K200277 · Livongo Health, Inc. · NBW · Jun 4, 2020 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K200277
Device Name
Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000)
Applicant
Livongo Health, Inc.
Product Code
NBW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Jun 4, 2020
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000) is composed of the Livongo Blood Glucose Meter (BG1000) and Livongo Blood Glucose Test Strips (BG1000). The system is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the fingertips. The system is intended for self-testing by people with diabetes at home as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control programs. The Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000) is intended for single-patient use and should not be shared. The system is for in vitro diagnostic use and is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes, nor intended for use on neonates.
Device Story
Handheld, cellular-connected blood glucose meter; uses amperometric electrochemical test strips to measure glucose in capillary whole blood from fingertips. User applies blood to strip; meter displays glucose level (40-600 mg/dL) on touch-panel screen; stores data in memory; transmits data via cellular network to secure server. Used by patients with diabetes in home settings for self-monitoring. Features include logs, graphs, and averages. Hardware includes camera, microphone, 3-axis accelerometer, and vibrator motor (hardware support only). Output aids patients in diabetes management and treatment decisions.
Clinical Evidence
Lay user evaluation study (n=383) compared capillary blood glucose results against YSI 2300 laboratory comparator. Results showed 99.7% of samples within ±15% and 100% within ±20% of comparator across the measuring range. Extreme glucose value study (n=139) confirmed performance at <80 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL. Bench testing validated linearity, precision (CV 2.2-3.3%), hematocrit interference (10-70%), altitude (up to 10,000 ft), and sample volume (0.6 μL).
Technological Characteristics
Amperometric glucose measurement using FAD-GDH enzyme. Measurement range 40-600 mg/dL. Handheld form factor with touchscreen interface. Connectivity via cellular network. Powered by AC adapter/USB. Disinfection validated for 260 cycles using PDI Super Sani-Cloth. Compliant with electrical safety and EMC standards.
Indications for Use
Indicated for self-testing by people with diabetes at home to monitor glucose levels in fresh capillary whole blood from fingertips as an aid in diabetes control programs. Not for diagnosis or screening of diabetes; not for use on neonates.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
On Call Sure Blood Glucose Monitoring System (K181527)
On Call Sure Sync Blood Glucose Monitoring System (K181527)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K200277
B Applicant
Livongo Health, Inc.
C Proprietary and Established Names
Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000)
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NBW | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1345 - Glucose Test System | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
New device
B Measurand:
Capillary whole blood glucose
C Type of Test:
Quantitative, Amperometric, Glucose Dehydrogenase (FAD-GDH)
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
K200277 - Page 2 of 11
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
B Indication(s) for Use:
The Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000) is composed of the Livongo Blood Glucose Meter (BG1000) and Livongo Blood Glucose Test Strips (BG1000).
The system is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the fingertips. The system is intended for self-testing by people with diabetes at home as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control programs. The Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000) is intended for single-patient use and should not be shared.
The system is for in vitro diagnostic use and is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes, nor intended for use on neonates.
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
- OTC - Over The Counter
- For In Vitro Diagnostic Use
- The Livongo meter should not be used to test critically ill patients.
- The Livongo meter should not be used to test neonates.
- The Livongo meter has not been evaluated for alternative Site Testing (AST). Only use blood from the fingertip.
- The Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000) is only for self-testing and single patient use.
- Very high (above 70%) and very low (below 10%) hematocrit levels can cause false results. Talk to your doctor to find out your hematocrit level.
- The Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000) has not been tested to work properly above 10,000 ft (3,048 meters).
- Blood samples from patients in shock, severe dehydration or a hyperosmolar state (with or without ketosis) have not been tested. It's not recommended to test those samples with the Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000).
- This device is not intended for use in healthcare or assisted-use settings such as hospitals, physician offices, or long-term care facilities because it has not been cleared by FDA for use in these settings, including for routine assisted testing or as part of glycemic control procedures.
- Use of this device on multiple patients may lead to transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Hepatitis B Virsu (HBV), or other bloodborne pathogens.
- The Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000) is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes.
{2}
K200277 - Page 3 of 11
# D Special Instrument Requirements:
Livongo Blood Glucose Meter (BG1000)
# IV Device/System Characteristics:
# A Device Description:
The Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000) consists of the following:
- Livongo Blood Glucose Meter (BG1000)
- Livongo Blood Glucose Test Strips (BG1000)
- Livongo Lancing Device
- Livongo Lancets
- Livongo Blood Glucose Control Solution Level 1 (sold separately) and Level 2
- AC Adapter and USB Charger Set
- Carrying Case
- Instructions for use
The Livongo Blood Glucose Meter (BG1000) is a handheld device that incorporates features to aid in self-monitoring of blood glucose including tables, logs, and graphs. The blood glucose results are displayed on the screen and stored in the meter's memory, and may also be transmitted over a cellular network to a secure server.
