Retrospective clinical image data of ablation procedures
Retrospective analysis of clinical image data was used to supplement software validation by evaluating the accuracy of the device in assessing ablation outcomes and the accuracy of automatic segmentations.
Patients who underwent percutaneous thermal ablation procedures
Not applicable for this study
Accuracy of assessing lesion percutaneous thermal ablation outcomes; accuracy of automatically performed segmentations
AI Performance
Output
Algorithm
Acceptance
Observed
Dev DS
Dev Readers
Test DS
Test Readers
Liver ablation zone segmentation
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Abdominal organ segmentation
—
—
—
—
—
Retrospective testing using image data of ablation procedures.
>1 (radiologists)
Indications for Use
Ablation-fit is a medical imaging application available for use with liver ablation procedures. Ablation-fit is used to assist physicians in planning, permitting the graphical display of anatomy involved in the procedure, ablation targets and ablation needle placement. Ablation-fit is used to assist physicians in confirming ablation zones during follow-up. The software is not intended for diagnosis. The software is not intended to predict ablation volumes or predict ablation success.
Device Story
Ablation-fit is a standalone medical imaging software for liver ablation planning and follow-up. It takes contrast-enhanced CT images as input. The software performs image segmentation (liver, spleen, bones, vessels, targets), 3D reconstruction, and automatic registration of pre- and post-treatment scans. Physicians use the interface to visualize anatomy in 2D/3D, simulate virtual needle placement, and define ablation targets. Post-procedure, the software registers pre- and post-treatment images to allow physicians to verify if ablation zones cover the target lesion and safety margins. Used in hospitals/clinics by physicians. Output assists in surgical planning and treatment outcome assessment; it does not provide automated diagnosis or predict ablation success.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Validation included software unit and integration testing per IEC 62304. Segmentation and registration algorithms were validated against expert-annotated ground truth. Semi-automatic functionalities were tested by three radiologists. Measurement accuracy was evaluated on CT images. Retrospective analysis of clinical image data was performed to evaluate the accuracy of ablation outcome assessment and automated segmentations. User acceptance testing conducted per IEC 62366-1.
Indicated for physicians planning and confirming liver ablation procedures in patients with soft tissue lesions.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
R.A.W. Srl % Chiara Ferrari Q&R Officer Via Soperga 13 Milan, 20127 ITALY
September 12, 2023
Re: K222938
Trade/Device Name: Ablation-fit Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050 Regulation Name: Medical image management and processing system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: QTZ Dated: August 10, 2023 Received: August 10, 2023
Dear Chiara Ferrari:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for
{1}------------------------------------------------
devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Jessica Lamb
Jessica Lamb, PhD Assistant Director Imaging Software Team DHT8B: Division of Radiological Imaging Devices and Electronic Products OHT8: Office of Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K222938
Device Name Ablation-fit
Indications for Use (Describe)
Ablation-fit is a medical imaging application available for use with liver ablation procedures.
Ablation-fit is used to assist physicians in planning, permitting the graphical display of anatomy involved in the procedure, ablation targets and ablation needle placement.
Ablation-fit is used to assist physicians in confirming ablation zones during follow-up.
The software is not intended for diagnosis. The software is not intended to predict ablation volumes or predict ablation success.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
#### I. Submitter
Manufacturer: R.A.W. S.r.1. Address: Via Soperga 13, 20127 Milan, Italy Phone: +39 3400747597
Contact Person: Chiara Ferrari Applicant Correspondent: Chiara Ferrari Email: quality@endo-sight.it Date Prepared: August 10th, 2023
#### II. Device
| 510(k) Number | K222938 |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| Device Name | Ablation-fit |
| Trade or Proprietary<br>Name: | Ablation-fit |
| Common or Usual Name: | Ablation-fit |
| Classification Name: | Medical image management and processing system |
| Primary Product Code: | QTZ |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 892.2050 |
| Regulatory Class | II |
#### III. Predicate Device
Substantial equivalence is claimed to the following device:
Primary predicate device:
- Aline Ablation Intelligence Class II 21 CFR 892.2050, Radiology, LLZ, which has ● been the subject of a cleared 510(k) with the FDA log number K202297.
| 510(k) Number | K202297 |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name | Aline Ablation Intelligence |
| Manufacturer | Mirada Medical Ltd |
| Device Name | Aline Ablation Intelligence |
| Regulation Number | 892.2050 |
| Regulation Name | Picture archiving and communications system |
| Regulatory Class | II |
| Primary Product Code | LLZ |
Reference device:
The following reference device, which shares similar planning functions with Ablation-fit, is used in this submission to support the claim regarding the level of concern associated with Ablation-fit.
- Visible Patient Suite- Class II 21 CFR 892.2050, Radiology, LLZ, which has ● been the subject of a cleared 510(k) with the FDA log number K212896.
