A retrospective, multi-center clinical study was conducted to validate the performance of the vMap system by analyzing 225 patients (255 arrhythmia/pacing episodes) from routine clinical practice to confirm accuracy across supported arrhythmia types.
Retrospective, blinded, and multi-center clinical study; Retrospective, blinded, multi-center study
Patients undergoing EP procedures with various arrhythmia/pacing subtypes, including those with and without structural heart disease.; Sample Size: 225 patients (255 arrhythmia/pacing episodes); Number of Sites: 4
Not applicable for this study
Accuracy of identifying chamber/region of clinical arrhythmia (CAT) location compared to ground truth.
Indications for Use
The Vektor Computational ECG Mapping System (vMap™) is intended for the analysis, display, and storage of cardiac electrophysiological data and maps for analysis by a physician.
Device Story
vMap™ is a non-invasive, software-driven tool for beat-by-beat, multi-chamber 2D and 3D cardiac mapping. Input: standard 12-lead surface ECG signals. Transformation: system uses proprietary algorithms and a pre-computed 'RhythmMatrix' cardiac voltage library (containing >1 million simulated activation source locations and corresponding vectorcardiograms) to transform surface signals into cardiac electrical features. Output: 2D electrogram displays and interactive 3D color activation heatmaps (individual-beat, composite, beat-averaged). Usage: clinical/hospital environments (e.g., EP lab) by physicians. The system facilitates assessment of abnormal heart rhythms by providing visual maps of cardiac electrical activity. Benefits: assists physicians in identifying clinical arrhythmia (CAT) locations, potentially aiding in procedure planning and decision-making.
Clinical Evidence
Retrospective, blinded, multi-center study of 225 patients (255 arrhythmia/pacing episodes). Primary endpoint: accuracy in identifying chamber/region of clinical arrhythmia (CAT) in PVC/VT cases with structurally normal hearts (<10% scar). Results: 98.7% accuracy (96.0-100% CI) for primary endpoint (74/75 episodes). Secondary endpoints: 96.9% accuracy (95.1-98.7% CI) for CAT location across all nine supported arrhythmia subtypes; 97.3% accuracy (95.2-99.3% CI) for CAT location segment/neighboring segment.
Technological Characteristics
System includes computer workstation, software, and 'Mapping Key' license. Inputs: 12-lead surface ECG. Processing: computational modeling using pre-computed cardiac voltage library (RhythmMatrix). Output: 3D activation heatmaps. Connectivity: standalone workstation. Standards: IEC 60601 series (electrical/EMC), ISTA 3A:2018 (shipping), IEC 62366-1:2015 (usability).
Indications for Use
Indicated for individuals undergoing electrophysiology (EP) procedures for the analysis, display, and storage of cardiac electrophysiological data and maps. Supports nine arrhythmia and pacing types in patients with and without structural heart disease.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A programmable diagnostic computer is a device that can be programmed to compute various physiologic or blood flow parameters based on the output from one or more electrodes, transducers, or measuring devices; this device includes any associated commercially supplied programs.
Medtronic, Inc. CardioInsight® Cardiac Mapping System (K181918)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is in blue and includes the letters "FDA" followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" stacked on top of each other.
November 9, 2021
Vektor Medical, Inc. % Michael Billig Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer Experien Group, LLC 224 Airport Parkway, Suite 250 San Jose. California 95110
Re: K211546
Trade/Device Name: Vektor Computational ECG Mapping System (vMap™) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1425 Regulation Name: Programmable Diagnostic Computer Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DOK Dated: May 18, 2021 Received: May 19, 2021
Dear Michael Billig:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Aneesh Deoras Assistant Director Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Diagnostics and Monitoring Devices Office of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K211546
Device Name
Vektor Computational ECG Mapping System (vMap™)
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Vektor Computational ECG Mapping System (vMap™) is intended for the analysis, display, and storage of cardiac electrophysiological data and maps for analysis by a physician.
