Biosci™ Inactivated Transport Medium (Biosci™ ITM) is intended for the collection, inactivation, stabilization and transportation of an unprocessed upper respiratory clinical specimen suspected of containing influenza A virus RNA from the collection site to the testing laboratory. The specimen collected in Biosci™ ITM is suitable for use with compatible molecular assays.
Device Story
Biosci™ ITM is a transport medium for upper respiratory specimens; contains detergent and protein denaturant (guanidine salt) to inactivate influenza A virus, lyse cells, and stabilize viral RNA. Provided in screw-cap tubes (1, 2, or 3 mL) or kits with nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, or mid-turbinate swabs. Used by clinicians at point-of-care or collection sites; specimens transported to laboratories for molecular testing. Device inactivates virus to improve biosafety during handling; stabilizes RNA for up to 14 days at 2-25°C. Output is a stabilized clinical specimen suitable for downstream molecular assays (e.g., RT-PCR).
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Analytical studies included Limit of Detection (LoD) confirmation (0.2 TCID50/mL for Flu A), viral RNA stability (14 days at 2-25°C), and viral inactivation efficacy (>4.0 log reduction within 10 seconds). Stability was verified across multiple lots, including aged and newly manufactured media, using RT-PCR assays. Inactivation was confirmed via cell culture (MDCK cells) and cytopathic effect (CPE) observation.
Technological Characteristics
Media contains guanidine hydrochloride, EDTA disodium salt, trisodium citrate, Tris, TCEP, HCl, Antifoam A, and NP-40. Supplied in screw-cap polypropylene tubes (1, 2, or 3 mL) with nylon flocked swabs. Shelf-life is 18 months. Non-automated, chemical stabilization device.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the collection, stabilization, and transport of unprocessed upper respiratory clinical specimens suspected of containing influenza A virus RNA for use with compatible molecular assays.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A microbial nucleic acid storage and stabilization device is a device that consists of a container and reagents intended to stabilize microbial nucleic acids in human specimens for subsequent isolation and purification of nucleic acids for further molecular testing. The device is not intended for preserving morphology or viability of microorganisms.
Special Controls
The special controls for this device are: (1) The intended use for the 21 CFR 809.10 labeling must include a detailed description of microorganisms and types of human specimens intended to be preserved. (2) The 21 CFR 809.10(b) labeling must include: (i) A detailed device description, including all device components. (ii) Performance characteristics from applicable analytical studies, including but not limited to, nucleic acid stability and microorganism inactivation. (iii) A limiting statement that erroneous results may occur when the transport device is not compatible with molecular testing. (iv) A limiting statement that the device has only been validated to preserve the representative microorganisms used in the analytical studies. (3) Design verification and validation must include the following: (i) Overall device design including all device components and all control elements incorporated into the analytical validation procedures. (ii) Thorough description of the microorganisms and methodology used in the validation of the device including, but not limited to, extraction platforms and assays used for the detection of preserved nucleic acids. (iii) The limit of detection (LoD) of the molecular test used to establish microorganism nucleic acid stability.
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) The intended use for the labeling required under § 809.10 of this chapter must include a detailed description of microorganisms and types of human specimens intended to be preserved.
(2) The labeling required under § 809.10(b) of this chapter must include the following:
(i) A detailed device description, including all device components;
(ii) Performance characteristics from applicable analytical studies, including nucleic acid stability and microorganism inactivation;
(iii) A limiting statement that erroneous results may occur when the transport device is not compatible with molecular testing; and
(iv) A limiting statement that the device has only been validated to preserve the representative microorganisms used in the analytical studies.
(3) Design verification and validation must include the following:
(i) Overall device design, including all device components and all control elements incorporated into the analytical validation procedures;
(ii) Thorough description of the microorganisms and methodology used in the validation of the device including, extraction platforms and assays used for the detection of preserved nucleic acids; and
(iii) The limit of detection (LoD) of the molecular test used to establish microorganism nucleic acid stability.
Predicate Devices
eNAT® - molecular collection and preservation medium (K201849)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K220059
B Applicant
Shenzhen Dakewe Bio-engineering Co., Ltd.
C Proprietary and Established Names
Biosci Inactivated Transport Medium, Biosci ITM
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| QBD | Class II | 21 CFR 866.2950 - Microbial Nucleic Acid Storage And Stabilization Device | MI - Microbiology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
To make a substantial equivalence determination for the Biosci Inactivated Transport Medium for the collection, inactivation, stabilization, and transport of upper respiratory specimens to the laboratory for downstream testing using molecular assays.
