Disposable EEG Electrodes (MODEL: DL, E-CAP, FLEX-CAP) is intended for use in routine clinical settings where rapid placement of a number of EEG electrodes is desired.
Device Story
Disposable EEG electrodes (models DL, E-CAP, FLEX-CAP) facilitate rapid, uniform placement of 2-128 electrodes on patient scalp; used in routine clinical settings by neurologists. E-CAP/FLEX-CAP are spandex caps with electrodes in silicone bases; DL is a standalone electrode. Electrodes capture brain electrical activity, transferring signals via electrolyte to EEG recording equipment. Device supports International 10-20 and 10-10 positioning systems. Output is raw electrophysiological signal for clinical evaluation; aids diagnosis by enabling consistent, multi-channel EEG monitoring. Benefits include reduced setup time and consistent electrode positioning.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Performance validated against AAMI/ANSI ES60601-1 and ANSI EC12-2000 standards. Biocompatibility confirmed via ISO 10993-1, 10993-5, and 10993-10.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Spandex (cap), silicone (mount base), Ag/AgCl-plated ABS or Ag/AgCl ink on PET (electrodes). Connectivity: Wired connection to EEG equipment via adapter cables/connectors. Dimensions: 26-66 cm cap sizes; 0.1-3.0 m cable length. Standards: AAMI/ANSI ES60601-1, ISO 10993, ASTM EC12. Sensing: Passive cutaneous electrode for signal transmission. No active energy source.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use in routine clinical settings for rapid placement of EEG electrodes in adults and children to transmit electrophysiological signals to data collection devices.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A cutaneous electrode is an electrode that is applied directly to a patient's skin either to record physiological signals (e.g., the electroencephalogram) or to apply electrical stimulation.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
April 21, 2020
Wuhan Greentek Pty Ltd. Yarong Liu Rm 03-2, Floor 3, Dingye Bldg, Phase III International Enterprise Center, Special No.1 Guanggu Ave Donghu New Technology Development Zone Wuhan, Hubei, 430074 China
Re: K200162
Trade/Device Name: Disposable EEG Electrodes (MODEL: DL, E-CAP, FLEX-CAP) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.1320 Regulation Name: Cutaneous Electrode Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GXY Dated: January 1, 2020 Received: January 22, 2020
Dear Yarong Liu:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
For Vivek Pinto, PhD Director DHT5B: Division of Neuromodulation and Physical Medicine Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K200162
Device Name
Disposable EEG Electrodes (MODEL: DL, E-CAP, FLEX-CAP)
Indications for Use (Describe)
Disposable EEG Electrodes (MODEL: DL, E-CAP, FLEX-CAP) is intended for use in routine clinical settings where rapid placement of a number of EEG electrodes is desired.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(K) Summary
Prepared in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR Part 807.92
#### Prepared Date: March 8, 2020
# 1. Submitter's Information
The submitter of this pre-market notification is:
| Name: | Wuhan Greentek Pty Ltd |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Address: | Room 03-2, Floor 3, Dingye Building, Phase III, International<br>Enterprise Center, Special No.1, Guanggu Avenue, Donghu New<br>Technology Development Zone, Wuhan, CHINA 430074 |
| Contact person: | Yarong Liu |
| Title: | Manager |
| E-mail: | lyr@gtsensor.com |
| Tel: | +86-27-88185488 |
#### 2. Device Identification
| | Trade/Device Name: | Disposable EEG Electrodes (MODEL: DL, E-CAP, FLEX-CAP) |
|--------------------|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Models: | DL, E-CAP, FLEX-CAP | |
| Common Name | Disposable EEG Electrodes system | |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 882.1320 | |
| Regulation Name: | cutaneous electrode | |
| Regulation Class: | Class II | |
| Product Code: | GXY | |
## 3. Predicate Device
| 510(K) number: | K112319 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------|
| Trade Name: | Electro-Cap System |
| Common Name | EEG electrode positioning system |
| Manufacturer: | Electro-Cap International, Inc. |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 882.1320 |
| Regulation Name: | cutaneous electrode |
| Regulation Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | GXY |
## 4. Device Description
Disposable EEG Electrodes includes three models: DL, E-CAP, FLEX-CAP.
{4}------------------------------------------------
The models E-CAP and FLEX-CAP are EEG electrode positioning systems used to place a number of EEG electrodes in a uniform and consistent manner on the head in order to transmit electrophysiological signals from an individual to data collection devices. The model E-CAP is made from spandex type material with silver/silver chloride-plated ABS electrodes in silicone base attached to the cap. The model FLEX-CAP is made from spandex type material with silver/silver chloride ink printed electrodes on PET in silicone base attached to the cap, the cap covering the entire scalp and is held in place with chin straps. The spandex type material holds the electrodes securely in position during an EEG recording. The electrodes on the caps connect to the EEG equipment either through an adapter cable or in some instances, special connector on match EEG equipment. The electrical activity of the brain is transferred via the electrolyte to the electrode and then to the EEG equipment for evaluation. The models E-CAP and FLEX-CAP have been built with the placement of 2-128 electrodes, the size of cap is from 26 to 66 cm.
