K213033 · Orthosoft D/B/A Zimmer Cas · OLO · Jan 14, 2022 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K213033
Device Name
iASSIST Knee System
Applicant
Orthosoft D/B/A Zimmer Cas
Product Code
OLO · Neurology
Decision Date
Jan 14, 2022
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.4560
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The iASSIST Knee System is a computer assisted stereotaxic surgical instrument system intended to assist the surgeon in preparing the bone surfaces for the positioning of orthopedic implants intra-operatively. It involves surgical instruments and inertial sensors to determine alignment axes in relation to anatomical landmarks and to precisely position alignment instruments and cut guides relative to these axes. The present iASSIST Knee System is designed for Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Device Story
iASSIST Knee System is a computer-assisted stereotaxic surgical instrument system for Total Knee Arthroplasty. System components include inertial sensor 'Pods', surgical instruments, and a tablet computer. During surgery, the surgeon attaches Pods to the patient's bones; the system uses inertial sensors to track anatomical landmarks and determine alignment axes. The tablet computer and software control the Pods via wireless communication, guiding the surgeon in positioning alignment instruments and cut guides. The system provides real-time spatial orientation and navigation to assist in the precise placement of knee replacement components. The surgeon uses the output to adjust saw guides, ensuring accurate bone resection and implant alignment. The device is used in the operating room by orthopedic surgeons to improve the accuracy of implant positioning, potentially leading to better clinical outcomes for patients.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Evidence consists of nonclinical bench testing, including physical/performance testing, engineering analysis, usability engineering, and validation lab testing using cadaveric specimens to simulate full clinical use. Software verification and validation were conducted per IEC 62304 standards.
Technological Characteristics
System comprises inertial sensor Pods, surgical instruments, and an iASSIST V2 Tablet. Operates via wireless communication between sensors and the tablet. Software controls sequencing and user interface. Navigation is based on inertial sensing of anatomical landmarks to define spatial boundaries for bone resection. Software is classified as moderate level of concern.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty requiring assistance in preparing bone surfaces and positioning orthopedic implants via stereotaxic navigation.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health and Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is in blue and includes the letters "FDA" followed by the words "U.S. Food & Drug Administration".
January 14, 2022
Orthosoft d/b/a Zimmer CAS Paul Hardy Regulatory Affairs Associate Director 75 Queen Street, Suite 3300 Montreal, Quebec H3C 2N6 Canada
Re: K213033
Trade/Device Name: iASSIST Knee System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4560 Regulation Name: Stereotaxic Instrument Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OLO Dated: September 20, 2021 Received: September 21, 2021
Dear Paul Hardy:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Shumaya Ali, M.P.H. Assistant Director DHT6C: Division of Restorative, Repair and Trauma Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K213033
Device Name iASSIST® Knee System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The iASSIST Knee System is a computer assisted stereotaxic surgical instrument system intended to assist the surgeon in preparing the bone surfaces for the positioning of orthopedic implants intra-operatively. It involves surgical instruments and inertial sensors to determine alignment axes in relation to anatomical landmarks and to precisely position alignment instruments and cut guides relative to these axes.
The present iASSIST Knee System is designed for Total Knee Arthroplasty.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| × Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
### 510(k) Summary
In accordance with 21 CFR \$807.92 and the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, the following information is provided for the iASSIST® Knee System 510(k) premarket notification. The submission was prepared in accordance with the FDA guidance document, 'Format for Traditional and Abbreviated 510(k)s', issued on September 13, 2019.
