K213659 · Medicrea International SA · OWI · May 24, 2022 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K213659
Device Name
LigaPASS™ 2.0 Ligament Augmentation System
Applicant
Medicrea International SA
Product Code
OWI · Orthopedic
Decision Date
May 24, 2022
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3010
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Pediatric
Indications for Use
The LigaPASS™ system is an implant for use in orthopaedic surgery. The system is intended to provide temporary stabilization as a bone anchor during the development of solid bony fusion and id in the repair of bone fractures. The indications for use are as follows: · Spinal trauma surgery, used in sublaminar or facet wiring techniques; · Spinal reconstructive surgery, incorporated into constructs for the purpose of correction of spinal deformities such as idiopathic and neuromuscular scoliosis in patients 8 years of age and older, adults scoliosis and kyphosis; · Spine degenerative surgery as an adjunct to spinal fusions. · Intended for use with a posterior spinal instrumentation construct when ligamentation is needed. The LigaPASS™ system may also be used in conjunction with other medical implants made of titanium or cobalt-chrome alloy whenever "wiring" may help secure the attachment of other implants.
Device Story
LigaPASS™ 2.0 is a ligament augmentation system used in orthopaedic spinal surgery to provide temporary stabilization and bone anchorage. The system consists of a polyester (PET) band with malleable pure titanium (T40) leads and a titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) connector. Surgeons lace the PET band around the vertebra, bypassing the need for pedicle screws or hooks, and secure it to a rod using the connector. The system is used in conjunction with posterior thoracolumbar fixation constructs to restore balance and stability, mimicking anatomical muscle and ligament functionality. It is operated by surgeons in a clinical setting. The output is a secure rod-to-bone connection, which aids in spinal deformity correction and fusion. The device benefits patients by providing an alternative to traditional screw-based anchorage, potentially reducing anatomical constraints during construct assembly.
Clinical Evidence
No new bench or animal testing was performed. Non-clinical performance was validated via previous 510(k) submissions (K172021, K173506). Clinical evidence supporting the use of ligament augmentation with the LigaPASS™ system in adult spinal deformity surgery was provided via literature (Safaee et al., J Neurosurg Spine, 2018).
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Polyester (PET) braid, pure titanium (T40) leads, and titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) connector body/set screws. Materials comply with ASTM F136 and ISO 5832-3. System includes PET bands, connectors, and ergonomic instrumentation (tensioners, torque-limiting tools). Compatible with 5.5mm to 6.0mm titanium or cobalt-chrome rods. Mechanical fixation principle.
Indications for Use
Indicated for spinal trauma (sublaminar/facet wiring), spinal reconstructive surgery (idiopathic/neuromuscular scoliosis in patients ≥8 years, adult scoliosis/kyphosis), and degenerative spine surgery as an adjunct to fusion. Intended for use with posterior spinal instrumentation when ligament augmentation is required.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A bone fixation cerclage is a device intended to be implanted that is made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and that consists of a metallic ribbon or flat sheet or a wire. The device is wrapped around the shaft of a long bone, anchored to the bone with wire or screws, and used in the fixation of fractures.
{0}------------------------------------------------
May 24, 2022
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: on the left, there is a symbol representing the Department of Health & Human Services, and on the right, there is the text "FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue. The text is arranged in two lines, with "FDA" being larger and bolder than the rest of the text.
Medicrea International S.A. % Justin Eggleton Vice President, Spine Regulatory Affairs MCRA, LLC. 803 7th Street NW Washington, District of Columbia 20001
Re: K213659
Trade/Device Name: LigaPASS™ 2.0 Ligament Augmentation System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3010 Regulation Name: Bone fixation cerclage Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OWI Dated: April 22, 2022 Received: April 22, 2022
## Dear Justin Eggleton:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Colin O'Neill, M.B.E. Assistant Director DHT6B: Division of Spinal Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
### 510(k) Number (if known) K213659
#### Device Name
LigaPASS™ 2.0 Ligament Augmentation System
### Indications for Use (Describe)
The LigaPASS™ system is an implant for use in orthopaedic surgery. The system is intended to provide temporary stabilization as a bone anchor during the development of solid bony fusion and id in the repair of bone fractures. The indications for use are as follows:
· Spinal trauma surgery, used in sublaminar or facet wiring techniques;
· Spinal reconstructive surgery, incorporated into constructs for the purpose of correction of spinal deformities such as
idiopathic and neuromuscular scoliosis in patients 8 years of age and older, adults scoliosis and kyphosis;
· Spine degenerative surgery as an adjunct to spinal fusions.
· Intended for use with a posterior spinal instrumentation construct when ligamentation is needed.
