The OMNIVision™ system is intended to be used as an intra-operative system to assist in the alignment of prosthetic components during Total Hip Arthroplasty, where a reference to a rigid anatomical structure can be identified. The system achieves this by displaying intra-operative measurements of the acetabular component to the user calculated from visual information from a camera detecting fiducial markers. The OMNIVision™ system is compatible for use with the legally marketed products - OPSInsight™ and - the Corin TrinityTM Acetabular System, - Trinity-iTM Acetabular shells and - TrinityTM non-occluded titanium plasma sprayed (TPS) acetabular shells. The OMNI Vision™ system is indicated for use with the posterior, anterior surgical approaches for primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Device Story
OMNIVision system is an image-based intra-operative navigation system for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). It assists surgeons in acetabular cup alignment and depth placement. Input data includes pre-operative patient CT scans and real-time visual information from a camera tracking fiducial markers attached to the patient's pelvis. The system performs image-based registration, matching pre-operative CT anatomy to intra-operative patient position. It calculates cup alignment relative to the patient's anatomy, independent of pelvic position on the surgical table. Output is displayed as real-time augmented/virtual reality views on a laptop workstation. Used by surgeons in the OR to guide implant positioning, potentially improving accuracy and patient outcomes. System components include a camera assembly, laptop, fiducial markers, and sterile drapes.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical trials were conducted. Evidence consists of bench testing and cadaveric studies. Cadaveric evaluation demonstrated accuracy of ±3° angular and ±3mm linear. Software bench testing using a phantom (ASTM-F2554 guidance) showed mean accuracy of ±1° angular and ±1mm linear. Additional validation included usability, sterilization, and electrical safety (IEC 60601-1, EN 60601-1-2).
Technological Characteristics
System includes camera assembly, laptop workstation, fiducial markers, and bone fixation hardware. Uses image-based registration combining pre-operative CT scans with intra-operative optical tracking. Connectivity is via laptop workstation. Sterilization: EtO for fiducial markers/drapes; vacuum steam autoclave for reusable instruments. Compliance: IEC 60601-1, EN 60601-1-2, ISO 11135:2014. Software-based navigation.
Indications for Use
Indicated for primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) patients undergoing posterior, anterolateral, or direct anterior surgical approaches, where a rigid anatomical structure is available for reference.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.
Stryker Navigation System - CT Based Hip Module (K050615)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is in blue and includes the letters "FDA" followed by the words "U.S. Food & Drug Administration".
April 12, 2021
Corin USA % Robert Poggie President BioVera, Inc. 65 Promenade Saint Louis Notre Dame de Llle Perrot, Quebec J7V 7P2 Canada
Re: K203751
Trade/Device Name: OMNIVision system Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4560 Regulation Name: Stereotaxic Instrument Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OLO Dated: January 13, 2021 Received: January 19, 2021
Dear Robert Poggie:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Shumaya Ali -S
Shumaya Ali, M.P.H. Assistant Director DHT6C: Division of Restorative. Repair and Trauma Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
# Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 06/30/2023 See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known)
K203751
Device Name
OMNIVision™ system
Indications for Use (Describe)
The OMNIVision™ system is intended to be used as an intra-operative system to assist in the alignment of prosthetic components during Total Hip Arthroplasty, where a reference to a rigid anatomical structure can be identified. The system achieves this by displaying intra-operative measurements of the acetabular component to the user calculated from visual information from a camera detecting fiducial markers.
The OMNIVision™ system is compatible for use with the legally marketed products
- · OPSInsight™ and
- · the Corin TrinityTM Acetabular System,
- · Trinity-iTM Acetabular shells and
· TrinityTM non-occluded titanium plasma sprayed (TPS) acetabular shells.
The OMNI Vision™ system is indicated for use with the posterior, anterior surgical approaches for primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
### 510(k) SUMMARY
## The OMNIVision™ System
In accordance with 21 CFR 807.92 of the Federal Code of Regulations, the following information is a summary of safety and effectiveness of the OMNIVision™ System.
#### A. SUBMITTERS INFORMATION
| Submitter Name: | BioVera, Inc. |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Submitter Address: | 65 Promenade Saint-Louis, Notre-Dame-De-L'Ile-Perrot,<br>Quebec, J7V 7P2, CANADA |
| Contact Person: | Robert A Poggie, PhD |
| Phone and Fax Numbers: | (514) 901-0796 |
| Date of Submission: | December 22, 2020 |
#### B. DEVICE IDENTIFICATION & MANUFACTURER
| Manufacturer Name: | Optimized Ortho Pty Ltd |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| Manufacturer Address: | 17 Bridge Street, Pymble, NSW, 2073, AUSTRALIA |
| Registration Number: | 3012916784 |
| Contact Name: | Crissy Tomarelli |
| Title: | Regulatory and Quality Director |
| Device Trade Name: | OMNIVision™ System |
| Device Common Name: | Stereotaxic instrument |
| Classification Name: | Stereotaxic instrument |
| Classification Code: | OLO - Class II |
| Classification Panel: | Orthopedic |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 882.4560 |
# C1. PRIMARY PREDICATE DEVICE K172849
Intellijoint Surgical Inc., Intellijoint HIP® Generation 2C System
## C1. PREDICATE DEVICE K050615
Stryker Navigation System - CT Based Hip Module
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### D. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The OMNIV/ision™ system is an image-based navigation system intended to assist the surgeon in delivering a target acetabular cup placement during Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). The system consists of a Camera Assembly, OMNIVision™ software application installed onto the laptop, fiducial markers used to track the position of the surgical instruments, and a single use sterile drape. The fiducial markers and camera drape are supplied in packaged and EtO sterilized condition.
