K213061 · Ok Biotech Co., Ltd. · NBW · Oct 7, 2022 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K213061
Device Name
SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System
Applicant
Ok Biotech Co., Ltd.
Product Code
NBW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Oct 7, 2022
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger, forearm, upper arm, calf, thigh, or palm. It is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. The SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System is for self-testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of a diabetes control program. The SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System is not intended for the diagnosis of or diabetes mellitus, nor for use with neonates. Alternative site testing should be done only during steady-state conditions (when blood glucose is not changing rapidly).
Device Story
System measures glucose in capillary whole blood via amperometric technology. User inserts test strip into meter; applies blood drop to strip; meter detects electrical current generated by reaction between glucose and GDH-FAD enzyme on carbon-printed electrodes. Current strength is proportional to glucose concentration. Used at home by patients with diabetes for self-monitoring. Output displayed on meter; data transmitted via Bluetooth to mobile app. Helps patients monitor diabetes control program effectiveness. Includes control solution for system verification.
Clinical Evidence
User evaluation study conducted to confirm system accuracy, operation, and ease of use. Non-clinical testing included electrical/mechanical safety, precision, linearity, interference, and robustness studies. All performance criteria met.
Technological Characteristics
Amperometric glucose test system using GDH-FAD enzyme. Measuring range: 20-600 mg/dL. Sample volume: 0.5 μL. Operating conditions: 10-40°C, 10-85% RH. Hematocrit range: 20-60%. Connectivity: None (standalone). Calibration: Automatic. Sterilization: Not applicable (in vitro diagnostic).
Indications for Use
Indicated for people with diabetes mellitus for quantitative self-testing of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood (finger, forearm, upper arm, calf, thigh, or palm) as an aid in monitoring diabetes control. Not for diagnosis or screening of diabetes; not for use with neonates. Alternative site testing restricted to steady-state conditions.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
WowGoHealth Blood Glucose Monitoring System (k171785)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K213061
B Applicant
OK BioTech Co., Ltd.
C Proprietary and Established Names
SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NBW | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1345 - Glucose Test System | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
New device
B Measurand:
Glucose in capillary whole blood from finger, forearm, upper arm, calf, thigh, or palm
C Type of Test:
Quantitative amperometric measurement of glucose (GDH-FAD)
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
K213061 - Page 2 of 15
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
### A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
### B Indication(s) for Use:
The SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System is comprised of the SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Meter and SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Test Strips. The SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger, forearm, upper arm, calf, thigh, or palm. It is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. The SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System is for self-testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of a diabetes control program. The SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes mellitus, nor for use with neonates. Alternative site testing should be done only during steady-state conditions (when blood glucose is not changing rapidly).
### C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
- OTC - Over The Counter
- The Blood Glucose Monitoring System should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes or for neonatal use.
- For single patient use only. Do not use on multiple patients.
- Use of this device on multiple patients may lead to transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), or other bloodborne pathogens.
- High altitudes above 11,161 ft (3,402 meter) may affect the test results.
- Temperatures outside the range of 50°F to 104°F (10°C to 40°C), humidity range outside 10~85% R.H. may affect the test results. Do not test beyond the temperature/humidity range.
- Do not use alternative site testing when your glucose is changing rapidly.
- Do not use alternative site testing results for CGM calibration or for insulin dose calculations.
- Not for use on critically ill patients, patients in shock, dehydrated patients or hyper-osmolar patients.
- Severe dehydration and excessive water loss may cause false low results. If you believe you are suffering from severe dehydration, consult your healthcare professional immediately.
### D Special Instrument Requirements:
SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Meter
{2}
K213061 - Page 3 of 15
## IV Device/System Characteristics:
### A Device Description:
The SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System consists of:
- SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Meter
- SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Test Strips
- OKmeter Control Solution (Levels I and II)
OKmeter Control Solutions and SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Test Strips can be purchased separately.
