ADVIA Centaur Zika test, ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab (100 tests), ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM (50 tests), ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab Quality Control, ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM Quality Control
Applicant
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc.
Product Code
QFO · Microbiology
Decision Date
Jul 17, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3935
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The ADVIA Centaur Zika test is for in vitro diagnostic use in the qualitative detection of IgM antibodies to the Zika virus in human serum and plasma (potassium EDTA or lithium heparin) specimens using the ADVIA Centaur XP and ADVIA Centaur XPT systems. The ADVIA Centaur Zika test is intended for the presumptive clinical laboratory diagnosis of Zika virus infection. The test is intended for use only in individuals (children, adolescents and adults, including pregnant women) with clinical signs and symptoms consistent with Zika virus infection, and/or meeting the CDC Zika virus epidemiological criteria (history of residence in or travel to a geographic region with active Zika transmission at the time of travel, or other epidemiological criteria for which Zika virus testing may be indicated). Positive results must be confirmed by following the latest CDC guidelines for the diagnosis of Zika virus infection. Results of this test are intended to be used in conjunction with clinical observations, patient history, epidemiological information, and other laboratory evidence to make patient management decisions. Zika IgM levels are variable over the course of the infection, and may be detectable near day 4 post onset of symptoms and persist up to approximately 12 weeks following initial infection. Negative results may be seen in specimens collected before day four post onset of symptoms or after the window of detectable IgM closes, and therefore do not preclude the possibility of Zika virus infection, past or present. This ADVIA Centaur Zika test is not indicated for testing blood or plasma donors.
Device Story
The ADVIA Centaur Zika test is an automated in vitro diagnostic assay for qualitative detection of Zika virus IgM antibodies in human serum and plasma. It utilizes an antibody capture immunoassay principle with chemiluminescence detection on the ADVIA Centaur XP and XPT systems. The device processes patient samples to identify IgM antibodies; results are used by clinicians alongside patient history and epidemiological data for presumptive diagnosis of Zika infection. The system provides automated analysis, reducing manual steps compared to traditional ELISA methods. It aids in patient management by identifying potential Zika infection, though positive results require confirmation per CDC guidelines. The device is intended for clinical laboratory use.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical performance evaluated via single-draw (n=49) and serial-draw (n=36 patients, 288 samples) studies comparing subject device to predicate. Overall positive percent agreement (PPA) was 93.31% (279/299). Specificity evaluated in various populations (n=2333), showing 99.06% negative percent agreement. FDA panel testing (n=36) showed 87.5% PPA and 100% NPA. No clinical data for blood donors.
Technological Characteristics
Qualitative antibody capture immunoassay using chemiluminescence detection. Reagents include NS1 antigen labeled with acridinium ester and streptavidin-coated paramagnetic microparticles with biotinylated anti-human IgM. Operates on ADVIA Centaur XP/XPT systems. Connectivity is integrated into the clinical laboratory system. Standards: CLSI EP05-A3 (precision), EP07-A3/EP37 (interference), EP09-A3 (matrix comparison), and ISO 14971 (risk management).
Indications for Use
Indicated for children, adolescents, and adults, including pregnant women, with clinical signs/symptoms of Zika virus infection or meeting CDC epidemiological criteria for testing. Not indicated for blood or plasma donors.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Zika virus serological reagents are in vitro diagnostic devices that consist of antigens or antibodies for the detection of Zika virus or Zika antibodies in human specimens from individuals who have signs and symptoms consistent with Zika virus infection and/or epidemiological risk factors. The detection aids in the diagnosis of current or recent Zika virus infection or serological status. Negative results obtained with this test do not preclude the possibility of Zika virus infection, past or present. Positive results should be interpreted with consideration of other clinical information and laboratory findings and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or other patient management decisions.
Special Controls
The special controls for this device are:
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) The labeling required under § 809.10(b) of this chapter must include:
(i) An intended use with a detailed description of what the device detects (Zika IgM antibodies, other Zika antibodies, or Zika antigens), the type of results provided to the user, the specimen type for which testing is indicated (
*e.g.,* serum, whole blood), the clinical indications appropriate for test use, and the specific population(s) for which the test is intended.(ii) Performance characteristics from analytical and clinical studies required under paragraphs (b)(2)(ii) and (iii) of this section.
(iii) A detailed explanation of the interpretation of results and criteria for validity of results (
*e.g.,* criteria that internal or external quality controls must meet in order for a test/test run to be valid, minimum signal strength that the sample has to yield to be interpretable as a valid result).(iv) Limiting statements indicating that:
(A) Results are not intended to be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment, or other patient management decisions. The test results should be interpreted in conjunction with clinical observations, patient history, epidemiological information, and other laboratory evidence.
(B) Device results are intended to be followed up according to the latest professional guidelines (
*e.g.,* recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) for the diagnosis of Zika virus infection.(C) Negative test results do not preclude the possibility of Zika virus infection, past or present.
