K193307 · Brainlab AG · OLO · Jun 2, 2020 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K193307
Device Name
HIP7
Applicant
Brainlab AG
Product Code
OLO · Neurology
Decision Date
Jun 2, 2020
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.4560
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
HIP7 is intended to be an intraoperative image-guided localization system to enable minimally invasive surgery. It links a freehand probe, tracked by a passive marker sensor system, to virtual computer image space either on a patient's preoperative image data being processed by Brainlab IGS platforms, or on an individual 3D-model of the patient's bone, which is generated through acquiring multiple landmarks on the bone surface. The system is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be considered to be safe and effective, and where a reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as a long bone or vertebra, can be identified relative to a CT, X-Ray, or MR-based model of the anatomy. The system aids the surgeon to accurately navigate a hip endoprosthesis to the preoperatively or intraoperatively planned position. Example orthopedic surgical procedures for the Computer Assisted Total Hip Replacement – HIP7 use case include but are not limited to: - Total Joint Replacement - Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery
Device Story
Intraoperative image-guided localization system; links freehand probe tracked by passive marker sensor system to virtual computer image space. Inputs: preoperative image data or 3D-model of patient bone generated via landmark acquisition. Operation: system registers landmarks to navigate surgical tools (e.g., cup inserter) to planned positions; measures leg length and offset changes. Used in OR by surgeons for orthopedic procedures (e.g., total hip replacement). Output: 3D reconstruction of anatomical axes/planes, implant orientation, and leg length/offset parameters displayed on navigation station. Benefits: aids accurate implant navigation and alignment; enables minimally invasive approach.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Verification and validation performed according to Brainlab's design and development procedures. No clinical data presented.
Technological Characteristics
Stereotaxic instrument; infrared tracking with passive marker spheres. Compatible with various Brainlab navigation platforms (Kick, Curve, BUZZ). Software-based navigation of surgical tools. Connectivity via navigation station hardware. Sterilization: not specified (standard surgical instrument protocols apply).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring stereotactic surgery where a rigid anatomical structure (long bone or vertebra) can be referenced to CT, X-Ray, or MR-based models. Used for total joint replacement and minimally invasive orthopedic surgery.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services seal on the left and the FDA acronym followed by the full name of the agency on the right. The FDA part of the logo is in blue, with the acronym in a solid blue square and the agency name in a lighter blue. The text reads "FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION".
June 2, 2020
Brainlab AG % Cherita James Regulatory Consultant M Squared Associates Inc. 575 8th Ave Suite 1212 New York, New York 10018
Re: K193307
Trade/Device Name: Hip7 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4560 Regulation Name: Stereotaxic Instrument Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OLO Dated: April 1, 2020 Received: April 2, 2020
Dear Cherita James:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS)
regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Shumaya Ali, MPH Assistant Director DHT6C: Division of Restorative, Repair, and Trauma Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K193307
Device Name HIP7
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
HIP7 is intended to be an intraoperative image-guided localization system to enable minimally invasive surgery. It links a freehand probe, tracked by a passive marker sensor system, to virtual computer image space either on a patient's preoperative image data being processed by Brainlab IGS platforms, or on an individual 3D-model of the patient's bone, which is generated through acquiring multiple landmarks on the bone surface.
The system is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be considered to be safe and effective, and where a reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as a long bone or vertebra, can be identified relative to a CT, X-Ray, or MR-based model of the anatomy. The system aids the surgeon to accurately navigate a hip endoprosthesis to the preoperatively or intraoperatively planned position.
Example orthopedic surgical procedures for the Computer Assisted Total Hip Replacement – HIP7 use case include but are not limited to:
- · Total Joint Replacement
- · Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
| | |
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
The following information is provided as required by 21 CFR § 807.87 for Brainlab's HIP7 510(k) premarket notification. In response to the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, the following is a summary of the information upon which the substantial equivalence determination is based.
- Sponsor: Brainlab AG Olof-Palme-Str. 9 81829 Munich Germany Ph. +49 89 99 15 68 - 0 Fax. +49 89 99 15 68 - 5033 Contact: M Squared Associates, Inc. Cherita James 575 8th Ave, Suite 1212 New York, New York 10018 Ph. 347-954-0624 Fax. 703-562-9797 Date of Submission: March 26, 2020 Proprietary Name: HIP7 Common Name: Stereotaxic Instrument
| Regulatory Class: | Class II |
|----------------------|----------------------|
| Regulation: | 21 CFR 882.4560 |
| Product Codes: | OLO |
| Predicate Device(s): | K122011 Brainlab Hip |
The HIP7 system is intended to enable navigation in orthopedic hip replacement Device Description: surgery. It links a surgical instrument, tracked by flexible passive markers to virtual computer image space on an individual three-dimensional model of the patient's bone, which is generated through acquiring multiple landmarks on the bone surface or soft tissue. The HIP7 system uses the registered landmarks to navigate the necessary surgical tool, i.e., cup inserter, to the desired orientation. Additionally, it enables to intra-operatively measure the changes in leg length and offset.
