The STA R Max 3® and STA Compact Max 3® are fully automatic clinical analyzers designed to be used by professional laboratory personnel and to perform tests on human venous plasmas (in 3.2% trisodium citrate tubes) the results of which aid in the diagnosis of coagulation abnormalities or in monitoring anticoagulant therapy.
Device Story
STA R Max 3 and STA Compact Max 3 are automated coagulation analyzers for clinical/hospital laboratories. They process human venous plasma samples to perform clotting (chronometric) and photometric assays. The system uses inductive sensors to measure metal ball oscillation (viscosity-based) for clotting times and monochromatic light absorbance for enzymatic/immunological reactions. An optional HIL module provides semi-quantitative indices for hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia. A central processing unit manages sample handling, reagent delivery, and result reporting. Operators interact via touchscreen/barcode scanner. The device aids clinicians in diagnosing coagulation disorders and monitoring anticoagulant therapy by providing quantitative coagulation parameters.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Method comparison studies (CLSI EP09c) across three sites compared subject devices to predicates using five assays (PT, APTT, Fibrinogen, ATIII, D-Dimer), showing high correlation (r > 0.98). Precision studies (CLSI EP05-A3) over 20 days demonstrated acceptable CVs. HIL module performance was validated against reference methods (cobas 8000/spectrophotometer) with Passing-Bablok regression analysis confirming index determination accuracy.
Technological Characteristics
Automated coagulation analyzer; chronometric (inductive metal ball oscillation) and photometric (405/540 nm) measurement principles. Features PSR (Pipettor Simple Resolution) fluidic system, optional HIL module, and touchscreen interface. Connectivity includes barcode scanner and network integration. Software runs on Windows 10 with cybersecurity controls (encryption, firewall, antivirus).
Indications for Use
Indicated for professional laboratory personnel to perform coagulation tests on human venous plasma (3.2% trisodium citrate) to aid in diagnosing coagulation abnormalities or monitoring anticoagulant therapy.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A multipurpose system for in vitro coagulation studies is a device consisting of one automated or semiautomated instrument and its associated reagents and controls. The system is used to perform a series of coagulation studies and coagulation factor assays.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). A control intended for use with a multipurpose system for in vitro coagulation studies is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 864.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
June 7, 2023
Diagnostica Stago SAS % Anthony Dennis Director of US Market Access Diagnostica Stago Inc. 5 Century Drive Parsippany, New Jersey 07054
Re: K212183
Trade/Device Name: STA R Max 3, STA Compact Max 3 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 864.5425 Regulation Name: Multipurpose System For In Vitro Coagulation Studies Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JPA Dated: September 30, 2022 Received: October 5, 2022
Dear Anthony Dennis:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801 and Part 809); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Image /page/1/Picture/5 description: The image contains the text "Min Wu-S" in a large, sans-serif font. The text is black and appears to be the main subject of the image. In the background, there is a faint, light blue watermark of the letters "FDA".
Min Wu, Ph.D. Branch Chief Division of Immunology and Hematology Devices OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K212183
Device Name STA R Max 3® and STA Compact Max 3®
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The STA R Max 3® and STA Compact Max 3® are fully automatic clinical analyzers designed to be used by professional laboratory personnel and to perform tests on human venous plasmas (in 3.2% trisodium citrate tubes) the results of which aid in the diagnosis of coagulation abnormalities or in monitoring anticoagulant therapy.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
| Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) |
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Stago. The logo consists of the word "Stago" in red, with a stylized graphic above it. The graphic appears to be three curved shapes, one red and two brown, arranged in a circular pattern. The overall design is simple and modern.
# 510(k) SUMMARY
This 510(k) summary of safety and effectiveness is submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92 and follows FDA guidance 'The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications [510(k)]', issued July 28, 2014.
# 1. Submitter
Diagnostica Stago, Inc. 5 Century Drive Parsippany, NJ 07054 Primary Contact: Anthony Dennis, RAC, CBA (ASQ), MBA Director, US Market Access Phone: 1 - (973) - 775-1200 x4162
On Behalf of: Diagnostica Stago SAS
Date: 12 July 2021; Revised 05 June 2023
# 2. Device
| Device Name: | STA R Max 3® / STA Compact Max 3® |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Automated Coagulation Analyzer |
| Classification Name: | System, Multipurpose for In Vitro Coagulation Studies |
| Regulatory Class: | Class II |
| Panel: | Hematology |
| Product Code: | JPA |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 864.5424 |
Note that as a successor of earlier instruments in their respective families, reference to "STA R Max 3" or "Compact Max 3" is in reference to these families of analyzers with the aforementioned improvements. As such, elements in this submission, such as the intended use below are not version specific.
## Intended Use:
The STA R Max 3® and STA Compact Max 3® are fully automatic clinical analyzers designed to be used by professional laboratory personnel and to perform tests on human venous plasmas (in 3.2% trisodium citrate tubes) the results of which aid in the diagnosis of coagulation abnormalities or in monitoring anticoagulant therapy.