B Measurand:
Storage and stability of nucleic acids from influenza A virus.
C Type of Test:
Microbial nucleic acid storage and stabilization device.
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
B Indication(s) for Use:
Biosci Inactivated Transport Medium (Biosci ITM) is intended for the collection, inactivation, stabilization and transportation of an unprocessed upper respiratory clinical specimen suspected of containing influenza A virus RNA from the collection site to the testing laboratory. The specimen collected in Biosci ITM is suitable for use with compatible molecular assays.
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
D Special Instrument Requirements:
None
IV Device/System Characteristics:
A Device Description:
Biosci ITM contains a detergent and a protein denaturant to inactivate influenza A, lyse cells, disrupt lipid membranes, denature proteins and enzymes, and preserve and stabilize influenza A RNA. Therefore, Biosci ITM is not intended to be used for culture-based techniques. A specimen bag is also provided for safe transportation of specimens, as well as providing appropriate biosafety warning.
Biosci ITM has different configurations:
- A screw-cap tube filled with 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 mL of Biosci ITM.
- A screw-cap tube filled with a range of media and package with a nasopharyngeal swab for nasopharyngeal specimen collection.
- A screw-cap tube filled with a range of media and package with an oropharyngeal swab for oropharyngeal specimen collection.
- A screw-cap tube filled with a range of media and package with a mid-turbinate swab for mid-turbinate specimen collection.
B Principle of Operation:
The device components are intended to inactivate influenza A lyse cells, disrupt/lyse lipid membranes, denatures proteins, inactivates enzymes, and stabilize influenza A RNA. The transport device is designed for storage of specimens between 36-39 and 77 °F (between 2-8°C and 25 °C) for up to 14 days. The media contains the following reagents:
K220059 - Page 2 of 9
{2}
- Guanidine hydrochloride
- EDTA disodium salt dihydrate
- Trisodium citrate dihydrate
- Tris
- TCEP
- HCl
- Antifoam A Concentrate
- NP-40
- Distilled water
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
eNAT molecular collection and preservation medium
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K201849
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | Device: K220059 | Predicate: K201849 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Biosci Inactivated Transport Medium | eNAT molecular collection and preservation medium |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | Biosci Inactivated Transport Medium (Biosci ITM) is intended for the collection, inactivation, stabilization and transportation of an unprocessed upper respiratory clinical specimen suspected of containing influenza A virus RNA from the collection site to the testing laboratory. The specimen collected in Biosci ITM is suitable for use with compatible molecular assays. | Copan eNAT- molecular collection and preservation medium- is intended for the stabilization, transportation and inactivation of an unprocessed upper respiratory clinical specimen suspected of containing influenza A virus RNA. eNAT- molecular collection and preservation medium- is intended for use with compatible molecular assays. |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
K220059 - Page 3 of 9
{3}
| Single use device | Yes | Same |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Specimen types | Upper respiratory specimens | Same |
| Microorganism nucleic acids preserved | Influenza A virus | Same |
| Container | Tube; plastic; conical bottom self-standing with a screw cap | Same |
| Shelf-life | 18 months | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Media formulation | -Guanidine hydrochloride
-EDTA disodium salt dihydrate
-Trisodium citrate dihydrate
-Tris
-TCEP
-HCl
-Antifoam A Concentrate
-NP-40
-Distilled water | -Tris-EDTA
-Guanidine thiocyanate
-Detergent
-HEPES
-Distilled water |
| Media volume | 1, 2, and 3 mL | 2 mL |
| Swabs | Nylon flocked swabs (oropharyngeal, nasopharyngeal, mid-turbinate) | Nylon flocked swabs (oropharyngeal and mid-turbinate) |
| Specimen stability | Up to 14 days at 2-25°C | Up to 28 days at 2-25°C |
| Storage temperature | 18-25°C | 2-25°C |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
1. ISO 11737-1 Third edition 2018-01 Sterilization of health care products - Microbiological methods - Part 1: Determination of a population of microorganisms on product
2. ISO 11137-2 Third edition 2013-06-01 Sterilization of health care products - Radiation - Part 2: Establishing the sterilization dose
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
K220059 - Page 4 of 9
{4}
K220059 - Page 5 of 9
# Shelf-life:
a. The shelf life for the Biosci ITM is 18 months, after the date of manufacture, when stored at room temperature (18-25°C). The stability of the Biosci ITM was performed using Realtime stability on a total of three (3) lots. Stability studies included assessment of the bacteriostatic effect in the media, media properties including, appearance, and pH.
