The AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature.
Device Story
AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath is a variable stiffness percutaneous catheter; used to provide a reinforcing conduit for other intravascular devices. Device features stainless-steel mixed coil reinforcement (single and cross-coil), PTFE-lined lumen, and hydrophilic coating on distal 10 cm to reduce insertion force. Distal tip includes radiopaque Platinum/Iridium marker band for fluoroscopic visualization. Used in peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature. Operated by physicians in clinical settings. Device is inserted at vascular access point; provides stable pathway for interventional tools. Benefits include easier navigation through tortuous anatomy and reduced vessel trauma due to soft distal segments. Supplied sterile, single-use.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence supported by bench testing (biocompatibility, design verification, shelf-life, sterilization) and previously conducted animal testing from K172468. Bench testing included tensile strength, torque strength, burst pressure, leak testing, and kink resistance, all meeting pre-determined acceptance criteria.
Technological Characteristics
Catheter with PTFE inner liner, stainless-steel mixed coil reinforcement, and polymer jacket (PEBAX/Chronoflex). Proximal hub: polycarbonate. Distal tip: radiopaque Platinum/Iridium marker. Hydrophilic coating. Dimensions: 0.091" ID, 0.109" average OD. Lengths: 70, 80, 90 cm. Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature in patients requiring such access.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logos of the Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health and Human Services logo is on the left, and the FDA logo is on the right. The FDA logo includes the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
November 29, 2019
Stryker Neurovascular Shivani Patel Senior Staff Regulatory Affairs Specialist 47900 Bayside Parkway Fremont, California 94538
Re: K193034
Trade/Device Name: AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250 Regulation Name: Percutaneous Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DQY Dated: October 30, 2019 Received: October 31, 2019
Dear Shivani Patel:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Xiaolin Zheng, Ph.D. Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K193034
Device Name AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath
Indications for Use (Describe)
The AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) Summary (K193034)
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.
#### Introduction:
According to the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92, the following information provides sufficient details to understand the basis for a determination of substantial equivalence.
#### Submitter Name, Address, and Content:
| Submitter: | Stryker Neurovascular<br>47900 Bayside Parkway<br>Fremont, CA 94538-6515<br>(FDA Registration Number: 3008853977) | |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| Contact: | Shivani Patel<br>Senior Staff Regulatory Affairs Specialist<br>Phone: 510-413-2772<br>Email: shivani.patel2@stryker.com | |
| Date Prepared: | November 27, 2019 | |
| Device Name and Classification: | | |
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | AXS Infinity LS™ Plus Long Sheath | |
| Common Name: | Percutaneous Catheter | |
Classification Name: Catheter, Percutaneous
- Classification Regulation: 21CFR 870.1250
Class: Class II
Product Code: DQY
{4}------------------------------------------------
## Legally Marketed Predicate Device:
| Table 5-1: Legally Marketed Predicate Device | | |
|----------------------------------------------|--------------------------|---------------|
| Name of Predicate<br>Device | Name of<br>Manufacturer | 510(k) Number |
| AXS Infinity LSTM Plus<br>Long Sheath | Stryker<br>Neurovascular | K172468 |
#### Device Description:
The AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath is a variable stiffness catheter that has a catheter shaft reinforced with a stainless-steel mixed coil design (single wind and cross coil wind). It has a radiopaque Platinum/Iridium marker band on the distal end. The distal 10 cm of the AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath has a hydrophilic coating which reduces the insertion force and allows the catheter to traverse the vasculature more easily. The catheter has a maximum average outer diameter of 0.109", where no point is > 0.112" and a nominal inner diameter of 0.091". It is available in three working lengths: 70 cm, 80 cm, and 90 cm. The AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath has a PTFElined lumen. The AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath is inserted at a vascular access point to provide access to the target site and once in place, provides a reinforcing conduit for other intravascular devices. Accessories included with the device are a Tuohy-Borst Hemostasis Valve and a Vessel Dilator. The accessories are identical to those in the previous clearance (K172468). The AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath is supplied sterile, non-pyrogenic, and intended for single use only.
