K223208 · Suzhou Zhenwu Medical Co., Ltd. · FMK · Feb 10, 2023 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K223208
Device Name
Safety Lancet
Applicant
Suzhou Zhenwu Medical Co., Ltd.
Product Code
FMK · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Feb 10, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4850
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The safety lancet is intended for capillary blood sampling.
Device Story
Safety lancet for capillary blood sampling; single-use, disposable device. Comprises needle core, protective cap, plug, trigger, spring, outer case, and end cap. Operation: user pulls off protective cap, triggers device to puncture skin; needle automatically retracts into housing post-activation to prevent accidental needle sticks. Used in clinical or home settings by patients or healthcare providers. Benefits: provides safe, sterile blood sampling while minimizing sharps injury risk.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical testing performed. Evidence consists of bench testing and simulated clinical use testing on 500 samples per FDA guidance for sharps injury prevention features. Testing verified cap removal force, needle firmness, drop resistance, puncture force, and safety feature activation.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: PE (needle core), SUS304 (needle), ABS (housing/trigger), TPE (plug), SWC (spring). Sterilization: Gamma radiation (SAL 10^-6). Dimensions: 18G-30G needles, 1.2-2.4mm penetration depth. Standards: ISO 7864:2016 (puncture force/needle firmness), ISO 9626:2016 (tubing), ISO 23908:2011 (sharps injury prevention), ISO 10993 (biocompatibility), ISO 11137 (sterilization).
Indications for Use
Indicated for capillary blood sampling in adults and pediatrics. If user is under 18, must be used by an adult or under adult supervision.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
The regulation covers four types of blood lancets: (a) Single use only blood lancet with an integral sharps injury prevention feature; (b) Single use only blood lancet without an integral sharps injury prevention feature; (c) Multiple use blood lancet for single patient use only; and (d) Multiple use blood lancet for multiple patient use. All are defined as disposable or reusable devices comprised of a blade attached to a base used to puncture the skin to obtain a drop of blood for diagnostic purposes.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the structure and material composition are consistent with the intended use and must include a sharps injury prevention feature.
(ii) Mechanical performance testing must demonstrate that the device will withstand forces encountered during use and that the integral sharps injury prevention feature will irreversibly disable the device after one use.
(iii) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(iv) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of any device component that breaches the skin (
*e.g.,* blade).(v) Labeling must include:
(A) Detailed descriptions, with illustrations, of the proper use of the device and its sharps injury prevention feature.
(B) Handwashing instructions for the user before and after use of the device.
(C) Instructions on preparation (
*e.g.,* cleaning, disinfection) of the skin to be pierced.(D) Instructions for the safe disposal of the device.
(E) Labeling must be appropriate for the intended use environment.
(
*1* ) For those devices intended for health care settings, labeling must address the health care facility use of these devices, including how these lancets are to be used with personal protective equipment, such as gloves.(
*2* ) For those devices intended for use in the home, labeling must be written so that it is understandable to lay users.(vi) Labeling must also include the following statements, prominently placed:
(A) “For use only on a single patient. Discard the entire device after use.”
(B) “Warning: Not intended for more than one use. Do not use on more than one patient. Improper use of blood lancets can increase the risk of inadvertent transmission of bloodborne pathogens, particularly in settings where multiple patients are tested.”
(b)
*Single use only blood lancet without an integral sharps injury prevention feature* —(1)*Identification.* A disposable blood lancet intended for a single use that is comprised of a single use blade attached to a solid, non-reusable base that is used to puncture the skin to obtain a drop of blood for diagnostic purposes.(2)
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the structure and material composition are consistent with the intended use and address the risk of sharp object injuries and bloodborne pathogen transmissions.
(ii) Mechanical performance testing must demonstrate that the device will withstand forces encountered during use.
(iii) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(iv) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of any device component that breaches the skin (
*e.g.,* blade).(v) Labeling must include:
(A) Detailed descriptions, with illustrations, of the proper use of the device.
(B) Handwashing instructions for the user before and after use of the device.
(C) Instructions on preparation (
*e.g.,* cleaning, disinfection) of the skin to be pierced.(D) Instructions for the safe disposal of the device.
(E) Labeling must be appropriate for the intended use environment.
(
*1* ) For those devices intended for health care settings, labeling must address the health care facility use of these devices, including how these lancets are to be used with personal protective equipment, such as gloves.(
*2* ) For those devices intended for use in the home, labeling must be written so that it is understandable to lay users.(vi) Labeling must also include the following statements, prominently placed:
(A) “For use only on a single patient. Discard the entire device after use.”
