The sponsor used a large cohort of clinical specimens (n=961) from diverse patient populations to establish clinical performance (PPA/NPA) by comparing the new device to the predicate Elecsys Anti-HAV assay.
Method comparison study using prospective, retrospective, and remnant specimens
961 subjects including routine HAV testing, hospitalized, increased risk, symptomatic, characterized acute HAV infected, and pediatric patients; Sample Size: 961; Number of Sites: 3
Elecsys Anti-HAV assay (predicate)
Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) and Negative Percent Agreement (NPA)
Prospective collection of serum specimens to evaluate prevalence
Presumed healthy adults (n=800); Sample Size: 800; Number of Sites: 2
Not applicable for this study
Prevalence of HAV antibodies
Indications for Use
Immunoassay for the in vitro qualitative detection of total antibodies (IgG and IgM) to hepatitis A virus (HAV) in human pediatric (ages 2 through 21 years) and adult serum and plasma (Li-Heparin, potassium EDTA, Na-Citrate, Na-Heparin). The assay, in conjunction with other serological and clinical information, is indicated as an aid in the clinical laboratory diagnosis of acute or past hepatitis A virus infection in persons with signs or symptoms of hepatitis and in persons at increased risk for hepatitis A infection, or as an aid to identify HAV susceptible individuals and to determine the presence of an antibody response to HAV in vaccine recipients. The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay "ECLIA" is intended for use on the cobas e immunoassay analyzers. Assay performance characteristics have not been established for immunocompromised or immunosuppressed patients. This assay has not been FDA cleared or approved for the screening of blood or plasma donors.
Device Story
Elecsys Anti-HAV II is an in vitro diagnostic immunoassay for qualitative detection of total anti-HAV antibodies (IgG/IgM) in human serum/plasma. Operated on cobas e 601 analyzers by laboratory personnel. Uses competition principle: sample antibodies compete with biotinylated monoclonal anti-HAV antibodies for binding to HAV antigen; ruthenium-labeled monoclonal anti-HAV antibodies bind to remaining HAV antigen. Electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA) signal inversely proportional to antibody concentration in sample. Software automatically calculates results by comparing signal to cutoff value from calibration. Used in clinical labs to aid diagnosis of acute/past HAV infection, identify susceptibility, or confirm vaccine response. Benefits include rapid (18-minute) automated testing, supporting clinical decision-making for hepatitis management.
Clinical Evidence
Method comparison study of 961 subjects (prospective, retrospective, remnant) across three sites using cobas e 601. Compared to predicate Elecsys Anti-HAV. Overall PPA 99.8% (501/502) and NPA 95.2% (437/459). Cohorts included routine, hospitalized, increased risk, symptomatic, acute HAV, and pediatric. Seroconversion panel testing (n=4) showed equivalent performance to predicate. Vaccination study (n=49) showed 100% agreement with predicate.
Technological Characteristics
Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) on cobas e 601 analyzer. Reagents: streptavidin-coated microparticles, HAV antigen, biotinylated monoclonal anti-HAV antibody, ruthenium-labeled monoclonal anti-HAV antibody. Sample volume: 20 µL. Calibration: 2-point, 28-day stability. Connectivity: cobas e 601 platform. Software: automated signal processing and cutoff comparison.
Indications for Use
Indicated for pediatric (ages 2-21) and adult patients requiring diagnosis of acute or past HAV infection, identification of HAV susceptibility, or assessment of vaccine-induced antibody response. Not for use in immunocompromised/immunosuppressed patients or blood/plasma donor screening.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
HAV serological assays are devices that consist of antigens and antisera for the detection of hepatitis A virus-specific IgM, IgG, or total antibodies (IgM and IgG), in human serum or plasma. These devices are used for testing specimens from individuals who have signs and symptoms consistent with acute hepatitis to determine if an individual has been previously infected with HAV, or as an aid to identify HAV-susceptible individuals. The detection of these antibodies aids in the clinical laboratory diagnosis of an acute or past infection by HAV in conjunction with other clinical laboratory findings. These devices are not intended for screening blood or solid or soft tissue donors.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control is “Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Hepatitis A Virus Serological Assays.” See § 866.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
{0}
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K190428
B Applicant
Roche Diagnostics
C Proprietary and Established Names
Elecsys Anti-HAV II
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LOL | Class II | 21 CFR 866.3310 - Hepatitis A Virus (HAV) Serological Assays | MI - Microbiology |
| QCH | Class II | 21 CFR 866.3920 - Assayed quality control material for clinical microbiology assays | MI - Microbiology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
New device
B Measurand:
Total antibodies (IgG and IgM) to hepatitis A virus (HAV)
C Type of Test:
Qualitative immunoassay using electrochemiluminescence technology
K190428 - Page 1 of 14
{1}
III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
Immunoassay for the in vitro qualitative detection of total antibodies (IgG and IgM) to hepatitis A virus (HAV) in human pediatric (ages 2 through 21 years) and adult serum and plasma (Li heparin, potassium EDTA, Na citrate, Na heparin). The assay, in conjunction with other serological and clinical information, is indicated as an aid in the clinical laboratory diagnosis of acute or past hepatitis A virus infection in persons with signs or symptoms of hepatitis and in persons at increased risk for hepatitis A infection, or as an aid to identify HAV susceptible individuals and to determine the presence of an antibody response to HAV in vaccine recipients. The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay “ECLIA” is intended for use on the cobas e immunoassay analyzers.