{5}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
The AXS Infinity LS™ Plus Long Sheath is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature.
#### Technological Characteristics and Product Feature Comparison
The AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath is composed of a PTFE inner liner, a reinforcing stainless-steel single and cross-coil wind middle layer, and a polymer jacket outer layer. A polycarbonate Luer hub is bonded onto the proximal end. The device features segmented, progressively softer distal segments with a soft tip, designed to minimize vessel trauma, which contains a radiopaque platinum iridium marker band to provide visualization by fluoroscope. Stryker Neurovascular has demonstrated that the AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath (modified) is substantially equivalent to the Predicate device (K172468), based on same or similar materials, same intended use, similar design and the same fundamental operating principles. A comparison of the Subject device with the Predicate device is summarized in Table 5-2, below.
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Table 5-2: Product Feature Comparison of Subject Device to Predicate Device | | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Detail | Submission Subject<br>Device<br>AXS Infinity LS Plus Long<br>Sheath | Predicate Device<br>AXS Infinity LS Plus Long<br>Sheath |
| Legal Manufacturer | Stryker Neurovascular | Same |
| 510(k) Number | K193034 | K172468 |
| Device Trade Name | AXS Infinity LS Plus Long<br>Sheath | Same |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 870.1250 | Same |
| Regulation Name | Percutaneous Catheter | Same |
| Classification | II | Same |
| Product Code | DQY | Same |
| Intended Use/Indication<br>for Use | The AXS Infinity LS Plus<br>Long Sheath is indicated for<br>the introduction of<br>interventional devices into<br>the peripheral, coronary and<br>neuro vasculature. | Same |
| Components Supplied | Sheath, Vessel Dilator,<br>Hemostasis Valve | Same |
| Catheter Distal and<br>Mid-Shaft Material | Polyether Block Amide<br>(PEBAX) and Chronoflex | Same |
| Proximal Shaft Material | Coextrusion of Grilamid (outer<br>layer) and Pebax 55D (inner<br>layer) | Single extrusion of Vestamid |
| Catheter Shaft<br>Reinforcement | Mixed Coil Winding (Single<br>and cross coil) | Cross-Coil winding |
| Adhesive | Adhesive with light cure<br>process | Adhesive with humidity cure<br>process |
| Inner Liner | PTFE | Same |
| Hub Material | Polycarbonate | Same |
| Strain Relief | Polyolefin | Same |
| Lubricious Coating | Harland Hydrophilic Coating | Same |
| Radiopaque Marker<br>Band | Platinum/Iridium | Same |
| Packaging | Tyvek/Nylon Pouch,<br>polyethylene support tube | Same |
| Table 5-2: Product Feature Comparison of Subject Device to Predicate Device | | |
| Detail | Submission Subject<br>Device<br>AXS Infinity LS Plus Long<br>Sheath | Predicate Device<br>AXS Infinity LS Plus Long<br>Sheath |
| | packaging card, SBS Carton | |
| Sterilization | Ethylene Oxide | Same |
| Pyrogenicity | Nonpyrogenic | Same |
| Working Lengths | 70, 80, 90 cm | Same |
| Internal Diameter | 0.91 in | Same |
| Outer Diameter | .109 | Same |
| Accessories | Tuohy-Borst Hemostasis Valve Vessel Dilator | Same |
{7}------------------------------------------------
## Risk Assessment
A Risk Assessment of the AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath with design changes has been conducted in accordance with EN ISO 14971:2012 Medical devices- Application of risk management to medical devices. Based on the similarity in design and identical intended use of the AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath, the same risk and risk mitigation activities were applied. There were no changes in functionality. Additionally, a risk analysis was conducted at several points throughout the design process and documented throughout the process in updates to the DHF, and where necessary, updates to risk documentation. An impact assessment was also performed to analyze the effect of the proposed modifications to the existing AXS Infinity LS Plus Long
{8}------------------------------------------------
Sheath. Results of testing are appropriate for determining that the AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed Predicate device.
