The RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter can be used in the evaluation of a variety of cardiac arrhythmias from endocardial and intravascular sites.
Device Story
The RithmID-SD is a steerable diagnostic electrophysiology catheter used by clinicians to map cardiac electrical activity. It consists of a handle, a high-torque shaft, and a steerable distal tip equipped with platinum-iridium electrodes. The device is inserted through a sheath into the femoral vein and navigated to the heart or coronary sinus. It records electrical signals from endocardial and intravascular sites, which are then displayed for the clinician to evaluate cardiac arrhythmias. The catheter is biocompatible, radiopaque, and available in various curve shapes. It is a single-use, sterile device.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Evidence consists of bench testing and animal testing. Bench testing included corrosion resistance, signal acquisition, usability, electrical safety, mechanical fatigue (tip, shaft, flexural), torque strength, and packaging integrity (ASTM D4169-16, F1886/F1886M-16, F2096-11, F88/F88M-15). Biocompatibility testing followed ISO 10993 standards, including cytotoxicity, sensitization, intracutaneous reactivity, systemic toxicity, pyrogenicity, and hemocompatibility (thrombogenicity, hemolysis, complement activation).
Technological Characteristics
Catheter shaft made of PEBAX (7033, 5533, 6333, or 4033). Electrodes are platinum-iridium alloy. Adhesive: Loctite 4311. Features steerable tip, 6F diameter, and 4-10 electrodes. Sterilization via 100% Ethylene Oxide (EO) gas to SAL 10^-6. Complies with ISO 10993-7 for EO/ECH residuals. No software or electronic algorithm components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the evaluation of cardiac arrhythmias from endocardial and intravascular sites in patients requiring electrophysiological mapping.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An electrode recording catheter or an electrode recording probe is a device used to detect an intracardiac electrocardiogram, or to detect cardiac output or left-to-right heart shunts. The device may be unipolar or multipolar for electrocardiogram detection, or may be a platinum-tipped catheter which senses the presence of a special indicator for cardiac output or left-to-right heart shunt determinations.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is in blue and includes the letters "FDA" followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" stacked on top of each other.
February 14, 2022
Synaptic Medical Corporation Charles Yang Vice President of Quality and Regulatory Affairs 1817 Aston Ave, Suite 101 Carlsbad, California 92008
Re: K203793
Trade/Device Name: RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1220 Regulation Name: Electrode Recording Catheter Or Electrode Recording Probe Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DRF Dated: December 21, 2020 Received: December 28, 2020
Dear Charles Yang:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Aneesh Deoras Assistant Director Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Diagnostics and Monitoring Devices Office of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K203793
#### Device Name
RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter
Indications for Use (Describe)
The RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter can be used in the evaluation of a variety of cardiac arrhythmias from endocardial and intravascular sites.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
× Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter 510(k) Summary
This 510(k) Summary for the RithmID-SD Electrophysiology Catheter is submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.87(h) and 807.92 and following the recommendation outlined in FDA Guidance, The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notification [510(k)], dated 28 July, 2014.
## SUBMITTER [807.92(a)(1)]
Synaptic Medical Corporation 1817 Aston Ave Suite 101 Carlsbad CA 92008
| Contact Person: | Charles Yang |
|-----------------|------------------------------|
| Telephone: | 760-608-8388 |
| E-mail: | Charles.yang@synapticmed.com |
| Date prepared: | January 2, 2022 |
#### DEVICE [807.92(a)(2)]
| Trade/Device Name: | RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common/Generic Name: | Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter |
| Regulation Name: | Electrode Recording Catheter |
| Product Code: | DRF |
| Regulatory Class: | Class II |
| Submission Type: | Traditional 510(k) |
| Regulation Number: | 21 C.F.R. 870.1220 |
| Reviewing Product Branch: | Division of Cardiovascular Devices<br>Office of Device Evaluation, CDRH |
## PREDICATE DEVICE [807.92(a)(3)]
Map-ItTM Diagnostic Mapping Catheters (K160390)
#### REFERENCE DEVICE
InquiryTM Steerable Diagnostic Catheter (K961924)
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### DEVICE DESCRIPTION [807.92(a)(4)]
The RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter are intended to be used in the evaluation of a variety of cardiac arrhythmias from endocardial and intravascular sites. The RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter are biocompatible, flexible, radiopaque electrophysiology catheters that are available in a variety of diameters, lengths, curve shapes, and electrode number and spacing configurations, with a high-torque shaft with an array of platinum iridium alloy electrodes at the distal tip that can be used for recording electrical signals. The catheter is designed to facilitate the electrophysiological mapping of the heart.
The RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter consist of a handle, a shaft and a steerable diagnostic tip. The catheter is introduced through the sheath and into the femoral vein, from the inferior vena cava into the heart and coronary sinus. The RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter are available in 6F in various curves, including B, D, Y, and R curves.
## INDICATIONS FOR USE [807.92(a)(5)]
The RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter can be used in the evaluation of a variety of cardiac arrhythmias from endocardial and intravascular sites.
## COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS [807.92(a)(6)]
The technological characteristics of the RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter is highly analogous to the technological characteristics of the Map-It™ Diagnostic Mapping Catheters (Predicate Device, K160390) and Inquiry™ Steerable Diagnostic Catheter (Reference Device, K961924). Substantial equivalence is determined based on the following similarities:
- . Same intended use/indications for use
- Same principle of operation ●
- Same fundamental scientific technology .
- Incorporate similar catheter construction material ●
- Incorporate similar basic catheter design .
Table 1 comprises the comparison among RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter (Subject Device), Map-It™ Diagnostic Mapping Catheters (Predicate Device, K160390), and Inquiry™ Steerable Diagnostic Catheter (Reference Device, K961924)
{5}------------------------------------------------
# Table 1: Predicate Device, Reference Device vs. Subject Device Comparison
| Feature | [Predicate Device]<br>Map-It™ Diagnostic Mapping<br>Catheters<br>K160390 | [Reference Device]<br>Inquiry™ Steerable Diagnostic<br>Catheter<br>K961924 | [Subject Device]<br>RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic<br>Electrophysiology Catheter |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Product Code | DRF | DRF | Same as Predicate Device and Reference<br>Device |
| Regulatory Class | II | II | Same as Predicate Device and Reference<br>Device |
| Regulation<br>Number | 21 CFR 870.1220 | 21 CFR 870.1220 | Same as Predicate Device and Reference<br>Device |
| Regulation Name | Electrode Recording Catheter | Electrode Recording Catheter | Same as Predicate Device and Reference<br>Device |
| Generic Name | Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter | Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter | Same as Predicate Device and Reference<br>Device |
| Indications for Use<br>Statement | The APT Map-It™ diagnostic Mapping<br>Catheters can be used in the evaluation<br>of a variety of cardiac arrhythmias<br>from endocardial and intravascular<br>sites. | The Inquiry fixed curve and steerable<br>electrophysiology catheters are used for<br>electrogram recording and cardiac<br>stimulation during diagnostic<br>electrophysiology studies. The catheters<br>are commonly placed at the high right<br>atrium, right ventricular apex, and HIS<br>bundle. | The RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic<br>Electrophysiology Catheter can be used in<br>the evaluation of a variety of cardiac<br>arrhythmias from endocardial and<br>intravascular sites. |
| Intended Use | Intended to facilitate the<br>electrophysiological mapping of the<br>heart. | Intended to facilitate the<br>electrophysiological mapping of the<br>heart. | Same as Predicate Device and Reference<br>Device |
| Feature | [Predicate Device]<br>Map-It™ Diagnostic Mapping<br>Catheters<br>K160390 | [Reference Device]<br>Inquiry™ Steerable Diagnostic<br>Catheter<br>K961924 | [Subject Device]<br>RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic<br>Electrophysiology Catheter |
| Component | Handle Shaft Steerable diagnostic tip | Not Listed | Handle Shaft Steerable diagnostic tip |
| Effective Length | 1100 mm | Not Listed | 1050 mm |
| Number of<br>Electrodes | 4/5/10/20 | Not Listed | 4/6/10 |
| French Size | 4F/5F/6F/7F | Between 5F and 8F | 6F |
| Outer Diameter | 4F, 5F, 6F, 7F<br>Fixed Catheters: 4/3.3F, 4F, 5F, and<br>6F sizes with a 0.026" guidewire tip<br>configuration | Not Listed | 6F |
| Tip Form | Electrode tip on all models except the<br>guidewire tip and PV loop<br>configuration | Not Listed | Electrode Tip |