## 3. Predicate Device
| Device Name: | STA R Max® (K151867) / STA Compact Max® (K130090) |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Automated Coagulation Analyzer |
| Classification Name: | System, Multipurpose for In Vitro Coagulation Studies |
| Regulatory Class: | Class II |
| Panel: | Hematology |
| Product Code: | JPA |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 864.5424 |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo for Stago. The logo consists of the word "Stago" in red, with a stylized graphic above it. The graphic appears to be an abstract shape in two colors, red and brown, possibly representing a drop or a leaf.
The predicate has not been subject to design-related recalls for any of the applications associated with this premarket notification. No reference devices were used in this submission.
# 4. Device Description / Test Principle
# 4.1.1. STA R Max 30 and STA Compact Max 30 Test Principle
The technological characteristics are the same for all STA R Max® Family and STA Compact Max® family analyzers, including STA R Max 30 and STA Compact Max 30, which is based on two measurement principles.
Chronometric measurement principle:
The principle consists of measuring the variation of the metal ball oscillation amplitude through inductive sensors. The ball has a pendula movement due to an alternating electromagnetic field generated by two independent drive coils and two curved rail tracks in the bottom of the cuvettes. The oscillation amplitude is constant when the viscosity of the reaction volume in the cuvette remains constant.
The oscillation amplitude decreases when the viscosity of the reaction volume in the cuvette increases. The amplitude of the oscillation ball is analyzed to determine coagulation time in the cuvette.
. Photometry measurement principle:
The principles consists of measuring the variation of absorbance (optical density, O.D.) of monochromatic light (405 nm or 540 nm) passing through a cuvette as an enzymatic or immunological reaction takes place.
The variation of absorbance is analyzed to determine enzymatic activity or quantification (by immune aggregation) of factors related to coagulation.
# 4.1.2. STA R Max 3® Device Description
Diagnostica Stago's STA R Max 30 analyzers are modified versions of the STA R Max® analyzer, originally cleared for marketing by the FDA under K151867 as an in-vitro diagnostic device.
The STA-R family of analyzers is composed of:
- STAR® cleared in 1998: K983460 ●
- . STA-R Evolution® cleared in 2008: K082675
- . STA-R Evolution® Expert Series cleared in 2009: K093001
- . STA R Max® cleared in 2015: K151867
All these analyzers are fully automatic systems designed to perform tests on human plasmas and to study coagulation parameters.
Samples and test reagents are loaded into the instrument where sample handling, reagent delivery, analysis and reporting of results are performed automatically. A central processing unit controls the instrument such as, management of patient results, quality control, system supervision, support for instrument maintenance and workload optimization.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Stago. The logo consists of the word "Stago" in red, with a stylized graphic above it. The graphic appears to be two curved shapes, one red and one brown, arranged to suggest a drop or abstract form. The word "Stago" is in a bold, sans-serif font.
The analyzers use Diagnostica Stago reagents in addition to open adaptation of other available reagents. The instrument performs multiple test methodologies in random access, as selected by the user. These include clotting time or clot-based tests (i.e. chronometric measures) and photometric assays on plasma samples.
All the information on the analyzers, intended use and description, come from the instrument manual/labeling, which is the same for all STA R Max® family of analyzers (VOL_013, Labeling).
# 4.1.3. STA Compact Max 3® Device Description
Diagnostica Stago's STA Compact Max®3 analyzers are modified versions of the STA Compact Max® analyzer, originally cleared for marketing by the FDA under K130090 as an in-vitro diagnostic device.
The STA Compact® family of analyzers is composed of:
- STA Compact cleared in 1996: K961579, K093167 ●
- STA Compact with Cap piercing Options cleared in 1996, with an add to file •
- . STA Compact Max cleared in 2013: K130090
All these analyzers are fully automatic systems designed to perform tests on human plasmas, the results of which aid in the diagnosis of coagulation abnormalities or in monitoring anticoagulant therapy.
Once samples and test reagents are loaded onto the instrument, sample handling, reagent delivery, analysis and reporting of results are performed automatically. A central processing unit controls instrument functions, including management of patient's results, quality control, scheduling of instrument maintenance and workload organization.
The analyzers use Diagnostica Stago reagents in addition to open adaptation of other available reagents. The instrument performs multiple test methodologies in random access, as selected by the user. These include clotting time or clot-based tests (i.e. chronometric measures) and photometric assays on plasma samples.
All the information on the analyzers, intended use and description, come from the instrument manual/labeling, which is the same for all Compact Max® family of analyzers (VOL_013, Labeling).
# 4.1.4. Change to Control of Fluidic System and Addition of HIL Module
To facilitate in user maintenance and manufacturing process, the PSR module has been designed to replace the Hamilton syringes and Valcor pump of the fluidic circuit on all Diagnostica Stago analyzers.
The HIL module is a detection module developed to estimate interferences (Hemoglobin, Icterus, Lipemia) which may affect chromogenic and immune-turbidimetric tests. The analysis is performed before delivery in the cuvette and provides results of an index of interferences concentration to the biologist (display of the data on screen monitor). The plasma sample is not altered during HIL evaluation.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Stago. The logo consists of the word "Stago" in red, with a stylized graphic above it. The graphic appears to be two curved shapes, one red and one brown, arranged to suggest a drop or abstract form. The word "Stago" is in a serif font.
