Retrospective clinical and challenge isolate data from previous 510(k) submission (K121863)
The sponsor re-analyzed 1,623 clinical and challenge Streptococcus spp. isolates from a previously cleared study to demonstrate substantial equivalence under updated FDA-recognized susceptibility test interpretive criteria (breakpoints).
Re-analysis of K121863 clinical and challenge data; Retrospective re-analysis of previously collected clinical and challenge isolate data; Follow-up/Duration: Not applicable; Study Period: Data originally collected for K121863
Streptococcus spp. (S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, Viridans Group, and other β-hemolytic streptococci); Sample Size: 1623 isolates (1416 clinical, 207 challenge)
CLSI broth microdilution reference method
Essential Agreement (EA) and Category Agreement (CA) based on updated FDA breakpoints
AI Performance
Output
Algorithm
Acceptance
Observed
Dev DS
Dev Readers
Test DS
Test Readers
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus spp.
Discriminate Analysis Algorithm
—
97.3% EA and 97.1% CA for Viridans Group; 100% EA and 100% CA for S. pyogenes and other beta-hemolytic streptococci
—
—
Re-analysis of 1623 clinical and challenge isolates from K121863
—
Indications for Use
VITEK® 2 AST-Streptococcus Cefotaxime is designed for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus spp. and is intended for use with the VITEK® 2 and VITEK® 2 Compact Systems as a laboratory aid in the determination of in vitro susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. VITEK® 2 AST- Streptococcus Cefotaxime is a quantitative test.
Device Story
VITEK 2 AST-Streptococcus Cefotaxime is an in vitro diagnostic test for determining antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus species. Input: clinical isolate diluted in saline. Principle: miniaturized, automated microdilution MIC technique. Device consists of 64-well cards containing premeasured antibiotic and culture media. VITEK 2 systems automatically fill, seal, and incubate cards; VITEK 2 Compact requires manual loading. System monitors growth in wells over time. Output: quantitative MIC value and interpretive category. Used in clinical laboratories by technicians/microbiologists. Results assist clinicians in selecting appropriate antibiotic therapy for patients with streptococcal infections.
Clinical Evidence
External evaluation conducted using contemporary clinical isolates, stock isolates, and challenge strains. Performance compared to CLSI broth microdilution reference method. Results: Essential Agreement (EA) ranged from 97.3% to 100.0% across Streptococcus species. Category Agreement (CA) ranged from 89.5% to 100.0%. No Very Major Errors (VME) observed. Minor errors (mE) and Major Errors (ME) were within acceptable limits.
Indicated for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A β-hemolytic), Streptococcus spp. (Viridans group), and Streptococcus spp. β-Hemolytic Group (other than S. pyogenes).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A fully automated short-term incubation cycle antimicrobial susceptibility system is a device that incorporates concentrations of antimicrobial agents into a system for the purpose of determining in vitro susceptibility of bacterial pathogens isolated from clinical specimens. Test results obtained from short-term (less than 16 hours) incubation are used to determine the antimicrobial agent of choice to treat bacterial diseases.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is FDA's guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) Systems; Guidance for Industry and FDA.”
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K210287
B Applicant
bioMérieux, Inc
C Proprietary and Established Names
VITEK 2 AST- Streptococcus Cefotaxime (≤0.125 - ≥8 μg/mL).
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LON | Class II | 21 CFR 866.1645 - Fully Automated Short-Term Incubation Cycle Antimicrobial Susceptibility System | MI - Microbiology |
| LTW | Class II | 21 CFR 866.1640 - Antimicrobial susceptibility test powder | MI - Microbiology |
| LTT | Class II | 21 CFR 866.1640 - Antimicrobial susceptibility test powder | MI - Microbiology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
### A Purpose for Submission:
To update the VITEK 2 AST-Streptococcus Cefotaxime device labeling to include updated FDA-recognized breakpoints for Streptococcus spp Viridans Group, Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A β-Hemolytic streptococci) and Streptococcus spp β-Hemolytic Group (other than S. pyogenes) as published in the FDA STIC website.
