The OSSIOfiber® Staple is indicated for fixation of arthrodesis, osteotomies in hand or foot surgery in the presence of appropriate brace and/or immobilization. The number and size of the OSSIOfiber® Staples must be adapted to the indication.
Device Story
OSSIOfiber® Staple is a degradable bone fixation implant for hand and foot surgery. Composed of poly (L-lactide) (PLDLA) reinforced with continuous mineral fibers; device degrades via hydrolysis into alpha-hydroxy acids, transferring load to bone during healing. Eliminates need for hardware removal surgery. Implanted by surgeons in clinical settings using standard orthopedic tools. Provides mechanical fixation for arthrodesis, osteotomies, and fractures. Benefits patient by providing stable fixation that resorbs over time, reducing long-term foreign body presence.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performed static bending, bending fatigue, and pull-out testing per ASTM F564-17. Compared performance to primary predicate (K153395) and reference device (K181180) initially and following in-vitro degradation. Biocompatibility established via ISO 10993 data from previously cleared reference devices.
Technological Characteristics
Material: PLDLA polymer reinforced with continuous mineral fibers. Dimensions: 11-25 mm bridge lengths, 15-22 mm leg lengths. Sterilization: EtO. Mechanical testing per ASTM F564-17. Non-metallic, degradable fixation appliance.
Indications for Use
Indicated for fixation of arthrodesis, osteotomies, and fractures in hand or foot surgery in patients requiring brace and/or immobilization.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories are devices intended to be implanted consisting of one or more metallic components and their metallic fasteners. The devices contain a plate, a nail/plate combination, or a blade/plate combination that are made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, stainless steel, and titanium, that are intended to be held in position with fasteners, such as screws and nails, or bolts, nuts, and washers. These devices are used for fixation of fractures of the proximal or distal end of long bones, such as intracapsular, intertrochanteric, intercervical, supracondylar, or condylar fractures of the femur; for fusion of a joint; or for surgical procedures that involve cutting a bone. The devices may be implanted or attached through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, with the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in blue, and then the word "ADMINISTRATION" in a smaller font size below that.
January 21, 2022
OSSIO Ltd. % David McGurl Director, Regulatory Affairs MCRA, LLC 803 7th Street NW Washington, District of Columbia 20001
Re: K212594
Trade/Device Name: OSSIOfiber® Staple Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3030 Regulation Name: Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MNU Dated: January 10, 2022 Received: January 10, 2022
Dear David McGurl:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Limin Sun, Ph.D. Acting Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K212594
Device Name OSSIOfiber® Staple
Indications for Use (Describe)
The OSSIOfiber® Staple is indicated for fixation of arthrodesis, osteotomies in hand or foot surgery in the presence of appropriate brace and/or immobilization.
The number and size of the OSSIOfiber® Staples must be adapted to the indication.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <div> <span> <svg class="bi bi-check-square" fill="currentColor" height="1em" viewbox="0 0 16 16" width="1em" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <path d="M14 1H2a1 1 0 0 0-1 1v12a1 1 0 0 0 1 1h12a1 1 0 0 0 1-1V2a1 1 0 0 0-1-1zM2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v12a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h12a2 2 0 0 0 2-2V2a2 2 0 0 0-2-2H2z" fill-rule="evenodd"></path> <path d="M10.97 4.97a.75.75 0 0 1 1.071 1.05l-3.992 4.99a.75.75 0 0 1-1.08.02L4.324 8.384a.75.75 0 1 1 1.06-1.06l2.094 2.093 3.473-4.425a.236.236 0 0 1 .02-.022z" fill-rule="evenodd"></path> </svg> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> </div> |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span> <svg class="bi bi-square" fill="currentColor" height="1em" viewbox="0 0 16 16" width="1em" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <path d="M14 1H2a1 1 0 0 0-1 1v12a1 1 0 0 0 1 1h12a1 1 0 0 0 1-1V2a1 1 0 0 0-1-1zM2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v12a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h12a2 2 0 0 0 2-2V2a2 2 0 0 0-2-2H2z" fill-rule="evenodd"></path> </svg> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> </div> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) SUMMARY