# 4.1.5. Reagent Applications in this 510(k) Notification
Five assays were used to demonstrate substantial equivalence, i.e. STA® - Neoplastine CI Plus (10), STA® - PTTA (5), STA® - Fibrinogen (5), STA® - Stachrom® ATIII (6) and STA® -Liatest DDi. These assays cover the three measuring principles, i.e. chronometric, chromogenic and immuno-turbidimetric, and the different reaction set-ups regarding sample dilution (undiluted or diluted) and reagents (use of only the third needle for reagent, or use of both second and third needles for reagent). The table below describes the configuration used for each assay.
| Assay | Measuring<br>Principle | Sample Dilution<br>Set-Up | Reagent Set-up | Prior<br>regulatory<br>clearance (K#) |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| STA® - Neoplastine CI Plus (10) | Chronometric | Undiluted | Only the third<br>needle | K922040 |
| STA® - PTTA (5) | Chronometric | Undiluted | Second and third<br>needles for reagent | K861190 |
| STA® - Fibrinogen (5) | Chronometric | Diluted | Only the third<br>needle | K840211 |
| STA® - Stachrom ATIII (6) | Chromogenic | Diluted | Second and third<br>needles for reagent | K832592 |
| STA® - Liatest DDi | Immuno-<br>turbidimetric | Undiluted | Second and third<br>needles for reagent | K162227 |
| Table 1: Description of the test configurations for the assays used for validation | | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|
| | | |
The intended Environment of Use is a clinical central/hospital laboratory.
## 5. Substantial Equivalence
| Attributes or Characteristics | Predicate Device<br>STA R Max (K151867) | Candidate Device<br>STA R Max 3 |
|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Regulatory Classification | JPA, Class II<br>System, Multipurpose for in vitro<br>coagulation studies | Same |
| Indications for use | The STA R Max is a fully automatic<br>clinical instrument designed to perform<br>tests on human plasmas, the results of<br>which aid in the diagnosis of coagulation<br>abnormalities or in monitoring<br>anticoagulant therapy. | The STA R Max 3® and STA Compact<br>Max 3® are fully automatic clinical<br>analyzers designed to be used by<br>professional laboratory personnel and to<br>perform tests on human venous plasmas<br>(in 3.2% trisodium citrate tubes) the<br>results of which aid in the diagnosis of<br>coagulation abnormalities or in<br>monitoring anticoagulant therapy. |
| Anatomical Sites | In vitro testing of human plasma | Same |
| Sample Matrix | Human plasma<br>3.2% sodium citrate | Same |
| Where Used: hospital, home,<br>ambulance, etc. | Hospital Laboratory or other Health Care<br>Laboratory. | Same |
| Attributes or Characteristics | Predicate Device<br>STA R Max (K151867) | Candidate Device<br>STA R Max 3 |
| Measurement Principle | Chronometric method (clotting time):<br>mechanical measurement of the<br>oscillation of the metal ball placed in the<br>cuvette<br>Photometric method: light absorption<br>technique provided by a filtered light<br>source<br>(405nm, 540nm). | Same |
| Cap Piercing | Available as an option | Available as an option with HIL pre-<br>analytical module.<br>New needle connector, new cap<br>piercing foot and evolution of the lock<br>system. |
| Control of Fluidic<br>System | Valcor pump and Hamilton syringes | PSR (Pipettor Simple Resolution)<br>in replacement of Valcor pump<br>and Hamilton syringes |
| Needles | One sample, Two reagent | Same |
| Operating Environment<br>Temperature | 59° - 89.5°F | Same |
| User/Patient Data Input | Touchscreen, keyboard, and/or barcode<br>scanner | Same |
| Specimen Processing | Automatic pipetting and dilution | Same |
| Random Access | Yes | Same |
| Liquid Level Sensing | Yes | Same |
| Stat Testing | Yes | Same |
| Parameters | Prothrombin Time (PT) seconds, PT INR,<br>Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time<br>(APTT), Fibrinogen, Thrombin Time<br>(TT), Reptilase, Extrinsic pathway<br>factors, Intrinsic pathway factors, Anti-Xa<br>(UFH, LMWH), Antithrombin (AT)<br>activity, D-Dimer, Protein C activity,<br>Protein S activity, Free Protein S antigen,<br>Lupus anticoagulant, vWF antigen,<br>Plasminogen | Same |
| Attributes or Characteristics | Predicate Device<br>STA R Max (K151867) | Candidate Device<br>STA R Max 3 |
| HIL Pre-analytical<br>Module | Not available | Avalable as an option: Semi quantitative<br>determination of hemolysis, icterus and<br>Lipemia (HIL) in patient plasma, reported<br>as indices according to CLSI C56-A<br>document. No predefined alerts are set-up<br>in the analyzer; users are responsible for<br>setting thresholds according to practices.<br>Any evaluation of indices as potential<br>interfering substances are left to the end<br>users. |
| Data Storage Capacity | 160 GB | 320 GB |
| Software | Windows XP | Windows 10 |
| Cybersecurity | In 2019, Stago implemented a new PC-<br>Gen with a new Windows 10 Operating<br>System (OS), updated software, and the<br>introduction of cybersecurity via internal<br>documentation agreed with FDA during<br>Q181507. | Introduced with user account management<br>(reinforced passwords, restrictive access,<br>log history...), firewall, antivirus, and<br>data encryption. |
### Table 2: STA R Max 3 Similarities Between Candidate and Predicate Devices
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Stago. The logo consists of the word "Stago" in a red, serif font. Above the word is an abstract graphic element. The graphic element is composed of two curved shapes, one red and one brown, that appear to be overlapping or intertwined.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/8/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Stago. The logo features the word "Stago" in red, with a stylized graphic above it. The graphic consists of two curved shapes, one red and one brown, that appear to be overlapping or interacting with each other. The overall design is simple and modern.
