K222969 · Rosesta Medical BV · HDR · Jun 23, 2023 · Obstetrics/Gynecology
Device Facts
Record ID
K222969
Device Name
FERTI-LILY Conception Cup
Applicant
Rosesta Medical BV
Product Code
HDR · Obstetrics/Gynecology
Decision Date
Jun 23, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 884.5250
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K222969 · Jun 23, 2023
FERTI-LILY Conception Cup
Rosesta Medical BV
At-home user performance data (actual real-world use)
The sponsor conducted usability studies, including an at-home study (FCC-002), to evaluate the safety and usability of the device in a real-world environment, confirming that users could correctly insert, wear, and reprocess the device.
Usability; At-home use; Real-world use; Safety
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
FCC-002; Usability and safety study (in-clinic simulated use and at-home actual use)
The FERTI.LILY Conception Cup is indicated for over-the-counter home use. It is for couples who have been unable to conceive naturally and who have received a diagnosis of low sperm immobility or unfavorable vaginal environment. After intercourse, the FERTI.LILY Conception Cup is placed around the cervix. It retains semen near the cervical os (the passage between the vaginal cavity and the uterus) as an aid to conception. The FERTI.LILY Conception Cup should be used during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle. The FERTI.LILY Conception Cup should not be left in place for longer than one hour.
Device Story
FERTI.LILY Conception Cup is a silicone, cup-like device used by couples at home to aid conception. Following intercourse, user inserts device into vagina and deploys cup over cervix using integrated cord; device retains semen near cervical os for up to one hour. Device includes stem for removal. Intended for use during ovulatory phase. Device is reusable for up to three months, requiring reprocessing between uses. Healthcare provider involvement is limited to initial diagnosis of fertility issues; device is designed for patient self-use. Benefits include physical positioning of semen to facilitate contact with cervical mucosa, potentially overcoming unfavorable vaginal environments or low sperm motility.
Clinical Evidence
Four clinical studies supported OTC home use. Studies evaluated self-selection, label comprehension, and usability. In labeling studies (n=75, n=41), target comprehension of 80% was met. In usability studies (n=15 each), 87-100% of subjects successfully inserted and used the device. No device-related adverse events or deficiencies were observed in the final study. Endpoints included correct insertion, positioning, removal, and reprocessing. Results demonstrate the target population can safely and effectively use the device.
Technological Characteristics
Silicone cervical cup; non-sterile. Dimensions: OD 1.27 in, depth 0.85 in, total length 4.33 in. Volume: 13.8 mL. Reusable (3-month use-life). Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1, -5, -10, -11. Shelf-life: 36 months. No electronic components or software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for couples unable to conceive naturally due to low sperm count, low sperm motility, or unfavorable vaginal environment. For OTC home use during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A cervical cap is a flexible cuplike receptacle that fits over the cervix to collect menstrual flow or to aid artificial insemination. This generic type of device is not for contraceptive use.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA acronym along with the full name of the agency on the right. The FDA part of the logo is in blue, with the acronym in a bold, sans-serif font and the full name in a smaller, sans-serif font below it. The overall design is clean and professional, reflecting the agency's role in regulating food and drugs in the United States.
June 23, 2023
Rosesta Medical BV % Jill Matzat CEO CRA Solutions, Inc. 6250 Coral Ridge Drive, Suite 100 Coral Springs, FL 33076
K222969 Re:
> Trade/Device Name: FERTI.LILY Conception Cup Regulation Number: 21 CFR§ 884.5250 Regulation Name: Cervical Cap Regulatory Class: II Product Code: HDR Dated: May 19, 2023 Received: May 22, 2023
Dear Jill Matzat:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies.
