K191016 · Heraeus Medical GmbH · KWY · Nov 1, 2019 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K191016
Device Name
COPAL exchange G Hip and Knee Spacers
Applicant
Heraeus Medical GmbH
Product Code
KWY · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Nov 1, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3390
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
COPAL® exchange G knee (polymethylmethacrylate/gentamicin) is indicated for temporary use (maximum of 180 days) as a total knee replacement (TKR) in skeletally mature patients undergoing a two-stage procedure due to a septic process. COPAL® exchange G knee is applied on the femoral condyles and on the tibial plate following removal of the existing implant and radical debridement. The device is intended for use in conjunction with systemic antimicrobial antibiotic therapy (standard treatment approach to an infection). COPAL® exchange G knee is not intended for use for more than 180 days, at which time it must be explanted, and a permanent device implanted, or another appropriate treatment performed (e.g., resection arthroplasty, fusion, etc.). COPAL® exchange G knee is only indicated for patients who will consistently use traditional mobility assist devices e.g. crutches, walkers, canes) throughout the implantation period. COPAL® exchange G hip (polymethylmethacrylate / gentamicin) is indicated for temporary use (maximum of 180 days) as a total hip replacement (THR) in skeletally mature patients undergoing a two-stage procedure due to a septic process. The device is inserted into the femoral medullary canal and acetabular cavity following removal of the existing implant and radical debridement. The device is assigned to be used in conjunction with systemic antimicrobial antibiotic therapy (standard treatment approach to an infection). COPAL® exchange G hip is not intended for use for more than 180 days, at which time it must be explanted, and a permanent device implanted, or another appropriate treatment performed (e.g., resection arthroplasty, fusion, perm etc.). COPAL®exchange G hip is only indicated for patients who will consistently use traditional mobility assist devices (e.g. crutches, walkers, canes) throughout the implantation period.
Device Story
Combination device consisting of gentamicin-loaded PMMA bone cement; hip spacer includes AISI 316L stainless steel reinforcing structure. Used as temporary implant during two-stage revision surgery for infected total joint arthroplasty. Placed by orthopedic surgeons in clinical setting to maintain joint space, alignment, and soft tissue tension; allows partial weight-bearing and limited mobility. Gentamicin provides local antibiotic release to protect device from bacterial colonization. Must be explanted within 180 days and replaced with permanent prosthesis. Benefits include patient comfort, maintenance of joint space, and prevention of muscular contraction during infection treatment.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data provided. Biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993 (cytotoxicity, irritation, sensitization, systemic toxicity, mutagenicity). Mechanical testing per ISO 14879-1, ISO 7206-4/6, ISO 14242-1, ISO 14243-1 (compressive strength, cyclic fatigue, abrasion). Sterilization validation per ISO 11135/AAMI TIR 28. Shelf-life stability testing (36 months) confirmed sterility, compressive strength, and gentamicin content.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate), gentamicin sulfate, AISI 316L stainless steel (hip inlay). Form: Pre-formed hip and knee spacers. Sterilization: Ethylene oxide (SAL 10^-6). Standards: ISO 10993 (biocompatibility), ISO 14879-1/7206 (mechanical), ISO 11135 (sterilization), ISO 11607 (sterile barrier).
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients undergoing two-stage revision arthroplasty for septic joint infection. Temporary use (max 180 days) as total hip or knee replacement. Requires concurrent systemic antibiotic therapy and consistent use of mobility aids (crutches, walkers, canes).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint femoral (hemi-hip) metal/polymer cemented or uncemented prosthesis is a two-part device intended to be implanted to replace the head and neck of the femur. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a femoral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a snap-fit acetabular component made of an alloy, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. This generic type of device may be fixed to the bone with bone cement (§ 888.3027) or implanted by impaction.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Heraeus Medical GmbH % Mary McNamara-Cullinane Vice President of Regulatory Affairs Alira Health 1 Grant Street Framingham, Massachusetts 01702
Re: K191016
Trade/Device Name: COPAL® exchange G Hip Spacers Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3390 Regulation Name: Hip joint femoral (hemi-hip) metal/polymer cemented or uncemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KWY, KWL
Trade/Device Name: COPAL® exchange G Knee Spacers Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3560 Regulation Name: Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JWH
Dated: October 1, 2019 Received: October 2, 2019
Dear Ms. McNamara-Cullinane:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
{1}------------------------------------------------
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Laurence D. Coyne, Ph.D. Acting Director DHT6C: Division of Restorative, Repair and Trauma Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K191016
Device Name: COPAL® exchange G Hip and Knee Spacers
Indications for Use:
#### COPAL® exchange G Knee Spacer:
COPAL® exchange G knee (polymethylmethacrylate/gentamicin) is indicated for temporary use (maximum of 180 days) as a total knee replacement (TKR) in skeletally mature patients undergoing a two-stage procedure due to a septic process. COPAL® exchange G knee is applied on the femoral condyles and on the tibial plate following removal of the existing implant and radical debridement. The device is intended for use in conjunction with systemic antimicrobial antibiotic therapy (standard treatment approach to an infection).
