The INHANCE SHOULDER SYSTEM Reverse Total Shoulder with a humeral stem is indicated for primary, fracture or revision total reverse shoulder replacement procedures to address the following. The system is indicated for use in patients whose shoulder joint has a gross rotator cuff deficiency. The patient must be anatomically suited to receive the implants and a functional deltoid muscle is necessary. The system is also indicated from an anatomic to reverse shoulder prosthesis without the removal of a well-fixed INHANCE humeral stem. - · A severely painful, disabling, arthritic joint - · Fractures of the humeral head (with Short Humeral Stems) - · Fractures of the humeral head and proximal humerus (with Standard or Long Stems) - · Revisions of previously failed shoulder joint replacements
Device Story
The INHANCE Reverse Glenoid Peripheral Posts are modular orthopedic implants designed for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The system consists of a titanium alloy baseplate, glenosphere, and peripheral posts (4mm, 6mm, 8mm) used to increase contact area and glenoid stability. The device is implanted by orthopedic surgeons in a clinical/surgical setting. Peripheral posts are inserted through baseplate holes to address anterior, posterior, and superior glenoid defects. The system is used in conjunction with a humeral stem, central screw, and peripheral locking screws. The device provides structural support and stability for the glenoid component, facilitating joint reconstruction in patients with rotator cuff deficiency. It is intended for cementless application of glenoid components.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data was provided. Substantial equivalence was demonstrated through bench testing, including range of motion evaluation (ASTM F1378), construct fatigue testing (ASTM F1378), construct loosening and disassociation testing (ASTM F2028-17), biocompatibility assessments (ISO 10993-1), and MRI compatibility testing (ASTM F2052-15, F2213-17, F2182-19e2, F2119-07).
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Titanium alloy (implants), Cross-linked VE UHMWPE (liner). Design: Modular glenoid baseplate with peripheral posts (4, 6, 8mm). Fixation: Cementless glenoid baseplate with screw/post fixation. Sterilization: Validated per ISO 11137-1/2 (SAL 10^-6). Standards: ASTM F1378 (RoM, fatigue), ASTM F2028-17 (loosening/disassociation), ISO 10993-1 (biocompatibility), ISO 11607-1/2 (packaging).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with gross rotator cuff deficiency requiring primary, fracture, or revision reverse total shoulder replacement. Requires functional deltoid muscle and anatomically suitable joint. Addresses painful/disabling arthritis, humeral head/proximal humerus fractures, and failed prior replacements.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a shoulder joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a humeral resurfacing component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a glenoid resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II. The special controls for this device are:(1) FDA's:
(i) “Use of International Standard ISO 10993 ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part I: Evaluation and Testing,’ ”
(ii) “510(k) Sterility Review Guidance of 2/12/90 (K90-1),”
(iii) “Guidance Document for Testing Orthopedic Implants with Modified Metallic Surfaces Apposing Bone or Bone Cement,”
(iv) “Guidance Document for the Preparation of Premarket Notification (510(k)) Application for Orthopedic Devices,” and
(v) “Guidance Document for Testing Non-articulating, ‘Mechanically Locked’ Modular Implant Components,”
(2) International Organization for Standardization's (ISO):
(i) ISO 5832-3:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 3: Wrought Titanium 6-aluminum 4-vandium Alloy,”
(ii) ISO 5832-4:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 4: Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum casting alloy,”
(iii) ISO 5832-12:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 12: Wrought Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy,”
(iv) ISO 5833:1992 “Implants for Surgery—Acrylic Resin Cements,”
(v) ISO 5834-2:1998 “Implants for Surgery—Ultra-high Molecular Weight Polyethylene—Part 2: Moulded Forms,”
(vi) ISO 6018:1987 “Orthopaedic Implants—General Requirements for Marking, Packaging, and Labeling,” and
(vii) ISO 9001:1994 “Quality Systems—Model for Quality Assurance in Design/Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing,” and
(3) American Society for Testing and Materials':
(i) F 75-92 “Specification for Cast Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Material,”
(ii) F 648-98 “Specification for Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Powder and Fabricated Form for Surgical Implants,”
(iii) F 799-96 “Specification for Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy Forgings for Surgical Implants,”
(iv) F 1044-95 “Test Method for Shear Testing of Porous Metal Coatings,”
(v) F 1108-97 “Specification for Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium Alloy Castings for Surgical Implants,”
(vi) F 1147-95 “Test Method for Tension Testing of Porous Metal,”
(vii) F 1378-97 “Standard Specification for Shoulder Prosthesis,” and
(viii) F 1537-94 “Specification for Wrought Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implants.”
{0}------------------------------------------------
August 31, 2022
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logos of the Department of Health & Human Services and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, featuring a stylized human figure. The FDA logo is on the right, with the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text. The logos are placed side by side.
