K191545 · Exogenesis Corporation · FTL · Sep 26, 2019 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K191545
Device Name
Exogenesis Hernia Mesh
Applicant
Exogenesis Corporation
Product Code
FTL · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Sep 26, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.3300
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is indicated for the repar of abdominal wall hernias and abdominal wall deficiencies that require the addition of reinforcing material to obtain the desired surgical result. The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is indicated for the repair of abdominal wall hernia defects, including inguinal (direct & indirect). The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is not indicated for transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair. The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is intended for single patient one-time use only.
Device Story
Sterile, non-resorbable surgical mesh; composed of knitted polypropylene filaments; provides mechanical support for soft tissue reconstruction; used for abdominal wall hernia repair. Device undergoes proprietary Accelerated Neutral Atom Beam (ANAB) surface treatment to increase microscopic filament surface area. Implanted by surgeons in clinical settings to reinforce tissue defects; promotes tissue ingrowth while minimizing inflammatory response. Output is physical reinforcement of fascial deficiencies; provides long-term tissue support. Benefits include reduced implant mass and effective hernia repair.
Clinical Evidence
Bench and animal testing only. Bench testing compared physical/mechanical properties (thickness, pore size, tear resistance, tensile strength, suture pull-out, burst strength) of processed vs. untreated mesh and against predicate. Animal study (90 and 180 days) assessed localized tissue interaction and burst strength; results showed processed and untreated meshes were comparable and exceeded native abdominal wall burst strength.
Indicated for patients requiring repair of abdominal wall hernias and deficiencies, including direct and indirect inguinal hernias. Not indicated for transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Surgical mesh is a metallic or polymeric screen intended to be implanted to reinforce soft tissue or bone where weakness exists. Examples of surgical mesh are metallic and polymeric mesh for hernia repair, and acetabular and cement restrictor mesh used during orthopedic surgery.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left, there is a seal for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. To the right of the seal, there is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square, the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" are written in blue.
September 26, 2019
Exogenesis Corporation % Maureen O'Connell President O'Connell Regulatory Consultants, Inc. 44 Oak Street Stoneham, Massachusetts 02180
Re: K191545
Trade/Device Name: Exogenesis Hernia Mesh Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.3300 Regulation Name: Surgical Mesh Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: FTL Dated: June 10, 2019 Received: June 11, 2019
Dear Ms. O'Connell:
We have reviewed vour Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Cindy Chowdhury, Ph.D., M.B.A. Acting Assistant Director DHT4B: Division of Infection Control and Plastic Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K191545
Device Name Exogenesis Hernia Mesh
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is indicated for the repar of abdominal wall hernias and abdominal wall deficiencies that require the addition of reinforcing material to obtain the desired surgical result. The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is indicated for the repair of abdominal wall hernia defects, including inguinal (direct & indirect). The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is not indicated for transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair.
The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is intended for single patient one-time use only.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-size:10pt"><svg height="15" width="15"><rect fill="none" height="15" stroke="black" width="15"></rect></svg> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)</span> | <span style="font-size:10pt"><svg height="15" width="15"><rect fill="none" height="15" stroke="black" width="15"></rect></svg> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)</span> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
a
Exogenesis Hernia Mesh Premarket Notification: Traditional 510(k)
## 510(k) Summary
### Exogenesis Hernia Mesh
| Submitter: | Exogenesis Corporation<br>20 Fortune Drive<br>Billerica, MA 01821<br>978-439-0120 |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Maureen O'Connell<br>O'Connell Regulatory Consultants, Inc.<br>44 Oak Street<br>Stoneham, MA 02180<br>Phone: 978-207-1245 |
| Date Prepared: | September 18, 2019 |
| Trade Name: | Exogenesis Hernia Mesh |
| Classification Name: | Surgical Mesh |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 878.3300 |
| Product Code: | FTL |
| Predicate Device: | Ethicon, Inc. Prolene Polypropylene Mesh Non-Absorbable<br>Synthetic Surgical Mesh – K180829 |
| Device Description: | The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is a sterile prosthesis designed to<br>provide mechanical support for reconstruction of soft tissue<br>deficiencies. The device is intended for the repair of hernias and<br>other fascial deficiencies requiring the addition of reinforcing or<br>bridging material to obtain the desired surgical result. The<br>Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is composed of knitted filaments of<br>extruded polypropylene, and knitted to provide elasticity in both<br>directions. This construction permits the mesh to be cut into any<br>desired shape or size without unraveling. The Exogenesis Hernia<br>Mesh is treated with a proprietary technology to modify the surface<br>of the mesh to increase surface area of the filaments on a<br>microscopic level. |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use: The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is indicated for the repair of abdominal wall hernias and abdominal wall deficiencies that require the addition of reinforcing material to obtain the desired surgical result. The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is indicated for the repair of abdominal wall hernia defects, including inguinal (direct & indirect). The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is not indicated for transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair.
> The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is intended for single patient one-time use only.
