FLC Kappa, FLC Lambda, FLC Control Level 1, FLC Control Level 2
K210623 · Sebia · DFH · Nov 18, 2022 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K210623
Device Name
FLC Kappa, FLC Lambda, FLC Control Level 1, FLC Control Level 2
Applicant
Sebia
Product Code
DFH · Immunology
Decision Date
Nov 18, 2022
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5550
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The FLC Kappa kit is intended for the quantification of Kappa free light chains in human serum from adults with an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) procedure. Measurement of free light chains aids in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis. It must be used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use. The FLC Lambda kit is intended for the quantification of Lambda free light chains in human serum from adults with an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) procedure. Measurement of free light chains aids in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis. It must be used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use.
Device Story
The FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda kits are ELISA-based in vitro diagnostic assays for quantifying free light chains in human serum. The device uses a sandwich ELISA format: patient samples are incubated in microplate wells coated with specific polyclonal rabbit anti-human Kappa or Lambda free light chain capture antibodies. After washing, wells are incubated with HRP-conjugated polyclonal rabbit anti-human light chain detection antibodies. Following a second wash, a peroxidase substrate is added, and the enzymatic reaction is stopped with an acidic solution. Optical density is measured via absorbance spectrophotometry at 450 nm. Concentrations are calculated using a calibration curve generated from five calibrator levels analyzed on the same microplate. The device is intended for use by laboratory professionals to aid in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis. Results are used by clinicians alongside other diagnostic findings to inform patient management. The device provides quantitative measurements that assist in identifying abnormal light chain levels associated with these conditions.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical validation study (n=510) included patients with multiple myeloma (MM), AL amyloidosis, and non-myeloma conditions. For MM (n=366), sensitivity was 96.6% (95% CI: 94.0-99.3) and specificity was 85.1% (95% CI: 79.4-89.5). For AL amyloidosis (n=333), sensitivity was 91.0% (95% CI: 86.3-95.7) and specificity was 85.1% (95% CI: 79.4-89.5). Performance compared favorably to the predicate device.
Technological Characteristics
Sandwich ELISA utilizing polyclonal rabbit anti-human Kappa or Lambda free light chain antibodies. Detection via HRP-conjugated secondary antibody and peroxidase substrate. Readout via absorbance spectrophotometry at 450 nm. Requires external densitometer. Calibrated using five-level internal master calibrators. Reagents include microplates, dilution buffer, wash solution, PER antiserum, substrate, and stop solution. Stability: 9 months at 2-8°C.
Indications for Use
Indicated for adult patients to quantify Kappa and Lambda free light chains in human serum to aid in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis. Must be used with other clinical and laboratory findings. Prescription use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An immunoglobulin (light chain specific) immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques both kappa and lambda types of light chain portions of immunoglobulin molecules in serum, other body fluids, and tissues. In some disease states, an excess of light chains are produced by the antibody-forming cells. These free light chains, unassociated with gamma globulin molecules, can be found in a patient's body fluids and tissues. Measurement of the various amounts of the different types of light chains aids in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma (cancer of antibody-forming cells), lymphocytic neoplasms (cancer of lymphoid tissue), Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (increased production of large immunoglobulins), and connective tissue diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus.
Predicate Devices
The Binding Site Freelite® Human Kappa Free Kit for use on the Siemens BN™ II (K031016)
The Binding Site Freelite® Human Lambda Free Kit for use on the Siemens BN™ II (K031016)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K210623
B Applicant
Sebia, Inc.
C Proprietary and Established Names
FLC Kappa
FLC Lambda
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DFH
DEH | Class II | 21 CFR 866.5550 - Immunoglobulin (Light Chain Specific) Immunological Test System | IM - Immunology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
New Device
B Measurand:
Kappa (κ) Free Light Chain (FLC)
Lambda (λ) Free Light Chain (FLC)
C Type of Test:
Manual enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), quantitative
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
The FLC Kappa kit is intended for the quantification of Kappa free light chains in human serum from adults with an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) procedure. Measurement of free light chains aids in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis. It must be used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use only.
The FLC Lambda kit is intended for the quantification of Lambda free light chains in human serum from adults with an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) procedure. Measurement of free light chains aids in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis. It must be used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use only.
B Indication(s) for Use:
Same as Intended Use
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
Warning: The result of the FLC Kappa, FLC Lambda in a given specimen determined with assays and/or instrument platforms from different manufacturers can vary due to differences in assay methods and reagent specificity. The results reported by the laboratory to the physician must include the identity of the assay used. Values obtained with different assay methods cannot be used interchangeably.