b. The shelf life for the nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and mid-turbinate Disposable Sterile Swab is 18 months after the date of manufacture. The stability of the Disposable Sterile Swab was performed using ongoing Realtime stability on a total of three (3) lots for each swab type stored at room temperature (18-25°C). Stability looked for microbial barrier system, appearance, mechanical properties and sterility.
Sterilization: The Biosci ITM tube and media are not sold as sterile nor are they intended to be sterilized by the user. These vials are single use devices. The appropriate Disposable Sterile Swab type (which may be included with the media) are sterilized according to ISO 11737-1 and ISO 11137-2 via e-beam irradiation to achieve a Sterility Assurance Level of 10⁻⁶. Therefore, the Disposable Sterile Swabs are individually packaged and sold as sterile.
# 2. Detection Limit:
a. Limit of Detection Study:
LoD testing was conducted to determine the lowest concentration of analyte that can be detected with a greater than 95% detection rate. The LoD studies for Influenza A were designed using a validated RT-PCR assay to establish a concentration of Influenza A used for additional testing noted below.
LoD testing was initially performed by spiking Influenza A (Flu A, H1N1 ATCC VR-1736 A/Virginia/ATCC1/2009; original concentration is 1.2 x 10⁸ TCID₅₀/mL) into negative pooled nasopharyngeal clinical matrix. A 50 μL volume of the Flu A/matrix mixtures, of various concentrations, were individually added to each sterile swab that were then eluted into 450 μL Biosci ITM to yield concentrations of 5.0, 1.0, 0.20, 0.04 and 0.008 TCID₅₀/mL. A negative control was created by adding 50 μL negative nasopharyngeal matrix onto a sterile swab that was then eluted into 450 μL Biosci ITM to obtain a Flu A-free sample. Each concentration was analyzed in 4 replicates. A validated RT-PCR assay was used to determine the preliminary LoD to be 0.2 TCID₅₀/mL for Flu A. No detection (Ct ≥ 40) was observed at less than 0.2 TCID₅₀/mL concentration. All other higher concentrations demonstrated recovery of Flu A. Table 1 below shows the results of preliminary LoD testing for Flu A.
Table 1: Preliminary LoD summary for Flu A
| Influenza A Concentration (TCID_{50}/mL) | Biosci ITM 4 Reps Mean (Ct) | SD (Ct) | % Detection |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5.0 | 29.18 | 0.19 | 100 |
| 1.0 | 32.54 | 0.53 | 100 |
| 0.20 | 35.64 | 0.48 | 100 |
{5}
Confirmatory LoD testing was then performed using Flu A samples prepared as described above to final concentrations of 1.0, 0.2, 0.04, and 0.008 TCID $_{50}$ /mL. A total of 24 replicates were analyzed for each concentration and 100% of replicates were detected for Flu A at 1.0 and 0.2 TCID $_{50}$ /mL and met the pre-defined acceptance criteria. The LoD was confirmed as 0.2 TCID $_{50}$ /mL and is considered the LoD of the assay. The data is presented in table 2 below.
Table 2: Confirmatory LoD summary for Flu A
| | Ct Values* | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | 1.0 TCID50/mL | 0.2 TCID50/mL | 0.04 TCID50/mL | 0.008 TCID50/mL |
| 24 Replicates | 32.42 | 36.2 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.08 | 35.84 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.15 | 34.26 | >40 | >40 |
| | 31.99 | 35.70 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.27 | 36.28 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.32 | 35.79 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.15 | 36.68 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.31 | 35.68 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.27 | 34.73 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.11 | 35.16 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.20 | 35.12 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.01 | 35.09 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.35 | 36.30 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.09 | 35.84 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.21 | 36.29 | 38.68 | >40 |
| | 31.81 | 36.20 | >40 | >40 |
| | 31.99 | 36.02 | >40 | >40 |
| | 31.99 | 36.50 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.08 | 35.52 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.16 | 36.35 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.25 | 36.16 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.06 | 34.83 | >40 | >40 |
| | 31.79 | 36.99 | >40 | >40 |
| | 32.33 | 35.49 | >40 | >40 |
| AVG (Ct) | 32.14 | 35.79 | >40 | >40 |
| SD (Ct) | 0.16 | 0.67 | N/A | N/A |
| % Detection | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
*Ct value of <37 is defined as positive result and >40 is defined as no detection in this assay.
