The Purism Non-sterile Powder Free Nitrile Examination Gloves is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.
Device Story
Disposable, non-sterile, powder-free nitrile examination gloves; ambidextrous; blue color; available in S, M, L, XL sizes. Used in clinical settings by healthcare providers to serve as a protective barrier; prevents contamination between patient and examiner. Device functions as a physical barrier; no active components or software. Benefits include protection against cross-contamination during medical examinations.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Performance verified via ASTM D6319-19 (physical properties, dimensions), ASTM D5151-19 (freedom from holes, AQL 1.5), and ASTM D6124-06 (residual powder). Biocompatibility testing performed per ISO 10993-10:2010 (irritation, sensitization) and ISO 10993-11:2017 (acute systemic toxicity).
Technological Characteristics
Nitrile compound; non-sterile; powder-free; ambidextrous; blue. Dimensions and physical properties comply with ASTM D6319-19. Freedom from holes meets ASTM D5151-19. Residual powder meets ASTM D6124-06. Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-5, 10, and 11.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use as a disposable medical glove worn on the examiner's hand to prevent cross-contamination between patient and examiner.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A non-powdered patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. A non-powdered patient examination glove does not incorporate powder for purposes other than manufacturing. The final finished glove includes only residual powder from manufacturing.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the FDA logo is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
August 19, 2021
Dezhou Purism Medical Technology Co., Ltd. % Natalya Valerio Consultant mdi Consultants, Inc. 55 Northern Blvd., Suite 201 Great Neck. New York 11021
Re: K211319
Trade/Device Name: Purism Non-Sterile Powder Free Nitrile Examination Gloves Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.6250 Regulation Name: Non-Powdered Patient Examination Glove Regulatory Class: Class I, reserved Product Code: LZA Dated: July 14, 2021 Received: July 16, 2021
Dear Natalya Valerio:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
For Clarence W. Murray, III, PhD Assistant Director DHT4B: Division of Infection Control and Plastic Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K211319
Device Name
Purism Non-sterile Powder Free Nitrile Examination Gloves
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Purism Non-sterile Powder Free Nitrile Examination Gloves is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
X Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) SUMMARY
The assigned 510(k) number is: K211319
Date Summary Prepared: August 3, 2021
### 1. Submitter's Identification:
Dezhou Purism Medical Technology Co., Ltd. High-end Equipment Manufacturing Park, Minsheng North Road, Economic Development Zone, Pingyuan County, Dezhou City, Shandong Province, 253100 China Tel: +86 15662735157 Contact Person: Mengqi Yang
### 2. Name of the Device:
Device Trade Name: Purism Non-sterile Powder Free Nitrile Examination Gloves
### 3. Requlatory Information:
| Regulation Name: | Non-Powdered Patient Examination Glove |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Regulatory Class: | Class I, reserved |
| Product Code: | LZA |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 880.6250 |
| Panel: | General Hospital |
### 4. Predicate Device Information:
| 510(k) #: | K210057 |
|---------------|----------------------------------------|
| Device: | Blue Nitrile Exam Glove, Powder Free |
| Manufacturer: | Real Star Medical Technology Co., Ltd. |
### 5. Device Description:
The Purism Non-sterile Powder Free Nitrile Examination Gloves are a non-sterile, powder free, single use, disposable item. The gloves are made from nitrile compound and are blue in color. The gloves are ambidextrous and offered in Small, Medium, Large and X-Large sizes.
{4}------------------------------------------------
## 6. Indications for Use:
The Purism Non-sterile Powder Free Nitrile Examination Gloves is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.
