K201473 · Exoatlet Asia Co. , Ltd. · PHL · Jul 16, 2021 · Physical Medicine
Device Facts
Record ID
K201473
Device Name
ExoAtlet-II
Applicant
Exoatlet Asia Co. , Ltd.
Product Code
PHL · Physical Medicine
Decision Date
Jul 16, 2021
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 890.3480
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The ExoAtlet-II is intended to perform ambulatory functions in rehabilitation under the supervision of a trained physical therapist for the following population with upper extremity motor function at least 4/5 in both arms: Individuals with spinal cord injuries at levels T4 to L5 Individuals with spinal cord injuries at levels of C7 to T3 (ASIA D) The therapist must complete a training program prior to use of the device. The device is not intended for sports or stair climbing.
Device Story
ExoAtlet-II is a battery-powered lower extremity exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation in clinical settings (hospitals, gait labs). Operated by a trained physical therapist; requires user upper extremity motor function (4/5). System includes exoskeleton, ExoCrutch, and Tablet PC. Device assists with sit, stand, and walk functions; provides mechanical support to legs and torso. Therapist uses tablet to monitor and control; training program required for certification. Failsafe mechanism locks knees and pelvis during failure. Benefits include assisted mobility for spinal cord injury patients. Differences from predicate include lack of turning function, battery specs, and range of motion; clinical testing confirmed these do not impact safety/effectiveness.
Clinical Evidence
Open-label, non-randomized clinical study (n=20) of subjects 18+ with spinal cord injuries (T4-L5 or C7-T4, ASIA D). 19/20 subjects completed 10 Meter Walk Test and 6-minute walk test (6 MWT). 18/20 subjects rated comfort 8-10/10; 2/20 rated 6/10. No adverse skin events reported.
Technological Characteristics
Powered lower extremity exoskeleton; 25 kg weight. Rechargeable lithium batteries (25.55V, 5700mAh). Adjustable hip, knee, ankle range of motion. Connectivity via Tablet PC. Complies with IEC 60601-1 (electrical safety), IEC 60601-1-2 (EMC), and ISO 11334-1 (crutches).
Indications for Use
Indicated for individuals aged 18+ with spinal cord injuries at levels T4-L5 or C7-T3 (ASIA D) and upper extremity motor function of at least 4/5 in both arms. Contraindicated for sports or stair climbing.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A powered lower extremity exoskeleton is a prescription device that is composed of an external, powered, motorized orthosis that is placed over a person's paralyzed or weakened limbs for medical purposes.
Special Controls
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act, the Powered Exoskeleton is subject to the following special controls:
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) Elements of the device materials that may contact the patient must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(2) Appropriate analysis/testing must validate electromagnetic compatibility/interference (EMC/EMI), electrical safety, thermal safety, mechanical safety, battery performance and safety, and wireless performance, if applicable.
(3) Appropriate software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
(4) Design characteristics must ensure geometry and materials composition are consistent with intended use.
(5) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. Performance testing must include:
(i) Mechanical bench testing (including durability testing) to demonstrate that the device will withstand forces, conditions, and environments encountered during use;
(ii) Simulated use testing (
*i.e.,* cyclic loading testing) to demonstrate performance of device commands and safeguard under worst case conditions and after durability testing;(iii) Verification and validation of manual override controls are necessary, if present;
(iv) The accuracy of device features and safeguards; and
(v) Device functionality in terms of flame retardant materials, liquid/particle ingress prevention, sensor and actuator performance, and motor performance.
(6) Clinical testing must demonstrate a reasonable assurance of safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use when used under the proposed conditions of use, which must include considerations for:
(i) Level of supervision necessary, and
(ii) Environment of use (
*e.g.,* indoors and/or outdoors) including obstacles and terrain representative of the intended use environment.(7) A training program must be included with sufficient educational elements so that upon completion of training program, the clinician, user, and companion can:
(i) Identify the safe environments for device use,
(ii) Use all safety features of device, and
(iii) Operate the device in simulated or actual use environments representative of indicated environments and use.
(8) Labeling for the Physician and User must include the following:
(i) Appropriate instructions, warning, cautions, limitations, and information related to the necessary safeguards of the device, including warning against activities and environments that may put the user at greater risk.
(ii) Specific instructions and the clinical training needed for the safe use of the device, which includes:
(A) Instructions on assembling the device in all available configurations;
(B) Instructions on fitting the patient;
(C) Instructions and explanations of all available programs and how to program the device;
(D) Instructions and explanation of all controls, input, and outputs;
(E) Instructions on all available modes or states of the device;
(F) Instructions on all safety features of the device; and
(G) Instructions for properly maintaining the device.
