K193639 · Medartis AG · HRS · Mar 26, 2020 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K193639
Device Name
APTUS® Foot 2.8-3.5 System
Applicant
Medartis AG
Product Code
HRS · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Mar 26, 2020
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3030
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The APTUS® Foot 2.8-3.5 System is intended for use in fractures, osteotomies and arthrodesis of the tarsals, metatarsals and phalanges.
Device Story
System comprises bone plates, wedges, and screws for internal fixation of foot bones; plates available in various anatomic designs, widths, and thicknesses; wedges support opening wedge osteotomies; screws include locking (TriLock) and non-locking (cortical/cancellous) types. Used by orthopedic surgeons in clinical settings for fracture repair and arthrodesis. Device provides mechanical stabilization of bone segments to facilitate healing. Surgeon selects appropriate plate/screw configuration based on patient anatomy and fracture pattern; components are implanted to maintain bone alignment during the healing process.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Substantial equivalence supported by non-clinical bench testing, including biocompatibility, engineering analysis, and comparative dynamic mechanical testing of worst-case simulated fracture/osteotomy constructs against predicate devices.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Unalloyed titanium (ASTM F67) or titanium alloy (ASTM F136). Components: Bone plates, wedges, and screws (locking/non-locking). Screw diameters: 2.8 mm, 3.5 mm, 4.0 mm. Plate dimensions: 12-29 mm width, 25-92 mm length, 1.6-2.5 mm thickness. Mechanical testing per ASTM F543. Sterilization: Referenced from previous submissions (K091479, K191848, K181425).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring internal fixation for fractures, osteotomies, and arthrodesis of the tarsals, metatarsals, and phalanges.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliances and accessories are devices intended to be implanted consisting of one or more metallic components and their metallic fasteners. The devices contain a plate, a nail/plate combination, or a blade/plate combination that are made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, stainless steel, and titanium, that are intended to be held in position with fasteners, such as screws and nails, or bolts, nuts, and washers. These devices are used for fixation of fractures of the proximal or distal end of long bones, such as intracapsular, intertrochanteric, intercervical, supracondylar, or condylar fractures of the femur; for fusion of a joint; or for surgical procedures that involve cutting a bone. The devices may be implanted or attached through the skin so that a pulling force (traction) may be applied to the skeletal system.
{0}------------------------------------------------
March 26, 2020
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logos of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, featuring a stylized human figure. To the right is the FDA logo, with the letters "FDA" in a blue square and the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
Medartis AG % Kevin A. Thomas Vice President and Director of Regulatory Affairs PaxMed International, LLC 12264 El Camino Real, Suite 400 San Diego, California 92130
Re: K193639
Trade/Device Name: APTUS® Foot 2.8-3.5 System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3030 Regulation Name: Single/Multiple Component Metallic Bone Fixation Appliances And Accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HRS, HWC, PLF Dated: December 27, 2019 Received: December 27, 2019
Dear Kevin Thomas:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Shumaya Ali, M.P.H. Assistant Director DHT6C: Division of Restorative, Repair and Trauma Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K193639
Device Name
APTUS® Foot 2.8-3.5 System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The APTUS® Foot 2.8-3.5 System is intended for use in fractures and arthrodesis of the tarsals. metatarsals and phalanges.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff @fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
# K193639
# Medartis AG
# APTUS® Foot 2.8-3.5 System
March 20, 2020
#### ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
| Manufacturer Name | Medartis AG<br>Hochbergerstrasse 60E<br>CH-4057 Basel, Switzerland<br>Telephone: +41 61 633 34 34<br>Fax: +41 61 633 34 00 |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Official Contact | Andrea Kiefer-Schweizer<br>Head of Quality Management and Regulatory Affairs |
| Representative/Consultant | Kevin A. Thomas, PhD<br>Floyd G. Larson, MS, MBA<br>PaxMed International, LLC<br>12264 El Camino Real, Suite 400<br>San Diego, CA 92130<br>Telephone: +1 858-792-1235 |
Fax:
Email:
#### DEVICE NAME AND CLASSIFICATION
| Trade/Proprietary Name | APTUS® Foot 2.8-3.5 System |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name | Plate, fixation, bone |
| Classification Name | Single/multiple component metallic bone fixation appliance<br>and accessories |
| Classification Regulation | 21 CFR 888.3030 |
| Product Code | HRS, PLF, HWC |
| Classification Panel | Orthopedic |
| Reviewing Office | Office of Health Technology 6 (Orthopedic Devices) |
| Reviewing Division | Division of Health Technology 6 C<br>(Restorative, Repair and Trauma Devices) |
+1 858-792-1236
kthomas@paxmed.com flarson@paxmed.com
#### PREDICATE DEVICE INFORMATION
Primary Predicate Device K091479, APTUS® Foot System, Medartis AG
Additional Predicates K061808, DARCO Locking Bone Plate System, DARCO International, Inc. K052614, Arthrex Low Profile Plate and Screw System, Arthrex, Inc. K000684, Small Fragment Dynamic Compression Locking (DCL) System, Synthes (USA)
{4}------------------------------------------------
# INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT
The APTUS® Foot 2.8-3.5 System is intended for use in fractures, osteotomies and arthrodesis of the tarsals, metatarsals and phalanges.
# SUBJECT DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The subject device includes: various designs of bone plates (23 plates); wedges and screws for use with various plates for use in performing an opening wedge osteotomy (8 wedges); additional lengths of 3.5 TriLock Screws (locking screws, other lengths cleared in K110908); a new design of 3.5 Cortical Screws (non-locking) in various lengths; and a new design of 4.0 Cancellous Screws in various lengths.
The subject device plates are provided in multiple anatomic designs that vary in length, width, and thickness. The overall dimensions of the plates vary in width from approximately 12 mm to 29 mm, and in length from approximately 25 mm to 92 mm. The plates vary in thickness from 1.6 mm to 2.5 mm.
The subject device plates are used with TriLock locking screws and non-locking screws (cortical and cancellous), including subject device screws and previously cleared Medartis screws. Compatible TriLock locking screws and non-locking cortical screws have a diameter of 2.8 mm and overall lengths ranging from 8 mm to 60 mm. The subject device non-locking cancellous screws have a diameter of 4 mm and overall lengths ranging from 10 mm to 60 mm. The 2.8 Cortical Screws (non-locking), the 3.5 Cortical Screws (non-locking), and the 4.0 Cancellous Screws (non-locking) all have a double-lead thread design. All TriLock Screws (locking) have a double-lead thread design. The subject device plates also are compatible with Medartis K-Wires cleared under K092038.
The subject device screws include screws with the same design as 3.5 TriLock Screws cleared in K110908, with a diameter of 3.5 mm and provided in additional lengths of 10 mm, 12 mm, and 14 mm. The subject device screws also include a new design of 3.5 Cortical Screws provided with a diameter of 3.5 mm and lengths of 10 mm to 60 mm, and a new design of 4.0 Cancellous Screws, with a diameter of 4.0 mm and lengths of 10 mm to 60 mm.
The subject device also includes wedges that are used to support fixation of an opening wedge osteotomy. The wedges are stabilized by corresponding wedge screws that are placed through a plate. The subject device wedges are provided in two size series. The small wedges are 7 mm wide and vary in thickness from 4 mm to 7 mm. The large wedges are 10 mm wide and vary in thickness from 6 mm to 12 mm. The corresponding wedge screws are provided in two sizes: the small wedge screw is used to attach a wedge using an HD7 plate hole (2.8 mm screw hole), and the large wedge screw is to attach a wedge using an HD15 plate hole (3.5 mm screw hole).
The subject device plates, wedges, and screws are manufactured from unalloyed titanium conforming to ASTM F67 or titanium alloy conforming to ASTM F136.