COPAL® exchange G knee is not intended for use for more than 180 days, at which time it must be explanted, and a permanent device implanted, or another appropriate treatment performed (e.g., resection arthroplasty, fusion, etc.). COPAL® exchange G knee is only indicated for patientswho will consistently use traditional mobility assist devices e.g. crutches, walkers, canes) throughout the implantation period.
#### COPAL® exchange G Hip Spacer:
COPAL® exchange G hip (polymethylmethacrylate / gentamicin) is indicated for temporary use (maximum of 180 days) as a total hip replacement (THR) in skeletally mature patients undergoing a two-stage procedure due to a septic process. The device is inserted into the femoral medullary canal and acetabular cavity following removal of the existing implant and radical debridement. The device is assigned to be used in conjunction with systemic antimicrobial antibiotic therapy (standard treatment approach to an infection). COPAL® exchange G hip is not intended for use for more than 180 days, at which time it must be explanted, and a permanent device implanted, or another appropriate treatment performed (e.g., resection arthroplasty, fusion, perm etc.). COPAL®exchange G hip is only indicated for patients who will consistently use traditional mobility assist devices (e.g. crutches, walkers, canes) throughout the implantation period.
Prescription Use ____X___ (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR AND/OR AND/OR AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD AND/ORD A
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary for the Heraeus COPAL® exchange G Hip and Knee Spacers (per 21CFR 807.92)
## 1. SUBMITTER/510(K) HOLDER
Heraeus Medical GmbH Philipp-Reis-Str. 8/13 61273 Wehrheim Germany
Contact Person: Ljuba Litau Telephone: + 49 (0) 6181 / 35 - 23 39 Date Prepared: October 1, 2019
## 2. DEVICE NAME
| Proprietary Name: | COPAL® exchange G Hip and Knee Spacers |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------|
|-------------------|----------------------------------------|
Classification Name: Hip and Knee Spacers
Hip and Knee Spacers Common/Usual Name:
Classification Name:
· Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis.
· Hip joint femoral (hemi-hip) metal/polymer cemented or uncemented prosthesis.
| Classification Regulation: | 21 CFR 888.3560 and 21 CFR 888.3390 |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Product codes: | JWH, KWL and KWY |
## 3. PREDICATE DEVICES
· Tecres Hip and Knee Spacers subject of K101356 (including its former versions K062274, K062273 and K031841)
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### 4. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The COPAL® exchange G Hip and Knee Spacers are combination products that provide patients, undergoing a two-stage revision procedure for an infected total joint, a temporary implant to 1) allow for partial weight bearing and 2) provide an approximate natural range of motion. The devices also maintain a patient's soft tissue and joint space, preventing further complications such as muscular contraction. The gentamicin protects the device from bacterial colonization.
The COPAL® exchange G Hip and Knee Spacers are placed into the joint to maintain normal joint space and alignment. They provide patient comfort and limited mobility while the infection is being treated. The COPAL® exchange G Hip and Knee Spacers are made with bone cement that are loaded with gentamicin antibiotics. The COPAL® exchange G Hip and Knee Spacers are temporary joint prostheses designed to temporarily replace an infected implant during a total hip or knee arthroplasty and provide the patient with limited mobility and predictable, consistent local antibiotic release
# COPAL® exchange G Hip Spacer
COPAL® exchange G Hip Spacer is a single use device that mimics a hemi-hip prosthesis and is available in 8 sizes and usable for both left and right hips.
The COPAL® exchange G Hip Spacers are combination products made of fully formed polymethylmethacrylate (radiopaque PMMA with gentamicin). The COPAL® exchange G Hip Spacers contain an inner stainless steel (AISI 316L stainless steel) reinforcing structure. The mass used in the filling of the molds (the PMMA unformed resin) is prepared from a powder component and a liquid component. The liquid component consists of methyl methacrylate, N, N-dimethyl-p-toluidine, hydroquinone. The powder component consists of polymethymethacrylate, calcium carbonite, benzoyl peroxide, and gentamicin sulphate. The raw materials and a summary of the manufacturing process are found below.