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Notification K211546
## GENERAL INFORMATION [807.92(a)(1)]
#### Applicant:
Vektor Medical, Inc. 7875 Sitio Abeto Carlsbad, CA, 92009 Phone: 800-610-8587
### Sponsor Contact Person:
Mike Monko Chief Executive Officer, Vektor Medical, Inc. Vektor Medical, Inc. 7875 Sitio Abeto Carlsbad, CA, 92009
### Application Correspondent:
Michael J. Billig Regulatory Consultant to Vektor Medical, Inc. Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Experien Group, LLC Now a Part of Veranex 224 Airport Parkway, Suite 250 San Jose, CA, 95110
### Date Prepared: November 8, 2021
### DEVICE INFORMATION [807.92(a)(2)]
#### Trade Name:
Vektor Computational ECG Mapping System (vMap")
### Generic/Common Name:
Electrophysiological cardiac mapping system
### Classification:
21 CFR§870.1425. Programmable Diagnostic Computer, Class II
### Product Code:
DOK, Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable
{4}------------------------------------------------
## PREDICATE DEVICE(S) [807.92(a)(3)]
Primary Predicate Device: Volta Medical VX1 (K201298)
Secondary Predicate Device: Medtronic. Inc. CardioInsight® Cardiac Mapping System (K181918)
### DEVICE DESCRIPTION [807.92(a)(4)]
The Vektor Computational ECG Mapping System (vMap™) is a non-invasive software-driven tool for beat-by-beat, multi-chamber, two-dimensional ("2D") and three-dimensional ("3D") analysis and mapping of the heart. vMap" analyzes standard, 12-lead electrocardiographic signals acquired non-invasively from the body surface. vMap™ uses this data to provide various 2D cardiac information and interactive 3D color maps, including cardiac electrical features for analysis by a physician. vMap™ can be used in the clinical environment, such as the electrophysiology ("EP") lab, and in a hospital environment.
The vMap™ System consists of three key components:
- 1. The vMap™ Software, which drives vMap™ and its core analysis functionalities;
- 2. The vMap™ Hardware, the computer workstation which facilitates the use of the vMap™ Software; and
- 3. The vMap™ Disposables, which includes a "Mapping Key" that serves as a license mechanism for the software. Commercial off-the-shelf components such as a USB flash drive and a set of FDA-cleared ECG leads are provided for the physician's convenience.
The electrocardiogram (ECG) signals are displayed and used in proprietary algorithms to transform the measured body surface signals into cardiac signals. vMap™ provides information directly to the physician to help assess patients exhibiting abnormal heart rhythmias). vMap" provides this information by analyzing electrocardiographic information with reference to an arrhythmia-specific cardiac voltage library.
### INDICATIONS FOR USE [807.92(a)(5)]
The Vektor Computational ECG Mapping System (vMap") is intended for the analysis, display, and storage of cardiac electrophysiological data and maps for analysis by a physician.
### COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICES [807.92(a)(6)]
The proposed device and the predicate devices have intended use and similar Indications for Use. All devices are non-invasive cardiac mapping systems for use by licensed physicians on patients undergoing electrophysiology ("EP") procedures. vMap™, VX1, and CardioInsight® all perform analysis, display, and storage of EP data and maps for analysis by a physician.
The proposed and predicate devices share key technological similarities. In order to process the device signal input and provide output, all devices analyze cardiac electrogram data in order to generate electrical activity "maps" indicative of cardiac electrical activity within the heart anatomy for physician analysis. In consideration of the specific analysis methodology, vMap™
{5}------------------------------------------------
and CardioInsight utilize electrical activity information gathered from surface-lead inputs to estimate the origins of the measured electrical activity. In this analysis, both devices consider the patient's cardiac anatomy to arrive at the mapping result. Further, vMap™ and VX1 also leverage analytical parameters from externally developed models as part of the analysis to relate the input source signals to the final geometric output. There are a few differences between the proposed device and the predicate devices which relate primarily to input signals, mathematical approach, and output map formats, which do not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness, as was further confirmed through the results of bench, usability, and clinical performance testing.
Table 1 presents a tabular comparison of technological characteristics between the proposed device and predicate devices.