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
Breakpoints for Streptococcus pneumoniae (meningitis) and (non-meningitis) (also indicated for use with this device) remain unchanged.
Previously obtained QC and reproducibility data is applicable to this reevaluation.
## B Measurand:
Cefotaxime (≤0.125 - ≥8 µg/ml).
## C Type of Test:
Automated quantitative or qualitative antimicrobial susceptibility test.
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
### A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
### B Indication(s) for Use:
VITEK 2 AST-Streptococcus Cefotaxime is designed for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus spp. and is intended for use with the VITEK 2 and VITEK 2 Compact Systems as a laboratory aid in the determination of in vitro susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. VITEK 2 AST-Streptococcus cefotaxime is a quantitative test.
Cefotaxime has been shown to be active against most strains of the microorganisms listed below, according to the FDA label for this antimicrobial.
**Active in vitro and in clinical infections:**
**Streptococcus pneumoniae**
**Streptococcus pyogenes** (Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci)*
**Streptococcus spp.** (Viridans group streptococci)
*The VITEK 2 Streptococcus susceptibility card also reports the susceptibility of the following additional organisms as listed on the FDA Susceptibility Test Interpretative Criteria web site (STIC): Streptococcus spp. β-Hemolytic Group (other than S. pyogenes).
The VITEK 2 Streptococcus Susceptibility Card is intended for use with the VITEK 2 Systems in clinical laboratories as an in vitro test to determine the susceptibility of S. pneumoniae, beta-hemolytic Streptococcus, and Viridans Streptococcus to antimicrobial agents when used as instructed.
K210287 - Page 2 of 14
{2}
K210287 - Page 3 of 14
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
Limitation:
"The ability of the AST card to detect resistance with the following combination(s) is unknown because resistant strains were either not available or an insufficient number were encountered at the time of comparative testing:
- Cefotaxime (ctx01n): Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A β-hemolytic streptococci) and Streptococcus spp β-hemolytic Group (other than S. pyogenes)".
D Special Instrument Requirements:
VITEK 2 and VITEK 2 COMPACT Systems.
IV Device/System Characteristics:
A Device Description:
The VITEK 2 AST card is a miniaturized, abbreviated and automated version of the doubling dilution technique for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Each VITEK 2 test card contains 64 microwells. A control well containing only culture medium is included on all cards, with the remaining wells containing premeasured amounts of a specific antimicrobial agent in a culture medium base. A suspension of organism from a pure culture is prepared in a tube containing 0.45-0.5% sterile saline and standardized to a McFarland 0.5 using the DensiCHEK Plus. The VITEK 2 System automatically fills, seals and places the card into the incubator/reader; manual methods can also be used for the inoculation of test cards for use in the VITEK 2 System. The VITEK 2 Compact has a manual filling and sealing operation. The VITEK 2 Systems monitor the growth of each well in the card over a defined period of time. At the completion of the incubation cycle, a report is generated that contains the MIC value along with the interpretive category result for each antimicrobial contained on the card.
VITEK 2 AST-Streptococcus Cefotaxime has the following concentrations in the card: 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 µg/mL (equivalent standard method concentration by efficacy in µg/mL). The MIC result reporting range for the card is ≤0.125 - ≥ 8 µg/mL. For all species, the MIC results range indicates that the VITEK 2 system is capable of producing the following MIC results ≤0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and ≥ 8 µg/mL for AST-ST Cefotaxime test. This means the VITEK 2 systems does not provide results lower than 0.125 µg/mL, or greater than 8 µg/mL for the AST-ST Cefotaxime test.
B Principle of Operation:
The VITEK 2 and VITEK 2 Compact Systems utilize automated growth-based detection using attenuation of light measured by an optical scanner. The optics used in the systems use visible light to directly measure organism growth within each of the 64 micro-wells. Transmittance optics are based on an initial light reading of a well before significant growth
{3}
has begun. Periodic light transmittance samplings of the same well measure organism growth by how much light is prevented from going through the well. The VITEK 2 System monitors the growth of each well in the card over a defined period of time. At the completion of the incubation cycle, a report is automatically generated that contains the MIC value along with the interpretive category result for each antibiotic on the card.