The Livongo Blood Glucose Test Strips (BG1000) were previously cleared under k181527.
# B Principle of Operation:
The Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000) measures glucose amperometrically, and includes enzyme glucose dehydrogenase (FAD-GDH) and a redox mediator that electrochemically reacts with glucose in the sample to produce an electrical current. The current is proportional the glucose concentration.
# C Instrument Description Information:
| Modes of Operation | Yes | No |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device? | ☑ | ☐ |
| Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission? | ☑ | ☐ |
| Software | | |
| FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types. | ☑ | ☐ |
{3}
K200277 - Page 4 of 11
1. **Instrument Name:**
Livongo Blood Glucose Meter (BG1000)
2. **Specimen Identification:**
There is no specimen identification function with this device. A capillary specimen is applied directly from the fingertip to the test strip.
3. **Specimen Sampling and Handling:**
There are no specific specimen sampling or handling considerations. Capillary blood as collected from the fingertip is applied directly to the test strip.
4. **Calibration:**
No user calibration is required.
5. **Quality Control:**
Livongo Glucose Control Solutions are used to confirm that the meter and test strips are working properly. Glucose control solutions are aqueous control solutions that contain known concentrations of glucose. Two levels are available (Level 1 and Level 2) for use with the systems. Level 2 is provided with the kit. Level 1 is sold separately. Instructions on how to order the control solutions and when to conduct control solution testing are included in the user manual. The meter will automatically detect the control solution and mark the test separately from blood glucose test results. An acceptable range for each control level is printed on the test strip vial label.
V **Substantial Equivalence Information:**
A **Predicate Device Name(s):**
On Call Sure Blood Glucose Monitoring System, On Call Sure Sync Blood Glucose Monitoring System
B **Predicate 510(k) Number(s):**
K181527
C **Comparison with Predicate(s):**
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | k200277 | k181527 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000) | On Call Sure Blood Glucose Monitoring System; On Call Sure Sync Blood Glucose Monitoring System |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | Quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertip as an aid in monitoring the | Same |
{4}
K200277 - Page 5 of 11
| | effectiveness of the diabetes control program. | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Measurement range | 40-600 mg/dL | Same |
| Enzyme | Glucose Dehydrogenase (FAD-GDH) | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Patient sampling site | Fingertip only | Fingertip, forearm, and palm |
| Meter interface | Touch screen | Monochrome display and push buttons |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Test Systems for Over-the-Counter Use, Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. October 11, 2016.
CLSI EP06-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach.
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Repeatability (within-run precision):
The sponsor performed a repeatability (within-run) precision study using venous whole blood samples adjusted to six different glucose concentrations (30-50, 51-110, 111-150, 151-250, 251-400, and 401-600 mg/dL). Each of the six samples was analyzed in replicates of 10 with three test strips lots and 10 meters for a total of 300 test results per glucose level. The results are summarized in the table below:
| Glucose level | Average | SD | %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 45.8 | 1.49 | 3.3% |
| 2 | 78.2 | 2.33 | 3.0% |
| 3 | 126.3 | 3.37 | 2.7% |
| 4 | 192.9 | 5.13 | 2.7% |
| 5 | 337.6 | 8.30 | 2.5% |
| 6 | 491.7 | 12.37 | 2.5% |
Intermediate Precision:
Intermediate (day to day) precision was performed using six levels of glucose control solution samples with target glucose concentrations of 40, 80, 130, 200, 325, and 500 mg/dL. Each of the six samples was tested in one run per day for 10 days using three test strip lots and 10 meters, with 1 replicate per meter for a total of 300 test results per glucose level. The results are summarized below:
{5}
| Glucose level | Average | SD | %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 46.3 | 1.41 | 3.0% |
| 2 | 89.1 | 2.30 | 2.6% |
| 3 | 141.5 | 4.08 | 2.9% |
| 4 | 229.3 | 5.37 | 2.3% |
| 5 | 359.2 | 7.88 | 2.2% |
| 6 | 546.4 | 12.15 | 2.2% |
# 2. Linearity:
Linearity was evaluated using venous whole blood samples adjusted to 10 concentrations spanning the measurement range with glucose concentrations of 25, 50, 80, 110, 170, 220, 330, 450, 550, and $650\mathrm{mg / dL}$ as measured by the comparator method, YSI 2300. Each sample was tested with 10 meters in replicates of 10 per meter using 3 test strip lots for a total of 100 results per sample and test strip lot. The linear regression results are presented below:
| Strip Lot | Slope | Intercept | R2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 0.988 | 2.1 | 0.9968 |
| 2 | 0.980 | 0.5 | 0.9984 |
| 3 | 0.976 | 3.3 | 0.9974 |
The results of the linearity study support the claimed glucose measurement range of 40-600 mg/dL.