(D) Specimens can result in false negative results on the device if collected outside of the appropriate response window for specific Zika virus antigens or antibodies, as determined by scientific evidence (
*e.g.,* for IgM <7 days post symptom onset (pso) or risk of exposure and if collected past 84 days pso).(v) Detailed instructions for use that minimize the risk of generating a false positive or false negative result (
*e.g.,* co-testing of other matrices).(2) Design verification and validation must include:
(i) A detailed device description, including all device parts (
*e.g.,* Zika antigen target, other flavivirus antigen target, capture antibodies), instrument requirements, ancillary reagents required but not provided, and the technological characteristics, including all pre-analytical methods for specimen processing.(ii) Detailed documentation and results from analytical performance studies including: characterization of the cut-off(s), analytical sensitivity to a standardized reference material that FDA has determined is appropriate (
*e.g.,* World Health Organization reference standard or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reference standard), class specificity for human antibodies (*e.g.,* IgM or IgG), analytical specificity (cross reactivity including cross reactivity to other flaviviruses), interference, carryover/cross contamination, specimen stability, hook effect (if applicable), matrix equivalency (if applicable), freeze-thaw studies (if applicable), and reproducibility.(iii) Detailed documentation and results from clinical studies, including the clinical study protocol (with a description of the testing algorithm and results interpretation table), detailed clinical study report, including line data of the clinical study results, and other appropriate statistical analysis. The samples used in the clinical study must be collected from subjects representative of the full spectrum of the intended use population (
*e.g.,* endemic and non-endemic regions if both are indicated).
{0}
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K191578
B Applicant
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc.
C Proprietary and Established Names
ADVIA Centaur Zika test, ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab (100 tests), ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM (50 tests), ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab Quality Control, ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM Quality Control
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| QFO | Class II | 21 CFR 866.3935 - Zika Virus Serological Reagents | MI - Microbiology |
| QCH | Class II | 21 CFR 866.3920 - Assayed quality control material for clinical microbiology assays | MI - Microbiology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
New 510(k) application for the ADVIA Centaur Zika Test.
B Measurand:
Human IgM antibodies to the Zika virus.
K191578 - Page 1 of 18
{1}
C Type of Test:
A dual-assay antibody capture immunoassay.
III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
B Indication(s) for Use:
The ADVIA Centaur Zika test is for in vitro diagnostic use in the qualitative detection of IgM antibodies to the Zika virus in human serum and plasma (potassium EDTA or lithium heparin) specimens using the ADVIA Centaur XP and ADVIA Centaur XPT systems.
The ADVIA Centaur Zika test is intended for the presumptive clinical laboratory diagnosis of Zika virus infection. The test is intended for use only in individuals (children, adolescents and adults, including pregnant women) with clinical signs and symptoms consistent with Zika virus infection, and/or meeting the CDC Zika virus epidemiological criteria (history of residence in or travel to a geographic region with active Zika transmission at the time of travel, or other epidemiological criteria for which Zika virus testing may be indicated). Positive results must be confirmed by following the latest CDC guidelines for the diagnosis of Zika virus infection.
Results of this test are intended to be used in conjunction with clinical observations, patient history, epidemiological information, and other laboratory evidence to make patient management decisions. Zika IgM levels are variable over the course of the infection, and may be detectable near day 4 post onset of symptoms and persist up to approximately 12 weeks following initial infection.
Negative results may be seen in specimens collected before day four post onset of symptoms or after the window of detectable IgM closes, and therefore do not preclude the possibility of Zika virus infection, past or present.
This ADVIA Centaur Zika test is not indicated for testing blood or plasma donors.
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
D Special Instrument Requirements:
ADVIA Centaur XP
ADVIA Centaur XPT
IV Device/System Characteristics:
K191578 - Page 2 of 18
{2}
K191578 - Page 3 of 18
# A Device Description:
The ADVIA Centaur Zika test is an automated in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative detection of IgM antibodies to the Zika virus. The test can be performed on either the ADVIA Centaur XP or the ADVIA Centaur XPT instrument systems. For both the ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab and ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assays, the system automatically performs the following actions:
1. Dispenses 15 µL of sample into a cuvette.
2. Dispenses 250 µL of Solid Phase, and incubates for 18.25 minutes at 37°C.
3. Separates, aspirates, and washes the cuvettes with ADVIA Centaur Wash 1.
4. Dispenses 50 µL each of Ancillary Well Reagent and Lite Reagent and incubates for 18 minutes at 37°C.
5. Separates, aspirates, and washes the cuvettes with ADVIA Centaur Wash 1.
6. Dispenses 300 µL of ADVIA Centaur Acid Reagent and 300 µL of ADVIA Centaur Base Reagent to initiate the chemiluminescent reaction.
7. Reports results according to the selected option, as described in the system operating instructions.
The systems consist of an instrument, computer, and preloaded software for running the tests and viewing the results. The instrument software manages the algorithm reflex testing, repeat testing, and results interpretation.
# B Principle of Operation:
The ADVIA Centaur Zika test detects IgM antibodies to the Zika virus by combining in a 2-assay algorithm the measurements of the ADVIA Centaur Ab assay and, as applicable, the ADVIA Centaur IgM assay. All patient samples are initially tested with the ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab assay. All ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab equivocal samples are then tested with the ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assay.
The ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab assay is an antibody capture immunoassay using a 2-pass format. In the first pass, coated microparticles (Solid Phase) are added to the cuvette, binding antibodies from the patient sample. The captured antibodies are washed and resuspended. In the second pass, the anti-Zika antibodies captured on the Solid Phase are detected by the addition of NS1 antigen labeled with acridinium ester (Lite Reagent) for chemiluminescent detection.
The ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assay is an IgM capture immunoassay using a 2-pass format. In the first pass the microparticles, coated with anti-human IgM monoclonal antibody (Solid Phase), are added to the cuvette, binding IgM from the patient sample. The captured IgM antibodies are washed and resuspended. In the second pass the anti-Zika IgM captured on the Solid Phase is detected by the addition of NS1 antigen labeled with acridinium ester (Lite Reagent) for chemiluminescent detection.
{3}
K191578 - Page 4 of 18
# Interpretation of results:

# C Instrument Description Information:
| Modes of Operation | Yes | No |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device? | ☑ | ☐ |
| Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission? | ☐ | ☑ |
| Software | | |
| FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types. | ☑ | ☐ |
1. **Instrument Name:**
ADVIA Centaur XP
ADVIA Centaur XPT
2. **Specimen Identification:**
Sample identification is either manually entered or barcode scanned into the system computer.
3. **Specimen Sampling and Handling:**
Managed by system software.
4. **Calibration:**
The instrument is calibrated with assay-specific calibrators provided in each assay kit. Calibration interval is 14 days or when reagent lot number is replaced, when system components are replaced, or when quality control results are repeatedly out of range.
{4}
K191578 - Page 5 of 18
5. Quality Control:
The assay manufacturer recommends use of ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab Quality Control with the ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab assay and ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM Quality Control with the ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assay. Quality control samples should be assayed at least once on each day that samples are analyzed to monitor system performance and chart trends.
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
ZIKV Detect 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
DEN180069
C Comparison with Predicate:
| Device & Predicate Device: | K191578 | DEN180069 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | ADVIA Centaur Zika Test | ZIKV Detect 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Analyte | Zika virus IgM antibodies | Same |
| Assay Results | Qualitative | Same |
| Methodology | Immunoassay using chemiluminescence detection | ELISA |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | The ADVIA Centaur Zika test is for in vitro diagnostic use in the qualitative detection of IgM antibodies to the Zika virus in human serum and plasma (potassium EDTA or lithium heparin) specimens using the ADVIA Centaur XP and ADVIA Centaur XPT systems. The ADVIA Centaur Zika test is intended for the presumptive clinical laboratory diagnosis of Zika virus infection. The test is intended for use only in individuals (children, adolescents and adults, including pregnant women) with clinical signs and symptoms consistent with Zika virus infection, and/or meeting the CDC Zika virus epidemiological criteria (history of residence in or travel to a geographic region with active Zika transmission at the time of travel, or other epidemiological criteria for which Zika virus testing may be indicated). Positive results must be confirmed by following the | The ZIKV Detect 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA is intended for the qualitative detection of Zika virus IgM antibodies in human sera for the presumptive clinical laboratory diagnosis of Zika virus infection. The assay is intended for use only in patients with clinical signs and symptoms consistent with Zika virus infection, and/or CDC Zika virus epidemiological criteria (e.g., history of residence in or travel to a geographic region with active Zika transmission at the time of travel, or other epidemiological criteria for which Zika virus testing may be indicated). Assay results are for the presumptive detection of IgM antibodies to Zika virus (ZIKV). Positive results must be confirmed by following the latest CDC guidelines for the diagnosis of Zika virus infection. Results of this test are intended to be used in conjunction with clinical observations, patient history, |
{5}
K191578 - Page 6 of 18
| | latest CDC guidelines for the diagnosis of Zika virus infection. Results of this test are intended to be used in conjunction with clinical observations, patient history, epidemiological information, and other laboratory evidence to make patient management decisions. Zika IgM levels are variable over the course of the infection, and may be detectable near day 4 post onset of symptoms and persist up to approximately 12 weeks following initial infection. Negative results may be seen in specimens collected before day 4 post onset of symptoms or after the window of detectable IgM closes, and therefore do not preclude the possibility of Zika virus infection, past or present. The ADVIA Centaur Zika test is not indicated for testing blood or plasma donors. | epidemiological information, and other laboratory evidence to make patient management decisions. Zika IgM levels are variable over the course of the infection, and may be detectable near day four post onset of symptoms and persist up to approximately 12 weeks following initial infection. Negative results may be seen in specimens collected before day four post onset of symptoms or after the window of detectable IgM closes, and therefore do not preclude the possibility of Zika virus infection, past or present. This assay is not indicated for testing blood or plasma donors. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Automation | Fully automated | Manual |
