Immunoassay for the in vitro quantitative determination of antibodies to thyroglobulin in human serum and plasma. The anti-Tg autoantibodies determination is used as an aid in the detection of autoimmune thyroid diseases in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay “ECLIA” is intended for use on cobas e 411 immunoassay analyzer.
Device Story
Elecsys Anti-Tg is an in vitro diagnostic immunoassay for quantitative detection of anti-thyroglobulin antibodies in human serum/plasma. It utilizes a competitive electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA) principle: patient sample, biotinylated human thyroglobulin antigen, and ruthenium-labeled monoclonal anti-Tg antibodies are incubated with streptavidin-coated microparticles. The analyzer measures light emission generated by the ruthenium complex, which is inversely proportional to the concentration of anti-Tg antibodies in the sample. Used in clinical laboratories on cobas e 411 analyzers; operated by trained laboratory personnel. Results are calculated via a 2-point calibration curve. The assay aids clinicians in diagnosing autoimmune thyroid diseases by identifying elevated anti-Tg levels, supporting clinical decision-making alongside other laboratory and clinical findings.
Clinical Evidence
No new clinical studies were performed. Substantial equivalence is supported by analytical performance data, including precision (within-lab and lot-to-lot), linearity (15–4000 IU/mL), and interference testing (endogenous and exogenous). Method comparison with the predicate (N=129) showed a slope of 0.974 and R=0.930. Matrix equivalency was established for serum, K2-EDTA, and K3-EDTA plasma. Clinical sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off values rely on data from the predicate device (K053426).
Technological Characteristics
Quantitative ECLIA; utilizes streptavidin-coated microparticles, biotinylated Tg, and ruthenium-labeled monoclonal anti-Tg antibodies. Energy source: electrical (voltage applied to electrode for chemiluminescence). Form factor: reagent rackpack (M, R1, R2) for use on cobas e 411 analyzer. Measuring range: 15–4000 IU/mL. Standardized against NIBSC 65/93. Biotin-neutralizing antibody added to reagents to mitigate interference.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring quantitative determination of anti-thyroglobulin (anti-Tg) antibodies to aid in the detection of autoimmune thyroid diseases. No specific age or gender restrictions provided.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A thyroid autoantibody immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the thyroid autoantibodies (antibodies produced against the body's own tissues). Measurement of thyroid autoantibodies may aid in the diagnosis of certain thyroid disorders, such as Hashimoto's disease (chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis), nontoxic goiter (enlargement of thyroid gland), Grave's disease (enlargement of the thyroid gland with protrusion of the eyeballs), and cancer of the thyroid.
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K222610
B Applicant
Roche Diagnostics
C Proprietary and Established Names
Elecsys Anti-Tg
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JZO | Class II | 21 CFR 866.5870 - Thyroid Autoantibody Immunological Test System | IM - Immunology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
Modification of a previously cleared assay to decrease interference to biotin.
B Measurand:
Anti-Thyroglobulin (anti-Tg) autoantibody
C Type of Test:
Quantitative, electrochemiluminescent immunoassay
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
K222610 - Page 2 of 10
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
B Indication(s) for Use:
Immunoassay for the in vitro quantitative determination of antibodies to thyroglobulin in human serum and plasma. The anti-Tg autoantibodies determination is used as an aid in the detection of autoimmune thyroid diseases in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay “ECLIA” is intended for use on cobas e 411 immunoassay analyzer.
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
For in vitro diagnostic use.
D Special Instrument Requirements:
cobas e 411 immunoassay analyzer
IV Device/System Characteristics:
A Device Description:
The Elecsys reagent rackpack (M, R1, R2) consists of:
M: Streptavidin-coated microparticles (transparent cap), 1 bottle, 12 mL: Streptavidin-coated microparticles 0.72 mg/mL; preservative.
R1: Tg~biotin (gray cap), 1 bottle, 10 mL: Biotinylated Tg (human) 0.200 mg/L; TRIS buffer 100 mmol/L, pH 7.0; preservative.
R2: Anti Tg-Ab~Ru(bpy) (black cap), 1 bottle, 10 mL: Monoclonal anti-Tg antibodies (human) labeled with ruthenium complex 0.620 mg/L; TRIS buffer 100 mmol/L, pH 7.0; preservative.