Assay performance characteristics have not been established for immunocompromised or immunosuppressed patients. This assay has not been FDA cleared or approved for the screening of blood or plasma donors.
B Indication(s) for Use:
Same as Intended Use
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx – For Prescription Use Only
D Special Instrument Requirements:
cobas e 601 analyzer
IV Device/System Characteristics:
A Device Description:
Elecsys Anti-HAV II is a second-generation competitive immunoassay by Roche Diagnostics for the in vitro qualitative detection of total antibodies (IgG and IgM) to the hepatitis A virus (HAV) in human pediatric and adult serum and plasma. It is intended for use on the cobas e 601 immunoassay analyzer and utilizes the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay “ECLIA” technology.
Results are determined automatically by the software by comparing the electrochemiluminescence signal obtained from the reaction product of the sample with the signal of the cutoff value previously obtained by calibration. Results are expressed as cutoff indices (COIs).
The Elecsys Anti-HAV II is intended to be used with the following calibrators and controls:
- AHAV 2 Cal1 and AHAV 2 Cal2, included in the reagent RackPack
- PreciControl Anti-HAV II, sold separately
K190428 - Page 2 of 14
{2}
B Principle of Operation:
The Elecsys Anti-HAV II assay is a qualitative, serological, competitive immunoassay:
- 1st incubation: 20 µL of sample; the sample anti-HAV binds the added HAV antigen
- 2nd incubation: After addition of biotinylated antibodies and ruthenium complex*-labeled antibodies specific for HAV antigen, together with streptavidin-coated microparticles, the still-free binding sites on the HAV antigens become occupied. The entire complex becomes bound to the solid phase via interaction of biotin and streptavidin.
- The reaction mixture is aspirated into the measuring cell where the microparticles are magnetically captured onto the surface of the electrode. Unbound substances are then removed with ProCell M. Application of a voltage to the electrode induces chemiluminescent emission which is measured by a photomultiplier.
- Results are determined automatically by the software by comparing the electrochemiluminescence signal obtained from the reaction product of the sample with the signal of the cutoff value previously obtained by calibration.
*Tris(2,2'-bipyridyl) ruthenium(II)-complex (Ru(bpy))
Interpretation of the results
| Numeric result | Result message | Interpretation / further steps |
| --- | --- | --- |
| COI*) > 1.0 | Non-reactive | Negative for HAV-specific antibodies |
| COI ≤ 1.0 | Reactive | Positive for HAV-specific antibodies |
* COI = cutoff index
The cutoff of the Elecsys Anti-HAV II assay was established with internal studies, and validation of the cutoff was performed by external clinical studies. The cutoff of COI = 1.0 corresponds to ≤ 25.4 IU/L, as established with the 2nd International Standard for Anti-Hepatitis A, Immunoglobulin, Human, NIBSC code: 97/646.
C Instrument Description Information:
| Modes of Operation | Yes | No |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device? | ☑ | ☐ |
| Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission? | ☐ | ☑ |
| Software | | |
| FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types. | ☑ | ☐ |
1. Instrument Name: cobas e 601
K190428 - Page 3 of 14
{3}
2. Specimen Identification:
Automated barcode scanning onboard the cobas e 601
3. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
Automated using the cobas e 601
4. Calibration:
Calibration is performed using the calibrators provided with the Elecsys Anti-HAV II:
AHAV 2 Cal1, negative calibrator
AHAV 2 Cal2, positive calibrator
5. Quality Control:
PreciControl Anti-HAV II is used for quality control.