(iii) Information on the patient population for which the device has been demonstrated to have a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.
(iv) Pertinent non-clinical testing information (
*e.g.,* EMC, battery longevity).(v) A detailed summary of the clinical testing including:
(A) Adverse events encountered under use conditions,
(B) Summary of study outcomes and endpoints, and
(C) Information pertinent to use of the device including the conditions under which the device was studied (
*e.g.,* level of supervision or assistance, and environment of use (*e.g.,* indoors and/or outdoors) including obstacles and terrain).
Predicate Devices
Ekso™ (version 1.1) and Ekso GT™ (version 1.2) (K143690)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the symbol of the Department of Health & Human Services on the left and the FDA acronym followed by the full name of the agency, "U.S. Food & Drug Administration," on the right. The FDA part of the logo is in blue, with the acronym in a solid blue square and the agency's name in a lighter shade of blue.
July 16, 2021
ExoAtlet Asia Co. Ltd. Allison Komiyama, PhD Principal Consultant AcKnowledge Regulatory Strategies, LLC 2251 San Diego Ave. Suite B-257 San Diego, California 92110
Re: K201473
Trade/Device Name: ExoAtlet-II Regulation Number: 21 CFR 890.3480 Regulation Name: Powered Lower Extremity Exoskeleton Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PHL Dated: June 16, 2021 Received: June 16, 2021
Dear Dr. Komiyama:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Image /page/1/Picture/5 description: The image shows the name "Tushar Bansal -S" in a large, sans-serif font. The text is black and appears to be centered on a white background. The letters are evenly spaced, and the overall impression is clean and legible.
For Heather Dean, PhD Assistant Director, Acute Injury Devices Team DHT5B: Division of Neuromodulation and Physical Medicine Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K201473
Device Name ExoAtlet-II
Indications for Use (Describe)
The ExoAtlet-II is intended to perform ambulatory functions in rehabilitation under the supervision of a trained physical therapist for the following population with upper extremity motor function at least 4/5 in both arms:
· Individuals with spinal cord injuries at levels T4 to L5
- · Individuals with spinal cord injuries at levels of C7 to T3 (ASIA D)
The therapist must complete a training program prior to use of the device.
The device is not intended for sports or stair climbing.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for EXOATLET. The logo is in a sans-serif font, with the "EXO" portion in a bright blue color and the "ATLET" portion in black. The letters are all capitalized and have a modern, clean design.
#### DATE PREPARED
July 16, 2021
#### MANUFACTURER AND 510(k) OWNER
ExoAtlet Asia Co. Ltd. 4582 S. Ulster Street, Suite 205 Denver, CO 80237 Telephone: Official Contact: Bret Bostock, CEO ExoAtlet US
#### REPRESENTATIVE/CONSULTANT
Allison C. Komiyama, Ph.D., R.A.C. Michelle Rubin-Onur, Ph.D. AcKnowledge Regulatory Strategies, LLC +1 (619) 458-9547 Telephone: Email: akomiyama@acknowledge-rs.com, mrubin@acknowledge-rs.com Website: https://www.acknowledge-rs.com/
### DEVICE INFORMATION
| Proprietary Name/Trade Name: | ExoAtlet-II |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Powered Exoskeleton |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 890.3480 |
| Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | PHL |
| Premarket Review: | Neurology |
| Review Panel: | Neuromodulation and Physical Medicine Devices (DHT5B) |
#### PREDICATE DEVICE IDENTIFICATION
The ExoAtlet-II is substantially equivalent to the following predicates:
| 510(k) Number | Predicate Device Name / Manufacturer | Primary Predicate |
|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
| K143690 | Ekso™ (version 1.1) and Ekso GT™ (version 1.2) /<br>Ekso Bionics, Inc. | ✓ |
The predicate devices have not been subject to a design related recall.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for EXOATLET. The logo is written in a sans-serif font, with the first three letters, "EXO," in blue. The remaining letters, "ATLET," are in gray. The logo is simple and modern.
#### DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The ExoAtlet-II is intended to perform ambulatory functions in rehabilitation institutions, hospitals, or similar institutions under the supervision of a healthcare professional (HCP) such as a trained physical therapist. The ExoAtlet-II is indicated for individuals with spinal cord injuries at levels T4-L5 and individuals with spinal cord injuries at levels of C7-T3. All users must have upper extremity motor function of at least 4/5 in both arms. The ExoAtlet-II is intended for multiple users in a clinical setting (i.e., gait lab or rehabilitation center) under supervision. The ExoAtlet-II includes a battery powered exoskeleton, an ExoCrutch, and a Tablet PC.
