Once finalized into a suitable design, the Amber Mill Q Series and Amber Mill Direct Series are indicated for use as inlays, onlays, veneer, partial crowns and crowns.
Device Story
Lithium disilicate ceramic blocks for dental prosthetic fabrication; processed via CAD/CAM milling systems. Subject devices supplied fully crystallized; no sintering required. Amber Mill Q Series features central hole for zirconia cap/abutment connection; Amber Mill Direct Series is solid. Used in dental clinics by dental professionals to create aesthetic restorations (veneers, inlays, onlays, crowns). Output is a custom-milled ceramic prosthesis bonded to natural teeth or dental implant abutments. Benefits include restoration of tooth form, function, and aesthetics.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance evaluated per ISO 6872 (flexural strength >300 MPa, chemical solubility <100 ug/cm2, thermal expansion, radioactivity, glass transition temperature). Biocompatibility confirmed via ISO 10993-5 (cytotoxicity), ISO 10993-10 (sensitization/irritation), and ISO 10993-11.
Technological Characteristics
Lithium disilicate ceramic (SiO2, Li2O, K2O, P2O5, Al2O3). Fully crystallized blocks. ISO 6872 Type II, Class 3. Flexural strength >300 MPa. Thermal expansion 11.5±0.5 x 10^-6/°C. Compatible with CAD/CAM milling systems. Biocompatible per ISO 10993-3, 5, 10, 11.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring dental restorations including inlays, onlays, veneers, partial crowns, and crowns.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Porcelain powder for clinical use is a device consisting of a mixture of kaolin, felspar, quartz, or other substances intended for use in the production of artificial teeth in fixed or removable dentures, of jacket crowns, facings, and veneers. The device is used in prosthetic dentistry by heating the powder mixture to a high temperature in an oven to produce a hard prosthesis with a glass-like finish.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
August 26, 2021
HASS Corp. % Priscilla Chung Regulatory Affairs Consultant Lk Consulting Group USA, Inc. 1150 Roosevelt STE 200 Irvine, California 92620
Re: K202952
Trade/Device Name: Amber Mill Q Series & Amber Mill Direct Series Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.6660 Regulation Name: Porcelain Powder For Clinical Use Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: EIH Dated: May 19, 2021 Received: May 28, 2021
Dear Priscilla Chung:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
For Michael E. Adjodha, M.ChE. Assistant Director DHT1B: Division of Dental and ENT Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K202952
Device Name
Amber Mill Q Series & Amber Mill Direct Series
Indications for Use (Describe)
Once finalized into a suitable design, the Amber Mill O Series and Amber Mill Direct Series are indicated for use as inlays, onlays, veneer, partial crowns and crowns.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
|--|--|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
(K202952)
This summary of 510(K) information is being submitted in accordance with requirements of 21 CFR Part 807.92.
Date: 8/9/2021
## 1. Submitter
HASS CORP. 77-14. Gwahakdanji-ro Gangneung-si, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea, 25452
Tel: +82-70-7712-1300 Fax: +82-33-644-1231
## 2. U.S Agent/Contact Person
Priscilla Chung LK Consulting Group USA, Inc. 1150 Roosevelt STE 200, Irvine CA 92620 Phone: 714.202.5789 Fax: 714-409-3357 Email: juhee.c(@lkconsultinggroup.com
## 3. Device
- . Trade Name: Amber Mill Q Series & Amber Mill Direct Series
- Common Name: Dental Frame Material for Dental Prosthesis
- Classification Name: Porcelain Powder for Clinical Use ●
- Product Code: EIH
- . Classification regulation: 21 CFR 872.6660
## 4. Primary Predicate Device:
Straumann n!ce Glass-Ceramic Blocks by Institut Straumann AG (K160262)
## 5. Description:
Amber Mill Q Series and Amber Mill Direct Series are a lithium disilicate ceramic to be supplied in the form of Blocks. Amber Mill O Series & Amber Mill Direct Series can be fabricated using CAD/CAM technologies. The subject devices are intended to be milled to produce prosthetic restorations for natural and endosseous dental implant abutment borne
{4}------------------------------------------------
teeth. The subject devices are glass type material used for aesthetic purposes of veneers, inlays, onlays, single-unit anterior and posterior crowns.