(B) “Warning: Not intended for more than one use. Do not use on more than one patient. Improper use of blood lancets can increase the risk of inadvertent transmission of bloodborne pathogens, particularly in settings where multiple patients are tested.”
(c)
*Multiple use blood lancet for single patient use only* —(1)*Identification.* A multiple use capable blood lancet intended for use on a single patient that is comprised of a single use blade attached to a solid, reusable base that is used to puncture the skin to obtain a drop of blood for diagnostic purposes.(2)
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that:
(A) The lancet blade can be changed with every use, either manually or by triggering a blade storage unit to discard the used blade and reload an unused blade into the reusable base; and
(B) The structure and material composition are consistent with the intended use and address the risk of sharp object injuries and bloodborne pathogen transmissions and allow for validated cleaning and disinfection.
(ii) Mechanical performance testing must demonstrate that the device will withstand forces encountered during use.
(iii) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(iv) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of any device component that breaches the skin (
*e.g.,* blade).(v) Validation testing must demonstrate that the cleaning and disinfection instructions are adequate to ensure that the reusable lancet base can be cleaned and low level disinfected.
(vi) Labeling must include:
(A) Detailed descriptions, with illustrations, of the proper use of the device.
(B) The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registered disinfectant's contact time for disinfectant use.
(C) Handwashing instructions for the user before and after use of the device.
(D) Instructions on preparation (
*e.g.,* cleaning, disinfection) of the skin to be pierced.(E) Instructions on the cleaning and disinfection of the device.
(F) Instructions for the safe disposal of the device.
(G) Instructions for use must address the safe storage of the reusable blood lancet base between uses to minimize contamination or damage and the safe storage and disposal of the refill lancet blades.
(H) Labeling must be appropriate for the intended use environment.
(
*1* ) For those devices intended for health care settings, labeling must address the health care facility use of these devices, including how these lancets are to be used with personal protective equipment, such as gloves.(
*2* ) For those devices intended for use in the home, labeling must be written so that it is understandable to lay users.(vii) Labeling must also include the following statements, prominently placed:
(A) “For use only on a single patient. Disinfect reusable components according to manufacturer's instructions between each use.”
(B) “Used lancet blades must be safely discarded after a single use.”
(C) “Warning: Do not use on more than one patient. Improper use of blood lancets can increase the risk of inadvertent transmission of bloodborne pathogens, particularly in settings where multiple patients are tested. The cleaning and disinfection instructions for this device are intended only to reduce the risk of local use site infection; they cannot render this device safe for use for more than one patient.”
(d)
*Multiple use blood lancet for multiple patient use* —(1)*Identification.* A multiple use capable blood lancet intended for use on multiple patients that is comprised of a single use blade attached to a solid, reusable base that is used to puncture the skin to obtain a drop of blood for diagnostic purposes.(2)
*Classification.* Class III (premarket approval).(3)
*Date PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required:* A PMA or a notice of completion of a PDP is required to be filed with the Food and Drug Administration on or before May 22, 2024, for any multiple use blood lancet for multiple patient use described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, or that has, on or before May 22, 2024, been found to be substantially equivalent to a multiple use blood lancet for multiple patient use described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976. Any other multiple use blood lancet for multiple patient use shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA acronym along with the full name of the agency on the right. The FDA part of the logo is in blue, with the acronym in a square and the full name, "U.S. Food & Drug Administration," written out next to it.