D Special Instrument Requirements:
No special instrument requirements.
IV Device/System Characteristics:
A Device Description:
The FLC Kappa is comprised of the following reagents:
- Kappa microplate: coated with polyclonal rabbit anti-human kappa FLC antibody
- Dilution Buffer
- Wash Solution
- Anti-Kappa Antiserum
- Stop Solution
- Calibrators: A five level set in liquid form with target concentrations: 2.7 mg/L, 5.3 mg/L, 16 mg/L, 48 mg/L and 96 mg/L, ready to use.
K210623 - Page 2 of 15
{2}
The FLC Lambda is comprised of the following reagents:
- Lambda Microplate: coated with polyclonal rabbit anti-human lambda FLC antibody
- Dilution Buffer
- Wash Solution
- Anti-Lambda Antiserum
- Stop Solution
- Calibrators: A five level set in liquid form with target concentrations: 2.9 mg/L, 5.9 mg/L, 17.7 mg/L, 53.0 mg/L and 106.0 mg/L, ready to use.
The following materials are required but not provided in the kits:
- Densitometer for microplate reading by absorbance spectrophotometry at 450 nm.
- FLC Control Level 1 with target concentrations for Kappa: 9–25 mg/L and Lambda: 15–30 mg/L
- FLC Control Level 2 with target concentrations for Kappa and Lambda > 35 mg/L
FLC Control Level 1 and FLC Control Level 2 are intended for the quality control of SEBIA immunoenzymatic procedures and are obtained from a pool of human sera. The controls are packaged in a stabilized lyophilized form. It must be noted that the high limit of the FLC Control Level 2 must not exceed the values of the Calibrator 5. Additionally, the exact concentrations for FLC Control Level 1 and FLC control Level 2 are lot dependent.
## B Principle of Operation:
The FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda assays are intended for the quantification of FLCs in human serum from adults with an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) procedure utilizing specific anti-Kappa and anti-Lambda FLC antibodies. Kappa FLC or Lambda FLC in the sample binds to specific anti-Kappa FLC antibody or anti-Lambda FLC antibody coated on the wells of microplates. Following the washing step, the samples in wells are incubated with an anti-FLC antiserum (Kit specific) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase followed by another washing of wells to remove the excess of the conjugated antiserum. Reading of the optical density is performed by absorbance spectrophotometry at 450 nm of the colored product. Finally, the calculation of the FLC concentration of the sample is performed using a calibration curve obtained with calibrators that have been analyzed on the same microplate.
## V Substantial Equivalence Information:
### A Predicate Device Name(s):
Freelite Human Kappa And Lambda Free Kits for use on the Siemens BN II Nephelometer
### B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K031016
K210623 - Page 3 of 15
{3}
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K210623 | K031016 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | FLC Kappa
FLC Lambda | Freelite Human Kappa Free and Freelite Human Lambda Free kits for use on the Siemens BN II |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications for Use | The FLC Kappa kit is intended for the quantification of Kappa free light chains in human serum from adults with an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) procedure. Measurement of free light chains aids in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis. It must be used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use only.
The FLC Lambda kit is intended for the quantification of Lambda free light chains in human serum from adults with an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) procedure. Measurement of free light chains aids in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis. It must be used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. For In Vitro Diagnostic Use only. | Kappa: This kit is intended for the quantitation of kappa free light chains in serum and urine on the Siemens BN II. Measurement of free light chains aids in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma, lymphocytic neoplasms, Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, AL amyloidosis, light chain deposition disease and connective tissue diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