{1}------------------------------------------------
You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatoryinformation/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Michael T. Bailey -S
For Monica D. Garcia, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT3B: Division of Reproductive, Gynecology and Urology Devices OHT3: Office of GastroRenal, ObGyn, General Hospital and Urology Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K222969
Device Name FERTI.LILY Conception Cup
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The FERTI.LLY Conception Cup is indicated for over-the-counter home use. It is for couples who have been unable to conceive naturally and who have received a diagnosis of low sperm immobility or unfavorable vaginal environment. After intercourse, the FERTI.LILY Conception Cup is placed around the cervix. It retains semen near the cervical os (the passage between the vaginal cavity and the uterus) as an aid to conception. The FERTI.LIL Y Conception Cup should be used during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle. The FERTI.LILY Conception Cup should not be left in place for longer than one hour.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"> <input type="checkbox"/> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> | <span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"> <input checked="" type="checkbox"/> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary K222969 FERTI.LILY Conception Cup
#### 1. Submitter Information
| Applicant: | Rosesta Medical BV |
|------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Address: | Mr. Treublaan 7, 1097DP<br>Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
| Contact: | Robert Stal |
| Phone: | +31622377804 |
| Email: | robert@rosesta.com |
#### 2. Submission Correspondent
| Company: | CRA Solutions, Inc |
|----------|--------------------------|
| Contact: | Jill Matzat |
| Phone: | (954) 778-0146 |
| Email: | jmatzat@cra-training.com |
#### 3. Date prepared: June 22, 2023
#### 4. Device Information
| Device Name: | FERTI.LILY Conception Cup |
|--------------------|---------------------------|
| Common Name: | Cervical Cap |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 884.5250 |
| Regulation Name: | Cervical Cap |
| Product Code: | HDR (Cap, Cervical) |
| Regulatory Class: | Class II |
#### 5. Predicate Device Information
| Device Name: | Oves Cervical Cap |
|----------------|-------------------|
| 510(k) Number: | K993953 |
| Sponsor: | Veos Ltd. |
The predicate device has not been subject to a design-related recall.
#### 6. Device Description
The FERTI.LILY Conception Cup is a non-sterile, silicone, over-the-counter (OTC) device for use by couples as an aid to conception that have been unable to get pregnant naturally due to low sperm count, low sperm motility, or an unfavorable vaginal environment. After intercourse, the device is placed in the vagina, the cup-like receptable is deployed using an integrated deployment cord, and the device is positioned over the cervix to physically situate semen near the cervical os. The FERTI.LIL Y Conception Cup can be left in the vagina for a maximum duration of one hour.
{4}------------------------------------------------
The FERTI.LILY Conception Cup includes a stem to assist with removal from the vagina.
#### 7. Indications for Use Statement
The FERTI.LILY Conception Cup is indicated for over-the-counter home use. It is for couples who have been unable to conceive naturally and who have received a diagnosis of low sperm immobility or unfavorable vaginal environment. After intercourse, the FERTI.LILY Conception Cup is placed around the cervix. It retains semen near the cervical os (the passage between the vaginal cavity and the uterus) as an aid to conception. The FERTI.LILY Conception Cup should be used during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle. The FERTI.LILY Conception Cup should not be left in place for longer than one hour.
#### 8. Comparison of Intended Use and Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device
The table below includes a comparison of the intended use and technological characteristics of the subject and predicate devices.
| | K222969 | K993953 | Comparison |
|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Device Name | FERTI.LILY | Oves Cervical | -- |
| | | Cap | |
| Device Classification | II | II | Same |
| Product Code | HDR | HDR | Same |
