Allmed Medical (Hubei) Protective Products Co., Ltd.
Product Code
FYA · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Sep 29, 2022
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4040
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The proposed surgical gowns are intended to be worn by operating room personnel during surgical procedure to protect both the surgical patient and the operating room personnel from transfer of microorganisms, body fluids, and particulate material. Per ANSI/AAMI PB70:2012 Liquid barrier performance and classification of protective apparel and drapes intended for use in health care facilities, the surgical gowns met the requirements for Level 3 classification. Non-sterile gowns are to be sold to re-packager/re-labeler establishments for ethylene oxide (EtO) sterilization according to ISO 11135-1 prior to marketing to the end users and sterile surgical gowns are to be sold directly to the end users after EtO sterilization validation to ISO 11135-1.
Device Story
Single-use, disposable, non-reinforced surgical gown; constructed of SMS (spunbond-meltblown-spunbond) nonwoven polypropylene/polyester material. Available in six sizes (S-XXXL) and blue color. Provided in sterile or non-sterile formats; non-sterile versions require ethylene oxide (EtO) sterilization by re-packagers. Worn by operating room personnel to protect patient and staff from fluid/particulate transfer. Performance verified via bench testing against AAMI Level 3 standards; provides physical barrier protection during surgery.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Performance verified via AAMI/ANSI PB70:2012, AATCC 127-2018, AATCC 42-2017, ASTM D5034-09, ASTM D5587-15, ASTM D1683-17, ASTM F1868-17, ISO 9073-10-2003, and 16 CFR 1610. Biocompatibility confirmed per ISO 10993-5, -7, and -10.
Indicated for operating room personnel during surgical procedures to provide a barrier against microorganisms, body fluids, and particulate material. Meets AAMI Level 3 liquid barrier performance requirements.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Surgical apparel are devices that are intended to be worn by operating room personnel during surgical procedures to protect both the surgical patient and the operating room personnel from transfer of microorganisms, body fluids, and particulate material. Examples include surgical caps, hoods, masks, gowns, operating room shoes and shoe covers, and isolation masks and gowns. Surgical suits and dresses, commonly known as scrub suits, are excluded.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for surgical gowns and surgical masks. A surgical N95 respirator or N95 filtering facepiece respirator is not exempt if it is intended to prevent specific diseases or infections, or it is labeled or otherwise represented as filtering surgical smoke or plumes, filtering specific amounts of viruses or bacteria, reducing the amount of and/or killing viruses, bacteria, or fungi, or affecting allergenicity, or it contains coating technologies unrelated to filtration (e.g., to reduce and or kill microorganisms). Surgical N95 respirators and N95 filtering facepiece respirators are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 878.9, and the following conditions for exemption:(i) The user contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(ii) Analysis and nonclinical testing must:
(A) Characterize flammability and be demonstrated to be appropriate for the intended environment of use; and
(B) Demonstrate the ability of the device to resist penetration by fluids, such as blood and body fluids, at a velocity consistent with the intended use of the device.
(iii) NIOSH approved under its regulation.
(2) Class I (general controls) for surgical apparel other than surgical gowns and surgical masks. The class I device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 878.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health and Human Services logo. To the right of that is a blue square with the letters FDA in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
September 29, 2022
Allmed Medical (Hubei) Protective Products Co., Ltd % Ivy Wang Technical Manager Shanghai SUNGO Management Consulting Company Limited. 14th Floor, 1500# Central Avenue Shanghai, Shanghai 200122 China
Re: K221637
Trade/Device Name: Surgical Gown (Sterile); Surgical Gown (Non-sterile) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4040 Regulation Name: Surgical Apparel Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FYA Dated: September 2, 2022 Received: September 2, 2022
Dear Ivy Wang:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Bifeng Qian, M.D., Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT4B: Division of Infection Control and Plastic Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K221637
#### Device Name
Surgical Gown (Sterile); Surgical Gown (Non-sterile)
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The proposed surgical gowns are intended to be worn by operating room personnel during surgical procedure to protect both the surgical patient and the operating room personnel from transfer of microorganisms, body fluids, and particulate material. Per ANSI/AAMI PB70:2012 Liquid barrier performance and classification of protective apparel and drapes intended for use in health care facilities, the surgical gowns met the requirements for Level 3 classification.