K210287 - Page 4 of 14
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
Vitek 2 AST-ST Cefotaxime.
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K121863
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | Device: K210287 | Predicate: K121863 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Vitek 2 AST-Streptococcus Cefotaxime (≤0.125 -≥8 μg/mL) | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications for Use | VITEK 2 AST-Streptococcus Cefotaxime is designed for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus spp. and is intended for use with the VITEK 2 and VITEK 2 Compact Systems as a laboratory aid in the determination of in vitro susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. VITEK2 AST-Streptococcus Cefotaxime is a quantitative test. | Same |
| Test Method | Automated antimicrobial susceptibility test for use with the VITEK 2 and VITEK 2 COMPACT Systems to determine the in vitro susceptibility of microorganisms. | Same |
| Inoculum | Saline suspension of organism | Same |
| Test Card | Streptococcus (AST-ST) Susceptibility Card. | Same |
| Instrument | VITEK 2 and VITEK 2 COMPACT Systems | Same |
{4}
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
K210287 - Page 5 of 14
| Analysis Algorithm | Discriminate Analysis Algorithm | Same |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Antimicrobial Concentrations & Result Range | Cefotaxime: for a calling range of ≤0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 ≥8 μg/mL. | Same |
| **General Device Characteristic Differences** | | |
| FDA/CLSI Breakpoints | *Streptococcus spp Beta*
Hemolytic Group
≤0.5(S), -, -
*Streptococcus spp.* (Viridans Group):
≤1(S), 2(I), ≥4(R) | *Streptococcus spp:*
*S. pyogenes* (Group A β-Hemolytic streptococci):
≤0.5(S), 1(I), ≥2(R) |
| Indicated Organisms | Cefotaxime has been shown to be active against most strains of the microorganisms listed below, according to the FDA label for this antimicrobial.
*Active in vitro and in clinical infections:*
*Streptococcus pneumoniae*
*Streptococcus pyogenes* (Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci)
*Streptococcus spp* (Viridans group streptococci
The VITEK 2 *Streptococcus* susceptibility card also reports the susceptibility of the following additional organisms as listed on the FDA Susceptibility Test Interpretative Criteria web site (STIC): *Streptococcus* spp β-Hemolytic Group (other than S. pyogenes).
The VITEK 2 *Streptococcus* Susceptibility Card is intended for use with the VITEK 2 Systems in clinical laboratories as an in vitro test to determine the susceptibility of *S. pneumoniae*, *beta*-hemolytic *Streptococcus*, and *Viridans*
*Streptococcus* to antimicrobial agents when used as instructed. | Cefotaxime has been shown to be active against most strains of the microorganisms listed below, according to the FDA label for this antimicrobial.
*Active in vitro and in clinical infections:*
*Streptococcus pneumoniae*
*Streptococcus pyogenes* (Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci)
*Streptococcus spp.*
The VITEK 2 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) is intended to be used with the VITEK 2 and VITEK 2 Compact Systems for the automated quantitative or qualitative susceptibility testing of isolated colonies for most clinically significant aerobic gram-negative bacilli, *Staphylococcus* spp, *Enterococcus* spp, *Streptococcus agalactiae*, and *S. pneumoniae*. |
{5}
Data that was reanalyzed to support this submission was previously obtained from a previously completed clinical studies. The clinical study was reviewed and cleared in K121863. The CLSI Standards listed below were effective during the original clearance:
- CLSI M7-A8, “Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically Approved Standard –Eighth Edition” Vol. 29, No. 2 (January 2009).
- M100 S18., “Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. CLSI supplement
- CLSI M100-S21, “Performance Standard for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Twenty-First Informational Supplement” Vol. 31, No. 1 (January 2011).
- Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) Systems, 2009.
## VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### A Analytical Performance:
1. **Precision/Reproducibility:**
Refer to K121863. Reproducibility testing for the VITEK 2 AST *Streptococcus* Cefotaxime was performed in support of clearance of K121863 and was determined acceptable.
2. **Linearity:**
Not applicable.