February 10, 2023
Suzhou Zhenwu Medical Co., Ltd. % Evan Hu Marketing & Technical Manager Shanghai Mind-link Consulting Co., Ltd. 1399 Jiangyue Road, Minhang Shanghai. 201114 China
Re: K223208
Trade/Device Name: Safety Lancet Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4850 Regulation Name: Blood Lancets Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FMK Dated: January 19, 2023 Received: January 19, 2023
Dear Evan Hu:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Jessica Carr -S
for Long Chen, PhD Assistant Director DHT4A: Division of General Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K223208
Device Name Safety Lancet
Indications for Use (Describe)
The safety lancet is intended for capillary blood sampling.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
_ | Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
X Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An aqency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# K223208 510(K) SUMMARY
## 1. Preparation date: 1/27/2023
## 2. Submitter
Manufacturer: Suzhou Zhenwu Medical Co., Ltd. Address: No.248, Chijiawan Road, Beishe Town, Fenhu Development Area, Wujiang District, Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA Contact person: Kai Xu, General Manager, Tel: +86051263230688, zhenwu999xk@163.com Submission correspondent: Evan Hu, 86-18616124827, Evan.hu@mind-link.net
## 3. Device
Trading name: Safety Lancet Common name: Safety Lancet Classification Name: Single Use Only Blood Lancet With an Integral Sharps Injury Prevention Feature Classification: Class II Product code: FMK
## 4. Predicate device
Predicate device: Tianjin Huahong Safety Lancet– K220370
## 5. Device description
The safety lancet consists of needle core, protective cap, plug, trigger, spring, outer case and end cap. The sterile part of the safety lancet is the needle tip. The sterile barrier is the needle sleeve and sterilized to a SAL of 10° by radiation sterilization. It is intended for single use only. The shelf-life of the product is 5 years.
The safety lancet is intended for capillary blood sampling. The device was designed to minimize the risk from accidental needle sticks with a used needle by application of a sharp injury prevention feature. The needle tip back into the safety lancet body automatically after launch and cannot be reused. The safety lancet can be disposed safely.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows a diagram of a device being assembled in four steps. In the first step, a rectangular piece is being placed on top of a cylindrical device. In the second step, the rectangular piece is being pushed down into the cylindrical device. In the third step, a small object is being inserted into the rectangular piece. In the fourth step, the device is fully assembled.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the working principle
| No. | Gauge | Needle Diameter(mm) | | Exposed Needle Length(mm) | | Color |
|-----|-----------|---------------------|-------|---------------------------|-----------|--------------|
| | | ODMIN | ODMAX | Length | Tolerance | |
| 1 | 30G | 0.298 | 0.320 | 1.2 | $\pm$ 0.3 | peacock blue |
| 2 | 30G | 0.298 | 0.320 | 1.6 | $\pm$ 0.3 | peacock blue |
| 3 | 30G | 0.298 | 0.320 | 1.8 | $\pm$ 0.3 | peacock blue |
| 4 | 28G | 0.349 | 0.370 | 1.8 | $\pm$ 0.3 | purple |
| 5 | 26G | 0.440 | 0.470 | 1.8 | $\pm$ 0.3 | yellow |
| 6 | 23G | 0.600 | 0.673 | 1.8 | $\pm$ 0.3 | Orange |
| 7 | 23G | 0.600 | 0.673 | 2.2 | $\pm$ 0.3 | Orange |
| 8 | 23G | 0.600 | 0.673 | 2.4 | $\pm$ 0.3 | Orange |
| 9 | 21G | 0.800 | 0.830 | 1.8 | $\pm$ 0.3 | Blue |
| 10 | 21G | 0.800 | 0.830 | 2.0 | $\pm$ 0.3 | Blue |
| 11 | 21G | 0.800 | 0.830 | 2.2 | $\pm$ 0.3 | Blue |
| 12 | 21G | 0.800 | 0.830 | 2.4 | $\pm$ 0.3 | Blue |
| 13 | 21G Blade | 0.800 | 0.830 | 2.0 | $\pm$ 0.3 | Bottle green |
| 14 | 21G Blade | 0.800 | 0.830 | 2.2 | $\pm$ 0.3 | Bottle green |
| 15 | 21G Blade | 0.800 | 0.830 | 2.4 | $\pm$ 0.3 | Bottle green |
| 16 | 18G | 1.200 | 1.300 | 2.0 | $\pm$ 0.3 | Rose |
| 17 | 18G | 1.200 | 1.300 | 2.2 | $\pm$ 0.3 | Rose |
| 18 | 18G | 1.200 | 1.300 | 2.4 | $\pm$ 0.3 | Rose |
| 19 | 18G Blade | 1.200 | 1.300 | 2.0 | $\pm$ 0.3 | Light green |
| 20 | 18G Blade | 1.200 | 1.300 | 2.2 | $\pm$ 0.3 | Light green |
| 21 | 18G Blade | 1.200 | 1.300 | 2.4 | $\pm$ 0.3 | Light green |
Table 1. Device models
{5}------------------------------------------------
## 6. Indications for use/Intended use
The safety lancet is intended for capillary blood sampling.
