K191502 · Heraeus Medical Components, LLC · DQX · Nov 26, 2019 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K191502
Device Name
Heraeus Peripheral Guidewire
Applicant
Heraeus Medical Components, LLC
Product Code
DQX · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Nov 26, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1330
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Intended to facilitate the placement of balloon dilation catheters during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in peripheral arteries including but not limited to femoral, popliteal arteries. This guide wire may also be used with compatible interventional devices during therapeutic procedures. The guide wire may also be used to reach and cross a target lesion, provide a pathway within the vessel structure, facilitate the substitution of one diagnostic or interventional device for another, and to distinguish the vasculature.
Device Story
Heraeus Peripheral Guidewire is a manually operated device used to facilitate placement of balloon dilation catheters and other interventional devices in peripheral arteries. It consists of a steel core with an optional nitinol alloy tip, encapsulated by polymer and a lubricious outer layer. The distal section features radiopaque loading and a hydrophilic coating. Operated by physicians in clinical settings, the guidewire is inserted into the vasculature through a guiding catheter and advanced to a target lesion. It provides a pathway for device exchange and helps distinguish vasculature. By enabling navigation to and crossing of target lesions, the device assists in therapeutic procedures, potentially improving patient outcomes in peripheral vascular interventions.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance testing included biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1:2018), corrosion resistance, dimensional inspection, sterile package integrity, tensile strength, tip flexibility, torque strength, torqueability, kink/fracture resistance, radiopacity, coating integrity/lubricity, track/simulated use, and particulate evaluation. All predetermined acceptance criteria were met.
Technological Characteristics
Steel core with optional nitinol alloy tip; encapsulated by polymer with lubricious outer layer. Distal section includes radiopaque loading and hydrophilic coating. Manual operation. Sterilization method equivalent to predicate.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in peripheral arteries, including femoral, popliteal, and infra-popliteal arteries. Contraindicated for use in coronary or cerebral vasculature.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A catheter guide wire is a coiled wire that is designed to fit inside a percutaneous catheter for the purpose of directing the catheter through a blood vessel.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is a torque device that is manually operated, non-patient contacting, and intended to manipulate non-cerebral vascular guide wires, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 870.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
November 26, 2019
Heraeus Medical Components, LLC Chelsea Pioske Regulatory Affairs Manager 2605 Fernbrook Lane North, Suite J Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Re: K191502
Trade/Device Name: Heraeus Peripheral Guidewire Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1330 Regulation Name: Catheter Guide Wire Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DQX Dated: October 25, 2019 Received: October 28, 2019
Dear Chelsea Pioske:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for Lydia Glaw Assistant Director DHT2C: Division of Coronary and Peripheral Intervention Devices OHT2: Office of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K191502
Device Name Heraeus Peripheral Guidewire
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
Intended to facilitate the placement of balloon dilation catheters during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in peripheral arteries including but not limited to femoral, popliteal arteries. This guide wire may also be used with compatible interventional devices during therapeutic procedures. The guide wire may also be used to reach and cross a target lesion, provide a pathway within the vessel structure, facilitate the substitution of one diagnostic or interventional device for another, and to distinguish the vasculature.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span> <span style="font-size:16px"> <b> </b> </span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> </div> | <div> <span> <span style="font-size:16px"> <b> </b> </span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> </div> |
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