| Sponsor: | Orthosoft, Inc d/b/a. Zimmer CAS | |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------|--|
| | 75 Queen St., Suite 3300 | |
| | Montreal, QC, CANADA H3C 2N6 | |
| | Establishment Registration Number: 9617840 | |
| Contact Person: | Paul Hardy | |
| | Regulatory Affairs Associate Director | |
| | Telephone: 574-453-6739 | |
| | Paul.Hardy@zimmerbiomet.com | |
| Date: | January 5, 2022 | |
| Subject Device: | Trade Name: iASSIST® Knee System | |
| | Common Name: iASSIST® Knee System | |
| | Classification Name: | |
| | • OLO- Orthopedic Stereotaxic Instrument (21 CFR | |
- 882.4560)
# Primary Predicate Device:
| Manufacturer | Device Name | 510(k)<br>Number |
|--------------|---------------------|------------------|
| Zimmer CAS | iASSIST Knee System | K192080 |
# Reference Devices:
| Manufacturer | Device Name | 510(k)<br>Number |
|--------------|------------------------|------------------|
| Zimmer CAS | iASSIST Knee System | K141601 |
| Zimmer CAS | SmartTools Knee System | K122326 |
# Purpose and Device Description:
As in the predicates, the iASSIST Knee System consists of Pods (tracking sensors), a computer system, software, and surgical instruments designed to assist the surgeon in the placement of Total Knee Replacement components. The Pods combined with the surgical instruments provide positional information to help orient and locate the main femoral and tibial cutting planes as required in knee replacement surgery. This includes means for the surgeon to determine and thereafter track each of the bones' alignment axes relative to
{4}------------------------------------------------
which the cutting planes are set. The computer system and software components control and sequence the functions of the Pods per the applicable knee surgery steps via wireless communication.
#### Indications for Use:
The iASSIST Knee System is a computer assisted stereotaxic surgical instrument system intended to assist the surgeon in preparing the bone surfaces for the positioning of orthopedic implant system components intra-operatively. It involves surgical instruments and inertial sensors to determine alignment axes in relation to anatomical landmarks and to precisely position alignment instruments and cut guides relative to these axes.
The present iASSIST Knee System is designed for Total Knee Arthroplasty.
#### Summary of Technological Characteristics:
The rationale for substantial equivalence is based on consideration of the following characteristics:
- The subject and predicate devices are intended to assist the surgeon in ● providing software defined spatial boundaries for orientation
- The subject and predicate devices assist in intraoperative navigation of the patient's anatomy and are utilized to facilitate implant positioning.
- . The subject and predicate device consists of the same major components including Pods, Surgical Instruments, iASSIST V2 Tablet and software components.
- The software and iASSIST V2 Tablet of the subject and predicate devices are intended to sequence and to control the Pods and their user interface functions via wireless communication.
- The software algorithm and instrument features of the subject and ● predicate devices are intended to determine and track the alignment axes to reference the cutting planes.
- The instrument features and functions of the subject and predicate devices are intended to allow assembly of the sensors, to attach the subject bones, to register or digitize the applicable landmarks, and to adjust the alignment of provided saw guides.
#### Summary of Performance Data (Nonclinical and/or Clinical):
The iASSIST® Knee System has been evaluated through the following nonclinical testing in support of the substantial equivalence determination:
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### Device Performance Testing:
Verification and Validation Testing for iASSIST Knee System was conducted with the following aspects:
- Physical/Performance Tests- to ensure the performance of the implemented features and verify related design inputs
- Engineering Analysis- to ensure the performance of the implemented ● features and verify related design inputs
- Usability Engineering- addressed user interactions with the iASSIST Knee System
- . Validation Lab- performed to validate that using the iASSIST Knee System is safe and effective and that the performances of the iASSIST Knee System are acceptable under full simulated use on cadaveric specimens
# Software Verification and Validation Testing:
Software tests were conducted to satisfy the requirements of the FDA Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices and IEC 62304 (Medical Device Software- Life Cycle Process). The software is considered a "moderate" level of concern, a malfunction in the device could lead to a minor injury. The testing demonstrates that the iASSIST Knee System does not raise any new issues of safety and effectiveness as compared to the predicate devices.
# Substantial Equivalence Conclusion:
In summary, the subject and predicate devices have similar indications for use, the same intended use, the same principle of operation as well as similar technological characteristics. Furthermore, the information provided herein demonstrates that:
- Any differences do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness;
- Verification and Validation activities demonstrate that the subject device ● is at least as safe and effective as the legally marketed predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.