K183530 · Akonni Biosystems, Inc. · ODW · May 24, 2019 · Clinical Toxicology
Device Facts
Record ID
K183530
Device Name
TruDiagnosis System
Applicant
Akonni Biosystems, Inc.
Product Code
ODW · Clinical Toxicology
Decision Date
May 24, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.3360
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The TruDiagnosis® System is an in vitro diagnostic device intended for processing and genotyping multiple genetic variants in a DNA sample utilizing on-slide PCR gel-drop microarray technology. The TruDiagnosis® System consists of the TruDx® 2000 Imager, the TruArray® Warfarin Sensitivity Test Kit, and the ProFlex™ PCR System using the ProFlex™ 2x Flat Sample Block. The TruDx® 2000 Imager is an instrument intended for processing and genotyping multiple genetic variants in a DNA sample utilizing on-slide PCR gel-drop microarray technology. The TruArray® Warfarin Sensitivity Test Kit is an in vitro diagnostic test for the detection and genotyping of the 2C9*2, 2C9*3 alleles of the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) 2C9 gene locus and Vitamin K epoxide reductase CL, VKORCI, gene promoter polymorphism (-1639) from genomic DNA of human saliva samples collected using the Oragene® Dx Device (OGD-500) as an aid in the identification of patients at risk for increased warfarin sensitivity. The TruArray® Warfarin Sensitivity Test Kit is a qualitative assay for use in clinical laboratories upon prescription by the attending physician.
Device Story
The TruDiagnosis System is an in vitro diagnostic platform for genotyping genetic variants associated with warfarin sensitivity. It processes human saliva samples collected via Oragene® Dx OGD-500. The workflow involves DNA extraction, followed by on-slide asymmetric PCR and allele-specific hybridization within a single chamber on the TruArray® Test Slide. The TruDx® 2000 Imager, equipped with a green LED and digital camera, captures fluorescence images of the microarray. The integrated TruSpot™ Software analyzes these images to calculate signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), assigns genotypes, and generates clinical reports. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel, the system provides qualitative results to assist physicians in identifying patients at risk for increased warfarin sensitivity, potentially optimizing dosing decisions.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical trials performed. Analytical performance established via bench testing. Precision/reproducibility study (n=360) across three sites, four operators, and multiple lots showed 100% final correct call rate. Method comparison against bidirectional Sanger sequencing (n=303) demonstrated 99.6% overall agreement. Analytical specificity testing confirmed no interference from endogenous substances (amylase, hemoglobin, IgA, protein) or exogenous activities (eating, drinking, gum, mouthwash, smoking).
Technological Characteristics
System utilizes on-slide PCR gel-drop microarray technology. Hardware includes TruDx 2000 Imager (green LED, optics, grayscale camera) and ProFlex thermal cycler. Microarray consists of 3D hydrogel droplets covalently attached to glass substrate with oligonucleotide probes. Connectivity: Standalone. Software: TruSpot for image analysis and genotyping. Sterilization: Not specified. Energy: Electrical.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring warfarin sensitivity assessment. Detects/genotypes CYP450 2C9 (*2, *3 alleles) and VKORC1 (-1639) polymorphisms from human saliva-derived genomic DNA. For use in clinical laboratories by prescription.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A drug metabolizing enzyme genotyping system is a device intended for use in testing deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extracted from clinical samples to identify the presence or absence of human genotypic markers encoding a drug metabolizing enzyme. This device is used as an aid in determining treatment choice and individualizing treatment dose for therapeutics that are metabolized primarily by the specific enzyme about which the system provides genotypic information.
Special Controls
The special control is FDA's guidance document entitled "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Drug Metabolizing Enzyme Genotyping System."
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control is FDA's guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Drug Metabolizing Enzyme Genotyping Test System.” See § 862.1(d) for the availability of this guidance document.