Lambda: This kit is intended for the quantitation of lambda free light chains in serum and urine on the Siemens BN II. Measurement of free light chains aids in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma, lymphocytic neoplasms, Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, AL amyloidosis, light chain deposition disease and connective tissue diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. |
| Analyte | Kappa and Lambda | Same |
| Measurement | Quantitative | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Specimen Type | Serum | Serum, Urine |
| Detection Method | ELISA | Nephelometric |
| Assay format | Manual | Automatic, on BN II instrument |
K210623 - Page 4 of 15
{4}
| Capture Antibody | Polyclonal rabbit anti-human kappa/lambda FLC coated on the well of the microplate | Polyclonal sheep anti-human kappa/lambda antibody coated onto latex particles |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Detection Antibody | Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated polyclonal rabbit anti-human kappa/lambda FLC antibody | Not Applicable |
| Analytical Measuring Interval | Kappa: 4.5–76.2 mg/L
Lambda: 3.8–66.8 mg/L | Kappa: 0.3 –190 mg/L
Lambda: 0.25 –160 mg/L |
| Reference Interval | Kappa: 6.4–17.4 mg/L
Lambda: 8.4–21.8 mg/L
Ratio: 0.46–1.51 | Kappa: 3.30–19.40 mg/L
Lambda: 5.71–26.30 mg/L
Ratio: 0.26–1.65 |
| Calibrators (number of levels) | 5-level | 1-level |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
- CLSI EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Third Edition
- CLSI EP07-A3, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry – Third Edition
- CLSI EP25-A, Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents; Approved Guideline
- CLSI EP09c 3rd Edition, Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples
- CLSI EP07-A3, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry – Third Edition
- CLSI EP6-A2, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
- CLSI EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline - Second Edition
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Within-Lab Precision:
Six samples including four serum samples (samples 1 to 4) and two controls (samples C1 and C2) were tested using the FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda kit. Each day, during the 20 days, one operator analyzed the samples (three replicates per sample) on one microplate (two runs with minimum two hours between runs) using one reagent lot (same microplate design each day), yielding a total of 120 results per sample. The standard deviation (SD) and %CV were
K210623 - Page 5 of 15
{5}
evaluated for repeatability (within-run), between-run, within-day, between-day, and within-laboratory precision. The results are summarized in the following table:
FLC Kappa
| Sample | Mean (mg/L) | Within-Run (Repetability) | | Between-Run | | Within-Day | | Between-Day | | Within-Lab Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 1 | 6.3 | 0.41 | 6.6 | 0.74 | 11.9 | 0.85 | 13.6 | 0.36 | 5.8 | 0.92 | 14.8 |
| 2 | 14.4 | 0.54 | 3.7 | 1.30 | 9.0 | 1.40 | 9.7 | 0.81 | 5.6 | 1.62 | 11.2 |
| 3 | 39.2 | 1.47 | 3.8 | 4.02 | 10.2 | 4.28 | 10.9 | 1.29 | 3.3 | 4.47 | 11.4 |
| 4 | 62.0 | 2.89 | 4.7 | 6.03 | 9.7 | 6.69 | 10.8 | 1.77 | 2.9 | 6.92 | 11.2 |
| C1 | 11.5 | 0.67 | 5.8 | 1.09 | 9.5 | 1.28 | 11.2 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 1.28 | 11.2 |
| C2 | 42.2 | 1.64 | 3.9 | 4.00 | 9.5 | 4.32 | 10.2 | 0.66 | 1.6 | 4.37 | 10.4 |
FLC Lambda
| Sample | Mean (mg/L) | Within-Run (Repetability) | | Between-Run | | Within-Day | | Between-Day | | Within-Lab Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 1 | 13.2 | 0.55 | 4.2 | 0.96 | 7.3 | 1.11 | 8.4 | 0.63 | 4.8 | 1.28 | 9.7 |
| 2 | 20.0 | 0.83 | 4.1 | 1.25 | 6.2 | 1.5 | 7.5 | 0.74 | 3.7 | 1.67 | 8.3 |
| 3 | 33.7 | 1.55 | 4.6 | 2.67 | 7.9 | 3.09 | 9.2 | 1.61 | 4.8 | 3.48 | 10.3 |
| 4 | 79.5 | 5.13 | 6.5 | 5.15 | 6.5 | 7.27 | 9.1 | 6.91 | 8.7 | 10.03 | 12.6 |
| C1 | 19.7 | 1.33 | 6.8 | 1.4 | 7.1 | 1.93 | 9.8 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 1.93 | 9.8 |
| C2 | 37.1 | 1.66 | 4.5 | 2.76 | 7.5 | 3.22 | 8.7 | 1.55 | 4.2 | 3.57 | 9.6 |
# Operator-to-Operator Variability
Six samples including four serum samples (samples 1 to 4) and two controls (samples C1 and C2) were tested using the FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda kit. Each day, during five days, three different operators analyzed the same samples (five replicates / sample) on a microplate using one reagent lot (same microplate design each day), yielding a total of 75 results per sample. The precision including operator-to-operator variance precision is summarized in the following table.