The model DL is a silver/silver chloride-plated ABS electrode with shrink tubing and connector, which is used on the model E-CAP. In addition, model DL can be used alone on the scalp for EEG monitoring.
The electrodes on the Disposable EEG Electrodes (MODEL: DL, E-CAP, FLEX-CAP) are positioned according to the International Ten-Twenty System (10-20) of Electrode Placement. In addition, Disposable EEG Electrodes (MODEL: DL, E-CAP, FLEX-CAP) with as a few as 2 or as many as 128 electrodes, have been mounted in a place according to the 10-10 American Electroencephalographic Society positioning system. Disposable EEG Electrodes (MODEL: DL, FLEX-CAP) can also be custom-made, in which the numbers of electrodes and placement of electrodes are made under an instruction from customs.
## 5. Indication for use
Disposable EEG Electrodes (MODEL: DL, E-CAP, FLEX-CAP) is intended for use in routine clinical settings where rapid placement of a number of EEG electrodes is desired.
## 6. Comparison to Predicate Device
Compared to the predicate devices, the subject device has same intended use, similar product design, and same performance effectiveness as the predicate device as summarized in the following table.
| Feature | Subject device | Predicate device | Discussion |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| 510(k)<br>Number | - | K112319 | - |
| Indication<br>for Use | Disposable EEG<br>Electrodes (MODEL:<br>DL, E-CAP, FLEX-<br>CAP) is intended for<br>use in routine clinical<br>settings where rapid<br>placement of a number<br>of EEG electrodes is<br>desired. | The Electro-Cap is<br>intended for use in routine<br>clinical settings where<br>rapid placement of a<br>number of EEG electrodes<br>is desired. | Same |
| Classifica<br>tion | Class II per<br>21CFR882.1320, | Class II per<br>21CFR882.1320, | Same |
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Regulatio<br>n | cutaneous electrode | cutaneous electrode | |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Product<br>Code | GXY, Electrode,<br>cutaneous | GXY, Electrode,<br>cutaneous | Same |
| Environm<br>ent of<br>use | Electrophysiological | Electrophysiological | Same |
| Intended<br>user | Neurologists | Neurologists | Same |
| Target<br>patient | Adults and Children | Adults and Children | Same |
| Where<br>used | On the head | On the head | Same |
| Number<br>of<br>contacts | 2-128 | 2-256 | The placement of the<br>electrodes is according to the<br>International (10-20) System of<br>Electrode Placement or (10-<br>10) American<br>Electroencephalographic<br>Society positioning system.<br>The number of the electrodes<br>in use is according to the<br>needs of clinic practice. By<br>using 19 electrodes and 32<br>electrodes (or 19 channels and<br>32 channels can meet majority<br>needs, while using channels<br>up to 128 can satisfy most<br>medical applications as the<br>predicate K112319 does. The<br>disposable electrodes can<br>adapt to most EEG equipment<br>as the predicate K112319<br>does. Both of the subject<br>device and the predicate<br>device are applied to record<br>EEG signals on patients' scalp,<br>and the bioelectrical signals<br>are in microvolts-level. The<br>electrodes only transfer tiny<br>bioelectrical signals to the<br>EEG recording equipment. The<br>doctors can read the signals<br>according the channels<br>assigned, such as 19 channels<br>or 32 channels. The safety<br>issue only concerns the bio- |
| | | | compatibility of the electrode<br>materials, while the<br>effectiveness mainly concerns<br>the electrode surface<br>materials. The number of<br>electrodes in the products is<br>irrelevant to the safety and<br>also doesn't affect the<br>effectiveness compared to<br>predicate devices. Therefore,<br>the difference in numbers of<br>electrodes does not raise any<br>new safety risk or<br>effectiveness issue. |
| Size of<br>Caps | Various - babies to<br>large 26cm to 66cm | Various - babies to large<br>26cm to 66cm | Same |
| Style of<br>Caps | Full head cap | Full head cap | Same |
| Ear Slits | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Cap<br>material | Spandex | Spandex | Same |
| Electrode<br>Mounts | Silicone | Polyethylene | The mount base used in the<br>Disposable Electrodes is<br>designed for fastening the<br>electrodes on the cap fabric,<br>and the base don't involve in<br>the bioelectrical signal<br>recording. Silicone is a<br>common material used in<br>medical device. The silicone<br>mount base can be made soft<br>than the base made by<br>polyethylene in the predicate<br>device. Therefore, by using<br>silicone materials as the mount<br>base offers more comfortable<br>experience to the users.<br>Furthermore, the silicone<br>mount bases used in this<br>Disposable Electrodes have<br>passed the bio-compatibility<br>test. Thus, the use of silicone<br>as electrode mount base does<br>not raise new safety and<br>effectiveness issues. |