Predicate Devices
eSensor Warfarin Sensitivity Test and XT-8 Instrument (k073720)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k183530
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Measurand:
Genotype of Cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) and Vitamin K Epoxide Reductase Complex Subunit 1 (VKORC1)
D. Type of Test:
Qualitative genotyping
E. Applicant:
Akonni Biosystems Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
TruDiagnosis® System
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Regulation Name | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ODW | Drug metabolizing enzyme genotyping system | Class II | 21 CFR 862.3360 | Toxicology (91) |
| ODV | Prothrombin time test | Class II | 21 CFR 864.7750 | Hematology (81) |
| NSU | Instrumentation for clinical multiplex test systems | Class II | 21 CFR 862.2570 | Chemistry (75) |
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indication(s) for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The TruDiagnosis® System is an in vitro diagnostic device intended for processing and genotyping multiple genetic variants in a DNA sample utilizing on-slide PCR gel-drop microarray technology. The TruDiagnosis® System consists of the TruDx® 2000 Imager, the TruArray® Warfarin Sensitivity Test Kit, and the ProFlex™ PCR System using the ProFlex™ 2x Flat Sample Block.
The TruDx® 2000 Imager is an instrument intended for processing and genotyping multiple genetic variants in a DNA sample utilizing on-slide PCR gel-drop microarray technology.
The TruArray® Warfarin Sensitivity Test Kit is an in vitro diagnostic test for the detection and genotyping of the 2C9*2, 2C9*3 alleles of the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) 2C9 gene locus and Vitamin K epoxide reductase C1, VKORC1, gene promoter polymorphism (-1639) from genomic DNA of human saliva samples collected using the Oragene® Dx Device (OGD-500) as an aid in the identification of patients at risk for increased warfarin sensitivity. The TruArray® Warfarin Sensitivity Test Kit is a qualitative assay for use in clinical laboratories upon prescription by the attending physician.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
The information provided from this test may supplement therapeutic decision-making and should only be used in conjunction with routine monitoring by a physician. Clinicians should use professional judgment in the interpretation of results from this type of test.
4. Special instrument requirements:
- TruDx® 2000 Imager
- ProFlex™ PCR System using the ProFlex™ 2x Flat Sample Block that is provided by Akonni with the TruDiagnosis® System
- Oragene® Dx collection device OGD-500
- Qiagen QIAamp DSP DNA Mini Kit
I. Device Description:
The TruDiagnosis® System is an in vitro diagnostic device intended for processing and genotyping multiple genes in a DNA sample utilizing on-slide Polymerase Chain
2
{2}
Reaction (PCR) gel-drop microarray technology. The TruDiagnosis® System consists of the following:
- Hardware: TruDx® 2000 Imager, ProFlex™ PCR System using the ProFlex™ 2x Flat Sample Block that is provided by Akonni with the TruDiagnosis® System
- Software: TruSpot™ Software
- Test Kit: TruArray® Warfarin Sensitivity Test Kit
Hardware: TruDx® 2000 is an instrument that consists of a high-intensity green light emitting diode (LED), custom optics, and a digital grayscale camera. The purpose of the TruDx® 2000 Imager is to capture a fluorescence image of the microarray after completing the test. The user inserts the TruArray® Test Slide into the TruDx® 2000 Imager and follows the on-screen prompts. The resulting microarray image is automatically analyzed and reported with the TruSpot™ Software. The ProFlex™ PCR System with the ProFlex™ 2x Flat Sample Block, a component of the TruDiagnosis® System, is an end-point thermal cycler, specifically designed for the amplification of nucleic acids using the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) process.
Software: Akonni's TruSpot™ Software, integrated within the imager, locates and segments each fluorescently labeled microarray gel-element and reports signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). Assay results interpreted by the TruSpot™ software program are assigned a genotype and presented to the end user in a report format.