# PERFORMANCE DATA
Non-clinical testing data submitted, referenced, or relied upon to demonstrate substantial equivalence included: biocompatibility testing and sterilization referenced from K091479, K191848, and K181425; engineering analysis; and cantilever construct fatigue bend testing against the predicate. Clinical data were not provided in this submission.
{5}------------------------------------------------
# EQUIVALENCE TO MARKETED DEVICE
The subject device is substantially equivalent in indications and design principles to the primary predicate device and the additional predicate devices listed above. Provided at the end of this summary is a table comparing the Indications for Use Statements and the technological characteristics of the subject device, the primary predicate device, and the additional predicate devices.
The subject device and the primary predicate device, and additional predicate devices have the same intended use for internal fixation of various bones including those of the lower extremity. The Indications for Use Statement (IFUS) for the subject device is similar to that of the primary predicate device K091479.
The differences among the Indications for Use Statements for the subject device and the additional predicate devices (K061808, K052614, and K000684) include language regarding use in fixation of bones locations other than the lower extremity, use in pediatric patients (K061808), or osteopenic bone (K000684). These differences do not impact substantial equivalence because all IFUS express equivalent intended use for internal fixation of various bones including those of the lower extremity.
The plates from the subject device, the primary predicate device K091479, and the additional predicate devices K061808, K052614, and K000684 have the same technological characteristics, have similar design characteristics, screw holes to accommodate locking and non-locking screws, and use the same operating principles for bone fixation. The plates from the subject device, the primary predicate device, and the additional predicate devices encompass a similar range of physical features and dimensions (number of screw holes, overall length, and thickness) but differ slightly.
The additional predicate devices K061808 and K052614 are for support of substantial equivalence of the subject device plate and screw designs, and for comparison in mechanical testing. In comparative testing of plate and screw constructs, the subject device Calcaneus Step Plates, Calcaneus Opening Wedge Plates (with subject device Wedges), Medial Column Plates, and Talonavicular Plates were shown to be substantially equivalent to plates from the additional predicate device K061808. The subject device Cuneiform plates were shown to be substantially equivalent to plates from the additional predicate device K052614. In comparative testing of screws, the subject device 3.5 TriLock Screws and 3.5 Cortical Screws were shown to be substantially equivalent to screws from the additional predicate device K000684, and the subject device 4.0 Cancellous Screws were shown to be substantially equivalent to screws from the additional predicate device K052614.
Differences among the subject device, the primary predicate K051567, and the additional predicate devices (K061808, K052614, and K000684) include the specific plate designs, the specific lengths of screws, and the materials used for manufacturing (K00684 includes screws manufactured from stainless steel). These differences do not impact substantial equivalence in terms of the intended use for internal fixation of the lower extremity.
The plates, wedges, and screws from the subject device are manufactured from unalloyed titanium conforming to ASTM F67 or from titanium alloy material conforming to ASTM F136 identical to these materials used to manufacture the primary predicate device K091479. All of the subject device final, finished components are manufactured in the same facilities using identical materials and identical manufacturing processes as used for the primary predicate device K091479.
{6}------------------------------------------------
The device-specific instruments are made of stainless steel that is identical to the material used for similar Medartis instruments previously cleared in various submissions including K192297 and K181428. The device-specific accessories have similar designs and are made of the identical materials as the Medartis AG accessory trays included in K192297 and K181425.
Mechanical performance evaluation of the subject device included comparative dynamic testing of worstcase simulated fracture or osteotomy constructs. Mechanical testing of subject device screws was performed according to ASTM F543 Standard Specification and Test Methods for Metallic Medical Bone Screws. Based on the results of the testing, the performance of the subject device was judged to be substantially equivalent to the additional predicate devices K061808, K052614, and K000684.
#### CONCLUSION
The subject device, the primary predicate device, and the additional predicate devices have the same intended use, have similar technological characteristics, and encompass a similar range of physical dimensions appropriate to the anatomy. The subject device and the primary predicate device are made of the identical material. The data included in this submission demonstrate substantial equivalence to the primary predicate device K091479 and the additional predicate devices K061808, 052614, and K000684.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.