The LigaPASS™ system may also be used in conjunction with other medical implants made of titanium or cobalt-chrome alloy whenever "wiring" may help secure the attachment of other implants.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
| Device Trade Name: | LigaPASSTM 2.0 Ligament Augmentation System | |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| Manufacturer: | Medicrea International S.A.<br>5389 Route De Strasbourg-Vancia<br>Rillieux-La-Pape 69140, France | |
| Contact: | Justin Eggleton<br>Vice President, Spine Regulatory Affairs<br>(202) 552-5804<br>jeggleton@mcra.com | |
| Prepared by: | MCRA, LLC<br>803 7th Street NW<br>Washington, DC 20001<br>Office: 202.552.5800 | |
| Date Prepared: | May 18, 2022 | |
| Classification: | Bone fixation cerclage | |
| Class: | II | |
| Product Code: | OWI (21 CFR §888.3010) | |
| Primary Predicate: | LigaPASSTM 2.0 Band and Dual Band (K173506) | |
| Additional Predicate: | LigaPASS™ 2.0 Medial and Medial Open<br>Connector (K172021), Pass LP (K112736) | |
## Indications For Use:
The LigaPASS™ system is an implant for use in orthopaedic surgery. The system is intended to provide temporary stabilization as a bone anchor during the development of solid bony fusion and aid in the repair of bone fractures. The indications for use are as follows:
- Spinal trauma surgery, used in sublaminar or facet wiring techniques; ●
- Spinal reconstructive surgery, incorporated into constructs for the purpose of correction ● of spinal deformities such as idiopathic and neuromuscular scoliosis in patients 8 years of age and older, adults scoliosis and kyphosis;
- Spine degenerative surgery as an adjunct to spinal fusions. ●
- Intended for use with a posterior spinal instrumentation construct when ligament o augmentation is needed.
{4}------------------------------------------------
The LigaPASS™ system may also be used in conjunction with other medical implants made of titanium or cobalt-chrome alloy whenever "wiring" may help secure the attachment of other implants.
## Device Description:
The purpose of this submission is to expand the indications of the LigaPASS™ system to include the use with a posterior spinal instrumentation construct when ligament augmentation is needed.
The LigaPASS™ 2.0 Ligament Augmentation System provides surgeons the ability to mimic anatomical muscle and ligament functionality and stabilization between vertebrae that are collapsed during surgery before fusion. The LigaPASS™ 2.0 Ligament Augmentation System is designed to restore balance and stability as a complement to a posterior thoracolumbar fixation system. Ergonomic instrumentation provides smooth assembly with self-stabilizing tensioners and torque-limiting locking tools. The LigaPASS™ 2.0 Ligament Augmentation System consists of a polyester (PET) band and titanium alloy medial open connector with 2 set screws.
LigaPASS™ bands allow the surgeon to create a posterior vertebra anchorage without theuse of a pedicle screw or hook. Instead of a pedicle screw or hook, the LigaPASS™ bands are laced around the vertebra independently of the vertebra anatomy and then connected to a LigaPASSTM connector to make the rod-bone connection.
The LigaPASS™ 2.0 bands are comprised of a PET braid and pure titanium (T40) malleable leads at the ends of the bands. The malleable tips help the surgeon to lace the band around the vertebra. They can be bent by the surgeon to make it pass under and through the vertebral body easier.
The LigaPASS™ connectors allow surgeons to attach a rod to a vertebral body without the use of the pedicle. Instead of a pedicle screw, the LigaPASS™ connector use a facet band to make the rod-bone connection. The connectors are comprised of a connector body, a rod set screw, a locking set screw for the band and a polyester band. The body of these connectors is manufactured from titanium allov (Ti-6Al-4V). The part is compatible with any rods made of titanium or cobalt chromium alloys between diameters 5.5 mm and 6.0 mm.
## Predicate Device:
Medicrea submits the following information in this Premarket Notification to demonstrate that, for the purposes of FDA's regulation of medical devices, the LigaPASS™ 2.0 Ligament Augmentation System is substantially equivalent in indications, design principles, and performance to the following predicate devices, which have been determined by FDA to be substantially equivalent to pre-amendment devices:
Primary Predicate: LigaPASS™ 2.0 Band and Dual Band (K173506)
{5}------------------------------------------------
Additional Predicate: LigaPASS™ 2.0 Medial and Medial Open Connector (K172021), Pass LP (K112736)
## Performance Testing Summary:
No additional bench or animal testing was completed for the purpose of this 510(k) submission. The non-clinical performance of the LigaPASS™ 2.0 Medial System has been validated through a series of 510(k) submissions (K172021, K173506).
Clinical data published in the literature were provided to support the use of ligament augmentation with the LigaPASS™ system in adult spinal deformity surgery. 1
## Substantial Equivalence:
The subject device was demonstrated to be substantially equivalent to the predicates cited above with respect to indications, design, materials, function, manufacturing, and performance.
| Device | Medicrea<br>International<br>LigaPASS™ 2.0<br>Ligament<br>Augmentation<br>System | Medicrea<br>International<br>LigaPASS™ 2.0<br>Medial/Medial<br>Open Connector | Medicrea<br>International<br>LigaPASS™ 2.0<br>Band/Dual Band |
|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) Number | K213659<br>(Subject) | K172021 | K173506 |
| Intended Use | | | |
| Thoracic | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Lumber | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Materials | - Titanium Alloy<br>(Ti-6Al-4V)<br>according to<br>ASTM F136 &<br>ISO 5832-3<br>- Polyethylene<br>Terephthalate<br>(PET) | - Titanium Alloy<br>(Ti-6Al-4V)<br>according to<br>ASTM F136 &<br>ISO 5832-3<br>- Polyethylene<br>Terephthalate<br>(PET) | - Polyethylene<br>Terephthalate<br>(PET) |
<sup>1</sup> Safaee, M.M., et al., Ligament augmentation for prevention of proximal junctional kyphosis and proximal junctional failure in adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine, 2018. 28(5): p. 512-519.
{6}------------------------------------------------
## Conclusion:
The subject device and the predicate devices have intended use, technological characteristics, materials, and performance. Therefore, the subject device is substantially equivalent to the cited predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.