World Knee Vit-E All-poly Tibial Inserts (CR, PS and UC), World Knee Vit-E Meniscal Inserts (CR, PS and UC)
Applicant
Signature Orthopaedics Pty, Ltd.
Product Code
JWH · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Apr 11, 2022
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3560
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The World Knee Total Knee System's intended use is for total knee replacement procedures in skeletally mature patients with structural joint damage. This is the same intended use as previously cleared for the World Knee Total Knee System, K190557 and K181530.
Device Story
Modular total knee replacement system comprising femoral component, meniscal insert, patella, and tibial baseplate (or all-polyethylene tibia). Components available in posterior stabilized or cruciate retaining variants. Used in orthopedic surgery to replace damaged knee joints. Surgeon implants components via cemented or cementless fixation. Device restores joint function and alleviates pain associated with degenerative or inflammatory joint disease, deformities, or fractures. Modification introduces Vitamin-E stabilized, 100 kGy crosslinked UHMWPE (Vit-E HXLPE) as an alternative material for tibial inserts to improve wear resistance and oxidation stability. Reusable instruments updated to facilitate surgical workflow.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data provided. Verification and validation included density (ASTM F648/D792), mechanical properties (ASTM F648, F2759, D695, F2183), thermal analysis (ASTM F2635), crosslink density (ASTM F2214), fatigue crack propagation (ASTM E647), oxidation challenge (ASTM F2003/F2102), residual free radical content (ASTM F2381), and wear resistance (ISO 14243) for 5 million cycles.
Technological Characteristics
Modular knee prosthesis. Materials: Wrought CoCrMo (ASTM F1537-11) for femoral; Wrought Ti6Al4V ELI (ASTM F136-13) for tibial baseplate; UHMWPE or Vit-E HXLPE for inserts/patella. Sterile (SAL 10^-6). Cemented or cementless fixation. Design includes posterior stabilized or cruciate retaining variants.
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients with adequate bone stock requiring knee replacement due to non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis), inflammatory degenerative joint disease (rheumatoid arthritis), functional deformity (varus, valgus, flexion), revision procedures, or unmanageable fractures.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a knee joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a femoral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a tibial component or components and a retropatellar resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
Predicate Devices
Signature Orthopaedics World Knee Total Knee System (K190577)
Signature Orthopaedics World Knee Total Knee System (K181530)
Signature Orthopaedics World Knee Total Knee System (K180570)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
April 11, 2022
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services seal on the left and the FDA acronym with the full name of the agency on the right. The seal features a stylized depiction of human figures, while the FDA part includes a blue square with "FDA" in white and the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Signature Orthopaedics Pty Ltd. Declan Brazil Managing Director 7 Sirius Road Lane Cove, NSW 2066 AUSTRALIA
## Re: K220737
Trade/Device Name: World Knee Total Knee System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3560 Regulation Name: Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JWH, MBH, OIY Dated: March 7, 2022 Received: March 14, 2022
Dear Declan Brazil:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Ting Song, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K220737
Device Name World Knee Total Knee System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The patient should be sketally mature to receive a knee replacement. Patients should have adequate bone stock and size to support and accept the prosthesis.
The patient's need for knee replacement should be due to one or more of the following conditions:
- · Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis.
- · Inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis.
- · Functional deformity such as varus, valgus or flexion deformities.
- · Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed.
- · Fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.
Signature Orthopaedic's World Knee replacement components may be intended for cemented or cementless use. Please verify whether the particular component is intented for cementless use by checking the package label.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
| Manufacturer: | Signature Orthopaedics Pty Ltd<br>7 Sirius Road<br>Lane Cove, NSW 2066<br>Australia |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Signature Orthopaedics Europe Ltd<br>Unit A, IDA Business & Technology Park Garrycastle<br>Athlone Westmeath N37 DY26<br>IRELAND |
| Device Trade<br>Name: | World Knee Total Knee System |
| Common Name: | Total Knee Prosthesis |
| Contact: | Dr. Declan Brazil<br>Managing Director of Signature Orthopaedics |
| Prepared By: | Signature Orthopaedics Pty Ltd<br>7 Sirius Road<br>Lane Cove, NSW 2066<br>Australia<br>Phone: +61 (2) 9428 5181<br>Fax: +61 (2) 8456 6065 |
| Date Prepared: | March 7th, 2022 |
| Classification: | Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial Polymer/Metal/Polymer Semi-<br>Constrained Cemented Prosthesis (JWH, 21 CFR 888.3560) |
| | Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial Semi-Constrained, Uncemented,<br>Porous, Coated, Polymer/Metal/Polymer (MBH, 888.3565) |
| | Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial Semi-Constrained, Cemented,<br>Polymer + Additive/Metal/Polymer + Additive (OIY, 888.3560) |
| Predicate Devices: | Primary Predicate<br>• Signature Orthopaedics World Knee Total Knee System<br>(K190577), Modular Titanium Baseplate |
| | • Signature Orthopaedics World Knee Total Knee System<br>(K181530), All Poly Tibial Baseplate |
| | Additional Predicate<br>• Signature Orthopaedics World Knee Total Knee System<br>(K180570) |
{4}------------------------------------------------
## Device Description:
The World Knee Total Knee System is a modular knee system consisting of a femoral component, meniscal insert, a patella and a tibial baseplate or all polyethylene tibia. The femoral component and meniscal inserts are available as posterior Stabilized or cruciate retaining variants. Cruciate retaining meniscal inserts are available as standard or ultracongruent designs. The tibial baseplate components covered in this 510(k) is made of Titanium as part of the cemented version. The patella components are available in a spherical or non-symmetrical designs.