### Table 3: STA R Max 3 Differences Between Candidate and Predicate Devices
### Table 4: STA Compact Max 3 Similarities Between Candidate and Predicate Devices
| Attributes or Characteristics | Predicate Device<br>STA Compact Max (K130090) | Candidate Device<br>STA Compact Max 3 |
|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Regulatory Classification | JPA, Class II<br>System, Multipurpose for in vitro<br>coagulation studies | Same |
| Indications for use | The STA Compact Max is a fully<br>automatic clinical analyzer designed to<br>perform tests on human plasmas, the<br>results of which aid in the diagnosis~ of<br>coagulation abnormalities or in<br>monitoring anticoagulant therapy. | The STA R Max 3® and STA Compact<br>Max 3® are fully automatic clinical<br>analyzers designed to be used by<br>professional laboratory personnel and to<br>perform tests on human venous plasmas<br>(in 3.2% trisodium citrate tubes) the<br>results of which aid in the diagnosis of<br>coagulation abnormalities or in<br>monitoring anticoagulant therapy. |
| Anatomical Sites | In vitro testing of human plasma | Same |
| Sample Matrix | Human plasma<br>3.2% sodium citrate | Same |
| Where Used: hospital, home,<br>ambulance, etc. | Hospital Laboratory or other Health Care<br>Laboratory. | Same |
| Measurement Principle | Chronometric method (clotting time):<br>mechanical measurement of the<br>oscillation of the metal ball placed in the<br>cuvette<br>Photometric method: light absorption<br>technique provided by a filtered light<br>source | Same |
{9}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/9/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Stago. The logo consists of the word "Stago" in red, with a stylized graphic above it. The graphic appears to be an abstract shape in red and brown, possibly representing a drop or a leaf.
| Attributes or Characteristics | Predicate Device STA Compact Max (K130090) | Candidate Device STA Compact Max 3 |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | (405nm, 540nm). | |
| Cap Piercing | Available as an option | Available as an option with HIL pre- analytical module.<br>New needle connector, new cap piercing foot and evolution of the lock system. |
| Control of Fluidic System | Valcor pump and Hamilton syringes | PSR (Pipettor Simple Resolution) in replacement of Valcor pump and Hamilton syringes |
| Needles | One sample, Two reagent | One sample, Two reagent |
| Operating Environment Temperature | 59° - 89.5°F | Same |
| User/Patient Data Input | Touchscreen, keyboard, and/or barcode scanner | Same |
| Specimen Processing | Automatic pipetting and dilution | Same |
| Random Access | Yes | Same |
| Liquid Level Sensing | Yes | Same |
| Stat Testing | Yes | Same |
| Parameters | Prothrombin Time (PT) seconds, PT INR, Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT), Fibrinogen, Thrombin Time (TT), Reptilase, Extrinsic pathway factors, Intrinsic pathway factors, Anti-Xa (UFH, LMWH), Antithrombin (AT) activity, D-Dimer, Protein C activity, Protein S activity, Free Protein S antigen, Lupus anticoagulant, vWF antigen, Plasminogen | Same |
{10}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/10/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Stago. The logo consists of the word "Stago" in red, with a stylized graphic above it. The graphic appears to be two curved shapes, one red and one brown, arranged in a circular fashion. The overall design is simple and modern.
| | | | Table 5: STA Compact Max 3 Differences Between Candidate and Predicate Devices | | |
|--|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|
|--|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|
| Attributes or Characteristics | Predicate Device<br>STA Compact Max (K130090) | Candidate Device<br>STA Compact Max 3 |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| HIL Pre-analytical<br>Module | Not available | Avalable as an option: Semi quantitative<br>determination of hemolysis, icterus and<br>Lipemia (HIL) in patient plasma, reported<br>as indices according to CLSI C56-A<br>document. No predefined alerts are set-up<br>in the analyzer; users are responsible for<br>setting thresholds according to practices.<br>Any evaluation of indices as potential<br>interfering substances are left to the end<br>users. |
| Data Storage Capacity | 160 GB | 320 GB |
| Software | Windows XP | Windows 10 |
| Cybersecurity | In 2019, Stago implemented a new PC-<br>Gen with a new Windows 10 Operating<br>System (OS), updated software, and the<br>introduction of cybersecurity via internal<br>documentation agreed with FDA during<br>Q181507. | Introduced with user account management<br>(reinforced passwords, restrictive access,<br>log history...), firewall, antivirus, and<br>data encryption. |
### Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
- . CLSI EP09c, Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline
- CLSI EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline - Third Edition.
