K191961 · Tissue Regeneration Technologies · PZL · Nov 26, 2019 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K191961
Device Name
OrthoGold
Applicant
Tissue Regeneration Technologies
Product Code
PZL · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Nov 26, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4685
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K191961 · Nov 26, 2019
OrthoGold
Tissue Regeneration Technologies
Published clinical literature
A systematic literature review of clinical studies using the OrthoGold technology was used to support the efficacy and safety of the device for the treatment of chronic, full-thickness diabetic foot ulcers.
Literature review; Diabetic foot ulcers; Clinical efficacy
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Literature review of OrthoGold technology; Systematic literature review
Complete wound healing and reduction of wound area
Indications for Use
The OrthoGold 100™ is indicated to provide acoustic pressure shockwaves in the treatment of chronic, full-thickness diabetic foot ulcers with wound areas measuring no larger than 16 cm2, which extend through the epidermis, dermis, tendon, or capsule, but without bone exposure. The OrthoGold 100 is indicated for adult (22 years and older), diabetic patients presenting with diabetic foot ulcers greater than 30 days in duration and is indicated for use in conjunction with standard diabetic ulcer care.
Device Story
OrthoGold 100 is a pulsed acoustic wave device; generates transient compressed air via electrically powered generator; creates acoustic waves propagated through water-filled coupling membrane; hand-held applicator reflects waves toward treatment area via silicone membrane and ultrasound transmission gel. Used in clinical settings by healthcare providers to treat chronic diabetic foot ulcers. Device delivers unfocused pressure pulses to wound site; intended to promote wound healing and reduction of wound area. Benefits include improved healing outcomes for chronic ulcers. Output is acoustic energy; provider monitors wound progress clinically.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical evidence based on systematic literature review of 224 diabetic foot ulcers treated with OrthoGold technology. Studies reported significant results in complete wound healing and reduction of wound area. Safety profile supported by lack of reported adverse events in reviewed literature.
Technological Characteristics
Pulsed acoustic wave device; electro-hydraulic spark gap generation under water via high-voltage condenser discharge. Features hand-held applicator with silicone membrane and ultrasound transmission gel. Operating parameters: 1-8 Hz pulse repeat rate, 300-1300 pulses per treatment, 1-16 intensity settings. Continuous operating mode. Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility verified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for adult (22+ years) diabetic patients with chronic, full-thickness diabetic foot ulcers (>30 days duration) measuring ≤16 cm2, extending through epidermis, dermis, tendon, or capsule, without bone exposure. Used with standard ulcer care.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An extracorporeal shock wave device for treatment of chronic wounds is a prescription device that focuses acoustic shock waves onto the dermal tissue. The shock waves are generated inside the device and transferred to the body using an acoustic interface.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) Non-clinical performance testing must be conducted to demonstrate that the system produces anticipated and reproducible acoustic pressure shock waves.
(2) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(3) Performance data must demonstrate that the reusable components of the device can be reprocessed for subsequent use.
(4) Performance data must be provided to demonstrate the electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety of the device.
(5) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
(6) Performance data must support the use life of the system by demonstrating continued system functionality over the labeled use life.
(7) Physician labeling must include:
(i) Information on how the device operates and the typical course of treatment;
(ii) A detailed summary of the device's technical parameters;
(iii) Validated methods and instructions for reprocessing of any reusable components; and
(iv) Instructions for preventing hearing loss by use of hearing protection.
(8) Patient labeling must include:
(i) Relevant contraindications, warnings, precautions, adverse effects, and complications;
(ii) Information on how the device operates and the typical course of treatment;
(iii) The probable risks and benefits associated with the use of the device;
(iv) Post-procedure care instructions; and
(v) Alternative treatments.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health and Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
November 26, 2019
Tissue Regeneration Technologies LLC % Jennifer Daudelin Regulatory Consultant III M Squared Associates, Inc 575 Eight Avenue, St. Suite 1212 New York, New York 10018
Re: K191961
Trade/Device Name: OrthoGold Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4685 Regulation Name: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Device for Treatment of Chronic Wounds Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PZL Dated: October 28, 2019 Received: October 29, 2019
Dear Jennifer Daudelin:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Long Chen Assistant Director DHT4A: Division of General Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name OrthoGold 100
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The OrthoGold 100™ is indicated to provide acoustic pressure shockwaves in the treatment of chronic, full-thickness diabetic foot ulcers with wound areas measuring no larger than 16 cm2, which extend through the epidermis, dermis, tendon, or capsule, but without bone exposure. The OrthoGold 100 is indicated for adult (22 years and older), diabetic patients presenting with diabetic foot ulcers greater than 30 days in duration and is indicated for use in conjunction with standard diabetic ulcer care.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div style="display:flex; align-items:center;"><span style="font-size: 1.2em; margin-right: 0.2em;"> </span>Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)</div> | <div style="display:flex; align-items:center;"><span style="font-size: 1.2em; margin-right: 0.2em;"> </span>Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)</div> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Section 5: 510(k) Summary
# K191961
The following information is provided as required by 21 CFR § 807.87 for the Tissue Regeneration Technologies, LLC 510(k) premarket notification. In response to the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, the following is a summary of the safety and effectiveness information upon which the substantial equivalence determination is based.