Non-sterile gowns are to be sold to re-packager/re-labeler establishments for ethylene oxide (EtO) sterilization according to ISO 11135-1 prior to marketing to the end users and sterile surgical gowns are to be sold directly to the end users after EtO sterilization validation to ISO 11135-1.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
X Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
# *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Allmed Medical (Hubei) Protective Products Co., Ltd No.29 Dong Hu Road, Majiadian Town, Zhijiang City, Hubei, China
#### 510(K) Summary
# K221637
(As requirement by 21 CFR 807.92)
Date prepared: 29th, September, 2022
#### A. Applicant:
Name: Allmed Medical (Hubei) Protective Products Co., Ltd Address: No.29 Dong Hu Road, Majiadian Town, Zhijiang City, Hubei, China Contact Person: Vince Tian Title: General Manager of Quality Tel: 86 717 4215906 Fax: 86 717 4215989 Email: vince@allmed.cn
Submission Correspondent: Primary contact: Ms. Ivy Wang Shanghai SUNGO Management Consulting Co., Ltd. Room 1401, Dongfang Building, 1500# Century Ave., Shanghai 200122, China Tel: +86-21-58817802 Email: haiyu.wang@sungoglobal.com Secondary contact: Mr. Raymond Luo Room 1401, Dongfang Building, 1500# Century Ave., Shanghai 200122, China Tel: +86-21-68828050 Email: fda.sungo@@gmail.com
#### B. Device:
Trade Name: Surgical Gown (Sterile); Surgical Gown (Non-sterile) Common Name: Surgical Gown Model: S, M, L, XL, XXL and XXXL
Regulatory Information Classification Name: Gown, Surgical Classification: Class II Product code: FYA Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4040 Review Panel: General Hospital
#### C. Predicate device:
K202706 B.J.ZH.F.PANTHER MEDICAL EQUIPMENT CO., LTD. Trade Name: Surgical Gown (Sterile); Surgical Gown (Non-sterile)
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Allmed Medical (Hubei) Protective Products Co., Ltd No.29 Dong Hu Road, Majiadian Town, Zhijiang City, Hubei, China
Common Name: Surgical Gown
Regulatory Information Classification Name: Gown, Surgical Classification: II Product code: FYA Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4040 Review Panel: General Hospital
#### D. Indications for use of the device:
The surgical gowns are intended to be worn by operating room personnel during surgical procedure to protect both the surgical patient and the operating room personnel from transfer of microorganisms,body fluids, and particulate material. Per ANSI/AAMI PB70:2012 Liquid barrier performance and classification of protective apparel and drapes intended for use in health care facilities, the surgical gowns met the requirements for Level 3 classification.
Non-sterile gowns are to be sold to re-packager/re-labeler establishments for ethylene oxide (EiO) sterilization according to ISO 11135-1 prior to marketing to the end users and sterile surgical gowns are to be sold directly to the end users after EtO sterilization validation to ISO 11135-1.
#### E. Device Description:
The proposed surgical gowns are intended to be worn by operating room personnel during surgical procedures to protect both the surgical patient and the operating room personnel from transfer of microorganisms, body fluids, and particulate material. The proposed devices are single use, disposable medical devices and can be provided in sterile two types. Both the sterile and non-sterile surgical gowns are blue colored and available in six sizes, including S, M. L, XL, XXL and XXXL. For non-sterile surgical gowns, they shall be sterilized by EO prior to use.
The proposed surgical gowns are constructed of a SMS nonwoven material (spunbond +meltblown + spunbond nonwovens) and has been tested according to ANSI/AAMI PB70:2012 Liquid Barrier Performance and Classification of Protective Apparel and Drapes Intended for Use in Health Care Facilities and meets AAMI Level 3. It is a kind of non-reinforced surgical gown.
