Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin A, Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin G, Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin M
K193525 · HORIBA ABX SAS · CZP · Jun 26, 2020 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K193525
Device Name
Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin A, Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin G, Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin M
Applicant
HORIBA ABX SAS
Product Code
CZP · Immunology
Decision Date
Jun 26, 2020
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5510
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin A reagent is intended for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of Immunoglobulin A (IgA) in serum and lithium heparin plasma by immunoturbidimetry on Yumizen analyzers. Measurement of this immunoglobulin aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents. This test should be used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin G reagent is intended for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) in serum and lithium heparin plasma by immunoturbidimetry on Yumizen analyzers. Measurement of this immunoglobulin aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents. This test should be used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin M reagent is intended for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of Immunoglobulin M (IgM) in serum and lithium heparin plasma by immunoturbidimetry on Yumizen analyzers. Measurement of this immunoglobulin aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents. This test should be used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
Device Story
Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin A, G, and M reagents are liquid, ready-to-use immunoturbidimetric assays for use on the Yumizen C1200 clinical chemistry analyzer. The device measures the concentration of specific immunoglobulins in human serum or lithium heparin plasma samples via an antigen-antibody reaction. The analyzer performs photometric measurements to determine the turbidity resulting from this reaction. The device is intended for use in clinical laboratory settings by trained laboratory personnel. Results are provided to clinicians to assist in diagnosing abnormal protein metabolism and immune system deficiencies. The device provides quantitative results that are used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings to support patient management.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance validated via precision (repeatability, between-run, between-day, between-instrument, lot-to-lot), linearity (R² ≥ 0.998), and interference studies. Method comparison against predicate devices using 129 (IgA), 214 (IgG), and 153 (IgM) remnant serum samples showed high correlation (r ≥ 0.996) and Passing-Bablok slopes near 1.0. Reference ranges verified using blood bank samples.
Technological Characteristics
Liquid immunoturbidimetric reagents; TRIS buffer with goat anti-human IgA, IgG, or IgM antibodies. Traceable to ERM-DA470k/IFCC. Designed for use on Yumizen C1200 analyzers. Measuring ranges: IgA (10–700 mg/dL), IgG (75–3000 mg/dL), IgM (20–500 mg/dL).
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of IgA, IgG, and IgM in serum and lithium heparin plasma to aid in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and immune deficiency. For prescription use only on Yumizen C1200 analyzers.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, and E immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, an E (serum antibodies) in serum. Measurement of these immunoglobulins aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents.
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K193525
B Applicant
Horiba ABX SAS
C Proprietary and Established Names
Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin A, Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin G, Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin M
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CZP | Class II | 21 CFR 866.5510 - Immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, And E Immunological Test System | IM - Immunology |
| DEW | Class II | 21 CFR 866.5510 - Immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, and E immunological test system | IM - Immunology |
| CFN | Class II | 21 CFR 866.5510 - Immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, and E immunological test system | IM - Immunology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
New Assays
B Measurand:
Immunoglobulin A (IgA)
Immunoglobulin G (IgG)
Immunoglobulin M (IgM)
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
C Type of Test:
Quantitative immunoturbidimetric assays
III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
B Indication(s) for Use:
Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin A reagent is intended for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of Immunoglobulin A (IgA) in serum and lithium heparin plasma by immunoturbidimetry on Yumizen analyzers. Measurement of this immunoglobulin aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents. This test should be used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin G reagent is intended for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) in serum and lithium heparin plasma by immunoturbidimetry on Yumizen analyzers. Measurement of this immunoglobulin aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents. This test should be used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin M reagent is intended for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of Immunoglobulin M (IgM) in serum and lithium heparin plasma by immunoturbidimetry on Yumizen analyzers. Measurement of this immunoglobulin aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents. This test should be used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
D Special Instrument Requirements:
For the Yumizen C1200 (K183375 and K191993) only
IV Device/System Characteristics:
A Device Description:
Yumizen C1200 IgA:
- Reagent 1: TRIS buffer solution
- Reagent 2: Goat anti-human IgA antibodies in TRIS buffer
Yumizen C1200 IgG:
K193525 - Page 2 of 16
{2}
- Reagent 1: TRIS buffer solution
- Reagent 2: Goat anti-human IgG antibodies in TRIS buffer
Yumizen C1200 IgM:
- Reagent 1: TRIS buffer solution
- Reagent 2: Goat anti-human IgM antibodies in TRIS buffer
All assays' calibrators and control materials are sold separately.