| Submitter: | Heraeus Medical Components, LLC<br>1805 Fernbrook Lane North, Suite J<br>Plymouth, MN 55447 USA |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Chelsea Becker, Regulatory Manager<br>1805 Fernbrook Lane North, Suite J<br>Plymouth, MN 55447 USA<br>763-225-6500 (voice)<br>763-559-7676 (fax) |
| Date Prepared: | November 25th, 2019 |
| Trade Name: | Heraeus Peripheral Guidewire |
| Common Name: | Guidewire |
| Classification: | Class II<br>Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1330<br>Catheter guide wire |
| Product Code: | DQX |
| Predicate Device: | The subject device is substantially equivalent to K122573;<br>Abbott Hi-Torque Command guidewire. |
| Device Description: | The Heraeus Peripheral Guidewire is a guidewire constructed<br>using a steel core with an optional nitinol alloy tip<br>encapsulated by polymer and lubricious outer layer. The<br>distal polymer includes a radiopaque loading, and the distal<br>polymer section has a hydrophilic coating. |
| Indication for Use: | The peripheral guidewire is intended to facilitate the<br>placement of balloon dilatation catheters during percutaneous<br>transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in peripheral arteries<br>including but not limited to femoral, popliteal and infra-<br>popliteal arteries. This guide wire may also be used with<br>compatible interventional devices during therapeutic<br>procedures. The guide wire may also be used to reach and<br>cross a target lesion, provide a pathway within the vessel<br>structure, facilitate the substitution of one diagnostic or<br>interventional device for another, and to distinguish the<br>vasculature. |
| Contraindications: | Not intended for use in the coronary or cerebral vasculature. |
| Principle of<br>Operation: | The Heraeus Peripheral Guidewire is manually inserted into<br>vasculature through a compatible guiding catheter and<br>advanced to the target region. |
| Substantial<br>Equivalence<br>Comparison: | The Heraeus Peripheral Guidewire is substantially equivalent<br>to the Abbott Hi-Torque Command guidewire (K122573).<br>Substantial equivalence is based on indications for use,<br>physical and technological characteristics, and comparative<br>device testing. |
| | Indications for use:<br>• The indications for use for the Heraeus Peripheral<br>Guidewire are equivalent to the predicate. |
| | Fundamental scientific technology<br>• Dimensional characteristics – the length and diameter of the device are similar to the dimensions of the predicate devices<br>• Materials – the device is constructed of equivalent materials to provide equivalent performance characteristics and coating properties<br>• Operating principle - equivalent to the predicate device<br>• Packaging materials - equivalent to the predicate device<br>• Sterility assurance level and method of sterilization - equivalent to the predicate devices |
| Performance<br>Testing: | In vitro bench tests were utilized to demonstrate equivalence<br>with reference to FDA Guidance - Coronary and<br>Cerebrovascular Guidewire Guidance - January 1995.<br>The performance testing assessment supports that the<br>biocompatibility, shelf life, and functional specifications of<br>the proposed guidewire device were met. |
| | The Heraeus Peripheral Guidewire device test data supports<br>the claims of substantial equivalence to the predicate devices.<br>Biological Safety of the predicate device has been established<br>through biocompatibility testing carried out in compliance<br>with ISO 10993-1:2018 and the 2016 FDA guidance, "Use of<br>International Standard ISO 10993-1, “Biological evaluation of<br>medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk<br>management process." |
| | The following bench tests were conducted or evaluated to<br>support the proposed device:<br>• Biocompatibility testing:<br> |
{4}------------------------------------------------
{5}------------------------------------------------
- Cytotoxicity o
- Sensitization o
- Intracutaneous Reactivity O
- Acute Systemic Toxicity O
- Pyrogenicity Testing O
- Hemolysis O
- In-Vivo Thrombogenicity O
- Coagulation O
- 0 Platelet Activation
- o Haematology
- o Complement Activation
- Corrosion resistance ●
- Dimensional inspection
- Sterile package integrity testing ●
- Tensile strength
- Tip flexibility ●
- Torque strength
- Torqueability
- Kink/Fracture Resistance
- Kink resistance
- Radiopacity ●
- Coating Integrity, Lubricity ●
- Track/Simulated Use ●
- Particulate Evaluation ●
## Conclusion:
The Heraeus Peripheral Guidewire met all predetermined acceptance criteria and compared favorably with the predicate
Heraeus considers the Heraeus Peripheral Guidewire to be equivalent to the predicate device. This conclusion is based upon the fact that the device has an equivalent intended use, and there are no differences that raise new types of questions of safety and effectiveness.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.