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
Elecsys Anti-HAV
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K100903
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| | Device K190428 | Predicate K100903 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Elecsys Anti-HAV II | Elecsys Anti-HAV |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | Immunoassay for the in vitro qualitative detection of total antibodies (IgG and IgM) to hepatitis A virus (HAV) in human pediatric (ages 2 through 21 years) and adult serum and plasma (Li heparin, potassium EDTA, Na citrate, Na heparin). The assay, in conjunction with other serological and clinical information, is indicated as an aid in the clinical laboratory diagnosis of acute or past hepatitis A virus infection in persons with signs or symptoms of hepatitis and in persons at increased risk for hepatitis A infection, or as an aid to identify HAV susceptible individuals and to determine | Immunoassay for the in vitro qualitative detection of total antibodies (IgM and IgG) to hepatitis A virus in human serum and plasma (K2-EDTA). The assay is intended for use as an aid in the laboratory diagnosis of past or acute/recent hepatitis A infection. Assay results, in conjunction with other laboratory results and clinical information, may be used to provide presumptive evidence of infection with hepatitis A virus in persons with signs or symptoms of hepatitis and in persons at risk for hepatitis A infection, or used as an aid to determine the presence of antibody response to HAV in vaccine recipients. The electrochemiluminescence |
K190428 - Page 4 of 14
{4}
K190428 - Page 5 of 14
| | Device K190428 | Predicate K100903 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | the presence of an antibody response to HAV in vaccine recipients.
The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay “ECLIA” is intended for use on the cobas e immunoassay analyzers.
Assay performance characteristics have not been established for immunocompromised or immunosuppressed patients.
This assay has not been FDA cleared or approved for the screening of blood or plasma donors. | immunoassay “ECLIA” is intended for use on Elecsys and **cobas e** immunoassay analyzers. |
| Assay Method | Same as predicate | Competition principle binding protein |
| Detection Method | Same as predicate | Electrochemiluminescence |
| Applications/Test Time | Same as predicate | 18 minutes |
| Calibration Method | Same as predicate | 2-point calibration |
| Calibration Interval | Same as predicate | Calibration must be performed once per reagent lot using fresh reagent (i.e., not more than 24 hours since the reagent kit was registered on the analyzer).
Renewed calibration is recommended as follows:
• after 1 month (28 days) when using the same reagent lot
• after 7 days (when using the same reagent kit stored on the analyzer)
• as required: e.g., quality control findings outside the defined limits |
| Traceability/Standardization | Same as predicate | Second International Standard for Anti Hepatitis A, Immunoglobulin, Human, NIBSC code: 97/646 |
| **General Device Characteristic Differences** | | |
| Instrument Platform | cobas e 601 | Elecsys 2010, cobas e 411, cobas e 601, cobas e 602, and MODULAR ANALYTICS E170 |
{5}
K190428 - Page 6 of 14
| | Device K190428 | Predicate K100903 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reagent R2 | • Application of a different biotinylated monoclonal anti-HAV antibody (mouse)
• Change in the ruthenium label complex and increased concentration for the ruthenium labeled monoclonal antibody | • Biotinylated monoclonal anti-HAV antibody (mouse)
• Ruthenium labeled monoclonal anti-HAV antibody (mouse) |
| Reagents R1 and R2 | TRIS buffer based | HEPES buffer based |
| Sample Type | Human serum, plasma (K2-EDTA, K3-EDTA, Na-Citrate, Na-Heparin) | Human serum, plasma (K2-EDTA) |
| Calibrator | AHAV 2 Cal1 and AHAV2 Cal2 (packed in kit – ready to use) | Anti-HAV Cal1 and Cal2 (packed in kit – lyophilized) |
| Sample Volume | 20 μL | 50 μL |
| Controls | PreciControl Anti-HAV II | PreciControl Anti-HAV |
| Interpretation of Results | COI > 1.0 Non-reactive
COI ≤ 1.0 Reactive | ≥ 22.0 IU/L Reactive
18.0 ≤ IU/L < 22.0 Equivocal
<18.0 IU/L Negative |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff – Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Hepatitis A Virus Serological Assays
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision:
A panel comprised of five human serum pools and controls was tested with the Elecsys Anti-HAV II assay. Two aliquots of each panel member were tested in each of two runs per day for 21 days (n = 84). Calibration was performed on day 1 and day 17. The study was performed on one cobas e 601 Immunoassay Analyzer using one lot of reagents.