| Detection Label | Acridinum ester | Horseradish peroxidase |
| Specimen Type | Serum & Plasma (EDTA, LiHep) | Serum |
| Interpretation of Results | ADVIA Centaur ZikaAb < 0.80 Index: Negative for Antibodies to Zika Virus
ADVIA Centaur ZikaAb ≥ 0.80 Index: Reflex to ADVIA Centaur ZikaM:
ADVIA Centaur ZikaM Rep 1 < 1.00 Index: Negative for IgM Antibodies to Zika Virus
ADVIA Centaur ZikaM Rep 1 ≥ 1.00 Index: Repeat ADVIA Centaur ZikaM in duplicate
ADVIA Centaur ZikaM Rep 2&3 < 1.00 Index: Negative for IgM Antibodies to Zika Virus
ADVIA Centaur ZikaM Rep 2or3 ≥ 1.00 Index: Presumptive Zika Positive | Zika Ag OD450 ≥ Threshold Zika Ag OD450 AND Zika ISR value > 1.90: Presumptive Zika Positive
Initial: Zika Ag OD450 ≥ Threshold Zika Ag OD450 AND 1.50 ≤ Zika ISR ≤ 1.90: Retest in duplicate
Retest: Zika Ag OD450 ≥ Threshold Zika Ag OD450 AND Zika ISR value ≥ 1.70 Presumptive Zika Positive
Not Presumptive Zika Positive & CCA / NCA ratio ≥ 5.00: Presumptive Other Flavivirus Positive
Not Presumptive Zika Positive & CCA / NCA ratio < 5.00: Negative |
{6}
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
| Standard Title | Document Number | Publication Date | Recognition Number |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline – Third Edition | CLSI EP05-A3 | 2014 | 7-251 |
| Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry. 3rd Edition | CLSI EP07-3^{rd} Ed. | 2018 | 7-275 |
| Supplemental Tables For Interference Testing In Clinical Chemistry | CLSI EP37 | 2018 | 7-284 |
| Medical devices – Application of risk management to medical devices | ANSI/AAMI/ISO 14971:2007/(R)2010 | 2007/2010 | 5-40 |
| Special controls under 866.3935, Zika virus serological reagents | Code of Federal Regulation | 2019 | |
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
a. Precision (single site):
Within-laboratory precision was evaluated for the ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab and ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assays. The study was performed over twenty (20) days, with two (2) replicates taken in each of two (2) runs per day. Each completed run was evaluated with a single replicate from two separate aliquots of 2 levels of controls (Negative Control, Positive Control) and 2 of negative basepools spiked at various levels with a patient pool positive for Zika Virus IgM (Medical Decision Pools; MDPs). Dose values were calculated using a 2-point calibration curve stored from Day 0. The data were analyzed for the Repeatability %CV and Within-Lab %CV.
20-day Precision Results for ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab (Lot 1)
| Sample | Replicates | Mean | Repeatability | | Within-Run | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| Negative Control | 80 | 0.01 | 0.01 | --- | 0.02 | --- |
| Positive Control | 80 | 3.18 | 0.07 | 2.2 | 0.11 | 3.5 |
| MDP 1 | 80 | 0.58 | 0.02 | 4.2 | 0.03 | 5.3 |
| MDP 2 | 80 | 1.91 | 0.03 | 1.8 | 0.06 | 3.2 |
K191578 - Page 7 of 18
{7}
20-day Precision Results for ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab (Lot 2)
| Sample | Replicates | Mean | Repeatability | | Within-Run | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| Negative Control | 80 | 0.05 | 0.03 | --- | 0.04 | --- |
| Positive Control | 80 | 3.26 | 0.06 | 2.0 | 0.13 | 3.9 |
| MDP 1 | 80 | 0.63 | 0.03 | 4.0 | 0.03 | 5.0 |
| MDP 2 | 80 | 1.98 | 0.05 | 2.6 | 0.08 | 4.3 |
20-day Precision Results for ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM (Lot 1)
| Sample | Replicates | Mean | Repeatability | | Within-Lab | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| Negative Control | 80 | 0.05 | 0.06 | --- | 0.07 | --- |
| Positive Control | 80 | 3.15 | 0.04 | 1.3 | 0.09 | 2.8 |
| MDP 1 | 80 | 0.88 | 0.03 | 3.5 | 0.05 | 5.3 |
| MDP 2 | 80 | 2.12 | 0.05 | 2.2 | 0.07 | 3.1 |
20-day Precision Results for ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM (Lot 2)
| Sample | Replicates | Mean | Repeatability | | Within-Lab | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| Negative Control | 80 | 0.00 | 0.02 | --- | 0.02 | --- |
| Positive Control | 80 | 2.92 | 0.06 | 1.9 | 0.13 | 4.6 |
| MDP 1 | 80 | 0.82 | 0.04 | 4.4 | 0.06 | 7.9 |
| MDP 2 | 80 | 2.11 | 0.05 | 2.5 | 0.10 | 4.6 |
b. Reproducibility (multi-site):
Assay reproducibility was evaluated for the ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab and ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assays at three US sites. Five (5) panel membered pools spanning the non-reactive to reactive region of assay range were used for three (3) lots each of ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab and ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assays. Testing was performed at three sites, over five days, with two runs per day and three replicates per run (3 x 5 x 2 x 3 design).
Precision estimates were derived for repeatability, within-lab precision and reproducibility.
