The ETHICON Linx® Esophagus Sizing Tool for the LINX® Reflux Management System is a laparoscopic accessory used to estimate the appropriate size LINX® device.
Device Story
The ETHICON Linx Esophagus Sizing Tool is a single-use, sterile, laparoscopic instrument used during LINX implant surgery. It features a proximal handset with a thumbwheel and a distal shaft with a soft polymeric circular curved tip. The device is operated by a surgeon; the thumbwheel allows one-handed extension and retraction of the distal tip. Magnets on the shaft and tip allow the user to form a loop around the esophagus. By retracting slack, the surgeon achieves circumferential contact with the esophagus. A numerical indicator on the handle correlates to the bead count of the LINX implant, guiding the surgeon in selecting the correct implant size. The device is manually powered and does not require external energy. It benefits the patient by ensuring the LINX device is appropriately sized for the anatomy, facilitating proper placement and function of the reflux management system.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data was provided. Substantial equivalence was demonstrated through bench testing, including trocar compatibility, shaft bending force, joint strength, loop extension/retraction force, material corrosion/visual inspection, dimensional accuracy, tissue damage minimization, human factors/ease of use, and reliability testing. Biocompatibility was evaluated per ISO 10993-1:2018 and confirmed non-pyrogenic.
Technological Characteristics
Manually powered laparoscopic sizing tool; single-use; sterile (Cobalt 60 irradiation, SAL 10^-6). Features a thumbwheel-actuated polymeric distal loop and magnetic coupling. Materials evaluated per ISO 10993-1:2018. No software or external energy source.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use as a laparoscopic accessory to estimate the appropriate size of the LINX® Reflux Management System implant in patients undergoing the procedure.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A laparoscopic gastrointestinal sizing tool is a prescription use device intended for laparoscopically measuring an extraluminal dimensional parameter of the indicated gastrointestinal organs.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) Performance testing must demonstrate that the sizing tool performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. Performance testing must include the following:
(i) Trocar compatibility, which includes shaft bending force characterization;
(ii) Joint strength tensile testing;
(iii) Distal loop extension/retraction force characterization;
(iv) Material selection analysis, which includes corrosion and visual inspection; and
(v) Accuracy of the dimensional measurement.
(2) Performance testing must support the sterility and/or reprocessing and shelf life of the patient-contacting components of the device.
(3) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Labeling of the device must include the following:
(i) A statement regarding metal allergies if the device is made from metallic components;
(ii) Specific instructions for proper device use including information regarding the following:
(A) Inspection of device prior to use;
(B) Surgical access techniques or methodologies;
(C) Instructions for avoiding structural damage to vagus nerve bundle;
(D) Trocar compatibility;
(E) Sizing methodology; and
(F) Minimum and maximum dimensional parameters that the device is capable of measuring.
(iii) Identification of the associated parent device with which the sizing tool has been demonstrated to be compatible; and
(iv) An expiration date.
Predicate Devices
Q191422/S001
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health and Human Services logo on the left and the FDA text logo on the right. The FDA text logo is in blue and includes the acronym "FDA" followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in a stacked format.
July 9, 2020
Torax Medical, Inc. Joseph Ciccone Associate Director, Regulatory Affairs 4188 Lexington Avenue, N Shoreview, MN 55126
Re: K201035
Trade/Device Name: ETHICON Linx Esophagus Sizing Tool Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.5360 Regulation Name: Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Sizing Tool Regulatory Class: II Product Code: QJN Dated: April 17, 2020 Received: April 20, 2020
Dear Joseph Ciccone:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling
{1}------------------------------------------------
(21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4. Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for
Shanil P. Haugen, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT3A: Division of Renal, Gastrointestinal, Obesity and Transplant Devices OHT3: Office of GastroRenal, ObGyn, General Hospital and Urology Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K201035
Device Name ETHICON Linx® Esophagus Sizing Tool
Indications for Use (Describe)
The ETHICON Linx® Esophagus Sizing Tool for the LINX® Reflux Management System is a laparoscopic accessory used to estimate the appropriate size LINX® device.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) Summarv
| Submitter Information: | Torax Medical Inc.<br>4188 Lexington Avenue North<br>Shoreview, MN 55126 |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Application Correspondent: | Joseph Ciccone<br>Associate Director, Regulatory Affairs<br>Torax Medical Inc.<br>Telephone: (908) 218-2853<br>Email: jciccon1@its.jnj.com |
| Date Prepared: | July 9, 2020 |
| Device Trade Name: | ETHICON Linx® Esophagus Sizing Tool |
