K201734 · Nasaleze International, Ltd. · NUP · Mar 26, 2021 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
K201734
Device Name
AllerBlock Junior
Applicant
Nasaleze International, Ltd.
Product Code
NUP · General Hospital
Decision Date
Mar 26, 2021
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 880.5045
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Pediatric
Indications for Use
AllerBlock Junior is intended for use in adults and children (8 years or older) to treat hay fever and allergy sufferers by promoting alleviation of mild allergic symptoms (i.e., mild nasal irritation including itchy, runny, or congested nasal passages) triggered by the inhalation of various airborne allergens including indoor environmental pollens, house dust, animal hairs, and dust mites. Application of AllerBlock Junior produces a mucous-like gel barrier that evenly coats the nasal membranes and acts to block inhaled allergens within the nasal cavity.
Device Story
AllerBlock Junior is a topical nasal powder administered via a proprietary spray bottle. Input: micronized powder (97% HPMC, 3% strawberry scent). Operation: insufflation into nasal cavity; powder contacts moist mucosa to form a colorless, mucus-like gel barrier. Output: physical barrier coating nasal membranes. Used by patients (adults/children 8+) in home/clinic settings. The gel mechanically blocks inhaled allergens from contacting nasal tissue, reducing allergic rhinitis symptoms. Healthcare providers use the device to provide non-pharmacological symptom relief; patients self-administer to manage hay fever and environmental allergies.
Clinical Evidence
Five clinical studies (N=219 pediatric patients, ages 1.5-18) evaluated safety and effectiveness. Study designs included pre/post-treatment, randomized placebo-controlled, and active-comparator (nasal steroids/oral meds) trials. Primary endpoints included mucociliary clearance and daily allergic rhinitis symptom scores (nasal congestion, discharge, sneezing, itching). Results showed significant reduction in symptom scores and improved mucociliary clearance. Adverse events were reported as few (2-15%) and mild in severity, supporting safety in the pediatric population.
Technological Characteristics
Topical nasal powder consisting of 97% pharmaceutical grade Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC) and 3% strawberry scent. Micronized powder form. Mechanical barrier principle of operation. Administered via proprietary spray bottle. Biocompatibility testing (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation) performed. Shelf life ≥ 3 years at 40°C.
Indications for Use
Indicated for adults and children (8 years or older) suffering from mild allergic rhinitis symptoms (nasal irritation, itching, runny/congested nose) caused by inhaled allergens including pollen, house dust, animal hair, and dust mites.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical recirculating air cleaner is a device used to remove particles from the air for medical purposes. The device may function by electrostatic precipitation or filtration.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: a symbol on the left and the text "FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" on the right. The symbol on the left is a stylized image of a human figure, and the text on the right is in blue. The logo is simple and clean, and it is easily recognizable.
March 26, 2021
Nasaleze International Ltd Matt Duxbury Export Director Old Castletown Road Douglas, Isle of Man Im2 1qa Isle Of Man
Re: K201734
Trade/Device Name: AllerBlock Junior Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.5045 Regulation Name: Medical recirculating air cleaner Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NUP Dated: February 23, 2021 Received: February 25, 2021
Dear Matt Duxbury:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for
{1}------------------------------------------------
devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Shu-Chen Peng, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT1C: Division of ENT, Sleep Disordered Breathing, Respiratory and Anesthesia Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K201734
Device Name AllerBlock Junior
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
AllerBlock Junior is intended for use in adults and children (8 years or older) to treat hay fever and allergy sufferers by promoting alleviation of mild allergic symptoms (i.e., mild nasal irritation including itchy, runny, or congested nasal passages) triggered by the inhalation of various airborne allergens including indoor environmental pollens, house dust, animal hairs, and dust mites.
Application of AllerBlock Junior produces a mucous-like gel barrier that evenly coats the nasal membranes and acts to block inhaled allergens within the nasal cavity.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
X Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(K) SUMMARY
# Contact Information
| Submitter's Name and Address: | Nasaleze International Ltd<br>Nunnery Mills, Old Castletown Road<br>Douglas, Isle of Man, IM2 1QA, British Isles<br>TEL + 44 (0) 1624 611 050 |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name of Contact Person: | Matt Duxbury, Export Director<br>Nasaleze International Ltd. |
| Date Summary was Prepared: | March 25, 2021 |
| Name of Device | |
| Name of the Device: | AllerBlock Junior |
| Regulatory Name:<br>Regulation | Topical Nasal Cream -- Mechanical Allergen Particle Barrier<br>21 CRF 880.5045 / NUP / Class II |
### Predicate Device
K170848 Alzair Allergy Blocker Cleared 06-14-17
### Basis for Submission
- 1. Expanded the Indications for Use to include pediatric patients (8 years or older).