## 7. Comparison of technological characters between proposed and predicate devices
| Characters | Proposed device<br>(K223208-Safety Lancet) | Predicate device<br>(K220370-Safety Lancet) | Remark |
|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
| Product code | FMK | FMK | Same |
| Regulation No. | 21 CFR 878.4850 | 21 CFR 878.4850 | Same |
| Classification | Class II | Class II | Same |
| Indications for use | The safety lancet is intended<br>for capillary blood sampling. | The safety lancet is intended<br>for capillary blood sampling. | Same |
| Intended<br>population | Adults and pediatrics. If user<br>is under the age of 18, the<br>safety lancet must be used by<br>an adult or under the<br>supervision of an adult. | Adults and pediatrics. | Same |
| Type of use | over-the-counter | over-the-counter | Same |
| Configuration and<br>materials | Needle core: PE<br>Needle: SUS304<br>Outer case, End case, Tigger:<br>ABS<br>Plug: TPE<br>Spring: SWC | Needle core: PE, PP, Calcium<br>powder<br>Needle: stainless steel,<br>silicone oil<br>Housing, Button, Bottom,<br>Protective cap, Small lid,<br>Depth adjuster ring: ABS,PS | Similar<br>#1 |
| Needle Gauge | Normal: 30G, 28G, 26G, 23G,<br>21G, 18G<br>Blade: 21G, 18G | Normal: 30G, 28G, 26G,<br>23G, 21G | Similar<br>#2 |
| Sterilization and<br>SAL | Sterilized by gamma<br>radiation<br>SAL = $10^{-6}$ | Sterilized by gamma<br>radiation<br>SAL = $10^{-6}$ | Same |
| Single-use | Single use on one patient, no<br>more than one use | Single use on one patient,<br>no more than one use | Same |
| Sharp injury<br>protection<br>function | The puncture function can<br>be only used after the cap<br>was pulled off | The puncture function can<br>be only used after the cap<br>was twisted off | Similar<br>#3 |
| | | | |
| Safety feature | Lancet retracts into body of device after activation.<br>The force to activate the safety feature: round 8.8N<br>Test access to the sharp: the needle shall not touch the sphere. | Lancet retracts into body of device after activation.<br>The force to activate the safety feature: 4-15N<br>Test access to the sharp: the needle shall not touch the sphere. | Same |
| Exposed needle<br>length/penetration<br>depth (max) | 1.2~2.4 mm<br>30G: 1.2, 1.6, 1.8 mm<br>28G: 1.8 mm<br>26G: 1.8 mm<br>23G: 1.8, 2.2, 2.4 mm<br>21G: 1.8, 2.0, 2.2, 2.4 mm<br>21G(Blade): 2.0, 2.2, 2.4 mm<br>18G: 2.0, 2.2, 2.4 mm<br>18G(Blade): 2.0, 2.2, 2.4 mm | 1.0~3.0 mm<br>30G: 1.0, 1.6 mm<br>28G: 1.8 mm<br>26G: 1.8 mm<br>23G: 1.8 mm<br>21G: 2.2, 2.8, 3.0mm | Similar<br>#4 |
| Cap removal | Pull off<br>Force: 3~9N | Twist off<br>Force: Not revealed | Different<br>#5 |
| Shelf-life | 5 years | 5 years | Same |
| Biocompatibility | No cytotoxicity<br>No irritation<br>No skin sensitization<br>No acute systemic toxicity<br>No pyrogens | No cytotoxicity<br>No irritation<br>No skin sensitization<br>No acute systemic toxicity<br>No thermogenic reaction | Same |
Table 2. Characters comparison
{6}------------------------------------------------
## Similar #1
The safety lancet typically comprises three components, housing, needle, and spring. The component of the housing is mainly plastic. The component of the needle is stainless steel, and the spring consists of steel. Although the proposed and predicate devices use different materials, the types of components are unchanged. Besides, the performance testing reports, and biocompatibility testing reports show all the testing items meet requirements. This difference on materials has a minimal impact on the performance of the products.
In conclusion, the proposed device and predicate device are substantially equivalent.
#### Similar #2
The proposed device has six types of gauges, more than the predicate device, like 30G normal needle and 21G blade needle. Meanwhile, the proposed device has a new type-blade beveled needle tip. The differences between the blade and regular beveled tip are the beveled angle
{7}------------------------------------------------
and beveled face number; the blade beveled tip has a smaller bevel angle than the regular one, but more beveled faces. The needle length of the proposed device is included in the length range of the predicate device. The performance testing (e.g., needle removal force, puncture force testing) results demonstrated that the proposed device can be used safely and effectively.
