K203149 · Medacta International S.A. · NKG · Nov 16, 2020 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K203149
Device Name
M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System
Applicant
Medacta International S.A.
Product Code
NKG · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Nov 16, 2020
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3075
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The M.U.S.T. Mini posterior cervical screw system is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion, in skeletally mature patient, for the following acute and chronic instabilities of the cervical spine (C1 to C7) and the thoracic spine from T1-T3: traumatic spinal fractures and/or traumatic dislocations; instability or deformity; failed previous fusions (e.g., pseudarthrosis); tumors involving the cervical spine; degenerative disease, including intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, neck and/or arm pain of discogenic origin as confirmed by radiographic studies, and degenerative disease of the facets with instability. The M.U.S.T. Mini posterior cervical screw system is also intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion. In order to achieve additional levels of fixation, the M.U.S.T. Mini posterior cervical screw system may be connected to the M.U.S.T. system rods with the M.U.S.T. Mini rod connectors. Transition rods with differing diameters may also be used to connect the M.U.S.T. Mini posterior cervical screw system to the M.U.S.T. system. Refer to the M.U.S.T. system package insert for a list of the M.U.S.T. indications of use. When used with the Occipital Plate the M.U.S.T Mini posterior cervical screw system is also intended to provide immobilization and stabilization for the occipito-cervico-thoracic junction (occiput – T3) in treatment of the instabilities mentioned above, including occipitocervical dislocation.
Device Story
M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System is a spinal fixation implant set; includes anodized rods (straight/pre-curved) and rod-to-rod connectors (parallel/in-line). Used by surgeons in clinical settings to immobilize/stabilize spinal segments (C1-T3). Rods connect to screws/plates to restore spinal integrity or facilitate fusion. Pre-curved rods reduce intraoperative contouring; connectors allow linking rods of varying diameters (3.5mm/5.5mm) to accommodate patient anatomy. Output is a rigid construct providing mechanical support to the spine; aids in treating fractures, tumors, and degenerative conditions. Benefits include stabilization of unstable segments and potential pain relief.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data provided. Substantial equivalence established via engineering rationale and comparative analysis of design, materials, and mechanical performance against predicate devices.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Ti-6Al-4V ELI (ISO 5832-3, ASTM F136). Surface: Type III color anodization. Components: Anodized rods (straight/pre-curved), rod-to-rod connectors (parallel/in-line). Dimensions: Rod diameters 3.5mm and 5.5mm; lengths 30-420mm. Connectivity: Mechanical fixation via rod-screw/rod-connector interfaces. Sterilization: Not specified (implied standard medical device sterilization).
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients requiring spinal immobilization/stabilization as an adjunct to fusion or for temporary stabilization in advanced stage tumors. Covers cervical (C1-C7) and thoracic (T1-T3) spine. Conditions: traumatic fractures/dislocations, instability/deformity, pseudarthrosis, tumors, degenerative disease (radiculopathy, myelopathy, discogenic pain, facet instability), and occipitocervical dislocation.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Posterior cervical screw systems are comprised of multiple, interconnecting components, made from a variety of materials that allow an implant system to be built from the occiput to the upper thoracic spine to fit the patient's anatomical and physiological requirements, as determined by preoperative cross-sectional imaging. Such a spinal assembly consists of a combination of bone anchors via screws (i.e., occipital screws, cervical lateral mass screws, cervical pedicle screws, C2 pars screws, C2 translaminar screws, C2 transarticular screws), longitudinal members (e.g., plates, rods, including dual diameter rods, plate/rod combinations), transverse or cross connectors, interconnection mechanisms (e.g., rod-to-rod connectors, offset connectors), and closure mechanisms (e.g., set screws, nuts). Posterior cervical screw systems are rigidly fixed devices that do not contain dynamic features, including but not limited to: non-uniform longitudinal elements or features that allow more motion or flexibility compared to rigid systems.Posterior cervical screw systems are intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in patients as an adjunct to fusion for acute and chronic instabilities of the cervical spine and/or craniocervical junction and/or cervicothoracic junction such as: (1) Traumatic spinal fractures and/or traumatic dislocations; (2) deformities; (3) instabilities; (4) failed previous fusions (e.g., pseudarthrosis); (5) tumors; (6) inflammatory disorders; (7) spinal degeneration, including neck and/or arm pain of discogenic origin as confirmed by imaging studies (radiographs, CT, MRI); (8) degeneration of the facets with instability; and (9) reconstruction following decompression to treat radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. These systems are also intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for posterior cervical screw systems are:(1) The design characteristics of the device, including engineering schematics, must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use.