FLC Kappa
| Sample | Mean (mg/L) | Within-Day | | Between-Days | | Within-Operator | | Between-Operators | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 1 | 6.8 | 0.46 | 6.8 | 0.63 | 9.2 | 0.78 | 11.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.78 | 11.4 |
| 2 | 15.7 | 0.72 | 4.6 | 1.30 | 8.3 | 1.49 | 9.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.49 | 9.5 |
| 3 | 44.1 | 2.49 | 5.7 | 2.05 | 4.7 | 3.23 | 7.3 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 3.27 | 7.4 |
| 4 | 67.9 | 3.52 | 5.2 | 5.58 | 8.2 | 6.60 | 9.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.60 | 9.7 |
| C1 | 12.7 | 1.25 | 9.9 | 0.93 | 7.3 | 1.56 | 12.3 | 0.5 | 3.9 | 1.64 | 12.9 |
| C2 | 44.8 | 1.95 | 4.3 | 2.94 | 6.6 | 3.53 | 7.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.53 | 7.9 |
K210623 - Page 6 of 15
{6}
FLC Lambda
| Sample | Mean (mg/L) | Within-Day | | Between-Days | | Within-Operator | | Between-Operators | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 1 | 13.4 | 0.87 | 6.5 | 0.83 | 6.2 | 1.20 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.20 | 9.0 |
| 2 | 21.1 | 0.98 | 4.6 | 1.49 | 7.1 | 1.79 | 8.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.79 | 8.5 |
| 3 | 35.4 | 2.7 | 7.6 | 2.87 | 8.1 | 3.94 | 11.10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.94 | 11.1 |
| 4 | 81.5 | 5.88 | 7.2 | 5.58 | 6.8 | 8.11 | 10.0 | 3.99 | 4.9 | 9.03 | 11.1 |
| C1 | 20.7 | 1.59 | 7.7 | 1.41 | 6.8 | 2.13 | 10.3 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 2.13 | 10.3 |
| C2 | 37.1 | 2.09 | 5.6 | 2.81 | 7.6 | 3.51 | 9.4 | 1.93 | 5.2 | 4.0 | 10.8 |
Lot-to-Lot Variability
Six samples including four serum samples (samples 1 to 4) and two controls (samples C1 and C2) were tested using the FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda kit. Each day, during five days, one operator analyzed the same samples (five replicates / sample) on a microplate using three reagent lots (one microplate/lot, same design each day), yielding a total of 75 results per sample. The results including lot-to-lot imprecision is summarized in the following table.
FLC Kappa
| Sample | Mean (mg/L) | Within-Day | | Between-Days | | Within-Lot | | Between-Lots | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 1 | 6.8 | 0.36 | 5.3 | 0.50 | 7.4 | 0.62 | 9.1 | 0.17 | 2.6 | 0.64 | 9.4 |
| 2 | 15.3 | 0.50 | 3.3 | 0.55 | 3.6 | 0.74 | 4.9 | 0.40 | 2.6 | 0.84 | 5.5 |
| 3 | 38.7 | 2.00 | 5.2 | 1.72 | 4.4 | 2.64 | 6.8 | 0.76 | 2.0 | 2.75 | 7.1 |
| 4 | 62.2 | 3.59 | 5.8 | 1.69 | 2.7 | 3.96 | 6.4 | 1.65 | 2.6 | 4.29 | 6.9 |
| C1 | 12.1 | 0.86 | 7.1 | 0.54 | 4.4 | 1.01 | 8.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.01 | 8.3 |
| C2 | 38.7 | 2.00 | 5.2 | 1.72 | 4.4 | 2.64 | 6.8 | 0.76 | 2.0 | 2.75 | 7.1 |
FLC Lambda
| Sample | Mean (mg/L) | Within-Day | | Between-Days | | Within-Lot | | Between-Lots | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 1 | 13.8 | 1.14 | 8.3 | 1.20 | 8.7 | 1.66 | 12.0 | 1.40 | 10.1 | 2.17 | 15.7 |
| 2 | 20.8 | 0.99 | 4.8 | 1.98 | 9.5 | 2.21 | 10.7 | 2.20 | 10.6 | 3.12 | 15.0 |
| 3 | 33.7 | 2.91 | 8.6 | 3.12 | 9.3 | 4.27 | 12.7 | 0.70 | 2.1 | 4.33 | 12.9 |
| 4 | 71.4 | 5.71 | 8.0 | 7.63 | 10.7 | 9.53 | 13.4 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 9.53 | 13.4 |
| C1 | 20.9 | 1.70 | 8.2 | 1.51 | 7.2 | 2.27 | 10.9 | 2.32 | 11.1 | 3.25 | 15.6 |
| C2 | 38.5 | 1.84 | 4.8 | 3.29 | 8.5 | 3.77 | 9.8 | 1.66 | 4.3 | 4.12 | 10.7 |
K210623 - Page 7 of 15
{7}
Site-to-Site Reproducibility:
Six samples including four serum samples (samples S1 to S4) and two controls (samples C1 and C2) were tested using the FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda kit. Each day, for five days, an operator analyzed the same samples (five replicates per sample) on a microplate using one reagent lot (same microplate design each day), yielding a total of 25 results per sample. The same protocol was followed by two other operators in two other laboratories with the same reagent lot. The SD and %CV were evaluated for within-day, between-day, within-site, between-sites, and total reproducibility. The results are summarized in the table below:
FLC Kappa
| Sample ID | Mean (mg/L) | Within-Day | | Between-Days | | Within-Site | | Between-Sites | | Reproducibility | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 1 | 6.2 | 0.45 | 7.2 | 0.39 | 6.3 | 0.60 | 9.6 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.60 | 9.6 |
| 2 | 15.0 | 0.87 | 5.8 | 1.48 | 9.9 | 1.71 | 11.4 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 1.71 | 11.4 |
| 3 | 32.5 | 1.29 | 4.0 | 2.76 | 8.5 | 3.05 | 9.4 | 1.48 | 4.5 | 3.38 | 10.4 |
| 4 | 71.9 | 4.23 | 5.9 | 5.78 | 8.0 | 7.16 | 9.9 | 2.86 | 4.0 | 7.71 | 10.7 |
| C1 | 13.8 | 1.08 | 7.9 | 0.70 | 5.0 | 1.29 | 9.3 | 1.69 | 12.2 | 2.12 | 15.4 |
| C2 | 57.2 | 2.67 | 4.7 | 2.68 | 4.7 | 3.78 | 6.6 | 3.79 | 6.6 | 5.36 | 9.4 |
FLC Lambda
| Sample ID | Mean (mg/L) | Within-Day | | Between-Days | | Within-Site | | Between-Sites | | Reproducibility | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| 1 | 11.4 | 0.76 | 6.7 | 0.91 | 8.0 | 1.19 | 10.5 | 0.51 | 4.5 | 1.30 | 11.4 |
| 2 | 20.7 | 1.51 | 7.3 | 1.62 | 7.8 | 2.22 | 10.7 | 1.12 | 5.4 | 2.48 | 12.0 |
| 3 | 31.3 | 2.12 | 6.8 | 3.39 | 10.8 | 4.00 | 12.8 | 1.87 | 6.0 | 4.42 | 14.1 |
| 4 | 68.8 | 4.44 | 6.5 | 6.13 | 8.9 | 7.57 | 11.0 | 4.81 | 7.0 | 8.97 | 13.0 |
| C1 | 24.2 | 1.62 | 6.7 | 2.27 | 9.4 | 2.78 | 11.5 | 2.40 | 9.9 | 3.68 | 15.2 |
| C2 | 50.1 | 3.87 | 7.7 | 5.81 | 11.6 | 6.98 | 13.9 | 2.83 | 5.7 | 7.53 | 15.1 |
2. Linearity:
The linearity of the FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda assays was evaluated based on three panels using native patient samples. Each panel was prepared by proportional mixing of one low sample with concentration close to the concentration of the Calibrator 1 and one high sample with concentration close to the concentration of the Calibrator 5 in order to reach 12 concentration levels. Each concentration level sample was tested in seven replicates using one reagent lot of each FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda. The summary data for linearity study of FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda are summarized in the table below.
K210623 - Page 8 of 15
{8}
K210623 - Page 9 of 15
| | Range Tested (mg/L) | Slope (95% CI) | Y-intercept (95% CI) | Recovery % (min-max) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FLC Kappa | | | | |
| Panel 1 | (4.4; 81.7) | 1.01 (0.95; 1.07) | -0.30 (-0.88; 0.29) | 94.2–100.6 |
| Panel 2 | (4.5; 79.9) | 1.02 (0.97; 1.07) | -0.20 (-0.72; 0.32) | 97.1–101.3 |
| Panel 3 | (3.5; 76.2) | 0.93 (0.86; 1.00) | 0.50 (-0.11; 1.10) | 94.0–107.5 |
| FLC Lambda | | | | |
| Panel 1 | (3.8; 74.1) | 1.05 (0.94; 1.15) | -1.54 (-2.52; -0.55) | 64.1*–102.5 |
| Panel 2 | (3.3; 77.7) | 0.96 (0.93; 0.98) | -0.62 (-0.84; -0.40) | 76.9*–94.8 |
| Panel 3 | (3.5; 66.8) | 0.96 (0.89; 1.03) | -0.31 (-0.87; 0.25) | 87.3–95.6 |
* Low-level sample in Panel 1 (3.8 mg/L) and Panel 2 (3.3 mg/L).
