The Access TSH (3rd IS) assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of human thyroid-stimulating hormone (thyrotropin, TSH, hTSH) levels in human serum and plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. Measurements of thyroid stimulating hormone produced by the anterior pituitary are used in the diagnosis of thyroid or pituitary disorders. This assay is capable of providing 3rd generation TSH results. The Dxl 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer is an in vitro diagnostic device used for the quantitative, semi-quantitative, or qualitative determination of various analyte concentrations found in human body fluids.
Device Story
Device is an automated, random-access chemiluminescent immunoassay analyzer (DxI 9000) using paramagnetic particles. Input: human serum or plasma samples. Principle: two-site sandwich immunoassay; sample reacts with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-hTSH antibody and paramagnetic particles coated with anti-hTSH antibody; magnetic field separates bound/unbound materials; chemiluminescent substrate added; luminometer measures light output proportional to analyte concentration. Output: numerical TSH concentration values. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel. System automates sample handling, incubation, washing, and signal detection. Results assist clinicians in diagnosing thyroid/pituitary disorders. Benefits include high-throughput, automated processing, and standardized quantitative results.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision/reproducibility studies (n=80 replicates per sample) showed total CVs ranging from 2.8% to 6.4%. Linearity confirmed across 0.01–50.0 μIU/mL range. Method comparison (n=111 samples) against Access 2 system yielded a correlation coefficient (r) of 1.00 and Passing-Bablok slope of 1.06. LoB/LoD/LoQ determined to be 0.002, 0.003, and 0.003 μIU/mL respectively. No clinical studies were required.
Technological Characteristics
Paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent sandwich immunoassay. Reagents: mouse monoclonal anti-hTSH antibodies, alkaline phosphatase conjugate, TRIS/ACES buffers, ProClin 300. Analyzer: DxI 9000 with luminometer, PMT detector, automated fluidics, and temperature-controlled modules. Connectivity: barcode sample identification, digital output. Software: automated calibration and data reduction. Sterilization: N/A (reagents).
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative determination of human TSH in serum and plasma to aid in diagnosis of thyroid or pituitary disorders.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A thyroid stimulating hormone test system is a device intended to measure thyroid stimulating hormone, also known as thyrotrophin and thyrotrophic hormone, in serum and plasma. Measurements of thyroid stimulating hormone produced by the anterior pituitary are used in the diagnosis of thyroid or pituitary disorders.
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT
I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K221225
B Applicant
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
C Proprietary and Established Names
Access TSH (3rd IS) Assay, DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JLW | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1690 - Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Test System | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
| JJE | Class I | 21 CFR 862.2160 - Discrete photometric chemistry analyzer for clinical use | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
New Device
B Measurand:
Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)
C Type of Test:
Quantitative chemiluminescent immunoassay
{1}
III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
B Indication(s) for Use:
The Access TSH (3rd IS) assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of human thyroid-stimulating hormone (thyrotropin, TSH, hTSH) levels in human serum and plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. Measurements of thyroid stimulating hormone produced by the anterior pituitary are used in the diagnosis of thyroid or pituitary disorders. This assay is capable of providing 3rd generation TSH results.
The DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer is an in vitro diagnostic device used for the quantitative, semi-quantitative, or qualitative determination of various analyte concentrations found in human body fluids.
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
D Special Instrument Requirements:
DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer
IV Device/System Characteristics:
A Device Description:
The DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer is an in vitro diagnostic device used for the quantitative, semi-quantitative, or qualitative determination of various analyte concentrations found in human body fluids. The analyzer subsystems include the luminometer, and components for handling fluids, compressed air, samples, and consumables. The DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer provides automated, continuous, random-access processing.
The Access TSH (3rd IS) reagent pack is ready to use and consists of the following reagents:
- R1a: Paramagnetic particles coated with mouse monoclonal anti-human TSH antibody suspended in TRIS buffered saline, with surfactant, bovine serum albumin (BSA), <0.1% sodium azide, and 0.1% ProClin 300.
- R1b: TRIS buffered saline with surfactant, BSA, protein (murine), < 0.1% sodium azide, and 0.1% ProClin 300.