The Elecsys Anti-Tg has been modified from the previously cleared format (K053426) to decrease potential biotin interference in the assay. Briefly, free biotin in serum and plasma is neutralized by the addition of a biotin-neutralizing antibody in reagents. The antibodies are specific for free biotin and do not bind to, or interact with, the biotin-linker conjugates.
B Principle of Operation:
The Elecsys Anti-Tg assay is a two-step sandwich immunoassay that makes use of a competitive test principle and uses biotinylated Tg and a monoclonal Anti-Tg specific antibody labeled with ruthenium complex.
{2}
The Elecsys Anti-Tg assay has an assay time of 18 minutes. During the first incubation, 10 μL of sample is combined with a biotinylated-Tg and antibodies from the patient sample bind the Tg antigen. During the second incubation, after the addition of anti-Tg antibodies labeled with ruthenium complex and streptavidin-coated microparticles, the immunocomplex produced becomes bound to the solid phase via interaction of biotin and streptavidin. The reaction mixture is aspirated into the measuring cell where the microparticles are magnetically captured onto the surface of the electrode. Unbound substances are then removed with ProCell. The application of voltage to the electrode then induces chemiluminescent emission which is measured by a photomultiplier. The results are determined via a calibration curve which is instrument-specifically generated by a 2-point calibration and a master curve provided via the reagent barcode or 2-barcode.
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
Roche Elecsys Anti-Tg
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K053426
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K222610 (Device) | K053426 (Predicate) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Elecsys Anti-Tg | Elecsys Anti-Tg |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | Immunoassay for the in vitro quantitative determination of antibodies to thyroglobulin in human serum and plasma. The anti-Tg autoantibodies determination is used as an aid in the detection of autoimmune thyroid diseases in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay “ECLIA” is intended for use on cobas e 411 immunoassay analyzer. | Immunoassay for the in vitro quantitative determination of antibodies to thyroglobulin in human serum and plasma. The anti-Tg determination is used as an aid in the detection of autoimmune thyroid diseases.
The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay “ECLIA” is intended for use on Elecsys and cobas e immunoassay analyzers. |
| Detection method | Electrochemiluminescence “ECLIA” | Same |
K222610 - Page 3 of 10
{3}
| Test format | Quantitative competitive | Same |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Assay Reaction Time | 18 Minutes | Same |
| Traceability | Standardized against the NIBSC (National Institute for Biological Standards and Control) 65/93 Standard | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Sample Matrices | Human serum and plasma (K2-EDTA, K3-EDTA) | Human serum and plasma (sodium heparin, K2/K3-EDTA) |
| Calibrators | Anti-Tg CalSet (sold separately) | Anti-Tg calibrator 1 and 2 (included in test kit) |
| Controls | PreciControl ThyroAB (sold separately) | PreciControl Anti-Tg 1 and 2 (included in test kit) |
| Biotin Tolerance | No interference up to 1200 ng/mL | No interference up to 60 ng/mL |
| Measuring Range | 15 – 4000 IU/mL | 10 – 4000 IU/mL |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
The following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines were used:
- CLSI EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Third Edition
- CLSI EP06-Ed2, Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures – Second Edition
- CLSI EP07-Ed3, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry.