| | | Repeatability | | Within-Laboratory Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample | Mean (COI) | SD^{a)} (COI) | CV (%) | SD (COI) | CV (%) |
| HSP 1^{b)} | 1.42 | 0.016 | 1.1 | 0.028 | 2.0 |
| HSP2 | 1.15 | 0.012 | 1.1 | 0.022 | 1.9 |
{6}
| | | Repeatability | | Within-Laboratory Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample | Mean (COI) | SDa) (COI) | CV (%) | SD (COI) | CV (%) |
| HSP3 | 0.955 | 0.009 | 0.9 | 0.022 | 2.3 |
| HSP4 | 0.665 | 0.009 | 1.3 | 0.020 | 2.9 |
| HSP5 | 0.006 | 0.0002 | 3.0 | 0.0002 | 3.3 |
| PC AHAV II 1c) | 1.30 | 0.015 | 1.1 | 0.024 | 1.8 |
| PC AHAV II 2 | 0.339 | 0.005 | 1.5 | 0.009 | 2.7 |
a) SD = standard deviation
b) HSP = human serum pool
c) PC = PreciControl
2. Reproducibility
A reproducibility study was performed at three sites using three cobas e 601 analyzers and one reagent lot. A panel consisting of four human serum pools and the PreciControls was tested in three replicates per run, two runs per day for five days (n = 90). The combined precision data for the three testing sites is shown in the following table.
| Precision on the cobas e 601 analyzer | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Repeatability | | Between-run | |
| Sample | Mean COI | SD | CV % | SD | CV % |
| HSP1 | 0.813 | 0.010 | 1.3 | 0.016 | 1.9 |
| HSP2 | 0.904 | 0.012 | 1.3 | 0.016 | 1.8 |
| HSP3 | 1.01 | 0.018 | 1.7 | 0.013 | 1.3 |
| HSP4 | 0.449 | 0.005 | 1.1 | 0.011 | 2.5 |
| PC A-HAV II 1 | 1.30 | 0.018 | 1.4 | 0.009 | 0.7 |
| PC A-HAV II 2 | 0.376 | 0.006 | 1.6 | 0.013 | 3.3 |
| Precision on the cobas e 601 analyzer | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Between- day | | Between- site | | Reproducibility | |
| Sample | Mean COI | SD | CV % | SD | CV % | SD | CV % |
| HSP1 | 0.813 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 0.011 | 1.3 | 0.022 | 2.7 |
| HSP2 | 0.904 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 0.014 | 1.5 | 0.024 | 2.7 |
| HSP3 | 1.01 | 0.004 | 0.4 | 0.016 | 1.6 | 0.027 | 2.7 |
| HSP4 | 0.449 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 0.007 | 1.5 | 0.014 | 3.1 |
| PC A-HAV II 1 | 1.30 | 0.010 | 0.7 | 0.018 | 1.4 | 0.029 | 2.2 |
K190428 - Page 7 of 14
{7}
| Precision on the cobas e 601 analyzer | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Between- day | | Between- site | | Reproducibility | |
| Sample | Mean COI | SD | CV % | SD | CV % | SD | CV % |
| PC A-HAV II 2 | 0.376 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 0.003 | 0.9 | 0.014 | 3.8 |
3. Linearity:
Not applicable.
4. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
a) Cross-reactivity
The effect of potentially cross-reacting antibodies present in anti-HAV negative serum or plasma samples was evaluated. A panel of samples negative for anti-HAV and positive for the conditions / analytes listed below was tested with the Elecsys Anti-HAV II and the comparator Elecsys Anti-HAV assays on the cobas e 601 analyzer. The panel was comprised of ten positive samples for each condition / analyte. Each sample was non-reactive for anti-HAV with both the Elecsys Anti-HAV II and the comparator Elecsys Anti-HAV assays, indicating no cross-reactivity of the Elecsys Anti-HAV II assay with antibodies to other infectious agents.