b. Viral Nucleic Acid Stability Study:
The stability of influenza A virus (Flu A, H1N1 ATCC VR-1736) at 5X the LoD of 0.2 TCID $_{50}$ /mL (i.e., test concentration at 1.0 TCID $_{50}$ /mL) was evaluated by spiking virus into negative clinical nasopharyngeal matrix. A 50 μL volume of the virus/matrix mixture was then inoculated onto sterile swabs that were then incubated in 450 μL Biosci ITM at
K220059 - Page 6 of 9
{6}
ambient temperature $(25^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ for 28 days, and refrigerated temperature $(2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ for 28 days. A negative control was created by adding $50~\mu \mathrm{L}$ negative nasopharyngeal matrix onto a sterile swab that was also incubated in $450~\mu \mathrm{L}$ Biosci ITM to obtain a Flu A-free sample. A validated RT-PCR assay was used to determine the ability of the media to stabilize Flu A nucleic acids in Biosci ITM. The stability study analyzed a total of six lots; two lots five months post expiration date, two lots within the validity period (Biosci ITM has a claimed 18-month stability), and two newly manufactured lots. Four tubes from each lot were tested at each time point totaling 24 replicates tested at each time point and each temperature range. An initial time point designated as Day 0 was included as the initial Ct average for each of the two temperature ranges tested. Testing at four time points was performed at Day 0, 7, 14 and 28 for refrigerated temperature $(2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ and ambient temperature $(25^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ to support a claim of Flu A nucleic acid stability for 14 days. A pre-defined acceptance criteria of $(+/-)$ 3.0 Ct from the initial time zero value and SD $< 1$ were the acceptance criteria. The data for the 14 days stability claim is shown below for ambient temperature $(25^{\circ}\mathrm{C};$ Table 3) and refrigerated temperature $(2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C};$ Table 4).
Table 3: Flu A stability at ${25}^{ \circ }\mathrm{C}$
| Days (25°C) | 0 | 7 | 14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AVG (Ct): | 32.20 | 32.03 | 31.55 |
| Variation (Ct): | - | -0.17 | -0.65 |
| SD (Ct): | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.28 |
Table 4: Flu A stability at ${2 - 8}^{ \circ }\mathrm{C}$
| Days (2-8°C) | 0 | 7 | 14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AVG (Ct): | 32.26 | 31.97 | 31.58 |
| Variation (Ct): | - | -0.29 | -0.68 |
| SD (Ct): | 0.22 | 0.29 | 0.31 |
The results indicate that the RNA from Flu A whole virus spiked into nasopharyngeal matrix and stored in Biosci ITM resulted in a maximum variation of $0.65\mathrm{Ct}$ for 14 days at $25^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ and a maximum variation of $0.68\mathrm{Ct}$ for 14 days at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ , indicating no effect of media age on the ability of Biosci ITM to stabilize Flu A nucleic acid. At each time point and each temperature, all average Ct values measured resulted in a difference $< 3.0$ Ct and all SD values are $< 1$ , when compared to day 0, which indicated that the results met the pre-defined acceptance criteria and supports a claim for Flu A viral RNA stability in Biosci ITM for 14 days. Additionally, data indicate that Flu A plus matrix, stored at the indicated temperatures and time points, in the absence of Biosci ITM, could not be detected post day 0. All negative control had no Flu A nucleic acid detection.