#### F. Comparison Tables of Proposed and Predicate Devices
| Item | Proposed Device | Predicate Device | Result |
|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| 510K # | K221637 | K202706 | - |
| Manufacturer | Allmed Medical (Hubei) Protective<br>Products Co., Ltd | B.J.ZH.F.PANTHER MEDICAL<br>EQUIPMENT CO., LTD. | - |
| Product Name | Surgical Gown (Sterile); Surgical Gown<br>(Non-sterile) | Surgical Gown (Sterile); Surgical<br>Gown (Non-sterile) | Same |
| Level | Level 3 | Level 3 | Same |
#### Table 1 General Comparison of Proposed and Predicate Devices
{5}------------------------------------------------
Allmed Medical (Hubei) Protective Products Co., Ltd No.29 Dong Hu Road, Majiadian Town, Zhijiang City, Hubei, China
| Product Code | FYA | FYA | Same |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 878.4040 | 21 CFR 878.4040 | Same |
| Indications for use | The surgical gowns are intended to be<br>worn by operating room personnel<br>during surgical procedure to protect both<br>the surgical patient and the operating<br>room personnel from transfer of<br>microorganisms, body fluids, and<br>particulate material. Per ANSI/AAMI<br>PB70:2012 Liquid barrier performance<br>and classification of protective apparel<br>and drapes intended for use in health<br>care facilities, the surgical gowns met the<br>requirements for Level 3 classification.<br><br>Non-sterile gowns are to be sold to<br>re-packager/re-labeler establishments for<br>ethylene oxide (EtO) sterilization<br>according to ISO 11135-1 prior to<br>marketing to the end users and sterile<br>surgical gowns are to be sold directly to<br>the end users after EtO sterilization<br>validation to ISO 11135-1. | Surgical gowns are intended to be<br>worn by operating room personnel<br>during surgical procedure to protect<br>both the surgical patient and the<br>operating room personnel from<br>transfer of microorganisms, body<br>fluids, and particulate material. Per<br>ANSI/AAMI PB70:2012 Liquid<br>barrier performance and classification<br>of protective apparel and drapes<br>intended for use in health care<br>facilities, the surgical gowns met the<br>requirements for Level 3<br>classification. | Same |
| Style | Non-reinforced | Non-reinforced | Same |
| Durability | Disposable | Disposable | Same |
| Color | Blue | Blue | Same |
| Labeling | Conform with 21 CFR Part 801 | Conform with 21 CFR Part 801 | Same |
#### Table 2 Performance Comparison of Proposed and Predicate Devices
| Item | Proposed Device | Predicate Device K202706 | Result |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|---------|
| Weight per square (g) | $41\pm3g/m^2$ | $55g/m^2$ | Similar |
| Size | S, M, L, XL, XXL, XXXL | S, M, L, XL, XXL, XXXL | Same |
| Flammability | Class I | Class I | Same |
| Hydrostatic pressure | $\ge50$ cm | $\ge50$ cm | Same |
| Water impact | $\le1.0g$ | $\le1.0g$ | Same |
| Breaking strength | MD Mean 138.64N<br>CD Mean 75.10N | >20N | Similar |
| Tearing strength | MD Mean 34.39N<br>CD Mean 18.06N | >20N | Similar |
| Seam strength | Mean 57.56 N | Not available on Predicate Device's<br>510K Summary | Similar |
{6}------------------------------------------------
Allmed Medical (Hubei) Protective Products Co., Ltd No.29 Dong Hu Road, Majiadian Town, Zhijiang City, Hubei, China
| Evaporative<br>Resistance | $0.00315kPa \cdot m^2/W$ | Not available on Predicate Device's<br>510K Summary | Similar |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|---------|
| Linting | $Log_{10}$ Mean 2.7 | $Log_{10}$ <4 | Similar |
| Material | SMS polypropylene<br>Nonwoven+Polyester | SMS polypropylene<br>Nonwoven+polyester | Same |
| Biocompatibility | | | |
| Cytotoxicity | No cytotxicity | No cytotxicity | Same |
| Irritation | No Irritation | No Irritation | Same |
| Sensitization | No sensitization | No sensitization | Same |
| Sterile | Sterile/Non-sterile | Sterile/Non-sterile | Same |
| Sterilization method | EO sterilization | EO sterilization | Same |
| Ethylene Oxide<br>Residuals | EO residual<4mg/piece<br>ECH residual<9mg/piece | Not available on Predicate Device's<br>510K Summary | Similar |
# Analysis:
The subject surgical gowns are substantially equivalent to the predicate device, in terms of general intended use, performance testing, material composition. The tearing strength, breaking strength and linting are slightly different from those of the predicate device. The proposed device has been tested according to ASTM D5587-15, ASTM D5034-09 (2017) and ISO 9073-10-2003 respectively, and met the requirements of the standard.