The results support the linearity of the following claimed AMR:
FLC Kappa: 4.5 – 76.2 mg/L
FLC Lambda: 3.8 – 66.8 mg/L
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
Endogenous Interference Study
Three serum samples containing normal, medium and high analyte concentrations were tested for the presence of endogenous interferants using FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda kits based on the CLSI EP7-A2 and the CLSI EP07, 3rd Edition. The test samples were prepared by supplementing interferants in the solvent (either saline or NaOH) to reach the desired concentration of the interferant to be tested. Additionally, neat serum samples were supplemented with the same volume of solvent, and these were considered blanks samples. The test samples and blank samples were analyzed by one operator through one run and 10 replicates each for test and blank samples. Mean relative deviation was calculated for blank and test sample and no significant interference (deviation < ±10%) was observed for each tested interferant up to the following concentration levels:
FLC Kappa
| Interferants | Concentration Level |
| --- | --- |
| Conjugated Bilirubin | 66.6 mg/dL |
| Unconjugated Bilirubin | 40 mg/dL |
| Total Protein* | 150 g/L |
| Hemoglobin | 10 g/L |
| Triglycerides | 20 g/L |
| Rheumatoid Factor* | 2000 IU/mL |
* Maximum deviation for total protein and Rheumatoid factor is 11.7% and 12.2%, respectively.
{9}
FLC Lambda
| Interferants | Concentration Level |
| --- | --- |
| Conjugated Bilirubin | 66.6 mg/dL |
| Unconjugated Bilirubin* | 40 mg/dL |
| Total Protein* | 150 g/L |
| Hemoglobin* | 10 g/L |
| Triglycerides* | 20 g/L |
| Rheumatoid Factor | 250 IU/mL |
* Maximum deviation for unconjugated bilirubin, total protein, hemoglobin and triglycerides and rheumatoid factor is 11.7%, 11.6%, 11.7% and 12.2%, respectively.
## Exogenous Interference Study
Three serum samples containing normal, medium and high analyte concentrations were tested for the presence of exogenous interferants using FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda kits based on the CLSI EP7-A2 and the CLSI EP07, 3rd Edition. The test samples were prepared by supplementing interferants in the solvent (either saline or NaOH) to reach the desired concentration of the interferant to be tested. Additionally, neat serum samples were supplemented with the same volume of solvent, and these were considered blanks samples. The test samples and blank samples were analyzed by one operator through one run and 10 replicates each for test and blank samples. Mean relative deviation was calculated for blank and test sample and no significant interference (deviation < ±10%) was observed for each tested interferant up to the following concentration levels:
| Interferants | Concentration Level |
| --- | --- |
| Melphalan | 4 mg/L |
| Dexamethasone* | 12 mg/L |
| Daratumumab* | 1 g/L |
| Bortezomib | 2 mg/L |
| Lenalidomide | 4 mg/L |
| Pomalidomide | 1 mg/L |
| Carfilzomib* | 1 mg/L |
| Isatuximab* | 1 g/L |
* Maximum deviation for FLC Kappa assay for Carfilzomib is 11.2%. Maximum deviation for FLC Lambda assay for Dexamethasone, Daratumumab and Isatuximab is 11.3%, 10.8% and 10.9% respectively.
## 4. Assay Reportable Range:
The assay reportable range for the FLC Kappa and the FLC Lambda is the same as the analytical measuring range for these two assays:
FLC Kappa: 4.5 – 76.2 mg/L
FLC Lambda: 3.8 – 66.8 mg/L
## 5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
K210623 - Page 10 of 15
{10}
K210623 - Page 11 of 15
## Traceability
In the absence of an international reference standard, the calibration of the FLC Kappa and the FLC Lambda assays is traceable to an internally assigned master material.
## Stability
### Reagent Kit
a. Shelf-life stability: The real-time shelf-life stability of the FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda reagent kits was determined over a 10-month period using three reagent lots of each assay. Each reagent lot stored at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ was tested at 0 $(\mathrm{T_0})$, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 10 months. At each testing point, three serum samples (low, medium and high concentration) as well as two controls (FLC Control Level 1 and FLC Control Level 2) were tested in triplicate using all three reagent lots of FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda, respectively. At each time point, the mean concentrations for Kappa and Lambda were compared to the initial target range concentration obtained at $\mathrm{T_0}$. The results are acceptable at all tested time points and hence support the shelf-life of FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda for 9 months at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$.
b. Open-vial stability: The open-vial (in-use) kit stability of the FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda reagent kits was determined over a 5-week period using two reagent lots. Each reagent lot after first opening was stored at room temperature $(22^{\circ}\mathrm{C} \pm 3^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ and was tested each week for five weeks (weeks 1–5). At each testing point, three serum samples (low, medium, and high concentration) were tested in triplicate on two reagent lots of FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda, respectively. The results are acceptable at all tested time points and hence support the claimed in-use stability of the FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda up to 4 weeks at room temperature $(22^{\circ}\mathrm{C} \pm 3^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ after the first opening.