## Performance Data
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
## Method Comparison: STA R Max 3
Method comparison studies designed according to CLSI EP09c recommendations were conducted at three external sites.
Samples were selected in order to cover the entire measuring range of each assay and measured on both the predicate device (STA R Max) and subject device (STA R Max 3). Results were compared by either Passing & Bablok or Deming regression analysis based on the distribution. The following summary shows the results of this analysis without outliers across the analytical measuring range and targeted medical decision points per parameter.
### STA R Max 3: STA - Neoplastine CI Plus Passing-Bablok Regression Numerical Results
| Site | Slope<br>(95% CI) | Intercept<br>(95% CI) | rSpearman<br>(95% CI) |
|-----------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------|
| All Sites | 0.98<br>(0.97 to<br>0.98) | 0.20 sec<br>(0.06 to 0.30) | 0.997<br>(0.996 to<br>0.998) |
{11}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/11/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Stago. The logo consists of the word "Stago" in a red, serif font. Above the word is an abstract graphic element that resembles a stylized, incomplete circle or crescent shape. The top portion of the shape is red, while the bottom portion is brown. The overall design is simple and modern.
| Site | Slope<br>(95% CI) | Intercept<br>(95% CI) | rSpearman<br>(95% CI) |
|-----------|---------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------|
| All Sites | 1.00<br>(0.98 to<br>1.01) | -0.32<br>(-1.02 to 0.32) | 0.997 (0.996<br>to 0.998) |
STA R Max 3: STA - PTTA Passing-Bablok Regression Numerical Results
STA R Max 3: STA - Fibrinogen Passing-Bablok Regression Numerical Results
| Site | Slope<br>(95% CI) | Intercept<br>(95% CI) | rSpearman (95% CI) |
|-----------|------------------------|-------------------------------|------------------------|
| All Sites | 1.01<br>(0.99 to 1.03) | 4.26 mg/dL<br>(-1.83 ; 10.14) | 0.996 (0.995 to 0.997) |
STA R Max 3: STA - Stachrom ATIII Passing-Bablok Regression Numerical Results
| Site | Slope<br>(95% CI) | Intercept<br>(95% CI) | rSpearman<br>(95% CI) |
|-----------|------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------------|
| All Sites | 1.03<br>(1.00 to 1.07) | -1.03%<br>(-3.15 ; 2.00) | 0.980<br>(0.972 to<br>0.985) |
STA R Max 3: STA - Liatest D-DI Passing-Bablok Regression Numerical Results
| Site | Slope<br>(95% CI) | Intercept<br>(95% CI) | rSpearman<br>(95% CI) |
|-----------|------------------------|-------------------------------|------------------------------|
| All Sites | 1.02<br>(1.01 to 1.03) | -0.02 µg/mL<br>(-0.04 ; 0,01) | 0.998<br>(0.998 to<br>0.999) |
# Method Comparison: STA Compact Max 3
Method comparison studies designed according to CLSI EP09c recommendations were conducted at three external sites.
Samples were selected in order to cover the entire measuring range of each assay and measured on both the predicate device (STA Compact Max) and subject device (STA Compact Max 3). Results were compared by either Passing & Bablok or Deming regression analysis based on the distribution. The following summary shows the results of this analysis without outliers across the analytical measuring range and targeted medical decision points per parameter.
STA Compact Max 3: STA - Neoplastine CI Plus Passing-Bablok Regression Numerical Results
| Site | Slope<br>(95% CI) | Intercept<br>(95% CI) | <i>r</i> Spearman<br>(95% CI) |
|-----------|---------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------|
| All Sites | 0.99 (0.98 to 1.00) | 0.20 sec (0.05 to 0.35) | 0.994 (0.993 to 0.996) |
# STA Compact Max 3: STA - PTTA Passing-Bablok Regression Numerical Results
| Site | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | rSpearman (95% CI) |
|-----------|---------------------|--------------------------|------------------------|
| All Sites | 0.99 (0.97 to 1.00) | 0.06 sec (-0.56 to 0.81) | 0.996 (0.995 to 0.997) |
STA Compact Max 3: STA - Fibrinogen Passing-Bablok Regression Numerical Results
{12}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/12/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Stago. The logo consists of the word "Stago" in red, with a stylized graphic above it. The graphic appears to be an abstract representation of a drop or a leaf, with the top portion in red and the bottom portion in brown. The overall design is simple and modern.