- R1c: Mouse monoclonal anti-human TSH alkaline phosphatase conjugate in ACES buffered saline, with surfactant, BSA matrix, protein (murine), < 0.1% sodium azide, and 0.25% ProClin 300.
- R1d: Mouse monoclonal anti-human TSH alkaline phosphatase conjugate in ACES buffered saline, with surfactant, BSA matrix, protein (murine), < 0.1% sodium azide,
{2}
and
0.25\%
ProClin 300.
Reagent packs are made in two configurations to contain enough materials for 100 or 200 tests. Materials needed but not supplied with reagent kit include Access TSH (3rd IS) Calibrators, Quality Control (QC) materials, Access Wash Buffer II and Access Substrate (Lumi-Phos PRO).
## B Principle of Operation:
The Access TSH (3rd IS) assay is a two-site immunoenzymatic (“sandwich”) assay. A sample is added to a reaction vessel with mouse anti-hTSH-alkaline phosphatase conjugate, buffered protein solution and paramagnetic particles coated with immobilized mouse monoclonal anti-hTSH antibody. The hTSH binds to the immobilized monoclonal anti-hTSH antibody on the solid phase while the mouse anti-hTSH-alkaline phosphatase conjugate reacts with a different antigenic site on the hTSH. After incubation, materials bound to the solid phase are held in a magnetic field while unbound materials are washed away. Then, the chemiluminescent substrate is added to the vessel and light generated by the reaction is measured with a luminometer. The light production is directly proportional to the concentration of analyte in the sample. Analyte concentration is automatically determined from a stored multi-point calibration curve.
## C Instrument Description Information:
1. Instrument Name:
DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer
2. Specimen Identification:
Specimen identification can be done by a barcode or by manual entry. Barcode labels are read by the analyzer. Orders that are entered manually include the rack ID and position, so bar code labels are not necessary for sample identification.
3. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
Specimen sampling and handling procedures are analyte-specific and are documented in the specific reagent Instructions for Use (IFU).
4. Calibration:
Calibrators are packaged in sets and are dedicated to particular assays. The number of calibrators required is defined by the assay protocol file. Specific information is provided on a calibration card included with each calibrator set. This data can be entered into the system configuration using a virtual keyboard or the external barcode gun. Assay calibration can be performed when prompted by the DxI 9000 analyzer or when requested by the operator. Assay calibration data are automatically evaluated by the system, using acceptance criteria defined by the assay protocol file (APF). The calibration acceptance criteria are automatically applied to the data and acceptance or rejection of data occurs without operator intervention. A current (or active) assay calibration is required for each assay that is to be performed.
{3}
The DxI 9000 analyzer provides three types of assay calibrations.
- Quantitative calibrator results provide a multipoint calibration curve that is used to calculate the concentration of an analyte in a patient sample or control. A calibration curve is used to convert raw measurements in RLUs to specific analyte concentrations. Results are then expressed as numerical units.
- Semiquantitative calibrator results provide a multipoint calibration curve to which patient samples are compared in order to calculate a concentration value and categorize them into qualitative classes for the analyte such as reactive, non-reactive, or equivocal.
- Qualitative calibrator results provide a cutoff determined by a predefined formula defined in the APF. The analyzer compares a result to the cutoff and then expresses the result as reactive or non-reactive for the analyte.
## 5. Quality Control:
The labeling recommends that at least two levels of an appropriate quality control material be tested a minimum of once a day. The labeling also recommends that quality control testing should be performed in accordance with laboratory accreditation requirements, applicable laws and good laboratory practices.