- CLSI EP09c 3rd Edition, Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples
- CLSI EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Second Edition
- CLSI EP37-Ed1, Supplemental Tables for Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Within-laboratory precision of the modified Elecsys Anti-Tg was conducted following the CLSI EP05-A3. Aliquots of six human serum samples including one native sample and five
K222610 - Page 4 of 10
{4}
native sample pools, and two PreciControl ThyroAB controls were measured in duplicate per run, two runs per day, for 21 days using one reagent lot on one cobas e 411 analyzer, resulting a total of 84 measurements per sample. The within-laboratory precision is shown in the table below:
| Sample | N | Mean (IU/mL) | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Within-Lab Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| 1 | 84 | 15.7 | 1.3 | 8.4 | 1.0 | 6.4 | 1.6 | 10.0 | 2.3 | 14.5 |
| 2 | 84 | 110.0 | 7.8 | 7.1 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 8.3 | 7.6 |
| 3 | 84 | 1953.0 | 64.0 | 3.3 | 31.7 | 1.6 | 29.9 | 1.5 | 77.4 | 4.0 |
| 4 | 84 | 2495.0 | 106.0 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 67.5 | 2.7 | 125.0 | 5.0 |
| 5 | 84 | 3816.0 | 171.0 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 171.0 | 4.5 |
| Control 1 | 84 | 79.4 | 5.4 | 6.8 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 6.7 | 8.4 |
| Control 2 | 84 | 177.0 | 14.0 | 7.9 | 9.7 | 5.5 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 17.2 | 9.7 |
Lot-to-lot precision was evaluated on one cobas e 411 analyzer by testing five serum samples, including one native donor sample and four native donor pools, and two PreciControl ThyroAB controls, in five replicates per run, one run per day for five days using three reagent lots, yielding 25 measurements per lot for each sample. The results are summarized in the table below.
| Sample | N | Mean (IU/mL) | Repeatability | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| 1 | 75 | 17.9 | 1.9 | 10.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 11.3 |
| 2 | 75 | 112.0 | 6.0 | 5.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.2 | 5.6 | 8.7 | 7.8 |
| 3 | 75 | 1868.0 | 76.4 | 4.1 | 21.2 | 1.1 | 78.0 | 4.2 | 111.0 | 6.0 |
| 4 | 75 | 3708.0 | 238.0 | 6.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 297.0 | 8.0 | 381.0 | 10.3 |
| 5 | 75 | 3903.0 | 131.0 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 346.0 | 8.9 | 370.0 | 9.5 |
| Control 1 | 75 | 86.4 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 0.0* | 0.0 | 4.7 | 5.4 |
| Control 2 | 75 | 212.0 | 9.8 | 4.6 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 4.9 | 2.3 | 11.6 | 5.5 |
* Negative variance estimates were set to 0.
2. Linearity:
Linearity of the Elecsys anti-Tg assay was assessed according to CLSI EP06-Ed2. Native human serum samples and normal serum sample pools were used to create six dilution series for a total of 26 concentration levels across the measuring range. The samples were assayed in triplicate within a single run on the cobas e 411 analyzer. For each level, the mean of the measured values, predicted value and the deviation from linearity were calculated. Predicted values were calculated using a best fitted straight line by a weighted least squares linear regression analysis. Percent deviations from linearity were calculated as differences between the observed values (mean values) and the predicted values divided by the predicted values. The results of the study were summarized in the following table:
K222610 - Page 5 of 10
{5}
| Range (IU/mL) | Slope (95% CI) | Y-Intercept (95% CI) | R2 | Deviation from Linearity (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 14.18 – 4071 | 1.052 (1.024 – 1.081) | -2.181 (-4.673 – 0.311) | 0.996 | -15.05% – 11.28%* |
* One mid-range sample gave a higher deviation from linearity of -15.05% and one sample on the low end of the range gave a deviation from linearity of 11.28% which corresponded to a deviation of 1.4 IU/mL. The deviation from linearity for the remaining samples were between -7.6% to 10.7%.
The results support the linearity of the claimed measuring interval (AMI): 15 – 4000 IU/mL.
## 3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
### Endogenous Interference:
Potential interference from some endogenous substances was assessed using three native serum pools with anti-Tg concentrations of low (~25 IU/mL), mid (~120 IU/mL), and high-range (~3000 IU/mL). For difference substance interferent levels, each of the three samples was further divided into two aliquots for a control sample (with no added interferent) and test sample (with added interferent). The anti-Tg level in the test and control samples were assayed in five replicates using one modified Elecsys anti-Tg reagent lot using one instrument. For each interferent concentration level, the recovery was based on the mean of the replicates of test sample value comparing to the control sample.