| Site | Slope<br>(95% CI) | Intercept<br>(95% CI) | rSpearman<br>(95% CI) |
|-----------|------------------------|-------------------------------|---------------------------|
| All Sites | 1.01 (1.00<br>to 1.03) | 4.94 mg/dL<br>(0.67 to 11.25) | 0.995 (0.993<br>to 0.996) |
### STA Compact Max 3: STA - Stachrom ATIII Passing-Bablok Regression Numerical Results
| Site | Slope<br>(95% CI) | Intercept<br>(95% CI) | <i>r</i> Spearman (95% CI) |
|-----------|---------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------|
| All Sites | 1.00 (1.00 to 1.03) | 0.00% (-1.63 to 0.00) | 0.981 (0.975 to 0.986) |
### STA Compact Max 3: STA - Liatest D-DI Passing-Bablok Regression Numerical Results
| Site | Slope<br>(95% CI) | Intercept<br>(95% CI) | <i>r</i> Spearman<br>(95% CI) |
|-----------|---------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| All Sites | 1.02 (1.01 to 1.03) | -0.01 μg/mL (-0.04 to 0.01) | 0.997 (0.996 to 0.998) |
## Method Comparison: HIL
The candidate instrument STA R Max 3 was compared to the reference methods, cobas® 8000 modular analyzer (Hemolyis, Icterus, and Lipemia) and spectrophotometer (Lipemia) in a method comparison study performed in accordance with CLSI EP09c guideline at one site.
| Hemolysis Passing-Bablok Regression | | | |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------|------------------------------|
| Analysis | Slope<br>(95% CI) | Intercept<br>(95% CI) | R<br>Spearman<br>(95% CI) |
| Hemolysis<br>With<br>Outliers | 1.12 (1.08<br>to 1.19) | -0.03 g/L (-0.06<br>to -0.01) | 0.954<br>(0.916 to<br>0.975) |
| Hemolysis<br>Without<br>Outliers | 1.11 (1.07<br>to 1.14) | -0.03 g/L (-0.05<br>to -0.01) | 0.948<br>(0.904 to<br>0.972) |
# Hemolysis Passing-Rablok Regression
#### Icterus Passing-Bablok Regression
| Analysis | Slope<br>(95% CI) | Intercept<br>(95% CI) | R<br>Spearman<br>(95% CI) |
|----------|------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------------|
| Icterus | 0.99 (0.96<br>to 1.07) | 0.26 mg/dL<br>(0.02 to 0.48) | 0.956<br>(0.920 to<br>0.976) |
#### Lipemia Linear Regression versus Spectrophotometer
| Analysis | Regression coefficient (r) |
|----------|----------------------------|
| Lipemia | 0.91 ; P<0.001 |
### Lipemia Linear Regression versus cobas® 8000
| Analysis | Regression coefficient (r) |
|----------|----------------------------|
| Lipemia | 0.97 ; P<0.001 |
{13}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/13/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Stago. The logo features the word "Stago" in a red, serif font. Above the word is an abstract graphic element that resembles a stylized leaf or flame in two colors: red and brown. The red portion is larger and positioned above the brown portion, creating a sense of depth and movement.
## Precision/Reproducibility
Single-site precision testing was performed in accordance with CLSI EP05-A3 over 20 days at one external site. Three samples per parameter were tested across the applicable measuring ranges, with two runs per day and two replicates per day. Each run was at least two hours apart. The acceptance criteria were met for all samples in the studies.
| STA-Neoplastine CI Plus (sec) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----|----------|------------|-------|-------------------------------------|-------|-------------|-------|--------------------|-------|-------------|-------|
| Analyzer | Sample | N | Mean sec | Within-Run | | Between-Run<br>(= Between-Operator) | | Between-Day | | Between-Instrument | | Within-Site | |
| | | | | SD | CV(%) | SD | CV(%) | SD | CV(%) | SD | CV(%) | SD | CV(%) |
| 403 | 1 | 80 | 15.8 | 0.139 | 0.9 | 0.104 | 0.7 | 0.036 | 0.2 | | | 0.177 | 1.1 |
| 403 | 2 | 80 | 39.7 | 0.243 | 0.6 | 0.417 | 1.1 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 0.483 | 1.2 |
| 403 | 3 | 80 | 61.1 | 0.415 | 0.7 | 0.606 | 1.0 | 0.326 | 0.5 | | | 0.804 | 1.3 |
| 403 | 4 | 80 | 14.0 | 0.092 | 0.7 | 0.034 | 0.2 | 0.044 | 0.3 | | | 0.108 | 0.8 |
| 403 | 5 | 80 | 24.0 | 0.186 | 0.8 | 0.176 | 0.7 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 0.256 | 1.1 |
| 404 | 1 | 80 | 15.7 | 0.101 | 0.6 | 0.145 | 0.9 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 0.177 | 1.1 |
| 404 | 2 | 80 | 39.5 | 0.188 | 0.5 | 0.309 | 0.8 | 0.170 | 0.4 | | | 0.400 | 1.0 |