### B Principle of Operation:
The SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System (Model OK-2MJB) quantitatively measures the amount of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the fingertip and alternative sites including the palm, forearm, upper arm, calf, and thigh. Blood is applied to the end tip of the test strip, and is then automatically pulled into the reaction cell through capillary action. The enzyme consisting of glucose dehydrogenase with its cofactor flavin adenine dinucleotide (GDH-FAD) and mediator deposited onto the reaction area of the test strip reacts with the glucose in the blood sample to produce an electric current, which is proportional to the amount of glucose in the sample. The meter measures the strength of the current and displays the corresponding blood glucose concentration. The meter provides plasma-equivalent results.
### C Instrument Description Information:
1. Instrument Name:
SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Meter
2. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
3. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
Samples are to be tested immediately upon collection.
4. Calibration:
The meter does not require calibration or coding by the user. The meter is automatically coded.
{3}
K213061 - Page 4 of 15
5. Quality Control:
The sponsor manufactures 2 levels of OKmeter Control Solutions (Levels I and II). Each test strip vial is marked with a control solution range. The labeling includes instructions to use the C key when conducting control solution testing to prevent the results from being included in the blood result averages. The user is instructed in the labeling to compare the control results with the expected control ranges printed on the strip vial. Users are given instructions on when to conduct control solution testing and to call customer service if repeat testing with control material is out of range.
This medical device product has functions subject to FDA premarket review as well as functions that are not subject to FDA premarket review. For this application, if the product has functions that are not subject to FDA premarket review, FDA assessed those functions only to the extent that they either could adversely impact the safety and effectiveness of the functions subject to FDA premarket review or they are included as a labeled positive impact that was considered in the assessment of the functions subject to FDA premarket review.
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
WowGoHealth Blood Glucose Monitoring System
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K171785
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K213061 | K171785 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System | WowGoHealth Blood Glucose Monitoring System |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | For the quantitative measurement of glucose in capillary whole blood by people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of a diabetes control program. | Same |
| Assay method | Electrochemical | Same |
| Detection method | Amperometry | Same |
| Enzyme | Flavin adenine dinucleotide-Glucose dehydrogenase | Same |
{4}
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP05-A3 Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline - Third Edition
- CLSI EP07 Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry - Third Edition.
- ISO 14971 Third Edition Medical Devices - Application of Risk Management to Medical Devices
- ANSI/AAMI ES60601-1:2005/(R)2012 and A1:2012,Cl:2009/(R)2012 and A2:2010/(R)2012- Medical electrical equipment -Part 1: General requirements for safety and essential performance
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A. Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Within-run precision:
The sponsor performed a within-run precision (repeatability) study using venous whole blood samples at 5 glucose levels (30-50, 51-110, 111-150, 151-250, 251-600 mg/dL). Each sample was tested 10 times on each of 10 meters using 3 lots of test strips for a total of 300 tests per glucose concentration. Results are summarized below:
| Target Glucose Ranges, mg/dL | Lot | N | Mean, mg/dL | SD, mg/dL | CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30 to 50 | 1 | 100 | 39.9 | 1.5 | 3.7% |
