Psychemedics Homogeneous Enzyme Immunoassay for Amphetamines in Hair
K210212 · Psychemedics Corporation · LAF · Dec 15, 2021 · Clinical Toxicology
Device Facts
Record ID
K210212
Device Name
Psychemedics Homogeneous Enzyme Immunoassay for Amphetamines in Hair
Applicant
Psychemedics Corporation
Product Code
LAF · Clinical Toxicology
Decision Date
Dec 15, 2021
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.3610
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Psychemedics homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (HEIA) for amphetamines in hair is an enzyme immunoassay system for the preliminary qualitative detection of methamphetamine in human head and body hair using a methamphetamine calibrator at 3 ng methamphetamine/10 mg hair or 5 ng methamphetamine/10 mg hair for the purpose of identifying methamphetamine use, and for the preliminary qualitative detection of amphetamine in human head and body hair using an amphetamine calibrator at 3 ng amphetamine/10 mg hair for the purpose of identifying amphetamine use. This is an in vitro diagnostic device intended exclusively for Psychemedics use only and is not for sale to anyone. The Psychemedics HEIA for amphetamines in hair provides only a preliminary analytical test result. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) is the preferred confirmatory method.
Device Story
Device performs preliminary qualitative screening for amphetamine and methamphetamine in human head/body hair. Process involves pre-analytical hair extraction into liquid matrix followed by homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (HEIA) on automated clinical chemistry analyzer. Assay utilizes competition between drug-labeled G6PDH and free drug from hair extract for fixed antibody binding sites; spectrophotometric measurement at 340 nm determines enzyme activity inversely proportional to drug concentration. Presumptive positives require confirmation via LC/MS/MS using AB Sciex 3200 system. Intended for use by Psychemedics laboratory personnel. Output provides preliminary analytical result for drug identification, necessitating confirmatory testing for clinical decision-making. Benefits include rapid screening of hair samples for drug use identification.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical studies performed. Evidence consists of analytical performance data including precision (intra-assay and inter-assay), cross-reactivity, interference studies, and method comparison against LC/MS/MS confirmation. Precision studies showed %CVs generally <6%. Method comparison demonstrated high agreement between HEIA screening results and LC/MS/MS confirmation.
Technological Characteristics
System comprises reagents (anti-drug monoclonal antibody, drug-labeled recombinant G6PDH) and automated clinical chemistry analyzer (Olympus AU 640). Measurement principle: competitive enzyme immunoassay, spectrophotometric detection at 340 nm. Confirmatory system: AB Sciex 3200 LC/MS/MS with LC-20AD pumps and LEAP PAL HTC-xt autosampler. Extraction: acidic aqueous buffer. Qualitative test.
Indications for Use
Indicated for preliminary qualitative detection of methamphetamine and amphetamine in human head and body hair to identify drug use. Intended for use by Psychemedics only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A methamphetamine test system is a device intended to measure methamphetamine, a central nervous system stimulating drug, in serum, plasma, and urine. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of methamphetamine use or overdose.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). A methamphetamine test system is not exempt if it is intended for any use other than employment or insurance testing or is intended for Federal drug testing programs. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9, provided the test system is intended for employment and insurance testing and includes a statement in the labeling that the device is intended solely for use in employment and insurance testing, and does not include devices intended for Federal drug testing programs (*e.g.,* programs run by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. military).
Predicate Devices
Psychemedics Microplate EIA for Methamphetamine in Hair (k111927)
Psychemedics Microplate EIA for Amphetamine in Hair (k130811)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K210212
B Applicant
Psychemedics Corporation
C Proprietary and Established Names
Psychemedics Homogeneous Enzyme Immunoassay for Amphetamines in Hair
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LAF | Class II | 21 CFR 862.3610 - Methamphetamine Test System | TX - Clinical Toxicology |
| DKZ | Class II | 21 CFR 862.3100 - Amphetamine test system | TX - Clinical Toxicology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
New Device
B Measurand:
Amphetamine and Methamphetamine
C Type of Test:
Qualitative Homogeneous Enzyme Immunoassay (HEIA)
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
K210212 - Page 2 of 16
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
### A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
### B Indication(s) for Use:
The Psychemedics homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (HEIA) for amphetamines in hair is an enzyme immunoassay system for the preliminary qualitative detection of methamphetamine in human head and body hair using a methamphetamine calibrator at 3 ng methamphetamine/10 mg hair or 5 ng methamphetamine/10 mg hair for the purpose of identifying methamphetamine use, and for the preliminary qualitative detection of amphetamine in human head and body hair using an amphetamine calibrator at 3 ng amphetamine/10 mg hair for the purpose of identifying amphetamine use. This is an in vitro diagnostic device intended exclusively for Psychemedics use only and is not for sale to anyone.