If a sample has glucose less than $40\mathrm{mg / dL}$ an error message is displayed by the meter which reads: Severely Low: $< 40~\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . If a sample has glucose greater than $600~\mathrm{mg / dL}$ an error message is displayed by the meter which reads: Severely High: $>600~\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . These error messages were validated using blood glucose samples outside the measuring range of the device to demonstrated that the error messages functioned as intended.
# 3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
The information to support the analytical specificity performance was provided and found to be acceptable.
The following statements are listed in the product labeling.
- If you are taking a high dose of vitamin C (blood concentration $>3\mathrm{mg/dL}$ ), the result from your meter may not be correct.
- Do not use during or soon after xylose absorption testing since xylose may cause inaccurate glucose results. Ask your doctor how long to wait before performing a glucose test.
K200277 - Page 6 of 11
{6}
4. Assay Reportable Range:
The assay reportable range is 40-600 mg/dL.
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
Traceability:
The system reports plasma-equivalent glucose values, and is calibrated by using the YSI 2300 STAT PLUS Glucose Analyzer, which is traceable the NIST SRM 917b glucose reference material.
Test Strip Stability:
For the test strips, the labeling indicates a shelf life of 24 months and an open vial stability of 6 months when stored at the recommended storage conditions of 36°F-95°F (2-35°C) and 10-90% relative humidity. Protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable to support the labeled shelf life and open vial stability claims.
6. Detection Limit:
The lower limit of the reportable range is based on the linearity study above (section A2).
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
8. Accuracy (Instrument):
Not applicable.
9. Carry-Over:
Not applicable.
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
See lay user study below in section VII.C3.
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable. The device is only intended for use with fresh capillary whole blood from a fingerstick.
C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
K200277 - Page 7 of 11
{7}
K200277 - Page 8 of 11
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable.
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Method Comparison/Lay User Evaluation study
To assess the performance of Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000) in the hands of the intended users, the sponsor conducted a user evaluation study consisting of 383 lay user participants who collected capillary samples from their fingertip and independently self-tested following only the product labeling in English. Greater than 10% of the participants were identified by questionnaire as a naïve users; i.e. not previously used any self-monitoring blood glucose system. Three test strip lots were used in the study. The results were analyzed by comparing the capillary blood glucose value obtained by the lay user with their system against a plasma glucose value measured in duplicate with a laboratory-based comparator method (YSI Model 2300 STAT PLUS Glucose Analyzer). The glucose concentrations across all samples ranged from 54 to 579 mg/dL, which includes 20 native samples < 80 mg/dL and 50 samples > 250 mg/dL as measured by the comparator method. The results were analyzed for differences with the comparator, and by regression analysis, and are summarized below:
Glucose concentration < 75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 10/14 (71.4%) | 14/14 (100.0%) | 14/14 (100.0%) |
Glucose concentration ≥ 75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% | Within ± 20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 219/369 (59.3%) | 331/369 (89.7%) | 368/369 (99.7%) | 369/369 (100.0%) |
Combined glucose concentrations across the measuring range:
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% | Within ± 20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 226/383 (59.0%) | 343/383 (89.6%) | 382/383 (99.7%) | 383/383 (100.0%) |
Results of linear regression analysis:
| Slope | Intercept | R² |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1.021 | -2.6 | 0.983 |
Usability:
At the end of the study, each participant was asked to complete a usability questionnaire regarding ease of understanding of information in the user manual and the ease of use when performing a blood glucose test. From the sponsor's analysis of the questionnaire responses, the participants overall were satisfied with the ease of operation by following the instructions for use in the User's Manual and the overall performance of the Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System.
{8}
K200277 - Page 9 of 11
Readability:
A Flesch-Kincaid readability assessment was conducted, and the results demonstrated that the Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000) instructions for use are written for a reading level lower than 8th grade.