{6}------------------------------------------------
# Table 1: Substantial Equivalence Table
| Feature | Proposed Device<br>Vektor Medical, Inc. - Vektor<br>Computational ECG Mapping<br>System (vMap™) (K211546) | Primary Predicate Device<br>Volta Medical – VX1<br>(K201298) | Secondary Predicate Device<br>Medtronic Inc. – CardioInsight®<br>Cardiac Mapping System<br>(K181918) | |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Classification | 21 CFR§870.1425, Programmable<br>Diagnostic Computer | 21 CFR§870.1425, Programmable<br>Diagnostic Computer | 21 CFR§870.1425, Programmable<br>Diagnostic Computer | |
| Product Code | DQK, Computer, Diagnostic,<br>Programmable | DQK, Computer, Diagnostic,<br>Programmable | DQK, Computer, Diagnostic,<br>Programmable | |
| Intended Use/Indications for Use | | | | |
| Indications for Use | The Vektor Computational ECG<br>Mapping System (vMap™) is<br>intended for the analysis, display, and<br>storage of cardiac<br>electrophysiological data and maps<br>for analysis by a physician. | The VX1 assists operators in the<br>real-time manual annotation of 3D<br>anatomical and electrical maps of<br>human atria for the presence of<br>multipolar intra-cardiac atrial<br>electrograms exhibiting<br>spatiotemporal dispersion during<br>atrial fibrillation or atrial<br>tachycardia.<br>The clinical significance of utilizing<br>the VX1 software to help identify<br>areas with intra-cardiac atrial<br>electrograms exhibiting<br>spatiotemporal dispersion for<br>catheter ablation of atrial<br>arrhythmias, such as atrial<br>fibrillation, has not been established<br>by clinical investigations. | The CardioInsight Cardiac Mapping<br>System is intended for acquisition,<br>analysis, display and storage of<br>cardiac electrophysiological data<br>and maps for analysis by a<br>physician. | |
| Intended Use Population | Individuals undergoing EP<br>procedures | Individuals undergoing EP<br>procedures | Individual undergoing EP procedure | |
| Intended Use Environment | Clinical and hospital environment | Clinical and hospital environments | Clinical and hospital environment | |
| Prescription/Over-the-Counter | Rx | Rx | Rx | |
| | Feature | Proposed Device<br>Vektor Medical, Inc. - Vektor<br>Computational ECG Mapping<br>System (vMap™) (K211546) | Primary Predicate Device<br>Volta Medical – VX1<br>(K201298) | Secondary Predicate Device<br>Medtronic Inc. – CardioInsight®<br>Cardiac Mapping System<br>(K181918) |
| Mapping<br>Display | Principal Mapping<br>Approach | Displays 3D anatomical maps after<br>analyzing surface electrograms and<br>patient phenotype using signal<br>processing and computational<br>modeling techniques. | Displays adjudications as visual cues<br>after analyzing intra-cardiac atrial<br>electrograms in real-time using<br>signal processing, and deep and<br>machine learning techniques. | Displays 3D anatomical maps after<br>analyzing surface electrograms and<br>imaging information using signal<br>processing techniques. |
| | Cardiac Model Used | Standard, idealized model | N/A; the locations are displayed<br>relative to the mapping catheter<br>electrodes. | Individualized, patient-specific<br>model based on segmented CT<br>image |
| | Cardiac Maps Provided | 3D Activation Heatmap:<br>• Individual-beat<br>• Composite beat<br>• Beat-averaged summary<br>• Custom Beat | Real-time Dispersed Electrogram<br>(DE) subtype of multipolar<br>electrogram map- The operator is<br>provided with display of the<br>electrode locations where dispersed<br>or non-dispersed electrograms have<br>been recorded during atrial<br>fibrillation or atrial tachycardia. | 3D Electroanatomical Maps:<br>• Phase Map<br>• Potential Map<br>• Voltage Map<br>• Activation Maps (Activation<br>Time, Directional Activation,<br>Slew Rate, Propagation) |
| | Software-Driven<br>Analysis | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Principles<br>of<br>Operation | Display | • 2D electrogram signals display<br>• Beat-by-beat comparison<br>"mosaic" display<br>• 3D beat and composite maps | • 2D electrogram signals display<br>• Dispersion Location<br>• Mapping Catheter<br>• Estimated Reference Cycle<br>Length<br>• Mapping Cycle Length | • 2D electrogram signals display<br>• "Premature Beats" filter<br>• 3D beat and composite maps |
| | Reports of Diagnostic<br>Results | No | No | No |
| | Electrophysiological<br>Input | Patient-specific surface ECG (12-<br>lead, acquired by compatible and<br>cleared ECG devices) | Patient-specific intracardiac<br>electrogram information (acquired<br>by compatible catheter) | Patient-specific surface ECG<br>(proprietary, acquired by device<br>vest) |
{7}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) SUMMARY (K211546)