The safety and effectiveness of the OrthoGold 100™ is based upon a determination of the substantial equivalence as well as the safety and effectiveness of its predicate device(s).
| Sponsor: | Tissue Regeneration Technologies, LLC<br>251 Heritage Walk<br>Woodstock, GA 30188 | | | |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------|-------|
| Contact: | Jennifer A. Daudelin, M.S.J.<br>M Squared Associates, Inc.<br>575 Eighth Avenue, Suite 1212<br>New York, NY 10018<br>Ph: 703-562-9800 x251<br>Fax: 703-562-9797<br>Email: jdaudelin@msquaredassociates.com | | | |
| Date Prepared: | November 25, 2019 | | | |
| Proposed Class: | II | | | |
| Proprietary Name: | OrthoGold 100TM | | | |
| Common Name: | Extracorporeal shock wave device for treatment of chronic wounds | | | |
| Classification Name: | Extracorporeal shock wave device for treatment of chronic wounds | | | |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 878.4685 | | | |
| Product Codes: | PZL | | | |
| Predicate Device(s): | | | | |
| Manufacturer | Device Name | 510(k) Number | Procode | Class |
| Sanuwave, Inc. | dermaPACE System | DEN160037 | PZL | II |
| Reference Device:<br>Tissue Regeneration<br>Technologies, LLC | OrthoGold 100TM | K182682 | ISA | I |
{4}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
The OrthoGold 100™ is indicated to provide acoustic pressure shockwaves in the treatment of chronic, full-thickness diabetic foot ulcers with wound areas measuring no larger than 16 cm2, which extend through the epidermis, dermis, tendon, or capsule, but without bone exposure. The OrthoGold 100 is indicated for adult (22 years and older), diabetic patients presenting with diabetic foot ulcers greater than 30 days in duration and is indicated for use in conjunction with standard diabetic ulcer care.
### Device Description
The OrthoGold 100™ is a pulsed acoustic wave device. It includes an electrically powered generator to generate transient compressed air that rapidly expands to create the acoustic waves, which in turn are propagated through a water-filled coupling membrane attached to the hand-held applicator. The hand-held applicator reflects the acoustic waves towards the treatment area through a silicone membrane and ultrasound transmission gel.
### Performance Data – Non-Clinical
The OrthoGold 100™ has been evaluated through non-clinical performance testing. The OrthoGold 100™ was tested for electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility and pressure field measurements. In addition, probe cover testing and transport verification and validation was The testing demonstrated that the OrthoGold 100™ met performance also conducted. requirements and is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
| Product<br>Characteristic | Subject Device<br>OrthoGold 100 | Reference<br>Predicate<br>OrthoGold 100 | Primary Predicate Device<br>dermaPACE System | Comparison |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| 510(k) Number | To be assigned | K182682 | DEN160037 | NA |
| Indications for<br>Use | Intended for treatment of<br>chronic, full-thickness<br>diabetic foot ulcers with<br>wound areas measuring no<br>larger than 16 cm2, which<br>extend through the<br>epidermis, dermis, tendon,<br>or capsule, but without<br>bone exposure. The<br>OrthoGold 100 is | Activation of<br>connective<br>tissue | Intended for the treatment of<br>chronic, full-thickness diabetic foot<br>ulcers with wound areas measuring<br>no larger than 16 cm2, which<br>extend through the epidermis,<br>dermis, tendon, or capsule, but<br>without bone exposure. The<br>dermaPACE System is indicated for<br>adult (22 years and older), diabetic<br>patients presenting with diabetic | Identical |
The table below compares the OrthoGold 100 characteristics to the predicate devices.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Product<br>Characteristic | Subject Device<br>OrthoGold 100 | Reference<br>Predicate<br>OrthoGold 100 | Primary Predicate Device<br>dermaPACE System | Comparison |
|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| | indicated for adult (22<br>years and older), diabetic<br>patients presenting with<br>diabetic foot ulcers greater<br>than 30 days in duration<br>and is indicated for use in<br>conjunction with standard<br>diabetic ulcer care. | | foot ulcers greater than 30 days in<br>duration and is indicated for use in<br>conjunction with standard diabetic<br>ulcer care. | |
| Modes of Action | Unfocused pressure pulses | | Focused pressure | Similar |
| Mechanisms of<br>Action | Extracorporeally induced unfocused pressure<br>pulses | | Extracorporeally induced focused<br>pressure pulses | Similar |
| Maximum and<br>Minimum<br>intensity settings | 1 to 16 | | 1 to 6 | Similar |
| Number and size<br>of treatment<br>applicator heads | OP155<br>Size: 230 x ø 70 mm | | 1 applicator (size not available) | Similar |
| Operating mode | Continuous | | Continuous | Similar |
| Pulse repeat rate<br>(1/s) | 1 - 8 Hz | | 1-4 Hz | Similar |
| Number of pulses<br>(min and max) | 300 - 1300 | | 500 to Specific Value Not<br>Available | Similar |
| Maximum<br>operating<br>temperature | Room temperature | | Specific Value Not Available | Similar |
| Type of acoustic<br>wave generation | Electro hydraulic, spark gap under water<br>caused by discharge of high voltage<br>condensers | | Electro hydraulic, spark gap under<br>water caused by discharge of high<br>voltage condensers | Similar |
## Performance Data - Clinical
A literature review represents the published literature with the subject device through systematic, comprehensive literature searches and those articles known to the manufacturer. These studies demonstrate the successful clinical use with the OrthoGold technology in 224 diabetic foot ulcers. The studies show significant results in complete wound healing and reduction of wound area. The data from these studies establish the efficacy of the subject device to treat chronic, full-thickness diabetic foot ulcers with wound areas measuring no larger than 16 cm2, which extend through the epidermis, dermis, tendon, or capsule, but without bone exposure and the safety of the device as shown with the lack of adverse events.
{6}------------------------------------------------
## Substantial Equivalence
The OrthoGold 100™ has the same indications for use and similar design features as compared with the predicate systems. The bench testing and clinical data demonstrates that the performance characteristics of the OrthoGold 100™ are equivalent to those of the other legally marketed extracorporeal shock wave devices, and therefore supports a determination of Substantial Equivalence for the proposed indications for use. Different questions of safety and effectiveness were not raised between the subject and predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.