| | 2 | 100 | 40 | 1.4 | 3.6% |
| | 3 | 100 | 39.9 | 1.4 | 3.5% |
| | Pooled | 300 | 39.9 | 1.4 | 3.6% |
| 51 to 110 | 1 | 100 | 80 | 2.6 | 3.3% |
| | 2 | 100 | 80 | 2.4 | 3.0% |
| | 3 | 100 | 80 | 2.5 | 3.2% |
K213061 - Page 5 of 15
{5}
K213061 - Page 6 of 15
| Target Glucose Ranges, mg/dL | Lot | N | Mean, mg/dL | SD, mg/dL | CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Pooled | 300 | 80 | 2.5 | 3.2% |
| 111 to 150 | 1 | 100 | 131.2 | 4.3 | 3.3% |
| | 2 | 100 | 130.4 | 4.1 | 3.1% |
| | 3 | 100 | 131.3 | 4.5 | 3.4% |
| | Pooled | 300 | 130.9 | 4.3 | 3.3% |
| 151 to 250 | 1 | 100 | 201.5 | 5.8 | 2.9% |
| | 2 | 100 | 201.6 | 6.6 | 3.3% |
| | 3 | 100 | 202.3 | 6.4 | 3.2% |
| | Pooled | 300 | 201.8 | 6.3 | 3.1% |
| 251 to 600 | 1 | 100 | 308.7 | 9.9 | 3.2% |
| | 2 | 100 | 309.3 | 9.6 | 3.1% |
| | 3 | 100 | 308.7 | 9.6 | 3.1% |
| | Pooled | 300 | 308.9 | 9.7 | 3.1% |
## Intermediate Precision:
Intermediate precision was evaluated for 10 days using 5 levels of control solutions, 3 test strip lots, and 10 meters. Each sample level was measured once a day with each meter and each test strip lot for 10 days, for a total of 300 replicates per level. Results are summarized below:
| Control Solution Level | Lot | N | Mean, mg/dL | SD, mg/dL | CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Level 1 | 1 | 100 | 45.1 | 1.2 | 2.6% |
| | 2 | 100 | 44.8 | 1.1 | 2.6% |
| | 3 | 100 | 45.2 | 1.3 | 2.9% |
| | Pooled | 300 | 45 | 1.2 | 2.7% |
| Level 2 | 1 | 100 | 80.2 | 2.6 | 3.3% |
| | 2 | 100 | 80.5 | 2.4 | 3.0% |
| | 3 | 100 | 80.4 | 2.6 | 3.2% |
| | Pooled | 300 | 80.3 | 2.6 | 3.2% |
| Level 3 | 1 | 100 | 129.8 | 3.7 | 2.8% |
| | 2 | 100 | 129.8 | 4 | 3.1% |
| | 3 | 100 | 131 | 4 | 3.0% |
| | Pooled | 300 | 130.2 | 3.9 | 3.0% |
| Level 4 | 1 | 100 | 201.1 | 5.7 | 2.8% |
| | 2 | 100 | 199.6 | 5.5 | 2.8% |
| | 3 | 100 | 198.9 | 5.9 | 3.0% |
| | Pooled | 300 | 199.9 | 5.8 | 2.9% |
| Level 5 | 1 | 100 | 324.2 | 9.9 | 3.0% |
| | 2 | 100 | 323.9 | 9.4 | 2.9% |
| | 3 | 100 | 325.2 | 9 | 2.8% |
| | Pooled | 300 | 324.4 | 9.4 | 2.9% |
{6}
K213061 - Page 7 of 15
2. Linearity:
The claimed measuring range of the candidate device is 20-600 mg/dL. Linearity was evaluated using 3 lots of test strips, 10 meters, and 11 venous whole blood samples with the following mean glucose concentrations when measured on the YSI 2300 comparator method: 19.8, 50.2, 90.0, 121.3, 149.3, 250.3, 351.5, 450.3, 548.8, 600.3, and 701.0 mg/dL. Blood glucose concentration values obtained on the SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System were compared to those obtained using the YSI 2300 comparator method. The results of linear regression analysis are summarized below:
Lot 1: y = 1.0055x - 1.4364; R² = 0.9995
Lot 2: y = 0.9992x + 0.0577; R² = 0.9999
Lot 3: y = 0.9993x + 1.3448; R² = 0.9998
The results of the study support the sponsor's claimed glucose measurement range of 20-600 mg/dL.
If a glucose result is less than 20 mg/dL, "LO" is displayed on the meter. If a glucose result is more than 600 mg/dL, "HI" is displayed on the meter. The "LO" and "HI" functions were validated and demonstrated to function as intended.
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
To assess potential interference from endogenous and exogenous substances on glucose measurements from the SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System, a study was conducted using venous whole blood samples adjusted to the following glucose levels as measured by the YSI 2300 comparator method: 51-70, 111-130, and 225-270 mg/dL. Each of these samples was divided into a test pool and a control pool, with each of the potential endogenous and exogenous interfering substances added to the test pool. Four (4) levels of each of the potentially interfering substances were prepared and tested using 3 lots of test strips and 10 meters, for a total of 30 replicates per test sample. Control samples were tested using 3 lots of test strips and 10 meters for a total of 30 replicates per control sample. The differences in meter results between the test sample and the control sample were calculated. The table below summarizes the results. At the following concentrations, the difference between the test samples and control samples was ≤ ±10%.