Under the conditions of each study, the subject surgical gowns (sterile and non-sterile) are non-cytotoxic, non-sensitizing and negligibly irritating per ISO-10993 and have met the requirements of ANSI/AAMI PB70:2012 Liquid Barrier Performance and Classification of Protective Apparel and Drapes Intended for Use in Health Care Facilities for AAMI Level 3 surgical gowns.
Evaporative Resistance: Although the data of evaporative resistance of the predicate device is not publicity available, the proposed device has been tested for the performance according to ASTM F1868-17 and the result as shown is far below the limit, i.e. 1.0 kPa · m2/W, as required by the standard, which can prove the safety and effectiveness of the proposed surgical gown.
Sterilization: Both the proposed and the predicate devices have same sterilization for sterile products, i.e. EO sterilization. Although the concrete date of EO/ECH residual of the predicate device is not publicity available, EO/ECH residual of the proposed device have been tested according to ISO 10993-7 and meet the residual requirements of the standard. No safety or effectiveness concern will be raised.
# G. Summary of Non-Clinical Testing
Non-clinical tests were conducted to verify that the proposed device met all design specification. The test results demonstrated that the proposed device complies with the following standards and ANSI/AAMI PB70:2012 Liquid Barrier Performance and Classification of Protective Apparel and Drapes Intended for Use in Health Care Facilities.
- A ISO 10993-5:2009 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity
- A ISO 10993-7:2008 Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 7: Ethylene oxide sterilization residuals
{7}------------------------------------------------
# Allmed Medical (Hubei) Protective Products Co., Ltd
# No.29 Dong Hu Road, Majiadian Town, Zhijiang City, Hubei, China
- A ISO 10993-10:2010 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 10: Tests for Irritation And Skin Sensitization
- > AAMI/ANSI PB70:2012, Liquid Barrier Performance and Classification of protective Apparel and Drapes Intended For Use In Health Care Facilities
- > AATCC 127-2018, Water Resistance: Hydrostatic Pressure Test
- > AATCC 42-2017, Water Penetration Resistance: Impact Penetration Test
- A ASTM D5034-09 (2017), Standard Test Method for Breaking Strength and Elongation of Textile Fabrics (Grab Test)
- > ASTM D5587-15 (2019), Standard Test Method for Tearing Strength of Fabrics by Trapezoid Procedure;
- > ASTM D1683/D1683M-17(2018) Standard Test Method for Failure in Seams of Woven Fabrics
- > ASTM F1868-17 Standard Test Method for Thermal and Evaporative Resistance of Clothing Materials Using a Sweating Hot Plate
- > ISO 9073-10-2003 Textiles - Test methods for nonwovens - Part 10: Lint and other particles generation in the dry state
- > 16 CFR 1610, Standard for the Flammability of Clothing Textiles
- > ASTMF88/F88M:2015 Standard Test Method for Seal Strength of Flexible Barrier Materials;
- > ASTM F1929:2015 Standard Test Method for Detecting Seal Leaks in Porous Medical Packaging by Dye Penetration;
- > ASTM F1886/F1886-16 Standard Test Method for Determining Integrity of Seals for Flexible Packaging by Visual Inspection
| Testing Methodology | Purpose | Acceptance Criteria | Result |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Performance Testing | | | |