Reproducibility Results for ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab
| Sample | N | Mean | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Between-Site | | Reproducibility | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| ZikAR1 | 270 | 0.05 | 0.03 | --- | 0.02 | --- | 0.03 | --- | 0.00 | --- | 0.00 | --- | 0.05 | --- |
| ZikAR2 | 270 | 0.58 | 0.03 | 5.1 | 0.01 | 2.0 | 0.02 | 2.9 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.02 | 4.3 | 0.04 | 7.6 |
| ZikAR3 | 270 | 1.00 | 0.04 | 4.2 | 0.04 | 3.8 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.01 | 1.4 | 0.06 | 5.9 |
| ZikAR4 | 270 | 2.15 | 0.06 | 2.7 | 0.04 | 1.8 | 0.04 | 2.0 | 0.02 | 0.8 | 0.06 | 2.6 | 0.10 | 4.7 |
K191578 - Page 8 of 18
{8}
K191578 - Page 9 of 18
ZikAR5 270 3.08 0.08 2.7 0.09 2.8 0.06 1.9 0.04 1.3 0.08 2.6 0.16 5.2
Reproducibility Results for ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM
| Sample | N | Mean | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Between-Site | | Reproducibility | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| ZikMR1 | 270 | 0.09 | 0.07 | --- | 0.04 | --- | 0.02 | --- | 0.04 | --- | 0.04 | --- | 0.10 | --- |
| ZikMR2 | 270 | 0.67 | 0.05 | 7.3 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.01 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 6.9 | 0.07 | 10.1 |
| ZikMR3 | 270 | 1.08 | 0.04 | 3.8 | 0.02 | 1.9 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.05 | 4.4 | 0.07 | 6.1 |
| ZikMR4 | 270 | 2.40 | 0.05 | 2.2 | 0.04 | 1.5 | 0.03 | 1.3 | 0.04 | 1.8 | 0.09 | 3.9 | 0.13 | 5.2 |
| ZikMR5 | 270 | 3.53 | 0.08 | 2.3 | 0.02 | 0.7 | 0.06 | 1.6 | 0.06 | 1.8 | 0.14 | 4.0 | 0.19 | 5.3 |
2. Linearity:
Not applicable
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
a. Cross-Reactivity:
The performance of the ADVIA Centaur Zika test algorithm, incorporating the ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab and ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM, was evaluated in the presence of potentially cross-reacting substances. Potentially cross-reactive samples previously characterized as positive, per the supplier's Certificate of Analysis for various disease states were tested. Except for specimens with HCV, ANA, RF, HAMA, Malaria, and Yellow Fever Virus Post-Immunization, only specimens confirmed positive for IgM of the respective disease state were included in the analysis.
Summary ADVIA Centaur Zika Test Cross-Reactivity
| Disease State | Number of Samples Tested | ADVIA Centaur Zika Test Nonreactive Samples | ADVIA Centaur Zika Test Reactive Samples | Cross-Reactivity |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Anti-Adenovirus | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Anti-Borrelia sp. (Lyme) | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Anti-Chikungunya Virus | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Anti-CMV | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Anti-Dengue Virus | 41 | 39 | 2 | 4.88% |
| Anti-EBV | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Anti-HBV | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Anti-HCV | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Anti-HSV-1/2 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Anti-HSV-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Anti-HSV-2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Anti-Leptospira | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Malaria | 10 | 8 | 2 | 20.00% |
{9}
| ANA | 19 | 19 | 0 | 0.00% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Anti-Parvovirus B19 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Anti-Rubella Virus | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Anti-Toxoplasma gondii | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Syphilis | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Anti-VZV | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Anti-WNV | 23 | 23 | 0 | 0.00% |
| HAMA | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0.00% |
| RF | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Yellow Fever Immunization | 21 | 20 | 1 | 4.76% |
| Total | 341 | 336 | 5 | 1.47% |
## b. Endogenous Interference:
The performance of the ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab and ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assays were evaluated with specimens containing potentially interfering endogenous substance. Stock solutions of each interferent were prepared and spiked into three (3) different pools with varying Zika Virus IgM concentrations. A control sample was prepared for each interfering substance by spiking with the appropriate diluent at the same volume as the interfering substance. All samples were run in triplicate and doses were calculated using 2-point data reduction. The mean percent interference was calculated for mid-positive pool and high-positive pool samples across matrices.
The following substances were evaluated at the concentration listed:
Total Protein 12 g/dL
Hemoglobin 1000 mg/dL
Conjugated Bilirubin 40 mg/dL
Unconjugated Bilirubin 60 mg/dL
Biotin 3500 ng/mL
Cholesterol 500 mg/dL
Triglycerides 3000 mg/dL
None of the tested endogenous substances cause a change in clinical interpretation for ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab or ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM. All samples had interference of less than 15%, most were less than 10%. The percent interference averaged across matrices was less than 10% for all conditions.
## 4. Assay Reportable Range:
Not applicable
## 5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
### a. Traceability/Analytical Sensitivity:
The analytical sensitivity at the cut-off values for the ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab and ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assays was determined using WHO 1st International standard for anti-Asian lineage Zika virus antibody (human) (NIBSC 16/352). This preparation contains antibodies reactive to Dengue virus. The standard was used to prepare a dilution series which
K191578 - Page 10 of 18
{10}
was tested using linear regression. The concentration of the reference standard that corresponds to the cut-off value of 0.80 Index for ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab is 23.18 IU/mL. The concentration of the reference standard that corresponds to the cut-off value of 1.00 Index for ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM is 1000 IU/mL. Therefore, dilutions are not informative for the ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assay.
