K213554 · Sentient Manufacturing , LLC · GEX · Feb 2, 2022 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K213554
Device Name
Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fiber
Applicant
Sentient Manufacturing , LLC
Product Code
GEX · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Feb 2, 2022
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4810
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fiber System is intended to deliver the laser radiation to the target tissue when used with any cleared/certified surgical laser with operational wavelength between 500nm - 2200nm equipped with SMA 905 or SMA 906 or compatible connector, as per the indications of the laser device used with.
Device Story
Fiber optic delivery system for surgical lasers; transmits laser energy from external laser source to target soft tissue. Consists of silica core, cladding, and polyimide/ETFE buffer; includes SMA-905/906 connectors. Used in clinical settings by physicians; connects to cleared surgical lasers (500-2200nm). Distal end configurations include bare fiber for contact or non-contact procedures. Facilitates laser surgery by guiding energy to tissue; enables various surgical applications depending on the host laser system. Includes accessories: fiber stripper, cleaver, cannula, handpiece. Reusable up to 10 times via autoclave sterilization.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance compared to predicate (K200234) using Deka Smartlipo 18W Nd:YAG laser. Metrics included power output stability (10 data points over 30-minute mock treatments), tensile strength (maximum bend radius), beam profile consistency (1,064 nm IR camera analysis), and durability (12-hour heat testing at 150°C and 20 autoclave cycles). Results showed nearly identical performance to the predicate.
Technological Characteristics
Fiber optic delivery system; silica core, silica cladding, polyimide (ETFE) buffer. SMA-905/906 connectors. Lengths 3-5m; core diameters 200, 400, 605, 800, 1000 microns. Passive device; no energy source. Reusable (up to 10x); sterilization via autoclave.
Indications for Use
Indicated for delivery of laser radiation to soft tissue in general, plastic surgery, and dermatology procedures when used with compatible surgical lasers (500nm-2200nm).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
(1) A carbon dioxide laser for use in general surgery and in dermatology is a laser device intended to cut, destroy, or remove tissue by light energy emitted by carbon dioxide.(2) An argon laser for use in dermatology is a laser device intended to destroy or coagulate tissue by light energy emitted by argon.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logos of the Department of Health & Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, and the FDA logo is on the right. The FDA logo includes the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
February 2, 2022
Sentient Manufacturing LLC % Kevin Morningstar Senior Consultant Morningstar Consulting Group LLC 20319 E Costilla Ave Centennial, Colorado 80016
Re: K213554
Trade/Device Name: Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fiber System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4810 Regulation Name: Laser surgical instrument for use in general and plastic surgery and in dermatology Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GEX Dated: October 29, 2021 Received: November 8, 2021
Dear Kevin Morningstar:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Purva Pandya Assistant Director DHT4A: Division of General Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K213554
Device Name
Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fiber System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fiber System is intended to deliver the laser radiation to the target tissue when used with any cleared certified surgical laser with operational wavelength between 500nm - 2200nm equipped with SMA 905 or SMA 906 or compatible connector, as per the indications of the laser device used with.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW."
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Sentient Laser Fiber 510(k) Summary
#### I. SUBMITTER:
Jim Mousseau, President/COO Sentient Manufacturing, LLC 4383 N Forestdale Drive Park City, UT 84098, USA i.mousseau@sentientlasers.com
Contact Person: Kevin Morningstar, Regulatory Consultant (510k Preparer and FDA correspondent) Morningstar Consulting Group LLC 20319 E Costilla Ave Centennial. CO 80016 (720) 940-8271 kevin.morningstar@gmail.com
Date Prepared: 26 January 2022
II. DEVICE Name of Device: Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fiber System Common or Usual Name: Laser Fiber Optical Delivery System Classification Name: Powered Laser Surgical Instrument Requlation Number: 21 CFR Part 878.4810 Requlatory Class: Class II Product Code: GEX
III. PREDICATE DEVICE K200234 Quanta System Surgical Laser Fibers This predicate has not been subject to a design-related recall.
#### IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fiber System is a fiber optic delivery device, with the intended use of delivering laser radiation to soft tissue via contact and non-contact procedures, with any compatible laser system.
The Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fibers consist of a fiber optic core, cladding, coating, laser specific compatible connector (proximal end), and optional tip configurations on the distal end (sometimes left bare). The device length can vary from 3 - 5 meters in length with core diameter sizes of 200, 400, 605, 800 and 1000 microns. The device also includes a fiber stripper, fiber cleaver, canula and hand piece to prepare and use the fibers in specific procedures.
The proximal end of the fiber optic is connected to the laser system via SMA-905 or compatible connector type. This connection between the fiber and the laser system allows for the laser radiation to transmit through the fiber core and output at the distal end of the fiber optic. The
{4}------------------------------------------------
fiber connector also keeps the laser centered on the fiber optic surface to ensure proper power transmission throughout the fiber optic.
The fiber optic itself is multilayer; comprised of a core, cladding, and a coating. The fiber cladding and coating provide a protective laver around the core. They also have a low refractive index to keep the power confined inside of the fiber core.
The distal end of the laser fiber can have multiple configurations to fit the needs of the treatment application. The most common configuration of the distal end is primarily a bare fiber, with a polished surface.
## V. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fiber System is intended to deliver the laser radiation to the target tissue when used with any cleared/certified surgical laser with operational wavelength between 500nm - 2200nm equipped with SMA 905 or SMA 906 or compatible connector, as per the indications of the laser device used with.