## B Principle of Operation:
These immunoturbidimetric assays measure increasing sample turbidity caused by the formation of insoluble immune complexes when goat anti-human immunoglobulin (IgA, IgG, or IgM) antibodies are bound to the specific immunoglobulin (IgA, IgG, or IgM) in the sample. The IgA, IgG, or IgM concentration is proportional to the amount of turbidity formed.
## V Substantial Equivalence Information:
### A Predicate Device Name(s):
Olympus IgA Reagent, Olympus IgG Reagent, Olympus IgM Reagent
### B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K073489, K073490, K073487
### C Comparison with Predicate(s):
Yumizen C1200 IgA:
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K193525 | K073489 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Yumizen C1200 IgA | Olympus IgA Reagent, Model: OSR6X171 |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin A reagent is intended for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of Immunoglobulin A (IgA) in serum and lithium heparin plasma by immunoturbidimetry on Yumizen analyzers. Measurement of this immunoglobulin aids in the | System reagent for the quantitative determination of IgA immunoglobulins in human serum and plasma on Beckman Coulter AU analyzers. The spectrum of abnormalities in serum immunoglobulin concentrations is broad. |
K193525 - Page 3 of 16
{3}
K193525 - Page 4 of 16
diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body’s lack of ability to resist infectious agents. This test should be used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
Abnormal concentrations range from a virtual absence of one or more of the three major classes of immunoglobulin (IgG, IgA, and IgM) to polyclonal increases in one or more immunoglobulins.
Measurement of these immunoglobulins aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents.
For in vitro diagnostic use.
Measuring Range 10–700 mg/dL Same
Assay Type Quantitative Same
Reagent Format Liquid Same
Traceability/Standardization DA470k/IFCC Same
General Device Characteristic Differences
Instrument Platform Yumizen C1200 Beckman Coulter Olympus AU400
Assay Method Immunoturbidimetry Turbidimetry
Sample Matrices Serum
Li-heparin plasma Serum
Li-heparin plasma
EDTA plasma
On-board reagent stability 60 days 6 weeks
Reference range 70–400 mg/dL 66–433 mg/dL
Yumizen C1200 IgG:
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K193525 | K073490 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Yumizen C1200 IgG | Olympus IgG Reagent, Model: OSR6X172 |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin G reagent is intended for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) in | System reagent for the quantitative determination of IgG immunoglobulins in human serum and plasma on Beckman Coulter AU |
{4}
K193525 - Page 5 of 16
serum and lithium heparin plasma by immunoturbidimetry on Yumizen analyzers. Measurement of this immunoglobulin aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents. This test should be used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
| Measuring Range | 75–3000 mg/dL | Same |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Assay Type | Quantitative | Same |
| Reagent Format | Liquid | Same |
| Traceability/Standardization | DA470k/IFCC | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Instrument Platform | Yumizen C1200 | Beckman Coulter Olympus AU400 |
| Assay Method | Immunoturbidimetry | Turbidimetry |
| Sample Matrices | Serum Li-heparin plasma | Serum Li-heparin plasma EDTA plasma |
| On-board reagent stability | 6 weeks | 90 days |
| Reference range | 700–1600 mg/dL | 635–1741 mg/dL |
Yumizen C1200 IgM:
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K193525 | K073487 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Yumizen C1200 IgM | Olympus IgM Reagent, Model: OSR6X173 |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | Yumizen C1200 Immunoglobulin M reagent is intended for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of Immunoglobulin M (IgM) in serum and lithium heparin plasma by immunoturbidimetry on Yumizen analyzers. Measurement of this immunoglobulin aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents. This test should be used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. | System reagent for the quantitative determination of IgM immunoglobulins in human serum and plasma on Beckman Coulter AU analyzers. The spectrum of abnormalities in serum immunoglobulin concentrations is broad. Abnormal concentrations |
{5}
| | ability to resist infectious agents. This test should be used in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. | range from a virtual absence of one or more of the three major classes of immunoglobulin (IgA, IgG, and IgM) to polyclonal increases in one or more immunoglobulins. Measurement of these immunoglobulins aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents. For in vitro diagnostic use. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Measuring Range | 20–500 mg/dL | Same |