Test Kit: The TruArray® Warfarin Sensitivity Test Kit includes consumables and reagents necessary to perform multiplex on-slide PCR amplification, and fluorogenic target-specific microarray-based hybridization. The TruArray® Warfarin Sensitivity Test Kit consists of the TruPlex PCR Master Mix, TruPlex Warfarin Primer Mix, Formamide (deionized), TruArray Wash Buffer, and TruArray Warfarin Test Slide. The TruArray® Warfarin Sensitivity Test Kit is intended for use with DNA extracted from saliva collected from Oragene® Dx OGD-50 device using the Qiagen QIAamp DSP DNA Mini Kit.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
eSensor Warfarin Sensitivity Test and XT-8 Instrument
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k073720
{3}
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | TruDiagnosis® System Candidate Device | eSensor Warfarin Sensitivity Test and eSensor XT-8 Instrument (k073720) Predicate Device |
| Indication(s) for use | Aid in the identification of patients at risk for increased warfarin sensitivity. | Same |
| Test type | Qualitative genetic test for single nucleotide polymorphism detection | Same |
| Gene/Mutations detected | CYP2C9*2 (430C>T) CYP2C9*3 (1075A>T) VKORC1 (-1639G>A) | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | TruDiagnosis® System Candidate Device | eSensor Warfarin Sensitivity Test and eSensor XT-8 Instrument (k073720) Predicate Device |
| Detection Method | Fluorescence detection based gel-drop microarray | Electrochemical detection based microarray |
| Microarray substrate | Slide | Test cartridge |
| Sample Type | Genomic DNA from human saliva | Genomic DNA from human whole blood |
| Extraction | QIAamp DSP DNA Mini Kit | Multiple DNA extraction methods |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
None referenced
L. Test Principle:
The TruArray® Warfarin Sensitivity Test Kit and genomic DNA (gDNA) extracted from saliva collected using the OrageneDx OGD-500 and the Qiagen QIAamp DSP DNA Mini Kit are used to perform on-slide PCR and hybridization within the TruArray® Test Slide using the ProFlex™ PCR System using the ProFlex™ 2x Flat Sample Block followed by imaging on the TruDx® 2000 Imager.
{4}
Amplification reactions are prepared using the TruArray® Warfarin Sensitivity Test Kit components (TruPlex Master Mix, TruPlex Warfarin Primer Mix and Formamide (deionized)) and extracted gDNA. Amplification reactions are loaded into the inlet port on the TruArray® Test Slide.
PCR amplification and microarray hybridization occur simultaneously in the same reaction chamber in the TruArray® Warfarin Test Slide on the ProFlex™ PCR System using the ProFlex™ 2x Flat Sample Block provided by Akonni with the TruDiagnosis® System. DNA is amplified and hybridized using a specified thermal cycling protocol. After the amplification and hybridization process, the array is washed by piercing the inlet port with a pipettor tip and dispensing 1000 μL of the TruArray® Wash Buffer through the chamber. The excess PCR amplicons, reaction by-products, and the wash buffer are retained on-slide in the integrated waste chamber. The TruArray® Test Slide is placed in a 50 mL conical tube and centrifuged at 540 x g for 2 minutes in a non-refrigerated centrifuge to dry the array chamber prior to imaging.
The TruArray® Tests Slides are prepared using TruArray® microarray technology. The TruArray® is a spatially ordered array of three-dimensional hydrogel droplets, each droplet containing a unique capture probe. The hydrogel matrix is covalently attached to a glass substrate and oligonucleotide probes are covalently attached to the hydrogel scaffold. The purpose of the TruArray® is to specifically detect fluorescently labeled target amplicons via microarray-based hybridization.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Reproducibility of the TruDiagnosis® System was evaluated at three sites (two external and one internal) over 5 days. Eight saliva samples from each of six donors covering all possible genotypes for all three alleles in the TruDiagnosis® System were collected using the Oragene® Dx OGD-500 collection device. Using saliva from two collection tubes per donor, DNA was extracted using the Qiagen QIAamp DSP DNA Mini Kit in triplicate for five non-consecutive days by each of four operators (15 replicates per operator per genotype) for a total of 60 replicates per donor/genotype. Four operators performed the reproducibility study across the three sites using four lots of TruArray® Warfarin Sensitivity Test Kit reagents and three TruDx® 2000 Imagers. Results from the TruDiagnosis® System were compared to the genotype for each sample as determined by bidirectional Sanger sequencing.