- Acute Hepatitis B infection
- Acute Hepatitis C infection
- HIV infection
- EBV infection
- Anti-CMV antibodies
- Anti-HSV antibodies
- Toxoplasma gondii infection
- Treponema pallidum infection
- Anti-Mumps/Rubeola antibodies
- Anti-Rubella antibodies
- Anti-Parvovirus B19 antibodies
- Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA)
b) Interference
Endogenous substances
The impact of potentially interfering endogenous substances was evaluated by testing four human serum samples on the cobas e 601 analyzer:
- Negative sample
- High negative sample
- Low positive sample
- Positive sample
One aliquot of each serum sample was spiked with the endogenous substance and another aliquot was spiked with the same volume of the matrix used to prepare the stock
K190428 - Page 8 of 14
{8}
interfering substance. The aliquot containing the endogenous substance was then diluted into the unspiked aliquot in 10% increments. The recovery for each spiked sample was calculated by comparison to the reference (unspiked) sample.
The substances shown in the following table were evaluated and no interference was observed up to the listed concentration.
Endogenous substances
| Compound | Concentration tested |
| --- | --- |
| Bilirubin | ≤ 1129 μmol/L or ≤ 66 mg/dL |
| Hemoglobin | ≤ 0.621 mmol/L or ≤ 1000 mg/dL |
| Intralipid | ≤ 2000 mg/dL |
| Rheumatoid factor | ≤ 1400 IU/mL |
| IgG | ≤ 7.0 g/dL |
| IgA | ≤ 1.6 g/dL |
| IgM | ≤ 1.0 g/dL |
| Serum albumin | ≤ 7.0 g/dL |
Biotin:
Five human serum samples were spiked with a range of biotin concentrations and tested with the Elecsys Anti-HAV II on the cobas e 601 analyzer. The results are shown in the following tables.
| % Bias for samples containing various concentrations of biotin up to 1200 ng/mL | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample | COI with no biotin added | Biotin concentration (ng/mL) | | | | | | |
| | | 20 | 40 | 60 | 80 | 100 | 120 | 140 |
| negative 1 | 1.37 | 0.18 | -2.7 | -3.8 | -7.3 | -11 | -14 | -17 |
| negative 2 | 1.17 | 0.92 | -0.60 | -4.8 | -6.2 | -9.9 | -14 | -17 (FP)* |
| high-negative | 1.06 | 0.58 | -1.3 | -4.2 | -6.6 (FP) | -10 (FP) | -14 (FP) | -18 (FP) |
| low-positive | 0.861 | 0.65 | -3.7 | -3.9 | -9.3 | -11 | -16 | -19 |
| positive | 0.540 | -2.2 | -7.9 | -12 | -15 | -19 | -24 | -28 |
* FP = false positive due to biotin interference
| % Bias for samples containing various concentrations of biotin up to 1200 ng/mL | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample | COI with no biotin added | Biotin concentration (ng/mL) | | | | | |
| | | 160 | 180 | 200 | 300 | 600 | 1200 |
| negative 1 | 1.37 | -19 | -23 | -27 | -37* (FP) | -65 (FP) | -77 (FP) |
| negative 2 | 1.17 | -20 (FP) | -24 (FP) | -27 (FP) | -39 (FP) | -68 (FP) | -79 (FP) |
| high-negative | 1.06 | -21 (FP) | -24 (FP) | -26 (FP) | -46 (FP) | -71 (FP) | -80 (FP) |
| low-positive | 0.861 | -23 | -27 | -29 | -44 | -71 | -82 |
| positive | 0.540 | -30 | -36 | -39 | -52 | -77 | -86 |
* FP = false positive result due to biotin interference
K190428 - Page 9 of 14
{9}
Negative specimens with biotin concentrations up to 100 ng/mL demonstrated ≤ 11 % negative bias in COI values. Biotin concentrations greater than 100 ng/mL lead to higher negative bias and in consequence can lead to false positive Elecsys Anti HAV II results. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that serum concentrations of biotin can reach up to 355 ng/mL within the first hour after ingestion for subjects consuming supplements of 20 mg biotin per day¹ and up to 1160 ng/mL in plasma for subjects consuming a single dose of 300 mg biotin.²
5. Assay Reportable Range:
Not applicable.
6. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
Traceability:
This method has been standardized against WHO Standards NIBSC (National Institute for Biological Standards and Control) code: 97/646.