## Summary of Non-Clinical Data
Testing was conducted for the specifications that were impacted by the changes to the AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath: Proximal shaft material (coextrusion); mixed coil winding pattern and pitch; modifications to the wall thickness and lengths of different polymer sections along the catheter shaft; modification to the outer diameter and use of a different adhesive to secure the marker band. Summary descriptions of the testing, which substantiates the safe and effective performance of the subject device and its substantial equivalence to the Predicate device is provided below.
- . Biocompatibility
- Design Verification (Benchtop Testing) ●
- Sterilization .
- . Design Validation (Simulated-Use Testing)
## Biocompatibility
Biocompatibility testing was conducted on the Subject device, the modified AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath. The studies were selected in accordance with ISO 10993-1:2018 guidelines, based on the classification as an External Communication Device used within the circulating blood for a limited (<24 hour) duration. The results of biocompatibility testing are presented below:
| Table 5-3: Summary of Biocompatibility Test Results | | | |
|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| # | Tests | Acceptance Criteria | Results<br>(Pass/Fail/Other) |
| 1 | MEM elution, 48<br>hr. inc., triplicate<br>L929, 24 hr. ext.<br>(non-implant) | Replicate results from negative and<br>media controls must all receive a in.<br>2in. reactive grade and replicate<br>positive controls must all receive a 3-4<br>reactivity grade. | Pass.<br>All test method acceptance criteria<br>were met. No cytotoxicity or cell<br>lysis,<br>Score: 0 |
| Table 5-3: Summary of Biocompatibility Test Results | | | |
| # | Tests | Acceptance Criteria | Results<br>(Pass/Fail/Other) |
| 2 | Magnusson-<br>Kligman Method,<br>2 extracts | Replicate results from negative and<br>media controls must all receive a in.<br>2in. reactive grade and replicate<br>positive controls must all receive a 3-4<br>reactivity grade | Pass.<br>The USP 0.9% Sodium Chloride for<br>injection (NaCl) and Cottonseed Oil<br>(CSO) extracts of the test article<br>elicited no reaction at the challenge<br>(0% sensitization), following an<br>induction phase. The test article is<br>classified as a non-sensitizer. |
| 3 | Intracutaneous<br>Toxicity (ISO),<br>2 extracts | The test article extracts must not<br>produce a significantly greater<br>biological reaction than the control. | Pass.<br>The test article (device) sites did not<br>show a significantly greater<br>biological reaction than the sites<br>injected with the control article. |
| 4 | Material Mediated<br>Pyrogen | The test article extract must not<br>produce a pyrogenic response. | Pass.<br>The test article (device) is<br>considered non-pyrogenic. |
| 5 | Systemic Injection<br>(ISO), 2 extracts | The test article extracts must not<br>produce a significantly greater<br>biological reaction than the control. | Pass.<br>The test article (device) extracts did<br>not cause acute adverse effects<br>under the conditions of this assay. |
| 6 | Hemolysis, ASTM<br>Method, indirect<br>contact (human<br>blood) | The negative control must produce a<br>corrected hemolytic index of less than<br>2%. The positive control must produce<br>a corrected hemolytic index of greater<br>than 5% above the negative control.<br>The hemolytic index of the test article<br>must be rated 0-2 (Non-Hemolytic)<br>when corrected with a negative control. | Pass.<br>The difference between the<br>hemolytic indexes of the test article<br>and the negative control is 0.00<br>percent for direct contact, and 0.44<br>for extract; this places the test<br>article in the non-hemolytic range. |
| 7 | Hemolysis, ASTM<br>Method, direct<br>contact (human<br>blood) | The concentration of SC5b-9 in the test<br>article should be comparable to the<br>predicate and the negative control. | |
| Table 5-3: Summary of Biocompatibility Test Results | | | |
| # | Tests | Acceptance Criteria | Results<br>(Pass/Fail/Other) |
