The device performance was compared against a predicate device (Braun NTF3000) in a study of 81 users to demonstrate oral temperature measurement equivalence.
MyHomeDoc Device vs. Braun Predicate Device for Oral Equivalence Test Report; Comparative performance study
81 users; Sample Size: 81
Braun NTF3000 predicate device
Oral temperature measurement equivalence (difference <= 0.4°C)
Indications for Use
The MyHomeDoc device, combined with a smartphone application, is a multiple-sensor device that is intended to measure, record, and transmit the recorded data of auscultation sound of human body, human body temperature, oxygen saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate, and images of an examined body part. MyHomeDoc device is intended for use by adult lay users in a non-clinical environment. MyHomeDoc application enables counseling with the physician and transmission of the information over an IP network.
Device Story
MyHomeDoc is a multi-sensor handheld unit paired with a smartphone application for home-based health monitoring. It captures auscultation sounds, body temperature (IR sensor), SpO2/pulse rate (reflective pulse oximetry), and images of body parts. The smartphone app controls the unit, processes collected data, and facilitates transmission to remote physicians over an IP network for counseling. Designed for adult lay users, the device provides guidance via software to ensure correct sensor placement. It enables remote clinical assessment by allowing physicians to review transmitted data, potentially improving access to care and facilitating timely clinical decision-making in non-clinical settings.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Compliance with ISO 10993-1 (biocompatibility), ASTM E1965-98 (thermometer accuracy), and IEC 60601 series (electrical safety/EMC). Pulse oximetry validated via hypoxia protocol and simulator testing (30-250 BPM). Stethoscope and otoscope performance validated against gold standards/predicates with positive subjective physician assessment. Usability study confirmed lay-user safety and effectiveness without serious use errors.
Technological Characteristics
Handheld unit with IR temperature sensor, reflective pulse oximeter (660/880 nm), and otoscope/camera. Connectivity via smartphone app over IP network. Standards: ASTM E1965-98 (thermometer), ISO 10993-1 (biocompatibility), IEC 60601-1/1-2/1-6/1-11 (safety/EMC), ISO 80601-2-61 (pulse oximetry), IEC 62471 (photobiological safety), IEC 60529 (ingress protection).
Indications for Use
Indicated for adult lay users in non-clinical environments to measure, record, and transmit auscultation sounds, body temperature, SpO2, pulse rate, and images of body parts for physician counseling.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Manual stethoscope: A mechanical device used to project the sounds associated with the heart, arteries, and veins and other internal organs. Electronic stethoscope: An electrically amplified device used to project the sounds associated with the heart, arteries, and veins and other internal organs.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is a lung sound monitor, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 870.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo in blue, with the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue as well. The FDA is a federal agency responsible for regulating and supervising the safety of food, drugs, and other products.
March 23, 2021
MyHomeDoc Ltd. % Jonathan Kahan Partner Hogan Lovells US LLP 555 Thirteenth Street NW Washington, District of Columbia 20004
Re: K202483
Trade/Device Name: MyHomeDoc Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1875 Regulation Name: Stethoscope Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DQD, FLL, DQA, ERA Dated: March 23, 2021 Received: March 22, 2021
### Dear Jonathan Kahan:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4. Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for LT Stephen Browning Assistant Director DHT2A: Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Diagnostics and Monitoring Devices OHT2: Office of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use Statement
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
**Indications for Use**
| Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 |
|----------------------------------|
| Expiration Date: 06/30/2023 |
| See PRA Statement below. |
| 510(k) Number ( <i>if known</i> ) | K202483 |
|-----------------------------------|---------|
| Device Name | |
MyHomeDoc device
Indications for Use (Describe)
The MyHomeDoc device, combined with a smartphone application, is a multiple-sensor device that is intended to measure, record, and transmit the recorded data of auscultation sound of human body, human body temperature, oxygen saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate, and images of an examined body part.