| Assay Type | Quantitative | Same |
| Reagent Format | Liquid | Same |
| Traceability/Standardization | DA470k/IFCC | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Instrument Platform | Yumizen C1200 | Beckman Coulter Olympus AU400 |
| Assay Method | Immunoturbidimetry | Turbidimetry |
| Sample Matrices | Serum Li-heparin plasma | Serum Li-heparin plasma EDTA plasma |
| On-board reagent stability | 6 weeks | 90 days |
| Reference range | 40–230 mg/dL | 45–281 mg/dL |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
- CLSI EP05-A3: Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures– Third Edition - October 2014
- CLSI EP17-A2: Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures – Second Edition - June 2012
- CLSI EP06-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative measurement Procedures A Statistical Approach – First Edition – April 2003
- CLSI C28-A3: Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical laboratory- Third Edition – November 2008
- CLSI EP25-A: Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic reagents- First Edition- September 2009
K193525 - Page 6 of 16
{6}
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Yumizen C1200 IgA:
The precision of the Yumizen C1200 IgA assay was evaluated on three Yumizen C1200 immunoassay analyzers using one reagent lot. Five human sera samples and two levels of Yumizen C1200 Protein Control were tested with two replicates per run, two runs per day for 20 days on each analyzer (n=240 per sample). The results are summarized below:
| IgA | | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Instrument | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample | Mean (mg/dL) | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Sera 1 | 62 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 2.5 |
| Sera 2 | 112 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 1.7 |
| Sera 3 | 239 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 6.1 | 2.6 |
| Sera 4 | 431 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 12.4 | 2.9 | 5.5 | 1.3 | 14.2 | 2.0 | 16.7 | 3.8 |
| Sera 5 | 547 | 5.2 | 0.9 | 6.6 | 1.2 | 8.0 | 1.5 | 11.6 | 2.0 | 15.8 | 2.9 |
| Control 1 | 117 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 4.3 | 3.7 |
| Control 2 | 365 | 3.2 | 0.9 | 7.5 | 2.1 | 5.1 | 1.4 | 9.6 | 1.7 | 11.4 | 3.1 |
The lot-to-lot reproducibility of the Yumizen C1200 IgA assay was evaluated on one analyzer using three reagent lots. Five human sera samples and two levels of Yumizen C1200 Protein Control were tested in triplicates per run, two runs per day for five days on each lot (n=90 per sample). The results are summarized below:
| IgA | | Repeatability | | Between-Day | | Within-Lot | | Between-Lot | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample | Mean (mg/dL) | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Sera 1 | 63 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 | 1.2 |
| Sera 2 | 113 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 4.7 | 4.1 | 0 | 0 | 4.7 | 4.1 |
| Sera 3 | 243 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| Sera 4 | 434 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 5.9 | 1.4 | 10.4 | 2.4 | 0 | 0 | 10.4 | 2.4 |
| Sera 5 | 563 | 6.9 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 7.0 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 7.3 | 1.3 |
| Control 1 | 117 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Control 2 | 372 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 4.1 | 1.1 |
Yumizen C1200 IgG:
The precision of the Yumizen C1200 IgG assay was evaluated on three Yumizen C1200 immunoassay analyzers using one reagent lot. Five human sera samples and two levels of Yumizen C1200 Protein Control were tested with two replicates per run, two runs per day for 20 days on each analyzer (n=240 per sample). The results are summarized below:
K193525 - Page 7 of 16
{7}
| IgG | | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Instrument | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample | Mean (mg/dL) | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Sera 1 | 314 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 5.6 | 1.8 | 7.5 | 2.4 |
| Sera 2 | 541 | 7.4 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 9.6 | 1.8 |
| Sera 3 | 1027 | 15.9 | 1.5 | 4.2 | 0.4 | 14.9 | 1.5 | 13.0 | 1.3 | 25.7 | 2.5 |
| Sera 4 | 1721 | 29.8 | 1.7 | 4.1 | 0.2 | 24.2 | 1.4 | 15.7 | 0.9 | 41.6 | 2.4 |
| Sera 5 | 2236 | 46.6 | 2.1 | 0 | 0 | 39.8 | 1.8 | 25.0 | 1.1 | 15.8 | 3.0 |
| Control 1 | 659 | 7.6 | 1.2 | 5.5 | 0.8 | 12.1 | 1.8 | 11.3 | 1.7 | 19.0 | 2.9 |