## V Substantial Equivalence Information:
### A Predicate Device Name(s):
Access TSH (3rd IS) Assay
Access 2 Immunoassay System
### B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K153651
K121214
### C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K221225 | K153651 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Access TSH (3rd IS) Assay | Access TSH (3rd IS) Assay |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | The Access TSH (3rd IS) assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of human | Same |
{4}
| | thyroid-stimulating hormone (thyrotropin, TSH, hTSH) levels in human serum and plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. This assay is capable of providing 3rd generation TSH results. | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Analyte Measured | Human thyroid-stimulating hormone (thyrotropin, TSH, hTSH) | Same |
| Traceability | WHO 3rd International Reference Preparation Thyroid Stimulating Hormone, Human (NIBSC Coded 81/565) | Same |
| Technology | Sandwich immunoassay | Same |
| Format | Chemiluminescent | Same |
| Calibration | Utilizes a stored calibration curve | Same |
| Sample Type | Serum or plasma | Same |
| Sample Volume | Use 30 μL of sample for each determination in addition to the sample container and system dead volumes. Use 50 μL of sample in addition to the sample container and system dead volumes for each determination run with the automated dilution feature. | Same |
| Measuring Range | 0.01 – 50.0 μIU/mL | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Instrument | DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer | UniCel DxI 800 Immunoassay System |
| Substrate | Lumi-Phos PRO substrate | Access Substrate |
{5}
| Reagent Configurations | Two Configurations:1) 200 determinations, 2packs, 100 tests/pack(for predicate andcandidate instrument)2) 400 determinations, 2packs, 200 tests/pack(for candidateinstrument only) | One Configuration:200 determinations, 2packs, 100 tests/pack |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K221225 | K121214 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer | Access 2 Immunoassay System |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | For the quantitative, semi-quantitative, or qualitative determination of various analyte concentrations found in human body fluids. | Same |
| Signal Source | Photons generated by chemiluminescent substrate reacting with alkaline phosphatase. | Same |
| Signal Detector | Photomultiplier tube (PMT) | Same |
| Data Analysis | Internal data reduction methods via microcomputer | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Data Output | Digital display and PDF file creation | Digital display and printed alpha-numeric hard copy |
| Temperature Control | The following modules are temperature controlled:• Reaction build and reaction incubation• Substrate reaction zone• Reagent storage | The following modules are temperature controlled:• Reaction incubation• Substrate reaction zone• Reagent storage |
{6}
| | • Sample aliquot storage
• Reagent pipettors
• Dispense probes | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sample Loading Capacity | 133 sample containers | 60 sample containers |
| Sample Storage Capacity (on-board) | 268 sample vessels | None |
| Reagent Capacity | 50 Access Reagent packs on board | 24 Access Reagent packs on board. |
| Throughput (Maximum tests/hour) | Approximately 450 | Approximately 100 |
| Number of Reagent Pipettors | Four | One |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
CLSI EP05-A3: Evaluation of Precision of Qualitative Measurement Methods Procedures; Approved Guideline – Third Edition
CLSI EP06-Ed2: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures – 2nd Edition
CLSI EP25-A: Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents; Approved Guideline
IEC 62304 Edition 1.1 2015-06 CONSOLIDATED VERSION
IEC 62366-1 Edition 1.1 2020-06 CONSOLIDATED VERSION
ISO 15223-1 Third Edition 2016-11-01 Medical devices - Symbols to be used with information to be supplied by the manufacturer - Part 1: General requirements
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision studies were conducted to estimate repeatability and within-laboratory precision. The study was run on three DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzers and three reagent pack lots. Five serum samples with approximate TSH concentrations of 0.02, 0.4, 5.0, 12.0 and 50.0 $\mu$ IU/mL were used in the determination of imprecision. Each sample was assayed in duplicate, in two runs per day, over twenty days for a total of 40 runs and 80 replicates per instrument. Each instrument was evaluated with one reagent lot. The within-run, between-run, between-day, and total imprecision was calculated. Results from multiple lots were similar. Results from one representative lot are provided in the table below:
{7}
| Sample | n | Mean (μIU/mL) | Within-run | | Between-run | | Between-day | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD (μIU/mL) | CV (%) | SD (μIU/mL) | CV (%) | SD (μIU/ml) | CV (%) | SD (μIU/mL) | CV (%) |
| 1 | 80 | 0.022 | 0.0012 | 5.5 | 0.0003 | 1.5 | 0.0006 | 2.8 | 0.0014 | 6.4 |
| 2 | 80 | 0.36 | 0.009 | 2.6 | 0.007 | 2.0 | 0.008 | 2.3 | 0.014 | 4.0 |
| 3 | 80 | 4.7 | 0.12 | 2.5 | 0.06 | 1.3 | 0.07 | 1.4 | 0.15 | 3.2 |
| 4 | 80 | 12 | 0.4 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 4.3 |
| 5 | 80 | 46 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 2.8 |
A reproducibility study was conducted to assess instrument-to-instrument variability. Five serum samples with different TSH concentrations were run on three DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzers. The samples were tested across three reagent lots and one calibrator lot on each instrument with five replicates per run and one run per day over five days. The within-run, between-day, between-instrument, and reproducibility was calculated for each reagent lot. Results from multiple lots were similar. Results from one representative lot are provided below:
| | n | Mean (μIU/mL) | Repeatability Within-run | | Between day | | Between instrument | | Reproducibility | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD (μIU/mL) | CV (%) | SD (μIU/mL) | CV (%) | SD (μIU/ml) | CV (%) | SD (μIU/mL) | CV (%) |
| 1 | 75 | 0.024 | 0.0006 | 2.6 | 0.0004 | 1.8 | 0.0006 | 2.5 | 0.0010 | 4.0 |
| 2 | 75 | 0.37 | 0.012 | 3.3 | 0.010 | 2.8 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 0.016 | 4.3 |
| 3 | 75 | 4.8 | 0.11 | 2.3 | 0.14 | 2.8 | 0.04 | 0.7 | 0.18 | 3.7 |
| 4 | 75 | 12 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 0.5 | 3.8 |
| 5 | 75 | 46 | 1.1 | 2.4 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 3.4 |
# 2. Linearity:
Two studies were performed to determine the linearity of the Access TSH (3rd IS) assay on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer.
In Study One, serum samples covering the full analytical measuring range of the assay were used for the linearity determination. A native serum sample containing a low concentration of TSH and a high sample (prepared by spiking TSH antigen into a low serum sample) were mixed to make nine sample concentrations (0.002 - 58.545 $\mu$ IU/mL) evenly distributed across the analytical measuring range. The low sample was run in replicates of eight, and all other samples were run in replicates of four. This study was run on one DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzer, using three reagent lots and one calibrator lot. The deviation from linearity did not exceed 0.0000003 $\mu$ IU/mL for values $\leq 0.02$ $\mu$ IU/mL or $5\%$ for values $>0.02$ $\mu$ IU/mL. The results support the Access TSH (3rd IS) assay's claimed measuring range of 0.01 to $50.0~\mu \mathrm{IU / mL}$ .
In Study Two, serum samples covering the low end of the assay measuring range were used for the linearity determination. A native serum sample containing a low concentration of TSH and the high sample (prepared at a concentration near $5\mu \mathrm{IU} / \mathrm{mL}$ by spiking TSH antigen into a low serum sample) were mixed to make nine sample concentrations (0.002 - 4.898 $\mu \mathrm{IU} / \mathrm{mL}$ ) to achieve concentrations that covered the low range of the assay. The low
{8}
sample was run in replicates of eight, and all other samples were run in replicates of four. This study was run on one DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzer, using three reagent pack lots and one calibrator lot. The deviation from linearity did not exceed $0.000001\ \mu\mathrm{IU/mL}$ for values $\leq 0.02\ \mu\mathrm{IU/mL}$ or $6\%$ for values $>0.02\ \mu\mathrm{IU/mL}$. The results support the Access TSH (3rd IS) assay's claimed measuring range of 0.01 to $50.0\ \mu\mathrm{IU/mL}$.
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
The sponsor stated that the reagents for the Access TSH (3rd IS) reagent are unchanged in this submission. Therefore, specificity as reviewed in K153651 is adequate to describe the specificity of the candidate test system.
4. Assay Reportable Range:
See section VII.A.2 Linearity.
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
Traceability:
The measurand (TSH) in the Access TSH (3rd IS) Calibrator is traceable to WHO 3rd International Reference Preparation, (NIBSC Coded 81/565).