MyHomeDoc device is intended for use by adult lay users in a non-clinical environment. MyHomeDoc application enables counseling with the physician and transmission of the information over an IP network.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | <label><input checked="checked" type="checkbox"/> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)</label> <label><input type="checkbox"/> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)</label> |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE – CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
FOR FDA USE ONLY
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
***DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.***
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including
the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and
complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any
other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human
Services Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
Staff [PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov](mailto:PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov)
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (6/20) Page 1 of 1 FDA PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
Page 1
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Traditional Premarket Notification Submission - 510(k) MyHomeDoc device 510(k) Number K202483
### Date Prepared: August 28, 2020
#### I. SUBMITTER
MyHomeDoc Ltd. 13 Zarchin St. Ra'anana, 4366241 Tel: +972-(0)4- 9874202
### Contact Person
Jonathan Kahan, Partner Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 Tel:+1 202 637 5794 jonathan.kahan@hoganlovells.com
### Back-up Company Contact:
Orly Maor 25 Sirkin Street Kfar Saba 44421 Israel Tel: +972-9-7453607 oram.ma@gmail.com
#### II. DEVICE
Name of Device: MyHomeDoc device Common or Usual Name: MyHomeDoc device Classification Name: Oximeter, Clinical Electronic Thermometer, Oximeter and Otoscope Regulatory Class: II Product Code: DQD, FLL, DQA, ERA
#### PREDICATE DEVICE III.
MyHomeDoc Ltd. believes that the MyHomeDoc device is substantially equivalent to the following predicate devices:
- Pulse Oximeter- PulseOx 5500 Finger Device, manufactured by SPO Medical Ltd cleared under K040178, Classification name: Oximeter, Product code: DQA, Regulation: 21 CFR 870.2700
{4}------------------------------------------------
- Stethoscope- Tyto Stethoscope manufactured by Tyto care Ltd. cleared under ● K160401, Classification name Electronic stethoscope, Product code: DQD, Regulation: 21 CFR 870.1875
- . Thermometer- Braun No Touch + Forehead NTF3000 Thermometer, manufactured by Kaz USA, Inc, cleared under K163516, Classification: Clinical Electronic Thermometer, Product code: FLL, Regulation: 21 CFR 880.2910
In addition, the following reference device is used in this 510(k):
- Electronic Stethoscope Model 3200, manufactured by 3M Littman, cleared under ● K101834, Classification name Electronic stethoscope, Product code: DRG, Regulation: 21 CFR 870.2910
#### IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The MyHomeDoc device is a home use device is comprised of a handheld unit that connects with a smartphone and a dedicated smartphone software application that runs on the user's personal smartphone An API is defined to enable healthcare providers to communicate with the device.
The Device enables user's examination at home with or without the guidance of a remote physician. It also enables guidance and data examination by a remote physician over an IP network. The Smartphone Application controls the Handheld Unit's functionality and processes and displays the collected data.
#### V. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The MyHomeDoc device, combined with a smartphone application, is a multiple-sensor device that is intended to measure, record, and transmit the recorded data of auscultation sound of human body, human body temperature, oxygen saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate, and images of an examined body part.
MyHomeDoc device is intended for use by adult lay users in a non-clinical environment. MyHomeDoc application enables counseling with the physician and transmission of the information over an IP network.
### COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE VI. PREDICATE DEVICE AND REFERENCE DEVICE
The MyHomeDoc device is substantially equivalent to its predicate devices.
MyHomeDoc device intended use combines the indications of the cleared predicate devices.
{5}------------------------------------------------
The MyHomeDoc device, like the Tyto Stethoscope, is intended for adults to record sounds from adult and pediatric patients' heart and lungs and abdomen in a home environment. Like the PulseOx 5500 predicate, the MyHomeDoc device is intended for saturation and pulse rate measurements. Similar to the Braun Forehead NTFF3000 thermometer, MyHomeDoc device is intended for body temperature determination.
The MyHomeDoc device has similar technological characteristics as the predicate Tyto Stethoscope in that it records and wirelessly transmits the patient's data to the care provider at a different location. Both devices contain software guidance that instructs the user where to place the sensor to measure the auscultation signal. An additional similarity is that the Tyto includes a class I otoscope as well.
The temperature sensor in the MyHomeDoc device is equivalent to its predicate in that both are contact/non-contact IR sensors that measure temperature from the center of the forehead. Both devices then convert this temperature to the oral equivalent and display this temperature in Fahrenheit or Celsius. While the thermometers have the same accuracy, there are slight differences in regards to the measurement range, but as the subject device has a greater range, this does not raise any questions. The company has performed testing demonstrating the performance of the thermometer over this temperature range.
