ClearCalc is intended to assist radiation treatment planners in determining if their treatment planning calculations are accurate using an independent Monitor Unit (MU) and dose calculation algorithm.
Device Story
ClearCalc is a software-based tool for radiation oncology; it independently validates Monitor Unit (MU) and dose calculations generated by primary Treatment Planning Systems (TPS). Input data includes CT images, structure sets, and treatment plan parameters (e.g., field geometry, source positions, dwell times) obtained via TPS APIs or files. The device uses a Finite-Size Pencil Beam (FSPB) algorithm for photon calculations, sector integration for electron cutouts, and AAPM TG-43 protocols for brachytherapy. It outputs calculated MU/dose values and difference metrics in a tabular format for comparison against TPS results. Used in clinical settings by trained radiation oncology personnel, the device assists in verifying treatment plan accuracy, potentially improving patient safety by identifying calculation errors. It operates on the Windows OS.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Verification tests were performed using pass/fail criteria to ensure software functionality and accuracy of MU/dose calculations.
Technological Characteristics
Standalone software for Windows OS. Performs independent MU and dose calculations for external beam and brachytherapy. Photon calculation: Finite-Size Pencil Beam (FSPB) algorithm with 3D patient geometry for heterogeneity corrections. Electron calculation: sector integration method for cutout factors. Brachytherapy: AAPM TG-43 protocol. Connectivity via TPS APIs or file import.
Indications for Use
Indicated for radiation treatment planners to validate treatment planning calculations for patients undergoing external beam radiation therapy or brachytherapy.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical charged-particle radiation therapy system is a device that produces by acceleration high energy charged particles (e.g., electrons and protons) intended for use in radiation therapy. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, treatment planning computer programs, component parts, and accessories.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is in blue and includes the letters "FDA" followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION".
Radformation, Inc. % Mr. Kurt Sysock Co-founder/CEO 335 Madison Avenue, 16th Floor NEW YORK NY 10017
April 9, 2020
Re: K193640
Trade/Device Name: ClearCalc Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.5050 Regulation Name: Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MUJ Dated: March 9, 2020 Received: March 9, 2020
Dear Mr. Sysock:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmp/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see
{1}------------------------------------------------
https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
For
Thalia T. Mills, Ph.D. Director Division of Radiological Health OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K193640
Device Name
ClearCalc
Indications for Use (Describe)
ClearCalc is intended to assist radiation treatment planners in determining if their treatment planning calculations are accurate using an independent Monitor Unit (MU) and dose calculation algorithm.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | <span> Residential (Per §1-277-021, Subject to Planning Board Review) </span> <span> On-Site Composting (Per §1-277-021, Subject to Planning Board Review) </span> |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
__ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Section 5. 510(k) Summary K193640
{4}------------------------------------------------
This 510(k) Sumary has been created per the requirements of the Safe Medical Device Act (SMDA) of 1990, and the content is provided in conformance with 21 CFR Part 807.92.
# 5.1. Submitter's Information
| Table 1 : Submitter's Information | |
|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Submitter's Name: | Kurt Sysock |
| Company: | Radformation, Inc. |
| Address: | 335 Madison Avenue, 16th Floor<br>New York, NY 10017 |
| Contact Person: | Alan Nelson<br>Chief Science Officer, Radformation |
| Phone: | 518-888-5727 |
| Fax: | ---------- |
| Email: | anelson@radformation.com |
| Date of Summary Preparation | 12/20/2019 |
## 5.2. Device Information
| Table 2 : Device Information | |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name: | ClearCalc |
| Common Name: | Oncology Information System |
| Classification Name: | Class II |
| Classification: | Medical charged-particle radiation therapy system |
| Regulation Number: | 892.5050 |
| Product Code: | MUJ |
| Classification Panel: | Radiology |
## 5.3. Predicate Device Information
RadCalc: 510(k) Number K090531; Regulation number 892.5050; Product code: MUJ
{5}------------------------------------------------
### 5.4. Device Description
The ClearCalc device (model RADCA) is software intended to assist users in determining if their treatment planning calculations are accurate using an independent Monitor Unit (MU) and dose calculation. The treatment plans are obtained from supported Treatment Planning System and Application Programming interfaces.
It is designed to run on the Windows Operating System. ClearCalc performs calculations on the treatment plan data obtained from supported Treatment Planning System and Application Programming interfaces. A Treatment Planning System is software used by trained medical professionals to install and simulate radiation therapy treatments for malignant or benign diseases.
### 5.5. Indications for Use
ClearCalc is intended to assist radiation treatment planners in determining if their treatment planning calculations are accurate using an independent Monitor Unit (MU) and dose calculation algorithm.
### 5.6. Technological Characteristics
ClearCalc (Subject Device) makes use of a Predicate Device, RadCalc (K090531) for substantial equivalence comparison.
### 5.6.1. ClearCalc vs. RadCalc (K090531)
Lifeline Software, Inc.'s RadCalc Software "is a stand-alone program or operating from a server that provides determination of monitor units and/or the dose to various points of interest for external beam radiation therapy and/or brachytherapy treatments. RadCalc is designed to work on personal computers in a Windows operating system that is connected directly to the primary radiation therapy planning system. The program makes the task of performing independent Monitor Unit validations much faster, easier, and more accurate. RadCalc determines the monitor units or dose through the process of looking data up from previously input tables or data curves."