| Cable<br>Length | 0.1 m - 3.0 m | Various - 3 to 5 feet | The length of the cable in the<br>Disposable electrodes is<br>different from the predicate<br>device but it doesn't raise new<br>safety and effectiveness issue.<br>Because the cable is used for<br>transferring EEG signals (the<br>tiny bioelectrical signal in ~<br>several ten microvolts peak to<br>peak) from the patients' scalp<br>to the data record devices. The<br>cable is designed in<br>conformance with AAMI / ANSI<br>ES60601-1:2005/(R)2012 and<br>A1:2012, C1:2009/(R)2012<br>and A2:2010/(R)2012<br>(consolidated text) Medical<br>electrical equipment - Part 1:<br>General requirements for basic<br>safety and essential<br>performance (IEC 60601-<br>1:2005, mod). |
| Type of<br>Cables | Standard ribbon cable<br>and lead wires | Standard ribbon cable and<br>lead wires | Same |
| Electrode<br>Metal | 1. FLEX-CAP:<br>silver/silver chloride ink<br>printed electrodes on<br>PET (Polyethylene<br>terephthalate)<br>2. DL and E-CAP:<br>silver/silver chloride –<br>plated ABS base | Pure tin, silver, silver/silver<br>chloride, gold plated | Electrode material need to<br>have good electrical<br>conducting and non-polarized<br>characteristic on the surface<br>(low interface impedance). The<br>predicate device has four<br>electrode materials, but the<br>best electrode material is<br>silver/silver chloride as it<br>possesses non-polarized<br>surface. The surface material<br>of disposable electrodes is<br>silver/silver chlorides, which is<br>printed or plated on plastic<br>(PET, Polyethylene<br>terephthalate or ABS). The<br>plastic provides a supporting<br>substrate, the surface<br>silver/silver chloride provide<br>electrode function as electrical<br>conducting and low impedance<br>as the one of the best<br>electrodes in the predicate<br>devices. These plastics don't |
{6}------------------------------------------------
{7}------------------------------------------------
{8}------------------------------------------------
| Type of<br>Connecto<br>rs | Touch-proof safety<br>socket DIN42-802<br>( $ Φ $ =1.5mm) | D-Sub connectors, touch<br>proof DIN sockets and<br>special connectors on<br>match EEG equipment<br>and computers | contact to scalp and don't<br>involve in bioelectrical signal<br>recording either.<br>Further, the electrodes with<br>silver/silver chloride ink printed<br>on PET substrate and<br>silver/silver chloride plated on<br>ABS substrate have passed<br>bio-compatibility tests in<br>accordance with ISO 10993-1<br>and as well as performance<br>test in accordance with ASTM<br>EC 12. The test result shows<br>that subject device meets the<br>performance requirements of<br>FDA guidance, so the<br>difference in materials does<br>not raise new safety and<br>effectiveness issues. |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Biocomp<br>atibility<br>test | ISO 10993-1,<br>ISO 10993-5,<br>ISO 10993-10 | None was conducted | The subject device has been<br>performed biocompatibility test<br>according to the FDA<br>guidance, this difference does<br>not raise any new safety or<br>effectiveness. |
| Performa<br>nce<br>requirem<br>ents | 1. Resistance <100 Ω<br>2. AC impedance <2<br>kΩ (at 10 Hz)<br>3. DC offset voltage<br><100 mV<br>4. Combined offset<br>instability and internal<br>noise: <150 µV<br>5. Bias current<br>tolerance <100 mV | Needs to transmit<br>electrophysiological<br>signals from an individual<br>to data collection devices<br>with a maximum<br>impedance of 5 K/Ohms.<br>Does not transmit<br>electrical current, nor are<br>they intended to be used<br>for stimulation. | The subject device was<br>performed electrode<br>characterization test according<br>to the FDA guidance, the<br>performance of subject device<br>met the requirements of FDA<br>guidance "Cutaneous<br>Electrodes for Recording<br>Purposes - Performance<br>Criteria for Safety and<br>Performance Based Pathway".<br>we have done more details in<br>tests according to the FDA<br>guidance. |
All the differences do not affect the safety and effectiveness of the subject device which is concluded after all the required testing, so there are no safety and effectiveness issues relating to the subject system.
{9}------------------------------------------------
# 7. Performance Data
#### Clinical test:
Clinical testing is not required.
#### Non-clinical data
Performance:
We performed electrical safety. The design of the Disposable EEG Electrodes (MODEL: DL, E-CAP, FLEX-CAP) is in conformance with subclause 8.5.2.3 of AAMI / ANSI ES60601-1:2005/(R)2012 and A1:2012, C1:2009/(R)2012 and A2:2010/(R)2012 (consolidated text) Medical electrical equipment -Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance (IEC 60601-1:2005, mod). We carried out the performance test and shelf life validation according to the <Cutaneous Electrodes for Recording Purposes - Performance Criteria for Safety and Performance Based Pathway: Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff> and ANSI EC12-2000 Disposable ECG electrodes.
Biocompatibility:
- 1. ISO 10993-1 Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
- 2. ISO 10993-5 Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity
- 3. ISO 10993-10 Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization
## 8. Conclusion
Based on the comparison with predicate device, our Disposable EEG Electrodes (MODEL: DL, E-CAP, FLEX-CAP) has the same intended use, structure, and technologies, which is substantially equivalent to predicated device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.