The results are summarized in the following table.
| Endogenous Interferent | Highest concentration tested without interference | Concentration of interference claimed in labeling |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Biotin | 2400 ng/mL | 1200 ng/mL |
| Bilirubin | 66 mg/dL | 66 mg/dL |
| Hemoglobin | 420 mg/dL | 420 mg/dL |
| Intralipid | 2000 mg/dL | 2000 mg/dL |
| Rheumatoid Factor | 300 IU/mL | 300 IU/mL |
| Tg | 200 ng/mL | 100 ng/mL |
### Exogenous Interference:
Interference from 17 common and 14 pharmaceutical drugs that might be used in the clinical context of the assay’s intended use were assessed using two serum samples, one with a low concentration of anti-Tg (~25 IU/mL) and one with a high concentration of anti-Tg (1500 IU/mL). The two samples were divided into aliquots and spiked with the potential interferents or with solvent only. No significant interference (a recovery of 100% ± 10%) is observed for the interferents at the concentrations tested in the table below.
K222610 - Page 6 of 10
{6}
| Common and Pharmaceutical Drugs | Concentration Tested (mg/L) | Common and Pharmaceutical Drugs | Concentration Tested (mg/L) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 156 | Levodopa | 7.5 |
| Acetylcysteine | 150 | Levothyroxine | 0.25 |
| Acetylsalicylic Acid | 30 | Liothyronine | 0.045 |
| Amiodarone | 40.0 | Methimazole | 16.0 |
| Ampicillin-Na | 75 | Methyldopa | 22.5 |
| Ascorbic acid | 52.5 | Metronidazole | 123 |
| Carbimazole | 30.0 | Nivolumab | 96.0 |
| Cyclosporine | 1.8 | Octreotide | 0.300 |
| Cefoxitin | 750 | Perchlorate | 2000 |
| Doxycycline | 18 | Phenylbutazone | 321 |
| Flucortolone | 100 | Prednisolone | 100 |
| Heparin | 3300 IU/L | Propranolol | 48.0 |
| Hydrocortisone | 200 | Propylthiouracil | 180 |
| Ibuprofen | 219 | Rifampin | 48 |
| Iodine | 50.0 | Theophylline | 60 |
| Itraconazole | 10 | | |
## Cross reactivity:
Potential cross-reactivity between anti-Tg and anti-TPO was assessed in a cross-reactivity study. Two native human serum pools with anti-Tg concentrations of 26 IU/mL and 96 IU/mL were spiked with anti-TPO antibodies to a level of 1500 IU/mL and assessed using one reagent lot of the modified Elecsys Anti-Tg and a cobas e 411 immunoassay analyzer. The average results from three replicates of the paired spiked human serum pools were compared with the un-spiked human serum pool to determine the percent of cross reactivity. Significant Cross Reactivity was defined as ≥10% Cross Reactivity between spiked and un-spiked native human serum pools. The results demonstrate that there is no notable cross reactivity between anti-Tg and anti-TPO (up to 1500 IU/ml) in the Elecsys Anti-Tg assay.
## 4. Assay Reportable Range:
The reportable range for the Elecsys Anti-Tg assay is 15 – 4000 IU/mL.
## 5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
### Traceability:
The Elecsys Anti-Tg assay is standardized against the NIBSC (National Institute for Biological Standards and Control) 65/93 Standard.
### Stability:
An on-board stability study of the modified assay reagents was performed using five samples, including two native single serum samples and three native serum pools, across the
K222610 - Page 7 of 10
{7}
measuring range and tested with one lot of the modified Elecsys Anti-Tg stored on the analyzer. The data support the package insert claim of 6 weeks on-board stability.
A stability study to determine the stability of opened reagents when stored at 2–8°C was performed using five samples, including two native single serum samples and three native serum pools, across the measuring range and tested at various time points with one lot of the modified Elecsys Anti-Tg stored at 2–8°C for up to 50 days. The data support the package insert claim of 6 weeks.
A real time stability study was performed to examine the long term stability of shelf-life of the modified Elecsys Anti-Tg reagents when stored at 2–8°C. At various testing points, two lots of PreciControl ThyroAB Level 1 and Level 2 controls were tested in triplicate on one cobas e 411 using three lots of the modified Elecsys Anti-Tg reagents stored at 2–8°C. The data support the package insert claim that the Elecsys Anti-Tg reagents are stable when stored at 2–8°C for up to 15 months.