Extreme Glucose Values Study
A study was conducted to assess the performance of the device at the extremes of the measurement range. Patient samples were either glycolyzed or spiked with glucose, to achieve 73 capillary blood samples with glucose concentrations <80 mg/dL, and 66 capillary blood samples with glucose to concentrations >250 mg/dL. Results obtained on the candidate device were compared to those obtained on the comparator method, YSI 2300, and is summarized in the tables below:
Glucose concentration < 80 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 56 / 73 (76.7%) | 73 / 73 (100.0%) | 73 / 73 (100.0%) |
Glucose concentration > 250 mg/dL
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% | Within ± 20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 47 / 66 (71.2%) | 65 / 66 (98.5%) | 66 / 66 (100.0%) | 66 / 66 (100.0%) |
D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
E Expected Values/Reference Range:
The sponsor includes the following expected glucose values in their labeling:
| Time | Range, mg/dL |
| --- | --- |
| Fasting and Before Meals | 70 – 100 |
| 2 Hours After Meal | Less than 140 |
From: American Diabetes Association (Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2018. Diabetes Care, January 2018, vol. 41, Supplement 1, S13-S27).
F Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data:
1. Hematocrit Study
To evaluate the effect of hematocrit on the Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000), venous blood samples were adjusted to hematocrit levels of 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65% and 70%. Each hematocrit level was tested at six glucose concentration levels (~40, ~80, ~130, ~200, ~325, and ~500 mg/dL). Each sample was tested in replicates of ten using 30 meters on each of three test strip lots for a total of 90 measurements per sample. Results were compared to results obtained using a laboratory-based comparator measurement (YSI 2300 STAT PLUS analyzer). The evaluation
{9}
of bias and percent bias relative to values obtained on the YSI 2300 STAT PLUS analyzer support that hematocrit concentrations of 10-70% do not impact test results.
2. Altitude Study
Information to support the claimed performance of the device at elevations up to 10,000 ft (3,048 m) was reviewed and found to be acceptable.
3. Sample Volume Study
A study was conducted to verify the minimum sample volume requirement for the test strip. Venous whole blood samples at three glucose levels (50-65, 100-120, and 200-250 mg/dL) were tested at five sample volumes (0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, and 0.8 μL) using three test strip lots. Glucose results obtained with the candidate device were compared to values obtained using the comparator method (YSI 2300 STAT PLUS analyzer). The results of the study support the claimed minimum sample volume of 0.6 μL. The results also demonstrated that with blood volumes below 0.6 μL, an error message of insufficient sample volume functioned as intended.
4. Operating Conditions Study
The effect of combined operating temperature and relative humidity conditions on the Livongo Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000) was evaluated using venous whole blood samples prepared at six glucose concentration levels (45.2, 103.0, 130.7, 202.4, 327.0, and 526.6 mg/dL). Test strips from 3 lots were exposed to one of 7 relative humidity (RH) and temperature conditions (10% RH/5°C, 10% RH/21°C, 10% RH/45°C, 90% RH/5°C, 90% RH/21°C, 90% RH/45°C, or 45% RH/21°C). The glucose results from the candidate device were compared to results obtained using the comparator method, YSI 2300 STAT PLUS, and support the claimed operating conditions of 10-90% RH and 41-113F (5-45°C).
5. Electrical Safety and EMC testing
The sponsor provided documentation certifying that acceptable electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing had been performed, and the system was found to be compliant.
6. Infection Control Studies
The Livongo Glucose Monitoring System (BG1000) is intended for single-patient use only. Disinfection efficacy studies were performed on the meter materials by an outside commercial laboratory, demonstrating complete inactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) with the chosen disinfectant: PDI Super Sani-Cloth Germicidal Disposable Wipe (EPA Registration number: 9480-4). Robustness studies were also performed by the sponsor using the Livongo Glucose Monitoring System demonstrating that there was no change in the performance of the system or in the external materials of the meter after 260 cycles of cleaning and disinfection using the chosen disinfectant. The robustness studies were designed to simulate cleaning and disinfecting over the five year single-patient use life of the meter. Labeling was reviewed for adequate instructions for the validated cleaning and disinfection procedures.
7. Flex Studies
Drop testing, vibration testing, intermittent sampling, sample perturbation, and testing with used test strips were completed. The testing performed demonstrated that the device is robust
K200277 - Page 10 of 11
{10}
to these common use scenarios, and that the appropriate error messages are returned to the user if one of the situations has occurred.
## VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
## IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K200277 - Page 11 of 11
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.