| 404 | 3 | 80 | 60.7 | 0.376 | 0.6 | 0.691 | 1.1 | 0.271 | 0.4 | | | 0.832 | 1.4 |
| 404 | 4 | 80 | 13.8 | 0.096 | 0.7 | 0.158 | 1.1 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 0.185 | 1.3 |
| 404 | 5 | 80 | 23.7 | 0.165 | 0.7 | 0.294 | 1.2 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 0.337 | 1.4 |
| 426 | 1 | 80 | 15.7 | 0.088 | 0.6 | 0.140 | 0.9 | 0.027 | 0.2 | | | 0.168 | 1.1 |
| 426 | 2 | 80 | 39.5 | 0.306 | 0.8 | 0.326 | 0.8 | 0.181 | 0.5 | | | 0.483 | 1.2 |
| 426 | 3 | 80 | 60.6 | 0.281 | 0.5 | 0.723 | 1.2 | 0.048 | 0.1 | | | 0.777 | 1.3 |
| 426 | 4 | 80 | 13.8 | 0.075 | 0.5 | 0.079 | 0.6 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 0.109 | 0.8 |
| 426 | 5 | 80 | 23.8 | 0.158 | 0.7 | 0.147 | 0.6 | 0.027 | 0.1 | | | 0.218 | 0.9 |
| All instruments combined | 1 | 240 | 15.7 | 0.112 | 0.7 | 0.131 | 0.8 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 0.065 | 0.4 | 0.184 | 1.2 |
| All instruments combined | 2 | 240 | 39.6 | 0.251 | 0.6 | 0.355 | 0.9 | 0.111 | 0.3 | 0.113 | 0.3 | 0.462 | 1.2 |
| All instruments combined | 3 | 240 | 60.8 | 0.363 | 0.6 | 0.672 | 1.1 | 0.253 | 0.4 | 0.186 | 0.3 | 0.826 | 1.4 |
| All instruments combined | 4 | 240 | 13.9 | 0.088 | 0.6 | 0.104 | 0.7 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 0.105 | 0.8 | 0.172 | 1.2 |
| All instruments combined | 5 | 240 | 23.8 | 0.169 | 0.7 | 0.218 | 0.9 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 0.151 | 0.6 | 0.314 | 1.3 |
### PT (STA-Neoplastine CI Plus (10) (sec))
## APTT (STA-PTTA (5) (sec))
| STA-PTTA<br>(sec) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|--------------------------------|--------|-----|-------|------------|-------|-------------------------------------|-------|-------------|-------|--------------------|-------|-------------|-------|
| Analyzer | Sample | N | Mean | Within-Run | | Between-Run<br>(= Between-Operator) | | Between-Day | | Between-Instrument | | Within-Site | |
| | | | sec | SD | CV(%) | SD | CV(%) | SD | CV(%) | SD | CV(%) | SD | CV(%) |
| 403 | 1 | 80 | 31.5 | 0.195 | 0.6 | 0.238 | 0.8 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 0.308 | 1.0 |
| | 2 | 80 | 89.5 | 1.123 | 1.3 | 1.433 | 1.6 | 1.244 | 1.4 | | | 2.205 | 2.5 |
| | 3 | 80 | 133.2 | 2.237 | 1.7 | 2.239 | 1.7 | 1.792 | 1.3 | | | 3.637 | 2.7 |
| | 4 | 80 | 31.9 | 0.138 | 0.4 | 0.167 | 0.5 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 0.216 | 0.7 |
| | 5 | 80 | 55.5 | 0.504 | 0.9 | 0.716 | 1.3 | 0.393 | 0.7 | | | 0.960 | 1.7 |
| 404 | 1 | 80 | 31.5 | 0.185 | 0.6 | 0.253 | 0.8 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 0.313 | 1.0 |
| | 2 | 80 | 88.6 | 0.772 | 0.9 | 1.238 | 1.4 | 0.694 | 0.8 | | | 1.616 | 1.8 |
| | 3 | 80 | 131.5 | 1.057 | 0.8 | 2.378 | 1.8 | 1.184 | 0.9 | | | 2.859 | 2.2 |
| | 4 | 80 | 31.9 | 0.116 | 0.4 | 0.167 | 0.5 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 0.203 | 0.6 |
| | 5 | 80 | 55.0 | 0.236 | 0.4 | 0.563 | 1.0 | 0.425 | 0.8 | | | 0.744 | 1.4 |
| 426 | 1 | 80 | 31.2 | 0.165 | 0.5 | 0.244 | 0.8 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 0.294 | 0.9 |
| | 2 | 80 | 88.6 | 0.486 | 0.5 | 1.653 | 1.9 | 0.662 | 0.7 | | | 1.846 | 2.1 |
| | 3 | 80 | 129.0 | 2.241 | 1.7 | 1.322 | 1.0 | 2.124 | 1.6 | | | 3.359 | 2.6 |
| | 4 | 80 | 31.6 | 0.165 | 0.5 | 0.189 | 0.6 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 0.251 | 0.8 |
| | 5 | 80 | 54.8 | 0.370 | 0.7 | 0.796 | 1.5 | 0.283 | 0.5 | | | 0.922 | 1.7 |
| All<br>instruments<br>combined | 1 | 240 | 31.4 | 0.181 | 0.6 | 0.244 | 0.8 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 0.152 | 0.5 | 0.340 | 1.1 |
| | 2 | 240 | 88.9 | 0.837 | 0.9 | 1.456 | 1.6 | 0.897 | 1.0 | 0.441 | 0.5 | 1.955 | 2.2 |
| | 3 | 240 | 131.2 | 1.935 | 1.5 | 2.035 | 1.6 | 1.734 | 1.3 | 2.003 | 1.5 | 3.861 | 2.9 |
| | 4 | 240 | 31.8 | 0.141 | 0.4 | 0.175 | 0.6 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 0.200 | 0.6 | 0.301 | 0.9 |
| | 5 | 240 | 55.1 | 0.388 | 0.7 | 0.700 | 1.3 | 0.367 | 0.7 | 0.330 | 0.6 | 0.940 | 1.7 |
{14}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/14/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Stago. The logo features the word "Stago" in red, with a stylized graphic above it. The graphic consists of two curved shapes, one red and one brown, that appear to be overlapping or interacting with each other.