The HIP7 system provides a three-dimensional reconstruction of the relevant anatomical axes and planes of the femur and pelvis to aid the alignment of the implants and to determine leg length and offset parameters. Based on the selected procedure, the HIP7 system loads implant and instrument data that has been provided by the implant manufacturer. The implant is selected according to the available license and is then shown in the software in relation to the determined anatomical structures. A preoperative x-ray may optionally me loaded. The HIP7 system does not require CT-based imaging.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use: HIP7 is intended to be an intraoperative image-guided localization system to enable minimally invasive surgery. It links a freehand probe, tracked by a passive marker sensor system, to virtual computer image space either on a patient's preoperative image data being processed by Brainlab IGS platforms, or on an individual 3D-model of the patient's bone, which is generated through acquiring multiple landmarks on the bone surface.
The system is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be considered to be safe and effective, and where a reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as a long bone or vertebra, can be identified relative to a CT, X-Ray, or MR-based model of the anatomy. The system aids the surgeon to accurately navigate a hip endoprosthesis to the preoperatively or intraoperatively planned position.
Example orthopedic surgical procedures include but are not limited to:
- Total Joint Replacement ●
- Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery ●
### SE Table
| Features/Technical<br>Information | Predicate device | New device | Substantial Equivalence |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Brainlab hip (Hip 6.0) | HIP7 | |
| 510(k) number | K122011 | - | - |
| Indication for Use | Total Hip Replacement<br>(THR) procedures The<br>Brainlab Hip system is<br>intended to be an<br>intraoperative image-<br>guided localization<br>system to enable<br>minimally invasive<br>surgery. It links a<br>freehand probe, tracked<br>by a passive marker<br>sensor system, to virtual<br>computer image space<br>either on a patient's<br>preoperative image data<br>being processed by<br>Brainlab IGS platforms,<br>or on an individual 3D-<br>model of the patient's<br>bone, which is generated<br>through acquiring<br>multiple landmarks on<br>the bone surface. The | HIP7 is intended to be an<br>intraoperative image-<br>guided localization<br>system to enable<br>minimally invasive<br>surgery. It links a<br>freehand probe, tracked<br>by a passive marker<br>sensor system, to virtual<br>computer image space<br>either on a patient's<br>preoperative image data<br>being processed by<br>Brainlab IGS platforms,<br>or on an individual 3D-<br>model of the patient's<br>bone, which is generated<br>through acquiring<br>multiple landmarks on<br>the bone surface.<br>The system is indicated<br>for any medical condition | Same indication for use<br>with limited intended<br>uses.<br>Difference does not<br>present new issues of<br>safety and effectiveness. |
| Features/Technical<br>Information | Predicate device<br>Brainlab hip (Hip 6.0) | New device<br>HIP7 | Substantial Equivalence |
| Intended Use | system is indicated for<br>any medical condition in<br>which the use of<br>stereotactic surgery may<br>be considered to be safe<br>and effective, and where<br>a reference to a rigid<br>anatomical structure,<br>such as the skull, a long<br>bone, or vertebra, can be<br>identified relative to a<br>CT, X-Ray, or MR-<br>based model of the<br>anatomy. The system<br>aids the surgeon to<br>accurately navigate a hip<br>endoprosthesis to the<br>preoperatively or<br>intraoperatively planned<br>position. Example<br>orthopedic surgical<br>procedures include but<br>are not limited to:<br>• Total Joint<br>Replacement<br>• Minimally<br>invasive<br>orthopedic<br>surgery<br>• Tumor<br>resection and<br>bone/joint<br>reconstruction<br>Surface Replacement<br>(SR) procedures | in which the use of<br>stereotactic surgery may<br>be considered to be safe<br>and effective, and where<br>a reference to a rigid<br>anatomical structure,<br>such as a long bone, or<br>vertebra, can be<br>identified relative to a<br>CT, X-Ray, or MR-based<br>model of the anatomy.<br>The system aids the<br>surgeon to accurately<br>navigate a hip<br>endoprosthesis to the<br>preoperatively or<br>intraoperatively planned<br>position.<br>Example orthopedic<br>surgical procedures<br>include but are not<br>limited to:<br>• Total Joint<br>Replacement<br>• Minimally<br>invasive<br>orthopedic<br>surgery<br>intraoperative image- | Tumor resection and<br>bone/joint reconstruction<br>and Surface replacement |