The Psychemedics HEIA Amphetamines Assay provides only a preliminary analytical test result. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical test result. Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) is the preferred confirmatory method.
### C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
OTC - Over The Counter
### D Special Instrument Requirements:
The Olympus AU 640 analyzer was used for validation of the candidate assay.
The confirmation assay uses an AB Sciex 3200 LC/MS/MS linked to two LC-20AD Prominence Liquid Chromatograph Pumps and a LEAP PAL HTC-xt autosampler.
## IV Device/System Characteristics:
### A Device Description:
The Psychemedics homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (HEIA) test for amphetamines in hair consists of two parts; a pre-analytical hair treatment procedure (to extract amphetamines or methamphetamines from the solid hair matrix to a measurable liquid matrix) and the screening assay, the Psychemedics Amphetamines HEIA.
The Psychemedics Amphetamines HEIA consists of reagents R1 (anti-methamphetamine monoclonal antibody with substrate) and R2 (methamphetamine labeled recombinant G6PDH) for the detection of methamphetamine, and reagents R1 (anti-amphetamine monoclonal antibody with substrate) and R2 (amphetamine labeled recombinant G6PDH) for the detection of amphetamine.
The confirmation assay consists of an AB Sciex 3200 LC/MS/MS linked to two LC-20AD Prominence Liquid Chromatograph Pumps and a LEAP PAL HTC-xt autosampler.
{2}
K210212 - Page 3 of 16
## B Principle of Operation:
Hair sample extracts are combined with methamphetamine antibody and methamphetamine-labeled G6PDH and amphetamine antibody and amphetamine-labeled G6PDH using a chemistry autoanalyzer. The assay is based on competition between the drug-labeled G6PDH and free drug from the extracted hair sample for a fixed amount of specific antibody binding sites. In the absence of free drug from the samples, the specific antibody binds the drug-labeled G6PDH and causes a decrease in enzyme activity. This phenomenon creates a direct relationship between the drug concentration in hair and enzyme activity. The enzyme activity is determined spectrophotometrically at 340 nm.
For samples that are presumptive positive by the screening assay, a new aliquot of the hair sample is weighed, washed extensively to remove externally derived methamphetamine and amphetamine, extracted by a different procedure and confirmed by LC/MS/MS for the presence of methamphetamine and amphetamine.
## V Substantial Equivalence Information:
### A Predicate Device Name(s):
Psychemedics Microplate EIA For Amphetamine in Hair, Psychemedics Microplate EIA for Methamphetamine in Hair
### B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K130811, K111927
### C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K210212 | K130811 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Psychemedics homogeneous enzyme immunoassay for amphetamine in hair | Psychemedics Microplate EIA for Amphetamine in Hair |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | Preliminary qualitative detection of amphetamine in human head and body hair using an amphetamine calibrator of 3 ng/10 mg hair for the purpose of identifying amphetamine use | Same |
| Measurand | Amphetamine | Same |
| Sample Matrix | Human Hair | Same |
{3}
K210212 - Page 4 of 16
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K210212 | K130811 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Type of Test | Enzyme Immunoassay | Same |
| Confirmation Method | LC/MS/MS | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Method of Measurement | Automated Clinical Chemistry Analyzer at 340 nm | Microplate Reader at 450 nm |
| Extraction Method | Acidic aqueous buffer | Patented Digestion Method |
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K210212 | K111927 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Psychemedics homogeneous enzyme immunoassay for amphetamine in hair | Psychemedics Microplate EIA for Methamphetamine in hair |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | Preliminary qualitative detection of methamphetamine in human head and body hair using a methamphetamine calibrator of 3 ng/10 mg hair or 5 ng/10 mg hair for the purpose of identifying methamphetamine use. | Same |
| Measurand | Methamphetamine | Same |
| Sample Matrix | Human Hair | Same |
| Type of Test | Enzyme Immunoassay | Same |
| Confirmation Method | LC/MS/MS | Same |
{4}
K210212 - Page 5 of 16
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K210212 | K111927 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Method of Measurement | Automated Clinical Chemistry Analyzer at 340 nm | Microplate Reader at 450 nm |
| Extraction Method | Acidic aqueous buffer | Patented Digestion Method |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
None provided.
