K200865 · Abaxis, Inc. · MZV · Oct 20, 2021 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K200865
Device Name
Piccolo Potassium Test System
Applicant
Abaxis, Inc.
Product Code
MZV · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Oct 20, 2021
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Dual Track
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1600
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Piccolo® Potassium Test, used with the Piccolo® blood chemistry analyzer or the Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzer, is intended to be used for the in vitro quantitative determination of potassium, in heparinized whole blood, heparinized plasma, or serum in a clinical laboratory setting or point-of-care location. The potassium assay is used for the quantitation of potassium in human heparinized whole blood, heparinized plasma, or serum. Potassium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of renal glomerular or tubular disease, adrenocortical insufficiency, diabetic ketoacidosis, excessive intravenous potassium therapy, sepsis, panhypopituitarism, in vitro hemolysis, hyperaldosteronism, malnutrition, hyperinsulinism, metabolic alkalosis and gastrointestinal loss.
Device Story
Piccolo® Potassium Test System is a single-use, disposable diagnostic system for quantitative potassium measurement in heparinized whole blood, plasma, or serum. Used with Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzer in clinical labs or point-of-care settings. Device separates whole blood into plasma and cells; meters plasma and diluent; mixes with reagent beads in disc cuvettes. Analyzer monitors chemical reactions photometrically. Results displayed on analyzer touchscreen; used by clinicians for diagnosis/treatment of electrolyte-related conditions. Benefits include rapid, point-of-care quantitative analysis.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated at POC sites using controls and plasma pools (n=75/sample) and whole blood (n=16/sample). Linearity validated across 1.2–9.5 mmol/L range using 19 levels. Method comparison performed at two POC sites (n=178 and n=130) against Siemens VISTA ISE reference method; Deming regression showed slopes 0.98–0.99 and R2 0.969–0.979. Reference interval study (n=126) validated 3.6–5.1 mmol/L for whole blood/serum and 3.3–4.6 mmol/L for plasma.
Technological Characteristics
Enzymatic colorimetric assay; photometric detection. Single-use disposable reagent disc. Sample volume ~100 µL. Reaction temperature 37°C. Factory-calibrated via barcode. Analyte range 1.5–8.5 mmol/L. Professional use only. Standalone analyzer (Piccolo Xpress®) with touchscreen interface and barcode scanner.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitation of potassium in human heparinized whole blood, heparinized plasma, or serum. Used in diagnosis and treatment of renal glomerular or tubular disease, adrenocortical insufficiency, diabetic ketoacidosis, excessive intravenous potassium therapy, sepsis, panhypopituitarism, in vitro hemolysis, hyperaldosteronism, malnutrition, hyperinsulinism, metabolic alkalosis, and gastrointestinal loss.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A potassium test system is a device intended to measure potassium in serum, plasma, and urine. Measurements obtained by this device are used to monitor electrolyte balance in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases conditions characterized by low or high blood potassium levels.
Predicate Devices
Piccolo® Potassium Test System (included on Piccolo MetLyte 7 Reagent Panel) (K992140)
Reference Devices
Siemens VISTA integrated system (VISTA ISE) K+ method (k051087)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K200865
B Applicant
Abaxis, Inc.
C Proprietary and Established Names
Piccolo® Potassium Test System
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MZV | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1600 - Potassium Test System | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
This submission is a Dual 510(k) and CLIA Waiver by Application (Dual Submission) tracked as k200865 and CW200007. This 510(k) is for a modification to the calibration of the Piccolo® Potassium Test (previously cleared device) run on the Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzer.
B Measurand:
Potassium
C Type of Test:
Quantitative, enzymatic colorimetric assay
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
K200865 - Page 2 of 9
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
### A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
### B Indication(s) for Use:
The Piccolo® Potassium Test, used with the Piccolo® blood chemistry analyzer or the Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzer, is intended to be used for the in vitro quantitative determination of potassium, in heparinized whole blood, heparinized plasma, or serum in a clinical laboratory setting or point-of-care location.