{4}------------------------------------------------
| 510(k) Number | K212896 |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name | Visible Patient Suite |
| Manufacturer | Visible Patient, SAS |
| Device Name | Visible Patient Suite |
| Regulation Number | 892.2050 |
| Regulation Name | Medical image management and processing system |
| Regulatory Class | II |
| Primary Product Code | LLZ |
#### IV. Device Description
Ablation-fit is a stand-alone medical imaging software that integrates Reconstruction, Segmentation, Registration and Visualization algorithms into a user interface to support physicians during liver ablation treatments planning and follow-up.
Ablation-fit allows to perform the entire workflow from DICOM (Digital Imaging and COmmunications in Medicine) images to 3D reconstruction of volume of interests, ablation probe placement and treatment outcome verification.
Specifically, Ablation-fit main functionalities include:
- Image loading from different supports (including PACS),
- DICOM images handling and visualization in axial, sagittal, coronal views,
- image segmentation,
- tools for manual edit of segmentations.
- 3D visualization,
- virtualization of ablation probe placement,
- pre- and post-treatment images registration. ●
The software permits segmentation and 3D reconstruction of volumes of interest. The software contours all of this anatomic information not only in axial, sagittal, and coronal planes for 2D visualization, but also three-dimensionally. Every computed segmentation can be manually modified in the 2D axial visualization and consequently the three-dimensional mapping of the scan changes accordingly.
Ablation-fit let the user simulate the virtual needle insertion and shows the desired ellipsoid of ablation.
Once the ablation procedure has been performed, pre- and post-treatment scans are registered. Consequently, the software can verify whether the ablation zones entirely surrounds the lesion and the safety margin.
#### V. Indications for Use
Ablation-fit is a medical imaging application available for use with liver ablation procedures.
Ablation-fit is used to assist physicians in planning, permitting the graphical display of anatomy involved in the procedure, ablation targets and ablation needle placement.
Ablation-fit is used to assist physicians in confirming ablation zones during follow-up.
The software is not intended for diagnosis. The software is not intended to predict ablation volumes or predict ablation success.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Characteristic | Ablation-fit | Aline Ablation<br>Intelligence | Equivalence | |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Manufacturer | R.A.W. s.r.l. | Mirada Medical Ltd | N/A | |
| 510(k) number | K222938 | K202297 | N/A | |
| Classification | Class II. 892.2050 QTZ | Class II. 892.2050 LLZ | N/A | |
| Clinical<br>equivalence | Target<br>Population | The intended patient<br>population of the<br>Ablation-fit software is the<br>patient demographic<br>chosen by physicians to<br>undergo liver ablation<br>treatment (including<br>patient with soft tissue<br>lesions). | The intended patient<br>population of the Aline<br>Ablation Intelligence<br>software is the patient<br>demographic chosen by<br>physicians to undergo<br>ablation treatment<br>(including<br>patient with soft tissue<br>lesions). | Ablation-fit<br>target population<br>is limited to liver<br>ablation<br>treatment. |
| | Where used | The software is intended<br>to be used:<br>• In operating rooms<br>• In office environments<br>within hospitals | The application's use<br>environment is the<br>Operating Room and the<br>hospital healthcare<br>environment such<br>as interventional radiology<br>control room. | Equivalent |
| | Site in the body | Liver | Not specified | Ablation-fit is<br>intended to be<br>used only on<br>liver |
| Intended Users | Physicians | Physicians | Equivalent | |
| Technical<br>equivalence | Design | stand-alone desktop<br>software application with<br>tools and features<br>designed to assist users in<br>planning ablation<br>procedures as well as tools<br>for evaluating ablation<br>procedure's outcome | stand-alone desktop<br>software application with<br>tools and features<br>designed to assist users in<br>planning ablation<br>procedures as well as tools<br>for evaluating ablation<br>procedure's outcome | Equivalent |
| | Energy Used<br>and/or<br>Delivered | None - software only<br>application. The software<br>application does not<br>deliver or depend on<br>energy delivered to<br>or from patients | None - software only<br>application. The software<br>application does not<br>deliver or depend on<br>energy delivered to<br>or from patients | Equivalent |
| | Supported<br>modalities | Contrast-enhanced CT | CT, MR | Ablation-fit does<br>not support MR<br>modalities |
| | Data<br>visualization | • 2D visualization tools:<br>Window and level, pan,<br>zoom, cross-hairs, slice<br>navigation.<br>• 3D visualization of all<br>segmented abdomen<br>structures | • 2D visualization tools:<br>Window and level, pan,<br>zoom, cross-hairs, slice<br>navigation.<br>• 3D visualization of<br>segmented<br>targets/ablation zones. | Ablation-fit can<br>visualize 3D<br>spatial rendering<br>of all segmented<br>structures. These<br>additional<br>anatomical<br>segmentations<br>have the goal to<br>highlight the<br>presence of the<br>anatomy to the<br>user when |
| | | planning intervention | | |
| | Data segmentation | • Automatic segmentation for liver, spleen, bones, liver vessels, skin<br>• Tools for interactive segmentation for liver, spleen and liver targets/ablation zone<br>• Tools for manual segmentation editing and/or correction | • No automatic segmentation of organs<br>• Tools for interactive segmentation of targets/ablation zone<br>• Tools for manual segmentation editing and/or correction | Ablation-fit provides an automatic segmentation of abdomen organs |
| | Planning function | Overlaying and positioning virtual ablation needles and user-selected estimates of the ablation regions onto the medical images | Overlaying and positioning virtual ablation needles and user-selected estimates of the ablation regions onto the medical images | Equivalent |