| Ring Electrode<br>Width | 0.6mm/1mm/2mm | Not Listed | 1.25 mm |
| Feature | [Predicate Device]<br>Map-It™ Diagnostic Mapping<br>Catheters<br>K160390 | [Reference Device]<br>Inquiry™ Steerable Diagnostic<br>Catheter<br>K961924 | [Subject Device]<br>RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic<br>Electrophysiology Catheter |
| Configuration | Cable connector and handle Pt-Ir Electrodes (4-20), various widths Shaft 4F to 7F Thermoplastic elastomer Strain reinforcement shrink tubing Various Curves | Not Listed | Cable connector and handle Pt-Ir Electrodes (4 to 10) Shaft 6F Thermoplastic elastomer Strain reinforcement shrink tubing Various Curves |
| Material | PEBAX catheter shaft,<br>Platinum-iridium electrodes and<br>electrical connectors | Not Listed | Shaft (main tube): PEBAX 7033 Tip Tubing: PEBAX 5533, PEBAX<br>6333, or PEBAX 4033 Electrodes (Ring & Tip): Pt/Ir alloy Adhesive: Loctite 4311 |
| Sterilization | Ethylene Oxide | Ethylene Oxide | Same as Predicate Device and Reference<br>Device |
| Method of Supply | Sterile and Single Use | Sterile and Single Use | Same as Predicate Device and Reference<br>Device |
{6}------------------------------------------------
{7}------------------------------------------------
{8}------------------------------------------------
## PERFORMANCE DATA [807.92(b)]
Performance Bench Testing and Animal Testing: Results of the performance bench testing (Table 2) indicate that RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter meets established performance requirements and is substantially equivalent for its intended use.
| Performance Bench Testing | |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Tests | Results |
| Corrosion<br>Resistance | All test samples met the acceptance criteria. |
| Particulate<br>Matter<br>Evaluation | All test samples met the acceptance criteria<br>and is equivalent to the Reference Device. |
| Radiopacity<br>Detectability | All test samples met the acceptance criteria. |
| Signal<br>Acquisition | All test samples met the acceptance criteria. |
| Usability | All test samples met the acceptance criteria.<br>The performance of the Subject Device is<br>better or equivalent to the Reference Device. |
| Electrical Safety | All test samples met the acceptance criteria. |
| Visual Inspection | All test samples met the acceptance criteria. |
| Dimensional<br>Verification | All test samples met the acceptance criteria. |
| Simulated Use | All test samples met the acceptance criteria. |
| Connection Plug<br>Force | All test samples met the acceptance criteria. |
| Tip Fatigue<br>Tolerance | All test samples met the acceptance criteria. |
| Shaft Fatigue<br>Tolerance | All test samples met the acceptance criteria. |
| Flexural Fatigue<br>Tolerance | All test samples met the acceptance criteria. |
| Torsional Force | All test samples met the acceptance criteria. |
| Electrode<br>Conductor<br>Resistance | All test samples met the acceptance criteria. |
| Buckling Force | All test samples met the acceptance criteria.<br>The buckling force of the Subject Device is<br>less than or equal to the Reference Device. |
| Peak Tensile<br>Force | All test samples met the acceptance criteria.<br>The peak tensile force of the Subject Device<br>was compared to the Reference Device. |
| Torque Strength | The average number of 360° rotations when<br>permanent mechanical deformation occurs<br>was recorded for the Subject Device and<br>Reference Device.<br>The torque strength of the Subject device is<br>compared to the Reference Device for<br>reference only. |
| Packaging Integrity | |
| Distribution<br>Simulation | All test samples met the acceptance criteria<br>per ASTM D4169-16. |
| Visual Inspection | All test samples met the acceptance criteria<br>per ASTM F1886/F1886M-16 |
| Bubble Leak Test | All test samples met the acceptance criteria<br>per ASTM F2096-11. |
| Tray Seal<br>Strength | All test samples met the acceptance criteria<br>per F88/F88M-15. |
#### Table 2: Performance Bench Testing Summary
{9}------------------------------------------------
{10}------------------------------------------------
Biocompatibility: Results of the biocompatibility testing (Table 3) indicate that RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter is biocompatible and is substantially equivalent for its intended use.