# COPAL® exchange G Knee Spacer
COPAL® exchange G Knee Spacer is a single use device that is comprised of a tibia and femur component and is available in 3 sizes to form one knee spacer that is usable for left and right knee.
# 5. INTENDED USE
{5}------------------------------------------------
## COPAL® exchange G Knee Spacer:
COPAL® exchange G knee (polymethylmethacrylate/gentamicin) is indicated for temporary use (maximum of 180 days) as a total knee replacement (TKR) in skeletally mature patients undergoing a two-stage procedure due to a septic process. COPAL® exchange G knee is applied on the femoral condyles and on the tibial plate following removal of the existing implant and radical debridement. The device is intended for use in conjunction with systemic antimicrobial antibiotic therapy (standard treatment approach to an infection).
COPAL® exchange G knee is not intended for use for more than 180 days, at which time it must be explanted, and a permanent device implanted, or another appropriate treatment performed (e.g., resection arthroplasty, fusion, etc.). COPAL® exchange G knee is only indicated for patients who will consistently use traditional mobility assist devices e.g. crutches, walkers, canes) throughout the implantation period.
## COPAL® exchange G Hip Spacer:
COPAL® exchange G hip (polymethylmethacrylate / gentamicin) is indicated for temporary use (maximum of 180 days) as a total hip replacement (THR) in skeletally mature patients undergoing a two-stage procedure due to a septic process. The device is inserted into the femoral medullary canal and acetabular cavity following removal of the existing implant and radical debridement. The device is assigned to be used in conjunction with systemic antimicrobial antibiotic therapy (standard treatment approach to an infection). COPAL® exchange G hip is not intended for use for more than 180 days, at which time it must be explanted, and a permanent device implanted, or another appropriate treatment performed (e.g., resection arthroplasty, fusion, perm etc.). COPAL® exchange G hip is only indicated for patients who will consistently use traditional mobility assist devices (e.g. crutches, walkers, canes) throughout the implantation period.
# 6. TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The Heraeus COPAL® exchange G Spacers are substantially equivalent to the predicate device with respect to the following:
The intended use is equivalent in that they are both indicated for temporary use (maximum of 180 days) as a total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) for skeletally mature patients undergoing a two-stage procedure due to a septic process. The proposed and predicate devices are intended for use in conjunction with systemic antimicrobial antibiotic therapy (standard treatment approach to an infection).
The technological characteristics of the Heraeus COPAL® exchange G Spacers and the predicate product are identical in that they are all designed to mimic a permanent
{6}------------------------------------------------
implant that include an antibiotic for use in infected joints for a period of up to 180 days. The configurations consist of hip and knee components that mimic the intended anatomical space. The proposed Heraeus COPAL® exchange G Spacers and the predicate devices both contain an antibiotic component that helps to facilitate the healing process. The dressings are PMMA products which provide position and structure to the anatomical area. There are no major differences between the proposed and the predicate devices and are essentially identical in materials and design.
The operational characteristics of the Heraeus COPAL® exchange G Spacers are equivalent to the predicate device. Both Spacers provide patients, undergoing a twostage revision procedure for an infected total joint, a temporary implant to: 1) allow for partial weight bearing and 2) provide an approximate natural range of motion. The devices also maintain a patient's soft tissue and joint space, preventing further complications such as muscular contraction. The gentamicin protects the device from bacterial colonization.
The Heraeus COPAL® exchange G Spacers and the predicate devices are placed into the joint to maintain normal joint space and alignment. They provide patient comfort and limited mobility while the infection is being treated. The COPAL® and predicate Spacers are made with bone cement and the Tecres spacers are loaded with gentamicin antibiotics.
The technological characteristics of the proposed Heraeus COPAL® exchange G Spacers are equivalent to the predicate device: the Hip Spacers are comprised of PMMA, gentamicin and a stainless-steel inlay and the Knee Spacers are comprised of PMMA and gentamicin. The design and operational characteristics are equivalent for the proposed and predicate devices in that they mimic the permanent implants and are intended to be used as temporary implants in conjunction with systemic antibiotic therapy. The proposed and predicate devices are provided in a range of sizes that are compatible with skeletally mature adults. All of these technological characteristics are equal fit, form and function resulting in the Heraeus COPAL® exchange G Spacers being substantially equivalent to the Tecres Hip and Knee Spacers.
#### 7. PERFORMANCE TESTING
Testing was conducted according to the FDA recognized standards in order to demonstrate equivalence to the predicate devices. These tests include:
Biocompatibility testing is performed in accordance with the FDA Guidance, "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1.