Results for WHO Dilutions (ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab)
| WHO Standard 16/352 Dilution | Expected WHO Concentration (IU/mL) | Observed ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab Index |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Neat | 1000 | 12.32 |
| 1:2 | 500 | 6.72 |
| 1:4 | 250 | 3.89 |
| 1:8 | 125 | 2.40 |
| 1:16 | 62.50 | 1.42 |
| 1:32 | 31.25 | 0.90 |
| 1:64 | 15.63 | 0.53 |
| 1:128 | 7.81 | 0.35 |
| Negative Basepool | 0.00 | 0.13 |
b. Stability:
Stability studies have been performed to support the following claims:
Sample Stability:
The study data supports specimen stability at the following storage temperatures and storage times:
- Stored capped and upright at 2–8°C for up to 5 days
- Stored separated samples at room temperature for up to 24 hours
- Stored on the instrument system for up to 8 hours
- Stored at ≤ -20°C for up to 150 days
- No more than 3 freeze-thaw cycles
Reagent kit, Calibrators & Controls Stability:
Stability Claims for ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab/IgM Reagents, Calibrators, Controls
| Stability Type | Claim |
| --- | --- |
| Zika Ab Reagent Shelf-Life Stability (2-8 °C) | 12 months |
| Zika IgM Reagent Shelf-Life Stability (2-8 °C) | 12 months |
| Zika Ab Calibrator Shelf-Life Stability (2-8 °C) | 12 months |
| Zika IgM Calibrator Shelf-Life Stability (2-8 °C) | 12 months |
| Zika Ab Control Shelf-Life Stability (2-8 °C) | 12 months |
| Zika IgM Control Shelf-Life Stability (2-8 °C) | 12 months |
| Zika Ab Reagent Onboard Stability (On System) | 28 days |
| Zika IgM Reagent Onboard Stability (On System) | 28 days |
| Zika Ab Reagent Onboard Stability (Calibration Interval) | 14 days |
K191578 - Page 11 of 18
{11}
| Zika IgM Reagent Onboard Stability (Calibration Interval) | 14 days |
| --- | --- |
| Zika Ab Calibrator Onboard Stability | 8 hours |
| Zika IgM Calibrator Onboard Stability | 8 hours |
| Zika Ab Control Onboard Stability | 8 hours |
| Zika IgM Control Onboard Stability | 8 hours |
| Zika Ab Calibrator Open Vial Stability | 60 days |
| Zika IgM Calibrator Open Vial Stability | 60 days |
| Zika Ab Control Open Vial Stability | 60 days |
| Zika IgM Control Open Vial Stability | 60 days |
# 6. Detection Limit:
Not applicable.
# 7. Assay Cut-Off:
The assay standardization for the ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab and ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assays is based on agreement with known Zika positive samples. Assigned values of calibrators and controls are traceable to this standardization. The ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab assay has been standardized such that the clinical cutoff is set at 0.80 Index. The ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assay has been standardized such that the clinical cutoff is set at 1.00 Index.
# 8. Class Specificity:
An IgM blocking study was used to evaluate the potential of cross-reactivity to Zika IgG by the ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab and ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assays. A Zika IgG serial dilution study using a monoclonal antibody IgG specific to Zika NS1 was undertaken to determine the cross-reactivity of ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab and ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM to Zika-specific IgG.
The results from the IgM blocking study indicate that while Zika IgG cross-reacts with ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab, ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM does not appear to bind human Zika IgG. The IgG serial dilution study showed that while some Zika IgG cross-reactivity is seen with ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab, the ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assay does not cross-react with Zika specific IgG up to a concentration of $1\mu \mathrm{g / mL}$ .
# 9. Performance with FDA Zika Panel
Performance of the ADVIA Centaur Zika test was evaluated by testing a panel of samples provided by the FDA. The FDA's panel consists of plasma samples from individuals infected with Zika, West Nile, or Dengue viruses at various stages of infection. Sample demographics and results were randomized and blinded to diagnostic developers to assess the proficiency of their tests. Performance was assessed from the subset of panel members for which a consensus of serostatus was established:
K191578 - Page 12 of 18
{12}
| | ADVIA Centaur Zika test | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Presumptive Zika Positive | Negative for Antibodies to Zika Virus* | Negative for IgM Antibodies to Zika Virus |
| Zika IgM Consensus | Positive (n=24) | 21 | 1 | 3 |
| | Negative (n=12) | 0 | 10 | 2 |
*Total anti-Zika antibodies
PPA= 21/24, 87.5%
NPA= 12/12, 100%
| | ADVIA Centaur Zika test | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Presumptive Zika Positive (False Positives) | Negative for Antibodies to Zika Virus* | Negative for IgM Antibodies to Zika Virus |
| Cross-reactivity Evaluation | West Nile** (n=11) | 0 | 11 | 0 |
| | Dengue** (n=10) | 0 | 6 | 4 |
*Total anti-Zika antibodies
**Note these were single bleeds that were positive for West Nile Virus or Dengue and negative for Zika.
This evaluation was performed using samples provided by Blood Systems Research Institute (BSRI, now Vitalant Research Institute) from a study supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health. The panel composition and consensus results are the responsibility of the FDA and do not necessarily represent the official views of BSRI, the NHLBI, or the National Institutes of Health.
## B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
See section "C" below.
2. Matrix Comparison:
The performance of the ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab and ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assays was evaluated using different matrices and sample collection tube types. Matched sample sets spanning the assay range for serum, EDTA plasma, and lithium heparin plasma used for the matrix comparison studies. For each matrix, twenty samples were prepared. Five (5) patient samples were spiked to make four (4) samples per patient (unspiked negative, high negative/borderline, low positive, mid positive). All the samples were run in singlicate. The
K191578 - Page 13 of 18
{13}
doses were calculated using a 2-point data calibration. Data were analyzed by Deming regression and results from plasma samples were compared to results of serum samples.