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision studies were performed by spiking negative hair with previously LC/MS/MS validated calibrator and control solutions to achieve concentrations of negative, the cutoff calibrator of 3 ng methamphetamine/10 mg hair, 5 ng methamphetamine/10 mg hair, or 3 ng amphetamine/10 mg hair, and +/- 75%, +/-50% and +/-25% of the cutoff calibrator.
| Candidate Assay Methamphetamine Reagents Intra-Assay and Inter-Assay Precision Summary, 3 ng Methamphetamine/10 mg Hair Calibrator | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Summary Intra-Assay Precision | | | Summary Inter-Assay Precision | | |
| Level | NEG | POS | Level | NEG | POS |
| -100% | 8 | 0 | -100% | 80 | 0 |
| -75% | 8 | 0 | -75% | 80 | 0 |
| -50% | 8 | 0 | -50% | 80 | 0 |
| -25% | 8 | 0 | -25% | 80 | 0 |
| +25% | 0 | 8 | +25% | 0 | 80 |
| +50 | 0 | 8 | +50 | 0 | 80 |
| +75% | 0 | 8 | +75% | 0 | 80 |
| +100% | 0 | 8 | +100% | 0 | 80 |
{5}
| Candidate Assay Methamphetamine Reagents Intra-Assay and Inter-Assay Precision Summary, 5 ng Methamphetamine/10 mg Hair Calibrator | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Summary Intra-Assay Precision | | | Summary Inter-Assay Precision | | |
| Level | NEG | POS | Level | NEG | POS |
| -100% | 8 | 0 | -100% | 80 | 0 |
| -75% | 8 | 0 | -75% | 80 | 0 |
| -50% | 8 | 0 | -50% | 80 | 0 |
| -25% | 8 | 0 | -25% | 80 | 0 |
| +25% | 0 | 8 | +25% | 0 | 80 |
| +50 | 0 | 8 | +50 | 0 | 80 |
| +75% | 0 | 8 | +75% | 0 | 80 |
| +100% | 0 | 8 | +100% | 0 | 80 |
| Candidate Assay Amphetamine Reagents Intra-Assay and Inter-Assay Precision Summary | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Summary Intra-Assay Precision | | | Summary Inter-Assay Precision | | |
| Level | NEG | POS | Level | NEG | POS |
| -100% | 8 | 0 | -100% | 80 | 0 |
| -75% | 8 | 0 | -75% | 80 | 0 |
| -50% | 8 | 0 | -50% | 80 | 0 |
| -25% | 8 | 0 | -25% | 80 | 0 |
| +25% | 0 | 8 | +25% | 0 | 80 |
| +50 | 0 | 8 | +50 | 0 | 80 |
| +75% | 0 | 8 | +75% | 0 | 80 |
| +100% | 0 | 8 | +100% | 0 | 80 |
Precision Studies for LC-MS/MS
Intra-assay Precision Around the Cutoff: 3 ng of Methamphetamine and Amphetamine per 10 mg Hair
Intra-assay precision was determined around the cutoff of 3 ng methamphetamine and amphetamine per 10 mg hair at each of the following concentrations: 50%, 75%, 100%, 125% and 150%. The concentrations of amphetamines evaluated for intra-assay precision around the cutoff were: 1.5, 2.25, 3.0, 3.75 and 4.5 ng analyte per 10 mg hair. The concentrations of amphetamines evaluated for intra-assay precision from LLOQ to ULOQ were: 0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, 3.0, 5.0, 10.0, 25.0 and 50 ng analyte per 10 mg hair.
K210212 - Page 6 of 16
{6}
K210212 - Page 7 of 16
| Intra-assay Precision Around the 3 ng Analyte per 10 mg Hair Cutoff | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | ng analyte/10 mg hair | | | | |
| Methamphetamine | 1.5 | 2.25 | 3.0 | 3.75 | 4.5 |
| Average | 1.424 | 2.148 | 2.73 | 3.406 | 4.14 |
| S.D | 0.044 | 0.013 | 0.071 | 0.115 | 0.135 |
| %C.V. | 3.085 | 0.607 | 2.590 | 3.364 | 3.272 |
| | | | | | |
| Amphetamine | 1.50 | 2.25 | 3.00 | 3.75 | 4.50 |
| Average | 1.534 | 2.234 | 3.036 | 3.732 | 4.492 |
| S.D | 0.057 | 0.077 | 0.092 | 0.066 | 0.207 |
| %C.V. | 3.705 | 3.447 | 3.015 | 1.781 | 4.599 |
Intra-assay precision over the range of the assay for methamphetamine and amphetamine is provided in the following table.