| Potential Interfering Substance | Highest Concentration Without Significant Interference, mg/dL |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 8 |
| Ascorbic acid(Vitamin C) | 5 |
| Conjugated Bilirubin | 90 |
| Unconjugated Bilirubin | 90 |
| Cholesterol | 500 |
| Creatinine | 30 |
| Dopamine | 2 |
| EDTA | 360 |
| Galactose | 900 |
| Gentisic acid | 5 |
{7}
| Potential Interfering Substance | Highest Concentration Without Significant Interference, mg/dL |
| --- | --- |
| Glutathione | 53 |
| Hemoglobin | 20,000 |
| Heparin, IU/dL | 8,000 |
| Ibuprofen | 50 |
| Icodextrin | 2,000 |
| L-DOPA | 10 |
| Maltose | 1,000 |
| Methyl-DOPA | 3 |
| Salicylate | 60 |
| Sodium | 460 |
| Tolazamide | 100 |
| Tolbutamide | 400 |
| Triglycerides | 2,000 |
| Urate (uric acid) | 10 |
| Xylose | 100 |
| Mannitol | 5,000 |
| Sorbitol | 1,000 |
| Xylitol | 1,000 |
| Lactitol | 1,000 |
| Isomalt | 1,000 |
| Maltitol | 1,000 |
The sponsor lists the following limitations in the SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System User Guide and the SuperCheck Pro Test Strip Insert:
- Do not use this device while taking acetaminophen or acetaminophen containing drugs (such as certain cold and flu remedies or certain prescription drugs, when acetaminophen in your blood >8 mg/dL). You may receive incorrect results if you have recently taken any acetaminophen.
- If you are taking a high level of vitamin C (ascorbic acid level in your blood > 5 mg/dL), your blood glucose results may not be reliable. If you are unsure, ask your doctor.
- If you have a disease or condition that elevates your blood uric acid level (Uric acid level in your blood > 10 mg/dL) such as gout, your blood glucose results may not be accurate with the system. If you are unsure, ask your doctor.
- Do not test blood glucose during or soon after a xylose absorption test. Xylose in the blood can give falsely elevated results.
4. Assay Reportable Range:
20 – 600 mg/dL glucose
K213061 - Page 8 of 15
{8}
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
**Traceability:**
The system is traceable to NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) standard reference material NIST SRM #917c. A method comparison was performed using the candidate device and a YSI 2300 comparator method. The meter provides plasma-equivalent results.
**Test Strip Stability:**
Test strip (vials and individually wrapped pouches of strips) stability was assessed using real time stability studies. Protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found acceptable to support the labeling claims that vialed test strips are stable for 180 days after first being opened, and that closed vials and individually wrapped pouches are stable for 30 months when stored between 39.2°F to 104°F (4°C-40°C) and 10-85% relative humidity.
6. Detection Limit:
Please refer to the linearity study above.
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
8. Accuracy (Instrument):
Not applicable.
9. Carry-Over:
Not applicable.
B. Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
See lay-user performance study below.
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable.
C. Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
K213061 - Page 9 of 15
{9}
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable.
