K191138 · Airxpanders, Inc. · PQN · Jul 11, 2019 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K191138
Device Name
AeroForm Tissue Expander, Smooth
Applicant
Airxpanders, Inc.
Product Code
PQN · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Jul 11, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 878.3510
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The AeroForm® Tissue Expander System, Smooth is used for soft tissue expansion in breast reconstruction following mastectomy, for treatment of underdeveloped breasts, and for the treatment of soft tissue deformities in the breast. The AeroForm Tissue Expander, Smooth is intended for temporary subcutaneous or submuscular implantation and is not intended for use beyond six months.
Device Story
AeroForm Tissue Expander System, Smooth is a sterile, temporary implant for breast reconstruction. System includes an implantable silicone expander, a remote controller, and a master key. Expander contains an internal reservoir of compressed CO2 gas. Physician implants device subcutaneously or submuscularly. Patient uses remote controller to trigger release of 10cc increments of CO2 gas into the expander, up to 30cc per day, to gradually stretch overlying skin and muscle. Once adequate tissue coverage is achieved, the expander is removed and replaced with a permanent breast implant. Device provides a needle-free, patient-controlled expansion process compared to traditional saline-filled expanders.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data presented. Performance verified via mechanical testing including simulated use, endurance/stress tests, dimensional measurements, and shell integrity testing (tensile set, break force) in accordance with ASTM F1441 standards.
Technological Characteristics
Silicone outer shell; internal gas barrier with compressed CO2 reservoir. Actuation via remote controller using internal electronics and receiving antenna. Dimensions and volume ranges identical to predicate. Single-use, sterile, temporary implant. Software-controlled inflation dosing (10cc increments, max 30cc/day).
Indications for Use
Indicated for soft tissue expansion in breast reconstruction post-mastectomy, treatment of underdeveloped breasts, and treatment of breast soft tissue deformities. Intended for temporary subcutaneous or submuscular implantation for up to six months.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A carbon dioxide gas controlled tissue expander is a prescription device intended for temporary subcutaneous or submuscular implantation to stretch the skin for surgical applications, specifically to develop surgical flaps and additional tissue coverage. The device is made of an inflatable elastomer shell and is filled with carbon dioxide gas. The device utilizes a remote controller to administer doses of carbon dioxide gas from an implanted canister inside the device.
Special Controls
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act, the carbon dioxide gas controlled tissue expander is subject to the following special controls:
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) In-vivo performance testing must be conducted to obtain the adverse event profile associated with use, and demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use.
(2) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(3) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of patient-contacting components of the device.
(4) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested:
(i) Cycle testing of expander showing that there are no leaks or tears after repeated cycling;
(ii) Mechanical assessment of implanted carbon dioxide (CO
2 ) canister including high impact testing;(iii) Leak testing of expander showing that device does not leak CO
2 ;(iv) Assessment of gas permeability during expansion and after full expansion; and
(v) Mechanical assessment of expander (tensile set, breaking force, shell joint test, and fused or adhered joint testing).
(5) Performance data must be provided to demonstrate the electromagnetic compatibility, electrical safety, and wireless compatibility of the device.
(6) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
(7) Performance data must support shelf life by demonstrating continued sterility of the device or the sterile components, package integrity, and device functionality over the identified shelf life.
(8) Human factors testing and analysis must validate that the device design and labeling are sufficient for the end user.
(9) Physician labeling must include:
(i) The operating parameters, name, and model number of the indicated external dosage controller;
(ii) Information on how the device operates and the typical course of treatment;
(iii) Information on the population for which the device has been demonstrated to be effective;
(iv) A detailed summary of the device technical parameters; and
(v) Provisions for choosing an appropriate size implant that would be exchanged for the tissue expander.
(10) Patient labeling must include:
(i) Warnings, precautions, and contraindications, and adverse events/complications;
(ii) Information on how the device operates and the typical course of treatment;
(iii) The probable risks and benefits associated with the use of the device;
(iv) Post-operative care instructions; and
(v) Alternative treatments.
(11) Patient training must include instructions for device use, when it may be necessary to contact a physician, and cautionary measures to take when the device is implanted.