The OMNIVision™ system displays real-time intraoperative information, cup alignment and cup depth, with augmented and virtual reality views using a fixed reference attached to the patient's pelvis. The workflow of the OMNIVision™ system involves instrument calibration, registration of patient anatomy, and determination of cup alignment. The system uses image-based registration of the patient's anatomy and matches it to the pre-operative CT images of the patient's anatomy, the OMNIVision System to intra operatively calculate and display the information relative to the patient's anatomy, and independent of the patient's intra-operative pelvic position.
The OMNIVision™ System is designed for use with the Corin Trinity Acetabular System components and compatible with the Corin OPSInsight™ system for pre-operative planning.
#### E. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The OMNIV/ision™ system is intended to be used as an intra-operative system to assist in the alignment of prosthetic components during Total Hip Arthroplasty, where a rigid anatomical structure can be identified.
The system achieves this by displaying intra-operative measurements of the acetabular component to the user calculated from visual information from a camera detecting fiducial markers.
The OMNIVision™ system is compatible for use with the legally marketed products
- · OPSInsight™ and
- · the Corin Trinity™ Acetabular System,
- · Trinity-i™ Acetabular shells and
- · Trinity™ non-occluded titanium plasma sprayed (TPS) acetabular shells.
The OMNIV/ision™ system is indicated for use with the posterior, anterolateral and direct anterior surgical approaches for primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
### F. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The subject OMNIVision system uses both intra operative registration and pre-operative CT images of the patient's pelvic anatomy for the frames of reference for the purpose of guiding acetabular cup placement in THA surgery, and matches the pre-op and intra-op positions intra-operatively. The OMNIVision system determines position of the acetabular cup that is independent's intra-operative pelvic position. The predicate Stryker Navigation System CT Based Hip Module utilizes CT scans obtained preoperatively as a frame of reference for positioning an acetabular component. The primary predicate Intellijoint system uses intra-operative registration for the frame of reference of the pelvis, but does not utilize preoperative patient images. The table below compares technical characteristics of the subject device OMNIVision™ System and the primary predicate device, the Intellijoint HIP Generation 2C System.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Characteristic | Subject Device, OMNIVision System | Intellijoint HIP Gen 2C System, K172849 |
|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Anatomical use? | Hip | Hip |
| Function / Use | The system uses registration and ensures<br>matching with pre-op patient information (CT)<br>intra-operatively, allowing the system to calculate<br>and display information relative to the rigid body<br>reference (Pelvic Pin and Fiducial Marker), making<br>it independent of the patient's intra-operative<br>pelvic position (relative to the surgical table). The<br>system is used as an adjunct to aid the surgeon in<br>positioning the acetabular component in THA. | The system uses registration and aids the<br>surgeon in performing intra-operative<br>measurements including measurements of limb<br>position, joint center-of-rotation, and implant<br>component positioning. The system is used as<br>an adjunct to aid the surgeon in positioning the<br>acetabular component in THA. |
| Proprietary software? | Yes | Yes |
| Portable System? | Yes | Yes |
| Hardware | The system includes a Camera assembly, single<br>use sterile drape for camera, fiducial markers ('or<br>trackers') and reusable tools for tracking, laptop<br>computer workstation, software, and bone fixation<br>instruments/hardware. | The system includes an infrared camera,<br>trackers for registration intra op, computer<br>workstation, software, and bone fixation<br>instruments / hardware. |
| Use of pre-op info? | Yes, CT scans of patient's pelvis | No |
| Intra-op registration? | Yes | Yes |
| Trackers sterile? | Yes | Yes |
#### G. PERFORMANCE DATA
The following tests and studies were performed to validate and verify the subject OMNIVision™ System:
- Surgeon-user verification studies of performance measures and accuracy performed by cadaver . surgeries. The results of the cadaver evaluation demonstrated that the subject device met the established criteria for user requirements. The accuracy of the OMNIVision™ System in implanting an acetabular cup was ±3° for anqular position and ±3mm for linear position.
- Software bench testing with a phantom device developed with guidance from ASTM-F2554 . demonstrated mean positional accuracy of ±1° for angular position and ±1mm for linear position.
- Validation testing of precision, accuracy, and usability of the fiducial markers after cleaning, packing, . and sterilization and in simulated use surgeries.
- . Documentation and validation of OMNIVision software were performed per the FDA Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices.
- Electrical and emissions safety testing demonstrated compliance to EN 60601-1-2:2015, IEC 60601-. 1:2005 (3rd Ed.), IEC 60601-1-6:2010, EN60601-1:2006/A1:2013, ANSI/AAMI ES60601-1:2005.
- Sterility of the fiducial markers was validated per ISO 11135:2014. .
- The reusable instrument kit was validated for manual and automated cleaning methods and sterilization . by vacuum steam autoclave.
#### H. CONCLUSION
The OMNIVision™ System used with Corin Trinity acetabular cups was determined to be substantially equivalent to the Intellijoint and Stryker predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.