OptiFix AT Absorbable Fixation System with Articulating Technology – 30 Fasteners, OptiFix AT Absorbable Fixation System with Articulating Technology – 15 Fasteners
K191287 · Davol Inc., Subsidiary of C.R. Bard · GDW · Jul 16, 2019 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K191287
Device Name
OptiFix AT Absorbable Fixation System with Articulating Technology – 30 Fasteners, OptiFix AT Absorbable Fixation System with Articulating Technology – 15 Fasteners
Applicant
Davol Inc., Subsidiary of C.R. Bard
Product Code
GDW · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Jul 16, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4750
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The OptiFix™ AT Absorbable Fixation System with Articulating Technology is indicated for the approximation of soft tissue and fixation of surgical mesh to tissues during open or laparoscopic surgical procedures, such as hernia repair.
Device Story
OptiFix AT is a sterile, single-use, absorbable fixation system for soft tissue and surgical mesh. Device consists of a deployment handle and preloaded absorbable fasteners (15 or 30 count). Handle features 360-degree rotation; shaft tip is articulable to facilitate surgical access. Used in open or laparoscopic procedures by surgeons. Fasteners are made of Poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) and dyed with D&C Violet No. 2; they provide long-term fixation (>30 days) and absorb over 360 days. Device is manually operated; no electronic or software components. Benefits include secure mesh fixation and improved access via articulating shaft.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical studies were performed for this submission or the predicate device. Evidence is based on non-clinical design verification and validation testing, biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993, and package integrity testing per ISO 11607.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) fasteners, D&C Violet No. 2 dye. Design: Pistol-grip handle with 360-degree rotation, 37 cm shaft with 6 cm articulation. Sterilization: Gamma irradiation. Biocompatibility: ISO 10993 compliant. Packaging: PETG tray in foil pouch.
Indications for Use
Indicated for soft tissue approximation and surgical mesh fixation during open or laparoscopic procedures (e.g., hernia repair).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An implantable staple is a staple-like device intended to connect internal tissues to aid healing. It is not absorbable.
Predicate Devices
OptiFix AT Absorbable Fixation System with Articulating Technology (K170278)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health and Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
July 16, 2019
Davol Inc., Subsidiary of C.R. Bard Angelica Hutchison Regulatory Affairs Specialist 100 Crossings Blvd Warwick, Rhode Island 02886
Re: K191287
Trade/Device Name: OptiFix AT Absorbable Fixation System with Articulating Technology - 30 Fasteners, OptiFix AT Absorbable Fixation System with Articulating Technology - 15 Fasteners Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4750 Regulation Name: Implantable Staple Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GDW Dated: June 14, 2019 Received: June 17, 2019
Dear Angelica Hutchison:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
For Nina Mezu-Nwaba, PharmD., MPH., MSc, CAPT., United States Public Health Service Assistant Director (Acting), Plastic Surgery Implant Devices Team Division of Infection Control and Plastic Surgery Devices Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K191287
#### Device Name
OptiFix AT Absorbable Fixation System with Articulating Technology
Indications for Use (Describe)
The OptiFix AT Absorbable Fixation System with Articulating Technology is indicated for the approximation of soft tissue and fixation of surgical mesh to tissues during open or laparoscopic surgical procedures, such as hernia repair.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) Summary Section 5
### I. SUBMITTER
Davol Inc., a Subsidiary of C.R. Bard, Inc. 100 Crossings Boulevard Warwick, RI 02886
Angelica Hutchison Contact Person: Regulatory Affairs Specialist
| Phone: | (401) 825-8537 |
|---------|---------------------------|
| Fax: | (401) 825-8765 |
| E-mail: | angelica.hutchison@bd.com |
May 10, 2019 Date Prepared:
### II. DEVICE
| Name of Device: | OptiFix™ AT Absorbable Fixation System |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Common or Usual Name: | Implantable Staple |
| Classification Name: | Implantable Staple (21 CFR §878.4750) |
| Regulatory Class: | II |
| Product Code: | GDW |
### III. PREDICATE DEVICE
The predicate device for this submission is the OptiFix™ AT Absorbable Fixation System with Articulating Technology (K170278) cleared May 31, 2017. The predicate device has not been previously released to market and has not been subject to a design-related recall.
The reference device used in this submission is OptiFix™ Absorbable Fixation System (K142873), cheared on March 12, 2015; marketed by Davol Inc. This reference device has not been subject to a design related recall.
### IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The OptiFix™ AT Absorbable Fixation System with Articulating Technology, herein after referred to as "OptiFix™ AT", is a sterile (via gamma) single use device that is comprised of a deployment component and an absorbable fastener component. The device is available in either 15 or 30 preloaded fasteners. The tip of the shaft can be articulated, and the handle of the device can be rotated 360 degrees to facilitate access for fixation during surgery. The fasteners are designed with retention features and are manufactured from Poly (L-lactide and glycolide) and are dyed with D&C Violet No. 2.
