The Clear Aligners indicated for use in the alignment of permanent teeth (i.e. all second molars) through orthodontic treatment of misalignment and malocclusion.
Device Story
Intraoral thermoformed plastic aligners; used for orthodontic tooth movement. Input: patient dental data via oral scan or physical impression. Process: digital CAD/CAM treatment planning using 3Shape software; 3D printing of sequential molds; thermoforming plastic sheets over molds. Output: series of sequential aligners. Usage: worn 22 hours/day; removed for eating/cleaning; prescribed by dental practitioner. Mechanism: gentle continuous force applied to teeth to achieve progressive realignment toward final desired position. Benefit: correction of malocclusion.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Manufacturing validation performed using 3rd party software and digital calipers to measure digital models, 3D printed molds, and thermoformed aligners; all measurements within 0.3mm tolerance. Biocompatibility testing (cytotoxicity, irritation, sensitization) performed per ISO 10993-1.
Technological Characteristics
Thermoformed plastic aligners; intraoral; non-sterile. Fabrication: 3D printing of molds from digital CAD/CAM models. Software: 3Shape CAD/CAM. Biocompatible materials. Surface contacting >30 days.
Indications for Use
Indicated for alignment of permanent teeth (including second molars) in patients requiring orthodontic treatment for misalignment and malocclusion.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An orthodontic plastic bracket is a plastic device intended to be bonded to a tooth to apply pressure to a tooth from a flexible orthodontic wire to alter its position.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is in blue and includes the letters "FDA" followed by the words "U.S. Food & Drug Administration".
Shenzhen Meiming Dentistry Technology Co., Ltd Fei Hu Manager Floor 3, Buliding D. Fuxinlin Industrial Park, Mati Pond, Gushu Community, Xixiang Street, Baoan Dis Shenzhen, Guangdong 518102 China
Re: K213026
Trade/Device Name: Clear Aligner Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.5470 Regulation Name: Orthodontic Plastic Bracket Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NXC Dated: July 7, 2022 Received: July 18, 2022
Dear Fei Hu:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
August 16, 2022
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
For Michael E. Adjodha, M. ChE. Assistant Director DHT1B: Division of Dental and ENT Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K213026
Device Name Clear Aligner
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Clear Aligners indicated for use in the alignment of permanent teeth (i.e. all second molars) through orthodontic treatment of misalignment and malocclusion.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
_ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.qov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(K) Summary
510(k) number: K213026 Date of Summary Preparation: August 15, 2022
#### Applicant
Name: Shenzhen Meiming Dentistry Technology Co., Ltd Address: Floor 3, Building D, Fuxinlin industrial park, Mati pond, Gushu community, Xixiang street, Baoan district, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China Official Contact Person Information Name: Fei Hu Tel: 0086- 13219006323 Mail: shenzhenmeiming@gmail.com
#### Device
| Trade name: | Clear Aligner |
|-------------|---------------|
|-------------|---------------|
| Common name: | Aligner, Sequential |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------|
| Classification name: | Aligner, Sequential |
| Regulation Medical Specialty Dental | |
| Regulation Number | 872.5470 |
| Product Code | NXC |
| Classification | Class II |
### Predicate device
510 (K) Number: K201450 Straight T Clear Dental Aligner Produced by Straight T, Inc.
### Indication for use:
The Clear Aligners indicated for use in the alignment teeth (i.e. all second molars) through orthodontic treatment of misalignment and malocclusion.
#### Device Description
The Clear Aligners are intraoral thermoformed plastic aligners that are worn 22 hours per day and are designed to be used in a sequence, each aligner providing a gentle continuous force, to allow for the movement of teeth to the final desired position. The aligners are to be removed for eating and for cleaning.
The Clear Aligners are fabricated using a three-step process.
The first step is to obtain the dimensions and details of the patient's baseline dentition. This is
{4}------------------------------------------------
generally done using an oral scan data or a physical impression. This scanned data (digital CAD/CAM models or patient models) are imported into specialized dental software for treatment planning.