{7}------------------------------------------------
The following testing was conducted according to the FDA recognized standards in order to demonstrate equivalence to the predicate devices:
- . Biocompatibility testing was performed in accordance with the FDA Guidance, "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1-2016, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process"" including cytotoxicity, irritation, hypersensitivity, acute and subchronic systemic toxicity and mutation assays.
- O The in vitro cytotoxicity was performed according to ISO 10993-5-2009. No leachable substances were dissolved in cytotoxic amounts under the test conditions.
- An irritation test according to ISO 10993-10, -1, -12 (Intracutaneous Reactivity) was O carried out. Under the conditions of the test the polar as well as the nonpolar extracts of the test item caused no signs of irritation. The test item is classified as not irritant.
- A test for delayed-type hypersensitivity (Guinea Pig Maximization Test) was carried out о according ISO10993- 10, -1, -12. Under the conditions of the test, no reactions were identified as sensitization.
- A test of acute systemic toxicity was performed according to the guidelines ISO 10993-11, O -1, -12 and ASTM F750-87 (reapproved 2012). Under the conditions of the study, it can be stated that the test item showed no acute systemic toxic characteristics.
- A reverse mutation assay was carried out according ISO10993-3, -1, -12. The results are O considered to be non-mutagenic.
- An in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay was carried out according to ISO10993- O 3 -1, -12. Under the conditions of the assay, the extracts of the test item are considered to be non-mutagenic.
- A femoral bone implantation study combined with an assessment of subchronic systemic о toxicity were carried out according to ISO10993- 6, 11, -1, -12. At the implantation sites, there were no inflammatory or degenerative findings encountered.
- In summary, it can be stated that the COPAL® exchange G spacers are biocompatible O according to ISO10993-2016. The proposed COPAL® exchange G spacers and the predicate devices were both tested for biocompatibility according to ISO10993.
- Sterilization Validation was performed in accordance to ISO 11135 and AAMI TIR 28. The ● sterilization was carried out by gassing with ethylene oxide. The sterilization cycle is designed to deliver sterile units, starting with a defined bioburden and ending with a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10-6.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Based on the tests performed and the results obtained, the chosen sterilization process can be considered as valid.
- The shelf life of the COPAL® exchange G spacers was tested at 25 ± 2 °C over a period of 36 ● months. The test times were 0 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months. The sterility according to DIN EN ISO 11737. Part 2, the compressive strength according to ISO 7206-6 and ISO 14879-1, the gentamicin content and the content of gentamicin impurities were tested with an HPLC analysis method. All examined hip spacers and knee spacers were sterile throughout the storage period. The compressive strength of the hip spacers and knee spacers was within the specified range. The gentamicin content and gentamicin impurities remained within the specified range over the entire storage period. In summary, the COPAL® exchange G spacers were stable at a temperature of 25 ± 2 ° and a humidity of 50 % for a period of 36 months.
- Validation of the sterile barrier were performed according to ISO 11607-1 and ISO 11607-2 to ● show the integrity of the system. In addition, the maintenance of the sterile barrier system through transport and shelf life over 5 years was investigated.
- Mechanical tests were conducted in order to demonstrate that the Heraeus COPAL® exchange ● G Spacers function as intended and are safe and effective for their intended use.
- The compressive strength of the COPAL® exchange G spacers were tested in accordance O with ISO 14879-1, ISO 7206-4 and ISO 7206-6. The results show that COPAL® exchange G spacers are equivalent to the predicate devices.
- The cyclic fatigue tests were performed according to ISO 14879-1 and ISO 14242-1:2012. O Regarding the cyclic fatigue, the COPAL® exchange G spacers are equivalent compared to the predicate devices.
- Abrasion tests were performed according to ISO 14243-1:2009 and ISO 14242-1:2012. O The results show that COPAL® exchange G spacers are equivalent to the predicate devices.
In summary, the verification and validation testing performed demonstrate that the Heraeus COPAL® exchange G Spacers function as intended and is safe and effective for their intended use and where appropriate were tested and found to be substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
#### 8. CONCLUSION OF SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
The Heraeus COPAL® exchange G Spacers have been shown to be substantially equivalent to the predicate devices. Substantial equivalence has been demonstrated through a comparison of intended use, design and technological characteristics, as well as performance testing. The information provided within this premarket notification supports
{9}------------------------------------------------
substantial equivalence of the subject device to the predicate devices. and demonstrates them to be essentially identical.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.