5
{5}
| Donor/Sample | CYP2C9*2 | CYP2C9*3 | VKORC1 -1639 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | *1/*1 | *3/*3 | G/G |
| 2 | *2/*2 | *1/*1 | G/A |
| 3 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | G/G |
| 4 | *1/*2 | *1/*3 | G/A |
| 5 | *1/*1 | *1/*3 | A/A |
| 6 | *1/*2 | *1/*1 | A/G |
Results are summarized in the table below:
| Genotype | | | # samples tested | First Run Results | | | | Final Resultsa | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CYP 2C9*2 | CYP 2C9*3 | VKORC1 -1639 | | # correct callsb | # no calls | # in-correct calls | Correct call rate (%) | # correct callsb | # no calls | # in-correct calls | Correct call rate (%) |
| *1/*1 | *3/*3 | GG | 60 | 52 | 8 | 0 | 86.7 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *1/*2 | *1/*1 | AA | 60 | 53 | 7 | 0 | 88.3 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *1/*1 | *1/*1 | GG | 60 | 50 | 10 | 0 | 83.3 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *1/*1 | *1/*3 | AA | 60 | 50 | 10 | 0 | 83.3 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *2/*2 | *1/*1 | GA | 60 | 50 | 10 | 0 | 83.3 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *1/*2 | *1/*3 | GA | 60 | 48 | 12 | 0 | 80 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Total | | | 360 | 303 | 57 | 0 | 84.2 | 360 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
aFinal Results reflect up to four repeats of samples with no calls during the first run and subsequent runs
bCorrect call rate = # correct calls / # of samples tested
Analysis of the data by operator and by lot was reviewed and supported there was no difference in precision between operators or between lots.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Controls: Positive or negative controls are not included with this assay. The manufacturer has recommended that an external positive and negative control should be processed with each run of 16 test slides to assure the integrity of sample preparation, kit reagents, individual laboratory practices, and proper functioning of the system. The external positive control(s) should be 25 ng human gDNA of known *2, *3 and VKORC1 genotype; the external negative control should be a reagent blank (e.g., nuclease-free water). All quality control requirements and testing should be performed in conformance with local, state and/or federal regulations.
Stability: The sponsor states in their labeling that the TruArray® Warfarin Sensitivity Test Kit components are stable for up to six months when stored as follows:
- TruPlex PCR Master Mix: -15°C to -25°C
{6}
- TruPlex Warfarin Primer Mix: -15°C to -25°C
- Formamide (deionized): -15°C to -25°C
- TruArray Wash Buffer: 17°C to 27°C
- TruArray Warfarin Test Slide: 2°C to 8°C
d. Detection limit:
An upper and lower limit of detection study was performed to assess the genotyping performance of the TruDiagnosis® System across a range of genomic DNA input concentrations. Serial dilutions (125, 25, 2.5, 0.25 ng) of three genomic DNA samples of different genotypes extracted using the Qiagen QIAamp DSP DNA Mini Kit from saliva samples collected using the Oragene® Dx OGD-500 device were assayed 40 times using the TruDiagnosis® System. Seven operators performed the testing over 12 days using five reagent lots of the TruArray® Warfarin Sensitivity Test Kit and three TruDx® 2000 Imagers. Results from the TruDiagnosis® System were compared to the genotype for each sample as determined by bidirectional Sanger sequencing. Results are as summarized in the table below.
The recommended DNA input for the TruDiagnosis® System is 25 ng at a concentration of 5 ng/μL. The package insert states:
- "The recommended DNA input is 25 ng at a concentration of 5 ng/μL"
- "Failure to provide 25 ng purified gDNA may generate invalid test results. Samples with DNA concentrations less than 2.5 ng may generate incorrect results"
e. Analytical specificity:
An evaluation of potential assay interferences was performed to assess the genotyping performance of the TruDiagnosis® System, when potential interferents are present in saliva samples.
Endogenous Interferents
Five donors provided saliva samples collected using the Oragene® Dx collection device OGD-500. Each saliva sample was divided into five aliquots and spiked with one of four potentially interfering substances. The fifth aliquot was not spiked with any potentially interfering substance and served as a control. Three extractions using the Qiagen QIAamp DSP DNA Mini Kit were performed on each sample.