| Regulation Name: | Laparoscopic gastrointestinal sizing tool |
| Classification Regulation: | 21 CFR 876.5360 |
| Device Class: | II |
| Panel: | 78, Gastroenterology and Urology |
| Classification (Product) Code: | QJN |
| Predicate Device: | Q191422/S001 |
#### Device Description
The ETHICON Linx Esophagus Sizing Tool (also referred to as LINX® Esophagus Sizing Tool, hereafter) is an accessory to the LINX Reflux Management System implant (packaged separately). The LINX Esophagus Sizing Tool is a single use disposable device that is provided sterile. The LINX Esophagus Sizing Tool is a laparoscopic instrument and has two ends – the handset, considered the proximal end and not intended for patient contact, and the shaft with protruding circular curved tip, considered the distal end and is intended for limited contact with the patient. The handset is designed with a thumbwheel for one-handed operation. When actuated, the thumbwheel advances and retracts the soft polymeric circular curved tip of the distal end. The handle has a numerical indicator which directly correlates with the number of beads for the range of sizes of the approved LINX implant device. The shaft and distal end of the circular curved tip each have a magnet which allows the user to create a loop and attach the magnets to each other. Once the magnets are attached, the user retracts slack from the soft distal end until the loop is in circumferential contact with the esophagus. The LINX Esophagus Sizing Tool is utilized at the time of implant to associate the esophagus size to a LINX implant device size to aid in guiding the user into choosing an appropriately sized LINX implant device.
# Indications for Use
The ETHICON Linx® Esophagus Sizing Tool for the LINX® Reflux Management System is a laparoscopic accessory used to estimate the appropriate size LINX® device.
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Technological Characteristics
The design and performance of the LINX Esophagus Sizing Tool is based on the currently marketed predicate device. The changes described in this submission do not affect the intended use of the device or alter the fundamental scientific technology of the device. The clinical, technical and biological parameters of the subject device are the same as the predicate. The technique used for determining the appropriate LINX implant device size remains unchanged between the subject and predicate designs. The subject and predicate devices are both manually powered and not powered by an outside energy source. Neither the subject device nor predicate device uses software. The modifications to the design were made to enhance comfortability and ease of use of the subject device.
The primary differences in the devices include design and operation of the handle and shaft stiffness. The 510(k)-subject device was designed for one-handed operation, while the predicate requires two hands. Control for extending and retracting the distal loop of the 510(k)-subject device is accomplished with the use of a thumbwheel; the predicate device requires the user to depress the end of the handle to extend the distal loop; retraction occurs by actuating a sidemounted lever. The sizing indicator on the handle of the 510(k)-subject device is different from the predicate - the subject device's numerical indicator displays 13-18, the predicate presents 11-18. The shaft of 510(k)-subject device is more rigid, or stiff, than the predicate. Other differences include some materials used in the construct of the devices. All materials used in the 510(k)-subject device are commonly used in medical devices.
# Performance Data
Performance data demonstrates that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device and any differences between the devices were found not to affect safety or performance. The following were performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate:
# Sterilization & Shelf Life
The 510(k)-subject device will be sterilized by Cobalt 60 irradiation. The device will be validated to achieve 10to sterility assurance level (SAL).
The LINX Esophagus Sizing Tool has a validated shelf life based on results of an accelerated aging stability study.
# Biocompatibility & Pyrogenicity
The biocompatibility of materials used in the LINX Esophagus Sizing Tool were evaluated based on ISO 10993-1:2018 - Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 1: Evaluation and Testing and on FDA guidance, Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" issued on June 16, 2016.
The 510(k)-subject materials evaluated were determined to be non-pyrogenic.
{5}------------------------------------------------
### Bench Testing
The following bench testing was performed to demonstrate that the ETHICON Linx Esophagus Sizing Tool performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use:
- Trocar compatibility, which includes shaft bending force characterization; ●
- Joint strength tensile testing;
- Distal loop extension/retraction force characterization;
- Material selection analysis, which includes corrosion and visual inspection;
- . Accuracy of the dimensional measurement;
- Minimize tissue damage;
- . Human factors & ease of use;
- Reliability testing. ●
# Animal Testing
No animal tests were performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate as it was deemed as not required.
#### Clinical Studies
This premarket notification does not rely on human clinical data to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
#### Conclusion
The results of the performance testing demonstrate that the LINX Esophagus Sizing Tool is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.