(https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh docs/pdf9/K090531.pdf accessed 12/17/2019)
ClearCalc likewise utilizes an independent calculation algorithm to recalculate the incoming treatment plan's MU and dose for external beam plans as well as dose from radioactive sources for brachytherapy plans. The software is very similar in design and function to the RadCalc software.
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Table 3: Substantial Equivalence ClearCalc vs. RadCalc | | | |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| Parameters | Subject Device: ClearCalc<br>Radformation | Predicate Device: RadCalc<br>(K090531) | Equivalence |
| Indications for<br>use | Used to assist radiation<br>treatment planners in<br>determining if their treatment<br>planning calculations are<br>accurate using an independent<br>Monitor Unit (MU) and dose<br>calculation algorithm. | The intended use of the RadCalc<br>Software is a means of validating<br>the monitors units or radiation<br>dose to points that have been<br>calculated by the primary<br>radiation therapy planning<br>system for external beam<br>radiation therapy and/or<br>brachytherapy treatments. In<br>addition to this, RadCalc<br>Software can also be used as the<br>primary means of calculating<br>monitor units for external beam<br>radiation treatments in situations<br>where the physician does not<br>order the use of a radiation<br>therapy plan. | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Pure software | Yes | Yes | Equivalent |
| Intended users | Trained radiation oncology<br>personnel | Trained radiation oncology<br>personnel | Equivalent |
| OTC/Rx | Rx | Rx | Equivalent |
| | ClearCalc vs. RadCalc Photon MU and Dose Calculation | | |
| Input | Files/Treatment Planning<br>System API-provided data<br>containing CT, Structure Set,<br>and Treatment Plan (including<br>treatment field parameters) data | Files containing Structure Set,<br>and Treatment Plan (including<br>treatment field parameters) data | Minor<br>differences |
| Functionality | Utilizes a Finite-Size Pencil<br>Beam (FSPB) algorithm to<br>calculate MU/Dose on a<br>per-field basis.<br>ClearCalc utilizes the full 3D<br>geometry of the patient for<br>heterogeneity corrections and<br>simulating the scatter conditions<br>of the actual patient. | Utilizes a Clarkson summation<br>algorithm to calculate MU/Dose<br>on a per-field basis.<br>RadCalc utilizes a consistent flat<br>phantom geometry using<br>radiological equivalent depth for<br>heterogeneity corrections and<br>includes modules that allow the<br>user to indicate changes in<br>scatter conditions (e.g. for breast<br>treatments). | Minor<br>differences |
| Output | ClearCalc calculates the dose<br>from fields in a plan and<br>displays results for per-field MU | RadCalc calculates the dose<br>from fields in a plan and displays<br>results for per-field MU and | Equivalent |
| | and provides a difference metric<br>for evaluation in tabular format.<br>Users can also evaluate global<br>point doses, as well as per-field<br>doses. | provides a difference metric for<br>evaluation in tabular format.<br>Users can also evaluate global<br>point doses, as well as per-field<br>doses. | |
| | ClearCalc vs. RadCalc Electron MU and Dose Calculation | | |
| Input | Files/Treatment Planning<br>System API-provided data<br>containing CT, Structure Set,<br>and Treatment Plan (including<br>treatment field parameters) data | Files containing Treatment Plan<br>(including treatment field<br>parameters) data | Minor<br>differences |
| Functionality | Utilize a library of custom<br>cutouts and compute cutout<br>factors using a sector<br>integration method. | Utilize a library of custom cutouts<br>and compute cutout factors using<br>a sector integration or square<br>root method. | Minor<br>differences |
| Output | ClearCalc calculates dose<br>based on electron field<br>parameters and cutout<br>geometry, and displays results<br>for per-field MU and dose and<br>provides a difference metric for<br>evaluation in tabular format. | RadCalc calculates dose based<br>on electron field parameters and<br>cutout geometry, and displays results<br>for per-field MU and dose and<br>provides a difference metric for<br>evaluation in tabular format. | Equivalent |
| | ClearCalc vs. RadCalc Brachytherapy Dose Calculation | | |
| Input | Files or Treatment Planning<br>System API-provided data<br>containing Treatment Plan<br>(including source positions and<br>dwell times) data | Files containing Treatment Plan<br>(including source positions and<br>dwell times) data | Minor<br>differences |
| Functionality | Utilizes the AAPM TG-43<br>protocol for its brachytherapy<br>dose calculations | Utilizes the AAPM TG-43<br>protocol for its brachytherapy<br>dose calculations | Equivalent |
| Output | ClearCalc calculates dose to<br>arbitrary calculation point<br>locations and presents<br>difference metrics comparing<br>the TPS dose vs. ClearCalc<br>dose in a tabular format | RadCalc calculates dose to<br>arbitrary calculation point<br>locations and presents difference<br>metrics comparing the TPS dose<br>vs. RadCalc dose in a tabular<br>format | Equivalent |
{7}------------------------------------------------
## 5.7. Performance Data
As with the Predicate Device, no clinical trials were performed for ClearCalc. Verification tests were performed to ensure that the software works as intended and pass/fail criteria were used to verify requirements.
{8}------------------------------------------------
### 5.8. Conclusion
ClearCalc is deemed substantially equivalent to the Predicate Device, RadCalc (K090531). Verification and Validation testing and Hazard Analysis demonstrate that ClearCalc is as safe and effective as the Predicate Device. The minor technological differences between ClearCalc and the Predicate Device with regard to the independent MU and dose calculation do not raise any questions on the safety and effectiveness of the Subject Device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.