The potassium assay is used for the quantitation of potassium in human heparinized whole blood, heparinized plasma, or serum. Potassium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of renal glomerular or tubular disease, adrenocortical insufficiency, diabetic ketoacidosis, excessive intravenous potassium therapy, sepsis, panhypopituitarism, in vitro hemolysis, hyperaldosteronism, malnutrition, hyperinsulinism, metabolic alkalosis and gastrointestinal loss.
### C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
For clinical laboratory or point-of-care settings.
### D Special Instrument Requirements:
Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzer
## IV Device/System Characteristics:
### A Device Description:
The Piccolo® Potassium Test System is a single-use, disposable system used with the Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzer for the in vitro quantitative determination of potassium in lithium heparinized whole blood, lithium heparinized plasma, or serum in a clinical laboratory setting or point-of-care location. The Piccolo® Potassium Test System consists of the Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzer and the dry reagent for the detection of potassium which is contained in a single-use disposable reagent discs designed to separate a lithium heparinized whole blood sample into plasma and blood cells. The disc meters the required quantity of plasma and diluent, mixes the plasma with diluent, and delivers the mixture to the reaction cuvettes along the disc perimeter. The diluted plasma mixes with the lyophilized microsphere reagent beads contained in the cuvettes, initiating the chemical reactions that are then monitored by the analyzer. Alternatively, the disc may also be used with serum. The Piccolo® Potassium Test System dry reagent contains pyruvate kinase (0.01 U), lactate dehydrogenase (0.27 U), adenosine diphosphate (36 μg), phosphoenolpyruvate (57 μg) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (48 μg).
All performance studies for the Piccolo® Potassium Test System in this submission were conducted on the Piccolo Xpress® Chemistry Analyzer using the Piccolo® Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) disc. The potassium test included in the Piccolo® CMP disc is representative for the potassium assay found in all currently marketed Piccolo reagent discs that include the potassium assay.
{2}
K200865 - Page 3 of 9
B Principle of Operation:
The principle of operation of the Piccolo® Potassium Test is based on an enzymatic method with photometric detection. In the coupled-enzyme reaction, pyruvate kinase (PK) dephosphorylates phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) to form pyruvate. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) catalyzes conversion of pyruvate to lactate. Concomitantly, NADH is oxidized to NAD+. The rate of change in absorbance difference between 340 nm and 405 nm is due to the conversion of NADH to NAD+ and is directly proportional to the amount of potassium in the sample.
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
Piccolo® Metlyte 7 Reagent Disc - Potassium Test System
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K992140
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K200865 | K992140 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Piccolo® Potassium Test System | Piccolo® Metlyte 7 Reagent Disc - Potassium Test System |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | For the in vitro quantitative determination of potassium | Same |
| Principle of Operation/Methodology | Enzymatic colorimetric assay | Same |
| Sample Type | Lithium heparinized venous whole blood, lithium heparinized plasma, and serum | Same |
| Measuring Range | 1.5 – 8.5 mmol/L | Same |
| Sample Volume | Approximately 100 μL | Same |
{3}
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K200865 | K992140 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Piccolo® Potassium Test System | Piccolo® Metlyte 7 Reagent Disc - Potassium Test System |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Calibration | Bar code with factory calibrated lot specific data – modified calibration | Bar code with factory calibrated lot specific data – original calibration |
## VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
CLSI EP05-A3: Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline-Third Edition
CLSI EP06-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