### FLC Controls
a. Shelf-life stability: The real-time stability of the FLC Control Level 1 and FLC Control Level 2 was determined over a 24-month period using three reagent lots. Each freeze-dried control stored at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ was tested at 0 $(\mathrm{T_0})$, 4, 8, 12, and 24 months. At each testing point, FLC Control Level 1 and FLC Control Level 2 were tested in triplicate using three reagent lots of FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda, respectively. At each time point, the mean concentrations for Kappa and Lambda were compared to the initial target range concentration obtained at the zero-month $(\mathrm{T_0})$ time point. The results were acceptable at all tested time points and hence support the claimed shelf-life stability of the FLC Control Level 1 and FLC Control Level 2 up to 12 months at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$.
b. In-use (reconstituted) stability: The stability of reconstituted FLC Control Level 1 and FLC Control Level 2 were tested for the following storage conditions: $-18^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ to $-30^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$, $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$, and room temperature $(22^{\circ}\mathrm{C} \pm 3^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$. The stability of freeze-thaw cycles for the Controls (freezing at $-18^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ to $-30^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$, thawing at room temperature) was also tested. For each test condition, three lots of the Controls were tested. At each time point post first reconstitution, the mean concentrations for the FLC Controls were compared to the initial target range concentration obtained when the open vials of the Controls were reconstituted for the first time. The results support the stability claim for the Controls: 3
{11}
months at $-18^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ to $-30^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ ; 4 days at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ ; 24 hours (one day) at room temperature $(22^{\circ}\mathrm{C} \pm 3^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ , and up to 40 freeze-thaw cycles.
# 6. Detection Limit:
The limit of blank (LoB) for the FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda was determined by testing the blank samples. All measurements yielded no detectable value. Hence the claimed LoB for the FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda is $0\mathrm{mg / L}$ .
The limit of detection (LoD) for the FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda assays was determined by assaying five samples with low Kappa free light chain concentration and five samples with low Lambda free light chain concentration. The samples were tested in two runs of four replicates over the course of 7 days using two reagent lots yielding a total of 56 replicates per sample for each lot. The precision profile analysis was used to calculate the LoD. Since LoD values were lower than the calibrator 1 value, the LoD was considered as equal to the LoQ value.
The limit of quantitation (LoQ) for the FLC Kappa and FLC lambda assays was determined by assaying five samples with low Kappa free light chain concentration and five samples with low Lambda free light chain concentration. The samples were tested in two runs of four replicates over the course of 7 days using two reagent lots yielding a total of 56 replicates per sample for each lot. The LoQ was defined to be the lowest concentration level that meets the within-laboratory imprecision of $< 20\%$ for each lot. The calculated LoQ for Kappa was determined to be $0.8 \, \mathrm{mg/L}$ and $1.1 \, \mathrm{mg/L}$ for Lambda. The data for linearity supported the lower level of measuring interval for Kappa and Lambda to be $4.5 \, \mathrm{mg/L}$ and $3.8 \, \mathrm{mg/L}$ , respectively. Hence the claimed LoQ for the FLC Kappa is $4.5 \, \mathrm{mg/L}$ and the claimed LoQ for the FLC Lambda is $3.8 \, \mathrm{mg/L}$ .
# 7. Assay Cut-Off:
See expected values/reference range.
# B Comparison Studies:
# 1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
A total of 222 samples were tested with the FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda kits and the predicate devices: Freelite Human Kappa Free and Freelite Human Lambda Free kits for use on the Siemens BN II. The samples included 96 Multiple Myeloma (MM) and 83 Amyloid Light chain (AL) serum samples. The regression analysis was performed based on the results of 216 samples for the FLC Kappa assay and its predicate, and the results of 221 samples for the FLC Lambda assay and its predicate.
| | N | Sample Range mg/L | Slope (95% CI) | Y-Intercept (95% CI) | R2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FLC Kappa | 216 | 1.0 – 1947.0 | 0.56 (0.51–0.60) | 0.91 (0.75–1.07) | 0.92 |
| FLC Lambda | 221 | 1.6 – 860.4 | 0.61 (0.52–0.69) | 2.243 (1.15–3.34) | 0.75 |
K210623 - Page 12 of 15
{12}
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable
C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity and Clinical Specificity:
A total of 510 samples were tested in the clinical validation study for the FLC Kappa and Lambda assay. This validation set included 177 samples from MM patients, 144 samples from AL amyloidosis patients and 189 samples from non-myeloma patients with various clinical conditions: 35 samples from polyclonal immunoglobulin stimulation patients; 19 samples from chronic kidney disorders (CKD) patients and 126 samples from patients with other clinical conditions.