| 8 | Complement<br>Activation, SC5b-<br>9 | Clotting times are evaluated using<br>analysis of variance and compared to<br>the clotting time of the negative control.<br>When a predicate product is tested, the<br>results of the test article are compared<br>to predicate values. | Pass.<br>The SCb5-9 results for the test<br>article were statistically similar to<br>the predicate device after 30<br>minutes exposure and only<br>marginally higher than the predicate<br>device for 60 and 90 minutes<br>exposure.<br>The SCb5-9 results for the test<br>article were statistically similar to<br>the negative control after 30- and<br>90-minutes exposure and only<br>marginally higher than the negative<br>control following 60 minutes<br>exposure. |
| 9 | Partial<br>Thromboplastin<br>Time (PTT),<br>Human Plasma | Clotting times are evaluated using<br>analysis of variance and compared to<br>the clotting time of the negative control.<br>When a predicate product is tested, the<br>results of the test article are compared<br>to predicate values. The positive<br>control should show a significantly<br>shortened clotting time when compared<br>to the negative control. A p value of<br>less than 0.050 demonstrates a<br>statistically significant difference. | Pass.<br>The average clotting time for the<br>test article was compared to the<br>predicate and negative control and<br>was deemed similar when p values<br>of clotting times were compared.<br>Hence, this result is considered<br>acceptable |
| 10 | Dog<br>Thrombogenicity | The thrombogenic potential of test<br>article will be comparable or less than<br>the Predicate device. | Pass. The test article thrombogenic<br>potential was less than and<br>comparable to the Predicate device. |
{9}------------------------------------------------
{10}------------------------------------------------
{11}------------------------------------------------
## Design Verification-Bench Testing
Performance testing was conducted to demonstrate substantial equivalence between the Subject device, AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath (modified), and the currently cleared AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath (Predicate device). The tests were performed using standard test methods and pre-determined acceptance criteria, and all samples passed. Therefore, the data provided herein supports the argument that the AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath has similar performance characteristics as the Predicate device. The packaging and accessories are unchanged from the predicate device and no additional testing was needed. All the testing conducted to demonstrate equivalence is presented in Table 5-4, which follows.
| Table 5-4: Summary of Design Verification (Bench Testing) | | | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Design Requirement/<br>Test Name | | Acceptance Criteria | Results |
| 7 | Tensile Strength | Peak tensile force shall be<br>$\geq$ 15N at all joints | Pass.<br>Two deviations were identified. The<br>deviations did not impact the outcome<br>of Tensile Strength testing. Refer to the<br>summary of the deviations provided<br>below. In all cases, the 90/95<br>confidence/reliability was higher than<br>the specification of 15N. |
| 7 | PTFE<br>Delamination | PTFE liner shall not<br>delaminate. Any observed<br>delamination within 1 mm<br>of the cut is not considered<br>a failure. | Pass.<br>All samples did not exhibit any PTFE<br>delamination. |
| 7 | Torque Strength | Catheter shall withstand at<br>least one 360 degree turn<br>of the hub | Pass.<br>A reliability analysis was completed at<br>85% reliability and 95% confidence<br>(8.50 turns minimum torque strength). |
| Table 5-4: Summary of Design Verification (Bench Testing) | | | |
| Design Requirement/<br>Test Name | Acceptance Criteria | Results | |
| 8 | Catheter Burst | Product shall not burst<br>below 44 psi | Pass.<br>The minimum catheter burst pressure<br>recorded was 119.7 psi. In addition, the<br>85%/95% lower bound value at 117.28<br>psi is greater than the lower<br>specification limit of 44 psi. |
| 10 | Leak (Liquid) | No liquid leaking from hub<br>and catheter shaft at<br>44 psi for 30 second<br>duration | Pass.<br>All units passed the liquid leak test. |
| 10 | Leak (Air) | No air shall leak into the<br>catheter assembly during<br>manual aspiration | Pass.<br>All units passed air leakage testing. |