CLSI EP17-A2: Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures- Second Edition
CLSI EP28-A3c: Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory-Third Edition
## VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### A Analytical Performance:
#### 1. Precision/Reproducibility:
**Precision**
Precision was evaluated at a point-of-care (POC) site using two levels of control (target values of 3.1 and 6.1 mmol/L) and two pooled plasma samples (approximate values of 3.2 and 5.4 mmol/L). The operators each tested these samples in five replicates on three Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzers over five days. One lot of CMP reagent discs was used. The total number of replicates was 75 per sample. The results are shown below:
| Sample | Mean mmol/L | Within Run | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Control 1 | 3.2 | 0.09 | 2.79 | 0.11 | 3.28 |
| Control 2 | 6.2 | 0.32 | 5.26 | 0.33 | 5.34 |
| Plasma Pool 1 | 3.2 | 0.07 | 2.31 | 0.09 | 2.89 |
| Plasma Pool 2 | 5.4 | 0.09 | 1.58 | 0.10 | 1.89 |
K200865 - Page 4 of 9
{4}
# Whole Blood Precision
Whole blood precision was tested at a POC site by two operators with one lot of CMP reagent discs using four fresh, lithium heparin venous whole blood samples on four Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzers with 16 replicates per sample. The study design for this precision study included repeatability, between-analyzer, and between-operator components. The design considered the one-hour limit for testing of potassium in whole blood samples on this device. The results are shown below:
| Sample | Mean mmol/L | Within Run | | Between Operator | | Between Analyzer | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Whole Blood 1 | 3.9 | 0.06 | 1.6 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 2.2 | 0.11 | 2.8 |
| Whole Blood 2 | 4 | 0.11 | 2.9 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.07 | 1.9 | 0.14 | 3.4 |
| Whole Blood 3 | 4 | 0.11 | 2.8 | 0.03 | 0.9 | 0.10 | 2.5 | 0.15 | 3.9 |
| Whole Blood 4 | 4 | 0.11 | 2.7 | 0.02 | 0.6 | 0.08 | 1.9 | 0.13 | 3.4 |
# 2. Linearity:
# Whole Blood
A linearity study was performed on three Piccolo Xpress® Chemistry Analyzers using one CMP reagent disc lot. To provide elevated concentrations of potassium in whole blood, individual lithium heparinized whole blood samples were enriched by the addition of a concentrated plasma with a concentration of $48.9\mathrm{mmol / L}$ potassium. A human, potassium free plasma pool was prepared by exhaustive dialysis against physiological saline containing lithium heparin. To provide low concentrations of potassium in whole blood, individual lithium heparinized whole blood samples were diluted with this potassium free plasma. Nineteen levels of potassium were prepared resulting in a panel with concentrations targeted at 1.2, 1.4, 1.9, 2.3, 3.0, 3.4, 3.9, 4.9, 5.6, 6.1, 6.9, 7.6, 7.8, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 9.1 and $9.5\mathrm{mmol / L}$ . Each sample was assayed in singleicate on three (3) Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzers to ensure that the recoveries were not instrument-specific (i.e., each sample was tested in triplicate). Samples were then processed to plasma and measured in triplicate by the Siemens VISTA integrated system (VISTA ISE) $\mathbf{K}+$ method (k051087) at a central reference laboratory. Expected values were calculated and then predicted values were calculated using a weighted least squares linear regression analysis and the average of the triplicate measurements. The deviation from linearity was within $\pm 0.5\mathrm{mmol / L}$ . In addition, an assessment of the systematic difference between the candidate device whole blood values and
K200865 - Page 5 of 9
{5}
the Siemens VISTA ISE plasma values by Deming regression was performed. Results of the regression analysis are presented below:
| Reportable Range mmol/L | Range Tested mmol/L | Slope | Intercept | R2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.5 – 8.5 | 1.2 to 8.5 | 0.985 (0.952 to 1.018) | 0.075 (-0.113 to 0.262) | 0.987 |