| Test | Conclusion |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
| Cytotoxicity – MEM Elution<br>Assay<br><br>ISO 10993-5 | Non-cytotoxic |
| Sensitization - ISO Guinea Pig<br>Maximization (2 Extracts)<br><br>ISO 10993-10 | Non-sensitizer |
| Intracutaneous Reactivity – ISO<br>Intracutaneous Study in Rabbits<br>(2 Extracts)<br><br>ISO 10993-10 | Non-irritant |
| Acute Systemic Toxicity – ISO<br>Acute Systemic Toxicity Study in<br>Mice (2 Extracts)<br><br>ISO 10993-11 | Non-Toxic |
| Systemic Toxicity – ISO Materials<br>Mediated Pyrogenicity in Rabbits<br><br>ISO 10993-11 | Non-Pyrogenic |
| Hemocompatibility – Hemolysis<br>Assay (Direct and Indirect)<br><br>ISO 10993-4 | Non-Hemolytic |
| Hemocompatibility – ISO<br>Thrombogenicity in Canine<br>(GLP) | Passed |
| ISO 10993-4 | |
| Hemocompatibility –<br>Complement Activation SC5b-9<br>Assay<br>ISO 10993-4 | Non-Activator |
| Hemocompatibility – ISO Partial<br>Thromboplastin Time (PTT)<br>Assay<br>ISO 10993-4 | Passed |
## Table 3: Biocompatibility Test Summary
{11}------------------------------------------------
Shelf life: The accelerated shelf-life testing for RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter has been conducted (t=1 year accelerated aging) with test results confirmed that all acceptance criteria were met. No new questions of safety or effectiveness were raised. Based on the results, we can conclude that RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter will perform as intended to the Design Specification. RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter is labeled for 1-year shelf life.
Packaging: The packaging validation, t=1 year accelerated aging was performed on the RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter. The results from packaging testing conducted on RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter showed that the acceptance criteria were met. Therefore, we can conclude the RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter packaging will provide the adequate and effective protection and sterile barrier requirements.
Sterilization: RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter is sterilized using 100% Ethylene Oxide (EO) gas in the same manner as FDA cleared Predicate Device, Map-It™ Diagnostic Mapping Catheters (K160390) and Reference Device, Inquiry™ Steerable Diagnostic Catheter (K961924). RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter is sold sterile, for single use, and single patient only. The sterilization results showed that the stylization dose and routine sterilization process was validated to achieve a SAL of 106 for the RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter.
{12}------------------------------------------------
| Test Description | Results |
|---------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Original Sterilization<br>Validation and Adoption | The validation study demonstrated that the sterilization<br>process and equipment are capable of reliably and<br>consistently sterilizing the device to a minimum SAL of 10-6. |
| | The sterilization adoption study demonstrated the<br>appropriateness of the ethylene oxide sterilization process for<br>the subject device family. The subject device family was<br>adopted to the original validated sterilization cycle<br>parameters and chambers. |
| EO and ECH Residuals | The residual traces of EO and ECH for the subject device are<br>below the limits specified in ISO 10993-7. |
| Bacterial Endotoxin Levels | <20.0 EU/Device |
## CONCLUSIONS
RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter met all specified criteria. We conclude that the Subject Device, RithmID-SD Steerable Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter, is substantially equivalent in its intended use, design, material, performance, and the underlying fundamental scientific technology used, to the Predicate Device, Map-It™ Diagnostic Mapping Catheters (K160390) and the Reference Device, Inquiry™ Steerable Diagnostic Catheter (K961924).
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.