For MM, a total of 366 samples were included in the clinical validation study for the FLC Kappa and Lambda assays. This validation set included 177 samples from multiple myeloma patients, and 189 samples from non-myeloma patients with various clinical conditions.
Clinical sensitivity and specificity summary of the FLC Kappa and Lambda Ratio for MM are shown in the table below using the FLC Kappa and Lambda ratio reference interval as cut-off (i.e., ratio within the reference interval is considered as positive; Ratio outside the reference interval is considered as negative):
| | Clinical Diagnosis of MM | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| FLC Kappa and Lambda Ratio | Positive | 171 | 28 | 199 |
| | Negative | 6 | 161 | 167 |
| | Total | 177 | 189 | 366 |
Clinical Sensitivity: 96.6% (95% CI: 94.0 - 99.3)
Clinical Specificity: 85.1% (95% CI: 79.4 - 89.5)
For AL amyloidosis, a total of 333 samples were included in the clinical validation study for the FLC Kappa and Lambda assay. This validation set included 144 samples from AL amyloidosis patients, and 189 non-AL amyloidosis samples from patients with various clinical conditions.
Clinical sensitivity and specificity summary of the FLC Kappa and Lambda Ratio for AL are shown in the table below using the FLC Kappa and Lambda ratio reference interval as cut-off (i.e., ratio within the reference interval is considered as positive; ratio outside the reference interval is considered as negative):
K210623 - Page 13 of 15
{13}
| | Clinical Diagnosis of AL | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| FLC Kappa and Lambda Ratio | Positive | 131 | 28 | 159 |
| | Negative | 13 | 161 | 174 |
| | Total | 144 | 189 | 333 |
Clinical Sensitivity: $91.0\%$ (95% CI: 86.3 - 95.7)
Clinical Specificity: $85.1\%$ (95% CI: 79.4 - 89.5)
# 2. Other Supportive Data:
In the clinical study described above, all samples were also tested with the predicate device. The clinical performance of the FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda as an aid in diagnosis of MM and as an aid in diagnosis of AL was compared to the predicate device. The results are summarized in the following table.
| Sebia FLC Kappa/FLC Lambda | | Freelite Human Kappa Free/ Freelite Human Lambda Free kits for use on the Siemens BN II | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Diagnosis of MM | | | |
| Sensitivity (n/N) (95% CI) | Specificity (n/N) (95% CI) | Sensitivity (n/N) (95% CI) | Specificity (n/N) (95% CI) |
| 96.6% (171/177) (94.0%; 99.3%) | 85.1% (151/189) (79.4%; 89.5%) | 96.6% (173/179) (94.0%; 99.3%) | 68.3% (129/189) (61.3%; 74.4%) |
| Diagnosis of AL | | | |
| Sensitivity (n/N) (95% CI) | Specificity (n/N) (95% CI) | Sensitivity (n/N) (95% CI) | Specificity (n/N) (95% CI) |
| 91.0% (131/144) (86.3%; 95.7%) | 85.1% (151/189) (79.4%; 89.5%) | 89.6% (129/144) (84.6%; 94.6%) | 68.3% (129/189) (61.3%; 74.4%) |
# D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable
# E Expected Values/Reference Range:
The reference interval for the FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda was determined by testing the values for Kappa FLC concentration, Lambda FLC concentration, and [Kappa FLC] / [Lambda FLC] ratio on 238 apparently healthy adults using one reagent lot of the FLC Kappa and FLC Lambda, respectively. The reference interval for FLC Kappa & FLC Lambda assays were defined as $95\%$ of the dataset. The results are summarized as follows:
| | Mean | 95% Reference Range |
| --- | --- | --- |
| FLC Kappa | 10.9 mg/L | 6.4 – 17.4 mg/L |
| FLC Lambda | 13.4 mg/L | 8.4 – 21.8 mg/L |
| Kappa/Lambda Ratio | 0.83 | 0.46 – 1.51 |
K210623 - Page 14 of 15
{14}
VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K210623 - Page 15 of 15
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.