3. **Analytical Specificity/Interference:**
Not applicable.
4. **Assay Reportable Range:**
Not applicable.
5. **Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):**
Quality Control (QC) testing, Inoculum and Growth failure for the VITEK 2 AST *Streptococcus* Cefotaxime was performed in support of clearance of K121863 and was determined acceptable. QC testing specific to the changes in breakpoints was not performed in the current submission.
The QC organism recommended by both the FDA and CLSI, namely *Streptococcus pneumoniae* ATCC 49619, was tested against Cefotaxime during the clinical study a
K210287 - Page 6 of 14
{6}
minimum 20 times/site by the VITEK 2 automatic and the manual dilution and the VITEK 2 Compact system using the manual dilution. The QC organism was tested by the VITEK 2 AST card and the reference broth microdilution method.
At the time of the original submission (K121863), the QC range for S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 was 0.06-0.25μg/mL. The recommended CLSI QC range for this strain changed to include lower concentrations with a range of 0.03-0.12 μg/mL. However, the VITEK 2 MIC reporting range is ≤0.125 – ≥8 μg/mL. The VITEK 2 systems does not provide results lower than 0.125 μg/mL. Therefore, all QC results for S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 are off scale for the VITEK 2 and VITEK 2 Compact Systems as both VITEK systems report the lowest end of the scale as ≤ 0.12 μg/mL. An MIC value of ≤0.12 μg/mL indicated that the quality control test results were acceptable (Table 1).
Table 1. Quality Control Results for VITEK 2 (Auto-Dilution and Manual Dilution Methods) and VITEK 2 Compact (Manual Dilution Method)
| Organism | VITEK 2 Result Range^{1} | BMD Result Range (μg/mL) | VITEK 2 Auto-Dilution | BMD^{2} | VITEK 2 Manual Dilution | BMD | VITEK 2 Compact Manual Dilution | BMD |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619
Expected Result: 0.03-0.12 μg/mL | | ≤0.016 | | 1 | | 1 | | |
| | | 0.03 | | | | | | |
| | | 0.06 | | 128 | | 126 | | 48 |
| | ≤0.12 | 0.12 | 182 | 53 | 178 | 52 | 74 | 26 |
| | 0.5 | 0.5 | | | 1 | | | |
| | 1 | 1 | | | | | | |
| | 2 | 2 | | | | | | |
| | 4 | 4 | | | | | | |
| | ≥8 | 8 | | | | | | |
| | | 16 | | | | | | |
| | | ≥32 | | | | | | |
1VITEK 2 Card range is ≤0.125 - ≥8 and does not include the full CLSI/FDA recommended dilution range for QC testing with S. pneumoniae. The lowest dilution of the VITEK 2 Cefotaxime MIC range is ≤0.12 μg/mL. Obtaining this value was considered an indication that the quality control test results were acceptable.
2BMD: CLSI reference broth microdilution.
bioMérieux included the following as a footnote to the Quality Control table in the device labeling:
“Does not include the full CLSI/FDA recommended dilution range for QC testing with this organism”.
The QC performance data is acceptable for the purpose of the re-evaluation of the performance of Streptococcus spp. when the new breakpoints are applied.
6. Detection Limit:
Not applicable.
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
K210287 - Page 7 of 14
{7}
# B Comparison Studies:
# 1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
The VITEK 2 AST-ST Cefotaxime $\leq 0.125 - \geq 8$ , which was originally cleared in K121863, included indications for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci) and Streptococcus spp tested with the VITEK 2 auto dilution and the VITEK 2 manual dilution and compared to the CLSI broth microdilution.
The performance of the VITEK 2 AST-ST Cefotaxime card with Streptococcus spp. (Viridans Group), Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci) and Streptococcus spp ( $\beta$ -hemolytic Group other than S. pyogenes) using revised interpretive criteria currently recognized by FDA was evaluated in the current submission using data obtained in support of K121863.
Since there was no change in the design or the dilution range of the VITEK 2 AST-ST card, the performance evaluation was achieved via re-analysis of the MIC data of the original $510(\mathrm{k})$ submission (K121863).
