The Z7 Zirconia Implant System is intended for surgical placement in the patient's upper and lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth and in order to restore the patient chewing function. The implants are indicated for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. The ø3.7 mm reduced diameter implants are recommended for central and lateral incisors only.
Device Story
Z7 Zirconia Implant System consists of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) endosseous dental implants and PEEK prosthetic components (healing caps, temporary abutments). Implants feature integrated abutments (monotype) and are manufactured via ceramic injection molding (CIM) with structured macro/micro surface topography. Used in dental clinics by clinicians for surgical placement into alveolar bone to support artificial teeth. Implants are provided sterile (Ethylene Oxide); PEEK components are non-sterile and require end-user steam sterilization. Device provides mechanical support for prosthetic restoration; immediate loading is permitted under specific stability conditions. Benefits include restoration of chewing function and tooth replacement.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only: material performance (ISO 13356:2015), fatigue testing (ISO 14801:2016), surface morphology/chemical analysis (SEM/EDS), biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1/5), endotoxin testing (USP 85/161), and sterilization validation (ISO 11135/17665).
Technological Characteristics
Material: Y-TZP (ISO 13356:2015) for implants; PEEK (ASTM F2026-17) for prosthetic components. Manufacturing: Ceramic injection molding. Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide (implants); steam (PEEK components). Form factor: One-piece monotype with integrated abutment; diameters 3.7mm and 4.3mm. Connectivity: None.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring dental implants in the upper or lower jaw to support prosthetic devices and restore chewing function. Suitable for immediate loading given good primary stability and appropriate occlusal loading. Reduced diameter (3.7mm) implants restricted to central and lateral incisors.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An endosseous dental implant is a prescription device made of a material such as titanium or titanium alloy that is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a root-form endosseous dental implant. The root-form endosseous dental implant is characterized by four geometrically distinct types: Basket, screw, solid cylinder, and hollow cylinder. The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2)
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a blade-form endosseous dental implant. The special controls for this device are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use;
(ii) Mechanical performance (fatigue) testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate maximum load (endurance limit) when the device is subjected to compressive and shear loads;
(iii) Corrosion testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate corrosion potential of each metal or alloy, couple potential for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system, and corrosion rate for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system;
(iv) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible;
(v) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device;
(vi) Performance testing to evaluate the compatibility of the device in a magnetic resonance (MR) environment;
(vii) Labeling must include a clear description of the technological features, how the device should be used in patients, detailed surgical protocol and restoration procedures, relevant precautions and warnings based on the clinical use of the device, and qualifications and training requirements for device users including technicians and clinicians;
(viii) Patient labeling must contain a description of how the device works, how the device is placed, how the patient needs to care for the implant, possible adverse events and how to report any complications; and
(ix) Documented clinical experience must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is in blue and includes the letters "FDA" followed by the words "U.S. Food & Drug Administration".
Z7 LLC % Linda Braddon Chief Executive Officer Secure BioMed Evaluations 7828 Hickory Flat Highway Suite 120 Woodstock, Georgia 30188
Re: K221488
Trade/Device Name: Z7 Zirconia Implant System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3640 Regulation Name: Endosseous Dental Implant Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DZE, NHA Dated: May 25, 2023 Received: May 25, 2023
Dear Linda Braddon:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
# Andrew I. Steen -S
Andrew I. Steen Assistant Director DHT1B: Division of Dental and ENT Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K221488
Device Name Z7 Zirconia Implant System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Z7 Zirconia Implant System is intended for surgical placement in the patient's upper and lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth and in order to restore the wing function. The implants are indicated for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.