| Control 2 | 1885 | 34.8 | 1.8 | 8.2 | 0.4 | 43.7 | 2.3 | 26.7 | 1.4 | 62.4 | 3.3 |
The lot-to-lot reproducibility of the Yumizen C1200 IgG assay was evaluated on one analyzer using three reagent lots. Five human sera samples and two levels of Yumizen C1200 Protein Control were tested in triplicates per run, two runs per day for five days on each lot (n=90 per sample). The results are summarized below:
| IgG | | Repeatability | | Between-Day | | Within-Lot | | Between-Lot | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample | Mean (mg/dL) | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Sera 1 | 306 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 5.1 | 1.7 | 6.3 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 2.3 |
| Sera 2 | 530 | 6.1 | 1.2 | 4.4 | 0.8 | 7.5 | 1.4 | 4.1 | 0.8 | 8.5 | 1.6 |
| Sera 3 | 994 | 10.2 | 1.0 | 7.5 | 0.8 | 12.7 | 1.3 | 9.8 | 1.0 | 16.0 | 1.6 |
| Sera 4 | 1666 | 21.1 | 1.3 | 17.8 | 1.1 | 27.6 | 1.7 | 17.6 | 1.1 | 32.7 | 2.0 |
| Sera 5 | 2184 | 23.6 | 1.1 | 18.6 | 0.9 | 30.0 | 1.4 | 9.5 | 0.4 | 31.5 | 1.4 |
| Control 1 | 636 | 5.6 | 0.9 | 8.5 | 1.3 | 10.1 | 1.6 | 3.9 | 0.6 | 10.8 | 1.7 |
| Control 2 | 1821 | 23.8 | 1.3 | 23.0 | 1.3 | 33.1 | 1.8 | 7.3 | 0.4 | 33.9 | 1.9 |
# Yumizen C1200 IgM:
The precision of the Yumizen C1200 IgM assay was evaluated on three Yumizen C1200 immunoassay analyzers using one reagent lot. Five human sera samples and two levels of Yumizen C1200 Protein Control were tested with two replicates per run, two runs per day for 20 days on each analyzer (n=240 per sample). The results are summarized below:
| IgM | | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Instrument | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample | Mean (mg/dL) | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Sera 1 | 56 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| Sera 2 | 120 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 1.7 |
| Sera 3 | 161 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 1.4 |
| Sera 4 | 209 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 1.3 |
| Sera 5 | 443 | 3.0 | 0.7 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 3.2 | 0.7 | 5.6 | 1.3 | 7.9 | 1.8 |
| Control 1 | 88 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 0 | 0 | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| Control 2 | 273 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 4.8 | 1.8 |
K193525 - Page 8 of 16
{8}
The lot-to-lot reproducibility of the Yumizen C1200 IgM assay was evaluated on one analyzer using three reagent lots. Five human sera samples and two levels of Yumizen C1200 Protein Control were tested in triplicates per run, two runs per day for five days on each lot (n=90 per sample). The results are summarized below:
| IgM | | Repeatability | | Between Day | | Within Lot | | Between Lot | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample | Mean (mg/dL) | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Sera 1 | 53 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 2.7 |
| Sera 2 | 119 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Sera 3 | 160 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 1.1 |
| Sera 4 | 209 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.4 |
| Sera 5 | 444 | 5.3 | 1.2 | 3.6 | 0.8 | 6.4 | 1.4 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 7.8 | 1.8 |
| Control 1 | 86 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Control 2 | 276 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 4.7 | 1.7 |
2. Linearity:
Yumizen C1200 IgA:
Linearity: Linearity of the Yumizen C1200 IgA assay was assessed according to CLSI EP06-A. A high concentration IgA-spiked human serum sample and an IgA-depleted serum were used to create a dilution series covering above and below the measuring range. Sample dilutions were assayed in quadruplicate within a single run and samples within the measuring range were used to determine linearity:
| Dilution Range (mg/dL) | Regression Equation | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | R² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 21–660 | y=1.027x–0.004 | 1.012–1.043 | -0.060–0.051 | 0.998 |
Auto-rerun validation study: An auto-rerun study was performed to evaluate the accuracy of the analyzer's auto dilution function to obtain results for IgA samples with analyte concentrations above the primary measuring range (700 mg/dL). Seven samples were used for the study, ranging from 715–1988 mg/dL. Each sample was manually diluted with a 1:3 ratio. The automatic instrument dilutions and the manual dilutions were measured in quadruplicates. The results of the auto-rerun study support the claim that samples having concentrations up to 2100 mg/dL can be run via the rerun function which uses a 1:3 dilution.