Artoura Breast Tissue Expander with Smooth Surface (K161176)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
July 11, 2019
AirXpanders, Inc. Belinda Pinedo Director, Regulatory Affairs 3047 Orchard Parkway San Jose, California 95134
Re: K191138
Trade/Device Name: AeroForm Tissue Expander, Smooth Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.3510 Regulation Name: Carbon Dioxide Gas-Controlled Tissue Expander Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PON Dated: June 10, 2019 Received: June 11, 2019
Dear Belinda Pinedo:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Nina Mezu-Nwaba, PharmD., MPH., MSc. CAPT., United States Public Health Service Assistant Director (Acting), Plastic Surgery Implant Devices Team Division of Infection Control and Plastic Surgery Devices Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 06/30/2020 See PRA Statement below.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
#### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K191138
Device Name AeroForm Tissue® Expander System, Smooth
Indications for Use (Describe)
The AeroForm® Tissue Expander System, Smooth is used for soft tissue expansion in breast reconstruction following mastectomy, for the treatment of underdeveloped breasts and for the treatment of soft tissue deformities in the breast.
The AeroForm® Tissue Expander, Smooth is intended for temporary subcutaneous or submuscular implantation and is not intended for use beyond six months
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span> <span style="text-decoration: underline;"></span> <span style="font-family: DejaVu Sans, sans-serif;">✔</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> <span> <span style="text-decoration: underline;"></span> <span style="font-family: DejaVu Sans, sans-serif;">▢</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
***DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.***
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the
time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete
and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
[PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov](mailto:PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov)
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
| FORM FDA 3881 (7/17) | Page 1 of 1 | PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 | EF |
|----------------------|-------------|----------------------------------------|----|
|----------------------|-------------|----------------------------------------|----|
---
Indications For Use Statement
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### 3.1 510(k) Summary
#### DATE OF SUMMARY
April 29, 2019
# 510(K) Applicant
AirXpanders, Inc. 3047 Orchard Parkway San Jose, California 95134 Phone: (650) 282-8131
Contact Person: Belinda Pinedo Phone: (650) 282-8131 E-mail: bpinedo@airxpanders.com
## Subject Device Overview
| Trade Name: | AeroForm® Tissue Expander System, Smooth |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Expander, Skin, Inflatable |
| Classification: | II |
| Product Code: | PQN |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 878.3510 |
| Regulation Name: | Carbon Dioxide Gas Controlled Tissue Expander |
# Predicate Device
The predicate device for this premarket submission is:
| Trade Name | Submitter | 510(k) Number | 510(k)<br>Clearance Date |
|----------------------------------|-------------------|---------------|--------------------------|
| AeroForm® Tissue Expander System | AirXpanders, Inc. | K170075 | 04/03/2017 |
# Reference Devices
There are other tissue expanders with a smooth shell construction that have been cleared as a Special 510(k); these are referenced below.
| Trade Name | Manufacturer<br>Name | 510(k)<br>Number | 510(k)<br>Clearance Date |
|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------|------------------|--------------------------|
| Natrelle 133S Tissue Expander | Allergan | K182054 | 08/29/2018 |
| Artoura Breast Tissue Expander with Smooth Surface | Mentor | K161176 | 05/23/2016 |
{4}------------------------------------------------
# DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The AeroForm Tissue Expander System, Smooth is a sterile, temporary implant for breast reconstruction. This device is comprised of an implantable tissue expander (Expander), a remote control (Controller), and a Master Key. The AeroForm Tissue Expander, Smooth is constructed of an outer silicone shell and an inner gas barrier (bag) with an internal reservoir of compressed Carbon Dioxide (CO2) gas. The CO2 gas is released within the Expander by using the remote control (Controller), resulting in gradual expansion of the Expander. In a typical, two-stage breast reconstruction, a tissue expander device is placed under the pectoralis major muscle and remaining skin following a mastectomy procedure. The Expander is gradually expanded over time through the release of carbon dioxide, causing the overlying skin and muscle to stretch. When adequate tissue coverage is achieved, the expansion device is removed and replaced with a breast implant.