In conclusion, the proposed device and predicate device are substantially equivalent.
#### Similar #3
The different methods to remove the protective cap will not affect sharps injury protection. The related report has verified the sharps injury protection function of the device. The needle tip is molded in plastic housing to ensure sterility. The different ways of activating the safety lancet do not influence the performance.
In conclusion, the proposed device and predicate device are substantially equivalent.
#### Similar #4
The exposed needle length/depth falls within the range of the Predicate device. The performance testing report verifies the proposed device's sharps injury protection function.
In conclusion, the proposed device and predicate device are substantially equivalent.
## Different #5
The cap removal type is different. Unlike the predicate device twisting off the cap, the proposed device pulls off the cap. The cap removal force testing demonstrates the proposed device meets the internal requirements 3°9N; these requirements are similar to other cleared lancets.
In conclusion, the proposed device and predicate device are substantially equivalent.
## 8. Non-clinical testing results
## (1) Physical performance testing
The proposed device's physical performance was tested to evaluate the overall nonclinical performance. Results demonstrated the device's safety and effectiveness by the following main items.
- । Cap removal force testing.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Cap removal force testing was conducted in compliance with the manufacturer's internal requirements 3~9 N to ensure that end users could easily remove the cap without getting hurt.
- -Needle removal force/Firmness
Needle removal force testing was conducted in compliance with the requirements of ISO 7864:2016 to ensure the needle's firmness by bonding with the hub.
- -Drop testing.
Drop testing was conducted in compliance with the requirements of IEC 60068-2-32:1993, that the needle tip would not be exposed when it was dropped from a table with a fixed height.
- -Puncture force testing.
Puncture force testing was conducted in compliance with the requirements of ISO 7864:2016. The force was as low as possible to ensure the needle easily punctured the patients' skin.
- -Safety Feature testing.
The safety features were verified in compliance with the requirements of ISO 23908:2011 and Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Medical Devices with Sharps Injury Prevention Features Document Issued on: August 9,2005, to ensure end users' safe use.
Other physical performance testing was conducted in compliance with the following standards.
- (a) ISO 9626:2016 Stainless Steel Needle Tubing for the Manufacture of Medical Device.
- (b) ISO 7864:2016 Sterile hypodermic needles for single use requirements and test methods
## (2) Sterility and Shelf-life
- (a) ISO 11737-1:2018, Sterilization of health care products Microbiological methods Part 1: Determination of a population of microorganisms on products.
- (b) ISO 11737-2:2019, Sterilization of health care products Microbiological methods Part 2: Tests of sterility performed in the definition, validation and maintenance of a sterilization process.
- (c) ISO 11137-1:2006, Radiation of medical devices part 1: Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of the sterilization process of medical devices.
- (d) ISO 11137-2:2013, Radiation sterilization of medical devices part 2: Determination of sterilization dose.
- (e) ISO11137-3: 2017, Radiation sterilization of medical devices part 3: Dosage guidelines.
- (f) ISO 11607-1:2019, Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices Part 1: Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and packaging systems
- (g) ASTM F1980: Standard for Accelerated Aging of Sterile Barrier Systems and Medical Devices
- (h) ASTM D4169-16, Standard Practice For Performance Testing Of Shipping Containers And
{9}------------------------------------------------
Systems
- (i) USP <71> Sterility Test
#### (3) Biocompatibility testing
- (a) ISO10993-1:2018, Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process.
- (b) ISO 10993-5:2009, Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity.
- (c) ISO 10993-10:2010, Biological evaluation on medical device Part 10: Test for irritation and Skin Sensitization.
- (d) ISO 10993-11:2017, Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 11: Tests for systemic toxicity.
- (e) USP <85> Bacterial Endotoxins Test
- (f) USP <788>Particulate matter in injection
- (g) USP <161>Medical Devices-Bacterial endotoxin and pyrogen tests
## (4) Simulated clinical use testing
A simulated clinical use study was conducted on 500 device samples in compliance with the Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Medical Devices with Sharps Injury Prevention Features Document Issued on: August 9, 2005. Results demonstrated the device's effectiveness and safety in a simulated clinical condition.
## 9. Clinical testing
No clinical testing is available for this device.
#### 10. Conclusion
The differences between the predicate and the proposed device do not raise any new or different questions of safety or effectiveness. The proposed device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device with respect to indications for use and technological characteristics.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.