| Intra-assay Precision Over the Range of the Assay | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | ng analyte/10 mg hair | | | | | | | |
| Meth | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 25.0 | 50.0 |
| Average | 0.264 | 0.537 | 1.0208 | 2.88 | 5.002 | 10.82 | 25.16 | 46.34 |
| S.D | 0.0080 | 0.0153 | 0.0283 | 0.0982 | 0.0642 | 0.4550 | 0.6465 | 0.9965 |
| %C.V. | 3.05 | 2.85 | 2.78 | 3.41 | 1.28 | 4.20 | 2.57 | 2.15 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Amp | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 25.0 | 50.0 |
| Average | 0.261 | 0.529 | 0.980 | 2.81 | 4.822 | 10.92 | 25.98 | 48.14 |
| S.D | 0.0120 | 0.0167 | 0.0321 | 0.1166 | 0.2461 | 0.3194 | 0.2490 | 0.9762 |
| %C.V. | 4.61 | 3.15 | 3.28 | 4.15 | 5.10 | 2.92 | 0.96 | 2.03 |
Inter-assay Precision Around the Cutoff: 3 ng of Methamphetamine and Amphetamine per 10 mg Hair
Inter-assay precision around the cutoff was determined at 1.5, 3.0 and 4.5 ng analyte per 10 mg of hair. Inter-assay precision was performed over 5 separate days, testing each respective sample concentration in quintuplicate. Inter-assay Precision of the 3 ng analyte per 10 mg Hair cutoff for methamphetamine and amphetamine is provided in the following table.
| Inter-assay Precision | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ng Analyte/10 mg hair | | | | | | |
| | Methamphetamine | | | Amphetamine | | |
| | 1.5 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 4.5 |
| Avg | 1.49 | 2.95 | 4.35 | 1.47 | 2.98 | 4.36 |
| S.D. | 0.0759 | 0.1614 | 0.1825 | 0.0809 | 0.1061 | 0.2265 |
| %CV | 5.08 | 5.47 | 4.20 | 5.51 | 3.56 | 5.20 |
{7}
Intra-assay Precision Around the Cutoff: 5 ng of Methamphetamine per 10 mg Hair
The concentrations of 5 methamphetamine samples evaluated for intra-assay precision around the cutoff were: 2.5, 3.75, 5.0, 6.25 and 7.5 ng analyte per 10 mg hair. The concentrations of amphetamines evaluated for intra-assay precision from LLOQ to ULOQ were the same as those evaluated for the 3 ng of methamphetamine per 10 mg hair cutoff.
| Intra-Assay Precision Around the 5 ng Cutoff | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ng analyte/10 mg hair | | | | | |
| | 2.5 | 3.75 | 5.0 | 6.25 | 7.5 |
| Avg. | 2.52 | 3.77 | 5.05 | 6.09 | 7.15 |
| S.D. | 0.086 | 0.066 | 0.118 | 0.224 | 0.147 |
| %CV | 3.402 | 1.764 | 2.329 | 3.669 | 2.061 |
Inter-assay precision around the 5 ng/10 mg hair cutoff for methamphetamine is shown in the following table.
| Inter-assay Precision around the 5 ng Cutoff | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Methamphetamine | | | |
| ng analyte/10 mg hair | | | |
| | 2.5 | 5.0 | 7.5 |
| Average | 2.42 | 4.93 | 7.14 |
| S.D. | 0.105 | 0.155 | 0.270 |
| %CV | 4.32 | 3.15 | 3.78 |
2. Linearity:
The screening immunoassays are qualitative tests. An evaluation of linearity is not applicable.
LC-MS/MS Linearity:
The following concentrations were analyzed: 0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, 3.0, 5.0, 10.0, 25.0 and 50 ng methamphetamine and amphetamine per 10 mg of hair.
All results were within 20% of the target concentrations. Agreement of the 5 determinations at each concentration was ≤10% CV. The regression coefficient was >0.995. The actual data points deviated <20% from the regression line.
The LC-MS/MS assay is used only to determine if the concentration of the target analyte is above or below the cutoff. There are no clinical claims for concentrations other than the cutoff.
K210212 - Page 8 of 16
{8}
K210212 - Page 9 of 16
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
Cross Reactivity:
Samples consisting of 8 mg hair were added to various compounds to determine cross reactivity. Structurally similar compounds were tested individually in the candidate assay using the methamphetamine and amphetamine reagents to an expected cross reactivity of 1% (e.g., for the 5 ng methamphetamine/10 mg hair calibrator to 500 ng cross reactor/10 mg hair, for the 3 ng methamphetamine or amphetamine/10 mg hair calibrator to 300 ng cross reactor/10 mg hair). Structurally similar compounds that cross reacted at 1% were then tested at decreasing concentrations until the compound produced a positive result against the methamphetamine or amphetamine calibrator. Structurally dissimilar compounds (100 ng/10 mg hair) were tested individually as cross-reactants in the candidate assay using the methamphetamine and amphetamine reagents.