The genotypes as determined by bidirectional Sanger sequencing for the five donors were as follows:
{7}
| Donor/Sample | CYP2C9*2 | CYP2C9*3 | VKORC1 -1639 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | *1/*1 | *3/*3 | G/G |
| 2 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | G/G |
| 3 | *1/*2 | *1/*1 | G/A |
| 4 | *1/*1 | *1/*3 | A/A |
| 5 | *2/*2 | *1/*1 | G/A |
Results from the testing are summarized below. There was 100% agreement between the TruDiagnosis® System and bidirectional DNA sequencing for all test substances following a first run, or a second run for no calls observed during the first run, supporting that these interfering substances have no effect on genotyping.
| Interferent | Concentration | # samples tested | First Run Results | | | | Final Resultsa | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | # correct callsb | # no calls | # in-correct calls | Correct call rate (%) | # correct callsb | # no calls | # in-correct calls | Correct call rate (%) |
| Control | N/A | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Amylase | 311-341 U | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Hemoglobin | 21.2-22.1 mg/mL | 15 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 93.3 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| IgA | 300-500 mg/L | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Total Protein | 2.1-2.7 mg/mL | 15 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 86.7 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
aFinal Results reflect a second repeat run of samples with no calls during the first run
bCorrect call rate = # correct calls / # of samples tested
## Exogenous Interferents
Potentially interfering exogenous substances (eating, drinking, chewing gum, mouthwash and smoking) introduced into saliva samples collected using the Oragene® Dx collection device OGD-500 through various activities were tested. Each activity group was composed of five donors who each provided two samples: a baseline/control sample prior to the activity, and a sample collected 30 minutes after the activity. DNA was extracted using the Qiagen QIAamp DSP DNA Mini Kit. Samples were tested in triplicate. Results from the TruDiagnosis® System were compared to the genotype for each sample as determined by bidirectional Sanger sequencing.
Results from the testing are summarized below. There was 100% agreement between the TruDiagnosis® System and bidirectional DNA sequencing for all activities following a first run, or a second run for no calls observed during the first run, supporting that these activities have no effect on genotyping after 30 minutes.
{8}
| Activity | Timepoint | # samples tested | First Run Results | | | | Final Resultsa | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | # correct callsb | # no calls | # in-correct calls | Correct call rate (%) | # correct callsb | # no calls | # in-correct calls | Correct call rate (%) |
| Eating | Baseline | 15 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 93.3 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| | 30 minutes | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Drinking | Baseline | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| | 30 minutes | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Chewing Gum | Baseline | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| | 30 minutes | 15 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 86.7 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Mouthwash | Baseline | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| | 30 minutes | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Smoking | Baseline | 15 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 40 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| | 30 minutes | 15 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 60 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
aFinal Results reflect a second repeat run of samples with no calls during the first run
bCorrect call rate = # correct calls / # of samples tested
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison:
The method comparison evaluation was performed to assess the genotyping accuracy of the TruDiagnosis® System as compared to bi-directional DNA sequencing. Testing was conducted at one site (internal site). The test panel for the method comparison study consisted of 303 unique human genomic DNA samples isolated from saliva specimens collected using the Oragene® Dx OGD-500 device. DNA was extracted using the Qiagen QIAamp DSP DNA Mini Kit.
The study was performed by four operators using four lots of the TruArray® Warfarin Sensitivity Test Kit and four TruDx® 2000 Imagers over 14 testing days. The samples were typically run for their first-pass call in batches of 16 samples including 13 test samples, a negative extraction control, a positive PCR control and negative PCR control. An additional run was performed for tests that gave a first-pass no-call result.