| | intraoperative image-<br>guided localization<br>system to enable | guided localization<br>system to enable | |
| Features/Technical<br>Information | Predicate device<br>Brainlab hip (Hip 6.0) | New device<br>HIP7 | Substantial Equivalence |
| | minimally invasive<br>surgery including:<br>Total Joint Replacement Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery Tumor resection and bone/joint reconstruction Surface Replacement procedures | minimally invasive<br>surgery including:<br>Total Joint Replacement Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery Tumor resection and<br>bone/joint reconstruction<br>and Surface replacement<br>procedures have been<br>excluded. | procedures have been<br>excluded.<br>Difference does not<br>present new issues of<br>safety and effectiveness. |
| Pelvis Registration | There is a pelvis<br>registration for supine<br>and one for lateral<br>patient position.<br>The ASIS-ASIS distance<br>is measured pre-<br>operatively with the<br>caliper. | The registration<br>procedures have been<br>modified:<br>- measurement of<br>ASIS-ASIS<br>distance<br>manually (with<br>caliper) or<br>digitally (on pre-<br>operative X-ray)<br>- elimination of<br>the acquisition of<br>one landmark<br>(anterior rim<br>point is now<br>constructed from<br>the calculated<br>acetabular<br>sphere) | Confirmed in verification<br>of device/system<br>performance.<br>Difference does not<br>present new issues of<br>safety and effectiveness. |
| Plausibility checks | Contains plausibility<br>checks | Plausibility checks were<br>removed (due to<br>eliminated features), | Difference does not<br>present new issues of<br>safety and effectiveness. |
| Features/Technical<br>Information | Predicate device | New device | Substantial Equivalence |
| | Brainlab hip (Hip 6.0) | HIP7 | |
| | | adjusted (tighter rules)<br>and added. | |
| Cup Navigation | Cup orientation values<br>(inclination,<br>anteversion) are<br>displayed in<br>combination with a<br>visualization of a pelvis<br>model and the navigated<br>implant.<br>When pelvic tilt was<br>entered via a control, the<br>inclination and<br>anteversion values to<br>both the anterior pelvic<br>plane (APP) and<br>functional plane are<br>shown next to each other<br>in the controls. The<br>pelvic tilt value is shown<br>on the screen. | Cup orientation values<br>(inclination, anteversion)<br>are displayed in<br>combination with a<br>visualization of a pelvis<br>model, the navigated<br>implant and the reference<br>planes.<br>When a pelvic tilt (PT)<br>value is available, the<br>inclination and<br>anteversion values to<br>both the anterior pelvic<br>plane (APP) and<br>functional plane are<br>displayed in individual<br>controls. PT can be<br>entered manually via<br>control or calculated<br>automatically if<br>appropriate pre-operative<br>planning data is available<br>(X-ray planned with<br>specific TraumaCad<br>measurement tool). The<br>PT value is shown on the<br>screen. | In addition to the manual<br>entry of the pelvic tilt, the<br>value can now also be<br>calculated automatically<br>if TraumaCad planning<br>data is available.<br>Acceptance criteria for<br>measuring inclination and<br>anteversion had been<br>defined for Hip 6.0.<br>Verification tests have<br>shown that these<br>acceptance criteria are<br>also met when inclination<br>and anteversion are<br>measured in relation to a<br>functional plane<br>(including automatic<br>calculation of pelvic tilt).<br>Difference does not<br>present new issues of<br>safety and effectiveness. |
| Leg Length &<br>Offset<br>Measurement | The global leg length<br>and offset change<br>(combined change<br>resulting from implanted<br>cup and stem) can be<br>measured<br>intraoperatively with<br>trial and final implants.<br>There are two options:<br>with a reference array<br>attached to the femur<br>with pins or with a | The global leg length and<br>offset change can be<br>measured<br>intraoperatively with trial<br>and final implants. There<br>is only one option: with a<br>reference array attached<br>to the lower thigh with<br>adhesive foil. | The functionality of the<br>remaining measurement<br>procedure is unchanged.<br>Difference does not<br>present new issues of<br>safety and effectiveness. |
| Features/Technical<br>Information | Predicate device | New device | Substantial Equivalence |
| | Brainlab hip (Hip 6.0) | HIP7 | |
| | reference array attached<br>to the lower thigh with<br>adhesive foil. | | |