The cross-reactivity of the following metabolites and methamphetamines structural analogs was evaluated by determining the minimum concentration that would result approximately equivalent to the 3.0 ng methamphetamine/10 mg hair and 5.0 ng methamphetamine/10 mg cutoffs.
| Cross Reactivities, Methamphetamine 3 ng/10 mg Calibrator, Structurally Related Compounds and Metabolites | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Compound | % Cross Reactivity | Concentration Equivalent to 3.0 ng Methamphetamine/10 mg Hair |
| MDMA | 81 | 3.7 |
| Para-Methoxy Methamphetamine | 50 | 6.0 |
| 1R, 2S Ephedrine | 20 | 15 |
| MDEA | 12 | 25 |
| R-Methamphetamine | 2 | 150 |
| D-Amphetamine | <1 | >300 |
| L-Amphetamine | <1 | >300 |
| MDA | <1 | >300 |
| Para-methoxy Amphetamine | <1 | >300 |
| Cross Reactivities, Methamphetamine 5 ng/10 mg Calibrator, Structurally Related Compounds and Metabolites | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Compound | % Cross Reactivity | Concentration Equivalent to 5.0 ng Methamphetamine/10 mg Hair |
| MDMA | 83 | 6 |
| Para-Methoxy Methamphetamine | 50 | 10 |
{9}
| Cross Reactivities, Methamphetamine 5 ng/10 mg Calibrator, Structurally Related Compounds and Metabolites | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Compound | % Cross Reactivity | Concentration Equivalent to 5.0 ng Methamphetamine/10 mg Hair |
| 1R, 2S Ephedrine | 20 | 25 |
| MDEA | 10 | 50 |
| R-(-)-Methamphetamine | 2 | 175 |
| D-Amphetamine | <1 | >500 |
| L-Amphetamine | <1 | >500 |
| MDA | <1 | >500 |
| Para-methoxy Amphetamine | <1 | >500 |
The sponsor did not observe cross reactivity in the candidate assay using the methamphetamine reagents with the following compounds:
Anhydroecgonine Methyl Ester, Atropine, Bupropion, Cotinine, Cannabinol, Chlorpheniramine maleate, O-Desmethylvenlafaxine, Desipramine, Doxylamine succinate, 1S, 2R Ephedrine, Naproxen, Nicotine, Nortriptyline, H-Propoxyphene, R,R-Pseudoephedrine, Thioridazine, Cis-Tramadol, Venlafaxine, $(\pm)$-11-nor-9-Carboxy- $\Delta$ 9-THC, Pentazocine, Amoxicillin, Propranolol, Promethazine, Phenmetrazine, Phendimetrazine, Benzocaine, Ecgonine, Dextromethorphan, Amitriptyline, R-(-)-Phenylephrine, Glutethimide, Meprobamate, Lidocaine, Carbamazepine, Diazepam, Nordiazepam, AM-2201, JWH-019, JWH-081, JWH-122, Acetaminophen, Caffeine, Dyphylline, Methaqualone, Theophylline, CP47.497, CP47.497 C8 Homologue, HU-211, JWH-200, JWH-250, Ibuprofen, Naproxen, Ethosuximide, $(\pm)$-Epinephrine, Norepinephrine, Barbital, Metanephrine, Normetanephrine, Methocarbamol, Alprazolam, Cimoticine, Citalopram, Clopidogrel Bisulfate, Fluconazole, Hydrochlorothiazide, Lamotrigine, L-Thyroxine, Methyl Phenidate, Omeprazole, Amlodipine Besylate, Atorvastatin, Azithromycin, Bupivacaine, Cetirizine, Dimenhydrinate, Lisinopril, Methsuximide, Phensuximide, N-Normethyl Suximide, Butabarbital, Amobarbital, Secobarbital, Hexobarbital, Phenobarbital, Mephyton, Ethotoin, Mephobarbital, PEMA, 10, 11-Dihydrocarbamazepine, Medazepam, Chlorpromazine, Flurazepam, Lorazepam, Temazepam, Bromazepam, Primidone, 5,5-Diphenyl Hydantoin, Triamterene, Nordoxepin, Oxazepam, Levitriacetam, Metformin, Phenytoin, R-Phenylephrine, Sertraline, Topiramate, Zolpidem Tartrate, Vanilmandelic Acid, 5-Hydroxy Indole-3-Acetic Acid, Homovanilic Acid.
The cross reactivity of the following metabolites and amphetamines structural analogs was evaluated by determining the minimum concentration that would result approximately equivalent to the $3.0\mathrm{ng}$ amphetamine/10 mg hair cutoff.