# Table 1: Substantial Equivalence Table (cont.)
{8}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) SUMMARY (K211546)
| | | | Table 1: Substantial Equivalence Table (cont.) | | |
|--|--|--|------------------------------------------------|--|--|
|--|--|--|------------------------------------------------|--|--|
| Table 1. Substantial Equivalence Table (cont.) | | | | |
|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Feature | Proposed Device<br>Vektor Medical, Inc. - Vektor<br>Computational ECG Mapping<br>System (vMap™) (K211546) | Primary Predicate Device<br>Volta Medical – VX1<br>(K201298) | Secondary Predicate Device<br>Medtronic Inc. – CardioInsight®<br>Cardiac Mapping System<br>(K181918) |
| | Considers Disease<br>Phenotype | Yes, through end user input and pre-<br>computed cardiac voltage library. | Disease phenotype information is<br>reflected within mapping catheter<br>readings.<br>The deep learning model within the<br>device was developed using<br>electrograms recorded across a<br>representative range of clinical<br>disease phenotypes, such that the<br>algorithm can be generalized<br>accordingly. | Yes, through CT scans. |
| | Mathematical<br>Methodology | The system leverages a pre-computed<br>cardiac voltage library which uses<br>forward models and mathematical<br>algorithms to derive cardiac signals<br>from body surface signals. | The device leverages a machine<br>learning/deep learning algorithm that<br>includes analytical parameters that<br>pertain to previous similar<br>procedures to analyze electrograms<br>and identify the associated mapping<br>outputs (locations associated with<br>dispersion/fractionation). | The system uses the inverse solution<br>and mathematical algorithms to<br>transform the measured body surface<br>signals into cardiac signals. |
| | Method for<br>Establishing Analytical<br>Parameters | RhythmMatrix – a collection of over<br>one million precomputed cardiac<br>voltage library solutions. Each pre-<br>computed solution includes a<br>simulated cardiac activation source<br>location and its corresponding<br>vectorcardiogram. | The training set of the deep learning<br>algorithm consists of a "very large<br>database of 1.5 second snippets of<br>multipolar intra-cardiac atrial<br>electrograms." | Mathematical-based inverse analysis<br>is based on individual patient<br>information only. |
| | System Components | Computer Workstation (monitor,<br>main control unit, peripherals,<br>and cords) Software/Firmware/Algorithm Off-the-shelf (OTS) ECG (not<br>provided) and ECG electrodes<br>(12-Lead) (optional) | Computer Workstation Software/Firmware/Algorithm Off-the-shelf (OTS) mapping<br>catheters (not provided). | Computer Workstation<br>(monitor, core<br>processor/isolation transformer,<br>peripherals, and cabling) and<br>Cart Software/Firmware/Algorithm Vest with Sensor Array |
| Feature | Proposed Device<br>Vektor Medical, Inc. - Vektor<br>Computational ECG Mapping<br>System (vMap™) (K211546) | Primary Predicate Device<br>Volta Medical – VX1<br>(K201298) | Secondary Predicate Device<br>Medtronic Inc. - CardioInsight®<br>Cardiac Mapping System<br>(K181918) | |
| Operational Workflow | Creates patient records Acquires ECG input (from FDA-cleared ECG acquisition devices) Analyzes electrocardiographic signals Creates and reviews maps | Creates patient records Acquires electrogram input (from compatible FDA-cleared mapping catheters) Analyzes electrocardiographic signals and derives mapping outputs for real-time review | Creates patient records Segments heart and vest electrodes Analyzes electrocardiographic signals Creates and reviews maps | |
{9}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) SUMMARY (K211546)
Table 1: Substantial Equivalence Table (cont.)
{10}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) SUMMARY (CONT.)