Results with ADVIA Centaur Zika AB assay:
| Specimen (y) | Reference Specimen (x) | Regression Equation | Sample Interval | Na | rb |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lithium heparin (plasma) | Serum | y = 1.02x - 0.04 | 0.00–3.86 | 20 | 1.00 |
| Potassium EDTA (plasma) | Serum | y = 0.98x - 0.01 | 0.00–3.67 | 20 | 1.00 |
a Number of samples tested.
b Correlation coefficient.
Results with ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assay:
| Specimen (y) | Reference Specimen (x) | Regression Equation | Sample Interval | Na | rb |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lithium heparin (plasma) | Serum | y = 1.06x + 0.00 | 0.00–5.44 | 20 | 1.00 |
| Potassium EDTA (plasma) | Serum | y = 1.06x - 0.00 | 0.00–5.78 | 20 | 1.00 |
a Number of samples tested.
b Correlation coefficient.
# C Clinical Studies:
# 1. Assay Performance with Zika-Positive Populations:
# a. Single-Draw Specimens:
The performance of the ADVIA Centaur Zika test was evaluated using single-draw specimens from individuals who tested positive by PCR. A single blood draw was obtained from 49 individuals who tested positive for Zika virus by PCR. Samples were tested at three sites in accordance with the algorithm of the ADVIA Centaur Zika test. Results from the ADVIA Centaur Zika test were compared to the predicate device.
Discordant results between ADVIA Centaur Zika test and the predicate device were further evaluated using Plaque Reduction Neutralization Tests (PRNT) for Zika virus and Dengue virus and the current CDC algorithm for the interpretation of Zika virus antibody test results.
ADVIA Centaur Zika test was Reactive for 47 of the 49 confirmed-positive samples. ZIKV Detect 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA was Presumptive Zika Positive in all 49 samples.
K191578 - Page 14 of 18
{14}
Positive Percent Agreement with Predicate Device
| Days After Symptom Onset | Predicate Device Negative | | | Predicate Device Positive | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | ADVIA Centaur Zika Test Reactive | ADVIA Centaur Zika Test Nonreactive | Negative % Agreement | ADVIA Centaur Zika Test Reactive | ADVIA Centaur Zika Test Nonreactive | Positive % Agreement |
| 0-7 | 0 | 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | --- |
| 8-14 | 0 | 0 | --- | 19 | 2 | 90.48% |
| 15-28 | 0 | 0 | --- | 15 | 0 | 100.00% |
| 29-42 | 0 | 0 | --- | 3 | 0 | 100.00% |
| 43-56 | 0 | 0 | --- | 1 | 0 | 100.00% |
| 57-70 | 0 | 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | --- |
| ≥71 | 0 | 0 | --- | 0 | 0 | --- |
| Variable* | 0 | 0 | --- | 9 | 0 | 100.00% |
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | --- | 47 | 2 | 95.92% |
| TOTAL (≥ Day 8) | 0 | 0 | --- | 47 | 2 | 95.92% |
* Specimens were collected between 4 to 8 weeks after symptom onset. However, the symptom onset is unknown.
b. Serial-Draw Specimens:
The performance of the ADVIA Centaur Zika test was evaluated using serial-draw specimens from individuals who tested positive by PCR. Eight serial blood draws (timing of draws unique to each patient) were obtained from 36 individuals who tested positive for Zika Virus by PCR methods. Samples were tested in singlicate by ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab and ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM. Performance of the ADVIA Centaur Zika test was compared against results obtained from testing with the predicate device.
Summary of ADVIA Centaur Zika Test Seroconversion Sensitivity
| ADVIA Centaur Zika test Reactive at Same Bleed as predicate | 27 |
| --- | --- |
| ADVIA Centaur Zika test Reactive Later than predicate | 4 |
| ADVIA Centaur Zika test Reactive Earlier than predicate | 5 |
| NET (Earlier – Later Reactivity) | 1 |
| Total Reactive Samples (Out of 288 Total Samples) | 249 |
The percent agreement of ADVIA Centaur Zika test to the predicate device was determined by stratifying the serial bleed samples into groups based on days after symptom onset.
K191578 - Page 15 of 18
{15}
Positive Percent Agreement with Predicate Device
| Days After Symptom Onset | Predicate Negative | | | Predicate Positive | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | ADVIA Centaur Zika Test Reactive | ADVIA Centaur Zika Test Nonreactive | Negative % Agreement | ADVIA Centaur Zika Test Reactive | ADVIA Centaur Zika Test Nonreactive | Positive % Agreement |
| 0-7 | 5 | 21 | 80.77% | 7 | 4 | 63.64% |
| 8-14 | 0 | 0 | --- | 26 | 0 | 100.00% |
| 15-28 | 1 | 0 | 0.00% | 56 | 1 | 98.25% |
| 29-42 | 3 | 0 | 0.00% | 61 | 2 | 96.83% |
| 43-56 | 3 | 0 | 0.00% | 59 | 4 | 93.65% |
| 57-70 | 5 | 0 | 0.00% | 18 | 4 | 81.82% |
| ≥71 | 0 | 0 | --- | 5 | 3 | 62.50% |
| TOTAL | 17 | 21 | 55.26% | 232 | 18 | 92.80% |
| TOTAL (≥ Day 8) | 12 | 0 | 0.00% | 225 | 14 | 94.14% |
The overall positive percent agreement was calculated by combining the results from the Single Bleed and Serial Draw studies.