Specimen Stability:
Six of each human serum, K2-EDTA, Li-Heparin, and Na-Citrate plasma samples and seven K3-EDTA and Na-Heparin plasma samples were aliquoted and measured fresh (reference value) and after storage. Samples were tested in triplicate at the designated time points. Results support the stability of specimens stored under the following conditions:
- 2-8°C for 14 days
- 20-25°C for 6 days
- -15 to -25°C for 3 months
- 5 freeze / thaw cycles
7. Assay Cut-Off:
The 2nd International Standard for Anti-Hepatitis A, Immunoglobulin, Human, NIBSC code: 97/646 was serially diluted to target concentrations ranging from 0 to 500 IU/L in 10 samples prepared from pooled Anti-HAV negative serum. The samples were tested in 2 replicates per run in 2 runs. The study was performed using three reagent and three calibrator lots. The concentration at the cutoff COI = 1 was determined to be ≤ 25.4 IU/L.
K190428 - Page 10 of 14
¹ Grimsey P, Frey N, Bendig G, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of exogenous biotin and the relationship between biotin serum levels and in vitro immunoassay interference. International Journal of Pharmacokinetics 2017 Sept 14;2(4):247-256.
² Piketty ML, Prie D, Sedel F, et al. High-dose biotin therapy leading to false biochemical endocrine profiles: validation of a simple method to overcome biotin interference. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 May 1;55(6):817-825.
{10}
# B Comparison Studies:
# 1. Matrix Comparison:
The recovery of analyte values in the presence of anticoagulants with the Elecsys Anti-HAV II assay was determined by comparing values obtained from samples drawn into matched serum and plasma collection tubes from 60 subjects. The samples were spiked with anti-HAV positive sera from individual donors to obtain a range of anti-HAV concentrations and were tested on the cobas e 601. The difference in COI value of each plasma sample compared to the matched serum sample was calculated. The following table summarizes the results:
| | K2-EDTA | K3-EDTA | Na-Heparin | Li-Heparin | Na-Citrate |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| COI range observed | 0.007 - 1.37 | 0.008 - 1.38 | 0.007 - 1.39 | 0.007 - 1.41 | 0.007 - 1.37 |
| Maximum % change for COI > 1.0 | +8.7% | +9.7% | +6.8% | +6.8% | +4.7% |
| Maximum difference for COI ≤ 1.0 | +0.155 | +0.188 | +0.125 | +0.132 | +0.097 |
# C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
N/A
2. Clinical Specificity:
N/A
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
# Method comparison
Samples from 961 subjects were tested with the Elecsys Anti-HAV II and the comparator Elecsys Anti-HAV assays at three sites using the cobas e 601. Prospective, retrospective, and remnant specimens were included. Results are shown in the following tables.
| | Elecsys Anti-HAV assay results (all sites combined) | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Elecsys Anti-HAV II results | Reactive ≥ 22 IU/L | Border 18.0 ≤ IU/L < 22.0 | Non-reactive < 18.0 IU/L | Total |
| Reactive COI ≤ 1.0 | 501 | 6 | 16 | 523 |
| Non-reactive COI >1.0 | 0 | 1 | 437 | 438 |
K190428 - Page 11 of 14
{11}
Of 502 subjects reactive by the comparator assay, 501 were also positive by the Elecsys Anti-HAV II assay for a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 99.8%. Of 453 subjects non-reactive by the comparator assay, 437 were also non-reactive by the Elecsys Anti-HAV II assay for a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 95.2%. A total of 23 subjects were discordant between the Elecsys Anti-HAV II assay and the comparator assay. Specimens with results in the borderline range of (18.0 ≤ IU/L < 22.0) for the comparator Elecsys Anti-HAV assay were counted as discordant when calculating agreements with the Elecsys Anti-HAV II assay. The lower bound of the confidence interval for the PPA was 98.90% and the lower limit of the confidence interval for NPA was 92.83%.
The study included samples from the following patient cohorts: routine HAV testing, hospitalized, increased risk, symptomatic, characterized acute HAV infected, and pediatric.
Positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement with their respective 95th percentile confidence interval (CI) for each cohort are summarized in the following table.