The ceramics material is composed of SiO2, Li2O, K2O, P2O5, A12O3 and other oxides. It also contains inorganic pigments to provide different shades on the product surface. The subject device offers 18 different size/shape series and each series offers 45 different shades. 18 different sizes are to be used with various equipment for CAD/CAM milling and to meet the needs of patients' various tooth shapes. 45 different shades are offered to meet the needs of different patient's tooth colors. The subject devices don't need sintering since they are provided fully crystallized.
The only difference between Amber Mill Q Series and Amber Mill Direct Series is that the Amber Mill Q series has a hole in the center combined with a zirconia cap. The holes in Amber Mill Q are sizes compatible with abutment, through which are bonded to abutment to be connected to the implant.
The CAD/CAM systems and abutments compatible with Amber Mill Q series are as follows :
| CAD/CAM System: | Sirona Dental CAD/CAM system (K193408) |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------|
| Abutment: | Sirona TiBase (K193408) |
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### 6. Indication for use:
Once finalized into a suitable design, the Amber Mill Q Series and Amber Mill Direct Series are indicated for use as inlays, onlays, veneer, partial crowns and crowns.
#### 7. Basis for Substantial Equivalence
Amber Mill Q Series and Amber Mill Direct Series are substantially equivalent to the Straumann n!ce Glass-Ceramic (K160262) The following comparison table is presented to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
| | Proposed Device | Primary Predicate Device | Comparison Discussion |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) Number | K202952 | K160262 | Equivalent |
| Device Name | Amber Mill Q Series and<br>Amber Mill Direct Series | Straumann n!ce Glass-Ceramic<br>Blocks | - |
| Common Name | Porcelain powder for clinical<br>use | Porcelain powder for clinical<br>use | - |
| Manufacturer | HASS CORP. | Institut Straumann AG | - |
| Indication For Use | Once finalized into a suitable<br>design, the Amber Mill Q<br>Series and Amber Mill Direct<br>Series are indicated for use as<br>inlays, onlays, veneer, partial<br>crowns and crowns. | Once finalized into a suitable<br>design, the n!ceTM glass-<br>ceramic blocks are indicated<br>for use as inlays, onlays,<br>veneer, partial crowns and<br>crowns. | Equivalent |
| Classification Reg | 21 CFR 872.6660 | 21 CFR 872.6660 | Identical |
| FDA Product Code | EIH | EIH | Identical |
| Materials | SiO2, Li2O, K2O,<br>P2O5, Al2O3 and other<br>oxides | SiO2, Li2O, K2O,<br>P2O5, Al2O3 and other oxides | Equivalent |
| Crystallization<br>State as Supplied | Fully crystallized | Fully crystallized | Equivalent |
| Device Design | Block | Block | Equivalent |
| Size | C12 block(10 x 12 x 15mm)<br>C14 block(12 x 14 x 18mm)<br>C16 block(17.5 x 16 x<br>18mm) | C14 block(12.4 x14.5<br>x18.0mm) | (Similar)#1<br>* Proposed device and<br>predicate device are essentially |
| | | | equivalent, but the proposed<br>device has various size of<br>models. |
| Shades | Various<br>Translucency :<br>High translucency(HT)<br>Low translucency(LT)<br>Medium Opacity(MO)<br>Shade :<br>LT/ HT : 16 A-D and 4<br>Bleach<br>MO : 5 MO0- MO4 | Various<br>Translucency :<br>High translucency(HT)<br>Low translucency(LT)<br>Shade :<br>HT/ LT : 6 A-D | Equivalent |
| Principle of<br>Operation | Fabricating restorations<br>using CAD/CAM system | Fabricating restorations using<br>CAD/CAM system | Equivalent |