Even though the breakpoints for Streptococcus pneumoniae (meningitis) and (nonmeningitis) did not change compared to the original submission, the performance of this organism as compared to the reference method was re-analyzed in the current submission.
A total of 1623 (clinical and challenge) Streptococcus spp. isolates were tested using the VITEK 2 with automatic dilution. The isolates included 1416 clinical isolates and 207 challenge isolates.
Results of the re-analyzed 1623 Streptococcus spp. clinical and challenge isolates (including 351 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 408 Streptococcus spp. Viridans Group, 310 Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A $\beta$ -hemolytic streptococci) and 554 Streptococcus spp. $\beta$ -hemolytic Group (other than S. pyogenes) are summarized in Table 2.
The previously collected data for the 207 challenge isolates tested at a single site with the VITEK 2 and the VITEK 2 Compact Systems using the manual dilution was also re-analyzed using the current breakpoints for Streptococcus spp Viridans Group, S. pyogenes (Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci) and Streptococcus spp. $\beta$ -Hemolytic Group (other than S. pyogenes). The results of the re-analysis are outlined in Table 3.
Table 2. Re-analysis of the Performance of Streptococcus spp for the Auto Dilution and the VITEK 2 AST-ST Cefotaxime.
| | Total | #EA | %EA | Eval Total | No Eval EA | Eval EA % | #CA | %CA | No R/ NS | min | maj | vmj |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| S. pneumoniae (non-meningitis breakpoint) ≤1 (S), 2 (I), ≥4 (R) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Clinical | 301 | 296 | 98.3 | 84 | 79 | 94.0 | 270 | 89.7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 30 |
| Challenge | 50 | 50 | 100.0 | 35 | 35 | 100.0 | 45 | 90.0 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Combined | 351 | 346 | 98.6 | 119 | 114 | 95.8 | 315 | 89.7 | 23 | 35 | 1 | 0 |
| S. pneumoniae (meningitis breakpoints) ≤0.5 (S), 1(I), ≥2 (R) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
K210287 - Page 8 of 14
{8}
| Clinical | 301 | 296 | 98.3 | 84 | 79 | 94.0 | 270 | 89.7 | 29 | 29 | 2 | 0 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Challenge | 50 | 50 | 100.0 | 35 | 35 | 100.0 | 44 | 88.0 | 25 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Combined | 351 | 346 | 98.6 | 119 | 114 | 95.8 | 314 | 89.5 | 54 | 35 | 2 | 0 |
| S. pyogenes (Group A β-hemolytic streptococci) ≤0.5 (S), -, - | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Clinical | 260 | 260 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 260 | 100.0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 |
| Challenge | 50 | 50 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 100.0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 |
| Combined | 310 | 310 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 310 | 100.0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 |
| Streptococcus spp (β-hemolytic Group other than S. pyogenes)a, b ≤0.5(S), -, - | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Clinical | 497 | 497 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 497 | 100.0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 |
| Challenge | 57 | 57 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 100.0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 |
| Combined | 554 | 554 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 554 | 100.0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 |
| Streptococcus spp Viridans Groupc ≤1 (S), 2 (I), ≥4 (R) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Clinical | 358 | 347 | 96.9 | 113 | 102 | 90.3 | 346 | 96.6 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Challenge | 50 | 50 | 100% | 20 | 20 | 100% | 50 | 100% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Combined | 408 | 397 | 97.3 | 132 | 122 | 91.7 | 396 | 97.1 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
a Including the following tested species: S. agalactiae, S. canis, S.dys.dysgalactiae, S.dys.equisimilis and S. equi zooepidemicus.
b The interpretive criteria are applied to Streptococcus spp $\beta$ -Hemolytic Group according to the FDA STIC website.
c Including the following tested species: S. anginosus, S. const. constellatus., S. constellatus. pharyngis, S. gordonii, S. intermedius, S. mitis, S. mitis/oralis, S. oralis, S. parasanguinis, S.sal.salivarius, S. sanguinis, S. alactolyticus, S. gal. gallolyticus, S. gal. pasteurianus.