| 11, 12,<br>17 | Catheter<br>Dimensional<br>Testing (ID, OD,<br>and Working<br>Lengths) | The ID of the catheters<br>shall be ≥ 0.090" | Pass.<br>95% confidence lower bound is<br>0.0914". which is greater than the lower<br>specification limit of 0.090". |
| | | The average OD of the<br>catheter shall be ≤ 0.110"<br>over the length of the<br>catheter where no point<br>measured shall be ><br>0.112" maximum | Pass.<br>The average OD, the 95% confidence,<br>90% reliability upper bound is<br>0.109886" which is less than 0.110".<br>For max OD, the 95% confidence, 90%<br>reliability upper bound is 0.0110" which<br>is less than 0.112" , max OD. |
| | | The catheter working<br>length shall be within 2 cm<br>of nominal | Pass.<br>For catheter working length, the 95%<br>confidence, 90% reliability lower bound<br>is 89.72 cm and the upper bound is<br>90.23 cm, which is within 2 cm of<br>nominal (90 cm). |
| 13 | Chemical<br>Compatibility | Product shall withstand<br>exposure to the following<br>chemicals without<br>degradation:<br>• Saline<br>• Dextrose<br>• Heparin | Pass.<br>All units passed chemical compatibility. |
| Table 5-4: Summary of Design Verification (Bench Testing) | | | |
| Design Requirement/<br>Test Name | | Acceptance Criteria | Results |
| | | Contrast | |
| 17 | Kink Resistance | The kink resistance shall be:<br>≤ 0.215" at the distal most material ≤ 2" at the proximal most material | Pass.<br>All units passed kink resistance. |
| 17 &<br>18 | Visual Inspection<br>(Transitions and<br>Tip) | The catheter shall have progressively lower durometer moving from proximal end to distal tip with smooth transition points to facilitate navigation through tortuous vascular anatomy.<br>-The catheter's distal tip shall be visibly tapered | Pass.<br>Units were inspected for smooth transitions and rounded tip. All units met the acceptance criteria and passed the transitions and tip visual inspection. |
{12}------------------------------------------------
{13}------------------------------------------------
{14}------------------------------------------------
## Shelf Life
Performance testing was conducted to demonstrate that the Subject device maintains functionality throughout the 3-year shelf life. The tests were performed using standard test methods and pre-determined acceptance criteria, and all samples passed. Therefore, the data provided herein supports the argument that the AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath has similar performance characteristics as the Predicate device. All the testing conducted to demonstrate equivalence is presented in Table 5-5, which follows.
| Table 5-5: Summary of 3-Year Accelerated Aging | | | |
|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Design Requirement/<br>Test Name | Acceptance Criteria | Results |
| 7 | Tensile Strength | Peak tensile force shall be<br>$≥$ 15N at all joints | Pass.<br>All samples had a peak tensile force of<br>less than 15N. |
| 7 | PTFE<br>Delamination | PTFE liner shall not<br>delaminate. Any observed<br>delamination within 1 mm<br>of the cut is not considered<br>a failure. | Pass.<br>All samples did not exhibit any PTFE<br>delamination. |
| 7 | Torque Strength | Catheter shall withstand at<br>least one 360 degree turn<br>of the hub | Pass.<br>All samples withstood at least one 360<br>degree turn of the hub. |
| 8 | Catheter Burst | Product shall not burst<br>below 44 psi | Pass.<br>All samples had a burst rate greater<br>than the lower specification limit of 44<br>psi. |
| 10 | Leak (Liquid) | No liquid leaking from hub<br>and catheter shaft at<br>44 psi for 30 second<br>duration | Pass.<br>All units passed the liquid leak test. |
| Table 5-5: Summary of 3-Year Accelerated Aging | | | |
| | Design Requirement/<br>Test Name | Acceptance Criteria | Results |
| 10 | Leak (Air) | No air shall leak into the<br>catheter assembly during<br>manual aspiration | Pass.<br>All units passed air leakage testing. |
| 11, 12,<br>17 | Catheter<br>Dimensional<br>Testing (ID, OD,<br>and Working<br>Lengths) | The ID of the catheters<br>shall be ≥ 0.090" | Pass.<br>The ID of all catheters was greater than<br>the lower specification limit of 0.090". |
| | | The average OD of the<br>catheter shall be ≤ 0.110"<br>over the length of the<br>catheter where no point<br>measured shall be ><br>0.112" maximum | Pass.<br>The average OD of all catheters was<br>less than 0.110".<br>The max OD of all catheters was less<br>than 0.112". |