The ø3.7 mm reduced diameter implants are recommended for central and lateral incisors only.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <div style="display:inline-block;width:20px;height:20px;border:1px solid black;">☑</div> |
|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | <div style="display:inline-block;width:20px;height:20px;border:1px solid black;">☐</div> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## K221488
| Date Prepared | June 26, 2023 |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Sponsor | Z7, LLC<br>28 Felmley Road<br>Whitehouse Station, NJ<br>908-399-1359 |
| 510(k) Contact | Secure BioMed Evaluations<br>Linda Braddon, Ph.D.<br>7828 Hickory Flat Highway<br>Suite 120<br>Woodstock, GA 30188<br>770-837-2681<br>Regulatory@SecureBME.com |
| Trade Name | Z7 Zirconia Implant System |
| Common Name | Endosseous Dental Implant |
| Code –<br>Classification | DZE, NHA<br>21 CFR 872.3640: Class II |
| Primary Predicate | K192053 TAV Medical Ltd. W Zirconia Implants |
| Reference Device | K172668 TAV Medical Ltd. W Zirconia Implants<br>K132585 Zibone Ceramic Dental Implant System |
| Device Description | The Z7 Zirconia Implant System is an integrated system of endosseous dental<br>implants (Z7 Zirconia Implant One Piece) and PEEK prosthetic parts. The Z7<br>Zirconia Implant One Piece are yttria stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP)<br>dental implants composed of a One Piece, monotype implant with an<br>integrated abutment. The implant is manufactured via a ceramic injection<br>molding with the macro and micro surface characteristics of the implant<br>directly structured in the mold. The implant body portion is configured to<br>extend into the bone and osseo-integrate with the alveolar bone. The neck<br>should be positioned 1.8mm above the bone. The implants come in<br>corresponding diameters of 3.7 and 4.3 mm. |
| Indications for Use<br>Statement | The Z7 Zirconia Implant System is intended for surgical placement in the<br>patient's upper and lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such<br>as artificial teeth and in order to restore the patient chewing function. The<br>implants are indicated for immediate loading when good primary stability is<br>achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.<br><br>The Ø3.7mm reduced diameter implants are recommended for central and<br>lateral incisors only. |
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### Comparison of Indications for Use
| Subject Device<br>Z7 Zirconia Implant System | Primary Predicate Device<br>TAV Medical's W Zirconia Implants<br>K192053 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended for surgical placement in the patient's<br>upper and lower jaw to provide support for<br>prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth and in<br>order to restore the patient chewing function.<br>The implants are indicated for immediate<br>loading when good primary stability is achieved<br>and with appropriate occlusal loading. | Intended for surgical placement in the patient's<br>upper and lower jaw to provide support for<br>prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth and in<br>order to restore the patient chewing function.<br>The implants are indicated for immediate<br>loading when good primary stability is achieved<br>and with appropriate occlusal loading |
| The $ø$ 3.7 mm reduced diameter implants are<br>recommended for central and lateral incisors<br>only. | The $ø$ 3.6 mm reduced diameter implants are<br>recommended for central and lateral incisors<br>only. |
There are no significant differences between the subject and predicate device indications for use. The minor differences in wording to align with the provided sizes of the subject device do not change the intended use for demonstration of substantial equivalence.