ExoAtlet-II is designed to be operated with a trained physical therapist who has received preliminary training on the Exoskeleton operation. This therapist will be familiar with the rules of the use and operational documentation. Training is conducted in a designated medical facility that is representative of the indicated environments (e.g., hospital, outpatient physical therapy clinic or similar). The training identifies safe environments of device use and uses all of the safety features found in the subject device. The training manual will be provided with the user manual along with a trainee itinerary and a trainee certification exam. The trainee needs to pass 80% of the exam questions to obtain certification.
#### INDICATIONS FOR USE
The ExoAtlet-II is intended to perform ambulatory functions in rehabilitation under the supervision of a trained physical therapist for the following population with upper extremity motor function at least 4/5 in both arms:
- Individuals with spinal cord injuries at levels T4 to L5
- Individuals with spinal cord injuries at levels of C7 to T3 (ASIA D)
The therapist must successfully complete a training program prior to use of the device. The device is not intended for sports or stair climbing.
### COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
ExoAtlet believes that the ExoAtlet-II is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices based on the information summarized here:
The subject device has a similar design and dimensions as the devices cleared in K143690. The subject device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics (i.e., energy source, maximum user weight, and type of surface the device can function on) to the devices cleared in K143690. The ExoAtlet-II has undergone testing to ensure that any differences in technological characteristics (i.e., ability of user mobility, walking speed, grade of inclination, and range of motion) do not affect safety and effectiveness when compared to the predicate devices.
{5}------------------------------------------------
# EXOATLET
| | Subject Device | Predicate Device | |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | ExoAtlet Asia Co. Ltd. | Ekso Bionics, Inc. | Statement of |
| | | | Equivalence |
| | ExoAtlet-II | Ekso™ (version 1.1) and Ekso GT™ (version 1.2) | |
| | K201473 | K143690 | |
| Indications for | The ExoAtlet-II is intended to perform ambulatory functions in | The Ekso™ (version 1.1) and Ekso GT™ (version 1.2) are intended | Different to the |
| Use | rehabilitation institutions under the supervision of a trained | to perform ambulatory functions in rehabilitation institutions | predicate. The subject |
| | physical therapist for the following population with upper | under the supervision of a trained physical therapist for the | device is not intended to |
| | extremity motor function at least 4/5 in both arms: | following population with upper extremity motor function of at | be used by individuals |
| | Individuals with spinal cord injuries at | least 4/5 in both arms: | with hemiplegia whereas |
| | levels T4 to L5 | ● Individuals with hemiplegia due to stroke | the predicate device is. |
| | Individuals with spinal cord injuries at | ● Individuals with spinal cord injuries at levels T4 to | Both the subject and |
| | levels of C7 to T3 (ASIA D) | L5 | predicate device include<br>a training program prior |
| | The therapist must successfully complete a training program | ● Individuals with spinal cord injuries at levels of<br>C7 to T3 (ASIA D). | to use of the device. |
| | prior to use of the device. The device is not intended for sports | The therapist must complete a training program prior to use of | Both devices are not |
| | or stair climbing. | the device. The devices are not intended for sports or stair | intended for sports or |
| | | climbing. | stair climbing. |
| Product Codes / | PHL / 21 CFR 890.3480 | PHL / 21 CFR 890.3480 | Identical to the |
| Regulation | | | predicate. No impact on |
| Number | | | safety or effectiveness. |
| Regulation | Powered lower extremity exoskeleton | Powered lower extremity exoskeleton | Identical to the |
| Description | | | predicate. No impact on |
| | | | safety and effectiveness. |
| Technical Characteristics | | | |
| Components | Exoskeleton<br>ExoCrutch<br>Tablet PC | ● Exoskeleton<br>● Mobile application | Different to the |
| | | | predicate device. Clinical |
| | | | evidence demonstrates<br>that there is no impact |
| | | | on safety and |
| | | | effectiveness. |
| Exoskeleton | 25 kg | 23 kg | Different to the |
| Weight | | | predicate device. |
| | | | Performance and clinical |
| | | | testing demonstrate that |
| | | | there is no impact on |
| | | | safety and effectiveness. |
| Body Coverage | Worn over legs and upper body with rigid torso | Worn over legs and upper body with rigid torso | Identical to the |
| | | | predicate device. No |
| | | | impact on safety and |
| | | | effectiveness. |
| Size of | Adjustable upper leg, lower leg, and hip width | Adjustable upper leg, lower leg, and hip width , control unit | Identical to the |
| Components | | integrated into the torso | predicate device. No |
| | | | impact on safety and |
| | | | effectiveness. |
| Ability of User<br>Mobility | | | |