## 6. Detection Limit:
The limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and limit of quantitation (LoQ) were determined in accordance with CLSI EP17-A2.
### Limit of Blank (LoB):
For determination of the LoB, the LoB was determined as the 95th percentile of blank sample measurements. Briefly, an analyte-free native human serum sample was measured using three reagent lots of the modified Elecsys Anti-Tg, one cobas e 411 analyzer, over the course of six runs with 10-replicates per run, resulting in a total of 60 blank replicates per reagent lot. The LoB determined in all three lots were less than the claimed LoB in the labeling, 9.0 IU/mL.
### Limit of Detection (LoD):
For the determination of the LoD, five low-level native human serum samples, including three single native donors and two native sample pools, were measured in duplicate in six runs, over six days, with three lots of the modified Elecsys Anti-Tg on one cobas e 411 analyzer. In total, 60 measured values of samples with low analyte concentrations were obtained per lot. The LoD corresponds to the concentration determined by LoD = LoB + 1.653 x SD total (of low analyte samples). The LoD determined in all three lots were less than the claimed LoD in the labeling, 10.0 IU/mL.
### Limit of Quantitation (LoQ):
For the determination of LoQ, four low-level single native human serum samples were measured in quintuplicate per run, one run per day for five days using three different lots of the modified Elecsys Anti-Tg on one cobas e 411 analyzer, resulting in 25 replicates per sample per lot. The LoQ was set as the lowest concentration of analyte that can be reproducibly measured with a total error of ≤ 20% at ≤ 15 IU/mL. The LoQ determined in all three lots were less than the claimed LoQ in the labeling, 15 IU/mL.
K222610 - Page 8 of 10
{8}
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Refer to K053426.
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
A method comparison study was performed to show comparability between the performance of the current Elecsys anti-Tg assay (predicate) and the modified Elecsys anti-Tg assay (candidate). A total of 129 native human samples, including 90 native single donor samples and 39 native serum pools, spanning the predicate measuring range (23.1 – 3609 IU/mL) were tested on one cobas e 411 analyzer. The results of Passing-Bablok regression analysis are shown below:
| N | Range (IU/mL) | Slope (95% CI) | Y-Intercept (95% CI) | R | Bias at 115 U/mL (95% CI) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 129 | 23.1 – 3609 | 0.974 (0.942 – 1.018) | 1.72 (-4.35 – 8.21) | 0.930 | -1.14 (-4.0 – 2.9) |
2. Matrix Comparison:
A matrix equivalency study to serum was conducted to support use of the Elecsys anti-Tg assay on the cobas e 411 analyzer with the following sample matrices: Serum, dipotassium (K2) EDTA plasma, and tripotassium (K3) EDTA plasma. In the study, at least 44 serum/plasma donor matched venous specimens were collected and evaluated. Each specimen was tested in singlicate using one reagent lot of the modified Elecsys Anti-Tg. The results were analyzed by Passing-Bablok regression with serum results as the reference (x-axis). The results are summarized as follows:
| | N | Serum Sample Range (IU/mL) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | Pearson r Value |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| K2-EDTA Plasma vs Serum | 44 | 17.0 – 3678 | 1.018 (1.004 – 1.035) | -1.17 (-7.24 – 1.10) | 0.997 |
| K3-EDTA Plasma vs Serum | 44 | 17.0 – 3678 | 1.021 (0.998 – 1.041) | -1.37 (-8.09 – 0.944) | 0.996 |
C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Refer to K053426.
2. Clinical Specificity:
Refer to K053426.
K222610 - Page 9 of 10
{9}
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Refer to K053426.
## D Clinical Cut-Off:
Refer to K053426.
## E Expected Values/Reference Range:
The reference range of the modified Elecsys Anti-Tg was verified by the same as the reference range of the predicate which was established based on a total of 391 healthy subjects and confirmed the threshold value of 115 IU/mL (which corresponds to the 94th percentile).
The labeling of the Elecsys Anti-Tg includes the following statement: "Each laboratory should investigate the transferability of the expected values to its own patient population and if necessary determine its own reference ranges."
## VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
## IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K222610 - Page 10 of 10
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.