## VI. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
| | K200234 Quanta System<br>Surgical Laser Fibers<br>(Predicate) | Sentient Manufacturing Laser<br>Fiber<br>(New) | Comparison |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Trade/Proprietary Name | Quanta System Surgical Laser<br>Fibers | Sentient Manufacturing Laser<br>Fiber | Similar |
| Generic/Common Name | Laser Fiber Optical Delivery<br>System | Laser Fiber Optical Delivery<br>System | Identical |
| Classification Name | Powered Laser Surgical<br>Instrument | Powered Laser Surgical<br>Instrument | Identical |
| Regulation Name | Laser surgical instrument for use<br>in general and plastic surgery and<br>in dermatology | Laser surgical instrument for use<br>in general and plastic surgery<br>and in dermatology | Identical |
| Regulatory Class | II | II | Identical |
| Product Code | GEX | GEX | Identical |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR Part 878.4810 | 21 CFR Part 878.4810 | Identical |
| Review Panel | General & Plastic Surgery | General & Plastic Surgery | Identical |
| Indications for use | Surgical Laser fibers are intended<br>to deliver the laser radiation to the<br>target tissue when used<br>with any cleared/certified surgical<br>laser with operational wavelengths<br>between 500nm - 2200nm<br>equipped with SMA 905 or SMA<br>906 or compatible connector, as<br>per the indications of the laser<br>device used with. | The Sentient Manufacturing<br>Laser Fiber is intended to deliver<br>the laser radiation to the target<br>tissue when used with any<br>cleared/certified surgical laser<br>with operational wavelength<br>between 500nm - 2200nm<br>equipped with SMA 905 or SMA<br>906 or compatible connector, as<br>per the indications of the laser<br>device used with. | Identical |
| Operating Wavelength | 500-2200 nm | 500-2200 nm | Identical |
{5}------------------------------------------------
| | K200234 Quanta System<br>Surgical Laser Fibers<br>(Predicate) | Sentient Manufacturing Laser<br>Fiber<br>(New) | Comparison |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Diameter of Core<br>(microns) | 200-1000 | 200, 400, 605, 800, 1000 | Similar |
| Length | 3m or 5m | 3 to 5 m | Identical |
| Connector Type | SMA 905 | SMA 905 | Identical |
| Construction Materials | Standard Silica Core<br>Fluoropolymer or Silica Cladding<br>Acrylate, Teflon, Nylon, or<br>Polyimide Buffer | Standard Silica Core<br>Silica Cladding<br>Polyimide (ETFE) Buffer | Similar |
| Patient Contacting<br>Materials | ETFE or Nylon | Polyimide (ETFE)<br>304 Stainless | Similar |
| Provided Sterile | Yes (EtO) | No | Different |
| Number of Uses | Single Use or Reusable 10x | Single Use or Reusable 10x | Identical |
### VII. PERFORMANCE DATA
The Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fiber has successfully passed our Internal Performance Testing Parameters. Realtime testing was completed by side comparisons of the predicate device listed. The performance is nearly identical with the predicate device.
The Performance testing included power output percentage, long duration power stability, tensile strength testing, beam profile check, and durability tests.
Power stability testing was completed using a Deka Smartlipo 18W Nd:YAG laser, which is a compatible and FDA cleared laser system. Testing was done on the same laser system to ensure stability control. 10 individual power stability tests were done on the Predicate Device (K200234) and the Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fibers to provide a direct data comparison. A Power Fluctuation percentage was calculated. The power stability tests involved performing a mock clinical treatment with the typical duration of 30 minutes. The Smartlipo laser was pulsing at the maximum power of 18 watts and continuously monitored by an external laser energy power meter. A power sample was then taken every 3 minutes to provide 10 data points. After each power stability test, we performed an industry standard sterilization cycle through the autoclave and re-ran the power test 10 times. This was done to mimic the maximum life expectancy of the Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fibers.
Tensile strength testing was performed by analyzing the maximum bend radius of both the Predicate Device (K200234) and the Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fiber . Each fiber had 2 feet of length mounted to a folding bracket and was collapsed until the fiber core broke. Data was collected by looking at degree of bend. We discovered that each device had very similar results in the maximum bend radius due in part to having similar composition of fiber core, cladding, and coating.
The beam profile of both fibers was analyzed using a 1,064 nm Nd:YAG Deka Smartlipo laser. The 1,064 nm laser emits a Near Infrared beam that is focused and fired at the proximal end of the laser fibers. This laser then transmits through the fiber core and emits out of the distal end. The distal end of the fiber was then pointed at a ceramic disk so it could be analyzed using an Infrared camera. Beam consistency and mode of the Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fibers were then visually compared to the predicate device and showed them to be as expected virtually identical.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Durability tests were performed on both the Predicate Device (K200234) and the Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fibers. These tests include heat testing and sterilization durability. Both fibers were placed into the fiber oven for a 12-hour duration at 150 degrees C and inspected for defects. Our sterilization inspection was completed by running each fiber optic assembly through 20 autoclave cycles and inspected for defects of which none of note were detected.
### VIII. CONCLUSION
The non-clinical data support the safety of the device, and design verification and validation demonstrate that the Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fiber System performs as intended in the specified use conditions. The Sentient Manufacturing Laser Fiber System does not raise new types of questions regarding safety or effectiveness and is considered to be substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate device (K200234).
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.