| Characteristic | Subject Device<br>Z7 Zirconia Implant<br>System | Primary Predicate<br>Device<br>TAV Medical's W<br>Zirconia Implants<br>K192053 | Reference Device<br>TAV Medical's W<br>Zirconia Implants<br>K172668 |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Purpose of Device | Subject Device | Same Indications | Similar One-Piece<br>Sizes as Subject<br>Device |
| Device Classification | Class II | Class II | Class II |
| Product Code | DZE, NHA | DZE, NHA | DZE, NHA |
| Material | Yttria-stabilized<br>zirconia (Y-TZP) per<br>ISO 13356:2015 | Yttria-stabilized<br>zirconia (Y-TZP) per<br>ISO 13356:2015 | Yttria-stabilized<br>zirconia (Y-TZP) per<br>ISO 13356:2015 |
| Surface Topography | Macro and Micro<br>Roughness | Macro and Micro<br>Roughness | Macro and Micro<br>Roughness |
| Description | Endosseous dental<br>implant | Endosseous dental<br>implant | Endosseous dental<br>implant |
| Design | One-Piece Ceramic<br>Implants | One-Piece Ceramic<br>Implants | One-Piece Ceramic<br>Implants |
| | N/A | Two-Piece Ceramic<br>Implants | Two-Piece Ceramic<br>Implants |
| Diameter | Z7 One-Piece:<br>3.7mm, 4.3mm | TAV W One-Piece:<br>3.6mm | TAV W One-Piece:<br>4.1mm, 4.8mm |
#### Comparison of Technological Characteristics - Implants
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Characteristic | Subject Device<br>Z7 Zirconia Implant<br>System | Primary Predicate<br>Device<br>TAV Medical's W<br>Zirconia Implants<br>K192053 | Reference Device<br>TAV Medical's W<br>Zirconia Implants<br>K172668 |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | N/A | TAV W Two-Piece:<br>4.1mm, 4.8mm | TAV W Two-Piece:<br>4.1mm, 4.8mm |
| Length | Z7 One-Piece: 10mm,<br>13mm | TAV W One-Piece:<br>8mm, 10mm, 12mm,<br>14mm | TAV W One-Piece:<br>8mm, 10mm, 12mm,<br>14mm |
| | N/A | TAV W Two Piece:<br>8mm, 10mm, 12mm,<br>14mm | TAV W Two Piece:<br>8mm, 10mm, 12mm,<br>14mm |
| Manufacturing<br>Technology | CIM: Ceramic<br>injection molding | CIM: Ceramic<br>injection molding | CIM: Ceramic<br>injection molding |
| Sterilization Method | Ethylene Oxide | Gamma irradiation | Gamma irradiation |
| Intended Use<br>Environment | Dental clinic setting | Dental clinic setting | Dental clinic setting |
| Abutments | Straight | TAV W One-Piece:<br>Straight | TAV W One-Piece:<br>Straight |
| | N/A | TAV W Two-Piece:<br>Straight and Angled | TAV W Two-Piece:<br>Straight and Angled |
| Biocompatibility | Implant device with<br>permanent (>30 days)<br>contact with tissue /<br>bone / dentin | Implant device with<br>permanent (>30 days)<br>contact with tissue /<br>bone / dentin | Implant device with<br>permanent (>30 days)<br>contact with tissue /<br>bone / dentin |
| Shelf-Life | 5 years | Not stated in 510(k)<br>Summary | 1 year |
#### Comparison of Technological Characteristics – PEEK Healing Caps
| Characteristic | Subject Device<br>MABB<br>Z7 Zirconia Implant<br>System | Primary Predicate<br>Device<br>TAV Medical's W<br>Zirconia Implants<br>K192053 | Reference Device<br>TAV Medical's W<br>Zirconia Implants<br>K172668 |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Regulation Number | 872.3640 | 872.3640 | 872.3640 |
| Classification Product<br>Code | DZE, NHA | DZE, NHA | DZE, NHA |
| Product Name | PEEK Healing Cap | PEEK Healing Cap<br>for W One Piece<br>Zirconia Implant | PEEK Healing Cap for<br>W One Piece<br>Zirconia Implant |
| Product Description | Protect the implant<br>during the healing<br>phase up to 180 days. | Protect the implant<br>during the healing<br>phase up to 180 days. | Protect the implant<br>during the healing<br>phase up to 180 days. |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Characteristic | Subject Device<br>MABB<br>Z7 Zirconia Implant<br>System | Primary Predicate<br>Device<br>TAV Medical's W<br>Zirconia Implants<br>K192053 | Reference Device<br>TAV Medical's W<br>Zirconia Implants<br>K172668 |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Material | PEEK per ASTM<br>F2026-17 | PEEK | PEEK |
| Diameter (mm) | 3.7, 4.3 | 3.6, 4.1, 4.8 | 4.1, 4.8 |
| Height (mm) | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Angle (°) | 0° (Straight) | 0° (Straight) | 0° (Straight) |
| Sterility | Non-Sterile | Non-Sterile | Non-Sterile |