| | SitStandWalk | SitStandWalkTurn | Different from the<br>predicate device. The<br>ExoAtlet-II does not<br>turn. Effectiveness of the<br>sit, stand, and walk<br>functions were<br>evaluated through<br>clinical testing. |
| Mobility Aid | Crutch, Walker | Crutch, Walker | Identical to the<br>predicate device. No<br>impact on safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Energy Source | Rechargeable lithium batteries 25.55V, 5700mAh, 4 hours of<br>continuous usage per charge | Rechargeable lithium batteries 48.1V, 30A peak current, 1 hour of<br>continuous usage per charge | Different from the<br>predicate device. The<br>battery of the ExoAtlet-II<br>can be charged for<br>longer. Safety concerns<br>regarding battery safety<br>were evaluated through<br>electrical safety and<br>EMC testing. |
| Maximum User<br>Weight | 100 kg (220 lbs) | 100 kg (220 lbs) | Identical to the<br>predicate device. No<br>impact on safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| User Height | 1.60-1.90 m | 1.58-1.88 m | Different to the<br>predicate device.<br>Performance and clinical<br>testing demonstrate that<br>there is no impact on<br>safety and effectiveness. |
| Walking Speed | 1.5 km/hr | ~ 2 km/hr | Different from the<br>predicate device. The<br>ExoAtlet-II speed is<br>slightly slower and does<br>not pose an increased<br>safety risk; the reduced<br>speed of the device was<br>evaluated through<br>clinical testing. |
| Grade of<br>Inclination | 0-5º | 1.15º | Different from the<br>predicate device. The<br>ExoAtlet-II can handle a<br>greater grade of<br>inclination. Safety<br>concerns regarding the<br>increased inclination<br>was evaluated through<br>clinical testing. |
| Type of Surface | Smooth, cement, carpet | Smooth, cement, carpet | Identical to the<br>predicate device. No<br>impact on safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Range of Motion | Hips: 108º flexion to 21º extension Knees: 112º flexion to 2º extension Ankles: 15º flexion to 0-15º extension | Hips: 135º flexion to 20º extension Knees: 130º flexion to 0º extension Ankles: 10º flexion to 10º extension | Different from the<br>predicate device. The<br>ExoAtlet-II has a larger<br>range of motion in the<br>hips, knees, and ankles.<br>Safety and effectiveness<br>were evaluated through<br>clinical testing. |
| Fall Detection<br>and Mitigation | None | None | Identical to the<br>predicate device. No<br>impact on safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Failsafe Feature | Yes, in the event of a failure-knees and pelvis become locked | Yes, in the event of a failure-knees become locked and hips free | Different from the<br>predicate device. The<br>ExoAtlet-II locks the<br>knees and pelvis. Safety<br>concerns regarding this<br>locking were evaluated<br>through clinical testing.<br>The therapist training<br>program also educates<br>the therapist on what to<br>do under this<br>circumstance |
| Operating<br>temperature | 0°C to 35°C | -12°C to 40°C | Different from the<br>predicate device. The<br>ExoAtlet-II can be<br>operated at a<br>temperature that is<br>within the predicate's<br>operating range. Any<br>possible effect on device<br>function was evaluated<br>through electrical safety<br>and EMC testing, as well<br>as performance testing. |
| Battery Charge<br>Time | 4 hours | 1 hour | Different from the<br>predicate device. The<br>ExoAtlet-II can remain<br>charged for longer.<br>Battery safety and<br>effectiveness were<br>evaluated through<br>electrical safety and<br>EMC testing, and clinical<br>testing. |
| Expected useable<br>life | 5 years | 4 years | Different from the<br>predicate device. The<br>ExoAtlet-II has a slightly<br>longer shelf life. The<br>difference in shelf life<br>was evaluated through<br>durability testing. |
| Testing | | | |
| Performance<br>Testing | Software Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility Durability Clinical | Software Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility Durability Clinical | Identical to the<br>predicate device. No<br>impact on safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Electrical safety<br>Testing | IEC 60601-1 | IEC 60601-1 | Identical to the<br>predicate device. No<br>impact on safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| EMC<br>Compatibility<br>testing | IEC 60601-1-2 | IEC 60601-1-2 | Identical to the<br>predicate device. No<br>impact on safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Clinical | Yes | Yes | Identical to the<br>predicate device. No<br>impact on safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Training Program | Yes | Yes | Identical to the predicate device. No impact on safety and effectiveness. |
| Certification Program | Yes | Yes | Identical to the predicate device. No impact on safety and effectiveness. |
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "EXOATLET" in a stylized font. The "EXO" portion of the word is in blue, while the "ATLET" portion is in black. The font is sans-serif and has a modern, minimalist look.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for EXOATLET. The logo is in a sans-serif font. The letters "EXO" are in blue, while the letters "ATLET" are in black.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/8/Picture/1 description: The image shows the word "EXOATLET" in a stylized font. The "EXO" portion of the word is in a light blue color, while the "ATLET" portion is in black. The font is sans-serif and has a modern, minimalist look.