The pulse oximeter in the MyHomeDoc device and the predicate are equivalent in that they both measure change in light intensity at 660 and 880 nm. Both devices perform spot measurement of oxygen saturation and pulse rate at the patient's fingertip. The measurement methods slightly differ in that the predicate measures the transmitted signal. while the subject device assesses the reflected signal.
## VII. PERFORMANCE DATA
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination:
- Biocompatibility evaluation in compliance with ISO 10993-1. -
#### Cleaning, Packaging -
Cleaning validation testing, transportation and use life calculation of the MyHomeDoc device was performed to demonstrate compliance with the relevant standards. All tests were successfully completed.
#### Performance Testing -
Performance testing included the following:
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Name of test | Test description |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Thermometer | |
| Thermometer performance & accuracy<br>testing | Test in compliance to ASTM E1965-98.The<br>MyHomeDoc device met all acceptance criteria.<br>The results of this test demonstrate that the<br>difference between the IR readings (the "Direct<br>mode") and the Black body is less than 0.3°C |
| ASTM E1965-98 Thermometer | The test tables demonstrate compliance of the<br>MyHomeDoc Thermometer component with<br>ASTM E1965-98, Standard Specification for<br>Infrared Thermometers for Intermittent<br>Determination of Patient Temperature |
| MyHomeDoc Device vs. Braun<br>Predicate Device for Oral Equivalence<br>Test Report | The difference between MyHomeDoc and the<br>Brown NTF3000 predicate device was less than<br>or equal to 0.4°C in a 81users. Therefore, the<br>MyHomeDoc device met the acceptance criteria. |
| Pulse oximeter | |
| SpO2 verification protocol and report | The MyHomeDoc device met all acceptance<br>criteria.<br>- displayed SpO2 value for each simulator value.<br>- MyHomeDoc measurements of monotonic<br>increasing/decreasing values are monotonic and<br>align within the 20% range. |
| Pulse rate verification | MyHomeDoc device measured pulse results<br>between 30BPM to 250BPM.<br>MyHomeDoc device met the acceptance criteria. |
| Pulse Oximeter Hypoxia Protocol and<br>Report | The pulse oximeter hypoxia test performed in<br>order to validate the MyHomeDoc device SpO2<br>measurements. The MyHomeDoc device met all<br>acceptance criteria. |
| Stethoscope | |
| Stethoscope Test Report | The MyHomeDoc device and the Littman<br>predicate stethoscope where evaluated.<br>MyHomeDoc devices used in the test met the<br>acceptance criteria. |
| Otoscope | |
| Otoscope Test Report | Line-pair separation test, Color differentiation and<br>Illumination flux were evaluated. MyHomeDoc<br>devices used in the test met the acceptance criteria |
| Otoscope-gold standard vs. MyHomeDoc<br>ear test comparison report | MyHomeDoc images were cleared allowing<br>clinical evaluation, Landmarks of the ear were<br>easily identified and the physician subjective<br>assessment was positive. Therefore, the<br>MyHomeDoc device met the acceptance criteria<br>and MyHomeDoc images are equivalent to those |
| Name of test | Test description |
| | of the gold standard. |
{7}------------------------------------------------
All tests met the predefined acceptance criteria.
#### Software Validation -
The MyHomeDoc software level of concern is moderate. Software verification and validation testing were conducted and documentation was provided as recommended by FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices".
#### Electrical Safely and EMC -
Electrical Safety per IEC 60601-1 and Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) per IEC 60601-1-2 and IEC 60601-1-6 were conducted on the MyHomeDoc device. In addition, the system complies with IEC 60601-1-11, IEC 62471 First edition, ISO 80601-2-61 and IEC 60529, wireless coexistence testing.
#### Usability testing -
Usability study was conducted to evaluate the use-related safety and effectiveness of the MyHomeDoc when used by lay-user via observational data, knowledge task data, and interview data. The purpose of the current study is to demonstrate that MyHomeDoc device can be used by the intended users for the intended uses and under the expected use conditions without serious use errors or problems.
## VII. CONCLUSIONS
The MyHomeDoc device was determined to be substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.