### PERFORMANCE DATA [807.92(b)]
All necessary bench, usability, and clinical testing were conducted on vMap™ to support a determination of substantial equivalence to the predicate device.
### [807.92(b)(1)] Nonclinical Testing Summary:
The nonclinical, bench testing included:
- Shipping and packaging validation, in accordance with ISTA 3A:2018, Packaged-Products for Parcel Delivery System Shipment 70 kg (150 lb) or Less.
- . Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility testing in accordance with the applicable IEC 60601 series consensus standards as well as the recommendations of FDA's Guidance Document entitled, "Information to Support a Claim of Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) of Electrically-Powered Medical Devices, " issued July 11, 2016.
- Software verification and validation completed in alignment with FDA Guidance ● Document entitled, "General Principles of Software Validation," issued January 11, 2002.
- Documentation, verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification of the Device's . arrhythmia-specific cardiac voltage libraries in accordance with FDA's Guidance Document entitled, "Reporting of Computational Modeling Studies in Medical Device Submissions," issued September 21, 2016.
- Human factors usability testing, conducted in accordance with FDA's Guidance . Document entitled, "Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices," issued February 03, 2016 and IEC 62366-1:2015, Medical devices - Part 1: Application of usability engineering to medical devices.
The collective results of bench and usability testing, in conjunction with the multi-center clinical study of vMap", demonstrate that the proposed device meets all design specifications and performs as intended for its intended use.
### [807.92(b)(2)] Clinical Testing Summarv:
A retrospective, blinded, and multi-center clinical study was conducted to validate performance of vMap". The outcomes of this clinical study validated the performance of vMap"" by confirming that the Device, when used by the intended user in the intended use patient population, was able to provide information accurately across all nine supported arrhythmia and pacing types and in patients with and without structural heart disease. The results support that the vMap" output substantiates vMap""s intended use/Indications for Use for "the analysis, display, and storage of cardiac electrophysiological data and maps for analysis by a physician."
Four investigational sites within the United States were identified and selected based on qualifying criteria. Across these four sites, the study retrospectively enrolled 225 patients associated with 255 arrhythmia/pacing episodes. Of the 225 subjects, 61.3% of the subjects were male, with a representative range of ages. The study subjects were representative of the intended user patient population, and the ECG episodes collected included all arrhythmia/pacing subtypes supported by vMap".
{11}------------------------------------------------
### 510(k) SUMMARY (CONT.)
The study results demonstrated acceptable clinical accuracy performance of vMap". The primary endpoint of the study was achieved. Of 75 episodes, which met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis, (premature ventricular complex (PVC) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) arrhythmias in cases with structurally normal hearts and less than 10% scar), vMap correctly identified chamber/region of the clinical arrhythmia ("CAT") location as determined by ground truth in 74 episodes, representing an accuracy of 98.7% (96.0 - 100%).
In addition, both key secondary endpoints were achieved, as follows:
- 1. Of 255 total episodes, vMap™ correctly identified the chamber/region of the CAT location as determined by ground truth (Atria: left atrial free wall, septum, or right atrial free wall; Ventricles: left ventricular free wall, septum, or right ventricular free wall) with an accuracy of 96.9% (95.1% - 98.7%) across all nine arrhythmia subtypes supported by vMap"".
- 2. Of 255 total episodes, vMap" correctly identified the segment or neighboring segment of the CAT location as determined by ground truth with an accuracy of 97.3% (95.2% -99.3%) across all nine arrhythmia subtypes supported by vMap
### CONCLUSIONS [807.92(b)(3)]
The proposed device and the predicate devices have intended use and similar Indications for Use. Furthermore, the proposed and predicate devices share key technological similarities. Demonstrated by the results of bench, usability, and clinical testing, the design of which were highly similar to that of the predicate devices, any technological differences presented with the proposed device do not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness, and the proposed device is as safe and as effective as the predicate devices for the same intended use.
#### SUMMARY
The predicate device's Indications for Use is substantially equivalent to the proposed Indications for Use for vMap". Any differences in the technological characteristics between the devices do not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness. Thus, the Vektor Computational ECG Mapping System (vMap") is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices, the Volta Medical VX1 (K201298) and the Medtronic, Inc. CardioInsight® Cardiac Mapping System (K181918).
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.