| Indications for Use | The FERTI.LILY<br>Conception Cup is<br>indicated for over-the-<br>counter home use. It is<br>for couples who have<br>been unable to<br>conceive naturally and<br>who have received a<br>diagnosis of low<br>sperm count, sperm<br>immobility or<br>unfavorable vaginal<br>environment. After<br>intercourse, the<br>FERTI.LILY<br>Conception Cup is<br>placed around the<br>cervix. It retains<br>semen near the<br>cervical os (the<br>passage between the<br>vaginal cavity and the<br>uterus) as an aid to<br>conception. The<br>FERTI.LILY | The oves cervical<br>cap is indicated<br>for use in artificial<br>insemination<br>procedures in<br>situations in<br>which low sperm<br>count, sperm<br>immotility, or<br>hostile vaginal<br>environment have<br>been diagnosed.<br>The oves cervical<br>cap removes<br>semen from the<br>vaginal<br>environment and<br>concentrates the<br>sperm at the<br>opening of the<br>cervical os, thus<br>facilitating sperm<br>contact with<br>cervical mucosa. | The subject and<br>predicate device<br>indications are not<br>identical. Differences<br>include the subject<br>device is for OTC home<br>use while the predicate<br>is for prescription use<br>in a clinical setting.<br>Also, the subject device<br>is used after<br>intercourse, while the<br>predicate is loaded<br>before vaginal<br>placement. The<br>differences between the<br>indications for use for<br>the two devices do not<br>represent a new<br>intended use as both<br>devices are intended to<br>maintain a pool of<br>semen/sperm near the<br>cervical os as an aid to<br>conception. |
| | Conception Cup<br>should be used during<br>the ovulatory phase of<br>the menstrual cycle.<br>The FERTI.LILY<br>Conception Cup<br>should not be left in<br>place for longer than<br>one hour. | | |
| Sterile | No (non-sterile) | Not known | Different: Information<br>regarding predicate<br>device sterility is not<br>known. However,<br>differences in sterility<br>for these vaginal-use<br>devices do not raise<br>different questions of<br>safety and effectiveness<br>(S&E) |
| Device components | Cervical Cup, storage<br>bag | Cervical Cap | Similar |
| Use environment | OTC, home<br>environment | RX, clinical<br>environment | Different: The<br>difference in use<br>environment of the<br>subject and predicate<br>devices do not raise<br>different questions of<br>S&E. |
| Patient Population | Couples with low<br>sperm motility, low<br>sperm count, or<br>unfavorable vaginal<br>environment | Couples with low<br>sperm motility,<br>low sperm count,<br>or unfavorable<br>vaginal<br>environment | Same |
| Patient Contact<br>Material | Silicone | Silicone | Same |
| Cap loading | Placed in vagina after<br>intercourse | Semen added to<br>cap before<br>placement | Different: The subject<br>device is placed after<br>intercourse, while the<br>predicate is loaded with<br>sperm before delivery.<br>These differences do<br>not raise different<br>questions of S&E (e.g.,<br>device design maintains<br>sperm near the cervical |
| Human Sperm Survival Assay (HSSA) Conducted | | | |
| | Yes, ≥ 80% motility after 2-hour exposure to the Conception Cup | Not known | Different – Testing assessing the compatibility of the predicate device with sperm is not known. This difference between the subject and predicate device does not raise different questions of S&E. |
| Wear time | | | |
| | < 1 hours | Not known | Different: Information regarding predicate device wear time is not known. The difference in wear-time between the subject and predicate device does not raise different questions of S&E. |
| Shelf-life | | | |
| | Shelf Life: 36 months | Not known | Different – The predicate device shelf-life is not known. Differences in shelf-life duration do not raise different questions of S&E. |
| Reprocessing and Reuse | | | |
| | Use Life: 3 months<br>Device is reprocessed between uses. | Single-use only | Different – The predicate device is for single use only, while the subject device can be reprocessed and re-used. These differences do not raise different questions of S&E |
| Dimensions | | | |
| | Cap Dimensions:<br>OD: 1.27 ± 0.05 in<br>Cap Depth: 0.85 ± 0.035 in<br>Total length (with retrieval): 4.33 ± 0.05 in | Not known | Different – The predicate device dimensions are not known. Differences in dimensions do not raise different questions of S&E. |
| Volume | | | |
| | 13.8 ± 0.3 mL | Not known | Different – The volume of the predicate device is not known. Differences in volume do not raise different questions of S&E. |
{5}------------------------------------------------
{6}------------------------------------------------
The subject and predicate devices do not have identical indications for use or technological characteristics. As noted above, the differences in indications for use do not represent a new intended use. In addition, the
{7}------------------------------------------------
technological differences identified in size, wear-time, delivery method (i.e., after intercourse vs. loading before delivery), re-use vs. single use, sperm testing methods, etc. do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness as compared to the predicate device.
### 9. Summary of Non-Clinical Performance Testing
#### Biocompatibility:
Biocompatibility studies, including Acute Systemic Toxicity, Vaginal Irritation Testing, Cytotoxicity and Sensitization testing were performed in accordance with the 2020 FDA guidance document Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" and ISO 10993-1:2009 as follows:
- · Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5:2009/R 2014)
- Sensitization (ISO 10993-10:2010/R 2014)
- · Vaginal Irritation (ISO 10993-10:2010/R 2014)
- · Acute Systemic Toxicity (ISO 10993-11:2017)
The results of testing demonstrate that the subject device is non-irritating, non-sensitizing, and not acutely, systemically toxic.