| Hydrostatic Pressure<br>AATCC 127-2018 | To measure the resistance of<br>a fabric to the penetration of<br>water under hydrostatic<br>pressure | ≥50cm H2O | Passed<br>3 non-consecutive lots<br>tested, using a sample<br>size of 32/lot.<br>All parts of test<br>specimen met the level<br>3 requirements. |
| Water Resistance<br>AATCC 42-2017 | To verify the impact<br>penetration of the device. | ≤1.0g | Passed<br>3 non-consecutive lots<br>tested, using a sample<br>size of 32/lot.<br>All parts of test<br>specimen met the level<br>3 requirements. |
| Tearing Strength<br>ASTM D5587-15 (2019) | To determine the tearing<br>strength of the device. | ≥10N | Passed<br>Sample size of 10 pcs<br>MD Mean: 34.39N<br>CD Mean: 18.06N |
| | | | |
| Breaking Strength<br>ASTM D5034-09 (2017) | To determine the breaking<br>strength and elongation of<br>the device. | ≥30N | Passed<br>Sample size of 10 pcs<br>MD Mean: 138.64N<br>CD Mean: 75.10N |
| Seam Strength<br>ASTM<br>D1683/D1683M-17(2018) | To measure the sewn seam<br>strength in surgical gown by<br>applying a force<br>perpendicular to the sewn<br>seams | ≥30N | Passed<br>Sample size of 10 pcs<br>Mean 57.56 N |
| Evaporative Resistance<br>ASTM F1868-17 | To measure the evaporative<br>resistance under steady-state<br>conditions of fabrics of the<br>device. | ≤1.0kPa·m²/W | Passed<br>Sample size of 3pcs<br>0.00315 kPa • m²/W |
| Lint and other particles<br>generation in the dry state<br>ISO 9073-10-2003 | To measure the linting of<br>non-woven in the dry state. | Coefficient of linting<br>Log₁₀≤4.0 | Passed<br>Sample size of 10pcs<br>Log₁₀ Mean: 2.7 |
| Flammability<br>16 CFR 1610 | To determine the<br>flammability of textiles for<br>the surgical gowns. | Class I | Passed<br>Sample size of 5 pcs<br>All samples are Class I |
| Biocompatibility Testing | | | |
| Cytotoxicity | Assess the potential risk of<br>cytotoxicity of surgical<br>gown material | Non-cytotoxic | Passed<br>Under the condition of<br>this study, the device<br>has no potential<br>toxicity. |
| Irritation | Assess the potential risk of<br>irritation of surgical gown<br>material | Negligibly irritating | Passed<br>Under the condition of<br>this study, the device is<br>negligibly irritating. |
| Sensitization | Assess the potential risk of<br>sensitization of surgical<br>gown material | Non-sensitizing | Passed<br>Under the conditions<br>of the study, the device<br>is non-sensitizing |
| Ethylene Oxide Residuals | Verify low levels of sterilant<br>residuals | EO residual < 4mg/piece<br>ECH < 9mg/piece | Passed<br>The EO/ECH residuals<br>shown in test report<br>are far below the<br>criteria |
# Table 3 Summary of Performance and Biocompatibility Testing
{8}------------------------------------------------
Allmed Medical (Hubei) Protective Products Co., Ltd No.29 Dong Hu Road, Majiadian Town, Zhijiang City, Hubei, China
#### H. Clinical Test Conclusion
No clinical study is included in this submission.
#### I. Conclusion
The conclusion drawn from the nonclinical tests demonstrates that the subject device in 510(K) submission,
{9}------------------------------------------------
# Allmed Medical (Hubei) Protective Products Co., Ltd No.29 Dong Hu Road, Majiadian Town, Zhijiang City, Hubei, China
the subject surgical gown is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as or better than the legally marketed predicate device cleared under K202706.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.