EA - Essential Agreement (+/- 2 dilutions)
CA - Category Agreement
EVAL - Evaluable isolates
R - Resistant
NS-Non-susceptible
min - minor discrepancies
maj - major discrepancies
vmj - very major discrepancies
Essential Agreement (EA) occurs when there is agreement between the result of the reference method and that of VITEK 2 test card within plus or minus one serial two-fold dilution of the antibiotic. Evaluable results are those that are on scale for both the VITEK 2 test card and the reference method. Category Agreement (CA) occurs when the interpretation of the result of the reference method agrees exactly with the interpretation of the VITEK 2 test card.
When applying the new breakpoints of $\leq 1$ (S), $2(\mathrm{I}), \geq 4(\mathrm{R})$ for Streptococcus spp. Viridans Group, the performance of the combined isolates tested with the VITEK 2 and automatic dilution is acceptable with $97.3\%$ EA and $97.1\%$ CA. There were no very major errors and no major errors. Twelve (12) minor errors out of 408 isolates $(2.9\%)$ tested were observed (Table 2).
When applying the new "susceptible only" breakpoints of $\leq 0.5$ for S. pyogenes (Group A $\beta$ -hemolytic streptococci), the performance of combined isolates tested with the VITEK 2 and automatic dilution is acceptable with $100\%$ EA and $100\%$ CA. There were no very major errors and no major errors observed (Table 2).
When applying the new "susceptible only" breakpoints of $\leq 0.5$ for Streptococcus spp ( $\beta$ -hemolytic Group other than S. pyogenes), the performance of combined isolates tested with
K210287 - Page 9 of 14
{9}
the VITEK 2 and automatic dilution is acceptable with 100% EA and 100% CA. There were no very major errors and no major errors observed (Table 2).
Even though the breakpoints of S. pneumoniae (meningitis and non-meningitis breakpoints) did not change from the original submission (K121863), the performance of this organism was re-analyzed in the current submission to align with FDA current analysis of the evaluable results for Essential Agreement. For both, the non-meningitis and the meningitis breakpoints, no changes were observed in the %EA and the %CA and the performance remained acceptable. Applying the FDA current analysis resulted in a decreased percent evaluable EA for S. pneumoniae (non-meningitis and meningitis breakpoints) from 96.6% (in the original K121863 submission) to 95.8% in the current submission (Table 2).
Table 3. Re-analysis of the Performance of Streptococcus spp for the Manual Dilution with the VITEK 2 and the VITEK 2 Compact Systems AST-ST Cefotaxime.
| VITEK 2 Systems | Total | #EA | %EA | Eval Total | No Eval EA | Eval EA % | #CA | %CA | No R/NS | min | maj | vmj |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| S. pneumoniae (Non-Meningitis breakpoint) ≤1(S), 2(I), ≥4(R) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| VITEK 2 | 50 | 50 | 100.0 | 33 | 33 | 100.0 | 46 | 92.0 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| VITEK 2 Compact | 50 | 50 | 100.0 | 34 | 34 | 100.0 | 44 | 88.0 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| S. pneumoniae (meningitis breakpoints) ≤0.5(S), 1(I), ≥2(R) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| VITEK 2 | 50 | 50 | 100.0 | 35 | 35 | 100.0 | 44 | 88.0 | 25 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| VITEK 2 Compact | 50 | 50 | 100.0 | 34 | 34 | 100.0 | 43 | 86.0 | 25 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| S. pyogenes (Group A β-hemolytic streptococci) ≤0.5(S), -, - | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| VITEK 2 | 50 | 50 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | NA | 50 | 100.0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 |
| VITEK 2 Compact | 50 | 49 | 98.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 49 | 98.0 | 0 | NA | 1 | 0 |
| Streptococcus spp β-Hemolytic Group (other than S. pyogenes) ≤0.5(S), -, - | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| VITEK2 | 57 | 57 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 57 | 100.0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 |
| VITEK 2 Compact | 57 | 57 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 57 | 100.0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 |
| Streptococcus spp Viridans Group ≤1(S), 2(I), ≥4(R) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| VITEK 2 | 50 | 50 | 100.0 | 20 | 20 | 100.0 | 49 | 98.0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| VITEK 2 Compact | 50 | 49 | 98.0 | 16 | 15 | 93.8 | 49 | 98.0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
When applying the new breakpoints of ≤1 (S), 2 (I), ≥4 (R), the performance of Streptococcus spp (Viridans Group) challenge isolates tested with the manual dilution and the VITEK 2 and the VITEK 2 Compact systems is acceptable with % EA and % CA >90%. There were no very major errors, no major errors and only one minor error was observed with both the VITEK 2 and the VITEK 2 Compact out of 50 challenge isolates tested. (Table 3).