| | | The catheter working<br>length shall be within 2 cm<br>of nominal | Pass.<br>The working length of all catheters was<br>within 2 cm of nominal. |
| 17 | Kink Resistance | The kink resistance shall<br>be:<br>• ≤ 0.215" at the<br>distal most material<br>• ≤ 2" at the proximal<br>most material | Pass.<br>All units passed kink resistance. |
| 17 &<br>18 | Visual Inspection<br>(Transitions and<br>Tip) | The catheter shall have<br>progressively lower<br>durometer moving from<br>proximal end to distal tip<br>with smooth transition<br>points to facilitate<br>navigation through<br>tortuous vascular anatomy.<br>-The catheter's distal tip<br>shall be visibly tapered | Pass.<br>Units were inspected for smooth<br>transitions and rounded tip. All units<br>met the acceptance criteria and passed<br>the transitions and tip visual inspection. |
{15}------------------------------------------------
{16}------------------------------------------------
## Sterilization
Testing was conducted to assess the impact of the proposed design and process changes on sterilization which included Bioburden, EO Residuals and Pyrogenicity testing. Results confirmed there was no adverse impact due to the proposed changes, Refer to Table 5-6, below, for a summary of sterilization testing results.
| Table 5-6: Summary of Sterilization Testing Results | | |
|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|
| Test Name | Acceptance Criteria | Results |
| EO Residuals<br>Testing | The total EO content of the AXS<br>Infinity LS Plus was no more<br>than 4 mg and the ECH level no<br>more than 9 mg following 12<br>hours heated aeration for 1X<br>product and 2X product | Pass. |
| Bioburden<br>Testing | The average corrected<br>bioburden count should be less<br>than 111 CFU/ product<br>unit. The types/groupings of<br>microorganisms present in the<br>bioburden should be similar to<br>those observed with the exiting<br>products. | Pass. |
| LAL Testing | LAL results were < 2.15 EU/<br>device (0.06 EU/ml) | Pass. |
# Design Validation- Simulated-Use Testing
The modified AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath (Subject device) was evaluated through simulated use testing using standard bench top models which included tortuosity of worst-case pathways in which the AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath would traverse. The modified AXS Infinity LS Plus Long sheath met all relevant user needs.
{17}------------------------------------------------
## Performance Data- Animal Testing
Animal testing previously conducted for the AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath was used to support the changes to the AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath. Prior to design changes, Simulated Use- Animal Testing was performed to support the previously cleared AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath and can be found in K172468 (cleared as 091 Long Sheath). Additional testing was not performed because the proposed design changes do not impact the overall safety and efficacy of the device.
## Performance Data - Clinical
No clinical study was conducted as bench testing and previously performed animal testing was determined to be sufficient for verification and validation purposes.
# Summary of Substantial Equivalence
Stryker Neurovascular has demonstrated the AXS Infinity LS™ Plus Long Sheath is substantially equivalent to the Predicate device, AXS Infinity LS Plus Long Sheath (K172468), based on same intended use / indications for use, same or similar materials, same fundamental design, and the same operating principles. The conclusions drawn from risk assessments and the bench testing conducted using the Subject device demonstrate that the Subject device is suitable for the indication for use. Additionally, the testing results summarized above along with the risk assessment demonstrate that the benefits of the device outweigh any residual risks when used in accordance with device Instructions for Use.
Stryker Neurovascular has demonstrated that the AXS Infinity LS™ Plus Long Sheath is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the legally marketed Predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.