The primary purpose of this Special 510(k) Device Modification to the World Knee System is to notify the FDA of the change in materials used to manufacture the tibial inserts (all variants (CR, PS and UC) of modular meniscal insert and all-poly tibial baseplate components) to Vitamin-E Stabilized, 100 kGy crosslinked UHMWPE (Vit-E HXLPE). This 510(k) also notifies the FDA of minor design updates to the implants and reusable instruments.
Materials: Wrought Cobalt-28Chromium-6Molybdenum Alloy (ASTM F1537-11) for the femoral component, Wrought Titanium-6Aluminium-4Vanadium ELI Alloy (Ti6Al4V ELI, ASTM F136-13) for the tibial baseplate components, Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) for all variants of the patellar implants, Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) or Vit-E HXLPE for the Allpoly tibial baseplate components and modular meniscal tibial inserts.
## Indications for Use:
The patient should be skeletally mature to receive a knee replacement. Patients should have adequate bone stock and size to support and accept the prosthesis.
The patient's need for knee replacement should be due to one or more of the following conditions:
- . Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis.
- . Inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis.
- . Functional deformity such as varus, valgus or flexion deformities.
- . Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed.
- . Fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.
Signature Orthopaedic's World Knee replacement components may be intended for cemented or cementless use. Please verify whether the particular component is intended for cemented or cementless use by checking the package label.
## Intended Use:
The World Knee Total Knee System's intended use is for total knee replacement procedures in skeletally mature patients with structural joint damage. This is the same intended use as previously cleared for the World Knee Total Knee System, K190557 and K181530.
## Comparison of Technological Characteristics:
The World Knee Total Knee System described in this Special 510(k) Device Modification is fundamentally the same device as the primary predicate device cleared
{5}------------------------------------------------
in K190577 and K181530. The technological characteristics that remain the same for the World Knee Total Knee System are as follows:
- . Clinical Indications for Use, Intended Use and Surgical Techniques for the World Knee Variant and the World Knee Total Knee System are identical.
- . The main components of the World Knee Variant use the same materials during the manufacturing process. This includes:
- O Wrought Cobalt-28Chromium-6Molybdenum Alloy (ASTM F1537-11) for the femoral component.
- o Wrought Titanium-6Aluminium-4Vanadium ELI Alloy (Ti6Al4V ELI, ASTM F136-13) for the tibial baseplate components.
- o Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) for all variants of the patellar implant,
- O Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) option for Allpoly tibial baseplates and modular meniscal tibial inserts.
- . The manufacturing process of the World Knee Variant in question has the same manufacturing process as the World Knee Total Knee System. This includes cleaning and passivation, packaging, transportation and sterilisation.
- The World Knee Variant has the same geometry and fundamental design as the World Knee Total Knee System. All interconnections between components are the same.
- . All implants are provided sterile with SAL of 10t as seen in the World Knee Total Knee System.
- . The World Knee Variant has the same body contact as the World Knee Total Knee System and as such has the same contact stresses
The primary differences between the subject and primary predicate World Knee devices are as follows:
- . Vitamin-E Stabilized and 100 kGy crosslinked UHMWPE (Vit-E HXLPE) material was added as an option for manufacturing of the tibial inserts (All-poly tibial baseplate components and modular meniscal tibial insert); and
- . Updates to the reusable instruments were made to facilitate surgery and improve usability.
## Performance Testing:
Engineering evaluations were conducted to verify that the performance of the World Knee with Vitamin-E Poly Tibial Insert variants is equal to and/or better than the predicate device and therefore adequate for anticipated in-vivo use. The following V&V activities were conducted:
- . V&V of substantial equivalence and/or superiority of performance characteristics and material properties of the Vit-E HXLPE relative to the standard UHMWPE for the:
- o Density as per ASTM F648 and D792;
- Mechanical Properties as per ASTM F648, F2759, D695 and F2183; O
- Melting Point. Crystallinity and Enthalpy of Fusion as per ASTM F26351; O
{6}------------------------------------------------
- Swell Ratio and Crosslink Density as per ASTM F2214; O
- o Fatigue Crack Propagation and Coefficient as per ASTM E647;
- Oxidation Challenge as per ASTM F2003 and analysis as per ASTM F2102 O (both 2 and 6-weeks accelerated aging);
- o ESR Testing for residual free radical content and Transvinylene Index (TVI) as per ASTM F2381; and
- Resistance to wear for 5 million cycles as per ISO 14243 Part 1 and 2. O
- . Verification of substantial equivalence of the mechanical integrity of the Vit-E HXLPE tibial insert components including the baseplate locking mechanism relative to the standard UHMWPE tibial insert.
- . Risk Analysis and Design Control Review found no new or changed risks relative to the Indications for Use and Efficacy of the Subject Device.
## Substantial Equivalence Conclusion:
The results of the V&V testing, associated engineering review, risk analysis and design control activities demonstrated substantial equivalence of the subject World Knee Total Knee System to the primary predicate cited herein.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.