### Summary of Technological
Characteristics: The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is constructed of polypropylene fibers warp knitted together to form the mesh. The knitting process creates a device with large pores and minimum density and thickness similar to the light weight meshes currently on the market. The result is an implant which allows tissue ingrowth that reinforces the tissue defect, while minimizing the inflammatory response and fibrous encapsulation related to implant mass. The mesh possesses the mechanical and physical properties necessary for long term tissue support. The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is surface treated using a proprietary process to increase surface area of the filaments on a microscopic level.
# Substantial Equivalence
Discussion:
Exogenesis Corporation believes that the Exogenesis Hernia Mesh described in this notification and for use under the conditions of the proposed labeling is substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate device that is a Class II medical device. The following table presents the Exogenesis Hernia Mesh compared with the predicate device which is the Ethicon, Inc. Prolene Polypropylene Mesh Non-Absorbable Synthetic Surgical Mesh cleared in K180829.
{5}------------------------------------------------
#
| Characteristic | Exogenesis Hernia Mesh | Prolene Polypropylene Mesh Non-<br>Absorbable Synthetic Surgical Mesh |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Manufacturer | Exogenesis Corporation | Ethicon Inc. |
| 510(k) Number | TBD | K180829 |
| Class | II | II |
| Device Classification<br>Name | Mesh, Surgical, Polymeric | Mesh, Surgical, Polymeric |
| Regulation Number | 878.3300 | 878.3300 |
| Product Code | FTL | FTL |
| Use | Prescription | Prescription |
| Indications for Use | ... is indicated for the repair of abdominal wall<br>hernias and abdominal wall deficiencies that<br>require the addition of reinforcing material to<br>obtain the desired surgical result. The<br>Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is indicated for the<br>repair of abdominal wall hernia defects,<br>including inguinal (direct & indirect). The<br>Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is not indicated for<br>transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair.<br><br>...is intended for single patient one-time use<br>only. | ...is indicated for the repair of abdominal<br>wall hernias and abdominal wall<br>deficiencies that require the addition of a<br>reinforcing material to obtain the desired<br>surgical result. The PROLENE™ Hernia<br>System is indicated for the repair of<br>abdominal wall hernia defects, including<br>inguinal (direct & indirect). |
| Device Composition | Polypropylene (non-resorbable) | Polypropylene (non-resorbable) |
| Construction | Knitted filaments of extruded polypropylene | Knitted filaments of extruded<br>polypropylene |
| Bench Testing for<br>Hernia Mesh | Pass | Pass |
| Animal Data | Yes | No |
| Biocompatibility | Biocompatible | Biocompatible |
| Sterile | Yes | Yes |
| Characteristic | Exogenesis Hernia Mesh | Prolene Polypropylene Mesh Non-Absorbable Synthetic Surgical Mesh |
| Single Use | Yes | Yes |
## Substantial Equivalence Comparison
{6}------------------------------------------------
The intended use of both the Exogenesis Hernia Mesh and the Prolene predicate device is as a soft tissue patch to reinforce soft tissue where weakness exists and for the surgical repair of damaged or ruptured soft tissue. The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh and the Prolene predicate device are both mesh devices composed of polypropylene which is non-resorbable. Both devices are made from knitted filaments of extruded polypropylene. Both devices are provided sterile and are for single use only. The Exogenesis Hernia Mesh has an additional processing step compared to the Prolene, which is Accelerated Neutral Atom Beam (ANAB) processing. This step does not add any new materials of construction and does not change the chemical composition of the product
### Performance Testing
Biocompatibility testing has been performed on the final version of the Exogenesis Hernia Mesh which supports the substantial equivalence of the material including the processing. Performance testing is provided which compares the physical characteristics of the Exogenesis Hernia Mesh in both its untreated state and with processing as well as compared to the predicate device. There were no significant differences between the Exogenesis untreated Hernia Mesh and the Exogenesis processed Hernia Mesh in physical or mechanical parameters. These results confirm that the processing has no measurable impact on the structure and function of the polypropylene mesh and supports substantial equivalence.
In addition, there were no significant differences between the Exogenesis Hernia Mesh and the Prolene predicate device with respect to mesh thickness and single-fiber thickness. However, the pore size for the Exogenesis Hernia Mesh was greater than that of the predicate device. In performance testing, there were no differences between the Exogenesis Hernia Mesh and the Prolene predicate device in tear resistance. Given that Prolene is a stiffer mesh, it demonstrated higher tensile, suture pull-out and burst strength than the Exogenesis Hernia Mesh. However, published results for the Prolite Ultra showed that the Exogenesis mesh was higher than the ProLite Ultra. In addition, all meshes reported higher burst strength than that of abdominal muscle. The results of this testing confirm that the Exogenesis Hernia Mesh is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Additionally, animal testing was performed which assessed the localized tissue interaction and the mechanical properties of the untreated Exogenesis Hernia Mesh compared to the processed Exogenesis Hernia Mesh. Results at Day 90 and Day 180 showed that both versions of the Exogenesis Hernia Mesh were comparable in burst strength, and both were much greater in burst strength as compared to the native abdominal wall.
Therefore, biocompatibility testing and bench and animal testing support substantial equivalence.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Therefore, in summary, the new device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics to the predicate device and is therefore, substantially equivalent. Performance data support substantial equivalence of the different technological characteristics.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.