# Z Technological Comparison to the 510(k) Cleared Predicate Device:
| COMPARISON<br>CRITERIA | NEW DEVICE<br>510(K) # K211319 | PREDICATE DEVICE<br>510(K) # K210057 | COMPARISON<br>RESULT |
|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
| Device Name | Purism Non-sterile Powder<br>Free Nitrile Examination<br>Gloves | Blue Nitrile Exam Glove,<br>Powder Free | N/A |
| Manufacturer | Dezhou Purism Medical<br>Technology Co., Ltd. | Real Star Medical<br>Technology Co., Ltd. | N/A |
| Product Code | LZA | LZA | Same |
| Classification | Class 1 | Class 1 | Same |
| Regulation No. | 21 CFR 880.6250 | 21 CFR 880.6250 | Same |
| Indications for<br>Use | The Purism Non-sterile<br>Powder Free Nitrile<br>Examination Gloves is a<br>disposable device intended<br>for medical purposes that is<br>worn on the examiner's<br>hand to prevent<br>contamination between<br>patient and examiner. | The Blue Nitrile Exam<br>Glove, Powder Free is a<br>non-sterile disposable<br>device intended for medical<br>purposes that is worn on the<br>examiner's hands or finger<br>to prevent contamination<br>between patient and<br>examiner. | Same |
| Sterile or Non-<br>Sterile | Non-Sterile | Non-Sterile | Same |
| Reusable or<br>Disposable<br>(Single Use) | Disposable (Singe Use) | Disposable (Single Use) | Same |
| Design | Ambidextrous | Ambidextrous | Same |
| Material of<br>Construction | Nitrile compound | Nitrile compound | Same |
| Size | S, M, L, XL | S, M, L, XL | Same |
| Color | Blue | Blue | Same |
#### Table 1: Comparison to Predicate Device
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Powdered or<br>Powder Free | Powder Free | | Powder Free | | Same | | |
|---------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|---------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Glove<br>Thickness | Size | Finger<br>(mm) | Palm<br>(mm) | Size | Finger<br>(mm) | Palm<br>(mm) | Similar<br>Both devices |
| | S | $0.10\pm0.02$ | $0.06\pm0.02$ | S | $0.08\pm0.03$ | $0.08\pm0.03$ | are within |
| | M | $0.10\pm0.02$ | $0.06\pm0.02$ | M | $0.08\pm0.03$ | $0.08\pm0.03$ | ASTM D6319-<br>19 |
| | L | $0.10\pm0.02$ | $0.06\pm0.02$ | L | $0.08\pm0.03$ | $0.08\pm0.03$ | specifications |
| | XL | $0.10\pm0.02$ | $0.06\pm0.02$ | XL | $0.08\pm0.03$ | $0.08\pm0.03$ | |
| Glove<br>Dimensions | Size | Min<br>Length<br>(mm) | Palm<br>Width<br>(mm) | Size | Min<br>Length<br>(mm) | Width<br>(mm) | Similar<br>Both devices<br>are within<br>ASTM D6319- |
| | S | 230 | $80\pm10$ | S | 230 | $80\pm10$ | 19 |
| | M | 230 | $95\pm10$ | M | 230 | $95\pm10$ | specifications |
| | L | 230 | $110\pm10$ | L | 230 | $110\pm10$ | |
| | XL | 230 | $\ge110$ | XL | 230 | $120\pm10$ | |
| Performance Testing | | | | | | | |
| ASTM D6319-<br>19<br>Physical<br>Properties | Before Ageing<br>Tensile Strength<br>min 14 MPa<br>Ultimate Elongation<br>min 500%<br>After Ageing | | | Before Ageing<br>Tensile Strength<br>min 14 MPa<br>Ultimate Elongation<br>min 500%<br>After Ageing | | | Same |
| | Tensile Strength<br>min 14 MPa<br>Ultimate Elongation<br>min 400% | | | Tensile Strength<br>min 14 MPa<br>Ultimate Elongation<br>min 400% | | | |
| ASTM D5151-<br>19<br>Freedom from<br>Holes | Passed at AQL 1.5 | | | Passed at AQL 2.5 | | | Similar<br>Both devices<br>are within<br>ASTM D5151-<br>19<br>requirements |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| ASTM D6124-<br>06<br>Residual<br>Powder | ≤2 mg/glove | ≤2 mg/glove | Same<br>Both devices<br>are within<br>ASTM D6124-<br>requirements | |
|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|
| ISO 10993<br>Biocompatibility | Primary Skin<br>Irritation<br>ISO 10993-<br>10:2010 | Under the<br>conditions of<br>study not an<br>Irritant | Under the conditions of<br>study not an irritant | Same |
| | Dermal<br>Sensitization<br>ISO 10993-<br>10:2010 | Under the<br>conditions of<br>study not a<br>Sensitizer | Under the conditions of<br>study not a sensitizer | Same |
| | In vitro<br>Cytotoxicity<br>ISO 10993-<br>5:2009 | Under the<br>conditions of<br>Study<br>Cytotoxic | Under the conditions of<br>study non-cytotoxic | Different |
| | Acute<br>Systemic<br>Toxicity<br>ISO 10993-<br>11:2017 | Under the<br>conditions of<br>study did not<br>Show<br>Systemic<br>Toxicity | No data available | N/A |
Both the Purism Non-sterile Powder Free Nitrile Examination Gloves and predicate Blue Nitrile Exam Glove, Powder Free are disposable, single use, non-sterile, powder free gloves intended for medical purposes to be worn on the examiner's hand to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.
Both gloves are similar in color, design and sizes. Both gloves are made of nitrile compound.
The only difference was in cytotoxicity test results where the Purism Non-sterile Powder Free Nitrile Examination Gloves showed cytotoxic properties under the conditions of the study. However, additional acute systemic toxicity testing performed under the ISO 10993-11:2017 supported the subject device was not systemically toxic. The results of primary skin irritation and dermal sensitization tests under the ISO 10993-10:2010 standard indicated the subject device was not an irritant or skin sensitizer.