| Type/Class per<br>ISO 6872 | Type Ⅱ, Class 3 | Type Ⅱ, Class 2 | (Similar)#2<br>* Proposed devices and<br>predicate devices are<br>essentially equivalent, but the<br>indication vary depending on<br>the classification of clinical use<br>in ISO 6872.<br>Classification is determined by<br>mechanical and chemical<br>properties.<br>The result of flexural strength<br>tested according to ISO 6872<br>standard is 519 MPa, so it<br>corresponds to Class 3<br>according to Table 1.<br>Classification table. |
| Flexural strength | > 300MPa<br>(meeting the ISO6872<br>requirements) | > 100MPa<br>(meeting the ISO6872<br>requirements) | Equivalent |
| Chemical solubility | < 100 ug / cm $^{2}$<br>(meeting the ISO6872<br>requirements) | < 100 ug / cm $^{2}$<br>(meeting the ISO6872<br>requirements) | Equivalent |
| Freedom from<br>Extraneous Material | Shall be free from extraneous<br>materials when assessed by<br>visual inspection ( meeting<br>ISO 6872 requirements) | Shall be free from extraneous<br>materials when assessed by<br>visual inspection ( meeting<br>ISO 6872 requirements) | Equivalent |
| Radioactivity | Activity<br>concentration of<br>uranium $^{238}$ less<br>than 1.0Bq g $^{-1}$<br>(meeting the ISO6872<br>requirements) | Activity<br>concentration of<br>uranium $^{238}$ less<br>than 1.0Bq g $^{-1}$<br>(meeting the ISO6872<br>requirements) | Identical |
| Linear of thermal<br>expansion | 11.5±0.5 × 10 $^{-6}$ /°C<br>(meeting the ISO6872<br>requirements) | 12.0±0.5 × 10 $^{-6}$ /°C<br>(meeting the ISO6872<br>requirements) | Equivalent |
| Glass Transition<br>Temperature | Activity<br>concentration of<br>uranium $^{238}$ less | Activity<br>concentration of<br>uranium $^{238}$ less | Equivalent |
| | than 1.0Bq g-1<br>(meeting ISO 6872<br>requirements) | than 1.0Bq g-1<br>(meeting ISO 6872<br>requirements) | |
| Biocompatibility | Non-toxic and biocompatible<br>(Meeting the ISO<br>10993-3, 5, 10 and<br>10993-11<br>Requirements) | Non-toxic and biocompatible<br>(Meeting the ISO<br>10993-5 and<br>10993-10<br>Requirements) | Equivalent |
510(k) summary
{6}------------------------------------------------
{7}------------------------------------------------
Substantial Equivalence Discussion
The subject device has the same intended use and the same principle of operation as the predicate devices. The subject device and the predicate devices might have a slight difference in compositions but all the devices
have SiO2, Li2O, K2O, P2O5, and A12O3 as major components.
Despite this difference, the test results per ISO 6872 shows that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device in physical and chemical properties and meets the necessary requirements.
In addition, the subject device has been tested for Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5), Sensitization (ISO 10993-10), and Irritation (ISO 10993-10) to meet the biocompatibility requirements. Based on the test results and the information provided in this submission, we conclude that the subject device is substantially equipment to the predicate devices.
## 8. Non-Clinical Testing
- . Performance Tests including Flexural strength, Chemical solubility, Freedom from Extraneous Material, Radioactivity, Linear of thermal expansion, Glass Transition Temperature in accordance with ISO 6872
- Biocompatibility tests in accordance with ISO 10993-5, 10, and 11. ●
## 9. Conclusion
The subject device and the predicate device have the same intended use and have the same technological characteristics. Based on the similarities and the test results, we conclude that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.