# Plasma
Immediately after the venous whole blood was tested as described above, it was centrifuged to obtain plasma. Each plasma sample was assayed in singlicate on three Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzers to ensure that the recoveries were not instrument-specific (i.e., each sample was tested in triplicate). The target concentrations of the samples were the same as in the whole blood linearity study. The plasma samples were also measured at a central reference laboratory by the Siemens VISTA integrated system (VISTA ISE) $\mathrm{K}^+$ method in triplicate. Expected values were calculated and then predicted values were calculated using a weighted least squares linear regression analysis and the average of the triplicate measurements. The deviation from linearity was within $0.5\mathrm{mmol / L}$ . In addition, an assessment of the systematic difference between the candidate device plasma values and the Siemens VISTA ISE plasma values by Deming regression was performed. Results of the regression analysis are presented below:
| Reportable Range mmol/L | Range Tested mmol/L | Slope | Intercept | R2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.5 – 8.5 | 1.2 to 8.5 | 0.972 (0.952 to 0.992) | 0.032 (-0.081 to 0.146) | 0.995 |
# Serum
A serum linearity study was performed using samples prepared by exhaustive dialysis against physiological saline. A serum concentrate was prepared by addition of KCl to a serum pool to provide a final concentration of $51.0\mathrm{mmol / L}$ . The potassium free serum pool was supplemented with this potassium concentrate to provide a high pool with a target value of $9.5\mathrm{mmol / L}$ . A low potassium pool was prepared in a similar manner to provide a pool with a target value of $1.2\mathrm{mmol / L}$ . Admixtures of this high potassium pool were made into the low pool to provide the following 14 levels of potassium, 1.2, 1.8, 2.4, 3.1, 3.6, 4.3, 4.9, 5.6, 6.3, 6.9, 7.6, 8.2, 8.8 and $9.5\mathrm{mmol / L}$ as determined at a central reference lab by the Siemens VISTA integrated system (VISTA ISE) $\mathbf{K}^+$ method, results run in triplicate. Each serum sample was assayed in singlicate on three (3) Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzers to ensure that the recoveries were not instrument-specific (i.e., each sample was tested in triplicate). Expected values were calculated and then predicted values were calculated using a weighted least squares linear regression analysis and the average of the triplicate measurements. The deviation from linearity was within $0.5\mathrm{mmol / L}$ . In addition, an assessment of the systematic difference between the candidate device serum values and the Siemens VISTA ISE serum values by Deming regression was performed. Results of the regression analysis are presented below:
K200865 - Page 6 of 9
{6}
| Reportable Range mmol/L | Range Tested mmol/L | Slope | Intercept | R2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.5 – 8.5 | 1.0 to 9.5 | 1.002
(0.914 to 1.091) | -0.128
(-0.577 to 0.321) | 0.995 |
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
The Analytical Specificity/Interference was established in K992140.
4. Assay Reportable Range:
1.5 – 8.5 mmol/L
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
Traceability
Every Potassium reagent bead set is calibrated against plasma samples with assigned values by the Siemens VISTA ISE K+ method and all three (3) levels of NIST SRM 956d.
Secondary standards and controls are tested on every lot of reagent discs during processing and final testing.
Sample Stability
Whole blood venipuncture sample stability was established in K992140. Whole blood venipuncture samples should be run within 60 minutes of collection.
6. Detection Limit:
The limit of quantitation (LoQ) of the Piccolo® Potassium Test System was evaluated on the Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzer using venous whole blood, plasma and serum prepared by taking a native blood sample of known potassium concentration and diluting it to four target concentrations using dialyzed (potassium free) serum/plasma as the diluent. The sponsor defines LoQ as the lowest measurable concentration (in mmol/L) that can be measured with respect to the predefined accuracy goal, in this case total error of +0.5 mmol/L. Each sample level was tested in replicates of five using two CMP reagent disc lots. Ten analyzers were used for whole blood testing, five per disc lot. Four analyzers were used for serum and plasma testing. Sixty low level sample replicates per lot were generated. The LoQ for whole blood, plasma, and serum on the Piccolo® Potassium Test System was determined to be 1.5 mmol/L.
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not Applicable
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
Method comparison studies were conducted at two point-of-care sites.