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
## Lay-user Performance study:
A lay user performance study was conducted with a total of 350 participants to assess the performance of the SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System. The participants were responsible for obtaining their own capillary sample and performing a blood glucose test using only the instructions from the product labeling in English. Results were analyzed by comparing blood glucose results from capillary whole blood on the SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System obtained by the lay user against results obtained on the YSI 2300 comparator method. The glucose concentrations of the samples ranged from 43.3 to 456 mg/dL, which included 15 native samples with glucose levels < 80 mg/dL and 50 samples with glucose levels > 250 mg/dL, as measured by the YSI 2300 comparator method. The results are summarized in the tables below:
## Fingertip vs. Plasma YSI
For all glucose concentrations
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% | Within ± 20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 236/350 (67.4%) | 328/350 (93.7%) | 348/350 (99.4%) | 350/350 (100%) |
For glucose concentrations <75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12/13(92.3%) | 13/13(100%) | 13/13(100%) | 13/13(100%) |
For glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 224/337(66.5%) | 313/337(92.9%) | 335/337(99.4%) | 337/337(100%) |
## Palm vs. Plasma YSI
For all glucose concentrations
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% | Within ± 20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 236/350 (67.4%) | 323/350 (92.3%) | 347/350 (99.1%) | 350/350 (100%) |
For glucose concentrations <75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7/13(53.8%) | 11/13(84.6%) | 13/13(100%) | 13/13(100%) |
For glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 229/337(68%) | 312/337(92.6%) | 334/337(99.1%) | 337/337(100%) |
K213061 - Page 10 of 15
{10}
Forearm vs. Plasma YSI
For all glucose concentrations
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% | Within ± 20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 239/350 (68.3%) | 330/350 (94.3%) | 349/350 (99.7%) | 350/350 (100%) |
For glucose concentrations <75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8/13(61.5%) | 13/13(100%) | 13/13(100%) | 13/13(100%) |
For glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 231/337(68.5%) | 317/337(94.1%) | 336/337(99.7%) | 337/337(100%) |
Upper arm vs. Plasma YSI
For all glucose concentrations
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% | Within ± 20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 220/350 (62.9%) | 320/350 (91.4%) | 348/350 (99.4%) | 350/350 (100%) |
For glucose concentrations <75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 9/13(69.2%) | 11/13(84.6%) | 13/13(100%) | 13/13(100%) |
For glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 211/337(62.6%) | 309/337(91.7%) | 335/337(99.4%) | 337/337(100%) |
Calf vs. Plasma YSI
For all glucose concentrations
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% | Within ± 20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 217/350 (62%) | 328/350 (93.7%) | 347/350 (99.1%) | 350/350 (100%) |
For glucose concentrations <75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8/13(61.5%) | 12/13(92.3%) | 13/13(100%) | 13/13(100%) |
For glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 209/337(62%) | 316/337(93.8%) | 334/337(99.1%) | 337/337(100%) |
K213061 - Page 11 of 15
{11}
Thigh vs. Plasma YSI
For all glucose concentrations
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% | Within ± 20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 221/350 (63.1%) | 325/350 (92.9%) | 349/350 (99.7%) | 350/350 (100%) |
For glucose concentrations <75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8/13(61.5%) | 13/13(100%) | 13/13(100%) | 13/13(100%) |
For glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 215/337(63.8%) | 312/337(92.6%) | 336/337(99.7%) | 337/337(100%) |
## Accuracy at Extreme Glucose Study:
An accuracy study was performed to evaluate the performance of the SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System in the extreme lower and upper ends of the claimed glucose measuring range using capillary whole blood samples from 10 volunteers. Each of the ten volunteer capillary whole blood samples was used to prepare 10 samples for a total of 100 samples. Fifty (50) samples were altered by glycolysis to achieve glucose concentrations below 80 mg/dL and the other 50 samples were spiked to achieve glucose concentrations greater than 250 mg/dL. The 100 samples were tested using 3 test strip lots, and the glucose results using the candidate device compared to results obtained on the YSI 2300 analyzer are summarized below:
Extreme glucose study results for glucose concentrations < 80 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 24/50(48%) | 42/50(84%) | 49/50(98%) | 50/50(100%) |
Extreme glucose study results for glucose concentrations > 250 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 31/50(62%) | 49/50(98%) | 50/50(100%) | 50/50(100%) |
## Usability:
At the end of the lay user performance study, each participant was asked to complete a usability questionnaire regarding ease of understanding of information in the user manual and the ease of use when performing a blood glucose test with the SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System. From the sponsor's analysis of the questionnaire responses, the participants were satisfied with the ease of operation following the instructions for use in the labeling and with their overall ability to conduct testing with the candidate device.
## Readability:
A Flesch-Kincaid readability assessment was conducted on the user manual and the test strip insert and demonstrated that the overall readability was at an 8th grade level or lower.
K213061 - Page 12 of 15
{12}
D. Clinical Cut-Off:
Not Applicable.