#### Comparison of Technological Characteristics - PEEK Temporary Abutments
| Characteristic | Subject Device<br>MABB<br>Z7 Zirconia Implant<br>System | Primary Predicate<br>Device<br>TAV Medical's W<br>Zirconia Implants<br>K192053 | Reference Device<br>TAV Medical's W<br>Zirconia Implants<br>K172668 |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Regulation Number | 872.3640 | 872.3640 | 872.3640 |
| Classification Product<br>Code | DZE, NHA | DZE, NHA | DZE, NHA |
| Product Name | PEEK Healing Cap | PEEK Healing Cap<br>for W One Piece<br>Zirconia Implant | PEEK Healing Cap<br>for W One Piece<br>Zirconia Implant |
| Product Description | Serves as a basis for<br>temporary restoration<br>for crown. Up to 180<br>days. | Serves as a basis for<br>temporary restoration<br>for crown or bridge.<br>Up to 180 days. | Serves as a basis for<br>temporary restoration<br>for crown or bridge.<br>Up to 180 days. |
| Material | PEEK per ASTM<br>F2026-17 | PEEK | PEEK |
| Diameter (mm) | 3.7, 4.3 | 3.6, 4.1, 4.8 | 4.1, 4.8 |
| Angle (°) | 0° (Straight) | 0° (Straight) | 0° (Straight) |
| Sterility | Non-Sterile | Non-Sterile | Non-Sterile |
#### Technological Characteristics
There are no significant technological differences between the subject and predicate devices. Minor differences include the method of sterilization, and the exact size offerings. The subject device uses the same material as the additional predicates and all devices are manufactured using ceramic injection molding techniques. Any technological differences between the subject and predicate devices do not raise new concerns for safety or effectiveness.
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### Non-Clinical Performance Testing Summary
| Test | Test Method Summary | Results |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Material<br>Performance<br>Testing | Per ISO 13356:2015 Implants for surgery —<br>Ceramic materials based on yttria-stabilized<br>tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) | PASS<br>Device met all<br>predetermined<br>acceptance criteria |
| Fatigue Testing | Per ISO 14801:2016 Dentistry — Implants —<br>Dynamic loading test for endosseous dental<br>implants | PASS<br>Substantially equivalent<br>fatigue strength to<br>reference device<br>(K132585) |
| Implant Surface<br>Roughness and<br>Chemical<br>Analysis<br>Validation | Surfaces macro and micro morphological<br>characterization through 3D Scanning Electron<br>Microscope (SEM) Imaging. Surface chemical<br>analysis through Energy Dispersive<br>Spectrometry (EDS Analysis). | PASS<br>Device met all<br>predetermined<br>acceptance criteria |
Performance testing for the subject device is summarized in the table below:
Biological evaluation of the subject device was performed according to ISO 10993-1 (cytotoxicity testing per ISO 10993-5). Endotoxin testing on the subject device or suitable test specimens was performed following USP<85> and USP<161> according to the sponsor's endotoxin sampling plan.
The implants are provided sterile to the end user via Ethylene Oxide (EO) sterilization. The applicable cycle was validated in compliance with ISO 11135:2014 "Sterilization of health-care products -Ethylene oxide - Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices" to a sterility assurance level of 10° for the worst-case configuration of the subject device. All cycle parameters were within the limits established by the protocol and residue testing yielded acceptable results for EO and ECH (ethylene chlorohydrin) per ISO 10993-7:2008 "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 7: Ethylene oxide sterilization residuals". The subject device non-sterile components are end-user steam sterilized. The applicable steam sterilization cycle was validated in compliance with ISO 17665 "Sterilization of health care products -- Moist heat -- Part 1: Requirements for the development, validation, and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices" and demonstrated a sterility assurance level of 10-6
Accelerated aging has been applied on the final sterile implant packaging and is being followed by real time aging to validate a five-year shelf life.
{8}------------------------------------------------
#### Conclusions
Based on the similarities of the intended use/indications for use, technological and functional characteristic, and the results of the non-clinical performance testing, the subject device is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.