{9}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/9/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "EXOATLET" in a stylized font. The "EXO" portion of the word is in a bright blue color, while the "ATLET" portion is in a light gray color. The font is modern and sleek, with sharp angles and clean lines. The logo appears to be for a sports or fitness-related company.
{10}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/10/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for "EXO ATLET". The word "EXO" is in a blue color, while the word "ATLET" is in black. The font is sans-serif and modern. The logo is simple and clean.
## SUMMARY OF NON-CLINICAL TESTING
No FDA performance standards have been established for the ExoAtlet-II.
Bench Testing: The elbow crutches provided in the ExoAtlet-II were testing in compliance to:
- . ISO 11334-1:2007 Assistive products for walking manipulated by one arm -Requirements and test methods — Part 1: Elbow crutches
Software Verification: The software development and testing were executed in compliance to:
- . IEC 60601-1:2005, COR1:2006, COR2:2007, AMD1: 2012 Medical electrical equipment -Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance
- IEC 62304:2006 Medical device software Software life cycle processes ●
Electromagnetic Compatibility and Electrical Safety: The subject device was tested in compliance to:
- IEC 60601-1:2005, COR1:2006, COR2:2007, AMD1: 2012 Medical electrical equipment -. Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance
- IEC 60601-1-2: 2014 Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic disturbances - Requirements and tests
- . IEC 60601-1-6:11 Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-6: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral standard: Usability
- CISPR 11: 2015 (Class A, Group 1) Industrial, scientific and medical equipment - Radiofrequency disturbance characteristics - Limits and methods of measurement
- . IEC 61000-3-2: 2014 Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 3-2: Limits – Limits for harmonic current emissions (equipment input current ≤ 16 A per phase)
- . IEC 61000-3-3: 2013 Amendment 1 - Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 3-3: Limits - Limitation of voltage changes, voltage fluctuations and flicker in public lowvoltage supply systems, for equipment with rated current ≤ 16 A per phase and not subject to conditional connection
- IEC 62368-1: 2014 (Second Edition) Audio/video, information and communication technology equipment - Part 1: Safety requirements
- IEC 62133: 2012 (Second Edition) Secondary cells and batteries containing alkaline or other non-acid electrolytes – Safety requirements for portable sealed secondary lithium cells, and for batteries made from them, for use in portable application – Part 2: Lithium systems
## SUMMARY OF CLINICAL TESTING
ExoAtlet conducted an open label, non-randomized clinical study to assess the safety and effectiveness of the ExoAtlet-II in subjects, 18 years and older, with spinal cord injuries in the T4-L5 or C7-T4 range and type D neurological disorders according to the ASIA scale (n=20).
{11}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/11/Picture/0 description: The image shows the text "510(k) Summary" in a large, bold font. The text is black and appears to be centered on a white background. The text is likely a title or heading for a document or presentation.
Image /page/11/Picture/1 description: The image shows the word "EXOATLET" in a stylized font. The "EXO" portion of the word is in a bright blue color, while the "ATLET" portion is in a dark gray color. The font is sans-serif and appears to be custom-designed, with unique shapes for some of the letters.
19 of the 20 subjects successfully completed the 10 Meter Walk Test and the six-minute walk test (6 MWT). One subject was unable to complete the 6 MWT due to insufficient physical fitness. The surveys found that all of the subjects were able to use the subject device and on a scale from 1-10 (worst to best), 18 of the 20 subjects rated their comfort from eight out of ten to a ten out of ten. Two subjects rated their comfort a six out of ten. Additionally, none of the skin assessments found any adverse events related to biocompatibility such as abrasions, dry flaky skin, cut, eschar, or rash before, during, or after use of the ExoAtlet-II.
### CONCLUSION
Based on the testing performed, including clinical testing, software validation, and electrical safety testing, it can be concluded that the subject device does not raise new issues of safety or effectiveness compared to the predicate devices. The similar indications for use, technological characteristics, and performance characteristics for the proposed ExoAtlet-II are assessed to be substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.