E. Expected Values/Reference Range:
The following statements regarding expected glucose values for people without diabetes are included in the device labeling:
"The fasting blood glucose range for a nondiabetic person is less than 100 mg/dL and less than 140 mg/dL up to 2 hours after meals. These are expected values for people without diabetes. Users should cooperate with their healthcare professional to determine their target blood glucose values."
Reference: Diabetes Care 2020;43 (Suppl. 1): S14-S31, American Diabetes Association.
F. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data:
1. Hematocrit:
To evaluate the effect of hematocrit on the SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System, venous blood samples were adjusted to hematocrit levels of 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 42%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%. Each sample was then adjusted to achieve 5 glucose concentrations within the following ranges (30-50, 51-110, 111-150, 151-250, and 251-400 mg/dL). Each blood sample at each condition was tested using 10 SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Meters using 3 lots of test strips, and was also tested on the YSI 2300 comparator method. The values for each level of glucose were compared to results using the YSI 2300 comparator method, and to the normal hematocrit sample. The results support the claimed hematocrit range of 20%-60% for the SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System.
2. Sample Volume:
A minimum sample volume study was performed to verify the minimum test strip sample volume requirement and the test strip fill error function established for the candidate device. Three lots of test strips on 10 meters were tested using venous blood samples at 3 concentrations (50-65, 100-120, and 200-250 mg/dL) at each condition. Blood at each concentration was applied to strips at 4 target sample volumes of 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 μL. The study results supported the minimum sample volume claim of 0.5 μL for the system. The meter either displays an error message or does not start the test if not enough blood is added to the test strip. This feature was validated and was shown to function as intended.
3. Altitude Study:
To evaluate the effect of altitude on the SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System, meters were tested in mountains at elevations of 298, 4,790, and 11,161 feet above sea level using whole venous blood samples adjusted to 5 concentration levels of glucose ranging from 30-400 mg/dL. At each elevation, each glucose sample was tested using 10 meters and 3 lots of test strips for a total 30 replicates. The results obtained on the candidate device were
K213061 - Page 13 of 15
{13}
compared with the results obtained with the YSI 2300 comparator method. The results support the claim that glucose measurement performance of the SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System is maintained at altitudes up to 11,161 feet (3,402 meters).
## 4. Operating Conditions:
The effect of temperature and relative humidity on the SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System was evaluated using venous whole blood samples adjusted to approximately 3 glucose concentration ranges: 30-50, 111-150, and 251-400 mg/dL. Testing was conducted under the following temperature and relative humidity (RH) combinations: 46.4°F (8°C) at 5% and 90% RH; 50°F (10°C) at 10% and 85% RH; 104°F (40°C) at 10% and 85% RH; 107.6°F (42°C) at 5 and 90% RH; 23°C at 50% RH. Each glucose concentration at each condition was tested using 10 meters and 3 lots of test strips for a total of 30 replicates. Values were compared to results from the YSI 2300 comparator method. The study results support the operating conditions claim of 50-104°F (10-40°C) with relative humidity of 10% to 85%.
## 5. Infection Control Studies:
The SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for single-patient use only. Disinfection efficacy studies were performed on the external meter materials by an outside commercial testing laboratory to demonstrate complete inactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) with the chosen disinfectant, the PDI Super Sani-Cloth Germicidal Disposable Wipe (EPA Reg. No. 9480-4).
Robustness studies were also performed by the sponsor to demonstrate that there was no change in performance or change in the external materials of the meter after 520 cleaning and disinfection cycles with the PDI Super Sani-Cloth Germicidal Disposable Wipes. The robustness studies were designed to simulate single-patient use with cleaning and disinfection twice per week for five years.
Labeling was reviewed for adequate instructions for the validated cleaning and disinfection procedures.
## 6. Flex Studies:
Flex studies were performed demonstrating that the SuperCheck Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System is robust to sample perturbation, testing with used test strips, intermittent sampling, testing outside of the specified operation condition range, shipping, drop and vibration.
## 7. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Testing:
The sponsor provided documentation certifying that acceptable electrical safety and EMC testing had been performed and the system was found to be compliant.
## 8. Test Strip Lot Release
The test strip lot release protocols and criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable.
K213061 - Page 14 of 15
{14}
VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K213061 - Page 15 of 15
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.