, same lot with 2 kind of 3d printer(UNIZ Slash2 , SprintRay pro95)<br>Uniz<br>Avg.0.072/mm<br>SprintRay pro 95<br>Avg.0.065/mm | Avg. 0.122/mm | Unknown | Similarities:<br>The precision of subject device is equivalent to or better than the predicate device because the average value of the subject device' precision was statistically significantly lower than that of the predicate device. |
| Biocompatibility | Biocompatible according to ISO 10993-1 | The material used for the Blue Sky Bio aligners has a 510k clearance as an aligner material ,so no biocompatibility testing was performed. | Biocompatible according to ISO 10993-1 | No difference. |
| OTC or Rx | Rx | Rx | Rx | No difference. |
| Sterile | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | No difference. |
{15}------------------------------------------------
### VIII. PERFORMANCE DATA
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
### Manufacturing Validation
A manufacturing validation was performed to demonstrate the manufacturing process for TERA HARZ CLEAR.
An independent 3rd party software and digital calipers were used to perform point-to- point and critical displacement measurement. All translational measurements were within 0.150 mm of the target input value, the predefined tolerance of the manufacturing process. There were no statistical differences in the difference in the intended and measured values observed from any of the groups. This test has met the pre-established acceptance criteria.
And the test also conducted studies on the effect of manufacturing validation and material reuse on the properties of the final finished device according to FDA's published guidance documents, "Technical Considerations for Additive Manufactured Medical Devices".
The TERA HARZ CLEAR were outputted by each different output condition and each flexural strength were measured and the evaluation criteria of the all the specimens were more than 50 MPa. The optimal output condition is that the output angle is 30°, and the output position is centered to confirming that the optimal condition is to be output.
In addition, it was confirmed that there was no problem in the number of effective outputs for repeated material output up to 7 times.
## Performance Testing
Bench testing was performed to ensure the accuracy of the final product carried through the entire process from the initial intraoral scan through treatment planning and manufacturing process of the final finished aligner.
In addition, bench testing was conducted on both the subject device and the predicate device (Blue Sky Bio Aligner, K180107) to evaluate critical properties including Flexural Strength, Flexural Modulus, Water Solubility, Water absorption and etc. All met the requirements of ISO 20795-2:2013, Dentistry - Base Polymers -Part 2: Orthodontic base polymers.
{16}------------------------------------------------
This page is intentionally blank
{17}------------------------------------------------
# TERA HARZ CLEAR
| | Representative<br>sample | (Model/type TC-85DAC)<br>3D Printer | | Blue Sky Bio<br>Aligner | |
|----|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Test Item | UNIZ Slash 2 | SprintRay<br>PRO 95 | Blue Sky Bio<br>Aligner | Test criteria |
| 1. | Surface<br>characteristics | Sample<br>surface is<br>smooth, hard<br>and glossy. | Sample<br>surface is<br>smooth, hard<br>and glossy. | Sample<br>surface is<br>smooth, hard<br>and glossy. | surface is smooth,<br>hard, and glossy |
| 2. | Shape<br>capability | Sample edges<br>are<br>reproduced. | Sample edges<br>are<br>reproduced. | Sample edges<br>are<br>reproduced. | edges are<br>reproduced |
| 3. | Colour | The color is<br>expressed<br>transparently<br>without<br>changing. | The color is<br>expressed<br>transparently<br>without<br>changing. | The color is<br>expressed<br>transparently<br>without<br>changing. | the color is<br>expressed<br>transparently<br>without changing |
| 4. | Freedom from<br>porosity | There is no<br>porosity. | There is no<br>porosity. | There is no<br>porosity. | there is no<br>porosity |
| 5. | Ultimate<br>Flexural<br>Strength<br>(MPa) | Avg. 5.92 | Avg. 6.02 | Avg. 5.17 | ≥5 MPa |
| 6. | Flexural modulus<br>(MPa) | Avg. 69.10 | Avg. 72.38 | Avg. 56.26 | ≥50 MPa |
| 7. | Solubility | Avg. 1.54 | Avg. 1.56 | Avg. 1.67 | ≤5 µg/mm³ |
| 8. | Water sorption<br>(≤32 µg/mm³) | Avg. 17.45 | Avg. 17.03 | Avg. 17.51 | ≤32 µg/mm³ |
| 9. | Precision | 1) 0.079/mm<br>2) 0.075/mm<br>3) 0.069/mm<br>4) 0.068/mm<br>5) 0.071/mm | 1) 0.063/mm<br>2) 0.069/mm<br>3) 0.065/mm<br>4) 0.071/mm<br>5) 0.059/mm | 1) 0.102/mm<br>2) 0.139/mm<br>3) 0.108/mm<br>4) 0.137/mm<br>5) 0.125/mm | less than 0.15 |
{18}------------------------------------------------
As a result, TERA HARZ CLEAR tested with two types of 3D prints and predicate device met the tests criteria according to ISO 20795-2:2013, Dentistry – Base Polymers – Part 2: Orthodontic base polymers.
The result of the performance comparison test demonstrates that TERA HARZ CLEAR is substantially equivalent to the predicate device in physical properties. Both devices meet requirements of ISO 20795-2:2013.
#### Biocompatibility
A biocompatibility discussion was conducted. The TERA HARZ CLEAR uses the methacrylate-based resin, and this material has been tested and shown to be compliant with the following standards:
- | EN ISO 7405:2018, Dentistry – Evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry
- -EN ISO 10993-1:2018, Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing
- -EN ISO 10993-3:2014, Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 3: Tests for genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity
- EN ISO 10993-5:2009, Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity
- -EN ISO 10993-10:2013, Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization
- -EN ISO 10993-11:2018, Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 11: Tests for systemic toxicity
#### IX. CLINICAL DATA
Clinical performance data was not provided for TERA HARZ CLEAR.
### X. CONCLUSIONS
The TERA HARZ CLEAR is very similar to the predicate device and demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate device K180107 in physical properties.
An analysis for subject device compared to the predicate device show TERA HARZ CLEAR and the Blue Sky Bio Aligner meet the requirements of Manufacturing Validation, all two devices share the same product code, meet the requirements, and all two are biocompatible.
In addition, an analysis for subject device compared to the predicate device show TERA HARZ CLEAR and the Blue Sky Bio Aligner meet the requirements of ISO 20795-2:2013, Dentistry – Base Polymers – Part 2: Orthodontic base polymers. All two devices meet or exceed the minimum strength requirements, and all two are biocompatible.
Any differences between subject device and the predicate device are material of use and method of processing. So reference device, which has same method of processing and is similar in material of use, is added to support material of use and method of processing.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.