- 2. Substituted Strawberry Powder for Mint -- strawberry scent is preferable for children.
- 3. Updated the product labeling as follows:
- Includes specific Instructions for children and a new Package Insert ●
- Designates that AllerBlock Junior is indicated for Over-the-Counter (OTC) use ●
# Product Description
AllerBlock Junior is composed of pharmaceutical grade Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC; 97%) and high quality strawberry scent (3%) which has been formulated into a micronized powder of fine particles of inert cellulose. AllerBlock Junior is administered by insufflation into the nose using a proprietary spray bottle which enables the powder to be applied evenly as a fine mist to the inside of the nasal cavity.
When the powder comes into contact with the moist surface of the nasal mucosa, it almost immediately forms a colorless, mucus-like fine gel which coats the inside of the nasal cavity. The inert gel acts as a mechanical barrier -- making it more difficult for inhaled allergens to come into contact with the skin in the nasal interior, and thus reducing the intensity of allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms.
### Indications for Use
AllerBlock Junior is intended for use in adults and children (8 years or older) to treat hay fever and allergy sufferers by promoting alleviation of mild allergic symptoms (i.e., mild nasal irritation including itchy, runny, or congested nasal passages) triggered by the inhalation of various airborne allergens including indoor and outdoor environmental pollens, house dust, animal hairs, and dust mites.
Application of AllerBlock Junior produces a mucous-like gel barrier that evenly coats the nasal membranes and acts to block inhaled allergens within the nasal cavity.
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Comparison to Predicate
The table below provides a high level summary of the similarities and differences between the Predicate and Subject products.
| | PREDICATE DEVICE | SUBJECT DEVICE |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| 510(K) | K170848 | K201734 |
| PRODUCT | Alzair Allergy Blocker | <b>AllerBlock Junior</b> |
| INDICATION | Adult Patients | Adults and Children (8 years or older) |
| INGREDIENTS | HPMC Powder 98.5%<br>Peppermint Powder 1.5% | HPMC Powder 97%<br><b>Strawberry Powder 3%</b> |
| OTC vs. Rx Use | Rx Use | <b>OTC</b> |
| REGULATION | 880.5045 / NUP | SAME |
### Safety and Performance Testing
| Safety Testing<br>and Toxicology | HPMC and strawberry scent flavoring are recognized as GRAS in the US. HPMC is<br>remarkably safe when given orally. The quantity, grade, and route of administration<br>of HPMC used in AllerBlock Junior do not present any serious toxicological risks. |
|----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Biocompatibility | Biocompatibility testing included cytotoxicity, sensitization, and irritation. The results<br>demonstrated that there are no biocompatibility concerns with AllerBlock Junior. |
| Stability / Shelf Life | Stability and shelf life testing results support a shelf life of ≥ 3 yrs at 40°C. Once the<br>bottle is opened, labeling directs the consumer to use the product within 6 months. |
### Clinical Studies in Children
The safety and effectiveness of AllerBlock Junior (HPMC + Mint) has been clinically investigated in 5 Clinical Studies comprising N=219 pediatric patients as summarized below. The study results are summarized on the next page -- followed by a discussion of the treated patient population, study design, effectiveness and safety results reference to adverse effects and complications), and the basis for determination of substantial equivalence.