The proposed device description is identical to what was previously cleared for the predicate device via K170278.
### V. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The OptiFix™ AT Absorbable Fixation System with Articulating Technology is indicated for the The Open in - A - A - A soft tissue and fixation of surgical mesh to tissues during open and laparoscopic
{4}------------------------------------------------
surgical procedures, such as hernia repair. This indication is identical to the predicate device, OptiFix™ AT, K170278.
The intended use of the OptiFix™ AT device as covered by this Special 510(k) submission is identical to the predicate device, OptiFix™ AT, K170278. Both devices are intended for the approximation of to firsue and fixation of surgical mesh to tissues during open or laparoscopic surgical procedures, such as hernia repair.
# VI. SUMMARY COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
The proposed OptiFix" AT device has the same indications for use, fundamental scientific technology and performance characteristics as the original OptiFix™ AT device, cleared via K170278. The and portormaned ogical characteristics of the OptiFix™ AT device are the same as the predicate device: device materials, delivery system design, principle of operation, biocompatibility, and sterilization. Modifications have been made to K170278 OptiFix™ AT device in order to optimize device performance. These modifications, which are the subject of this submission, are as follows:
- Updated packaging configuration .
- The Instructions for Use (IFU) was updated for clarification and to provide additional . information relating to changes to the device user interface
- Minor dimensional and manufacturability changes to the fastener and delivery system to . optimize fastener deployment
- Removal of the fastener level indicator .
| Device Features | OptiFix™ AT<br>(Predicate Device)<br>K170278 | OptiFix™ AT<br>(Proposed Device) |
|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Intended Use | Soft tissue fixation | Same |
| Indication for Use | Indicated for the approximation of<br>soft tissue and fixation of surgical<br>mesh to tissues during open or<br>laparoscopic surgical procedures,<br>such as hernia repair. | Same |
| Fastener Material<br>and Dye | Poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide)<br>(PLG)<br>D&C Violet No. 2<br>Conforms to 21 CFR §74.1602 | Same |
| Fastener Body<br>Contact | Long term implant (>30 days)<br>contacting tissue and/or bone | Same |
| Fastener<br>Shape/Design and<br>Dimensions | Overall fastener length: 7.1 mm<br>Fastener head: 3.5 mm diameter | Same |
| Fastener<br>Absorption Time | 360 days | Same |
Table 5-1: Summary Comparison of Predicate OptiFix™ AT (K170278) and Proposed OptiFix™ AT - General Characteristics
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Device Features | OptiFix ™ AT (Predicate Device) K170278 | OptiFix ™ AT (Proposed Device) |
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Fastener Quantity per Device | 15 & 30 fasteners | Same |
| Deployment Component Handle Design | Pistol/Gun shape with 360 rotation option | Same |
| Deployment Component Shaft | 37 cm in length, 6 cm of articulation | Same |
| Device Sterilization | Gamma Irradiation | Same |
| Device Packaging Configuration | Primary Packaging: Device is placed into a cardboard insert which is inserted into a foil pouch. Secondary Packaging: Placed into a paperboard printed shelf carton. | Primary Packaging: Device is placed into a PETG tray which is inserted into a foil pouch. Secondary Packaging: Same. |
## VII. PERFORMANCE DATA
### Performance Standards
No performance standards have been established for this device under Section 514 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
### Biocompatibility Testing
The OptiFix™ AT device was evaluated and successfully completed biocompatibility testing in accordance with the FDA Guidance "Use of International Standard ISO 10993, 'Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing." June 16, 2016; and International Standard ISO 10993-1 "Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 1: Evaluation and Testing Within a Risk Management Process," as recognized by FDA.
### Product Testing
The following non-clinical tests were completed for the proposed OptiFix™ AT device:
- Design Verification Testing .
- Design Validation Testing .
The proposed OptiFix™ AT device passed all the test requirements and demonstrated that the proposed device design meets product specifications and intended uses. All samples tested met the established acceptance criteria.
### Package Integrity Testing
Package Qualification testing has been completed for the proposed OptiFix™ AT device in accordance with the following FDA consensus standards: ISO 11607-1+A1:2014 "Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices Part 1: Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and packaging systems" and ISO 11607-2:2006+A1:2014 "Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices Part 2: Validation requirements for forming, sealing, and assembly processes".
{6}------------------------------------------------
### Animal Study
Allinial order. I he proposed Open in - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - in material and design. No additional animal studies were performed in support of this submission.
### Clinical Studies
Clinical studies were not performed for the submission of this device nor were clinical studies performed for the predicate device.
### VIII. CONCLUSIONS
The results of verification and validation testing demonstrate that the proposed OptiFix™ AT device is I he readly equivalent to the predicate device that has been previously cleared for the same intended uses.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.