Prozone effect: The potential for a prozone effect was evaluated for the IgA assay. Testing elevated samples did not indicate a prozone effect with concentrations up to 2320 mg/dL.
Yumizen C1200 IgG:
K193525 - Page 9 of 16
{9}
Linearity: Linearity of the Yumizen C1200 IgG assay was assessed according to CLSI EP06-A. A high concentration IgG-spiked human serum sample and an IgG-depleted serum were used to create a dilution series covering above and below the measuring range. Sample dilutions were assayed in quadruplicate within a single run and samples within the measuring range were used to determine linearity:
| Dilution Range (mg/dL) | Regression Equation | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | R² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 82–2942 | y=0.996x–0.254 | 0.985–1.008 | 0.070– -0.440 | 0.999 |
Auto-rerun validation study: An auto-rerun study was performed to evaluate the accuracy of the analyzer's auto dilution function to obtain results for IgG samples with analyte concentrations above the primary measuring range (3000 mg/dL). Seven samples were used for the study, ranging from 3120–8738 mg/dL. Each sample was manually diluted with a 1:3 ratio. The automatic instrument dilutions and the manual dilutions were measured in quadruplicates. The results of the auto-rerun study support the claim that samples having concentrations up to 9000 mg/dL can be run via the rerun function which uses a 1:3 dilution.
Prozone effect: The potential for a prozone effect was evaluated for the IgG assay. Testing elevated samples did not indicate a prozone effect with concentrations up to 9860 mg/dL.
# Yumizen C1200 IgM:
Linearity: Linearity of the Yumizen C1200 IgM assay was assessed according to CLSI EP06-A. A high concentration IgM-spiked human serum sample and an IgM-depleted serum were used to create a dilution series covering above and below the measuring range. Sample dilutions were assayed in quadruplicate within a single run and samples within the measuring range were used to determine linearity:
| Dilution Range (mg/dL) | Regression Equation | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | R² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26–416 | y=1.013x–0.087 | 1.001–1.025 | -0.115– -0.059 | 0.998 |
Auto-rerun validation study: An auto-rerun study was performed to evaluate the accuracy of the analyzer's auto dilution function to obtain results for IgM samples with analyte concentrations above the primary measuring range (500 mg/dL). Seven samples were used for the study, ranging from 557–1361 mg/dL. Each sample was manually diluted with a 1:3 ratio. The automatic instrument dilutions and the manual dilutions were measured in quadruplicates. The results of the auto-rerun study support the claim that samples having concentrations up to 1500 mg/dL can be run via the rerun function which uses a 1:3 dilution.
K193525 - Page 10 of 16
{10}
Prozone effect: The potential for a prozone effect was evaluated for the IgM assay. Testing elevated samples did not indicate a prozone effect with concentrations up to 5000 mg/dL.
## 3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
For all three assays, the effect of the presence of endogenous and exogenous interferents in samples was evaluated by testing native unmodified serum pools at two analyte levels (normal and high) with a range of concentrations of the substances listed below. Each sample was tested at four concentrations of interferent and with an interferent-free control in four replicates each. The percent recovery for each sample spiked with the interference substance was calculated by comparing its result to that of the corresponding reference sample spiked with an equal volume of the solvent without the interference substance. No interference was observed up to the following concentration of each interference substance for each assay.
| Interferent (mg/dL) | IgA | IgG | IgM |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hemoglobin | 500.0 | 500.0 | 250.0 |
| Triglycerides | 531.1 | 456.8 | 520.6 |
| Total Bilirubin | 29.2 | 39.0 | 27.9 |
| Direct Bilirubin | 22.8 | 18.4 | 13.1 |
| Ascorbic Acid | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Acetylsalicylic Acid | 65.2 | 65.2 | 65.2 |
| Ibuprofen | 50.1 | 50.1 | 50.1 |
| Acetaminophen | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
## 4. Assay Reportable Range:
**Yumizen C1200 IgA:**
The claimed measuring range is from 10 mg/dL to 700 mg/dL.
**Yumizen C1200 IgG:**
The claimed measuring range is from 75 mg/dL to 3000 mg/dL.
**Yumizen C1200 IgM:**
The claimed measuring range is from 20 mg/dL to 500 mg/dL.