When applying the new "susceptible only" breakpoints of ≤0.5, the performance of S. pyogenes (Group A β-hemolytic streptococci) challenge isolates tested with the manual dilution and the VITEK 2 and VITEK 2 Compact systems is acceptable with % EA and % CA >90%. There were no very major errors observed with the VITEK 2 and the VITEK 2 Compact. However, there was one major error out of 50 susceptible isolates (2%) observed with the VITEK 2 Compact. No major errors were observed with the VITEK 2 (Table 3).
When applying the new "susceptible only" breakpoints of ≤0.5, the performance of Streptococcus spp (β-hemolytic Group other than S. pyogenes) challenge isolates tested with the
K210287 - Page 10 of 14
{10}
manual dilution and the VITEK 2 and VITEK 2 Compact systems is acceptable with % EA and % CA >90%. There were no very major errors and no major errors observed. (Table 3).
For S. pneumoniae challenge isolates (non-meningitis and meningitis breakpoints) tested with the manual dilution and the VITEK 2 and VITEK 2 Compact systems, no changes were observed in the %EA, %CA and the % Evaluable EA compared to the original submission (K121863). The performance remained acceptable. (Table 3).
As required under 511A (2) (2) (B) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, the following statement was included under Precautions Section in the device labeling:
Per the FDA-Recognized Susceptibility Test Interpretive Criteria website, the safety and efficacy of antimicrobial drugs, for which antimicrobial susceptibility is tested by this AST device, may or may not have been established in adequate and well-controlled clinical trials for treating clinical infections due to microorganisms outside of those found in the indications and usage in the drug label. The clinical significance of susceptibility information in those instances is unknown. The approved labeling for specific antimicrobial drugs provides the uses for which the antimicrobial drug is approved.
## Resistant Isolates Tested:
A total number of 12 Streptococcus spp. (Viridans Group) isolates out of 408 isolates tested (3%) provided resistant results with the revised breakpoints. The resistance has not drastically changed since the original clearance and the data set is still appropriate for evaluation with the new breakpoints. Based on the time of initial testing, the resistant strains evaluated in the original study likely represent the current resistance population.
Resistant strains of S. pyogenes (Group A β-Hemolytic streptococci) and Streptococcus spp β-Hemolytic Group were not available for testing in K121863.
bioMérieux included the following limitation in the device labeling:
"The ability of the AST card to detect resistance with the following combination(s) is unknown because resistant strains were either not available or an insufficient number were encountered at the time of comparative testing:
- Cefotaxime (ctx01n): Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A β-hemolytic streptococci) and Streptococcus spp β-hemolytic Group (other than S. pyogenes)".
Cefotaxime current interpretative criteria does not have intermediate or resistant interpretive criteria for Streptococcus spp β-Hemolytic Group (including S. pyogenes).
bioMérieux also added the following footnote under the performance Table in the device labeling:
"NS-The current absence of resistant isolates precludes defining any results other than "Susceptible". Isolates yielding MIC results suggestive of NonSusceptible category should be submitted to a reference laboratory for further testing".
K210287 - Page 11 of 14
{11}
# Trending
A trending re-analysis was performed using the combined (challenge and clinical) data obtained in K121863 from the VITEK 2 auto-dilution method for all Streptococcus spp to align with current trending analysis.