(2) Nonclinical performance testing must demonstrate the mechanical function and durability of the implant.
(3) Device components must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Validation testing must demonstrate the cleanliness and sterility of, or the ability to clean and sterilize, the device components and device-specific instruments.
(5) Labeling must include the following:
(i) A clear description of the technological features of the device including identification of device materials and the principles of device operation;
(ii) Intended use and indications for use including levels of fixation;
(iii) Device specific warnings, precautions, and contraindications that include the following statements:
(A) “Precaution: Preoperative planning prior to implantation of posterior cervical screw systems should include review of cross-sectional imaging studies (
*e.g.,* CT and/or MRI) to evaluate the patient's cervical anatomy including the transverse foramen, neurologic structures, and the course of the vertebral arteries. If any findings would compromise the placement of these screws, other surgical methods should be considered. In addition, use of intraoperative imaging should be considered to guide and/or verify device placement, as necessary.”(B) “Precaution: Use of posterior cervical pedicle screw fixation at the C3 through C6 spinal levels requires careful consideration and planning beyond that required for lateral mass screws placed at these spinal levels, given the proximity of the vertebral arteries and neurologic structures in relation to the cervical pedicles at these levels.”
(iv) Identification of magnetic resonance (MR) compatibility status;
(v) Cleaning and sterilization instructions for devices and instruments that are provided non-sterile to the end user, and;
(vi) Detailed instructions of each surgical step, including device removal.
Predicate Devices
M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System (K171369)
M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System Extension (K182837)
M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System Extension (K190631)
M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System Extension (K200130)
Synapse Occipital-Cervical-Thoracic (OCT) System (K142838)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: on the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo, which features an abstract image of a person embracing another person. To the right of this is the FDA logo, which includes the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
November 16, 2020
Medacta International SA % Mr. Chris Lussier Senior Director, Quality and Regulatory Medacta USA 3973 Delp Street Memphis, Tennessee 38118
Re: K203149
Trade/Device Name: M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3075 Regulation Name: Posterior Cervical Screw System Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NKG. KWP Dated: October 21, 2020 Received: October 22, 2020
Dear Mr. Lussier:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Colin O'Neill, M.B.E. Assistant Director DHT6B: Division of Spinal Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
### K203149
Device Name
M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System
## Indications for Use (Describe)
The M.U.S.T. Mini posterior cervical screw system is intended to provide immobilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion, in skeletally mature patient, for the following acute and chronic instabilities of the cervical spine (C1 to C7) and the thoracic spine from T1-T3: traumatic spinal fractures and/or traumatic dislocations; instability or deformity; failed previous (e.g., pseudarthrosis); tumors involving the cervical spine; degenerative disease, including intractable radior myelopathy, neck and/or arm pain of discogenic origin as confirmed by radiographic studies, and degenerative disease of the facets with instability.
The M.U.S.T. Mini posterior cervical screw system is also intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.
In order to achieve additional levels of fixation, the M.U.S.T. Mini posterior cervical screw system may be connected to the M.U.S.T. system rods with the M.U.S.T. Mini rod connectors. Transition rods with differing diameters may also be used to connect the M.U.S.T. Mini posterior cervical screw system to the M.U.S.T. system. Refer to the M.U.S.T. system package insert for a list of the M.U.S.T. indications of use.