Positive Percent Agreement with Predicate
| Days After Symptom Onset | Predicate Negative | | | Predicate Positive | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | ADVIA Centaur Zika Test Reactive | ADVIA Centaur Zika Test Nonreactive | Negative % Agreement | ADVIA Centaur Zika Test Reactive | ADVIA Centaur Zika Test Nonreactive | Positive % Agreement |
| 0-7 | 5 | 21 | 80.77% | 7 | 4 | 63.64% |
| 8-14 | 0 | 0 | --- | 45 | 2 | 95.74% |
| 15-28 | 1 | 0 | 0.00% | 71 | 1 | 98.61% |
| 29-42 | 3 | 0 | 0.00% | 64 | 2 | 96.97% |
| 43-56 | 3 | 0 | 0.00% | 60 | 4 | 93.75% |
| 57-70 | 5 | 0 | 0.00% | 18 | 4 | 81.82% |
| ≥71 | 0 | 0 | --- | 5 | 3 | 62.50% |
| Variable | 0 | 0 | --- | 9 | 0 | 100.00% |
| TOTAL | 17 | 21 | 55.26% | 279 | 20 | 93.31% |
| TOTAL (≥ Day 8) | 12 | 0 | 0.00% | 272 | 16 | 94.44% |
K191578 - Page 16 of 18
{16}
K191578 - Page 17 of 18
# 2. Assay Performance with Zika-Negative Populations:
The clinical specificity of the ADVIA Centaur Zika test was evaluated using specimens from individuals categorized as follows:
- Individuals from areas of low Zika virus prevalence (non-endemic areas)
- Healthy blood donors
- Pregnant women
- Pediatrics
- Individuals from areas of high Zika virus prevalence (endemic areas)
- Residents of endemic areas who are symptomatic
- Residents of endemic areas who are asymptomatic
- Travelers to endemic areas
Samples were tested at three sites in accordance with the ADVIA Centaur Zika test algorithm. The negative percent agreement of the ADVIA Centaur Zika test in the various specificity populations is presented in the following table.
## Negative Percent Agreement with Predicate
| Category | Samples Negative by Predicate | ADVIA Centaur Zika Test | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Number Reactive | Number Nonreactive | Negative Percent Agreement |
| Traveler to Zika-Endemic Area | 47 | 0 | 47 | 100.00% |
| Symptomatic Resident of Zika-Endemic Area | 46 | 1 | 45 | 97.83% |
| Asymptomatic Resident of Zika-Endemic Area | 262 | 19 | 243 | 92.75% |
| Healthy Donor from Non-Endemic Area | 1365 | 0 | 1365 | 100.00% |
| Pregnant Donor from Non-Endemic Area | 485 | 2 | 483 | 99.59% |
| Pediatric Donor from Non-Endemic Area | 128 | 0 | 128 | 100.00% |
| All Endemic Area Specimens | 355 | 20 | 335 | 94.37% |
| All Non-Endemic Area Specimens | 1978 | 2 | 1976 | 99.90% |
| Total | 2333 | 22 | 2311 | 99.06% |
# 3. Pediatric Sample Spiking Study
Pediatric samples (ages ranged between 4 and 17) were spiked with samples from adults with known Zika IgM concentrations to demonstrate that the ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab and ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assays yield similar results with spiked pediatric samples compared to spiked adult samples.
Seven Zika IgM samples were used to spike pediatric and adult specimens. Each of the Zika IgM positive samples was used to spike up to three pediatric and adult specimens. Spiking was targeted between 1.00 and 1.50 Index as measured using the ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab and ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM assays. Observed doses in both the spiked pediatric and adult samples were compared to the expected target doses for each sample.
{17}
The recovery patterns for spiked pediatric samples were similar, and statistically equivalent, to those observed for spiked adult samples. The study demonstrates that the pediatric sample matrix is unlikely to interfere with Zika IgM measurements by ADVIA Centaur Zika Ab and ADVIA Centaur Zika IgM.
An additional study evaluated five native pediatric samples from patients identified as having Zika virus infection. The samples, obtained from donors who ranged in age from 11 to 17, were tested with the ADVIA Centaur Zika Test and the predicate device. Four of the samples tested Presumptive Zika Positive by both assays and one sample tested Negative for Zika Antibodies and Presumptive Zika Positive by the predicate device.
## D Expected Values/Reference Range:
The prevalence of Zika virus infection varies by geographic location.
In a population of 2018 volunteer blood donors, pregnant females and pediatric subjects from an area of low prevalence of Zika virus infection (mainland U.S.), 2016 (99.90%) samples were found to be nonreactive and 2 of these samples were Presumptive Zika Positive using the ADVIA Centaur Zika test.
In a population of 85 patients reactive for Zika IgM, 83 (97.65%) were found to be Presumptive Zika Positive using the ADVIA Centaur Zika test. Four of the five samples tested Presumptive Zika Positive while the fifth sample tested Negative for Zika antibodies by the ADVIA Centaur Zika test and Presumptive Zika Positive by the predicate device.
## E Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data:
Not applicable.
## VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
## IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K191578 - Page 18 of 18
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.