Depuy Ireland UC % Russ Parrott VP of Research and Development Ignite Orthopedics LLC 700 Park Avenue Suite F Winona Lake, Indiana 46590
## Re: K221467
Trade/Device Name: INHANCE™ Reverse Glenoid Peripheral Posts Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3660 Regulation Name: Shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PHX, MBF, PAO Dated: August 24, 2022 Received: August 25, 2022
## Dear Russ Parrott:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4. Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
For Victoria Lilling, M.D. Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K221467
Device Name INHANCE™ Reverse Glenoid Peripheral Posts
Indications for Use (Describe)
Reverse Total Shoulder
The INHANCE SHOULDER SYSTEM Reverse Total Shoulder with a humeral stem is indicated for primary, fracture or revision total reverse shoulder replacement procedures to address the following. The system is indicated for use in patients whose shoulder joint has a gross rotator cuff deficiency. The patient must be anatomically suited to receive the implants and a functional deltoid muscle is necessary. The system is also indicated from an anatomic to reverse shoulder prosthesis without the removal of a well-fixed INHANCE humeral stem.
- · A severely painful, disabling, arthritic joint
- · Fractures of the humeral head (with Short Humeral Stems)
- · Fractures of the humeral head and proximal humerus (with Standard or Long Stems)
- · Revisions of previously failed shoulder joint replacements
#### Fixation Methods
The humeral stem is intended for cementless use. The glenoid baseplate components are intended for cementless application with the addition of screw fixation.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"> <span style="font-size: 10pt;"> <span style="font-family: Symbol;"> <span style="color: black;">☑</span> </span> </span> </span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"> <span style="font-size: 10pt;"> <span style="font-family: Symbol;"> <span style="color: black;">☐</span> </span> </span> </span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
| 510(k) Summary | |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Prepared: | August 30, 2022 |
| Submitter: | Ignite Orthopedics LLC<br>700 Park Ave.<br>Suite F<br>Winona Lake, IN 46590 |
| Contact: | Russ Parrott<br>Chief Technology Officer<br>Phone: 574.527.2864<br>russ.parrott@igniteorthopedics.com |
| Proprietary Name: | INHANCE TM Reverse Glenoid Peripheral Posts |
| Common Name: | Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty System |
| Classification: | Shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis; (21<br>CFR §888.3660); Class II, Pro Code PHX<br><br>Shoulder Joint, Metal/Polymer/Metal, Non-Constrained or Semi-<br>Constrained, Porous Coated, Uncemented Prosthesis (21 CFR<br>§888.3670); Class II, Pro Code MBF<br><br>Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer + Additive,<br>Cemented (21 CFR §888.3660); Class II, Pro Code PAO |
| Product Codes: | PHX, MBF, PAO |
| Predicate Devices: | K212737 (Primary) - INHANCE Reverse Shoulder System,<br>DePuy Ireland UC<br><br>K202611 - Catalyst OrthoScience R1 Reverse Shoulder System;<br>Catalyst OrthoScience, Inc. |
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### Reference Devices: K202716 - Ignite Anatomic Shoulder System; Ignite Orthopedics LLC
K183077 - Delta XTEND Reverse Shoulder System; DePuy (Ireland)
### Device Description:
The INHANCE REVERSE SHOULDER SYSTEM with Glenoid Peripheral Posts is intended for use in reverse total replacement procedures.
The Reverse Total Shoulder Prosthesis consists of individually packaged implants: a metal humeral stem (titanium alloy), a shell (titanium alloy), a liner (Cross-linked, VE UHMWPE) in combination with a glenosphere (cobalt-chromium), baseplate (titanium alloy), peripheral screws (titanium alloy), peripheral posts (titanium alloy), and either a central screw (titanium alloy) or a central post (titanium alloy).
The INHANCE REVERSE SHOULDER SYSTEM includes Peripheral Posts that are offered in 4MM, 6MM and 8MM lengths. The Peripheral Posts can be simply prepared for, and placed through, one of the peripheral holes of the Baseplate to increase contact area and aid in stability. This versatile option allows for interoperative flexibility and simple preparation to address various glenoid morphologies.
Note(s):
- . When using a Peripheral Post implant, the INHANCE Reverse Shoulder System is only indicated for use with a Central Screw and Peripheral Locking Screws that are 25mm or greater in length.
- . The Peripheral Post implants are only indicated for use in anterior, posterior, and superior glenoid defects.
{5}------------------------------------------------
### Intended Use / Indications for Use:
#### Reverse Total Shoulder
### The INHANCE SHOULDER SYSTEM Reverse Total Shoulder with a humeral
stem is indicated for primary, fracture or revision total reverse shoulder replacement procedures to address the following. The system is indicated for use in patients whose shoulder joint has a gross rotator cuff deficiency. The patient must be anatomically and structurally suited to receive the implants and a functional deltoid muscle is necessary. The system is also indicated for conversion from an anatomic to reverse shoulder prosthesis without the removal of a well-fixed INHANCE humeral stem.