K210212 - Page 10 of 16
{10}
| Cross Reactivities of Structurally Related Compounds and Metabolites | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Compound | % Cross Reactivity | Concentration Equivalent to 3.0 ng Amphetamine/10 mg Hair |
| MDA | 100 | 3.0 |
| Phentermine | 25 | 12 |
| D-Methamphetamine | <1 | >300 |
| MDMA | <1 | >300 |
| Phenmetrazine | <1 | >300 |
| 1R, 2S Ephedrine | <1 | >300 |
The sponsor did not observe cross reactivity in the candidate assay using the amphetamine reagents with the following compounds:
Anhydroecgonine Methyl Ester, Atropine, Bupropion, Cotinine, Cannabinol, Chlorpheniramine maleate, O-Desmethylvenlafaxine, Desipramine, Doxylamine succinate, 1S, 2R Ephedrine, Naproxen, Nicotine, Nortriptyline, H-Propoxyphene, R,R-Pseudoephedrine, Thioridazine, Cis-Tramadol, Venlafaxine, $(\pm)$-11-nor-9-Carboxy-$\Delta$9-THC, Pentazocine, Amoxicillin, Propranolol, Promethazine, Phenmetrazine, Phendimetrazine, Benzocaine, Ecgonine, Dextromethorphan, Amitriptyline, R-(-)-Phenylephrine, Glutethimide, Meprobamate, Lidocaine, Carbamazepine, Diazepam, Nordiazepam, AM-2201, JWH-019, JWH-081, JWH-122, Acetaminophen, Caffeine, Dyphylline, Methaqualone, Theophylline, CP47.497, CP47.497 C8 Homologue, HU-211, JWH-200, JWH-250, Ibuprofen, Naproxen, Ethosuximide, $(\pm)$-Epinephrine, Norepinephrine, Barbital, Metanephrine, Normetanephrine, Methocarbamol, Alprazolam, Cimoticine, Citalopram, Clopidogrel Bisulfate, Fluconazole, Hydrochlorothiazide, Lamotrigine, L-Thyroxine, Methyl Phenidate, Omeprazole, Amlodipine Besylate, Atorvastatin, Azithromycin, Bupivacaine, Cetirizine, Dimenhydrinate, Lisinopril, Methsuximide, Phensuximide, N-Normethyl Suximide, Butabarbital, Amobarbital, Secobarbital, Hexobarbital, Phenobarbital, Mephyton, Ethotoin, Mephobarbital, PEMA, 10, 11-Dihydrocarbamazepine, Medazepam, Chlorpromazine, Flurazepam, Lorazepam, Temazepam, Bromazepam, Primidone, 5,5-Diphenyl Hydantoin, Triamterene, Nordoxepin, Oxazepam, Levitriacetam, Metformin, Phenytoin, R-Phenylephrine, Sertraline, Topiramate, Zolpidem Tartrate, Vanilmandelic Acid, 5-Hydroxy Indole-3-Acetic Acid, Homovanilic Acid.
## Interference Studies
The following compounds (100 ng/10 mg hair) were tested at the methamphetamine cutoff at 3 ng and 5 ng/10 mg hair, the amphetamine cutoff of 3 ng analyte per 10 mg hair, and at +/- 50% of these cutoffs to determine which of them might interfere in the assay and to what degree and were found to have no interference with the candidate assay using the methamphetamine and amphetamine reagents.
K210212 - Page 11 of 16
{11}
Anhydroecgonine Methyl Ester, Atropine, Bupropion, Cotinine, Cannabinol, Chlorpheniramine maleate, O-Desmethylvenlafaxine, Desipiramine, Doxylamine Succinate, 1S, 2R-Ephedrine, Naproxen, Nicotine, Nortriptyline, Propoxyphene, R,R-Pseudoephedrine, Thioridazine, Cis-Tramadol, Venlafaxine HCl, 8-(-)-11-nor-9-caroxy-delta-9 THC, 11-nor-9-carboxy-delta-9 THC, Amoxicillin, Propanolol, Promethazine, Phenmetrazine, Phendimetrazine, Benzocaine, Ecgonine, Metanephrin, Glutethimide, Meprobamate, Methyprylon, Carbamazepine, Diazepam, Nordiazepam, Oxazepam, Acetaminophen, Caffeine, Dyphylline, Methaqualone, Theophylline, Amitryptiline, Dextromethorphan, Lidocaine, Methocarbamol, Nordoxepin, Pentazocine, Phenylephrine, Triamterene, Ethosuximide, α-Methyl-α-propylsuccinimide, Metharbital, Barbital, Methsuximide, Phensuximide, N-Normethylsuximide, Mephenytoin, Ethyton, Mephobarbital, PEMA, Phenobarbital, Methyl PEMA, 10, 11-Dihydrocarbamazepine, Primidone, Carbamazepine, 5,5-Diphenylhydantoin, 4-Methylprimidone, Glutethimide, Methaqualone, Chlorpromazine, Flurazepam, AM-2201, JWH-019, JWH-081, JWH-122, CP47, 497 (±), CP 47, 497 (±) C8 Homologue, HU-211, JWH-200, JWH-250, Acetominophen, Caffeine, Chlorpheniramine, Ibuprofen, Naproxen, R,R-(-)-Pseudoephedrine, Epinephrine (±), Norepinephrine (±), normetanephrine (±), Alprazolam, Cimetidine, Citalopram HBr, Clonazepam, Clopidogrel Bisulfate, Fluconazole, Hydrochlorothiazide, Lamotrigine, L-Thyroxine, Methylphenidate HCl, Omeprazole, Amlopidine Besylate, Atorvastatin Calcium Salt, Azithromycin Dihydrate, Bupivacaine HCl, Cetirizine Di-HCl, Dimenhydrinate, Lisinopril Dihydrate, Butabarbital, Amobarbital, Secobarbital, Hexobarbital, Medazepam, Lorazepam, Temazepam, Bromazepam, Carbamazepine, Levetiracetam, Metformin HCl, Phenobarbital, Phenytoin, R-(-)-Phenylephrine HCl, Sertraline HCl, Topiramate, Zolpidem Tartrate, Zonisamide, 11-nor-9-caroxy-delta-8 THC, Streptomycin Solution, Procaine, Erythromycin, Penicillin G, Mepivacaine, Vanilmandelic Acid (±), 5-Hydroxyindole-3-Acetic Acid, Homovanilic Acid.