| Compatible<br>platforms | - Kolibri<br>Navigation<br>Station 2.0<br>(Windows XP<br>SP 3) | - Kick (Windows<br>7 (64 Bit))* | Difference does not<br>present new issues of<br>safety and effectiveness |
| | - VectorVision<br>Compact<br>(Workstation 6<br>with Windows<br>XP SP 3) | - Kick 2 (with<br>Spectra and Vega<br>camera)<br>(Windows 8.1<br>(64 Bit))* | |
| | - VectorVision2<br>(Workstation 6<br>with Windows<br>XP SP 3) | - Curve (Windows<br>7 (64 Bit))* | |
| | - VectorVision<br>Sky<br>(Workstation 6<br>with Windows<br>XP SP 3) | - Curve Ceiling-<br>Mounted<br>(Windows 7 (64<br>Bit)) ** | |
| | - VectorVision<br>Flex<br>(Workstation 6<br>with Windows<br>XP SP 3) | - Curve 1.2 Dual<br>Navigation<br>Station<br>(Windows 8.1<br>(64 Bit))* | |
| | - Curve<br>(Windows 7 (64<br>Bit)) | - Curve 1.2.1 Dual<br>Navigation<br>Station<br>(Windows 10 (64<br>Bit))* | |
| | - Kick (Windows<br>7 (64 Bit))* | - BUZZ<br>Navigation<br>(Ceiling-<br>Mounted)<br>(Windows 10 (64<br>Bit))* | |
| | - Kick 2 (with<br>Spectra camera<br>only) (Windows<br>8.1 (64 Bit))* | All platforms marked<br>with * received FDA<br>clearance with K183605 | |
| | - Curve Ceiling-<br>Mounted | | |
| Features/Technical<br>Information | Predicate device | New device | Substantial Equivalence |
| Brainlab hip (Hip 6.0) | (Windows 7 (64 Bit))*<br>- Curve 1.2 Dual Navigation Station<br>(Windows 8.1 (64 Bit))*<br>* letter to file | HIP7<br>Spine & Trauma<br>Navigation.<br>The platform marked<br>with ** received FDA<br>clearance with K092467<br>Cranial Navigation. | |
| Compatible<br>instruments | Contains a large number<br>of compatible<br>instruments for allavailable workflow<br>steps.<br>See Hip and Knee<br>Instrument User Guide<br>of original submission | The list of compatible<br>instruments has been<br>reduced in accordance<br>with the features<br>removed.<br>The Bone Fixator 2-Pin<br>Flip Flop was added to<br>the list of compatible<br>instruments (received<br>FDA clearance with<br>K183605 Spine &<br>Trauma Navigation<br>System)<br>The following<br>instruments / accessories<br>have been added:<br>Cup Impactor Universal<br>Straight, Pin Driver<br>Adapter for AO<br>Coupling, KingMark<br>Calibration Device<br>See Section 8 Device<br>Description and<br>Appendix 11-1, 11-2<br>Instrument User Guide<br>Hip | New<br>instruments/accessories<br>have been verified to<br>perform as intended.<br>Difference does not<br>present new issues of<br>safety and effectiveness |
{5}------------------------------------------------
{6}------------------------------------------------
{7}------------------------------------------------
{8}------------------------------------------------
{9}------------------------------------------------
{10}------------------------------------------------
Similarities:
- same type of platform (computer, touchscreen, tracking camera) -
- same tracking technology (infrared tracking with passive marker spheres)
- most instruments are the same (available selection was reduced, four instruments / accessories added)
- workflows (available selection was only reduced)
- registration procedure and landmarks to be registered (required number of landmarks was only reduced)
- navigated values (inclination, anteversion; leg length (longer/shorter), offset (medial/lateral))
- content of GUI (displayed pictures) -
Differences:
- new GUI design
- optional use of data from pre-operatively planned X-ray for calculation of ASIS-ASIS distance
- optional use of data from pre-operatively planned X-ray for calculation of pelvic tilt
- compatibility to old platforms removed and compatibility to new platforms added (All compatible platforms have already received FDA clearance with the predicate device K122011, or with K183605 or K092467.)
- added Bone Fixator 2-Pin Flip Flop to list of compatible instruments (received FDA clearance with K183605 Spine & Trauma Navigation System)
- three new instruments / accessories
### Technological Characteristics and Substantial Equivalence
The HIP7 system has been verified and validated according to Brainlab's procedures for product design and development.
### Summary
The changes described above do not alter intended use or the fundamental scientific technology of the device because they do not change the operating principle. The changes to the HIP7 do not present any new issues of safety and effectiveness when compared to the predicate device.
The HIP7 system described in this submission is, in our opinion, substantially equivalent to the predicate.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.