| Summary of the percent agreements for various specimen cohorts: Elecsys Anti-HAV II* assay versus the predicate (Elecsys Anti-HAV assay)† | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cohort | PPA | | NPA | |
| | PPA (x/n) | 95 % CI | NPA (x/n) | 95 % CI |
| Routine HAV testing | 100 (91/91) | (96.03, 100) | 94.50 (103/109) | (88.40, 97.95) |
| Hospitalized | 98.21 (55/56) | (90.45, 99.95) | 97.22 (140/144) | (93.04, 99.24) |
| Increased risk for hepatitis | 100 (119/119) | (96.95, 100) | 94.25 (82/87) | (87.10, 98.11) |
| Symptomatic | 100 (129/129) | (97.18, 100) | 96.70 (88/91) | (90.67, 99.31) |
| Characterized acute HAV | 100 (65/65) | (94.48, 100) | 100 (10/10) | (69.15, 100) |
| Pediatric | 100 (42/42) | (91.59, 100) | 77.78 (14/18) | (52.36, 93.59) |
| Overall | 99.80 (501/502) | (98.90, 99.99) | 95.21 (437/459) | (92.83, 96.97) |
* Cutoff of 1.0 COI used for Elecsys Anti-HAV II assay
† Specimens with results in the borderline range of (18.0 ≤ IU/L < 22.0) for Elecsys Anti-HAV assay were counted as discordant with the Elecsys Anti-HAV II assay
K190428 - Page 12 of 14
{12}
The lower bound of the 95% confidence intervals for PPA ranged from 90.45% in the hospitalized cohort to 97.18% in the symptomatic cohort. The lower bound of the ≥ 95% confidence intervals for NPA ranged from 52.36% in the pediatric cohort to 93.04% in the hospitalized cohort. For the pediatric cohort, there were 18 specimens negative by the predicate Elecsys Anti-HAV assay, of which 14 (77.8%) were also negative with the Elecsys Anti-HAV II assay. Of the 4 discrepant results in the pediatric population, 2 were borderline by the predicate Elecsys Anti-HAV assay and were counted as discordant when calculating negative percent agreement. The lower bound of the 95% CI for the NPA in the pediatric population is influenced by the small number of specimens (n = 18).
## Pre- and Post-HAV Vaccination
A cohort of specimens that were collected both pre- and post-HAV vaccination was evaluated by the Elecsys Anti-HAV II assay and the predicate Elecsys Anti-HAV assay. The post-vaccination specimen was obtained at least 4 weeks, but not more than 10 weeks, after the completion of the vaccine regimen. Three HAV vaccines, which are currently licensed in the U.S., were used. No discordant results between the Elecsys Anti-HAV II and the Elecsys Anti-HAV assay were observed. The combined results are summarized in the following table:
| | HAVRIX | TWINRIX | VAQTA | All Vaccines |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PPA | 100.00 (15/15) | 100.00 (19/19) | 100.00 (15/15) | 100.00 (49/49) |
| 95% CI | (78.20, 100.00) | (82.35, 100.00) | (78.20, 100.00) | (92.75, 100.00) |
| NPA | 100.00 (15/15) | 100.00 (19/19) | 100.00 (15/15) | 100.00 (49/49) |
| 95%CI | (78.20, 100.00) | (82.35, 100.00) | (78.20, 100.00) | (92.75, 100.00) |
## Seroconversion Panels
Four seroconversion panels were evaluated. Each panel consisted of multiple specimens collected from one subject over time. According to information provided by the panel vendor, the collection days spanned the point of seroconversion from a non-reactive anti-HAV status to a reactive status. The four panels were analyzed with the Elecsys Anti-HAV II and the predicate Elecsys Anti-HAV assays using the cobas e 601. Results for the Elecsys Anti-HAV II and Elecsys Anti-HAV assays were equivalent in all four panels.
| | Bleed Day of Earliest Reactive Result (Draw #) | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panel ID | Elecsys Anti-HAV II | Comparator Elecsys Anti-HAV |
| BX-HAV-001 | 1 (1)* | 1 (1)* |
| BX-HAV-002 | 6 (2) | 6 (2) |
| SC0026 | 10 (4) | 10 (4) |
| SC903 | 38 (3) | 38 (3) |
*Non-reactive at bleed day 0 according to data supplied by the vendor of the panel
K190428 - Page 13 of 14
{13}
D Clinical Cut-Off:
Refer to the Assay Cut-off section above for additional details.
E Expected Values/Reference Range:
Prospectively collected serum specimens were tested with the Elecsys Anti-HAV II assay to evaluate the prevalence of HAV antibodies in a population of presumed healthy adults. Individuals were recruited at two sites, one in the Eastern United States (New York), representing a historically lower prevalence region, and one in the Western United States (Utah), representing a historically higher prevalence region. A total of 800 specimens, 400 from each collection site, were evaluated. Results showed reactive rates of 29.50% in the Eastern US vs. 53.75% in the Western US.
F Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data:
Not applicable.
VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K190428 - Page 14 of 14
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.