Agreement between the TruDiagnosis® System and bi-directional DNA sequencing (by loci):
{9}
| Genotypea | # samples tested | # correct callsb | # no calls | # in-correct calls | Agreement | 95% One-Sided Confidence Lower Limit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2C9*2 *1/*1 | 227 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 98.7 |
| 95.6274.C9*2 *1/*2 | 66 | 66 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 95.6 |
| 2C9*2 *2/*2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 74.1 |
| 2C9*2 Total | 303 | 303 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 98.8 |
| 2C9*3 *1/*1 | 247 | 247 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 98.8 |
| 2C9*3 *1/*3 | 55 | 54 | 1 | 0 | 98.2 | 91.7 |
| 2C9*3 *3/*3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 5.0 |
| 2C9*3 Total | 303 | 302 | 1 | 0 | 99.6 | 98.2 |
| VKORC1 -1639 AA | 102 | 101 | 1 | 0 | 99 | 95.4 |
| VKORC1 -1639 GA | 126 | 125 | 0 | 1 | 99.2 | 96.3 |
| VKORC1 -1639 GG | 75 | 74 | 1 | 0 | 98.7 | 93.8 |
| VKORC1 -1639 Total | 303 | 301 | 1 | 1 | 99.3 | 97.6 |
aGenotype determined by bidirectional DNA sequencing
${}^{\mathrm{b}}$ Calls produced on first run
Agreement between the TruDiagnosis® System and bi-directional DNA sequencing (by sample):
| Genotype | | | # samples tested | First Run Results | | | | Final Resultsa | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CYP 2C9*2 | CYP 2C9*3 | VKORC1 -1639 | | # correct callsb | # no calls | # in-correct calls | Correct call rate (%) | # correct callsb | # no calls | # in-correct calls | Correct call rate (%) |
| *1/*1 | *1/*1 | AA | 58 | 57 | 1 | 0 | 98.3 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *1/*1 | *1/*1 | GA | 79 | 79 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 79 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *1/*1 | *1/*1 | GG | 41 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *1/*2 | *1/*1 | AA | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *1/*2 | *1/*1 | GA | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *1/*2 | *1/*1 | GG | 30 | 29 | 1 | 0 | 96.7 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *1/*1 | *1/*3 | AA | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *1/*1 | *1/*3 | GA | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
{10}
| Genotype | | | # samples tested | First Run Results | | | | Final Resultsa | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CYP 2C9*2 | CYP 2C9*3 | VKORC1 -1639 | | # correct callsb | # no calls | # in-correct calls | Correct call rate (%) | # correct callsb | # no calls | # in-correct calls | Correct call rate (%) |
| *1/*1 | *1/*3 | GG | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *2/*2 | *1/*1 | AA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *2/*2 | *1/*1 | GA | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 83.3 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 83.3 |
| *2/*2 | *1/*1 | GG | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *1/*1 | *3/*3 | GG | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *1/*2 | *1/*3 | GA | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| *1/*2 | *1/*3 | GG | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Total | | | 303 | 299 | 3 | 1 | 98.7 | 303 | 0 | 1 | 99.6 |
aFinal Results reflect a second repeat run of samples with no calls during the first run
bCorrect call rate = # correct calls / # of samples tested
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
In the package insert, the sponsor includes the following allele frequencies across ethnic groups for each allele which have been shown to affect an individual's sensitivity to warfarin.
{11}
| Allele | Ethnicity | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Caucasian | African | Asian |
| CYP2C9*2 | 0.9-20% | 0.8-7% | 0% |
| CYP2C9*3 | 0-14.5% | 0.4-3% | 0-8.2% |
| VKORC1 -1639 | 37% | 14% | 89% |
N. Instrument Name:
TruDx® 2000 Imager
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Does the applicant’s device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device?
Yes ☐ X ☐ or No ☐
Does the applicant’s device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission?
Yes ☐ or No ☐ X ☐
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X ☐ or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
The TruDx® 2000 Imager comes equipped with a barcode scanner and stand to scan sample accession IDs and the barcodes identified on the Test Slide. Alternatively, the sample identification can be entered manually.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
Human genomic DNA from saliva collected using the Oragene® Dx OGD 500 Device and extracted using Qiagen QIAamp DSP DNA Mini Kit.
5. Calibration:
The instrument does not require calibration. Optical system checks should be performed periodically to ensure the accuracy of the imager. Optical System checks are performed
{12}
using the Uniformity Test Slide included with the TruDx® 2000 Imager. The user can select Run Optical System Check from the Configuration screen to initiate the analysis workflow for the optical system check.
6. Quality Control:
An external positive and negative control should be processed with each run of Test Slides to ensure the integrity of sample preparation, kit reagents, and individual laboratory practices. The external positive control(s) should be 25 ng human gDNA of known *2, *3 and VKORC1 genotype; the external negative control should be a reagent blank (e.g., nuclease-free water).
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Parts 801 and 809, as applicable and the special controls for this device type under 21 CFR 862.3360 and 21 CFR 862.2570.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
13
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.