## 5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
**Traceability:**
All three assays are traceable to ERM-DA470k/IFCC.
K193525 - Page 11 of 16
{11}
# Stability:
Real-time shelf-life stability testing supports a shelf-life for unopened reagents stored at the labeling recommendation $(2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ . On-board reagent stability studies support the claims that the reagents can be stored on board the Yumizen C1200. The results are summarized below:
| Stability Claims | IgA | IgG | IgM |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reagent Shelf-life if stored as recommended | 24 months | 24 months | 24 months |
| Reagent On-board | 6 weeks | 6 weeks | 6 weeks |
| Serum Sample* | 8 months at 20–25°C 8 months at 2–8°C 8 months at -20°C | 1 week at 20–25°C 3 months at 4–8°C >6 months at -20°C | 2 months at 20–25°C 4 months at 4–8°C 6 months at -20°C |
| *Sample stability claims in the package insert cite published references. The package labeling states a sample should be frozen only once. | | | |
# 6. Detection Limit:
The detection limits of all three assays were performed according to CLSI EP17-A2. The Limit of Blank (LoB) corresponds to the concentration below which analyte-free samples are found with a probability of $95\%$ . The Limit of Detection (LoD) is determined based on the limit of blank and the standard deviation of low concentration samples. The limit of detection corresponds to the lowest analyte concentration which can be detected (value above the limit of blank with a probability of $95\%$ ). The Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) was defined as the lowest analyte concentration which can be quantified with a total error of $\leq 20\%$ .
# Yumizen C1200 IgA:
# LoB:
The LoB of the IgA assay was determined by assaying one IgA-depleted sample in five replicates per day for four days on three Yumizen instruments. A total of 60 data points per lot were generated; two lots were tested. The LoB for each lot was calculated separately. The LoB was defined as the higher value, $0.5\mathrm{mg / dL}$ .
# LoD:
The LoD of the IgA assay was determined by testing four low analyte samples in quadruplicate for four days on one instrument. A total of 64 data points per lot were generated; two lots were tested. The LoD for each lot was calculated separately. The LoD was defined as the higher value, $0.9\mathrm{mg / dL}$ .
# LoQ:
The LoQ of the IgA assay was determined by testing five low native samples in quadruplicate per run, two runs per day, for five days on one instrument. A total of 360 data points per lot were generated; two lots were tested. The LoQ for each lot was calculated separately. The LoQ was defined as the higher value, $8\mathrm{mg / dL}$ .
# Yumizen C1200 IgG:
# LoB:
The LoB of the IgG assay was determined by assaying one IgG-depleted sample in five replicates per day for four days on three Yumizen instruments. A total of 60 data points
K193525 - Page 12 of 16
{12}
per lot were generated; two lots were tested. The LoB for each lot was calculated separately. The LoB was defined as the higher value, 0 mg/dL.
**LoD:**
The LoD of the IgG assay was determined by testing four low analyte samples in quadruplicate for four days on one instrument. A total of 64 data points per lot were generated; two lots were tested. The LoD for each lot was calculated separately. The LoD was defined as the higher value, 1 mg/dL.
**LoQ:**
The LoQ of the IgG assay was determined by testing five low native samples in quadruplicate per run, two runs per day, for five days on one instrument. A total of 360 data points per lot were generated; two lots were tested. The LoQ for each lot was calculated separately. The LoQ was defined as the higher value, 53 mg/dL.
**Yumizen C1200 IgM:**
**LoB:**
The LoB of the IgM assay was determined by assaying one IgM-depleted sample in five replicates per day for four days on three Yumizen instruments. A total of 60 data points per lot were generated; two lots were tested. The LoB for each lot was calculated separately. The LoB was defined as the higher value, 0.3 mg/dL.
**LoD:**
The LoD of the IgM assay was determined by testing four low analyte samples in quadruplicate for four days on one instrument. A total of 64 data points per lot were generated; two lots were tested. The LoD for each lot was calculated separately. The LoD was defined as the higher value, 1 mg/dL.
**LoQ:**
The LoQ of the IgM assay was determined by testing five low native samples in quadruplicate per run, two runs per day, for five days on one instrument. A total of 360 data points per lot were generated; two lots were tested. The LoQ for each lot was calculated separately. The LoQ was defined as the higher value, 3 mg/dL.