## Immunoassay: Effect of cosmetic treatments
Head hair samples negative for methamphetamines and amphetamines and head hair samples positive for methamphetamines and amphetamines were treated with the following cosmetic treatments: permanent wave, relaxer, dye (which includes bleach), and shampoo. The study included 5 amphetamines-negative samples and 4 amphetamines-positive samples with each of the treatments along with 5 methamphetamines-negative and 4 methamphetamines-positive samples with the exception of permed methamphetamines negative samples which contained 4 negative samples. The results were compared to the same samples without treatments. All of the positive samples were previously analyzed by the confirmation procedure for amphetamines and methamphetamines. After the treatments these samples and an aliquot of the same hair samples untreated were extracted for amphetamines and methamphetamines analysis and then assayed by the candidate assay using the methamphetamine and amphetamine reagents. The results with and without treatment are compared to detect interference in the assay or loss of drug due to the treatments. No negative samples turned positive, and no positive samples became negative.
K210212 - Page 12 of 16
{12}
# Specificity of the LC-MS/MS method
An interference study was conducted for the LC-MS/MS method by spiking potential interferents into negative hair specimens that did not contain any drug, and individually into hair specimens containing drug. Two aliquots of each compound or mix of compounds were analyzed with 2.0 ng methamphetamine and 1.2 ng amphetamine per 10 mg hair, and one without methamphetamine and amphetamine. The sponsor concluded that the potentially interfering compounds listed below did not cross-react or cause interference with the LC-MS/MS assay.
The following compound was tested at 2000 ng/10mg hair: Warfarin.
The following compounds were tested at 500 ng/10mg hair: Gabapentin, Pregabalin, Salicylic Acid, Valproic Acid, Vigabatrin, Acetaminophen, (-)-Cotinine, S-(-)-Nicotine, Caffeine.
The following compounds were tested at 200 ng/10mg hair: Morphine, Oxycodone, Codeine, Cocaine, Phencyclidine, S-(+)-Methamphetamine, S-(+) Amphetamine, (±)-Methadone, Phenobarbital, Phenytoin, R-(-)-Phenylephrine HCl, Carbamazepine, Salicylic Acid, Valproic Acid, Oxcarbazepine, Buprenorphine, Cis-Tramadol HCl, Hydrocodone, Hydromorphone, Meperidine, Naloxone, Naltrexone, Oxymorphone, Aripiprazole, Lacosamide, Oxocarbazepine, Rufinamide.
The following compounds were tested at 100 ng/10mg hair: Carbamazepine, Levetiracetam, Metformin HCl, Phenobarbital, Phenytoin, R-(-)-Phenylephrine HCl, Sertraline HCl, Topiramate, Zolpidem Tartrate, Zonisamide, Carbamazepine, Levetiracetam, (+)-Propoxyphene.
The following compounds were tested at 50ng/10mg hair: Atorvastatin·Ca Salt, Azithromycin·2 H₂O, Bupivacaine HCl·H₂O, Dimenhydrinate, Lisinopril·2H₂O, Loratadine, Montelukast·Na Salt, Pioglitazone·HCl, Procainamide·HCl, Simvastatin, Ibuprofen, Naproxen, (+)-Propoxyphene.
The following compounds were tested at 25ng/10mg hair: Cetirizine·2HCl, Prednisolone.
The following compounds were tested at 20ng/10 mg hair: Clonazepam, Estazolam, Flurazepam, Flunitrazepam, Midazolam, Nitrazepam, Prazepam, Triazolam, Zolpidem, Phentermine, R, R-(-)-Pseudoephedrine, Meprobamate, Ibuprofen, Naproxen, Fentanyl.
The following compounds were tested at 2.5ng/10mg hair: Amlopidine Besylate
4. Assay Reportable Range:
An assay reportable range is not applicable for the candidate assay using the methamphetamine and amphetamine reagents because they are qualitative only.