#### Shelf Life:
A real-time shelf-life study was performed to verify that the FERTI.LILY Conception Cup maintained its specifications over its entire 36-month shelf-life. Specifications assessed in support of device shelf-life include the following:
- Device Color
- Device appearance ●
- Device odor
- Dimensional specifications ●
- Volume ●
- Tensile testing (force at break and elongation)
- Hardness (Shore A) ●
- Human Sperm Survival Assay (HSSA)
#### Reprocessing:
Reprocessing validation was conducted per the 2015 FDA guidance document, Reprocessing Medical Devices in Health Care Settings: Validation Methods and Labeling Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. This validation was conducted with residual protein and residual total organic carbon (TOC) analysis on a robust sample of devices to ensure protein and carbon residuals did not remain on the FERTI.LILY Conception Cup after full reprocessing.
### Use-Life:
The FERTI LILY Conception Cup has a use-life of three months. Testing below was conducted on newly manufactured devices and devices after maximum simulated deployment and reprocessing steps in accordance with the Instructions for Use. Devices were within specification range for each assessed parameter shown below:
- Device Color ●
- Device appearance .
{8}------------------------------------------------
- Device odor ●
- Dimensional specifications
- Volume
- Tensile testing (force at break and elongation)
- . Hardness (Shore A)
- Human Sperm Survival Assay (HSSA) ●
#### 10. Summary of Clinical Performance Testing
Data from four clinical studies was used to support the following assessments: Self-Selection, Label Comprehension, and Actual Use Usability testing for the FERTI.LILY Conception Cup to support OTC at home use of the device.
First Study: A self-selection, label comprehension, and virtual simulated use study for the FERTI-LIL Y Conception Cup was conducted to demonstrate that the target intended use population achieved acceptable comprehension of the device labeling. Seventy-five naïve subjects were enrolled and 74 subjects completed the full study protocol. The prespecified target comprehension level of 80% for each knowledge endpoint related to self-selection. label comprehension and simulated-use was met, but there were some limitations in the designation of critical tasks related to device reprocessing and re-use.
Second Study: A second labeling comprehension study was conducted to support labeling revisions in a diverse study population. Forty-one (41) naïve subjects completed the full study protocol. The target comprehension level (80%) of each knowledge endpoint tested was met.
Third Study (FCC-001): This study was conducted to evaluate the usability and label comprehension of the FERTI.LILY Conception Cup. Fifteen (15) subjects were enrolled and each demonstrated clear understanding of the package directions. The at-home usability component demonstrated that 87% of subjects were able to successfully insert the device. Transient non-serious adverse events (discomfort, irritation, cramping) were reported but did not require any treatment. A user experience survey within the study showed that subjects reported high ease of use and satisfaction with the device.
Fourth Study (FCC-002): This study was conducted to evaluate the usability and safety of the FERTI.LILY Conception Cup. Fifteen (15) subjects were enrolled and all 15 subjects were able to successfully use the device in both in-clinic (simulated use) and at-home (actual real-world use) settings. All (100%) subjects correctly inserted the device, and no device-related adverse events or device deficiencies were observed.
Furthermore, the clinical usability studies assessed the following endpoints:
- Correctly follow all instructions prior to placement in the vagina (reprocessing, wash hands ● before touching device, etc.)
- . Correctly insert the device into the vagina after sexual intercourse
- Correctly deploy and position the device over the cervical os (assessed by physician) ●
- Correctly avoid sexual activity while the device is in place and wear the device for the maximum amount of time (one hour)
- Assess leakage of semen from the vagina during the one-hour wear duration.
- Correctly remove the device from the vagina
- Health care provider (HCP) or physician assessment and documentation of the volume of semen remaining in the cup after the user removes it.
- HCP assessment for potential vaginal injury/trauma following user removal of the device,
{9}------------------------------------------------
capturing information on events occurring during use (discomfort, dislocation, device breakage/damage, etc.).
- . Correctly reprocess the device after the actual use period
This study found that all 15 subjects were able to successfully use the device in both in-clinic and athome settings, with all above outcomes met, demonstrating simulated use and real world use respectively.
In conclusion, the clinical studies demonstrated that the intended use population across different health literacy levels was able to comprehend the FERTI.LILY Conception Cup labeling and the intended use of the device. The study population also reported demographic information representative of the US population and successfully completed all elements of the studies.
#### 11. Conclusion
The results of the non-clinical and clinical performance testing described above demonstrate that the FERTI.LILY Conception Cup is as safe and effective as the predicate device and supports a determination of substantial equivalence.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.