| | Data registration | • Automatic image registration of pre- and post-treatment images<br>• Blending tools to assess the correctness of the registration | • Automatic image registration of pre- and post-treatment images<br>• Manual registration correction | Ablation-fit has not a manual registration correction, but it provides a tool for the assessment of the correctness of the registration |
| | Ablation confirmation function | Ablation-fit can perform registration of pre-treatment, containing the identified targets and post-treatment scans containing ablation zone. The segmented and registered volumes between the two scans (targets, ablation zones) are then showed together on the same scan and in 3D. In addition, different colors enhance the residual target volume and safety margins. | Aline Ablation Intelligence can perform a registration of the planning scan, containing the identified target tissue, with the confirmation scan showing the ablation zone. The delineated target tissue on the planning scan is then projected onto the confirmation scan and overlaid onto the delineated ablation zone segmentation. This to help the user in analyzing if the ablation zone covers the target tissue with the desired amount of margin. | Equivalent |
#### VI. Comparison of Technological Characteristics
{6}------------------------------------------------
Ablation-fit is substantially equivalent to its predicate device with respect to:
- Image acquisition of CT images
- Image segmentation of targets and ablation zones ●
- . Segmentation interactive tools and possible manual corrections
- 3D visualization of targets and ablation zones ●
- Virtual ablation needles and user-selected estimates of the ablation regions onto the medical . images
- Automatic image registration of pre- and post-treatment images .
{7}------------------------------------------------
- Overlay of targets and ablation zones in 3D and 2D visualization
The main differences between Ablation-fit and its predicate device concern the following aspects:
- Ablation-fit is intended to be used only for liver ablation procedures ●
- Ablation-fit is not intended to be used with MR images. This is clearly stated on labeling and ● indication for use.
- . Ablation-fit performs image segmentation of abdominal structures, enabling computation of 3D volumes and providing accurate 3D representations of segmented structures and their spatial relationships. This allows the highlighting of anatomical structures to the user when planning interventions. In the predicate device, only targets and ablation zones are 3D segmented. Nevertheless, all segmentation processes underwent extensive validation, demonstrating their compliance with acceptance criteria. Moreover, the reference device we have included in this submission (Visible Patient Suite - K212896) presents similar functions for organ segmentation (including liver, bones, vessels) and is used for planning purposes, as specified in its intended use.
- Ablation-fit does not provide manual registration correction. Instead, Ablation-fit permits to assess the correctness of the image registration providing the blending tool.
The subject software has the similar intended use and technological/functional features as its predicate device in providing tools and workflow designs to support physicians during liver ablation treatments planning and follow-up. The slight differences between the subject and predicate device (supported modalities, data visualization and data segmentation, data registration) do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness as demonstrated by verification activities. Based on the comparison of technological characteristics and performance data provided within this submission, the data supports the substantial equivalence of Ablation-fit to the identified predicate device.
#### VII. Performance Data
Ablation-fit was designed and developed according to the software life-cycle process described in ANSI AAMI IEC 62304:2006/A1:2016.
First, a design and development project plan was defined, together with software requirements. They were transformed into software design specifications and software architecture. Specific tests are then planned and performed to verify both software units and software integration of the requirements. Software verification and validation testing were conducted, and documentation was provided as recommended by FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices.".
Bench tests that compare the output of all segmentation and registration processes with ground truth annotated by qualified experts show that the algorithms performed as expected. Additionally, all semi-automatic functionalities underwent testing by three radiologists to account for variability resulting from user interaction. Quantitative testing related to these topics has been performed according to "Technical Performance Assessment of Quantitative Imaging in Radiological Device Premarket Submissions Guidance".
Also, a user acceptance test was performed according to ANSI AAMI IEC 62366-1:2015+AMD1:2020. This user acceptance test performs both verification and validation of Ablationfit.
Measurement Accuracy Test was also performed in order to evaluate the accuracy of measurements carried out with Ablation-fit software on CT images.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Additionally, to supplement the software validation for Ablation-fit, we conducted software testing using retrospective image data of ablation procedures. The purpose of such analysis was to retrospectively evaluate the accuracy of Ablation-fit in assessing the outcome of lesion percutaneous thermal ablations and the accuracy of the automatically performed segmentations.
Performance, functional, and algorithmic testing outcomes show that Ablation-fit satisfies the device's user demands and requirements, which are deemed to be substantially equivalent to those of the predicate device.
## VIII. Conclusion
In conclusion, Ablation-fit functions at least as safely and effectively as the designated predicate device and is essentially equivalent to it, according to performance tests and device evaluations contained in this 510(k) submission. Ablation-fit meets requirements for safety and effectiveness and does not introduce any new potential safety risks.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.