K210212 - Page 13 of 16
{13}
The claimed reportable range for the analytes methamphetamine and amphetamine measured by the LC-MS/MS method are as follows: 0.25 ng/10 mg hair to 50 ng/10mg of hair.
This reportable range is supported by the linearity, precision, and lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) studies.
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
Traceability: The methamphetamine and amphetamine calibrators are traceable to certified reference materials from a commercial source.
Sample Shipping Stability During Storage: Nine (9) methamphetamine positive samples remained positive after approximately 8 months in storage and after shipping twice coast to coast. Nine (9) amphetamine positive samples remained positive after approximately 6 months in storage and after shipping twice coast to coast.
6. Detection Limit:
The candidate screening test yield qualitative results only; therefore, a detection limit evaluation is not applicable. See section VII.A.1. above for performance around the candidate device cutoff.
Detection Limit of the LC-MS/MS method
The sponsor performed a study to determine the Lower limit of Quantitation (LLOQ) of the confirmatory LC-MS/MS assay for amphetamine and methamphetamine.
The LLOQ is the lowest claimed concentration that can be quantitated within 20% of the expected value for methamphetamine and amphetamine. This was found to be 0.25 ng/10 mg hair for methamphetamine and amphetamine.
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Refer to Precision Studies above.
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
Methamphetamine, 3 ng methamphetamine/10 mg hair calibrator
Samples positive or negative for methamphetamine were tested with the candidate assay using the methamphetamine reagents.
K210212 - Page 14 of 16
{14}
The hair samples were then tested using Psychemedics' LC/MS/MS confirmatory assay, to compare the Psychemedics HEIA results with the LC/MS/MS results. The studies documented the source of hair (head or body) and other demographics to include gender and hair color. The comparison of the candidate device using the methamphetamine reagent at the 3 ng/10 mg hair calibrator with LC/MS/MS is shown in the following table.
| HEIA Result | LC/MS/MS Result, ng Methamphetamine/10 mg hair (% of cutoff calibrator) | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | < 1.5 (< 50% below cutoff) | 1.5 – 2.99 (≥ 50% below cutoff to cutoff) | 3.0 – 4.5 (cutoff to ≥ 50% above cutoff) | > 4.5 (> 50% above cutoff) |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 6 | 50 |
| Negative | 53 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
## Methamphetamine, 5 ng methamphetamine/10 mg hair calibrator
Samples positive or negative for methamphetamine were tested with the candidate assay using the methamphetamine reagents.
The hair samples were then tested using Psychemedics' LC/MS/MS confirmatory assay, to compare the Psychemedics HEIA results with the LC/MS/MS results. The studies documented the source of hair (head or body) and other demographics to include gender and hair color. The comparison of the candidate device using the methamphetamine reagent at the 5 ng/10 mg hair calibrator with LC/MS/MS is shown in the following table.
| HEIA Result | LC/MS/MS Result, ng Methamphetamine/10 mg hair (% of cutoff calibrator) | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | < 2.5 (< 50% below cutoff) | 2.5 – 4.99 (≥ 50% below cutoff to cutoff) | 5.0 – 7.5 (cutoff to ≥ 50% above cutoff) | > 7.5 (> 50% above cutoff) |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 8 | 37 |
| Negative | 45 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
## Amphetamine, 3 ng Amphetamine/10 mg hair calibrator
Samples positive or negative for amphetamine were tested with the candidate assay using the amphetamine reagents.
The hair samples were then tested using Psychemedics' LC/MS/MS confirmatory assay, to compare the Psychemedics HEIA results with the LC/MS/MS results. The studies documented the source of hair (head or body) and other demographics to include gender and hair color. The comparison of the candidate device using the amphetamine reagent with LC/MS/MS is shown in the following table.
K210212 - Page 15 of 16
{15}
| HEIA Result | LC/MS/MS Result, ng Amphetamine/10 mg hair (% of cutoff calibrator) | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | < 1.5 (< 50% below cutoff) | 1.5 – 2.99 (≥ 50% below cutoff to cutoff) | 3.0 – 4.5 (cutoff to ≥ 50% above cutoff) | > 4.5 (> 50% above cutoff) |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 6 | 42 |
| Negative | 42 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Recovery from LC-MS/MS Analysis
The sponsor conducted a study to evaluate recovery for methamphetamine and amphetamine at concentrations above and below the cutoff (ng/10 mg hair). Eight sample tubes were prepared and analyzed by LC/MS/MS. Recovery of methamphetamine and amphetamine was approximately 100%.
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable.
C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable.
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Not applicable.
D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
E Expected Values/Reference Range:
Not applicable.
VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K210212 - Page 16 of 16
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.