6. Detection Limit:
i. Limit of Blank (LoB)
The LoB study was run on three DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzers, using three reagent pack lots and one calibrator lot. Four S0 calibrator lots were used as sample for the LoB determination. Samples were tested over three days one run per day, five replicates per run, for each pack lot for a total of 180 replicates. The LoB was calculated for each lot and determined to be $0.002\ \mu\mathrm{IU/mL}$ using the $95\%$ non-parametric percentile of the replicates for each of three reagent lots.
ii. Limit of Detection (LoD)
The LoD study was run using eight serum samples with low TSH concentrations on three DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzers, using three reagent pack lots and one calibrator lot. In total, forty-five (45) replicates (nine replicates per day over five days) of each of the eight low serum samples were measured for the LoD determination. The LoD was calculated for each lot and determined to be $0.003\ \mu\mathrm{IU/mL}$ based on the precision model, multiplied by the $95^{\text{th}}$ percentile of the standard normal distribution and added to the LoB to calculate the LoD.
iii. Limit of Quantitation (LoQ)
The LoQ study was run using thirteen serum samples with low TSH concentrations. Samples were tested on three DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzers, using three reagent pack lots and one calibrator lot. Each of the samples were run in replicates of nine, in one run per
{9}
day, for five days on three reagent pack lots (45 replicates of each sample on each reagent lot). In total, one hundred thirty-five (135) replicates of each of the thirteen serum samples were measured for the LoQ determination. A variance components model was used to estimate the $\% \mathrm{CV}$ for each sample on each instrument and reagent lot combination. A log-log quadratic precision profile model was fitted to between-run $\% \mathrm{CV}$ versus observed sample mean. The fitted precision profile was used to calculate the $10\%$ CV LoQ for each combination of reagent lot and instrument. The claimed LoQ value is $0.003\mathrm{uIU / mL}$ .
| Analyte | LoB | LoD | LoQ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Access TSH (3rd IS) | 0.002 μIU/mL | 0.003 μIU/mL | 0.003 μIU/mL |
These studies support the Access TSH (3rd IS) assay's claimed measuring range of 0.01 to $50.0~\mu \mathrm{IU / mL}$ .
# 7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
# 8. Accuracy (Instrument):
See Section VII B1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device.
# 9. Carry-Over:
The DxI 9000 analyzer utilizes disposable pipette tips when aspirating and dispensing samples to minimize carryover associated with samples containing high concentrations of analyte. Studies were conducted to measure and assess the risk of carryover on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer. The results of the studies support that the risk of carryover based on the analyzer's design has been appropriately mitigated.
# B Comparison Studies:
# 1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
A method comparison study was performed comparing the Access TSH (3rd IS) assay on the DxI 9000 analyzer to the comparator device, the Access TSH (3rd IS) assay on the Access 2 Immunoassay System. A total of one hundred eleven (111) native serum samples were evaluated. The study was run on three DxI 9000 instruments and three Access 2 instruments with three reagent pack lots and three calibrator lots. The Passing-Bablok regression analysis results between Access TSH (3rd IS) DxI 9000 analyzer values (dependent variable, y) and the Access TSH (3rd IS) assay on the Access 2 Immunoassay System values (x, comparator), are shown below:
| N | Concentration Range (μIU/mL) | Intercept (95% CI) (μIU/mL) | Slope (95% CI) | Correlation Coefficient (r) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 111 | 0.01 - 47 | -0.019 (-0.10 to -0.0037) | 1.06 (1.04 to 1.07) | 1.00 |
{10}
2. **Matrix Comparison:**
Matrix comparison studies for serum (no gel), serum (gel) and lithium heparin plasma were reviewed in K153651.
**C Clinical Studies:**
1. **Clinical Sensitivity:**
Not applicable
2. **Clinical Specificity:**
Not applicable
3. **Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):**
Not applicable
**D Clinical Cut-Off:**
Not applicable
**E Expected Values/Reference Range:**
Reference range information was reviewed in K153651.
**F Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data:**
**VIII Proposed Labeling:**
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
**IX Conclusion:**
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.