# c. Inactivation Study:
Test group samples were created with Influenza A live virus (Flu A, H1N1 ATCC VR-1736), diluted in negative nasopharyngeal matrix, to a final concentration of $1.2 \times 10^{9}$ , $1.2 \times 10^{8}$ , and $1.2 \times 10^{7} \mathrm{TCID}_{50} / \mathrm{ml}$ . A $50~\mu \mathrm{L}$ volume of each virus concentration from the
K220059 - Page 7 of 9
{7}
test group was added to individual sterile swabs that were then incubated in $450~\mu \mathrm{L}$ Biosci ITM for 10, 20, or 30 seconds at room temperature (1:10 dilution). As negative controls, Biosci ITM and negative nasopharyngeal matrix were individually diluted 1:1000 with DMEM. As positive controls, Flu A only or Flu A added to negative nasopharyngeal matrix to reach each of the concentrations above, were each then further diluted 1:10,000 with DMEM. Negative and positive control samples were added directly to MDCK cells without incubation. After the test group was incubated at the times and temperature above, all samples were then individually diluted 1:1000 with DMEM and inoculated onto MDCK cells at three replicates each and incubated for four days at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . After incubation, the cells were fixed and stained with $1\%$ crystal violet in $80\%$ acetone. Cells that did not take up the stain were considered evidence of a viral cytopathic effect (CPE). Therefore, CPE was considered a measure of viral viability.
The titer of the virus CPE was calculated and recorded as the $\mathrm{TCID}_{50}$ . When no CPE was observed or observed at a level below a set threshold, that was taken as an indication of effective virus inactivation.
# Inactivation time:
The Biosci ITM showed no cytotoxicity on MDCK cells at a 1:1,000 dilution factor with DMEM culture media; therefore at least a 1:1,000 dilution factor is needed to avoid a direct effect on cellular integrity caused by the Biosci ITM which would prevent appropriate evaluation and interpretation. Influenza A was therefore exposed to Biosci ITM for 10, 20, and 30 seconds, at room temperature, prior to 1:1000 dilution with DMEM and incubation with MDCK cells (final concentrations of $1.2 \times 10^{5}$ , $1.2 \times 10^{4}$ , and $1.2 \times 10^{3} \mathrm{TCID}_{50} / \mathrm{mL}$ ). Positive controls showed cytopathic effect (CPE) on MDCK cells and negative controls did not (Table 5). The Biosci ITM rapidly inactivated Influenza A virus with a $>4.0$ log reduction at a 1:10 specimen to inactivation media concentration at 10 seconds (Table 6). Viral CPE was not observed at $<10^{3} \mathrm{TCID}_{50} / \mathrm{mL}$ due to viral destruction by the Biosci ITM, see Table 6 below. Also as noted in the table, CPE was still present in samples with starting viral concentrations of $\geq 10^{9} \mathrm{TCID}_{50} / \mathrm{mL}$ . Although reduced by $\geq 5$ logs by the Biosci ITM, CPE was observed because this high viral concentration is outside the working range of the cell culture-based assay and the effect of the inactivation media can no longer be adequately assessed. Data from the lower viral concentrations are used to assess the inactivation effect and was acceptable.
Table 5: Flu A Inactivation Study Data Summary for Control Groups
| | Preincubation (TCID50) | Presence of CPE |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Flu A only | 1.2 x 105 | Yes |
| | 1.2 x 104 | Yes |
| | 1.2 x 103 | Yes |
| Flu A and matrix | 1.2 x 105 | Yes |
| | 1.2 x 104 | Yes |
| | 1.2 x 103 | Yes |
| Matrix only | - | No |
| Biosci ITM only * | - | No |
*Biosci ITM showed no cytotoxicity on MDCK cells when diluted to 1:1,000.
Table 6: Flu A Inactivation Study Data Summary at Room Temperature
K220059 - Page 8 of 9
{8}
| Sample | Starting Flu A concentration | 10s incubation (TCID50 LogΔ) | 20s incubation (TCID50 LogΔ) | 30s incubation (TCID50 LogΔ) | Presence of CPE |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Flu A, matrix and Biosci ITM | 1.2 x 10^{9} | ≥-5.0 | ≥-5.0 | ≥-5.0 | Yes |
| | 1.2 x 10^{8} | >-5.0 | >-5.0 | >-5.0 | No |
| | 1.2 x 10^{7} | >-4.0 | >-4.0 | >-4.0 | No |
*Biosci ITM showed no cytotoxicity on MDCK cells when diluted to 1:1,000.
Influenza A samples must be used at a ratio of at least 1:10 in Biosci ITM media at a minimum of 10 seconds exposure time to demonstrate inactivation of influenza A. Measuring Influenza inactivation below $1 \times 10^{3} \mathrm{TCID}_{50} / \mathrm{mL}$ was not possible because of the cytotoxic affects Biosci ITM has on the cell culture-based assay.
## VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
## IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K220059 - Page 9 of 9
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.