This trending calculation takes into account the MIC values that are determined to be one or more doubling dilutions lower or higher than the reference method irrespective of whether the device MIC values are on-scale or not. Results that are not clearly at least one dilution lower, at least one dilution higher or in exact agreement with the CLSI reference method are not considered in the trending analysis.
When the difference between the percentage of isolates with higher vs. lower readings was greater than 30% and for which the confidence interval was determined to be statistically significant were considered to show evidence of trending. Trending that showed higher or lower MIC values compared to the reference is addressed in the labeling.
The evaluation of the MIC results for Streptococcus spp (Viridans Group) using auto dilution on the VITEK 2 instrument showed a trend toward lower MIC values when compared to the reference method (Table 5). No trending was observed with Streptococcus pneumoniae (meningitis and non-meningitis breakpoints), Streptococcus spp (beta-Hemolytic Group) and S. pyogenes (Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci) (Table 5).
Table 5. Trending Re-Analysis for Streptococcus spp with Cefotaxime and the VITEK 2 Automated Dilution
| Organism | Total Evaluable for Trending | ≥ 1 Dilution lower No. (%) | Exact No. (%) | ≥ 1 Dilution Higher No. (%) | Percent Difference (CI)* | Trending Noted |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Viridans Group | 202 | 104 | 65 | 33 | -35.1% (-43.3%, -26.2%) | Yes |
| S. pyogenes | 0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Streptococcus spp Beta-Hemolytic Group (other than S. pyogenes) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -100% (-100%, 12.21%) | No |
| S. pneumoniae-meningitis | 132 | 22 | 60 | 50 | 21.2% (10.5%, 31.3%) | No |
| S. penumoniae-non meningitis | 132 | 22 | 60 | 50 | 21.2% (10.5%, 31.3%) | No |
*A positive percent difference value indicates higher MIC when compared to the reference method; A negative percent difference value indicates lower MIC when compared to the reference method.
To address the observed trending, bioMérieux included the following footnote to the performance table in the device labeling:
"The VITEK 2 Cefotaxime MIC values for Streptococcus spp Viridans Group tended to be at least one doubling dilution lower than the reference method and may contribute to the occurrence of very major errors".
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not Applicable
K210287 - Page 12 of 14
{12}
# C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not Applicable
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not Applicable
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Not Applicable
# D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not Applicable.
# E Expected Values/Reference Range:
The FDA recognized susceptibility interpretive criteria for Cefotaxime are listed in Table 6
Table 6: FDA Recognized Interpretative Criteria for Cefotaxime
| Pathogen | Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (μg/mL)1 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | S | I | R |
| S. pneumoniae (meningitis) | ≤0.5 | 1 | ≥2 |
| S. pneumoniae (non-meningitis) | ≤1 | 2 | ≥4 |
| Streptococcus spp Beta-Hemolytic Group2 | ≤0.5 | - | - |
| Streptococcus spp Viridans Group | ≤1 | 2 | ≥4 |
S = Susceptible; I = Intermediate; R = Resistant
$^{1}$ FDA-Recognized Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Interpretive Criteria Website https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/ucm410971.htm
2Includes S. pyogenes (Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci) and other $\beta$ -hemolytic streptococci other than S. pyogenes.
K210287 - Page 13 of 14
{13}
K210287 - Page 14 of 14
VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device when evaluated with the current FDA-recognized Cefotaxime breakpoints.
IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
To support the implementation of changes to FDA-recognized susceptibility test interpretive criteria (i.e., breakpoints), this submission included a breakpoint change protocol that was reviewed and accepted by FDA. This protocol addresses future revisions to device labeling in response to breakpoint changes that are recognized on the FDA STIC webpage (https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/ucm410971.htm). The protocol outlined the specific procedures and acceptance criteria that bioMérieux intends to use to evaluate the VITEK 2 System with Cefotaxime when revised breakpoints for Cefotaxime are published on the FDA STIC webpage. The breakpoint change protocol included with the submission indicated that if specific criteria are met, BioMérieux will update the Cefotaxime device label to include (1) the new breakpoints, (2) an updated performance section after re-evaluation of data in this premarket notification with the new breakpoints, and (3) any new limitations as determined by their evaluation.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.