| | STUDY 1 | STUDY 2 | STUDY 3 | STUDY 4 | STUDY 5 |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| YEAR | 2005 | 2009 | 2010 | 2010 | 2019 |
| AUTHORS | Aivazis V, Bourli E,<br>Maratou E, Mavroudi A | Zakharzhevskaya T,<br>Sidorenko I, Treskunov V | Aberg N, Dahl A, Benson M | Geppe N, Snegotskaya M,<br>Kolosova N, Konopelko O | Chen X, Guan WJ, Sun SX,<br>Zheng PY, Sun LH, et al |
| STUDY TITLE | Study of Mucociliary<br>Clearance in Children with<br>AR: Before & After 6<br>Weeks of Therapy with<br>Natural Cellulose Powder | Efficacy and Safety of<br>Nasaleze in Prevention and<br>Treatment of Persistent AR<br>in Adults and Children | Nasally Applied Cellulose<br>Powder Reduces SAR<br>Symptoms: Double-Blind,<br>Placebo-Controlled Trial in<br>Children & Adolescents | Intranasal Inert Cellulose<br>Powder in Preventing<br>Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis in<br>Children | Effects of Intranasal<br>Cellulose Powder in<br>Children with Allergic<br>Rhinitis -- Randomized-<br>Controlled Trial |
| TREATMENT | Nasaleze | Nasaleze | Randomized<br>Nasaleze vs. Placebo | Randomized - Nasaleze vs.<br>Standard of Care Oral Meds | Randomized - Nasaleze vs.<br>Nasal Steroids vs. Placebo |
| DURATION | 6 weeks | 4 weeks | 4 weeks | 4 weeks | 8 weeks |
| PT POPULATION | Allergic Rhinitis | Persistent Allergic Rhinitis | History of SAR (in Spring) | Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis | Perennial Allergic Rhinitis |
| · Total Enrollment | Total Enrollment<br>N=100 | Total Enrollment<br>N=48 | Total Enrollment<br>N=53 | Total Enrollment<br>N=110 | Total Enrollment<br>N=121 |
| · Children Treated | Children Treated<br>N=100 | Children Treated<br>N=23 | Children Treated<br>N=25 | Children Treated<br>N=30 | Children Treated<br>N=41 |
| · Age Range + Mean | Ages 1½ - 8 yrs | Ages 2 - 18 yrs<br>11 yrs | Ages 8 - 18 yrs<br>11 yrs | Ages 4 - 14 yrs<br>8 yrs | Ages 6 - 11 yrs<br>8 yrs |
| PATIENT<br>DEMOGRAPHIC<br>INFORMATION | Male/Female<br>N=53/47 | Duration of AR 6 yrs (1-15) | NASALEZE<br>N = 25<br>15/10 | NASALEZE<br>N = 30<br>3.1 yrs<br>50%<br>67% | NASALEZE<br>N = 41<br>3.4 yrs<br>100%<br>71% |
| | Skin Test Positive N=78/93 | Skin Test Positive 80%<br>Pollenosis (Hay Fever) 80% | | | |
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Figure/3 description: The image shows the text "Clinical Studies in Children (continued)". The text is in bold font. The words are arranged on a single line.
Image /page/5/Figure/4 description: This image contains efficacy and safety results from a clinical study. The efficacy results show nasal mucous clearance and allergic rhinitis symptom severity scores. The safety results include tolerability, adverse effects, and side effects, with specific data on non-serious adverse events for steroids, nasaleze, and placebo treatments. Several graphs are included to show allergic rhinitis symptoms, C-ACT scores, FEV1, nasal discharge, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and ocular symptoms.
{6}------------------------------------------------
# Clinical Studies in Children (continued)
### Discussion
# · Study Design
All 5 studies were well-controlled clinical studies in which pediatric patients either acted as their own control (Pre vs. Post-Treatment with AllerBlock Junior) or were randomized to receive AllerBlock Junior vs. Placebo.
# · Treated Patient Population
AllerBlock Junior is indicated to treat both adults and children (8 years or older) while the predicate was intended for use in adults only. The specified minimum age of 8 years is based on pooling the age distributions from the 5 clinical studies and observing that approximately half of the patients treated with the Nasaleze product were children 8 years or younger.
# · Effectiveness Results
- = Study 1 Assessed mucociliary clearance as measure of treatment effectiveness. Significant decrease of clearance observed in children in this study after treatment (especially those with mean value > 31 minutes) is due to the effect of cellulose -- since the children received no other therapy.
- = Study 2-5 Evaluated allergic rhinitis daily symptom scores as reported by subjects. These studies all showed consistent reductions in AR symptoms including nasal congestion and discharge, sneezing, nasal and ocular itching.
# · Safety Results
In all 5 studies of children, the reported adverse effects and complications were few in number (2-15%) and mild in level of severity. These results from N=219 pediatric patients treated with AllerBlock Junior demonstrate product safety.
# · Basis for Determination of Substantial Equivalence
- = Product Formulation Strawberry scent flavoring (3%) has been substituted for mint (1.5%): and Ingredients
- Strawberry scent flavoring is recognized as GRAS in the US
- Powder particle size remains essentially unchanged
This change continues to support product safety and effectiveness.
- · Clinical Equivalence For the Pediatric Studies, the product investigated was the Allergy Blocker formulation. Since AllerBlock Junior is so similar to Allergy Blocker (see above), this difference does not impact the application of the safety and effectiveness results to support clinical equivalence.
# Conclusions
By virtue of its physical characteristics, intended use, and performance testing, AllerBlock Junior is substantially equivalent to Alzair Allergy Blocker. AllerBlock Junior poses no safety risk to users, and has been shown to significantly block allergen entry into the nasal mucosa. Clinical studies of children have demonstrated that AllerBlock Junior's mucous-like gel barrier is beneficial to hay fever sufferers through the reduction of nasal allergen exposure and consequently a reduction in symptoms from seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.