#### OSSIOfiber® Staple
#### Submitter
#### Ossio Ltd.
8 HaTochen Street, Caesarea, Israel, 3079861
Phone: +972-4-9986600 Facsimile: +972-4-9986601 Contact Person: Taly Lindner Date Prepared: Jan 16, 2022
Name of Device: OSSIOfiber® Staple
Common or Usual Name: Staple, Absorbable
Classification Name: Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories
Regulatory Class: Class II, 21 C.F.R. § 888.3030
#### Product Code: MNU
#### Predicate Devices
OS2®-C Compression Staple (K153395) - Primary Predicate
#### Reference Devices
OSSIO® Pin Product Family (K181180) OSSIOfiber® Hammertoe Fixation System (K190652, K201803) OSSIOfiber® Compression Screw (K193660)
#### Device Description
The OSSIOfiber® Staple is a fixation implant made of degradable poly (L-lactide) (PLDLA) reinforced with continuous mineral fibers. OSSIOfiber® implants have been shown to be biocompatible. The polymer content degrades by hydrolysis into alpha-hydroxy acids that are metabolized by the body. The fibers are made of minerals that are found in natural bone. As the OSSIOfiber® implants degrade, the load transfers to the surrounding anatomy throughout the healing period of the osteotomy, fusion, or fracture. Substantial degradation takes place within approximately 18 months as shown in pre-clinical studies, thus eliminating the requirement for future hardware removal surgery.
The OSSIOfiber® Staples are supplied sterile, for single patient use only, and non-pyrogenic. They are available in several sizes: 11-25 mm bridge lengths, and 15-22 mm leg lengths.
The OSSIOfiber® Staples are designed to be used with commonly available orthopedic surgical tools such as ISO 9714 compatible instrumentations.
{4}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
The OSSIOfiber® Staple is indicated for fixation of arthrodesis, osteotomies, and fractures in hand or foot surgery in the presence of appropriate brace and/or immobilization.
The number and size of the OSSIOfiber® Staples must be adapted to the indication.
## Summary of Technological Characteristics
The OSSIOfiber® Staples have intended use, and similar indications for use, principles of operation and design characteristics as the primary predicate device the OS2®-C Compression Staple (K153395).
The OSSIOfiber® Staples' material composition as well as the manufacturing and sterilization methods are the same as that of the cleared reference devices the OSSIO® Pin Product Family (K181180), OSSIOfiber® Hammertoe Fixation System (K190652, K201803) and OSSIOfiber® Compression Screw (K193660). Both subject device and the primary predicate device are supplied sterile. The OSSIOfiber® Staple is sterilized by EtO whereas the primary predicate is sterilized by Gamma. The subject device is made of OSSIOfiber® material while the primary predicate is made of PEEK. The OSSIOfiber® Staple has slightly longer leg and bridge lengths compared to the primary predicate. Although there are differences with regards to material, shape and size compared to the primary predicate, mechanical testing demonstrated at least equivalent performance both initially and after in vitro degradation. Any differences between OSSIOfiber® Staple and its primary predicate device do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness.
# Non-Clinical Data
Static bending, bending fatigue and pull-out testing were performed as per ASTM F564-17 to verify the bending strength and stiffness, bending fatique strength, and pull-out fixation properties of the OSSIOfiber® Staple. Static bending and bending fatigue were compared to those of the primary predicate device (K153395). Pull-out testing was compared to those of the K181180 reference device. All testing were done initially and following in-vitro degradation. The in-vitro degradation profile was characterized.
Biocompatibility for the implants was established primarily based on the referenced ISO 10993 data from the previously cleared reference devices (K181180, K190652, K193660, K201803) as well as a rationale. A rationale was provided to support the MR safe labeling of the implant.
# Conclusions
The OSSIOfiber® Staple is as safe and effective as its primary predicate device, the OS2®-C Compression Staple (K153395). The OSSIOfiber® Staples have the same intended use, and similar indications for use, principles of operation, and design characteristics as the primary predicate device the OS2®-C Compression Staple (K153395). Material composition is the same as the reference devices (K181180, K193660, K190652, K201803). The minor differences do not alter the intended surgical use of the implant and do not affect its safety and effectiveness when used as labeled. Non-clinical testing data demonstrate that the OSSIOffber® Staple is at least as safe and effective as the primary predicate device. Thus, the OSSIOfiber® Staple is substantially equivalent.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.