### FIB (STA-Fibrinogen (5) (mg/dL))
| STA-Fibrinogen<br>(mg/dL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|--------------------------------|--------|-----|-------|------------|-------|-------------------------------------|-------|-------------|-------|--------------------|-------|-------------|-------|
| Analyzer | Sample | N | Mean | Within-Run | | Between-Run<br>(= Between-Operator) | | Between-Day | | Between-Instrument | | Within-Site | |
| | | | mg/dL | SD | CV(%) | SD | CV(%) | SD | CV(%) | SD | CV(%) | SD | CV(%) |
| 403 | 1 | 80 | 553 | 8.042 | 1.5 | 5.749 | 1.0 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 9.886 | 1.8 |
| 403 | 2 | 80 | 736 | 10.434 | 1.4 | 8.252 | 1.1 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 13.303 | 1.8 |
| 403 | 3 | 80 | 992 | 20.287 | 2.0 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 8.186 | 0.8 | | | 21.876 | 2.2 |
| 403 | 4 | 80 | 252 | 4.970 | 2.0 | 2.966 | 1.2 | 1.099 | 0.4 | | | 5.891 | 2.3 |
| 403 | 5 | 80 | 110 | 1.761 | 1.6 | 1.204 | 1.1 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 2.133 | 1.9 |
| 404 | 1 | 80 | 562 | 9.145 | 1.6 | 6.271 | 1.1 | 3.673 | 0.7 | | | 11.681 | 2.1 |
| 404 | 2 | 80 | 747 | 12.298 | 1.6 | 7.388 | 1.0 | 5.236 | 0.7 | | | 15.272 | 2.0 |
| 404 | 3 | 80 | 1021 | 16.929 | 1.7 | 7.893 | 0.8 | 3.941 | 0.4 | | | 19.090 | 1.9 |
| 404 | 4 | 80 | 254 | 3.362 | 1.3 | 5.261 | 2.1 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 6.243 | 2.5 |
| 404 | 5 | 80 | 110 | 1.419 | 1.3 | 0.935 | 0.9 | 0.222 | 0.2 | | | 1.714 | 1.6 |
| 426 | 1 | 80 | 565 | 7.305 | 1.3 | 3.298 | 0.6 | 6.510 | 1.2 | | | 10.326 | 1.8 |
| 426 | 2 | 80 | 752 | 12.748 | 1.7 | 6.718 | 0.9 | 3.415 | 0.5 | | | 14.808 | 2.0 |
| 426 | 3 | 80 | 1025 | 18.465 | 1.8 | 12.045 | 1.2 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 22.046 | 2.2 |
| 426 | 4 | 80 | 262 | 5.527 | 2.1 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 2.157 | 0.8 | | | 5.933 | 2.3 |
| 426 | 5 | 80 | 113 | 1.265 | 1.1 | 1.378 | 1.2 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 1.871 | 1.7 |
| All<br>instruments<br>combined | 1 | 240 | 560 | 8.221 | 1.5 | 5.282 | 0.9 | 4.104 | 0.7 | 6.208 | 1.1 | 12.283 | 2.2 |
| All<br>instruments<br>combined | 2 | 240 | 745 | 11.893 | 1.6 | 7.442 | 1.0 | 3.140 | 0.4 | 8.405 | 1.1 | 16.653 | 2.2 |
| All<br>instruments<br>combined | 3 | 240 | 1013 | 18.689 | 1.8 | 7.642 | 0.8 | 1.630 | 0.2 | 17.832 | 1.8 | 26.987 | 2.7 |
| All<br>instruments<br>combined | 4 | 240 | 256 | 4.719 | 1.8 | 3.237 | 1.3 | 0.521 | 0.2 | 2.167 | 0.8 | 7.728 | 3.0 |
| All<br>instruments<br>combined | 5 | 240 | 111 | 1.501 | 1.4 | 1.189 | 1.1 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 1.556 | 1.4 | 2.467 | 2.2 |
### AT (STA-Stachrom ATIII (6 (%))
| Analyzer | Sample | N | Mean<br>% | SD | CV(%) | SD | CV(%) | SD | CV(%) | SD | CV(%) | SD | CV(%) |
|--------------------------------|--------|-----|-----------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
| 403 | 1 | 80 | 31 | 1.251 | 4.0 | 1.332 | 4.3 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 1.828 | 5.9 |
| 403 | 2 | 80 | 71 | 1.043 | 1.5 | 2.234 | 3.1 | 0.000 | 0.0 | | | 2.466 | 3.5 |
| 403…
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.