The second step is the printing of 3D models of the treatment plan for use in step 3 (thermoforming). In the second step, the doctor utilizes a software application to plan the treatment by creating a series of sequential models that gradually position the their final desired position. A 3D printer is used to create the molds needed for each treatment step to provide the surface around which the aligner is thermoformed.
The final step is the thermoforming of a plastic sheet material to each of the sequential treatment steps. This process is done using a standard thermoforming equipment and the appropriate material as outlined in this submission.
#### Software Description
Specialized orthodontic CAD/CAM software will be used to develop the treatment plans and to produce standard 3D printer files that will facilitate the manufacturing of each sequential aligner in the treatment plan. The software application used for the manufacturing validation in this submission is the 3Shape®.
#### Mechanism of Action
In the same manner as the predicate device, each aligner exerts gentle force to achieve progressive realignment of the teeth until the final correction has been attained. This is based on the treatment plan and proceeds over time.
### Comparison with predicate
A summary comparison of features is provided in the following Table:
| Device | New Device<br>(K213026) | Predicate Device Straight<br>T Clear Dental Aligner<br>(K201450) | Comparison |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Manufacturer | Shenzhen Meiming<br>Dentistry Technology<br>Co., Ltd | Straight T, Inc. | NA |
| Indication for use | The Clear Aligners<br>indicated for use in the<br>alignment of permanent<br>teeth (i.e. all second<br>molars) through<br>orthodontic treatment of<br>misalignment and<br>malocclusion. | The Straight T Clear<br>Dental Aligner<br>Is indicated for use in the<br>alignment of permanent<br>teeth (i e all second mol<br>ars) through orthodont ic<br>treatment of<br>misalignment and<br>malocclusion. | Same |
| Method of use | Each preformed plastic<br>tray is worn by the<br>patient as prescribed by | Each preformed plastic<br>tray is worn by the<br>patient as prescribed by | Same |
{5}------------------------------------------------
| | the dental practitioner,<br>usually a few weeks prior<br>to using the next<br>sequential aligners tray. | the dental practitioner,<br>usually a few weeks prior<br>to using the next<br>sequential aligners tray. | |
|---------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|
| Biocompatible | Yes | Yes | Same |
| OTC or Rx | Rx | Rx | Same |
| Software Use | Yes, 3Shape K180491 | Yes, 3Shape K180491 | Same |
| Sterile | No | No | Same |
There are no differences identified between new device and the predicate device for intended use, mode of action, method of use, material, biocompatibility and software, etc, thus they are substantial equivalent.
## Non-clinical Test
Non-clinical tests have been conducted to verify that the Clear Aligner meets all design specifications which supports the conclusion that it's Substantially Equivalent (SE) to the predicate device.
## Manufacturing validation accuracy testing
A manufacturing validation was performed to demonstrate the manufacturing process for Clear Aligner. Three critical aspects of the manufacturing process were assessed: digital dentition models from treatment planning, 3D printed molds, and the final thermoformed aligner.
An independent 3rd party software and digital calipers were used to perform point-to-point measurement. All translational measurements were within 0.3mm of the target input value, the predefined tolerance of the manufacturing process. There were no statistical differences in the difference in the intended and measured values observed from any of the groups. This test has met the pre-established acceptance criteria.
The results of the manufacturing validation accuracy testing support a determination of substantial equivalence.
## Biocompatibility Testing
The biocompatibility evaluation for the device was conducted in accordance with "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, Biological evaluation and testing within a risk management process -Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff" as recognized by FDA. The Clear aligner is considered surface contacting for a duration of greater than 30 days. The testing included the following tests:
- Cytotoxicity
- Irritation
- Sensitization
The results of the testing met the requirements of the study protocol and the material is considered non-cytotoxic, non-sensitizing and is not an intracutaneous irritant. The results of the studies further support a determination of substantial equivalence.
{6}------------------------------------------------
## Clinical Test
No clinical study is included in this submission.
## Conclusion:
The conclusion drawn from the nonclinical tests demonstrates that the subject device in 510(K) submission K213026, Clear Aligner is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the legally marketed predicate device cleared under K201450.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.