K200865 - Page 7 of 9
{7}
At the first site, one hundred and seventy-eight (178) venous whole blood samples were drawn into lithium heparinized tubes and immediately tested for potassium with the candidate device. Immediately after testing, the same tube was centrifuged to plasma by standard laboratory techniques and tested. A separate serum tube (SST) was also drawn, allowed to coagulate, and processed to serum then tested. Testing was performed by three intended operators using seven Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzers and one reagent lot of the Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) reagent disc. A total of 16 samples (9%) in the extreme high and low ranges were contrived to cover the entire measuring range. After testing with the candidate device, the plasma samples and serum samples were aliquoted, frozen, and shipped to a central reference laboratory for comparator testing by the Siemens VISTA integrated system (VISTA ISE) $\mathrm{K}^+$ method cleared by FDA in k051087. Data was analyzed using Deming regression. The average of the Siemens VISTA ISE potassium values was used as the x-axis and the individual candidate device values were used as the y-axis in the regression analysis.
| Sample type Candidate Method | Sample type Comparator Method | N | Slope | Intercept | R2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Heparinized venous whole blood | Heparinized plasma | 178 | 0.98 (0.921 to 1.047) | 0.12 | 0.969 |
| Heparinized plasma | Heparinized plasma | 178 | 0.98 (0.917 to 1.033) | 0.03 | 0.979 |
| Serum | Serum | 178 | 0.98 (0.923 to 1.036) | 0.06 | 0.979 |
The second site tested one hundred and thirty (130) venous whole blood samples drawn into lithium heparinized tubes and immediately tested for potassium using six Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzers and one reagent lot of the CMP reagent disc. Testing was performed by three intended use operators. A total of 13 samples (10%) in the extreme high and low range were contrived to cover the entire measuring range. After the initial testing, the whole blood was processed to plasma, frozen, and shipped to a central reference laboratory for duplicate testing by the Siemens VISTA integrated system (VISTA ISE) $\mathrm{K}^+$ method cleared by FDA in k051087. Data was analyzed using Deming regression. The average of the Siemens VISTA ISE potassium values was used as the x-axis and the individual candidate device values were used as the y-axis in the regression analysis.
| Sample type Waived Method | Sample type Comparator Method | N | Slope | Intercept | R2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Heparinized venous whole blood | Heparinized plasma | 130 | 0.99 (0.931 to 1.043) | 0.13 | 0.969 |
| Heparinized plasma | Heparinized plasma | 130 | 0.99 (0.923 to 1.043) | 0.03 | 0.979 |
| Serum | Serum | 130 | 0.99 (0.923 to 1.043) | 0.06 | 0.979 |
K200865 - Page 8 of 9
{8}
2. **Matrix Comparison:**
Not applicable. The sponsor provided performance data (refer to Sections VII A and B above) to support that the assay is suitable for use with lithium heparin whole blood, lithium heparin plasma and serum.
**C Clinical Studies:**
1. **Clinical Sensitivity:**
Not Applicable.
2. **Clinical Specificity:**
Not Applicable.
3. **Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):**
Not Applicable.
**D Clinical Cut-Off:**
Not Applicable.
**E Expected Values/Reference Range:**
A study was performed to validate the current reference interval, 3.6 – 5.1 mmol/L, using 126 results from subjects who self- reported as healthy between the ages of 18 and 70 years old and approximately 50% male and female. Venous whole blood samples were drawn into lithium heparinized tubes and immediately tested for potassium using one lot of the CMP reagent disc on eight Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzers. Immediately after testing, the same tube was centrifuged to plasma by standard laboratory techniques and tested on eight Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzers and one CMP reagent disc lot. A separate serum tube (SST) was also drawn, allowed to coagulate, and processed to serum then tested on eight Piccolo Xpress® chemistry analyzers and one CMP reagent disc lot. All testing was done in singlicate.
The reference range study data supports the labeled reference interval of 3.6 – 5.1 mmol/L for venous whole blood and serum. The reference interval for plasma was determined to be 3.3 – 4.6 mmol/L.
**VIII Proposed Labeling:**
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
**IX Conclusion:**
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K200865 - Page 9 of 9
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.