When used with the Occipital Plate the M.U.S.T Mini posterior cervical screw system is also intended to provide immobilization and stabilization for the occipito-cervico-thoracic junction(occiput - T3) in treatment of the instabilities mentioned above, including occipitocervical dislocation.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <span style="font-family: sans-serif;">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span style="font-family: sans-serif;">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
#### I. Submitter
Medacta International SA Strada Regina 6874 Castel San Pietro (CH) Switzerland Phone (+41) 91 696 60 60 Fax (+41) 91 696 60 66
Contact Person: Stefano Baj, Regulatory Affairs and Compliance Director, Medacta International SA Applicant Correspondent: Christopher Lussier, Senior Director, Quality and Regulatory, Medacta USA Date Prepared: October 21, 2020 Date Revised: November 4, 2020
#### II. Device
| Device Proprietary Name: | M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| Common or Usual Name: | Spinal Interlaminal Fixation Orthosis |
| Classification Name: | Posterior Cervical Screw System |
| Primary Product Code: | NKG, KWP |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 888.3075, 21 CFR 888.3050 |
| Device Classification | II |
#### III. Predicate Device
Substantial equivalence is claimed to the following devices:
Primary predicate device:
- · M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System, K171369, Medacta International SA
Additional predicate devices:
- . M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System Extension, K182837, Medacta International SA
- M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System Extension, K190631, Medacta ● International SA
- M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System Extension, K200130, Medacta ● International SA
- Synapse Occipital-Cervical-Thoracic (OCT) System, K142838, Synthes USA Products, ● LLC (also referred to as Synthes' Synapse System)
- Synapse System, K070573, Synthes Spine Co. LP, (also referred to as Synthes' Synapse ● System)
- . Synthes Cervifix/Axon, K023675, Synthes (USA), (also referred to as Synthes' Axon System)
{4}------------------------------------------------
- Synthes Cervifix System, K991089, Synthes Spine, (also referred to as Synthes' Axon System)
- Depuy Mountaneer OCT spinal system, K042508, DEPUY SPINE (USA), INC. ●
Reference Predicate:
- MUST Pedicle Screw System, K1121115, Medacta International SA
- MUST Pedicle Screw System, K141988, Medacta International SA ●
- MUST Pedicle Screw System, K162061, Medacta International SA ●
#### IV. Device Description
The M.U.S.T. MINI Anodized Rods and the Rod to Rod Connectors (parallel and in-line) are a line extension to the previously cleared Medacta M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System (K171369), M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System extension (K182837) and M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System extension (K200130).
Rod to rod connectors are extended to additional design: the parallel and the In-line design, available in both open/closed design. Connectors are designed to accommodate both the rods in 03.5mm and Ø5.5mm. This solution allows to connect the cervical and upper thoracic spine with axial or parallel rods from equal diameter or different: 3.5mm versus 3.5mm versus 5.5mm.
Anodized rods (straight and pre-curved) are provided in straight and pre-curved designs and the diameters and lengths are within the range of existing M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System rods product range, with equivalent overall characteristics: same intended use, diameter 3.5mm, in the range 30-420mm, material, machining, washing, packaging and final storing condition.
The subject devices are manufactured from Ti-6A1-4V ELI (ISO 5832-3 Implants for surgery --Metallic materials -- Part 3: Wrought titanium 6-aluminium 4-vanadium allov + ASTM F136 Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R56401), the same material of the previous cleared M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System (K171369) and M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System Extension (K182837 and K200130).
Surface finishing of both subjects devices is further characterized by color anodization like for existing Polyaxial screws, hooks, lateral connector, rod to rod connector, cross connector clamp and spinous reconstruction cross connectors (all cleared under K171369), Occipital Plates (K182837) and are Type III color anodized.
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### V. Indications for Use
The M.U.S.T. Mini posterior cervical screw system is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion, in skeletally mature patient, for the following acute and chronic instabilities of the cervical spine (C1 to C7) and the thoracic spine from T1-T3: traumatic spinal fractures and/or traumatic dislocations; instability or deformity; failed previous fusions (e.g., pseudarthrosis); tumors involving the cervical spine; degenerative disease, including intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, neck and/or arm pain of discogenic origin as confirmed by radiographic studies, and degenerative disease of the facets with instability.