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
**B Comparison Studies:**
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
**Yumizen C1200 IgA:**
The method comparison of the Yumizen C1200 IgA (candidate device) assay and the predicate device was evaluated. A total of 129 remnant serum samples collected from blood bank covering the measuring range were tested and compared using the Passing-Bablok method. The results are summarized below:
K193525 - Page 13 of 16
{13}
| Parameter | Result |
| --- | --- |
| Range | 11–684 mg/dL (Predicate, X)
10–691 mg/dL (Assay, Y) |
| Slope (95^{th} CI) | 0.9941 (0.976–1.008) |
| Intercept (95^{th} CI) | 0.024 (0.001–0.052) |
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.997 |
**Yumizen C1200 IgG:**
The method comparison of the Yumizen C1200 IgG (candidate device) assay and the predicate device was evaluated. A total of 214 remnant serum samples collected from a blood bank covering the measuring range were tested and compared using the Passing-Bablok method. The results are summarized below:
| Parameter | Result |
| --- | --- |
| Range | 77–2979 mg/dL (Predicate, X)
96–2894 mg/dL (Assay, Y) |
| Slope (95^{th} CI) | 1.016 (1.000–1.033) |
| Intercept (95^{th} CI) | -0.163 (-0.364– -0.030) |
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.996 |
**Yumizen C1200 IgM:**
The method comparison of the Yumizen C1200 IgM (candidate device) assay and the predicate device was evaluated. A total of 153 remnant serum samples collected from a blood bank covering the measuring range were tested and compared using the Passing-Bablok method. The results are summarized below:
| Parameter | Result |
| --- | --- |
| Range | 28–448 mg/dL (Predicate, X)
25–441 mg/dL (Assay, Y) |
| Slope (95^{th} CI) | 1.005 (0.993–1.026) |
| Intercept (95^{th} CI) | 0.005 (-0.015–0.020) |
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.997 |
2. **Matrix Comparison:**
Serum and lithium heparin are indicated for all three assays.
**Yumizen C1200 IgA:**
For the Yumizen C1200 IgA assay, a study comparing 62 paired serum and lithium heparin plasma samples demonstrated equivalence between the matrices:
K193525 - Page 14 of 16
{14}
| Passing-Bablok Fit | N | Range (mg/dL) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | Pearson r |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Li-heparin vs. Serum | 62 | 23–646 | 0.97 (0.95–0.99) | -0.07 (-0.11– -0.04) | 0.997 |
Yumizen C1200 IgG:
For the Yumizen C1200 IgG assay, a study comparing 52 paired serum and lithium heparin plasma samples demonstrated equivalence between the matrices:
| Passing-Bablok Fit | N | Range (mg/dL) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | Pearson r |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Li-heparin vs. Serum | 52 | 205–2718 | 1.12 (1.08–1.15) | -0.84 (-1.28– -0.48) | 0.994 |
Yumizen C1200 IgM:
For the Yumizen C1200 IgM assay, a study comparing 44 paired serum and lithium heparin plasma samples demonstrated equivalence between the matrices:
| Passing-Bablok Fit | N | Range (mg/dL) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | Pearson r |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Li-heparin vs. Serum | 62 | 40–454 | 1.04 (1.02–1.06) | 0 (-0.02– 0.01) | 0.998 |
C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable.
D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
E Expected Values/Reference Range:
Yumizen C1200 IgA:
K193525 - Page 15 of 16
{15}
The IgA reference range cited in a reference¹ was verified. Samples (n=58, 22 female and 36 males) from a blood bank were used and the results validate a reference range of 70–400 mg/dL.
**Yumizen C1200 IgG:**
The IgG reference range cited in a reference¹ was verified. Samples (n=44, 16 female and 28 males) from a blood bank were used and the results validate a reference range of 700–1600 mg/dL.
**Yumizen C1200 IgM:**
The IgM reference ranges cited in a reference¹ was verified. Samples (n=74, 29 female and 45 males) from a blood bank were used and the results validate a reference range of 40–230 mg/dL.
---
**VIII Proposed Labeling:**
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
---
**IX Conclusion:**
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
---
¹ Dati F, Schumann G, Thomas L, Aguzzi F, Baudner S, Bienvenu J et al. Consensus of a group of professional societies and diagnostic companies on guidelines for interim reference ranges for 14 proteins in serum based on the standardization against the IFCC/BCR/CAP reference material (CRM470). Eur. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. (1996) 34: 517-20.
K193525 - Page 16 of 16
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.