- · A severely painful, disabling, arthritic joint
- Fractures of the humeral head (with Short Humeral Stems)
- · Fractures of the humeral head and proximal humerus (with Standard or Long Stems)
- · Revisions of previously failed shoulder joint replacements
#### Fixation Methods
The humeral stem is intended for cemented or cementless use. The glenoid baseplate components are intended for cementless application with the addition of screw fixation.
### Summary of Technologies/Substantial Equivalence:
The subject INHANCE Reverse Glenoid Peripheral Posts has the same indications for and intended use, material, sterilization, packaging, and bearing sizes as the previously cleared INHANCE Reverse Shoulder System, K212737. The difference between the subject and predicate device is that the subject glenoid has a modular peripheral post instead of a modular peripheral screw to aid in stability. Because of these similarities, the subject of this submission, the INHANCE Reverse Glenoid Peripheral Posts, is substantially equivalent to the predicate INHANCE Reverse Shoulder System, cleared in K212737 on April 21, 2022.
The subject INHANCE Reverse Glenoid Peripheral Posts has the same indications for and intended use, materials, fixation area, fixation options, and design intent as the previously cleared Catalyst OrthoScience R1 Reverse Shoulder System, K202611. Any noted differences do not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness.
{6}------------------------------------------------
### Non-Clinical Testing:
The INHANCE™ Reverse Shoulder System with Peripheral Posts underwent non-clinical testing and analyses using well-established methods to evaluate the change and to support a determination of substantial equivalence to the predicate device.
The following were completed:
### Range of Motion (RoM) Evaluation
An evaluation was conducted to ensure the RoM of the worst-case subject device components meet established specifications per ASTM F1378. The RoM targets were met. The subject Peripheral Posts do not represent a new worst-case component within the construct as it relates to range of motion when compared to the compatible implants cleared in K212737 (INHANCE Reverse Shoulder System).
### Construct Fatigue Testing
Construct fatigue testing was performed per ASTM F1378. The acceptance criteria were met.
### Construct Loosening and Disassociation
The INHANCETM Reverse Shoulder System was evaluated for loosening and disassociation per ASTM F2028-17. The acceptance criteria were met.
### Biocompatibility Assessments
The contact classification for the subject devices is Implant, Bone/Tissue with permanent contact (>30 days). A Biocompatibility Assessments was completed and provided per ISO 10993-1 and FDA Guidance Document Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process. The devices were found to be biocompatible. The materials and processes used in the manufacture of the Peripheral Posts and accessory instruments are identical to those used on implants and accessory instruments cleared in K212737 (INHANCE Reverse Shoulder System).
# Porous Structure Characterization
The porous structure used for the subject device is identical to the porous structure that was applied to the implants cleared under K202716 (INHANCE Anatomic Shoulder System) and K212737 (INHANCE Reverse Shoulder System).
{7}------------------------------------------------
## MRI Compatibility
Quantitative data was obtained to inform Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Conditional Labeling through the following evaluations:
- . Force: Static Magnetic Field Induced Displacement Force per ASTM F2052-15
- Torque: Static Magnetic Field Induced Torque per ASTM F2213-17 .
- Heating: Radiofrequency field (RF) induced heating per ASTM F2182-19e2 .
- Image Quality: Susceptibility induced image artifacts per ASTM F2119-07 .
The subject Peripheral Posts do not represent a new worst-case component within the construct as it relates to force, torque, heating, or image quality in the MR environment when compared to the compatible implants cleared in K212737 (INHANCE Reverse Shoulder System).
#### Shelf Life Evaluation
A shelf-life evaluation per ISO 11607-1 and ISO 11607-2 was completed on the packaging materials that make up the sterile barrier. A five-year shelf life was established based on the resultant data.
The subject Peripheral Posts use the same material and sterile packaging as the predicate implants cleared in K212737 (INHANCE Reverse Shoulder System) and, therefore, do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness as it relates to shelf-life.
### Sterilization Validation
Sterilization validation was completed using the VDmax method specified in ISO 11137-1 and ISO 11137-2. The Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) was found to be 10-6.
The subject Peripheral Posts use the same material, manufacturing locations, and sterile packaging as the predicate implants cleared in K212737 (INHANCE Reverse Shoulder System) and, therefore, do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness as it relates to device sterility.
### Clinical Testing:
Clinical testing was not necessary to demonstrate substantial equivalence of the INHANCE™ Reverse Glenoid Peripheral Posts to the predicate devices.
{8}------------------------------------------------
# Conclusion:
A comparison of the subject and predicate devices, including comparison of the intended use, technological characteristics, and non-clinical testing results has demonstrated that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.