{7}------------------------------------------------
## & Summary of Non-Clinical Tests Performed:
The non-clinical performance testing completed for the Purism Non-sterile Powder Free Nitrile Examination Gloves demonstrated that the subject device met the acceptance criteria or specification for the applicable test methodology or standard as shown below.
| Test Method | Purpose | Acceptance Criteria | Results |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ASTM D6319-19<br>Standard<br>Specification for<br>Nitrile Examination<br>Gloves for Medical<br>Application | To determine glove<br>length | Min Length<br>(mm) | Avg Min Length<br>(mm) |
| | | Size S: 230 | Size S: 236 (Pass) |
| | | Size M: 230 | Size M: 239 (Pass) |
| | | Size L: 230<br>Size XL: 230 | Size L: 241 (Pass)<br>Size XL: 238 (Pass) |
| | To determine glove<br>palm width | Palm Width<br>(mm) | Avg Palm Width<br>(mm) |
| | | Size S: 80±10 | Size S: 84 (Pass) |
| | | Size M: 95±10 | Size M: 95 (Pass) |
| | | Size L: 110±10<br>Size XL: ≥110 | Size L: 103 (Pass)<br>Size XL: 111 (Pass) |
| | To determine glove<br>finger thickness | Finger Thickness<br>(mm) | Avg Finger<br>Thickness<br>(mm) |
| | | Size S: 0.100±0.02 | Size S: 0.096 (Pass) |
| | | Size M: 0.100±0.02 | Size M: 0.111 (Pass) |
| | | Size L: 0.100±0.02<br>Size XL: 0.100±0.02 | Size L: 0.108 (Pass)<br>Size XL: 0.111 (Pass) |
| | To determine glove<br>palm thickness | Palm Thickness<br>(mm) | Avg Palm Thickness<br>(mm) |
| | | Size S: 0.060±0.02 | Size S: 0.058 (Pass) |
| | | Size M: 0.060±0.02 | Size M: 0.066 (Pass) |
| | | Size L: 0.060±0.02<br>Size XL: 0.060±0.02 | Size L: 0.074 (Pass)<br>Size XL: 0.080 (Pass) |
| ASTM D6319-19<br>Standard<br>Specification for<br>Nitrile Examination<br>Gloves for Medical<br>Application | To determine glove<br>physical properties<br>before and after<br>ageing | Before Ageing<br>Tensile Strength<br>min 14 MPa<br>Ultimate Elongation<br>min 500% | Before Ageing<br>Tensile Strength<br>min 18.0 MPa (Pass)<br>Ultimate Elongation<br>min 694% (Pass) |
| | | After Ageing | After Ageing |
| | | Tensile Strength<br>min 14 MPa | Tensile Strength<br>min 18.2 MPa (Pass) |
| | | Ultimate Elongation<br>min 400% | Ultimate Elongation<br>min 664% (Pass) |
| ASTM D5151-19<br>Standard Test<br>Method for Detection<br>of Holes in Medical<br>Gloves | To detect holes and<br>check for water<br>leaks | As per ISO 2859-1.<br>GI Level II,<br>Lot Size 3000,<br>Sample Size 125,<br>AQL 1.5, Ac=5, Re=6 | Pass at AQL 1.5 |
| ASTM D6124<br>Standard Test<br>Method for Residual<br>Powder on Medical<br>Gloves | To determine<br>residual powder | ≤2 mg/glove | 0.06 mg/glove (Pass) |
### Table 2: Non-Clinical Tests
{8}------------------------------------------------
#### Table 3: Biocompatibility Tests
| Test Method | Purpose | Acceptance Criteria | Results |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Primary Skin<br>Irritation<br>ISO 10993-10:2010 | To determine if<br>device is a skin<br>irritant | The device must be a<br>non-irritant | Under the study<br>conditions not an<br>irritant |
| Dermal Sensitization<br>ISO 10993-10:2010 | To determine if<br>device is a dermal<br>sensitizer | The device must be a<br>non-sensitizer | Under the study<br>conditions not a<br>sensitizer |
| In vitro Cytotoxicity<br>ISO 10993-5:2009 | To determine if<br>device extract is<br>cytotoxic | The device must be<br>non-cytotoxic | Under the study<br>conditions cytotoxic |
| Acute Systemic<br>Toxicity<br>ISO 10993-11:2017 | To determine if<br>device induces<br>systemic toxicity | The device must not<br>induce systemic<br>toxicity | Under the study<br>conditions did not<br>induce systemic<br>toxicity |
#### 9. Discussion of Clinical Tests Performed:
Clinical data are not required for marketing clearance of patient examination gloves.
### 10. Conclusion:
The conclusion drawn from the nonclinical tests demonstrates that the subject device in 510(k) submission K211319, Purism Non-sterile Powder Free Nitrile Examination Gloves, is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as or better than the legally marketed predicate device cleared under K210057.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.