# Intended Use / Indications for Use
The AeroForm® Tissue Expander System, Smooth is used for soft tissue expansion in breast reconstruction following mastectomy, for treatment of underdeveloped breasts, and for the treatment of soft tissue deformities in the breast.
The AeroForm Tissue Expander, Smooth is intended for temporary subcutaneous or submuscular implantation and is not intended for use beyond six months.
# TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The subject AeroForm Tissue Expander, Smooth has a modified outer shell that has a smooth surface finish, as opposed to the predicate AeroForm Tissue Expander which has a textured outer shell. This change does not alter the fundamental scientific technology of the device. The subject Expander is made of the same material as the predicate device, but eliminates the final outer shell texture processing, which results in a smooth outer shell surface.
Both the AeroForm Tissue Expander, Smooth and the predicate AeroForm device expand with the same internal operating mechanism which includes an internal Driver reservoir that contains a gas medium that when actuated, releases incremental inflations that gradually stretch the surrounding tissue.
The AeroForm Tissue Expander System, Smooth uses software and electronics to provide controlled, gradual expansion by pressing the button on the Controller, allowing carbon dioxide (CO2) to be released from a reservoir inside the Expander. A small amount of CO2 (10cc) is released and the Controller is programmed to allow the patient to dose up to 30cc per day. The Controller provides power to the Expander, which has a receiving antenna and electronics to enable communication with the Controller. The AeroForm Tissue Expander System, Smooth has been evaluated against safety and performance testibed in the tissue expander standard, as well as design verification and validation testing criteria in accordance with
{5}------------------------------------------------
internal company controls and design control procedures to support the safety and intended use of the product.
#### PERFORMANCE DATA
#### Mechanical Performance Testing
Testing was performed, as required, to verify and validate that the design outputs of the modified device meet the design input requirements. Performance testing for the smooth Expander included evaluation of the device through performance and functional testing as described in ASTM F1441, Standard Specification for Soft Tissue Expanders. The following mechanical tests were performed:
- Simulated Use Testing .
- Endurance / Stress Tests .
- Dimensional Measurement .
- Shell Tensile Set, Shell Break Force, Non-Critical Fused or Adhered Joints ●
All mechanical performance testing results met their pre-determined acceptance criteria and the requirements of the ASTM F1441 standard for tissue expanders, demonstrating that the modified device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
#### COMPARISON TO PREDICATE DEVICE
The AeroForm Tissue Expander System, Smooth has the same intended use and indications for use as the predicate device: intended for skin/tissue expansion. The System is a single-use device and is intended for subcutaneous or submuscular implantation and is not intended for use beyond six months.
The subject and predicate devices are based on the following comparable technological elements:
- . Same operating principle
- Same outer shell elastomeric material ●
- Same dimensional and volume ranges ●
- . Suture tabs to attach device to surrounding tissue
- . Compliance with recognized standards and test requirements.
The principle of operation for both the AeroForm Tissue Expander, Smooth and predicate device is the same: the silicone shell of the Expanders gradually increases
{6}------------------------------------------------
in size with incremental filling of gas, resulting in stretching of the surrounding tissue. The main difference between the AeroForm Tissue Expander, Smooth and the predicate device is the change in the surface texture of the outer shell. The predicate device is made of a textured outer shell, and the subject device is made of a smooth outer shell where no texture is applied.
There are no technological differences between the subject device and the predicate device. The subject AeroForm Tissue Expander has not introduced any new harms or risks and does not raise new types of safety or effectiveness questions compared to the predicate device.
## CONCLUSION
The subject AeroForm Tissue Expander System has an identical intended use and indications for use, principles of operation, performance, and technological characteristics with the exception of the shell surface texture, as the predicate device. No new risks were introduced as a result of the device modifications discussed in this submisssion. Performance testing supports the risk assessment and demonstrate that the functionality, integrity, safety and effectiveness of the subject AeroForm Tissue Expander System, Smooth as compared to the predicate device are adequate for its intended use.
Therefore, this device is considered substantially equivalent to the AirXpander's predicate AeroForm Tissue Expander device that was FDA cleared on April 3, 2017 in 510(k) #K170075.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.