The M.U.S.T. Mini posterior cervical screw system is also intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.
In order to achieve additional levels of fixation, the M.U.S.T. Mini posterior cervical screw system may be connected to the M.U.S.T. system rods with the M.U.S.T. Mini rod connectors. Transition rods with differing diameters may also be used to connect the M.U.S.T. Mini posterior cervical screw system to the M.U.S.T. system. Refer to the M.U.S.T. system package insert for a list of the M.U.S.T. indications of use.
When used with the Occipital Plate the M.U.S.T Mini posterior cervical screw system is also intended to provide immobilization and stabilization for the occipito-cervico-thoracic junction (occiput – T3) in treatment of the instabilities mentioned above, including occipitocervical dislocation.
#### VI. Comparison of Technological Characteristics
The M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws Rods subject of this submission and the predicate devices share the following characteristics:
- diameter;
- materials of construction;
- biocompatibility: ●
- device usage;
- sterility;
- shelf life; and ●
- packaging. ●
The rods are substantially equivalent to the primary predicate device M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System (K171369), Synapse Occipital-Cervical-Thoracic (OCT) System, (K142838 and K070573) and Synthes Cervifix/Axon System (K991089 and K023675)
In particular the Straight Anodized Rods subject of this submission have the same diameter of the predicates devices M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System (K171369), Synapse Occipital-Cervical-Thoracic (OCT) System, (K142838 and K070573) and Synthes Cervifix/Axon System (K991089 and K023675).
{6}------------------------------------------------
The length range included in the Predicates devices, except the longest sizes that don't introduce any worst case than the shorter one, have no impact on safety and performance of the overall construct. A long rod can be cut to adapt the length to patient anatomy.
Pre-curved anodized Rods subject of this submission have the same diameter as the predicate devices M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System (K171369), Synapse Occipital-Cervical-Thoracic (OCT) System, (K142838 and K070573) and Synthes Cervifix/Axon System (K991089 and K023675). The length range of Pre-curved anodized Rods is identical to the straight rods included in the predicates devices except the smaller and longest size. The pre-curved rod design reduces intraoperative steps and stress for contouring the rod. Shorter and longer sizes offer improved versatility in the system to accommodate individual patient's anatomy.
The M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System Rod to Rod connectors subject of this submission and the predicate devices share the following characteristics:
- smaller rod diameter interface Ø3.5mm
- materials of construction; ●
- biocompatibility; ●
- device usage;
- sterility; ●
- shelf life; and ●
- packaging. ●
The Extension M.U.S.T. MINI Posterior Cervical Screws System rod connectors are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices in terms of smaller rod diameter interface, materials, biocompatibility, device usage, sterility, shelf life and packaging.
In details, the parallel Rod to Rod Connectors have no difference with the predicates devices. The In-line connectors have no impact on the overall construct performance since the fixation interface at the connector-rod is equivalent to the parallel ones.
The new devices has been designed in order to increase the product range. This technological difference does not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness and a comparison evaluation shows there are no new risks associated with the subject device design.
#### VII. Performance Data
- . Engineering Rationale
A comparative analysis of the subject devices to the identified predicate and reference devices was performed to determine if this line-extension created a new worst-case product size. It was determined that the subject devices are substantially equivalent to the previously cleared predicate device and that the line-extension can be considered within the scope of the design verification and validation testing previously completed for the initial MUST MINI implants product range.
{7}------------------------------------------------
## VIII. Conclusion
The information provided within this submission supports that the subject devices are as safe and effective as the predicate devices.
Although minor differences exist between the subject and primary predicate device, testing supports that these differences do not raise any new questions of safety or effectiveness. Therefore, it is concluded that the subject devices are substantially equivalent to the identified predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.